Search

Despite the unmet need, clinical trial opportunities for primary and metastatic central nervous system cancers are limited and clinical trial enrollment is poor. Multiple stakeholders have launched efforts to improve the clinical trial landscape for patients with primary and metastatic central nervous system tumors, including work that promotes the inclusion of patients with brain tumors into clinical trials, re-examination of eligibility criteria, and careful consideration of trial design aspects that may uniquely impact the patients with this disease. Herein, we consider regulatory perspectives from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and clinician-trialist perspectives from a neuro-oncologist and a medical oncologist.

Brain metastases occur commonly in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Yet, less is known about brain metastases than cancer-related entities of similar incidence. Advances in oncologic care have heightened the importance of intracranial management. Here, in this consensus review supported by the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), we review the landscape of brain metastases with particular attention to management approaches and ongoing efforts with potential to shape future paradigms of care. Each coauthor carried an area of expertise within the field of brain metastases and initially composed, edited, or reviewed their specific subsection of interest. After each subsection was accordingly written, multiple drafts of the manuscript were circulated to the entire list of authors for group discussion and feedback. The hope is that the these consensus guidelines will accelerate progress in the understanding and management of patients with brain metastases, and highlight key areas in need of further exploration that will lead to dedicated trials and other research investigations designed to advance the field.

PURPOSE The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria are widely used in high-grade glioma clinical trials. We compared the RANO criteria with updated modifications (modified RANO [mRANO] and immunotherapy RANO [iRANO] criteria) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (nGBM) and recurrent GBM (rGBM) to evaluate the performance of each set of criteria and inform the development of the planned RANO 2.0 update. MATERIALS AND METHODS Evaluation of tumor measurements and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences were performed by blinded readers to determine disease progression using RANO, mRANO, iRANO, and other response assessment criteria. Spearman's correlations between progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. RESULTS Five hundred twenty-six nGBM and 580 rGBM cases were included. Spearman's correlations were similar between RANO and mRANO (0.69 [95% CI, 0.62 to 0.75] v 0.67 [95% CI, 0.60 to 0.73]) in nGBM and rGBM (0.48 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.55] v 0.50 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.57]). In nGBM, requirement of a confirmation scan within 12 weeks of completion of radiotherapy to determine progression was associated with improved correlations. Use of the postradiation magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as baseline scan was associated with improved correlation compared with use of the pre-radiation MRI (0.67 [95% CI, 0.60 to 0.73] v 0.53 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.62]). Evaluation of FLAIR sequences did not improve the correlation. Among patients who received immunotherapy, Spearman's correlations were similar among RANO, mRANO, and iRANO. CONCLUSION RANO and mRANO demonstrated similar correlations between PFS and OS. Confirmation scans were only beneficial in nGBM within 12 weeks of completion of radiotherapy, and there was a trend in favor of the use of postradiation MRI as the baseline scan in nGBM. Evaluation of FLAIR can be omitted. The iRANO criteria did not add significant benefit in patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Supplemental Figure: Mean plasma concentrations of vandetanib.

Supplemental Tables 1-3. Supplementary Table 1: Correlations in the vandetanib/RT/TMZ arm between best radiographic responses with pre-treatment and on-treatment changes in blood biomarkers. Supplementary Table 2: Correlations in the vandetanib/RT/TMZ arm between overall survival with pre-treatment and on-treatment changes in blood biomarkers. Supplementary Table 3: Comparison of PFS or OS by log-rank p-value based on tissue biomarker analysis

PDF file, 80K, Supplementary Table 1: Temozolomide 150 mg/m2 Pharmacokinetic Parameters (first cycle).

PDF file, 62K, Supplementary Table 2: Grade 3 or 4 events with relationship unrelated to unlikely to combination therapy (Vorinostat + TMZ).

Purpose: A phase I, dose-finding study of vorinostat in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and pharmacokinetics in patients with high-grade glioma (HGG).Experimental Design: This phase I, dose-finding, investigational study was conducted in two parts. Part 1 was a dose-escalation study of vorinostat in combination with TMZ 150 mg/m2/day for 5 days every 28 days. Part 2 was a dose-escalation study of vorinostat in combination with TMZ 150 mg/m2/day for 5 days of the first cycle and 200 mg/m2/day for 5 days of the subsequent 28-day cycles.Results: In part 1, the MTD of vorinostat administered on days 1 to 7 and 15 to 21 of every 28-day cycle, in combination with TMZ, was 500 mg daily. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) included grade 3 anorexia, grade 3 ALT, and grade 5 hemorrhage in the setting of grade 4 thrombocytopenia. In part 2, the MTD of vorinostat on days 1 to 7 and 15 to 21 of every 28-day cycle, combined with TMZ, was 400 mg daily. No DLTs were encountered, but vorinostat dosing could not be escalated further due to thrombocytopenia. The most common serious adverse events were fatigue, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and thromboembolic events. There were no apparent pharmacokinetic interactions between vorinostat and TMZ. Vorinostat treatment resulted in hyperacetylation of histones H3 and H4 in peripheral mononuclear cells.Conclusion: Vorinostat in combination with temozolomide is well tolerated in patients with HGG. A phase I/II trial of vorinostat with radiotherapy and concomitant TMZ in newly diagnosed glioblastoma is underway. Clin Cancer Res; 18(21); 6032–9. ©2012 AACR.

