Search

During 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the delivery of HIV prevention and treatment services globally. To mitigate the negative consequences of the pandemic, service providers and communities adapted and accelerated an array of HIV interventions to meet the needs of people living with HIV and people at risk of acquiring HIV in diverse geographical and epidemiological settings. As a result of these adaptations, services such as HIV treatment showed programmatic resilience and remained relatively stable in 2020 and into the first half of 2021. To review lessons learned and suggest which novel approaches to sustain, UNAIDS convened a virtual consultation on Feb 1-2, 2022, which was attended by a range of stakeholders from different areas of global HIV response.

Introduction Understanding differences in knowledge and behaviors among men who have sex with men (MSM), men who have sex with women (MSW), and women, is critical to tailor HIV treatment. We investigated these differences among an international sample of people living with HIV (PLHIV) in 25 countries. Methods Data came from the 2019 Positive Perspectives Study, an online convenience sample of PLHIV in 25 middleand high-income countries. Participants were categorized as MSM (n=1018), MSW (n=479), or women (n=696), based on self-classified gender and sexual orientation. Descriptive and multivariable analyses were performed (p

Prevalence of HIV in Belize is high, and men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionately impacted by HIV. HIV testing is critical in curbing the epidemic; however, little is known about factors associated with testing among MSM in Belize. Working with a non-governmental organization in a large, urban city within Belize, snowball sampling was applied to recruit Belizean MSM to complete a self-administered survey. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to understand associations with HIV screening behavior. Access to healthcare, HIV knowledge, and reporting having heard of Section 53 of the Criminal Code of Belize (once outlawing same-sex sexual behavior), but not experiencing any negative impact from Section 53 were significantly positively associated with having received an HIV test in the past six months. Healthcare maltreatment (lifetime), depression symptomology, and shame were significantly negatively associated with having received a HIV test in the past six months. Findings suggest that multiple factors associated with stigma and discrimination negatively affect testing strategies among MSM in Belize.

We assessed patient-provider communication in HIV care; data were from the 2019 Positive Perspectives Survey of people living with HIV (PLHIV) from 25 countries (n = 2389). A significantly greater proportion of recently diagnosed individuals were interested in being involved when it comes to decisions about their HIV treatment compared with any other group (72.8% [399/548], 63.1% [576/913], and 62.6% [581/928], diagnosis year: 2017–2019, 2010–2016, and pre-2010 respectively) but reported less understanding of their treatment compared with those reporting the longest duration (66.8% [366/548], 68.6% [626/913], and 77.3% [717/928], respectively). One-third of PLHIV with salient treatment-related concerns were uncomfortable discussing with providers. Of participants who felt that their HIV medication limited their life but did not discuss their concerns with their provider (n = 203), top reasons for not discussing were: perception nothing could be done (49.3% [100/203]), provider never brought up the issue (37.9% [77/203]), and not wanting to appear difficult (30.5% [62/203]). To continue to identify and address unmet treatment needs among PLHIV, providers need to ensure that there is ongoing open dialogue. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10461-020-02973-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Objectives‘Undetectable equals Untransmittable’ (U=U) is an empowering message that may enable people living with HIV (PLHIV) to reach and maintain undetectability. We estimated the percentage of PLHIV who ever discussed U=U with their main HIV care provider, and measured associations with health-related outcomes. Secondarily, we evaluated whether the impact of the U=U message varied between those who heard it from their healthcare provider (HCP) vs from elsewhere.MethodsData were from the 25-country 2019 Positive Perspectives Survey of PLHIV on treatment (n=2389). PLHIV were classified as having discussed U=U with their HCP if they indicated that their HCP had ever told them about U=U. Those who had not discussed U=U with their HCP but were nonetheless aware that ‘My HIV medication prevents me from passing on HIV to others’ were classified as being made aware of U=U from non-HCP sources. Multivariable logistic regression was used to measure associations between exposure to U=U messages and health outcomes.ResultsOverall, 66.5% reported ever discussing U=U with their HCP, from 38.0% (South Korea) to 87.3% (Switzerland). Prevalence was lowest among heterosexual men (57.6%) and PLHIV in Asia (51.3%). Compared with those unaware of U=U, those reporting U=U discussions with their HCP had lower odds of suboptimal adherence (AOR=0.59, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.78) and higher odds of self-reported viral suppression (AOR=2.34, 95% CI 1.72 to 3.20), optimal sexual health (AOR=1.48, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.92) and reporting they ‘always shared’ their HIV status (AOR=2.99, 95% CI 1.42 to 6.28). While exposure to U=U information from non-HCP sources was beneficial too, the observed associations were attenuated relative to those seen with reported discussions with HCPs.ConclusionHCP discussion of U=U with PLHIV was associated with favourable health outcomes. However, missed opportunities exist since a third of PLHIV reported not having any U=U discussion with their HCP. U=U discussions with PLHIV should be considered as a standard of care in clinical guidelines.

