Search

Impact of patients VDR polymorphisms on the incidence of overall and moderate-severe chronic GVHD.

Characteristics of the patients.

Linkage disequilibrium of patients VDR polymorphisms.

Purpose:The biologically active metabolite of vitamin D3, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (vit D), has immunoregulatory properties via binding vitamin D receptor (VDR). In a prospective trial, we previously reported a reduction in the incidence of chronic GvHD (cGvHD) among patients who received vit D after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT; Clinical Trials.gov: NCT02600988). Here we analyze the role of patients and donors' VDR SNPs on the immunomodulatory effect of vit D.Patients and Methods:Patients undergoing allo-HSCT were included in a prospective phase I/II clinical trial (Alovita) in three consecutive cohorts: control (without vit D), low-dose (1,000 IU/day), and high-dose (5,000 IU/day) groups. Vit D was given from day −5 until +100 after transplant. Genotyping of four SNPs of the VDR gene, FokI, BsmI, ApaI, and TaqI, were performed using TaqMan SNP genotyping assays.Results:We observed a decrease in the incidence of overall cGvHD at 1 year after allo-HSCT depending on the use or not of vit D among patients with FokI CT genotype (22.5% vs 80%, P = 0.0004) and among those patients without BsmI/ApaI/TaqI ATC haplotype (22.2% vs 68.8%, P = 0.0005). In a multivariate analysis, FokI CT genotype significantly influenced the risk of cGvHD in patients treated with vit D as compared with the control group (HR 0.143, Pinteraction < 0.001).Conclusions:Our results show that the immunomodulatory effect of vit D depends on the VDR SNPs, and patients carrying the FokI CT genotype display the highest benefit from receiving vit D after allo-HSCT.

Supplementary table 5. Impact of donor VDR polymorphisms on the incidence of overall and moderate to severe chronic GVHD.

Syntaxis for Cox model

Background Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), an alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone showed clinical activity and manageable safety in the phase 2 HORIZON study. We aimed to determine whether melflufen plus dexamethasone would provide a progression-free survival benefit compared with pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in patients with previously treated multiple myeloma. Methods In this randomised, open-label, head-to-head, phase 3 study (OCEAN), adult patients (aged ≥18 years) were recruited from 108 university hospitals, specialist hospitals, and community-based centres in 21 countries across Europe, North America, and Asia. Eligible patients had an ECOG performance status of 0–2; must have had relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, refractory to lenalidomide (within 18 months of randomisation) and to the last line of therapy; and have received two to four previous lines of therapy (including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), stratified by age, number of previous lines of therapy, and International Staging System score, to either 28-day cycles of melflufen and dexamethasone (melflufen group) or pomalidomide and dexamethasone (pomalidomide group). All patients received dexamethasone 40 mg orally on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each cycle. In the melflufen group, patients received melflufen 40 mg intravenously over 30 min on day 1 of each cycle and in the pomalidomide group, patients received pomalidomide 4 mg orally daily on days 1 to 21 of each cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by an independent review committee in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03151811, and is ongoing. Findings Between June 12, 2017, and Sept 3, 2020, 246 patients were randomly assigned to the melflufen group (median age 68 years [IQR 60–72]; 107 [43%] were female) and 249 to the pomalidomide group (median age 68 years [IQR 61–72]; 109 [44%] were female). 474 patients received at least one dose of study drug (melflufen group n=228; pomalidomide group n=246; safety population). Data cutoff was Feb 3, 2021. Median progression-free survival was 6·8 months (95% CI 5·0–8·5; 165 [67%] of 246 patients had an event) in the melflufen group and 4·9 months (4·2–5·7; 190 [76%] of 249 patients had an event) in the pomalidomide group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·79, [95% CI 0·64–0·98]; p=0·032), at a median follow-up of 15·5 months (IQR 9·4–22·8) in the melflufen group and 16·3 months (10·1–23·2) in the pomalidomide group. Median overall survival was 19·8 months (95% CI 15·1–25·6) at a median follow-up of 19·8 months (IQR 12·0–25·0) in the melflufen group and 25·0 months (95% CI 18·1–31·9) in the pomalidomide group at a median follow-up of 18·6 months (IQR 11·8–23·7; HR 1·10 [95% CI 0·85–1·44]; p=0·47). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] of 228 in the melflufen group vs 26 [11%] of 246 in the pomalidomide group), neutropenia (123 [54%] vs 102 [41%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]). 27 [12%] patients in the melflufen group and 32 [13%] in the pomalidomide group had fatal treatment-emergent adverse events. Fatal treatment-emergent adverse events were considered possibly treatment related in two patients in the melflufen group (one with acute myeloid leukaemia, one with pancytopenia and acute cardiac failure) and four patients in the pomalidomide group (two patients with pneumonia, one with myelodysplastic syndromes, one with COVID-19 pneumonia). Interpretation Melflufen plus dexamethasone showed superior progression-free survival than pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma., Oncopeptides AB

