Search

Manometric assessment of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and esophageal body is the key to a better understanding of the mechanics of antireflux surgery (ARS) and maximizing its benefits while minimizing adverse outcomes. However, there is an attitude of uncertainty regarding the necessity of esophageal motility prior to ARS among some surgeons. This evidence-based review highlights the critical role of manometry in the preoperative workup for patients undergoing ARS. It also discusses how manometry can detect findings associated with favorable outcomes or the risk of postoperative dysphagia. Manometric data can be used for risk stratification and the prediction of outcomes, aiding the surgeon in matching an operation to the specific physiology of each individual patient.

Background/Aims Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) enables the comprehensive evaluation of the esophageal motor function. However, protocols are not uniform and clinical practices vary widely among institutions. This study aims to understand the current HRM practice in Korea. Methods The survey was sent via email through the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility. The questions covered descriptive information, preparation, techniques, analysis, and reporting of esophageal HRM. Results The survey was completed in 32 (74.4%) out of 43 centers, including 24 tertiary and 8 secondary referral centers. Of the 32 centers, 25 (78.1%) performed HRM in a sitting position, while 7 centers (21.9%) reported performing HRM in a supine position. All the centers utilized single wet swallows as a standard, but the volume, frequency, and interval between swallows varied widely. Sixteen centers (50.0%) applied adjunctive tests, including multiple rapid swallows (n = 16) and rapid drink challenges (n = 9). Parameters assessed and documented in the report were similar. In addition to the assessment of the esophagogastric junction and esophageal body, 27 centers (84.8%) and 18 centers (56.3%) included measurements for the upper esophageal sphincter and the pharynx, respectively, in the HRM protocol. Conclusions We found a variation in the available HRM practice among centers, even though they broadly agreed in the data analysis. Efforts are needed to develop a standardized protocol for HRM measurement. (J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021;27:347-353)

Phenotypes of achalasia are based on esophageal body pressurization during swallow. The reasons that lead to pressurized waves are still unclear. This study aims to evaluate manometric parameters that may determine pressurized waves in patients with achalasia. A total of 100 achalasia high-resolution manometry tests were reviewed. We measured before each swallow: upper esophageal sphincter (UES) basal pressure, esophageal length, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) basal pressure, LES length, gastric and thoracic pressure, transdiaphragmatic pressure gradient and the LES retention pressure (LES basal pressure-TPG); during swallow: UES pressure, UES residual pressure, UES recovery time, LES relaxation pressure, gastric and thoracic pressure, transdiaphragmatic pressure gradient and after swallow: esophageal length, LES length, wave pressure, gastric and thoracic pressure and transdiaphragmatic gradient pressure. Univariate analysis showed in pressurized waves before swallow: higher thoracic, UES and LES basal pressure, longer LES length and decrease in LES retention pressure; during swallow: higher thoracic, gastric and UES pressure, higher UES and LES relaxation pressure and after swallow: higher thoracic and gastric pressure. Multivariate analysis in pressurized waves showed as significant before swallow: thoracic and UES basal pressure; during swallow: thoracic, gastric and UES pressure, UES residual pressure and UES recovery time and after swallow: thoracic pressure. Basal esophageal pressurization and the UES are independent variables that may be associated with pressurized waves.