Neuro-oncology is a growing, interdisciplinary field at the intersection of neurology and oncology, devoted to the care of patients with central nervous system tumors and neurologic complications of cancer, and collaboratively interfacing with neurosurgery, neuropathology, medical oncology and radiation oncology. There is increasing trainee interest in the field of neuro-oncology and an increasing number of fellowship training programs, attracting applicants with backgrounds in neurology, neurosurgery and medical oncology. The present guide aims to provide some general recommendations for residents and fellows to help them make the most out of their neuro-oncology fellowship and enable them to start their careers as a neuro-oncologists on firm footing.

The purpose of this review is to summarize recent updates regarding immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in GBM patients including updates in brain immunology, clinical trials, mechanisms of resistance, and biomarkers of response. PubMed was searched to identify recent relevant articles on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy as it pertains to GBM. Clinicaltrials.gov was also searched to identify relevant clinical trials. The reported randomized phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (alone or in combination with standard therapy) have not demonstrated a survival benefit to date in either newly diagnosed or recurrent GBM. A small randomized surgical study of neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab suggested an increase in PFS and OS compared to adjuvant pembrolizumab only; further studies are needed to validate this finding. Despite the positive impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors in many cancers, only a small subset of GBM patients respond to these agents. Further research is needed to identify biomarkers of response and therapies to rationally combine with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Navtemadlin is an orally bioavailable small molecule that blocks the protein-protein interaction between murine double minute 2 protein (MDM2) and the tumor suppressor protein p53, leading to p53-mediated cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. It is being evaluated in clinical trials for a variety of malignancies, both as a single agent and in combination regimens. A sensitive, robust LC-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed to quantitate navtemadlin in plasma, and this method was also validated using brain tissue homogenate. Sample preparation involved protein precipitation of plasma or brain tissue homogenate using acetonitrile. Navtemadlin, navtemadlin glucuronide, and the internal standard, D

Background Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) contributes to tumor immunosuppression and is upregulated in aggressive meningiomas. We performed a phase II study of nivolumab, a programmed death 1 (PD-1) blocking antibody among patients with grade ≥2 meningioma that recurred after surgery and radiation therapy. Methods Twenty-five patients received nivolumab (240 mg biweekly) until progression, voluntary withdrawal, unacceptable toxicity, or death. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) and quantification of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) were evaluated as potential immunocorrelative biomarkers. Change in neurologic function was prospectively assessed using the Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale. Results Enrolled patients had multiple recurrences including ≥3 prior surgeries and ≥2 prior courses of radiation in 60% and 72%, respectively. Nivolumab was well tolerated with no unexpected adverse events. Six-month progression-free survival (PFS-6) rate was 42.4% (95% CI: 22.8, 60.7) and the median OS was 30.9 months (95% CI: 17.6, NA). One patient achieved radiographic response (ongoing at 4.5 years). TMB was >10/Mb in 2 of 15 profiled tumors (13.3%). Baseline TIL density was low but increased posttreatment in 3 patients including both patients with elevated TMB. Most patients who achieved PFS-6 maintained neurologic function prior to progression as assessed by NANO. Conclusion Nivolumab was well tolerated but failed to improve PFS-6, although a subset of patients appeared to derive benefit. Low levels of TMB and TIL density were typically observed. NANO assessment of neurologic function contributed to outcome assessment. Future studies may consider rationally designed combinatorial regimens.

Recent studies suggest that the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) pathway may be a therapeutic target for brain metastases (BM). Here, we present interim analysis of a basket trial evaluating the intracranial efficacy of the CDK inhibitor palbociclib in patients with progressive BM and CDK alterations. Our study met its primary endpoint and provides evidence for performing molecular testing of archival BM tissue, if available, to inform the choice of CNS-penetrant targeted therapy. Brastianos and colleagues report interim trial results on the intracranial clinical benefit of palbociclib for patients with progressive metastatic brain cancer carrying cyclin-dependent kinase pathway alterations.

Purpose of review Neurologic complications in patients with cancer can significantly impact morbidity and mortality. Although these complications can be seen in patients without cancer as well, the purpose of this review is to highlight how the presentation, etiology, and management of delirium, seizures, cerebrovascular disease, and central nervous system infections may be different in patients with cancer. Recent findings Some of the newer anticancer therapies are associated with neurologic complications. Delirium and seizures have been described in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and other immune effector cell therapies. Angiogenesis inhibitors can increase the risk of bleeding and clotting, including intracranial hemorrhage and stroke. The risk of opportunistic fungal infections, including aspergillosis, is elevated with the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib. Summary Providers should familiarize themselves with neurologic complications in patients with cancer because early diagnosis and intervention can improve outcomes. The differential diagnosis should be broad, including conventional causes as seen in patients who do not have cancer, with special consideration of etiologies specific to patients with cancer.