FLT3–ITD results in a poor prognosis in terms of overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the prognostic usefulness of the allelic ratio (AR) to select post-remission therapy remains controversial. Our study focuses on the prognostic impact of FLT3–ITD and its ratio in a series of 2901 adult patients treated intensively in the pre-FLT3 inhibitor era and reported in the PETHEMA registry. A total of 579 of these patients (20%) harbored FLT3–ITD mutations. In multivariate analyses, patients with an FLT3–ITD allele ratio (AR) of >0.5 showed a lower complete remission (CR rate) and OS (HR 1.47, p = 0.009), while AR > 0.8 was associated with poorer RFS (HR 2.1; p < 0.001). Among NPM1/FLT3–ITD-mutated patients, median OS gradually decreased according to FLT3–ITD status and ratio (34.3 months FLT3–ITD-negative, 25.3 months up to 0.25, 14.5 months up to 0.5, and 10 months ≥ 0.5, p < 0.001). Post-remission allogeneic transplant (allo-HSCT) resulted in better OS and RFS as compared to auto-HSCT in NPM1/FLT3–ITD-mutated AML regardless of pre-established AR cutoff (≤0.5 vs. >0.5). Using the maximally selected log-rank statistics, we established an optimal cutoff of FLT3–ITD AR of 0.44 for OS, and 0.8 for RFS. We analyzed the OS and RFS according to FLT3–ITD status in all patients, and we found that the group of FLT3–ITD-positive patients with AR < 0.44 had similar 5-year OS after allo-HSCT or auto-HSCT (52% and 41%, respectively, p = 0.86), but worse RFS after auto-HSCT (p = 0.01). Among patients with FLT3–ITD AR > 0.44, allo-HSCT was superior to auto-HSCT in terms of OS and RFS. This study provides more evidence for a better characterization of patients with AML harboring FLT3–ITD mutations., This study was fundedby Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) through the project PI19/01518 and PI19/00730 and co- funded by the European Union, the CRIS Against Cancer Foundation, grant 2018/001, and by the Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre (IMAS12). A

A suitable diagnostic classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias requires testing for a large number of molecular biomarkers. Next-generation sequencing is a technology able to integrate identification of the vast majority of them in a single test. This manuscript includes the design, analytical validation and clinical feasibility evaluation of a molecular diagnostic kit for onco-hematological diseases. It is based on sequencing of the coding regions of 76 genes (seeking single-nucleotide variants, small insertions or deletions and CNVs), as well as the search for fusions in 27 target genes. The kit has also been designed to detect large CNVs throughout the genome by including specific probes and employing a custom bioinformatics approach. The analytical and clinical feasibility validation of the Haematology OncoKitDx panel has been carried out from the sequencing of 170 patient samples from 6 hospitals (in addition to the use of commercial reference samples). The analytical validation showed sensitivity and specificity close to 100% for all the parameters evaluated, with a detection limit of 2% for SNVs and SVs, and 20% for CNVs. Clinically relevant mutations were detected in 94% of all patients. An analysis of the correlation between the genetic risk classification of AML (according to ELN 2017) established by the hospitals and that obtained by the Haematology OncoKitDx panel showed an almost perfect correlation (K = 0.94). Among the AML samples with a molecular diagnosis, established by the centers according to the WHO, the Haematology OncoKitDx analysis showed the same result in 97% of them. The panel was able to adequately differentiate between MPN subtypes and also detected alterations that modified the diagnosis (FIP1L1-PDGFRA). Likewise, the cytogenetic risk derived from the CNV plot generated by the NGS panel correlated substantially with the results of the conventional karyotype (K = 0.71) among MDS samples. In addition, the panel detected the main biomarkers of prognostic value among patients with ALL. This validated solution enables a reliable analysis of a large number of molecular biomarkers from a DNA sample in a single assay., This research was funded by Imegen (Instituto de Medicina Genómica, Paterna, Spain).

Next-Generation Sequencing has recently been introduced to efficiently and simultaneously detect genetic variations in acute myeloid leukemia. However, its implementation in the clinical routine raises new challenges focused on the diversity of assays and variant reporting criteria. To overcome this challenge, the PETHEMA group established a nationwide network of reference laboratories aimed to deliver molecular results in the clinics. We report the technical cross-validation results for next-generation sequencing panel genes during the standardization process and the clinical validation in 823 samples of 751 patients with newly diagnosed or refractory/relapse acute myeloid leukemia. Two cross-validation rounds were performed in seven nationwide reference laboratories in order to reach a consensus regarding quality metrics criteria and variant reporting. In the pre-standardization cross-validation round, an overall concordance of 60.98% was obtained with a great variability in selected genes and conditions across laboratories. After consensus of relevant genes and optimization of quality parameters the overall concordance rose to 85.57% in the second cross-validation round. We show that a diagnostic network with harmonized next-generation sequencing analysis and reporting in seven experienced laboratories is feasible in the context of a scientific group. This cooperative nationwide strategy provides advanced molecular diagnostic for acute myeloid leukemia patients of the PETHEMA group.

Acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia‐related changes (AML‐MRC) are poor outcome leukemias. Its diagnosis is based on clinical, cytogenetic, and cytomorphologic criteria, last criterion being sometimes difficult to assess. A high frequency of ASXL1 mutations have been described in this leukemia. We sequenced ASXL1 gene mutations in 61 patients with AML‐MRC and 46 controls with acute myeloid leukemia without other specifications (AML‐NOS) to identify clinical, cytomorphologic, and cytogenetic characteristics associated with ASXL1 mutational status. Mutated ASXL1 (ASXL1+) was observed in 31% of patients with AML‐MRC compared to 4.3% in AML‐NOS. Its presence in AML‐MRC was associated with older age, a previous history of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN), leukocytosis, presence of micromegakaryocytes in bone marrow, lower number of blasts in bone marrow, myelomonocytic/monocytic morphological features and normal karyotype. ASXL1 mutation was not observed in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome‐related cytogenetic abnormalities or TP53 mutations. Differences in terms of overall survival were found only in AML‐MRC patients without prior MDS or MDS/MPN and with intermediate‐risk karyotype, having ASXL1+ patients a worst outcome than ASXL1−. We conclude that the ASXL1 mutation frequency is high in AML‐MRC patients being its presence associated with specific characteristics including morphological signs of dysplasia. This association raises the possible role of ASXL1 as a surrogate marker in AML‐MRC, which could facilitate the diagnosis of patients within this group when the karyotype is normal, and especially when the assessment of multilineage dysplasia morphologically is difficult. This mutation could be used as a worst outcome marker in de novo AML‐MRC with intermediate‐risk karyotype., The ASXL1 mutation frequency is high in AML‐MRC patients being its presence associated with specific characteristics, including morphological signs of dysplasia. This association raises the possible role of ASXL1 as a surrogate marker in AML‐MRC, which could facilitate the diagnosis of patients within this group when the karyotype is normal, and especially when the assessment of multilineage dysplasia morphologically is difficult. This mutation could be used as a worst outcome marker in de novo AML‐MRC with intermediate‐risk karyotype.