To evaluate the impact of MSA on lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and esophageal body using high resolution impedance manometry.MSA is an effective treatment in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, but there is limited data on its impact on esophageal functional physiology.Patients who underwent MSA were approached 1-year after surgery for objective foregut testing consists of upper endoscopy, esophagram, high resolution impedance manometry, and esophageal pH-monitoring. Postoperative data were then compared to the preoperative measurements.A total of 100 patients were included in this study. At a mean follow up of 14.9(10.1) months, 72% had normalization of esophageal acid exposure. MSA resulted in an increase in mean LES resting pressure [29.3(12.9) vs 25(12.3), P0.001]. This was also true for LES overall length [2.9(0.6) vs 2.6(0.6), P = 0.02] and intra-abdominal length [1.2(0.7) vs 0.8(0.8), P0.001]. Outflow resistance at the EGJ increased after MSA as demonstrated by elevation in intrabolus pressure (19.6 vs 13.5 mmHg, P0.001) and integrated relaxation pressure (13.5 vs 7.2, P0.001). MSA was also associated with an increase in distal esophageal body contraction amplitude [103.8(45.4) vs 94.1(39.1), P = 0.015] and distal contractile integral [2647.1(2064.4) vs 2099.7(1656.1), P0.001]. The percent peristalsis and incomplete bolus clearance remained unchanged (P = 0.47 and 0.08, respectively).MSA results in improvement in the LES manometric characteristics. Although the device results in an increased outflow resistance at the EGJ, the compensatory increase in the force of esophageal contraction will result in unaltered esophageal peristaltic progression and bolus clearance.

High resolution manometry (HRM), developed from conventional manometry, is the gold standard for assessment of esophageal motor function worldwide. The Chicago Classification, now in its fourth iteration, is the modern standard for HRM categorization of esophageal motility disorders. The HRM protocol has expanded from the original 10 supine swallow standard, to include upright swallows, and provocative maneuvers such as multiple rapid swallows, rapid drink challenge and standardized test meal. Impedance has been incorporated into HRM for visualization of bolus clearance. Futhermore, barium radiography and functional lumen imaging probe complement HRM when evidence of esophagogastric junction obstruction is inconclusive. The biggest impact of HRM is in the improved diagnosis and subtyping of achalasia spectrum disorders, with implications on management. Spastic disorders and absent contractility are better characterized. Within the reflux spectrum, HRM provides definition of morphology and tone of the esophagogastric junction, and assesses integrity of esophageal body peristalsis, which have pathophysiologic implications for reflux and its clearance. HRM provides characterization of behavioral disorders such as supragastric belching and rumination syndrome, which can mimic reflux disease. Thus, HRM has revolutionized the evaluation of esophageal motor function, and has expanded the utility of esophageal manometry in clinical practice.

The goal of this study was to conceptualize and compute measures of “mechanical work” done by the esophagus using data generated during functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) panometry and compare work done during secondary peristalsis among patients and controls. Eighty-five individuals were evaluated with a 16-cm FLIP during sedated endoscopy, including asymptomatic controls (n = 14) and those with achalasia subtypes I, II, and III (n = 15, each); gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD; n = 13); eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE; n = 9); and systemic sclerosis (SSc; n = 5). The FLIP catheter was positioned to have its distal segment straddling the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) during stepwise distension. Two metrics of work were assessed: “active work” (during bag volumes ≤ 40 mL where contractility generates substantial changes in lumen area) and “work capacity” (for bag volumes ≥ 60 mL when contractility cannot substantially alter the lumen area). Controls showed median [interquartile range (IQR)] of 7.3 (3.6–9.2) mJ of active work and 268.6 (225.2–332.3) mJ of work capacity. Patients with all achalasia subtypes, GERD, and SSc showed lower active work done than controls (P ≤ 0.003). Patients with achalasia subtypes I and II, GERD, and SSc had lower work capacity compared with controls (P < 0.001, 0.004, 0.04, and 0.001, respectively). Work capacity was similar between controls and patients with achalasia type III and EoE. Mechanical work of the esophagus differs between healthy controls and patient groups with achalasia, EoE, SSc, and GERD. Further studies are needed to fully explore the utility of this approach, but these work metrics would be valuable for device design (artificial esophagus), to measure the efficacy of peristalsis, to gauge the physiological state of the esophagus, and to comment on its pumping effectiveness. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) panometry assesses esophageal response to distension and provides a simultaneous assessment of pressure and dimension during contractility. This enables an objective assessment of “mechanical work” done by the esophagus. Eighty-five individuals were evaluated, and two work metrics were computed for each subject. Controls showed greater values of work compared with individuals with achalasia, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and systemic sclerosis (SSc). These values can quantify the mechanical behavior of the distal esophagus and assist in the estimation of muscular integrity.