An increasing fraction of patients with metastatic cancer develop leptomeningeal dissemination of disease (LMD), and survival is dismal1–3. We conducted a single-arm, phase 2 study of pembrolizumab in patients with solid tumor malignancies and LMD (NCT02886585). Patients received 200 mg of pembrolizumab intravenously every 3 weeks until definitive progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was rate of overall survival at 3 months (OS3). Secondary objectives included toxicity, response rate and time to intracranial or extracranial disease progression. A Simon two-stage design was used to compare a null hypothesis OS3 of 18% against an alternative of 43%. Twenty patients—17 with breast cancer, two with lung cancer and one with ovarian cancer—were enrolled into the pre-specified evaluation group having received at least one dose of pembrolizumab. The median follow-up of surviving patients was 6.3 months (range, 2.2–12.5 months). The percentage of patients who experienced one (or more) grade 3 or higher adverse events at least possibly related to treatment was 40%, the most frequent being hyperglycemia (n = 6), nausea (n = 7) and vomiting (n = 7). The study met the primary endpoint, as 12 of 20 (OS3, 0.60; 90% confidence interval, 0.39–0.78) patients were alive at 3 months after enrollment. Pembrolizumab is safe and feasible and displays promising activity in patients with LMD. Further investigations are needed to identify which patients with LMD can benefit from pembrolizumab. In a phase 2 clinical trial cohort of patients with leptomeningeal disease, anti-PD-1 monotherapy was safe and associated with a 3-month overall survival of 60%.

A high tumour mutational burden (hypermutation) is observed in some gliomas1–5; however, the mechanisms by which hypermutation develops and whether it predicts the response to immunotherapy are poorly understood. Here we comprehensively analyse the molecular determinants of mutational burden and signatures in 10,294 gliomas. We delineate two main pathways to hypermutation: a de novo pathway associated with constitutional defects in DNA polymerase and mismatch repair (MMR) genes, and a more common post-treatment pathway, associated with acquired resistance driven by MMR defects in chemotherapy-sensitive gliomas that recur after treatment with the chemotherapy drug temozolomide. Experimentally, the mutational signature of post-treatment hypermutated gliomas was recapitulated by temozolomide-induced damage in cells with MMR deficiency. MMR-deficient gliomas were characterized by a lack of prominent T cell infiltrates, extensive intratumoral heterogeneity, poor patient survival and a low rate of response to PD-1 blockade. Moreover, although bulk analyses did not detect microsatellite instability in MMR-deficient gliomas, single-cell whole-genome sequencing analysis of post-treatment hypermutated glioma cells identified microsatellite mutations. These results show that chemotherapy can drive the acquisition of hypermutated populations without promoting a response to PD-1 blockade and supports the diagnostic use of mutational burden and signatures in cancer. Temozolomide therapy seems to lead to mismatch repair deficiency and hypermutation in gliomas, but not to an increase in response to immunotherapy.

Purpose: GDC-0084 is an oral, brain-penetrant small-molecule inhibitor of PI3K and mTOR. A first-in-human, phase I study was conducted in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. Patients and Methods: GDC-0084 was administered orally, once daily, to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and activity. Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET (FDG-PET) was performed to measure metabolic responses. Results: Forty-seven heavily pretreated patients enrolled in eight cohorts (2–65 mg). Dose-limiting toxicities included 1 case of grade 2 bradycardia and grade 3 myocardial ischemia (15 mg), grade 3 stomatitis (45 mg), and 2 cases of grade 3 mucosal inflammation (65 mg); the MTD was 45 mg/day. GDC-0084 demonstrated linear and dose-proportional PK, with a half-life (∼19 hours) supportive of once-daily dosing. At 45 mg/day, steady-state concentrations exceeded preclinical target concentrations producing antitumor activity in xenograft models. FDG-PET in 7 of 27 patients (26%) showed metabolic partial response. At doses ≥45 mg/day, a trend toward decreased median standardized uptake value in normal brain was observed, suggesting central nervous system penetration of drug. In two resection specimens, GDC-0084 was detected at similar levels in tumor and brain tissue, with a brain tissue/tumor-to-plasma ratio of >1 and >0.5 for total and free drug, respectively. Best overall response was stable disease in 19 patients (40%) and progressive disease in 26 patients (55%); 2 patients (4%) were nonevaluable. Conclusions: GDC-0084 demonstrated classic PI3K/mTOR–inhibitor related toxicities. FDG-PET and concentration data from brain tumor tissue suggest that GDC-0084 crossed the blood–brain barrier.