Background: The Spanish Myeloma Group (GEM) demonstrated that post-transplant maintenance with thalidomide plus bortezomib was superior to thalidomide alone, although this combination was associated with a high rate of peripheral neuropathy. Lenalidomide is currently the standard postransplant maintenance treatment, and its association with ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor that does not cause peripheral neuropathy, could be of interest. Aim: To assess the potential benefit of postransplant maintenance therapy with Ixazomib /lenalidomide/dexamethasone (IRd) over lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Rd). Patients: Patients who where at least with stable disease after the GEM2012menos65 trial that included VRD-GEM induction, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation conditioned with either melphalan-200 or intravenous busulfan together with melphalan-140 and consolidation with VRD-GEM were randomized to receive maintenance treatment with IRd versus Rd. Each cycle lasted 28 days. Rd arm consisted of lenalidomide 15 mg/d on days 1-21 and 20mg of dexamethasone administered orally on days 1-4 and 9-12. In IRd arm ixazomib 4 mg/day on days 1, 8 and 15 of the cycle was added. At two years, patients with negative MRD discontinued maintenance treatment. Patients with positive MRD continued with Rd for 3 additional years. In this case, 20 mg of dexamethasone was only administered on days 1-4 of the cycle. From November 24, 2014 to May 18, 2017, 161 patients were allocated to Rd arm and 171 to IRd arm. Patient characteristics at screening and prognostic factors such as ISS, cytogenetics and plasmacytomas, as well as response status, were similarly distributed in the two arms. Overall, 22% of the patients had high-risk cytogenetics [t(4;14), t(14;16) and/or 17p deletion]. MRD was analyzed by using next-generation flow at a sensitivity level of 3x10 -6. Results: After a median follow-up of 56 months, there was no difference in PFS between the two maintenance arms (median not reached, PFS at 5 years: 62% vs. 63% with IRd and Rd, respectively, p=0.785) (figure 1). In the overall series, there were no significant differences in PFS or OS among patients with standard (SR) or high-risk (HR) cytogenetics. Median PFS had not been reached in patients with SR in both arms (PFS at 5 years: 66% with IRD vs. 62% with Rd, p=0.633). In patients with HR the median PFS was 62 months with IRd vs. not reached with Rd (p=0.636). No significant differences across subgroups (ISS, conditioning, cytogenetics or MRD) were observed between IRd and Rd. Negative MRD at screening overcomes the bad prognosis of cytogenetics (PFS at 5 years 78% for SR and 80% for HR; OS at 5 years was 90% for both, SR and HR). Patients with SR who had negative MRD at screening had a significantly longer PFS (PFS at 5 years 78% vs. 50%, p Conclusions: Maintenance therapy with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients homogeneously treated with VRD-GEM induction, ASCT and VRD-GEM consolidation resulted in a long PFS of 63% at 5 years from the start of maintenance. The addition of ixazomib did not result in a PFS benefit. This could be partially explained by the higher toxicity leading to dose reductions or discontinuation of ixazomib in the IRd arm. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Rosinol: Janssen, Celgene, Amgen and Takeda: Honoraria. Oriol: Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jarque: AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Beigene: Consultancy; CellTrion: Consultancy; Eusa: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Grifols: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Speakers Bureau; Shionogi: Consultancy; Sobi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Moraleda: Pfizer: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Sanofi: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; MSD: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; ROCHE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Sandoz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding; Amgen: Other: Educational Grants, Research Funding. Sureda: Mundipharma: Consultancy; Bluebird: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Martínez-López: Roche, Novartis, Incyte, Astellas, BMS: Research Funding; Janssen, BMS, Novartis, Incyte, Roche, GSK, Pfizer: Consultancy. De Arriba: BMS-Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Glaxo Smith Kline: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Mateos: Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene - Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bluebird bio: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sea-Gen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. San-Miguel: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Karyopharm, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, SecuraBio, and Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lahuerta: Celgene: Other: Travel accomodations and expenses; Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, Janssen and Sanofi: Consultancy. Bladé Creixenti: Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Amgen and Oncopeptides: Honoraria.