Introduction Trans people are disproportionately impacted by HIV yet have not been adequately prioritized in national HIV responses or policy documents. This review aims to understand the extent of meaningful inclusion of trans people in national strategic plans (NSPs) for HIV/AIDS as an essential step in ensuring that HIV policy aligns with epidemiologic data, and trans‐specific programming is funded, implemented and sustained. Methods HIV NSPs from 60 countries, across five global regions, were assessed for the level of inclusion of trans populations between January and March 2021. The most recently available NSP for each country, published after 2011, was obtained through publicly accessible online sources or through researcher networks. Data were manually extracted from NSPs using a framework of indicators focusing on trans inclusion in these five major sections of NSPs: (1) narratives; (2) epidemiological data; (3) monitoring and evaluation (M&E) indicators and targets; (4) activities; and (5) budgets. Results and discussion Within all reviewed NSPs, 65.0% (39/60) mentioned trans people in at least one of the five key sections but only 8.3% (5/60) included trans people in all five key sections. Trans people were more commonly mentioned in the background/narratives of NSPs (61.7%, 37/60) but less commonly included NSP activities (38.3%, 23/60), in M&E indicators and targets (23.7%, 14/60), in epidemiological data (20.0% 12/60), and in NSP budgets (13.3%, 8/60). Countries in the Asia and Pacific region most frequently included trans people in all five key sections (38%, 5/13), while no countries in Eastern and Southern Africa included trans people in all NSP sections. Conclusions This analysis finds substantial gaps in the inclusion of trans populations in NSPs globally. Results highlight the pressing need for states, technical partners, and international funders to engage with trans communities to improve trans‐inclusion in all key sections of NSPs. Trans inclusion in NSPs is an essential step towards reaching the populations most at risk of HIV and ultimately achieving country‐level epidemic control.

To assess challenges with daily oral antiretroviral therapy (ART), we analyzed data for 2389 participants in the 2019 Positive Perspectives survey of people living with HIV in 25 countries. ART-related challenges reported included difficulty swallowing pills (33.1% [790/2389]); stress from daily dosing routine (33.3% [795/2389]); bad memories from daily intake of HIV medication (35.1%[839/2389]), and concern “that having to take pills every day means a greater chance of revealing my HIV status to others” (37.9% [906/2389]). Individuals who felt empowered by daily oral dosing [“taking my pill(s) every day reassures me that my HIV is being kept under control”] had 69% higher odds of optimal overall health (AOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.40–2.04). Conversely, odds of optimal overall health were lower among those who felt daily pill intake “limits my day-to-day life” (AOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.44–0.64). These findings show that there is need for increased flexibility of ART delivery to meet diverse patient needs. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10461-020-03055-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Introduction The worldview in relation to patient care has shifted from conquering diseases to improving overall wellbeing and quality of life. We examined treatment aspirations among people living with HIV (PLHIV). Methods In all, 2389 PLHIV were surveyed in the 25-country 2019 Positive Perspectives Study. Descriptive and multivariable analyses were used to explore attitudes towards treatment. Results Participants were from: Northern America (USA, Canada), 21.8% (520/2389); Europe, 46.8% (1119/2389); and other international regions, 31.4% (750/2389). Factors associated with some level of dissatisfaction with HIV medication among those otherwise fully satisfied with their HIV management included being on a multi-tablet regimen (AOR=2.76; 95% CI: 1.93–3.96), reporting polypharmacy (AOR=2.10; 95% CI: 1.45–3.03), and experiencing side effects from current HIV medication (AOR=2.12; 95% CI: 1.49–3.02). Of seven improvements to HIV medications assessed, the percentage ranking each attribute, as the first or second most important, was: ‘reduced long-term impact on my body’ (46.7%); ‘longer-lasting medicine so I don’t have to take it every day’ (43.1%); ‘fewer side effects’ (40.5%); ‘less HIV medicine each day but just as effective’ (25.4%); ‘less chance of affecting other medicines’ (21.6%); ‘no food restrictions/ requirements’ (14.0%); and ‘smaller pills’ (8.7%). Overall, 77.1% (1842/2389) believed ‘future advances in HIV treatment will improve my overall wellbeing’, 72.2% (1726/2389) were ‘open to taking an HIV treatment composed of fewer medicines’, while 54.7% (1306/2389) expressed openness towards longer-acting (non-daily) HIV medication. Compared to those not fully satisfied with either their HIV medication or management, those fully satisfied with both reported significantly higher prevalence of optimal treatment adherence (89.2% [372/417] vs 69.5% [763/1098]) and optimal overall health (70.3% [293/417] vs 47.8% [525/1098]) (all p