BACKGROUND: Chronic opioid use can induce esophageal dysfunction with symptoms resembling achalasia and a manometric pattern of esophagogastric junction-outflow obstruction (EGJ-OO). However, the effect of opioids in acute setting on pharyngeal function and esophageal body contractility has not been investigated. METHODS: After positioning the high-resolution impedance manometry (HRiM) catheter, codeine (60 mg) or placebo (glucose syrup) was infused intragastrically. Forty-five minutes post-infusion, participants received liquid, semi-solid, and solid boluses to assess esophageal and pharyngeal function. HRiM analysis was performed adhering to the Chicago classification v3.0. (CC v3.0). Pressure flow analysis (PFA) for the esophageal body and the pharynx was performed using the SwallowGateway™ online platform. KEY RESULTS: Nineteen healthy volunteers (HV) [5 male; age 38.3] were included. After codeine administration, higher integrated relaxation pressure 4 s values resulted in significantly reduced deglutitive EGJ relaxation and distal latency was significantly shorter. Distal contractility was similar in both conditions. Bolus flow resistance at the EGJ and distention pressures increased significantly after codeine infusion. Based on CC v3.0, acute infusion of codeine induced EGJ-OO in six HV (p = 0.0003 vs. placebo). Codeine administration induced no significant alterations in any of the pharyngeal PFA metrics. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: In HV, acute administration of codeine increased bolus resistance at the EGJ secondary to induced incomplete EGJ relaxation leading to major motility disorders in a subset of subjects including EGJ-OO. However, an acute single dose of codeine did not affect motility or bolus flow in pharynx and UES. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03784105. ispartof: NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY vol:33 issue:5 ispartof: location:England status: published

Because it offers real-time assessment, barium esophagram should be the modality of choice when studying esophageal peristalsis. However, no standard reporting method is available for BE results. Presently, peristaltic disorders are defined according to high-resolution manometry (HRM), but HRM findings do not correlate with clinical symptoms. The aim of this study was to stratify esophageal peristaltic function via standardized evaluation of BE, and to define the association between esophageal peristalsis and dysphagia and regurgitation. Methods After IRB approval, a prospectively maintained database was reviewed for patients who underwent both HRM and BE from 08/01/2016 to 12/31/2019. Patients with conditions associated with outflow impairment were excluded. BEs were re-examined in blinded fashion and assigned subjective scores (0, 1, or 2) for dilation grade (DG) and contractility grade (CG). Patients were categorized according to the sum of the DG and CG: Group A = 0, Group B = 1–2, and Group C = 3–4. Mean distal contractile integral (DCI), number of failed contractions on HRM, and number of patients with dysphagia/regurgitation in each group were analyzed and compared. Results In all, 124 patients were included. The mean DCI (mmHg*cm*s) was 2539.1 ± 1357.8 in Group A, 884.4 ± 916.9 in Group B, and 77.4 ± 192.3 in Group C (p Conclusion The combined DG and CG allowed us to identify the patients with a grade of peristaltic disfunction that was significantly more associated with dysphagia or regurgitation (Group C). However, in order to achieve a clearer definition of the different peristaltic disfunction levels according to their propensity to cause dysphagia or regurgitation, a more objective assessment of both DG and CG should be provided; therefore, further studies are required.