Introduction: Carfilzomib dosed at 56 mg/m2 twice a week in combination with dexamethasone (Kd) is a standard of care for RRMM after 1-3 prior lines (PL) based on the ENDEAVOR study. Later, the ARROW study showed Kd dosed at 70 mg/m2 weekly to be superior to Kd dosed at 27 mg/m2 twice a week on RRMM patients (pts) after 2-3 PL. On the other side, Cyclophosphamide is an alkylating agent that has been widely combined with proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs in MM, improving their efficacy with a good safety profile. In this phase 2 randomized study, we have compared Kd plus cyclophosphamide (KCyd) with Kd in RRMM after 1-3PL, both with K dosed weekly at 70 mg/m2. Patients and methods: RRMM after 1-3 PL of therapy were included in the trial. Consistently with the ENDEAVOR population, previous therapy with proteasome inhibitors was allowed but refractory patients were excluded. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive K at a dose of 70 mg/m2 iv on days 1, 8 and 15 plus dexamethasone at a dose of 20 mg PO the day on and the day after K plus/minus KCyd at a dose of 300 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28 days-cycle, as continuous treatment until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was PFS and key secondary endpoints included response rates, safety profile, and OS. Results: Between January 2018 and February 2020, 198 RRMM pts were included. 97 pts were randomized to KCyd and 101 to Kd. The baseline characteristics of the patients were well balanced between both groups. The median age was 70 years, and 70% and 28% of pts were older than 65 and 75. The median number of PL was one; 61% of pts had received 1 prior line. 94% and 92% of patients had been exposed to bortezomib in the KCyd and Kd and all of them were sensitive. 72% and 67% of patients had been exposed to IMiD's and 51% and 55% of them were IMiD's-refractory in the KCyd and Kd. Only 4 and 6 patients in KCyd and Kd, had received anti-CD38 antibodies being all refractory. After a median f/u of 15.6 months, median PFS was 20.7 m and 15.2 m in KCyd and Kd (p=0.2). In pts after 1PL, median PFS has not been reached in any arm (p=0.4) and in patients after 2-3PL, KCyd resulted in a median PFS of 20.7 vs 11m for Kd (p=0.4). Of note, in the IMiD-refractory population, the addition of Cy to Kd resulted in a significant benefit in terms of PFS: 26.2 months vs 7.7 months in the Kd arm (p=0.01). OS is immature with 23 and 25 events so far in KCyd and Kd, respectively. The ORR was 78% for KCyd and 73% for Kd: 20% of patients in both arms achieved at least complete response, 33% and 28% very good partial response, respectively, and 25% partial response in both arms. The MRD-ve rate was 4% and 5%. As far as toxicity is concerned, neutropenia was the only hematological adverse event more frequently reported in KCyd compared with Kd, of any grade (24% vs 11%) and grade 3-4 (13% vs 7%). This did not translate into more infections and the rate was comparable in both arms (5% G3-4 in both arms). Thrombocytopenia of any grade and grade 3-4 occurred in 14%/1% and 18%/10% in KCyd/Kd. Cardiovascular events of any grade occurred in 22% and 30% of patients in KCyd and Kd. Nine pts in KCyd developed G3-4 cardiovascular events, these included atrial fibrillation (1pt), cardiac failure (2 pts), myocardial infarct (2 pts), and hypertension (4 pts). In the Kd arm, 11 patients developed G3-4 cardiovascular events and consisted of hypertension in most of them (9 pts). Conclusion: Cyclophosphamide added to Kd 70 mg/m2 weekly in RRMM pts after 1-3 PL prolonged the PFS as compared to Kd particularly in the lenalidomide-refractory population. The administration of K at a dose of 70 mg/m2 weekly was safe and more convenient and overall, the toxicity profile was manageable in both arms. Disclosures Mateos: Abbvie/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; PharmaMar-Zeltia: Consultancy; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ocio:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Asofarma: Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy; MDS: Honoraria; Secura-Bio: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy. Sureda Balari:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck Sharpe and Dohme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria. Oriol:Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosinol Dachs:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Blade Creixenti:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. San-Miguel:Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Takeda, Sanofi, Roche, Abbvie, GlaxoSmithKline and Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Purpose: The biologically active metabolite of vitamin D3, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (vit D), has immunoregulatory properties via binding vitamin D receptor (VDR). In a prospective trial, we previously reported a reduction in the incidence of chronic GvHD (cGvHD) among patients who received vit D after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT; Clinical Trials.gov: NCT02600988). Here we analyze the role of patients and donors' VDR SNPs on the immunomodulatory effect of vit D. Patients and Methods: Patients undergoing allo-HSCT were included in a prospective phase I/II clinical trial (Alovita) in three consecutive cohorts: control (without vit D), low-dose (1,000 IU/day), and high-dose (5,000 IU/day) groups. Vit D was given from day −5 until +100 after transplant. Genotyping of four SNPs of the VDR gene, FokI, BsmI, ApaI, and TaqI, were performed using TaqMan SNP genotyping assays. Results: We observed a decrease in the incidence of overall cGvHD at 1 year after allo-HSCT depending on the use or not of vit D among patients with FokI CT genotype (22.5% vs 80%, P = 0.0004) and among those patients without BsmI/ApaI/TaqI ATC haplotype (22.2% vs 68.8%, P = 0.0005). In a multivariate analysis, FokI CT genotype significantly influenced the risk of cGvHD in patients treated with vit D as compared with the control group (HR 0.143, Pinteraction < 0.001). Conclusions: Our results show that the immunomodulatory effect of vit D depends on the VDR SNPs, and patients carrying the FokI CT genotype display the highest benefit from receiving vit D after allo-HSCT.

Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is highly FDG-avid even though its usefulness in the management of these patients is still controversial. Aim We analyzed the role of positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) in staging newly diagnosed patients with BL and evaluating disease after first-line chemotherapy. Methods Fifty-two PET/CTs were performed in 32 patients (20 at diagnosis, 27 after treatment, five to monitor residual disease). Involved areas were retrospectively compared with those observed in contrast-enhanced CT. Results Discrepancies were found in 64.7% of patients for whom results of both tests at diagnosis were available (n = 17), most of them involving extranodal sites. Regarding response assessment, discrepancies were observed in 38% of patients with both tests (5/13): residual masses detected by CT with negative PET/CT. Of 27 patients with post-treatment PET/CT, 22 were in complete remission whereas one true-positive and four false-positive lesions (two nodal and two extranodal) were detected. With a median follow-up of 27 months, 22 patients with negative PET/CT did not relapse. Thus, negative predictive value (NPV) was 100%. With respect to positive predictive value (PPV), one of five patients with positive assays after treatment died due to progression while the remaining four had false-positive lesions. Nevertheless, for these four patients, mean SUVmax at nodal sites was 4.1 vs. 14.9 at diagnosis, while mean SUVmax at extranodal sites was 3.8 vs. 12.1. Thus, with a cutoff value for SUVmax