Background Targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) alone does not improve overall survival (OS) in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). The angiopoiein (Ang)-TIE2 system may play a role in tumor survival under VEGF inhibition. We conducted a phase 2, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of bevacizumab plus trebananib (a novel Fc fusion protein that sequesters Ang1/Ang2) over bevacizumab alone in rGBM. Methods Patients ≥18 years of age with a Karnofsky performance status ≥70 and GBM or variants in first or second relapse were randomized to bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus trebananib 15 mg/kg every week or bevacizumab plus placebo. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Results After an initial 6-patient lead-in cohort confirmed the safety of combining bevacizumab and trebananib, 115 eligible patients were randomized to the control (n = 58) or experimental treatment (n = 57). In the control arm, 6-month PFS was 41.1%, median survival time was 11.5 months (95% CI, 8.4-14.2 months), median PFS was 4.8 months (95% CI, 3.8-7.1 months), and radiographic response (RR) was 5.9%. In the experimental arm, 6-month PFS was 22.6%, median survival time was 7.5 months (95% CI, 6.8-10.1 months), median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.7-5.6 months), and RR was 4.2%. The rate of severe toxicities was not significantly different between arms. Conclusion The combination of bevacizumab and trebananib was well tolerated but did not significantly improve 6-month PFS rate, PFS, or OS for patients with rGBM over bevacizumab alone. The shorter PFS in the experimental arm with a hazard ratio of 1.51 (P = .04) suggests that the addition of trebananib to bevacizumab is detrimental.

Therapeutic advances for glioblastoma have been minimal over the past 2 decades. In light of the multitude of recent phase III trials that have failed to meet their primary endpoints following promising preclinical and early-phase programs, a Society for Neuro-Oncology Think Tank was held in November 2020 to prioritize areas for improvement in the conduct of glioblastoma clinical trials. Here, we review the literature, identify challenges related to clinical trial eligibility criteria and trial design in glioblastoma, and provide recommendations from the Think Tank. In addition, we provide a data-driven context with which to frame this discussion by analyzing key study design features of adult glioblastoma clinical trials listed on ClinicalTrials.gov as “recruiting” or “not yet recruiting” as of February 2021.

Background Targeted gene NGS testing is available through many academic institutions and commercial entities and is increasingly incorporated in practice guidelines for glioblastoma (GBM). This single-center retrospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of incorporating NGS results in the management of GBM patients at a clinical trials-focused academic center. Methods We identified 1011 consecutive adult patients with pathologically confirmed GBM (IDHwt or IDHmut) who had somatic tumor sequencing (Oncopanel, ~500 cancer gene panel) at DFCI from 2013–2019. Clinical records of all IDHwt GBM patients were reviewed to capture clinical trial enrollment and off-label targeted therapy use based on NGS results. Results Of the 557 IDHwt GBM patients with sequencing, 182 entered clinical trials at diagnosis (32.7%) and 213 (38.2%) entered after recurrence. Sequencing results for 130 patients (23.3%) were utilized for clinical trial enrollment for either targeted therapy indications (6.9 % upfront and 27.7% at recurrent clinical trials and 3.1% for off-label targeted therapy) or exploratory studies (55.4% upfront and 6.9% recurrent clinical trials). Median overall survival was 20.1 months with no survival difference seen between patients enrolled in clinical trials compared to those who were not, in a posthoc analysis. Conclusions While NGS testing has become essential for improved molecular diagnostics, our study illustrates that targeted gene panels remain underutilized for selecting therapy in GBM-IDHwt. Targeted therapy and clinical trial design remain to be improved to help leverage the potential of NGS in clinical care.

Stroke-like migraine attacks after radiation therapy (SMART) syndrome represents a rare but serious condition manifesting years after cranial radiation therapy (RT).1 Characterized by migraine-type headaches, stroke-like deficits, seizures, and MRI abnormalities, including cortical gyriform enhancement in irradiated brain regions, SMART is diagnostically and therapeutically challenging.2-6 Distinction from tumor progression is difficult and treatment options are limited.2 Although frequently reversible,5 SMART episodes can recur6 and effectuate persistent neurologic or imaging sequelae.3

Purpose of review To review the neurologic complications of systemic anti-cancer therapies and radiation therapy. Recent findings Although many of the newer systemic therapies have more favorable side effect profiles than traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy, neurotoxicity has been seen with some of newer targeted therapies, immunotherapy, and T cell engaging therapies, including CAR-T therapy. The most recent advances in radiation-induced neurotoxicity have focused on the prevention and the management of cognitive dysfunction, a known long-term complication of brain irradiation. Cancer therapies can damage both the central and the peripheral nervous systems, and the damage may not always be reversible. Neurologists and oncologists must be aware of the neurotoxicities associated with newer treatments, particularly CAR-T therapy and immunotherapy. Early recognition and appropriate management can help minimize neurologic injury.

