Search

Background: The timing and selection of optimal candidates for mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge valve repair remains to be fully determined, especially in cases with severely depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The objective of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of myocardial strain (LVGLS) in this setting. Methods: Retrospectively, 172 consecutive patients with LVEF ≤40% and severe MR treated with MitraClip were included. Four groups were generated according to the LVEF (

Objectives To test whether local hemolysis is a potential mechanism of saline-induced coronary hyperemia. Background Absolute coronary flow can be measured by intracoronary continuous thermodilution of saline through the lateral side holes of a dedicated infusion cathete. A saline infusion rate at 15–20 mL/min induces an immediate, steady-state, maximal microvascular vasodilation. The mechanism of this hyperemic response remains unclear. Methods Twelve patients undergoing left and right catheterization were included. The left coronary artery and the coronary sinus were selectively cannulated. Absolute resting and hyperemic coronary flow were measured by continuous intracoronary thermodilution. Arterial and venous samples were collected from the coronary artery and the coronary sinus in five phases: baseline (BL); resting flow measurement (Rest, saline infusion at 10 mL/min); hyperemia (Hyperemia,saline infusion at 20 mL/min); post-hyperemia (Post-Hyperemia, two minutes after the cessation of saline infusion); and control phase (Control, during infusion of saline through the guide catheter at 30 mL/min). Results Hemolysis was visually detected only in the centrifugated venous blood samples collected during the Hyperemia phase. As compared to Rest, during Hyperemia both LDH (131.50±21.89 U/dL [Rest] and 258.33±57.40 U/dL [Hyperemia], p Conclusions Saline-induced hyperemia through a dedicated intracoronary infusion catheter is associated with hemolysis. Vasodilatory compounds released locally, like ATP, are likely ultimately responsible for localized microvascular vasodilation. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Introduction The bolus thermodilution-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) has emerged over years as the standard of reference to invasively define coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). However, the technique still presents some limitations, mainly related to the fact that manual injection of saline bolus accounts for some variance in the measurements. Continuous intracoronary thermodilution has been recently introduced as a tool to directly quantify absolute coronary flow and microvascular resistance both at rest and during hyperemia and has shown to be safe and operator independent. Microvascular resistance reserve (MRR), derived from continuous thermodilution, has been validated as novel index specific for microcirculation and independent from myocardial mass. Purpose To compare head-to-head the intra-observer repeatability of bolus and continuous thermodilution for assessing microvascular function. Methods Patients undergoing coronary angiography in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease were prospectively enrolled. Bolus and continuous intracoronary thermodilution measurements were performed in duplicates in the left anterior descending artery (LAD). Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo first bolus thermodilution or first continuous thermodilution assessment. Results A total of 102 patients were enrolled. Average FFR was 0.86±0.06. Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR) calculated with continuous thermodilution (CFRthermo) was significantly lower than bolus thermodilution-derived CFR (CFRbolus) (2.63±0.65 and 3.29±1.17, respectively, p Conclusion Continuous intracoronary thermodilution has a higher repeatability than bolus thermodilution in the assessment of CMD.

AIM: Microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) as derived from continuous intracoronary thermodilution specifically quantifies microvasculature function. As originally described, the technique necessitates reinstrumentation of the artery and manual reprogramming of the infusion pump when performing resting and hyperemic measurements. To simplify and to render this procedure operator-independent, we developed a fully automated method. The aim of the present study is to validate the automated procedure against the originally described one.METHODS AND RESULTS: For the automated procedure, an infusion pump was preprogrammed to allow paired resting-hyperemic thermodilution assessment without interruption. To validate the accuracy of this new approach, 20 automated measurements were compared to those obtained in the same vessels with conventional paired resting-hyperemic thermodilution measurements (i.e., with a sensor pullback at each infusion rate and manual reprogramming of the infusion pump). A close correlation between the conventional and the automated measuring technique was found for resting flow (Qrest : r = 0.89, mean bias = 2.52; SD = 15.47), hyperemic flow (Qhyper : r = 0.88, mean bias = -2.65; SD = 27.96), resting microvascular resistance (Rμ-rest : r = 0.90, mean bias = 52.14; SD = 228.29), hyperemic microvascular resistance Rμ-hyper : r = 0.92, mean bias = 12.95; SD = 57.80), and MRR (MRR: r = 0.89, mean bias = 0.04, SD = 0.59). Procedural time was significantly shorter with the automated method (5'25″ ± 1'23″ vs. 4'36″​​​​​​​ ± 0'33″​​​​​​​, p = 0.013).CONCLUSION: Continuous intracoronary thermodilution-derived measurements of absolute flow, absolute resistance, and MRR can be fully automated. This further shortens and simplifies the procedure when performing paired resting-hyperemic measurements.