Peristaltic disorders of the esophageal body have been categorized according to how they appear on high-resolution manometry. Abnormalities in peristalsis may lead to abnormal esophageal clearance and dysphagia. The aim of our retrospective analysis was to study bolus transit patterns on barium esophagogram in patients with various grades of esophageal body peristalsis as diagnosed by high-resolution manometry. Methods After Institutional Review Board approval, we queried an esophageal center database to identify patients with normal lower esophageal sphincter parameters. Patients with jackhammer esophagus, esophageal spasm, previous foregut surgery, hiatal hernia, and fragmented peristalsis were excluded. Remaining patients were divided into 11 groups based on their percentages of normal swallows out of 10 swallows (0%–100% swallows normal, DCI > 450 mmHg.s.cm). All previously obtained video esophagograms were re-evaluated in blinded fashion. Bolus transit time through the esophagus was measured in upright and prone positions, using live time stamps at the entry and exit of the bolus. ANOVA and χ2 were used. Results In total, 146 patients were included in the analysis. 73 (50%) were men. Mean age and body mass index were 58.4 ± 14.7 years and 22.8 ± 10.4 kg/m2, respectively. Bolus transit time in prone-position swallows increased in tandem with increases in number of abnormal swallows (11.3 ± 3.7, 22 ± 15.5, 29.5 ± 24.3, 42.7 ± 39.5, 42.4 ± 46.9, 64 ± 70.8, 59.4 ± 34.6, 58.8 ± 37.9, 110 ± 66.6, 83.2 ± 49.6 and 105.6 ± 72.5 seconds, p Conclusion Bolus transit time in prone-position swallows progressively increases as percentage of normal swallows decreases. Further work associated with symptoms to define a cutoff between normal and ineffective peristalsis would be useful.

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and high-resolution manometry (HRM) can be used in the evaluation of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) for frequent symptoms such as dysphagia. However, the role of these examinations is not clear. The aim of this study was to objectively evaluate the subjective symptoms of EoE patients with EUS and HRM. Patients who had endoscopic findings indicative of EoE and matched the number of eosinophil infiltrates used as diagnostic criteria were recruited between September 2018 and August 2019. Evaluable subjects underwent EUS and HRM and completed the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) questionnaire. The esophageal wall thickness (evaluated with EUS) and HRM parameters between patients with and without symptoms were retrospectively compared. Symptomatic patients were re-examined using EUS and HRM 6 months after treatment. A total of 35 patients (29 males, median age of 49 years) were divided into symptomatic (20 patients) and asymptomatic groups (15 patients). The esophageal wall was thicker, and the distal contractile integral (DCI) values were higher in the symptomatic group (P

Achalasia is a neurodegenerative condition resulting in abnormal lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and impaired upstream esophageal body peristalsis.1 The pathophysiology and natural history of achalasia remain unclear, and evaluation of the histopathogenesis of achalasia has traditionally been challenging because the esophageal wall muscularis propria is not typically accessible via routine endoscopic biopsies.

The authors presents a clinical case: 1 year and four month old aged patient with an accidental ingestion of sharp foreign body complicated with mediastinitis, the clinical symptoms being masked by association of an upper respiratory tract infection.

Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) describes esophageal body hypomotility detected during manometry. The concept of IEM was first established in 1997 using standard manometry, and the definition has changed over time due to the advent of high-resolution manometry (HRM). The latest Chicago Classification (version 3.0) defines IEM during HRM as frequent (≥50%) weak distal esophageal contractions (distal contractile integral (DCI) < 450 mmHg·cm·s).