The use of PET in patients with marginal zone B cell lymphoma (MZL) is controversial because of variability of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) avidity. We analyzed 40 PET/CT in 25 consecutive patients to compare its performance with CT at staging and as a first-line response assessment. Sensitivity of PET/CT and CT was 96 and 76%. Mean standard uptake value was 6.1, 6.9 and 3.4 (p = 0.3) in nodal, extranodal and splenic subtypes, respectively. Of 17 patients (extranodal: n = 9; nodal: n = 6; splenic subtype: n = 2) with both imaging tests available at diagnosis, 8 (47%) had more involved areas with PET/CT than with CT, 75% of which were extranodal lesions. PET/CT resulted in upstaging of five patients although treatment of only two of them was changed. Responses of 15 patients with post-treatment PET/CT were the following: 9 negative and 6 positive of which 3 were isolated residual lesions. Progression was documented in two of these three patients. Response was also assessed by CT in 11 patients. Discrepancies were found in three: Two were in complete remission by CT while PET/CT detected localized residual disease; another patient was in partial remission by CT, whereas PET/CT showed only one positive lesion. Two of these three patients relapsed. Patients with negative post-treatment PET/CT did not relapse. With a median follow-up of 50 months (10–152 months), 3-year overall survival was 100 and 80% for patients with negative and positive post-treatment PET/CT (p = 0.2). Three-year disease-free survival was 86%; the negative predictive value (NPV) was 100%, and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 83.3%. Although a larger number of patients will be required to further confirm these data, we can conclude that PET/CT is a useful imaging tool for both staging and response assessment in patients with nodal and extranodal MZL as a result of its high sensitivity, NPV and PPV. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fludarabine-based regimens are highly effective as first-line therapy in patients with follicular lymphoma. Nevertheless, noticeable haematological toxicity has been reported using fludarabine-based regimens. Aim To analyse the combination of low-dose oral fludarabine and cyclophosphamide plus rituximab (FCR) as induction therapy, followed by rituximab as maintenance therapy. Methods We retrospectively analysed 73 patients diagnosed with low-grade follicular lymphoma treated with two different schemes: attenuated oral (AO) and standard intravenous (SIV) FCR. Results Overall response rate (ORR) was 95% (complete response rate, CRR 79.5%, partial response, PR 15.4%). CRR was 84.6% in AO vs. 61.9% in SIV (P = 0.058). 44.4% of patients underwent maintenance therapy. Grade 3–4 toxicities included neutropenia: 65.4%; anaemia: 39.7%; thrombocytopenia: five patients; infectious complications: six patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. 6.8% had a secondary malignancy. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 84.6% at 12 yr. The following variables influenced PFS in multivariate analysis: Hb

INTRODUCTION Cell free tumor DNA (cftDNA) based targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) is a novel tool that enables accurate and minimally invasive tumor genotyping. MATERIAL AND METHODS Here we have performed cftDNA targeted NGS for the molecular diagnosis of a series of 92 peripheral blood samples obtained at diagnosis in patients included in a phase II randomized clinical trial comparing standard RCHOP versus BRCAP as first line treatment in patients with poor IPI (aaIPI2-3 or aaIPI1 with high b2m, age 18-71, NCT01848132). Centralized histopathological review of diagnostic tissue samples confirmed the diagnosis: 83 DLBCL (68%, 55/81 GCB, 32%, 26/81 non-GCB, according to Hans immunohistochemical algorithm), 4 TCHRBCL, 3 PMBCL, 1 concurrent DLBCL and FL3A, 1 FL 3B. 7 out of 83 cases had DLBCL morphology and DH by FISH (6 MYC/BCL2 and 1 MYC/BCL6, all GCB-type by IHC). A targeted NGS approach using amplicon-based chemistry (Truseq, Illumina) that interrogates exonic regions of 35 relevant genes in DLBCL (1458 amplicons analyzed) was used for library generation from plasma derived DNA. Germline DNA from peripheral blood granulocytes from 89 out of 92 patients was sequenced in parallel and used as control DNA for variant calling. Only somatic variants with a read depth above 100 and Variant Allele Frequency > 5% were considered. RESULTS cftDNA concentration (hGE/mL) was associated with LDH levels (U/mL) at diagnosis. Mean cftDNA concentration was lower in patients with low LDH (U Mann whitney p= 0.005). Somatic mutations were identified in 74% (68 out of 92) patient plasma samples. 242 somatic mutations were considered after filtering. Mean of 3.6 mutations per patient. 10 genes were mutated in >10% of the patients, including: FAT2 (19.6%), ARID1A (18%), NOTCH1 (17.4%), NOTCH2 (15.2%), KMT2D (14.13%), SMARCA4 (14%), ATM (13%), EP300 (13%), EZH2 (13%), PLCG2 (13%). Recurrent mutations were found in EZH2 (2 patients). Mutations in BCR/TLR pathway genes were found in less than 10% of the cases (CARD11, 7.6%; MYD88, 4.4%; CD79A, 5.4%; CD79B, 1%; BTK, 4.4%). NOTCH1 mutations were found preferentially in GCB type DLBCL (12/55 GCB vs 1/26 nonGCB, Chi square p value DISCUSSION cftDNA targeted NGS captures the mutational profile in a significant fraction of DLBCL patients and enables tumor genotyping in the clinical trial setting. In contrast with previously published data mutations in NOTCH pathway, including NOTCH1, NOTCH2 and SGK1 were relatively frequent in our series of poor IPI patients, outnumbering the frequency of mutations in BCR/TLR pathway. NOTCH pathway mutations were also preferentially found in GCB-type DLBCL-NOS, PMBCL and 1 case of TCHRBCL. In summary cftDNA genotyping based on targeted NGS can provide potentially useful information for therapy selection in DLBCL patients. Disclosures Martín: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Servier: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses. Gonzalez-Barca:Roche: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy; Celtrion: Consultancy. Montes-Moreno:TAKEDA: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy.