INTRODUCTION High-grade meningiomas are associated with significant neuro-cognitive morbidity and a poor prognosis. Systemic therapies, to date, have demonstrated minimal efficacy. We recently found that high-grade meningiomas harbor an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and that programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression may contribute to the aggressive phenotype of these tumors. Therefore, we conducted a single-arm, open-label phase II trial evaluating efficacy of pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, in a cohort of 24 patients with recurrent and progressive grade II and III meningiomas. METHODS The primary endpoint was the rate of progression-free survival at 6 months. The trial distinguished between 6-month PFS (PFS-6) rates of 26% vs. 52%. If at least 10 patients demonstrated a 6-month PFS, among the 24 patients, the agent would be considered worthy of further study. This design has at least 88% power using an exact binomial test with a one-sided significance level of 0.1. RESULTS Between November 2017 to December 2019, twenty-four patients were enrolled. The majority of the patients in our cohort were heavily pre-treated; prior to enrolling to the study, twenty patients underwent more than one surgical resection and twelve patients had received more than one round of radiotherapy. Our study met its primary endpoint and achieved a 6-month progression-free survival rate of 0.50 (90% exact CI: 0.32-0.68) and a median PFS of 8.3 months (90% CI: 4.1-12.9 months). For the twelve patients who achieved the PFS-6 primary endpoint, median PFS from the start of treatment was 17.3 months (90% CI: 9.7 – 24.3 months). Four patients had grade-3 or higher adverse events that were at least possibly treatment-related, including colitis, skin infection, encephalopathy and transaminitis. CONCLUSION Our study achieved its primary endpoint. These results suggest that pembrolizumab exerts promising activity on these tumors and results in prolonged PFS compared to historical controls.

BACKGROUND Accurate response criteria are crucial for determining treatment efficacy. The response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria was developed to standardize response assessment in neuro-oncology. Modified RANO (m-RANO) criteria were recently proposed to address some limitations of the initial criteria including the use of a post-radiation baseline and an additional scan to confirm progression. We sought to identify differences in the association of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using RANO and m-RANO criteria. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) patients treated at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute from January 2013 until December 2019. Patients with available clinical and imaging data obtained before initiation of treatment, after radiation completion and at intervals of 1 to 3 months were included. MRIs were evaluated by two independent readers, and PD dates determined using RANO and m-RANO criteria. RESULTS 552 patients were included. 97.1% of the tumors were IDH wild-type. MGMT promoter was unmethylated in 51.4%, methylated in 35.1% and undetermined in 8.5%. Median OS among patients was 18.1 months. 72 patients (13%) did not have PD at the end of the study. 83 patients had treatment change while being clinically stable and without a confirmation scan and were excluded from the final analysis. PFS was 8.2 months with RANO and 8.4 months with mRANO. Difference in PD dates between RANO and m-RANO was detected in 76 patients (14%), where PFS was 3.5 months with RANO and 5.1 months with m-RANO. These patients had a worse median OS than those with identical RANO and m-RANO PD dates (15.2 vs. 22.4 months, p< 0.0001). CONCLUSION RANO and m-RANO criteria resulted in identical PFS for most patients. 14% of patients had discordant PD dates and a worse prognosis. These patients progressed early, and their PD was identified sooner with RANO criteria.

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is an increasingly common complication from solid tumor malignancies with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. We conducted a single arm Phase II study of combined ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with LMD from solid tumor malignancies (NCT02939300). Patients received manufacturer-specific dosing regimens of combined ipilimumab and nivolumab based on primary-tumor histology until definitive progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was rate of overall survival at 3 months (OS3). A Simon two-stage design was used to compare a null hypothesis OS3 of 18% against an alternative of 44%. Eighteen patients with diverse primary tumor histologies were enrolled and all received at least one dose of combined ipilimumab and nivolumab. Median follow up based on patients still alive was 8.0 months (range: 0.5 to 15.9 months). The study met its primary endpoint as 8 of 18 (OS3 0.44; 90% CI: 0.24 to 0.66) patients were alive at three months after enrollment. One third of patients experienced one (or more) grade-3 or higher adverse events possibly related to treatment. Two patients discontinued protocol treatment due to unacceptable toxicity (hepatitis and colitis, respectively). The most frequent adverse events overall included fatigue (N=7), nausea (N=6), fever (N=6), anorexia (N=6) and rash (N=6). Combined ipilimumab and nivolumab has an acceptable safety profile and demonstrates promising activity in LMD patients; this therapeutic approach should be studied in larger, multicenter clinical trials to validate these results as well as better identify patients who will benefit.