Background/Aims Achalasia is a chronic, progressive motility disorder of the esophagus. The sigmoid-type achalasia is an advanced stage of achalasia characterized by severe dilatation and tortuous angulation of the esophageal body. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been reported to provide excellent clinical outcomes for achalasia, including the sigmoid type, but the restoration of esophageal morphology and function remain poorly described. The aim of our study is to investigate esophageal restoration after POEM for sigmoid-type achalasia. Methods From 98 patients with achalasia who underwent POEM in the Yonsei University Health System from 2013 to 2018, we recruited 13 patients with sigmoid-type achalasia (7 male; mean age 53.3 years) and assessed morphological and manometric changes in the esophagus. Results Clinical success (Eckardt score < 3) was achieved in all cases. After POEM, the average angle of esophageal tortuosity became more obtuse (91.5° vs 114.6°, P = 0.046), esophageal body diameter decreased (67.6 vs 49.8 mm, P = 0.002), and esophagogastric junction opening widened (6.4 vs 9.5 mm, P = 0.048). Patients whose esophageal tortuosity did not improve had longer durations of symptoms than patients with improvement (80.2 vs 636 months, P < 0.001). An absence of peristalsis was observed in all patients pre- and post-POEM. Conclusions POEM resulted in excellent clinical outcomes and morphologic improvement in sigmoid-type achalasia. These results suggest that the improvement of esophageal tortuosity through POEM reflects a reduced esophageal burden.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To present the latest developments in esophageal motility testing and summarize the current paradigm of esophageal motility disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: While high-resolution esophageal pressure topography interpreted according to the Chicago Classification represents the gold standard to evaluate esophageal motility, recent studies highlight the additional value of novel manometric applications. Novel applications include provocative measures to assess for obstructive physiology at the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), esophageal peristaltic reserve, and rumination and supragastric belching disorders. Furthermore high-resolution impedance manometry provides assessment of bolus flow in relation to pressure changes. Distinct from manometry, the endolumenal functional lumen imaging probe examines esophageal motor response to distension to provide complementary and alternative data with regards to EGJ function and esophageal body motor function. Barium esophagram with timed swallow and barium tablet continues to be an important esophageal motility test. Furthermore, current use of multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring extends beyond reflux monitoring to measure reflux clearance and esophageal epithelial integrity. SUMMARY: The diagnostic armamentarium for esophageal motility disorders has expanded tremendously to include a multitude of sophisticated tools. Advancements in diagnostic technology and understanding of esophageal physiology have shifted the field to more precisely characterize esophageal motility and guide phenotype driven management.

As surgeons address foregut disease in their patients with different procedures, a review of relevant anatomy and physiology of the esophagus and LES will complement discussion with their patients and decision-making. As will be apparent in this chapter, the esophagus is more than a conduit that directs liquids and food to other organs, deters reflux, and serves as a passageway for radiographic contrast or endoscopes to define more distant foregut disease/disorders. Instead, the esophagus is a very complex organ whose function is directed by CNS and intrinsic esophageal control that is implemented by skeletal and smooth muscle.

High-resolution manometry is the gold standard test for evaluation of esophageal motility, which includes both the efficacy of esophageal body contractility and esophagogastric junction relaxation in response to swallowing. It is the best study for the work-up of patients with dysphagia and noncardiac chest pain, in whom a mechanical obstruction has been ruled out via upper endoscopy. As such, manometric parameters form the basis for diagnosis of major and minor esophageal motility disorders, including achalasia. This chapter will describe in detail the technical aspects of performing and analyzing a high-resolution manometry study. The current Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders serves as a basis for interpretation of these studies and classification of patients into diagnostic categories. Based on manometric findings, the resulting major and minor motility disorders and their treatments are discussed. Lastly, the use of manometry in the preoperative evaluation of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease is explored, as well as the use of manometry for selective “tailoring” of fundoplication for patients undergoing antireflux surgery.

Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is currently the gold standard for the evaluation of esophageal motility. The Chicago Classification categorizes the esophageal motility disorders based on the HRM findings. Achalasia and esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction are characterized by a median integrated relaxation pressure that is higher than in healthy subjects. Major motility disorders are aperistalsis, distal esophageal spasm, and hypercontractile esophagus. Minor motility disorders include ineffective esophageal motility and fragmented peristalsis.

Background Distensibility evaluation of the esophageal body using the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) offers an objective measure to characterize patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), though this analysis may be limited by unrecognized catheter movement and esophageal contractility. The aims of this study were to report novel FLIP analytic methods of esophageal distensibility measurement in EoE and to assess the effect of contractility. Methods Nine healthy controls (six female; ages 20–49) and 20 EoE patients (four female; ages 19–64; grouped by degree of distension-mediated contractility identified on FLIP) were evaluated with a 16-cm FLIP device during step-wise balloon distension during upper endoscopy. A distensibility plateau (DP) was generated using multiple methods to identify the narrowest esophageal body diameter: (i) wavelet decomposition (WD), (ii) maximal diameter (MD), and (iii) FLIP Analytics software. Key Results Distensibility was reduced in EoE patients compared with controls using the WD (p = 0.002) and MD (p = 0.001) methods; a trend was detected using the FLIP Analytics method (p = 0.055). Significant intra-subject differences were detected between methods among both patients and controls (p-values