Vitamin D is a steroid-like hormone which acts by binding to vitamin D receptor (VDR). It plays a main role in the calcium homeostasis and metabolism. In addition, vitamin D display other important effects called “non-classical actions.” Among them, vitamin D regulates immune cells function and hematopoietic cells differentiation and proliferation. Based on these effects, it is currently being evaluated for the treatment of hematologic malignancies. In addition, vitamin D levels have been correlated with patients’ outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, where it might regulate immune response and, accordingly, might influence the risk of graft-versus-host disease. Here, we present recent advances regarding its clinical applications both in the treatment of hematologic malignancies and in the transplant setting.

Images in Haematology

The use of PET in patients with marginal zone B cell lymphoma (MZL) is controversial because of variability of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) avidity. We analyzed 40 PET/CT in 25 consecutive patients to compare its performance with CT at staging and as a first-line response assessment. Sensitivity of PET/CT and CT was 96 and 76%. Mean standard uptake value was 6.1, 6.9 and 3.4 (p = 0.3) in nodal, extranodal and splenic subtypes, respectively. Of 17 patients (extranodal: n = 9; nodal: n = 6; splenic subtype: n = 2) with both imaging tests available at diagnosis, 8 (47%) had more involved areas with PET/CT than with CT, 75% of which were extranodal lesions. PET/CT resulted in upstaging of five patients although treatment of only two of them was changed. Responses of 15 patients with post-treatment PET/CT were the following: 9 negative and 6 positive of which 3 were isolated residual lesions. Progression was documented in two of these three patients. Response was also assessed by CT in 11 patients. Discrepancies were found in three: Two were in complete remission by CT while PET/CT detected localized residual disease; another patient was in partial remission by CT, whereas PET/CT showed only one positive lesion. Two of these three patients relapsed. Patients with negative post-treatment PET/CT did not relapse. With a median follow-up of 50 months (10-152 months), 3-year overall survival was 100 and 80% for patients with negative and positive post-treatment PET/CT (p = 0.2). Three-year disease-free survival was 86%; the negative predictive value (NPV) was 100%, and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 83.3%. Although a larger number of patients will be required to further confirm these data, we can conclude that PET/CT is a useful imaging tool for both staging and response assessment in patients with nodal and extranodal MZL as a result of its high sensitivity, NPV and PPV.

Background: Survival of DLBCL patients with high IPI treated with RCHOP immunochemotherapy is poor. In this population, the combination of RCHOP with new drugs is an attractive approach, along with performing an evaluation with PET/CT after 2 to 4 cycles to change the therapy if an early complete response is not achieved. Methods : We performed a clinical trial comparing 6 cycles of RCHOP vs 6 cycles of BRCAP, a modified RCHOP regimen changing vincristine by bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 sc days 1, 8, and 15 of a 21-day cycle. Pre-phase therapy was permitted for patients who could not wait the results of the screening procedures to start therapy due to the aggressiveness of the disease. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01848132). Patients younger than 71 yrs diagnosed with DLBCL and an age-adjusted IPI (aaIPI) 2-3 or aaIPI 1 with increased beta2microglobulin were eligible. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who survives free of event at 2 years. Centralized anatomopathology review was performed in all cases; samples were classified as germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) vs non-GCB subtypes by immunohistochemistry according to the Hans algorithm. PET/CTs were performed baseline, after 2, 4 and 6 cycles (PET2, PET4, and PET6), and were reviewed at real time by at least 3 experts of a central panel. Response at the end of therapy was analyzed following the visual method with the Deauville scale, and response after PET2 and PET4 was evaluated using the semiquantitative method. Persistent disease at PET4 was considered as failure of therapy and these patients were removed from trial treatment. EFS was calculated from diagnosis until event defined as death from any cause, relapse, progression or need of salvage therapy (defined as PET4 or PET6 positive). Overall survival (OS) was calculated from diagnosis until death for any cause. We present here a preliminary analysis of results. Results: One hundred and twenty-one patients were included; data on 113 are presented (diagnosis not confirmed in 6, data missing in 2). Median age was 57.1 yrs (range 23-70), 57 (50.4%) were males. Characteristics at diagnosis were: non-GCB subtype 32/87 (36.8%), immunohistochemical co-expression of myc/bcl2 56/82 (77.8%), stage III-IV 107 (94.7%), ≥2 extranodal locations 55/76 (72.5%), ECOG 2-3 36 (32.1%), increased LDH 88 (77.9%), increased beta 2 microglobulin 73 (64.6%), aaIPI 3: 32 (28.3%). No differences were found between treatment arms. Fifty-five patients were treated in the experimental arm (EA) and 58 in the control arm (CA). Twenty-eight (28.3%) out of 99 patients required of pre-phase treatment. The mean relative dose intensity for bortezomib was 88.3%. Data about the most frequent toxicity are shown in table 1. Twenty-nine (30.2%) out of 96 patients who have finished 4 cycles had a positive PET4 according to central review and were withdrawn to receive salvage therapy. Complete remission (CR) at the end of therapy (PET4-/PET6-) was observed in 44 (45.8%) patients. After a median follow-up of 9 months, estimated 12-mo EFS was 36.6%, and 12-mo OS was 82.9% in the whole series. Data of the subgroup analysis according the immunohistochemistry subtypes by Hans algorithm are show in table 2. Conclusions: In the present preliminary analysis, no significant differences were found between RCHOP and BRCAP in terms of CR and EFS in this very high-risk population of young DLBCL patients. However, in the subgroup analysis of patients with non-GCB disease, we found a significantly better CR rate in patients treated with BRCAP. A longer follow-up is needed to evaluate the real impact of this therapy on survival. Disclosures González-Barca: Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria. Martín:Sevier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sancho:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion, Inc: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. López-Jiménez:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Velgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MundiPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. López-Guillermo:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MundiPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ramírez:Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Conde:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