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a common complication from solid tumor malignancies with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. We present a single arm Phase II study of 18 patients with LMD receiving combined ipilimumab and nivolumab until progression or unacceptable toxicity (NCT02939300). The primary end point is overall survival at 3 months (OS3). Secondary end points include toxicity, cumulative time-to-progression at 3 months, and progression-free survival. A Simon two-stage design is used to compare a null hypothesis OS3 of 18% against an alternative of 44%. Median follow up based on patients still alive is 8.0 months (range: 0.5 to 15.9 months). The study has met its primary endpoint as 8 of 18 (OS3 0.44; 90% CI: 0.24 to 0.66) patients are alive at three months. One third of patients have experienced one (or more) grade-3 or higher adverse events. Two patients have discontinued protocol treatment due to unacceptable toxicity (hepatitis and colitis, respectively). The most frequent adverse events include fatigue (N = 7), nausea (N = 6), fever (N = 6), anorexia (N = 6) and rash (N = 6). Combined ipilimumab and nivolumab has an acceptable safety profile and demonstrates promising activity in LMD patients. Larger, multicenter clinical trials are needed to validate these results., Leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors are a rare complication with a very poor prognosis. Here the authors report the efficacy and safety of combined ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of solid tumor malignancies, with dire prognosis and no effective systemic treatment options. Over the past decade, the incidence of LMD has steadily increased due to therapeutics that have extended the survival of cancer patients, highlighting the need for new interventions. To examine the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with LMD, we completed two phase II clinical trials. Here, we investigate the cellular and molecular features underpinning observed patient trajectories in these trials by applying single-cell RNA and cell-free DNA profiling to longitudinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) draws from enrolled patients. We recover immune and malignant cell types in the CSF, characterize cell behavior changes following ICI, and identify genomic features associated with relevant clinical phenomena. Overall, our study describes the liquid LMD tumor microenvironment prior to and following ICI treatment and demonstrates clinical utility of cell-free and single-cell genomic measurements for LMD research., Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a serious complication of metastatic solid tumors with a poor prognosis. Here, by using single-cell RNA sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid, the authors report genomic and immune correlates of response to immunotherapy in two cohorts of patients with LMD treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Background Response to targeted therapy varies between patients for largely unknown reasons. Here, we developed and applied an integrative platform using mass spectrometry imaging (MSI), phosphoproteomics, and multiplexed tissue imaging for mapping drug distribution, target engagement, and adaptive response to gain insights into heterogeneous response to therapy. Methods Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) lines of glioblastoma were treated with adavosertib, a Wee1 inhibitor, and tissue drug distribution was measured with MALDI-MSI. Phosphoproteomics was measured in the same tumors to identify biomarkers of drug target engagement and cellular adaptive response. Multiplexed tissue imaging was performed on sister sections to evaluate spatial co-localization of drug and cellular response. The integrated platform was then applied on clinical specimens from glioblastoma patients enrolled in the phase 1 clinical trial. Results PDX tumors exposed to different doses of adavosertib revealed intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneity of drug distribution and integration of the heterogeneous drug distribution with phosphoproteomics and multiplexed tissue imaging revealed new markers of molecular response to adavosertib. Analysis of paired clinical specimens from patients enrolled in the phase 1 clinical trial informed the translational potential of the identified biomarkers in studying patient’s response to adavosertib. Conclusions The multimodal platform identified a signature of drug efficacy and patient-specific adaptive responses applicable to preclinical and clinical drug development. The information generated by the approach may inform mechanisms of success and failure in future early phase clinical trials, providing information for optimizing clinical trial design and guiding future application into clinical practice.

Opinion statement Clinical trials play a critical role in discovering new treatments, but the path to regulatory approval can be cumbersome and time consuming. Efforts to increase the efficiency and interpretability of clinical trials within the neuro-oncology community have focused on standardization of response assessment, development of consensus guidelines for clinical trial conduct, decentralization of clinical trials, removal of barriers to clinical trial accrual, and re-examination of patient eligibility criteria.

Background Responses to bevacizumab in glioblastoma (GBM) are not durable. Plasma levels of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) increase at the time of tumor progression. By targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), platelet‐derived growth factor receptor, Src, and FGF receptor pathways, ponatinib may potentially help to overcome some of the putative mechanisms of adaptive resistance. Methods We performed a phase II trial of ponatinib in patients with bevacizumab‐refractory GBM and variants. Adult patients with Karnofsky performance score (KPS) ≥60, measurable disease, and normal organ and marrow function received 45 mg ponatinib daily. No limit on the number of prior therapies but only one prior bevacizumab‐containing regimen was allowed. Primary endpoint was 3‐month progression‐free survival. Plasma biomarkers of angiogenesis and inflammation were evaluated before and after treatment. Results The study closed after the first stage. Fifteen patients enrolled: median age 61 [27‐74]; median KPS 80 [70‐90]; median number of prior relapses 2 [2‐4]. Three‐month progression‐free survival rate was 0, median overall survival was 98 days [95% CI 56, 257], and median PFS was 28 days [95% CI 27, 30]. No responses were seen. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events included fatigue (n = 3), hypertension (2), and lipase elevation (2). Ponatinib treatment significantly increased plasma VEGF, soluble (s)VEGFR1, sVEGFR2, sTIE2, interferon gamma (IFNγ), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF‐α), interleukin (IL)‐6, IL‐8, and IL‐10 and decreased sVEGFR2. Conclusions Ponatinib was associated with minimal activity in bevacizumab‐refractory GBM patients. Circulating biomarker data confirmed pharmacodynamic changes and suggested that resistance to ponatinib may be related to an increase in inflammatory cytokines., In this phase II trial, ponatinib was associated with minimal activity in bevacizumab‐refractory glioblastoma patients. Circulating biomarker data confirmed pharmacodynamic changes and suggested that resistance to ponatinib may be related to an increase in inflammatory cytokines.

