Search

To evaluate the utility of neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) determined at initial diagnosis in predicting advanced disease stage and discriminating between active and stable disease in sarcoidosis. A total of 465 patients with biopsy-proven sarcoidosis (age: 47 years, 70.5% females) were included in this retrospective cross-sectional study. Data on patient demographics, sarcoidosis stage, clinical status (stable and active), anti-inflammatory treatments, complete blood count, and inflammatory markers including erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/mean platelet volume (MPV) ratio were recorded. NLR values were compared by subgrouping the patients according to the stage of sarcoidosis and clinical status, while the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was plotted to determine the role of NLR in the identification of disease activity with the calculation of area under the curve (AUC) and cutoff value via ROC analysis. Overall, active, and stable disease was evident in 36 (7.8%) and 427 (92.2%) patients, respectively. Median NLR values were significantly higher in patients with active disease compared with stable disease (3.31 (2.34–4.31) vs. 2.29 (1.67–3.23), p = 0.005). Advanced sarcoidosis stage was associated with significantly higher NLR values at stages 0, I, II, III and IV, respectively (p = 0.001). ROC analysis revealed an NLR cutoff value of ≥2.39 (AUC (95% CI): 0.70 (0.62–0.79), p < 0.001) to discriminate between active and stable clinic with a sensitivity of 72.0% and specificity of 52.0%. The significantly higher percentage of patients with active vs. stable disease had NLR values ≥2.39 (74.0 vs. 47.0%, p = 0.002). Our findings indicate the potential utility of on-admission NLR values to predict the risk of advanced disease stage and to discriminate between active and stable disease in sarcoidosis. Measured via a simple, readily available, and low-cost test, NLR seems to be a valuable marker for monitoring disease activity and progression.

Objectives The diagnosis of sarcoidosis is frequently challenging, requiring a search for less invasive, more reliable diagnostic methods. The bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) analysis has been used in the differential diagnosis of sarcoidosis for many years with a wide sensitivity and specificity rates. The objective of the study is to investigate whether diagnostic performance of the BALF analysis is altered by clinicoradiological findings of patients with sarcoidosis. Materials and methods The present study is a retrospective, single-center, observational study, designed in a sarcoidosis outpatient clinic in a training hospital. Patients who had undergone the bronchoalveolar lavage BAL procedure at diagnosis were included in the study. Demographics, clinical and detailed chest X-ray, and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) findings at diagnosis were recorded. According to the diagnostic performance, the BALF results were grouped as "diagnostic" and "non-diagnostic," and recorded parameters were compared between the groups. Results Considering the BALF analysis of all the 257 patients, the mean lymphocyte ratio was 41±17.5 (5-80), and the mean CD4/CD8 was 5.5±4.7 (0.1-24.7). The BALF analysis was diagnostic in 56% (n=145) of patients. Diagnostic performance of the procedure did not correlate with any of the demographic data, smoking status, spirometric findings, chest X-ray staging, HRCT findings, and tomography scoring. Extrapulmonary involvement was significantly more frequent in the diagnostic group (66% vs. 34%, p=0.006). Conclusion BALF results signal sarcoidosis in more than half of the patients. The diagnostic role of BALF is greater in patients with extrapulmonary involvement.

Background: Granulomatous inflammation is found in a wide range of diseases, and most commonly associated with sarcoidosis and tuberculosis. Granulomas are pathologically classified into two main groups; necrotic and non-necrotic. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiological, laboratory, and pathological findings of a large patient population with granuloma in biopsy samples, to determine the final diagnostic distribution. Methods: This study was designed as a retrospective, descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study. It was conducted in patients with granulomatous inflammation detected in lung, pleural, mediastinal, hilar, and/or peripheral lymph node biopsies. Demographic information, radiological, microbiological, and laboratory results of the patients were obtained via the information processing system of the hospital. The diagnoses recorded were re-evaluated by at least two experienced clinicians and the final diagnosis distributions were made. Results: A total of 392 patients were included in the study. Non-necrotizing inflammation was detected in 268 patients, and necrotizing granulomatous inflammation was found in 124 patients. The most common cause of non-necrotizing inflammation was sarcoidosis, and tuberculosis in the case of necrotizing inflammation. A total of 77.2% of sarcoidosis patients had non-necrotizing inflammation and 54.3% of the tuberculosis patients had necrotizing inflammation. In the diagnosis distribution of granulomatous inflammation sarcoidosis, mycobacterium infections (especially tuberculosis), sarcoid reaction due to malignancy, pneumoconiosis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis and hypersensitivity pneumonitis were detected, respectively. A total of 392 patients were diagnosed with 13 different diseases. In 15 patients (3.8%) no specific diagnosis could be made. Conclusions: The diagnosis of granulomatous inflammation detected in biopsy samples is common for clinicians and a differential diagnosis is difficult in many cases. A patient’s clinical findings, laboratory results, and radiological appearance, should be evaluated in detail and a final diagnosis only made following a multidisciplinary discussion. The presence of necrosis in tissue samples alone is not a reliable finding for a final diagnosis.

Objective Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a serious pathology with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Studies regarding the efficacy of new inflammatory markers as a predictor of mortality in PE have thus far been limited. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/mean platelet volume (PLT/MPV), and C-reactive protein (CRP) on short-term and long-term mortality in patients with PE. Material and methods A retrospective, observational cohort study was carried out in a tertiary teaching hospital. Patients with PE hospitalized in the pulmonology ward were enrolled. Their characteristics, hemogram parameters, PLR, NLR, CRP levels, PLT/MPV on admission, and mortality were recorded. The predictive accuracies of inflammatory markers were determined through receiver operating characteristic curves. The risk factors for mortality were further analyzed with Cox regression analysis. Results A total of 828 patients with PE were included in the study. The 1-month mortality was 1%, and the 1-year mortality was 8.5%. An NLR value above 6 was associated with an almost 13-fold increase in short-term (30-day) mortality. We found that an NLR above 3.15 and age were independent risk factors for long-term (1-year) mortality. The other inflammatory markers, namely PLR and CRP, were not found to be associated with long-term mortality. Conclusion PE is a serious condition in the elderly. Elevated NLR values appear to be a good and feasible predictor of inflammation, which can be correlated with higher mortality over both the short-term and long-term periods.

Background The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of nebulized steroid (NS) with systemic corticosteroids (SC) and to determine optimal NS dose in the treatment of patients with COPD exacerbations requiring hospitalization. Material/Methods The study was a randomized, parallel design trial. Eligible patients (n=86) were randomly allocated to 1 of the 3 treatment groups: parenteral corticosteroid (PS) (n=33), 4 mg (NB) (n=27), or 8 mg NB (n=26). Partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2), carbon dioxide (PaCO2), pH, and oxygen saturation (SaO2) were evaluated at baseline, 24 h, 48 h, and discharge. Airway obstruction (forced vital capacity [FVC] and forced expiratory volume 1 s [FEV1]) was evaluated at admission and discharge. Results There were no significant differences between the groups for all parameters at all time periods, except for higher FEV1 value in the 8-mg NB group at baseline. In groups, significant differences were determined for FVC, FEV1, PaO2, and SaO2 (p