BACKGROUND : Approximately 20 to 55% of patients diagnosed with lymphoma will relapse or show refractoriness after first line treatment. Salvage chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the most commonly used approach in patients with chemosensitive disease. Nevertheless, active disease at the time of ASCT evaluated by PET/CT is correlated with a poor overall survival (OS). Despite this, it is not definitively established whether or not; tumor burden assessed by PET/CT at time of ASCT affects the outcome of these patients. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the predictive value of PET/CT performed before ASCT in terms of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients diagnosed with relapsed/refractory lymphoma with active disease at time of transplant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of all consecutive patients diagnosed with relapsed or refractory lymphoma after at least one line of chemotherapy and who had active disease assessed by PET/CT at the time of ASCT between July/2001 and August/2012 in our institution. Partial response (PR) ≥ 90%, was defined as a decrease in tumor load higher that 90% as assessed by PET/CT without fulfilling criteria of complete response. Partial response was defined as a decrease in tumor load higher than 50% and lower than 90%. Progressive disease was defined as appearing new focus of disease or worsening previous involved areas. OS was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier test and “log rank test” was used to compare different groups (PR ≥ 90% vs PR or less). PFS was analyzed with “Cox Regression” test. RESULTS: Demographics and clinical data are summarized in table 1. Seven years PFS of patients with partial response ≥ 90% at ASCT was 71.4% versus 28.6% for patients in PR or less at transplant (p=0.09). Among patients who develop it median time to relapse or progression after ASCT was 4 months (1-40). ASCT related mortality was 3.4%. Rescue therapy after transplant consisted on chemotherapy in 71.4% of cases, radiotherapy in 19% and supportive care in 9.5%. Eight patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation after ASCT (27.6%). After 18 months median follow-up (3-69), OS for the whole series was 48.3% at seven years. Patients who achieved PR ≥ 90% had a seven year OS of 72.7% versus 33.3% among patients with PR or less[HR 3.1 (CI 95% 0.9-11.4), p=0.05]. CONCLUSIONS 1) Patients with pre-ASCT PET/TC evaluation defined as ≥ 90% PR have a long term disease free and overall survival. 2) Conversely, patients receiving ASCT in a partial response lower than 90% have a poor long term disease free and overall survival, suggesting that this set of patients should be candidates to alternative therapeutic options such as first-line Allo-SCT or investigational drugs. TABLE 1. Patients characteristics N=29 Age, median (range) 34 (27-51) Sex M/F :58.6% / 41.4% DiagnosticHLNHLDLBC-LMantle cell lymphomaPeripheral T cell lymphomaLymphoblastic lymphomaTransformed follicular lymphoma 48.3% 51.7% 60% 13.3% 13.3% 6.7% 6.7% Ann Arbor stageIIIIIIIV 3.4% 37.9% 24.1% 34.5% Prognosis index (IPI,EORTC/IH)Low riskIntermediate riskHigh risk 10.7% 42.9% 46.4% Bulky mass 35.7% Extranodal disease 42.9% B symptoms 50 % Bone marrow involvement 7.1% Number of previous line therapy 3 (2-5) Previous response to treatmentPR≥90%PR or less 37.9% (n=11) 62.1% (n=19) Status disease at ASCTPrimary refractory diseaseRelapse after previous response 55.2% 44.8% Conditioning regimenBEAMBCNU + TTBCNU + TT + CY 93.1% 3.4% 3.4% HL: Hodgkin lymphoma; NHL: non-hodgkin lyphoma; DLBC Lymphoma: diffuse large B cell lymphoma; IPI: International Prognostic Index; IH: Hansenclever index; BEAM: Busulfan, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan; TT: Thiotepa; CY: cyclophosphamide. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Background Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma at time of diagnosis, most patients have advanced disease, Although effective therapies are available, this disease remains incurable with standard therapy. Recently two clinical trials comparing different regimens of immunochemotherapy have been published. Federico et al, compared R-CVP, R-CHOP and R-FCM. Response rates and PFS were similar among patients receiving R-CHOP and R-FM, with more toxicity and secondary malignancies in R-FM group. The aim of this study is to analyze the efficacy in terms of responses, OS and PFS, and safety of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR) as induction therapy. Matherial and methods We retrospectively analyzed 78 patients diagnosed with grade 1, 2 or 3a follicular lymphoma between 2001 and May/2011. Results Patients´s characteristics are in table 1. The median of cycles was 4 (3-6 cycles). Overall response rate (ORR) was 95% (CR 79,5%, PR 15,4%). 