IntroductionBrain metastases are the most common brain tumors in adults, whose management remains nuanced. Improved understanding of risk factors for surgical complications and mortality may guide treatment decisions.MethodsA nationwide, multicenter analysis was conducted with a retrospective cohort. Adult patients in the 2012-2015 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS NSQIP) databases who received a craniotomy for resection of brain metastasis were included.Results3500 cases were analyzed, of which 17% were considered frail and 24% were infratentorial. The most common 30-day medical complications were venous thromboembolism (3%, median time-to-event [TTE] 4.5 days), pneumonia (4%, median TTE 6 days), and urinary tract infections (2%, median TTE 5 days). Reoperation and unplanned readmission occurred in 5% and 12% of patients, respectively. Infratentorial approach and frailty were associated with reoperation before discharge (OR 2.0 for both; p=0.01 and p=0.03 respectively), but not after discharge. Infratentorial approaches conferred heightened risk for readmission for hydrocephalus (OR 5.1, p=0.02) and reoperation for cerebrospinal fluid diversion (OR 7.1, pConclusionsOptimization of metrics contributing to patient frailty and heightened surveillance in patients with infratentorial metastases may be considered in the peri-operative period.

On July 24, 2020, a workshop sponsored by the National Brain Tumor Society was held on innovating brain tumor clinical trials based on lessons learned from the COVID-19 experience. Various stakeholders from the brain tumor community participated including the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), academic and community clinicians, researchers, industry, clinical research organizations, patients and patient advocates, and representatives from the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the National Cancer Institute. This report summarizes the workshop and proposes ways to incorporate lessons learned from COVID-19 to brain tumor clinical trials including the increased use of telemedicine and decentralized trial models as opportunities for practical innovation with potential long-term impact on clinical trial design and implementation.

Tumoral hypoxia correlates with worse outcomes in glioblastoma (GBM). While bevacizumab is routinely used to treat recurrent GBM, it may exacerbate hypoxia. Evofosfamide is a hypoxia-targeting prodrug being tested for recurrent GBM. To characterize resistance to bevacizumab and identify those with recurrent GBM who may benefit from evofosfamide, we ascertained MRI features and hypoxia in patients with GBM progression receiving both agents. Thirty-three patients with recurrent GBM refractory to bevacizumab were enrolled. Patients underwent MR and 18F-FMISO PET imaging at baseline and 28 days. Tumor volumes were determined, MRI and 18F-FMISO PET-derived parameters calculated, and Spearman correlations between parameters assessed. Progression-free survival decreased significantly with hypoxic volume [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 2.46, P = 0.009] and increased significantly with time to the maximum value of the residue (Tmax) (HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.88, P = 0.01). Overall survival decreased significantly with hypoxic volume (HR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.12 to 12.61, p = 0.01), standardized relative cerebral blood volume (srCBV) (HR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.38, p = 0.02), and increased significantly with Tmax (HR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.62, p s = 0.77, P s = 0.75, P