ObjectiveLeft atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus has heretofore been considered a contraindication to percutaneous LAA closure (LAAC). Data regarding its management are very limited. The aim of this study was to analyse the medical and invasive treatment of patients referred for LAAC in the presence of LAA thrombus.MethodsThis multicentre observational registry included 126 consecutive patients referred for LAAC with LAA thrombus on preprocedural imaging. Treatment strategies included intensification of antithrombotic therapy (IAT) or direct LAAC. The primary and secondary endpoints were a composite of bleeding, stroke and death at 18 months, and procedural success, respectively.ResultsIAT was the preferred strategy in 57.9% of patients, with total thrombus resolution observed in 60.3% and 75.3% after initial and subsequent IAT, respectively. Bleeding complications and stroke during IAT occurred in 9.6% and 2.9%, respectively, compared with 3.8% bleeding and no embolic events in the direct LAAC group before the procedure. Procedural success was 90.5% (96.2% vs 86.3% in direct LAAC and IAT group, respectively, p=0.072), without cases of in-hospital thromboembolic complications. The primary endpoint occurred in 29.3% and device-related thrombosis was found in 12.8%, without significant difference according to treatment strategy. Bleeding complications at 18 months occurred in 22.5% vs 10.5% in the IAT and direct LAAC group, respectively (p=0.102).ConclusionIn the presence of LAA thrombus, IAT was the initial management strategy in half of our cohort, with initial thrombus resolution in 60% of these, but with a relatively high bleeding rate (~10%). Direct LAAC was feasible, with high procedural success and absence of periprocedural embolic complications. However, a high rate of device-related thrombosis was detected during follow-up.

Aims Deferring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with non-significant stenoses based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) is associated with favourable clinical outcomes up to 15 years. Whether this holds true in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is unclear. To investigate whether FFR provides adjunctive clinical benefit compared to coronary angiography in deferring revascularization of patients with intermediate coronary stenoses and reduced LVEF. Methods and results Consecutive patients (n = 4577) with reduced LVEF (≤50%) undergoing coronary angiography between 2002 and 2010 were screened. We eventually included patients with at least one intermediate coronary stenosis (diameter stenosis ≥40%) in whom revascularization was deferred based either on angiography plus FFR (FFR-guided) or angiography alone (angiography-guided). The primary endpoint of the study was the cumulative incidence of all-cause death at 10 years. The secondary endpoint [the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)], was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, any revascularization and stroke. A total of 840 patients were included (206 in the FFR-guided and 634 in the angiography-guided group). Median clinical follow-up was 7 years [IQR: (3.22–11.08)]. After 1:1 propensity score matching, baseline characteristics between the two groups were similar. All-cause death was significantly lower in the FFR-guided group compared with the angiography-guided group [94 (45.6%) vs. 119 (57.8%), HR: 0.65 (95% CI: 0.49–0.85), P Conclusions In patients with reduced LVEF, deferring revascularization of intermediate coronary stenoses based on FFR is associated with a lower incidence of death and MACCE at 10 years.

Aims Absolute coronary blood flow can be measured by intracoronary continuous thermodilution of saline through the lateral side holes of a dedicated infusion catheter placed in the proximal segment of the coronary artery. A room-temperature saline infusion rate at 15–20 ml/min induces an immediate, steady-state, maximal microvascular vasodilation. The mechanism of this hyperemic response remains unclear. The aim of the present study is to test whether local haemolysis is a potential mechanism of coronary hyperaemia. Methods and results Twelve patients undergoing left and right catheterization were included. The left coronary artery and the coronary sinus were selectively cannulated. Absolute resting and hyperemic coronary flow were measured using the continuous intracoronary thermodilution of saline through a dedicated infusion catheter (RayFlow®). Arterial and venous samples were collected from the coronary artery and the coronary sinus in five phases: baseline (BL); resting flow measurement (Rest, saline infusion at 10 ml/min); hyperaemia (Hyperaemia, saline infusion at 20 ml/min); post-hyperaemia [Post-Hyperaemia, 2 min after the cessation of saline infusion; and control phase (Control, during infusion of saline through the guide catheter at 30 mL/min). Haemolysis was visually detected only in the centrifugated venous blood samples collected during the Hyperaemia phase. As compared to Rest, during Hyperaemia both LDH [131.50 ± 21.89 U/dL (Rest) and 258.33 ± 57.40 U/dl (Hyperaemia), P Conclusions Saline-induced hyperaemia through a dedicated intracoronary infusion catheter is associated with haemolysis. Vasodilatory compounds released locally, like ATP, are likely ultimately responsible for localized microvascular vasodilation. The role of other substances released by erythrocytes in inducing hyperaemia cannot be excluded and requires further investigations.