While geographic differences in HIV burden are well documented, less is known about regional differences in perceived treatment needs. To fill this gap, the 2019 Positive Perspectives study of people living with HIV (PLHIV) was conducted in 25 countries across Northern America, Latin America, the Asian region, Europe (EU/Schengen countries), Russia, Australia, and South Africa (n = 2389). Overall mean duration of HIV was 10.1 (SD = 9.6) years. The perception that HIV had a negative impact on day-to-day life was lowest among participants from South Africa (14.0%[25/179]) and highest among participants from the Asian region (55.2%[127/230]). Most of the regional gap in the perception that HIV had a negative impact on daily life was explained by regional differences in medication-related unmet needs, stigma, demographic factors, and comorbidities. The percentage who felt they understood their treatment was highest among participants from Australia (87.5%[105/120]) and lowest among those from Russia (62.0%[93/150]), the Asian region (62.2%[143/230]), and South Africa (62.6%[112/179]). Among participants from Northern America, Europe, and Latin America, the treatment goals with the largest absolute increase in perceived importance, from time of starting treatment to time of survey among those diagnosed for ≥1 year, were minimizing the long term impact of antiretroviral treatment and keeping the number of medicines in their antiretroviral regimen at a minimum. Tailored approaches to care of PLHIV are needed as different regions have different disease burden and treatment needs. Equitable approaches to HIV care are needed across and within regions to ensure that patients' unmet needs and preferences are addressed to improve their overall wellbeing and health-related quality of life.

Modern antiretroviral therapy (ART) has improved the lives of people living with HIV (PLHIV) but currently requires daily adherence. We assessed prevalence and correlates of suboptimal adherence, and measured associations with self-reported health outcomes. Data were from web-based surveys of confirmed HIV+ adults on antiretroviral treatment within 25 countries during 2019 (n = 2389). Suboptimal adherence was a report of ≥1 reason for missing ART ≥5 times within the past month. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations between suboptimal adherence and self-reported overall health and virologic suppression. Overall, 24.1% (575/2389) reported suboptimal adherence, from 10.0% (5/50) in Austria, to 62.0% (31/50) in China. The most common reasons for missing ART ≥5 times in the overall population were feeling depressed/overwhelmed (7.4%, 176/2389), trying to forget about HIV (7.0%, 168/2389), and work (6.1%, 145/2389). Correlates of suboptimal adherence included being heterosexual,50 years old, ≤high school, having gastrointestinal treatment side effects, and privacy concerns. Odds of suboptimal overall health were 1.41 (95%CI, 1.11-1.80), 2.10 (95%CI, 1.65-2.68), and 2.55 (95%CI, 2.00-3.25) among those who reported the maximum number of times missed ART for any reason within the past month as 1, 2-4, or ≥5 times respectively, vs not missing at all. Odds of virologic nonsuppression were 1.80 (95%CI, 1.33-2.45), and 2.24 (95%CI, 1.66-3.02) for 2-4, or ≥5 times of missed ART respectively, vs not missing at all; missing for only 1 time was not significantly associated with virologic nonsuppression. Novel ART strategies designed to improve adherence along with interventions to empower PLHIV and support self-medication may improve health outcomes and quality of life.