The aims of this study were to 1) examine pharyngoesophageal and cardiorespiratory responses to provoking pharyngeal stimuli, and 2) to determine potential contributory factors impacting heart rate (HR) changes to provide insight into cardiorespiratory events occurring in preterm infants. Forty-eight neonates (19 females and 29 males, born at 27.7 ± 0.5 wk; mean ± SE) pending discharge on full oral feeds were studied at 38.7 ± 0.2 wk postmenstrual age using concurrent pharyngoesophageal manometry, electrocardiography, respiratory inductance plethysmography, and nasal airflow thermistor. Pharyngoesophageal and cardiorespiratory responses (prevalence, latency, and duration) were quantified upon abrupt pharyngeal water stimuli (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 ml in triplicate). Mixed linear models and generalized estimating equations were used for comparisons between HR changes. Contributory factors included stimulus characteristics and subject characteristics. Of 338 pharyngeal stimuli administered, HR increased in 23 (7%), decreased in 108 (32%), and remained stable in 207 (61%) neonates. HR decrease resulted in repetitive swallowing, increased respiratory-rhythm disturbance, and decreased esophageal propagation rates (all, P < 0.05). HR responses were related to stimulus volume, stimulus flow rate, and extreme prematurity (all, P < 0.05). In preterm infants, HR remains stable in a majority of pharyngeal provocations. HR decrease, due to pharyngeal stimulation, is related to aberrant pharyngoesophageal motility and respiratory dysregulation and is magnified by prematurity. We infer that the observed aberrant responses across digestive, respiratory, and cardiovascular systems are related to maladaptive maturation of the parasympathetic nervous system. These aberrant responses may provide diagnostic clues for risk stratification of infants with troublesome cardiorespiratory events and swallowing difficulty.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Cardiorespiratory rhythms concurrent with pharyngeal, upper esophageal sphincter, and esophageal body responses were examined upon pharyngeal provocation in preterm-born infants who were studied at full-term maturation. Decreased heart rate (HR) was associated with extreme preterm birth and stimulus flow/volume. With HR decrease responses, aerodigestive reflex abnormalities were present, characterized by prolonged respiratory rhythm disturbance, repetitive multiple swallowing, and poor esophageal propagation. Promoting esophageal peristalsis may be a potential therapeutic target.

Background and study aims Detecting esophageal achalasia remains a challenge. We describe the diagnostic utility of corona appearance, a novel endoscopic finding specific to esophageal achalasia. Patients and methods Corona appearance and seven conventional endoscopic findings were compared for sensitivity and consistency (κ-value) among 53 untreated esophageal achalasia patients who underwent endoscopy at our hospital. The following criteria had to be met during lower esophageal sphincter examination using the attached ST Hood short-type for positive corona appearance: A) congestion inside the hood, B) ischemic change around the hood, and C) palisade vessels outside the hood. Results Corona appearance had the highest sensitivity (91%; κ-value, 0.71). Other findings in descending order of sensitivity included 1) functional stenosis of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ; 86%; κ-value, 0.58), 2) mucosal thickening and whitish change (71%; κ-value, 0.27), 3) abnormal contraction of the esophageal body (59%; κ-value, 0.32), 4) dilation of the esophageal lumen (58%; κ-value, 0.53), 5) liquid remnant (57%; κ-value, 0.51), 6) Wrapping around EGJ (49%; κ-value, 0.14), and 7) food remnant (30%; κ-value, 0.88). Even in 22 patients with poor (grade 1) intraluminal expansion, corona appearance had highest sensitivity (88%) compared to other endoscopic findings (κ-value, 0.63). Conclusions Among endoscopic findings using a ST Hood short-type to diagnose esophageal achalasia, corona appearance had the highest sensitivity and its consistency (κ-value) among endoscopists was substantial compared to other endoscopic findings. Similar results were obtained for esophageal achalasia cases with poor expansion. Endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal achalasia with hood attached is useful.