Aims Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is an early feature of diabetic cardiomyopathy, which usually precedes the onset of diastolic and systolic dysfunction. Continuous intracoronary thermodilution allows an accurate and reproducible assessment of absolute coronary blood flow and microvascular resistance thus allowing the evaluation of coronary flow reserve (CFR) and Microvascular Resistance Reserve (MRR), a novel index specific for microvascular function, which is independent from the myocardial mass. In the present study we compared absolute coronary flow and resistance, CFR and MRR assessed by continuous intracoronary thermodilution in diabetic vs. non-diabetic patients. Left atrial reservoir strain (LASr), an early marker of diastolic dysfunction was compared between the two groups. Methods In this observational retrospective study, 108 patients with suspected angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) consecutively undergoing elective coronary angiography (CAG) from September 2018 to June 2021 were enrolled. The invasive functional assessment of microvascular function was performed in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) with intracoronary continuous thermodilution. Patients were classified according to the presence of DM. Absolute resting and hyperaemic coronary blood flow (in mL/min) and resistance (in WU) were compared between the two cohorts. FFR was measured to assess coronary epicardial lesions, while CFR and MRR were calculated to assess microvascular function. LAS, assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography, was used to detect early myocardial structural changes potentially associated with microvascular dysfunction. Results The median FFR value was 0.83 (0.79–0.87) without any significant difference between the two groups. Absolute resting and hyperaemic flow in the left anterior descending coronary were similar between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Similarly, resting and hyperaemic resistances did not change significantly between the two groups. In the DM cohort the CFR and MRR were significantly lower compared to the control group [CFR = 2.38 ± 0.61 and 2.88 ± 0.82; MRR = 2.79 ± 0.87 and 3.48 ± 1.02 for diabetic and non-diabetic patients respectively, (P Conclusions Compared with non-diabetic patients, CFR and MRR were lower in patients with DM and non-obstructive epicardial coronary arteries, while both resting and hyperaemic coronary flow and resistance were similar. LASr was lower in diabetic patients, confirming the presence of a subclinical diastolic dysfunction associated to the microcirculatory impairment. Continuous intracoronary thermodilution-derived indexes provide a reliable and operator-independent assessment of coronary macro- and microvasculature and might potentially facilitate widespread clinical adoption of invasive physiologic assessment of suspected microvascular disease.

Background: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is an early feature of diabetic cardiomyopathy, which usually precedes the onset of diastolic and systolic dysfunction. Continuous intracoronary thermodilution allows an accurate and reproducible assessment of absolute coronary blood flow and microvascular resistance thus allowing the evaluation of coronary flow reserve (CFR) and Microvascular Resistance Reserve (MRR), a novel index specific for microvascular function, which is independent from the myocardial mass. In the present study we compared absolute coronary flow and resistance, CFR and MRR assessed by continuous intracoronary thermodilution in diabetic vs. non-diabetic patients. Left atrial reservoir strain (LASr), an early marker of diastolic dysfunction was compared between the two groups.Methods: In this observational retrospective study, 108 patients with suspected angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) consecutively undergoing elective coronary angiography (CAG) from September 2018 to June 2021 were enrolled. The invasive functional assessment of microvascular function was performed in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) with intracoronary continuous thermodilution. Patients were classified according to the presence of DM. Absolute resting and hyperemic coronary blood flow (in mL/min) and resistance (in WU) were compared between the two cohorts. FFR was measured to assess coronary epicardial lesions, while CFR and MRR were calculated to assess microvascular function. LAS, assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography, was used to detect early myocardial structural changes potentially associated with microvascular dysfunction.Results: The median FFR value was 0.83 [0.79–0.87] without any significant difference between the two groups. Absolute resting and hyperemic flow in the left anterior descending coronary were similar between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Similarly, resting and hyperemic resistances did not change significantly between the two groups. In the DM cohort the CFR and MRR were significantly lower compared to the control group (CFR = 2.38 ± 0.61 and 2.88 ± 0.82; MRR = 2.79 ± 0.87 and 3.48 ± 1.02 for diabetic and non-diabetic patients respectively, [p < 0.05 for both]). Likewise, diabetic patients had a significantly lower reservoir, contractile and conductive LAS (all p < 0.05).Conclusions: Compared with non-diabetic patients, CFR and MRR were lower in patients with DM and non-obstructive epicardial coronary arteries, while both resting and hyperemic coronary flow and resistance were similar. LASr was lower in diabetic patients, confirming the presence of a subclinical diastolic dysfunction associated to the microcirculatory impairment. Continuous intracoronary thermodilution-derived indexes provide a reliable and operator-independent assessment of coronary macro- and microvasculature and might potentially facilitate widespread clinical adoption of invasive physiologic assessment of suspected microvascular disease.