Search

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of a variety of malignancies including advanced melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, head and neck cancers among others. Since their introduction, there has been significant improvement in survival and prognosis in patients with advanced malignancies. Unfortunately, improved outcomes have come at a price of significant immune-related adverse events, with those of the gastrointestinal tract being the most common. Gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events frequently present as diarrhea and colitis, the severity of which can range from mild diarrhea to fulminant colitis with intestinal perforation. Currently, management of ICI-induced colitis is primarily guided by retrospective studies and expert opinion. A significant number of ICI-induced colitis responds to high-dose corticosteroids; however, some patients require further therapy with biologics. There is limited information on the factors which may predispose patients to ICI-induced colitis. Future research elucidating these risk factors along with development of a scoring system could allow for risk-stratification of patients before initiation of ICI therapy. Such a system may help clinicians and patients keep a high index of suspicion regarding ICI-induced colitis and could hopefully reduce the incidence of severe cases. Similarly, future studies should investigate protective factors against ICI-induced colitis, which could potentially allow more patients to safely benefit from ICI therapy.

Declining Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication rates have prompted a switch in first-line therapy from standard triple (PPI, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin) to bismuth-based quadruple therapy. A caveat of the ACG 2017 H. pylori treatment guidelines was a paucity of recent US eradication data. To determine Rhode Island H. pylori eradication data, in the largest US study from the last two decades. Electronic records were queried for patients with H. pylori infection diagnosed by pathology, urea breath test, or stool antigen from 2015 to 2017. Demographics, diagnostic test, treatment regimen, and test of cure were extracted. Eradication rates were calculated, and treatment regimens were compared. A total of 1710 patients were identified (64% female): 825 (46%) diagnosed by breath test, 755 (42%) by biopsy, and 191 (12%) by stool antigen. Full data were obtained on 1101 patients. Seven regimens were used: quadruple (64%), triple (25%), doxycycline quadruple (5%), and miscellaneous (6%). Quadruple was superior to triple: (85% vs. 75%, P = 0.002), quadruple 14 days versus triple 14 days (87% vs. 79%, P = 0.0052), quadruple 10 days versus triple 10 days (77% vs. 67%, P = 0.33). Increased therapy length improved eradication (quadruple 14 days vs. 10 days, 87% vs. 77%, P = 0.002; triple 14 days versus 10 days 79% vs. 67%, P = 0.13). Finally, substituting doxycycline for tetracycline yielded lower eradication (85% vs. 67%, P = 0.006). Quadruple therapy is superior to triple therapy within the Rhode Island population. Fourteen-day therapy achieves superior eradication compared to 10-day therapy, and doxycycline is inferior to tetracycline for quadruple therapy. Our findings support adherence to ACG and international guidelines advising 14-day quadruple therapy.

Background Biologic treatment for moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) places patients at risk for infectious complications. Tuberculosis (TB) infection and reactivation can lead to serious morbidity and mortality for immunosuppressed patients. As a result, guidelines recommend screening for TB before starting biologic treatment, but a paucity of data remains on the utility of surveillance testing. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review at a single academic center evaluating both IBD and non-IBD patients on biologic therapy. The primary outcome was to determine the number of subsequent surveillance tests performed after initial screening for latent TB in both patient groups. Results A total of 188 patients (147 IBD and 41 non-IBD patients) on biologic therapy were included. Screening for TB before biologic treatment was performed in 56% of non-IBD patients versus 83% for patients with IBD (P = 0.0003). Of the total cohort, 65% had at least 2 follow-up surveillance tests for TB. Three or more surveillance tests were performed in 40% of patients with IBD versus only 13% for non-IBD patients (P = 0.0132). A total of 7 patients (4%) had an abnormal surveillance test. No patients were confirmed to have a diagnosis of TB or underwent treatment. Conclusions Patients on biologic therapy unnecessarily undergo surveillance testing for TB. Patients with IBD on biologic therapy are screened annually for TB at a higher rate compared to non-IBD patients. Standardization of care among patients on biologic therapy is necessary to avoid excessive testing in areas with a low incidence of TB.

We present the case of an elderly male patient with known multiple myeloma who was hospitalized with profuse watery diarrhea and abdominal pain after a course of induction chemotherapy. Intestinal intramural gas was found on imaging and the diagnosis of pneumatosis intestinalis was confirmed by colonoscopy. We propose counterperfusion supersaturation as the etiology for this patient’s pneumatosis coli via disruption of homeostasis between nitrogen and hydrogen normally present in the bowel. His condition was successfully treated with antidiarrheal medications and inhaled oxygen as well as intravenous hydration, and he eventually completed multiple myeloma directed chemotherapy with an excellent response. In this report, we discuss how clinicians can improve management of pneumatosis intestinalis by understanding the proposed pathophysiology.