57,7% received rituximab as consolidation in four weekly doses after induction immunochemotherapy and 46,8% of patients underwent maintenance therapy with rituximab at 375mg/m2, every 3 months during 2 years. After maintenance, two out of three patients in PR after induction achieved CR while three patients in CR relapsed. ORR after maintenance therapy was 94,3%, (CR:91,4%; PR: 2,9%). Overall toxicity was 79,5% (n=62). Neutropenia grades 3-4: 65,4%; grades 3-4 anemia: 39,7%; grades 3-4 thrombopenia in five patients. Grades 3-4 infectious episodes in 6 patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. At last follow-up six patients had a secondary malignancy (7,7%): one squamous cells skin, one endometrial cancer, three myelodysplastic syndrome and one cholangiocarcinoma. With a median follow up of 4 years (8 months-11 years), PFS was 84,6% at 10 years, median time to relapsed of 22 months (5-88). Four patients suffered histological transformation. In multivariate analysis, Hb < 12 gr/dl at diagnosis (HR = 4,7 (CI 95% 1,18-18,6, p=0,028)), response after induction (HR =4,9 (CI 95% 1,01-24, p=0,048), for patients with PR compared to CR; and HR = 21,27 (CI 95% 4,33-104, p 2,5 mg/dL , HR = 5,2 (CI 95% 1,16-23,7, p=0,031). Conclusions Complete remission rate (CRR) favourably compares in the current study to that previously described with R-CHOP (80% vs 73%) with a higher incidence of neutropenia and infectious complications, although with no treatment related mortality. Hb > 12 mg/dl and to obtain a CR after induction immunochemotherapy are related to a better PFS. Maintenance therapy with rituximab favourably influences on survival (Figure 1). This finding is remarkable since, so far, maintenance with R has been reported to improve PFS but not OS. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Introduction Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL) is an indolent lymphoma in which the use of PET/CT is poorly explored and also controversial due to the heterogeneous 18F- FDG avidity described in these types of lymphoma. Our aim in the present study is to evaluate the role of 18F-FDG-PET/ CT (PET/CT) in comparison to CT with intravenous contrast enhancement at initial staging and response assessment to chemotherapy in these patients. Methods and Materials A retrospective single-center study that included 34 patients, diagnosed of MZL between 1998 and 2012, with at least one PET/CT available. A total of 55 PET/ CT were performed: 25 at initial diagnosis, 19 for first- line response assessment, 6 in relapse and 5 after relapse- treatment. Locations of involved areas were registered comparing staging CT and PET/CT and were classified as discrepancy or not. Results Patients´ baseline characteristics are shown in table 1. At diagnosis, all patients presented with at least one abnormal focal FDG uptake except for one, which reflected a sensitivity of 96%. Median SUVmax was higher in nodal marginal zone lymphoma (NMZL) and extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (ENMZL): 6,1 (4- 8,4) and 6,9 (2- 13,8) respectively, in comparison to splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) 3,4 (3,2- 3,6) p=0,3. SUVmax was much higher in a patient with histological transformation to a DLBCL (SUVmax 37). Among 17 patients with both radiological imaging at the time of diagnosis, there were 8 patients (47%) with more involved areas demonstrated by PET/ CT than by CT alone, 75% of them were extranodal lesions. PET/CT upstaged 5 patients but in only 2 of them entailed a change in therapeutic management. Four patients did not show FDG avidity by PET/CT in some areas suspected to be involved by CT, what generated a CT sensitivity of 76%. Table 1 . Patients´ baseline characteristics (N=33). CR: complete remission; PR: partial remission; NA: not assessed; PD: progressive disease. Patient: n/n available (%) Age (mean-range) 61 +/-13'5 Sex Man Woman . N=17(51%) N=16(48%) WHO diagnosis ENMZL NMZL SMZL . N=22(66.7%) N=6(18.2%) N=5(15.2%) Imaging techniques at diagnosis CT alone PET/CT alone Both Unknown . N=6(18.1%) N=7(21.2%) N=18(54.5%) N=2(6.2%) Stage at diagnosis I II III IV . N=6/33(18.1%) N=5/33(15.1%) N=6/33(18.1%) N=16/33(48.4%) Bone Marrow involvement N=9/33(27%) Bulky masses N=3/33(9%) Extranodal disease N=26/33(78.7%) LDH (median, range) N=28; 292U/ml (186'5-397'75) Hemoglobine (median, range) N=29; 118gr/dl (100-134) B2 microglobulin (median, range) N=24; 3'14mg/dl (2'3-5'1) IPI 0 1 2 3 4 . N=3/25(12%) N=8/25(32%) N=8/25(32%) N=4/25(16%) N=2/25(8%) First line treatment FCR R-CHOP Rituximab monotherapy Radiotherapy Surgery Spleenectomy . N=13/33(39.3%) N=5/33(15.1%) N=5/33(15.1%) N=2/33(6%) N=5/33(15.1%) N=3/3 (9%) Response CR PR NA PD . N=21(63%) N=4(12.1%) N=3(9%) N=5(15.1%) Overall, CR was attained in 24 patients (66%) with 5-y OS 78%. Among 19 patients with a PET/CT available for first-line response assessment, responses were: 12 CR, 2 PR, 1PD and isolated residual lesions in 4 patients. Progression was documented in 2 of the 4 patients with residual lesions which were considered positive, and in 2 patients who maintained remission, the image was interpreted as a false positive (FP). The response assessment was performed by both radiological imaging in 13 patients. Discrepancies were found in 4 cases: CT showed CR in 3 patients while PET/CT detected localized residual disease and in another patient, CT showed stable disease whereas PET/CT demonstrated CR. Overall, none of the patients in CR by PET/CT relapsed. Five-year OS was 100% in contrast to 64% for those patients with a positive PET/CT after completing treatment (p=0,2), with a mean follow-up of 50 months (10-152). The NPV was 100% and PPV was 71% (5/7). Relapse was detected in 9 patients (37.5%). Six patients had PET/CT for re-staging and 5 for response assessment. All re-staging PET/CT had FDG-avidity with a median SUVmax of 9.9 (4.6-17.2). PET/CT for response after salvage treatment demonstrated 3 CR and 2 localized residual lesions. The NPV and PPV was 100% and 50%, respectively. Conclusions MZL shows higher 18F- FDG avidity in NMZL y ENMZL subtypes. PET/CT is more sensitive than CT at initial staging, chiefly in identifying extranodal involvement. Response assessment PET/CT had a NPV of 100% and PPV of 71 and 50% after first and second-line treatment, respectively. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.