Search

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-psw-10.1177_14789299221148430 for Measuring the Substantive Representation of Women Cross-Nationally: Towards a Composite Index by Ekaterina R Rashkova and Silvia Erzeel in Political Studies Review

ispartof: Studie over de mogelijkheid om online stemmen in te voeren in België pages:1-45 status: published

This article investigates the feminisation of local politics. Starting from the obser‐vation that the representation of women in local electoral politics lags behind theregional and federal level, and taking into account the relevance of local partybranches in the recruitment and selection of candidates for elections, we examinethe extent to which there is an ‘internal’ feminisation of local party branches andhow this links to the ‘external’ feminisation of local electoral politics. Based on sur‐veys among local party chairs, the article maps patterns of feminisation over timeand across parties, investigates problems local branches encounter in the recruit‐ment of candidates for local elections, and analyses the (attitudes towards the)measures taken to further the integration of women in local electoral politics. Weconclude that internal and external feminisation do not always go hand in handand that local politics continues to be a male-dominated political biotope.

ispartof: Etude sur la possibilité d’introduire le vote Internet en Belgique pages:1-43 status: published

This framing paper introduces the symposium on gender and the radical right. With the exception of a few recent studies, gender issues have received little attention in research on the European radical right. The purpose of this symposium is to address that and examine (1) whether radical right parties are still ‘men’s parties’ – parties led and supported primarily by men and (2) to what extent and how women and women’s concerns have been included by these parties. It argues that radical right parties have changed their appeal since their origins in the 1980s. There is now evidence of the fact that radical right parties, at least in some countries, exhibit an active political involvement of women and engage in some representation of women’s concerns. This puts them in a more ‘standardised’ political position vis-à-vis other parties. Given the current lack of focus on this topic, and given the recent gendered changes in radical right parties, this symposium stresses the academic and political importance of studying gender relations in radical right politics.

To date, research on gender and political representation has predominantly centered on women. The assumption that men as a privileged group automatically gain representation is nevertheless problematic. Not only are some (dominant) groups of men better represented than others, we simply do not know what men’s interests are. Up until today, however, no study has actually explored the nature of men’s interests in an empirical way. This paper offers a first attempt to conceptualize and operationalize the notion of men’s interests in empirical research. Based on new and original data from the 2014 PARTIREP voter survey organized in Belgium on the occasion of the 2014 federal and regional elections, we study men and women along political themes, their political visions and their voting behavior. The main question that guides our research is the following: What do gender differences in political themes and visions tell us about male (and female) interests in politics? Next to offering empirical insights into women and men’s political interests, this paper also provides a theoretical contribution to broader debates on group interests. We reflect on our observation that men and women attach importance to the same political themes but have different visions about them, and what this teaches us about “male interests” and “female interests”. We also launch a call for new empirical and theoretical research into men and their interests in politics.

NA

NA

NA