The article Physical, Emotional, and Psychosocial Challenges Associated with Daily Dosing of HIV Medications and Their Impact on Indicators of Quality of Life: Findings from the Positive Perspectives Study, written by Patricia de los Rios · Chinyere Okoli · Erika Castellanos · Brent Allan · Benjamin Young · Garry Brough · Marvelous Muchenje · Anton Eremin · Giulio Maria Corbelli · Marta McBritton · W. David Hardy· Nicolas Van de Velde was originally published electronically on the publisher’s internet portal on 17th December 2020 without open access. With the author(s)’ decision to opt for Open Choice the copyright of the article changed on 16th February 2021 to © The Author’s 2021 and the article is forthwith distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution.

Background Despite effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy (ART), some people living with HIV (PLHIV) still face barriers to daily oral ART adherence, including inconvenient scheduling, food requirements, adverse effects, and privacy concerns. We characterized treatment-related physical, emotional, and psychosocial challenges among PLHIV from 25 countries. Methods 2389 PLHIV adults on ART were surveyed in the 2019 Positive Perspectives Study, a standardized, self-reported survey of HIV patients aged 18-84 years on treatment. Data were collected on ART-related perceptions and behaviors. Descriptive and multivariable analyses were performed. Results Most participants were male (67.9%), aged < 50 years (70.7%), and reported viral suppression (74.1%). ART-related challenges included cueing of bad memories (58.4%), disguising HIV pills (57.9%), stress (33.3%), and difficulty swallowing pills (33.1%). Privacy and emotional challenges were generally similar between the USA and Canada (Figure 1). In the pooled sample, those who felt limited by their ART had higher odds of reporting suboptimal overall health (AOR 1.90, 95%CI:1.57-2.29), treatment dissatisfaction (AOR 2.21, 95%CI:1.82-2.69), and suboptimal adherence (AOR 1.90, 95%CI:1.57-2.29). Difficulty swallowing, any side effects, and privacy concerns were associated with increased odds of suboptimal overall health (AOR 2.10, 1.88, and 1.43, respectively) and suboptimal adherence (AOR 2.51, 1.50, and 1.87, respectively; all P< 0.05); results for other outcomes are in Figure 2. Overall, 12.6% (302/2389) had shared their HIV status solely with their primary HIV provider, whereas 6.8% (163/2389) “always” shared their HIV status. Only 52.0% were comfortable discussing ART-related privacy concerns with providers, although 29.0% overall missed ≥1 ART dose in the past month from privacy concerns. Overall, 54.7% preferred a nondaily regimen if their HIV stays suppressed, while 72.3% were open to ART with fewer therapies. Figure 1 Figure 2 Conclusion This study identified several challenges with ART among PLHIV, underscoring the need for increased flexibility of ART delivery to meet diverse patient needs. Addressing these needs may improve overall health outcomes for more PLHIV on therapy. Disclosures Patricia De Los Rios, MSc, GlaxoSmithKline (Shareholder)ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Chinyere Okoli, PharmD, MSc, DIP, ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Benjamin Young, MD, PhD, ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Garry Brough, BA Joint Hons in French/Italian, ViiV Healthcare (Employee, Independent Contractor, Other Financial or Material Support, Speakers Fees and Honoraria) Anton Eremin, MD, ViiV Healthcare (Advisor or Review Panel member) Marvelous Muchenje, BSW, MSc. in Global Health, ViiV Healthcare Canada (Employee) Nicolas Van de Velde, PhD, GlaxoSmithKline (Shareholder)ViiV Healthcare (Employee)