BACKGROUND Esophageal stasis is a hallmark of achalasia. Timed barium esophagogram (TBE) is used to measure stasis but exposes patients to ionizing radiation. It is suggested that esophageal stasis can be objectified on high-resolution manometry (HRM) as well using a rapid drinking challenge test (RDC). We aimed to assess esophageal stasis in achalasia by a RDC during HRM and compare this to TBE. METHODS Thirty healthy subjects (15 male, age 40 [IQR 34-49]) and 90 achalasia patients (53 male, age 47 [36-59], 30 untreated/30 treated symptomatic/30 treated asymptomatic) were prospectively included to undergo HRM with RDC and TBE. RDC was performed by drinking 200 mL of water. Response to RDC was measured by basal and relaxation pressure in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) and esophageal pressurization during the last 5 seconds. KEY RESULTS EGJ basal and relaxation pressure during RDC were higher in achalasia compared to healthy subjects (overall P

Secondary achalasia may result from diseases that either infiltrate or compress the lower esophageal sphincter to create an increased high-pressure zone and subsequent esophageal body changes. With bariatric surgery, a potential high-pressure zone is created by a sleeve, band, or bypass just distal to the esophagus. We report four patients who years after a bariatric procedure developed dysphagia followed by esophageal body radiographic and/or manometric features of achalasia. In addition, each of these patients responded symptomatically to endoscopic or surgical therapy either which lowered this high-pressure zone. Furthermore, review of prior cases in the literature suggests this has occurred before. Physicians should be aware of this association but further study is needed on its true prevalence.

Esophageal body and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) motor abnormalities are well characterized by the Chicago Classification version 3.0, which identifies disorders under the broad categories of EGJ outflow obstruction, major motor disorders not encountered in health, and minor motor disorders that can be associated with bolus transit abnormalities. However, abnormalities of the esophageal body peristaltic wave (contraction wave abnormalities), breaks in peristaltic integrity, and morphologic and motor EGJ abnormalities can be encountered when esophageal motor function is designated normal under the Chicago Classification. Other nonspecific motor abnormalities can be encountered in supragastric belching and rumination. This chapter elaborates these nonspecific disorders of esophageal and EGJ motor function, and describes potential relationships to symptoms.

We describe a new video-assisted technique for the management of a giant midesophageal diverticulum using a single 5-cm port. It maintained the same principles of the traditional open technique as diverticulectomy, myotomy, and fundoplication. The better visualization of the main esophageal body, diverticulum, and esophagogastric junction and the better alignment of the stapler cartridge to the longitudinal axis of the esophagus are all technical factors supporting our procedure. Heavily calcified mediastinal lymph nodes and diffuse pleural adhesions are the main contraindications. However, future experiences are needed before this technique can be recommended as acceptable treatment. (C) 2017 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Current parameters of the Chicago classification include assessment of the esophageal body (contraction vigour and peristalsis), lower esophageal sphincter relaxation pressure, and intra-bolus pressure pattern. Esophageal disorders include achalasia, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, major disorders of peristalsis, and minor disorders of peristalsis. Sub-classification of achalasia in types I, II, and III seems to be useful to predict outcomes and choose the optimal treatment approach. The real clinical significance of other new parameters and disorders is still under investigation.

Impedance planimetry measures tissue wall distensibility as a function of pressure and cross-sectional area. Recent interest in this technique’s relevance to the gastrointestinal tract has been accelerated by the availability of the functional lumen imaging probe, a catheter-based system that dynamically quantitates these biomechanical properties. Herein, we review the device’s particular utility in the setting of esophageal pathology, including processes affecting the esophageal body as well as the upper and lower esophageal sphincters. An expanding suite of disease-specific indications for impedance planimetry includes achalasia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and eosinophilic esophagitis. The technique has also demonstrated a role in the intraoperative guidance of therapy and in the definition of hitherto unrecognized patterns of esophageal dysmotility. Device-specific technology remains in active evolution, which, in conjunction with progressively larger datasets, sets the stage for broader clinical applicability in the near future.