BACKGROUND The Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT) is a phase II platform trial with Bayesian adaptive randomization and deep genomic profiling to more efficiently test experimental agents in newly diagnosed glioblastoma and to prioritize therapies for late-stage testing. METHODS In the ongoing INSIGhT trial, patients with newly diagnosed MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma are randomized to the control arm or one of three experimental therapy arms (CC-115, abemaciclib, and neratinib). The control arm therapy is radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide, and primary endpoint is overall survival. Randomization has been adapted based on Bayesian estimation of biomarker-specific probability of treatment impact on progression-free survival (PFS). All tumors undergo detailed molecular sequencing, and this is facilitated with the companion ALLELE protocol. To evaluate feasibility of this approach, we assessed the status of this ongoing trial. RESULTS Since INSIGhT was activated 4.3 years ago, it has expanded to include 12 sites across the United States. A total of 247 patients have been enrolled. Randomization probabilities have been repeatedly adjusted over time based upon early PFS results to alter the randomization ratio from standard 1:1:1:1 randomization. All three arms have completed accrual and efficacy estimates are available based upon comparison to the common control arm in context of relevant biomarkers. There are 87 patients alive and in follow-up, and there are ongoing plans to add additional arms to evaluate further treatments in the future. CONCLUSION The INSIGhT trial demonstrates that a multi-center Bayesian adaptive platform trial is a feasible and effective approach to help prioritize therapies and biomarkers for newly diagnosed GBM. The trial has maintained robust accrual, and the simultaneous testing of multiple agents, sharing a common control arm and adaptive randomization serve as features to increase trial efficiency relative to traditional clinical trial designs.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) While glioblastoma (GBM) is known to have increased incidence in males, recent work has identified possible sex-specific molecular differences that could be associated with improved clinical outcomes for female GBM patients. We evaluated sex-based differences in patient and tumor characteristics, and clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed GBM patients. MATERIALS/METHODS We reviewed 665 newly diagnosed adult IDH-wild type GBM patients with Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥60 who were treated at our institution from January 1, 2010 to May 30, 2019. Patient, tumor and treatment details were obtained from the electronic medical record. An unpaired t-test, Fisher's exact test and univariable/multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to evaluate associations, including progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS In our GBM cohort, 384 (57.7%) were male and 281 (42.3%) were female. There were no significant differences in age (60.6 years in males vs. 60.0 years in females, P = 0.16), KPS (KPS ≥90 in 46.1% in males vs. 43.4% in females, P = 0.53), extent of resection (gross total resection in 44.8% in males vs. 47.7% in females, P = 0.48), or prevalence of MGMT methylation (37.8% in males vs. 43.4% in females, P = 0.11). There were also no differences in receipt of temozolomide (95.1% of males vs. 95.7% of females, P = 0.71), radiation dose (≥59.4 Gy in 85.2% in males vs. 87.5% in females, P = 0.43), or clinical trial enrollment (24.7% males vs. 21.0% females, P = 0.27). Median OS was 22.5 months for females and 19.3 months for males (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% CI 1.03-1.48, P = 0.02). On multivariable analysis adjusted for age (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 1.04, 95% CI [1.03-1.05], P < 0.001), KPS ≥90 (AHR 0.73, 95% CI [0.60-0.89], P = 0.002), extent of resection (AHR 1.12, 95% CI 0.92-1.37, P = 0.26), and MGMT methylation status (AHR 0.38, 95% CI [0.31-0.47], P < 0.001), female sex (AHR 0.78, 95% CI [0.64-0.95], P = 0.015) was associated with improved OS. Superior OS in females was observed in MGMT unmethylated patients (HR 0.69, 95% CI [0.54-0.90], P = 0.005) but not in MGMT methylated patients (HR 0.85, 95% CI [0.64-1.14], P = 0.28). While age (AHR 1.02, 95% CI [1.02-1.03], P < 0.001), KPS ≥90 (AHR 0.79, 95% CI [0.66-0.95], P = 0.01), and MGMT methylation (AHR 0.40, 95% CI [0.33-0.49], P < 0.001) were associated with PFS, biologic sex was not associated with PFS (AHR 0.94, 95% CI [0.78-1.12], P = 0.49). CONCLUSION Female sex was associated with improved survival after adjustment of known clinical covariates in newly diagnosed GBM patients. Further study is necessary to understand biologic mechanism for sex-based differences in clinical outcome given implications for therapy development and clinical trial design. AUTHOR DISCLOSURE D.D. Shi: None. M. Lim-Fat: None. G.C. Youssef: None. S. Whorral: None. M. Allen: None. D.N. Cagney: None. S. Tanguturi: None. D. Haas-Kogan: Research Grant; Novartis; Cellworks. A.A. Aizer: Research Grant; Varian. Consultant; Novartis. Advisory Board; Seattle Genetics. J. McFaline-Figueroa: None. U.N. Chukwueke: None. E.Q. Lee: None. D.A. Reardon: Research Grant; Celldex, Inovio, Midatech. Consultant; Amgen. Speaker's Bureau; Merck/Schering, Roche/Genentech. Advisory Board; AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cavion, Celldex, EMD Serono, Juno Pharmaceuticals, Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Novocure, Oxigene, Regeneron, Roche/Genentech, Stemline. L. Nayak: None. W.L. Bi: Research Grant; The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, NIH/NCI.R. Beroukhim: Independent Contractor; Scorpion Therapeutics. Stock; Scorpion Therapeutics. K.L. Ligon: None. B.M. Alexander: Research Grant; Puma Biotechnology, Eli Lily, Celgene. Stock; Hoffman-La Roche. P.Y. Wen: None. R. Rahman: Research Grant; Project Data Sphere, LLC.

BACKGROUND Comprehensive next generation sequencing (NGS) is available through many academic institutions and commercial entities, and is incorporated in practice guidelines for glioblastoma (GBM). We retrospective evaluated the practice patterns and utility of incorporating NGS data into routine care of GBM patients at a clinical trials-focused academic center. METHODS We identified 1,011 consecutive adult patients with histologically confirmed GBM with OncoPanel testing, a targeted exome NGS platform of 447 cancer-associated genes at Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI), from 2013-2019. We selected and retrospectively reviewed clinical records of all IDH-wildtype GBM patients treated at DFCI. RESULTS We identified 557 GBM IDH-wildtype patients, of which 227 were male (40.7%). OncoPanel testing revealed 833 single nucleotide variants and indels in 44 therapeutically relevant genes (Tier 1 or 2 mutations) including PIK3CA (n=51), BRAF (n=9), FGFR1 (n=8), MSH2 (n=4), MSH6 (n=2) and MLH1 (n=1). Copy number analysis revealed 509 alterations in 18 therapeutically relevant genes including EGFR amplification (n= 186), PDGFRA amplification (N=39) and CDKN2A/2B homozygous loss (N=223). Median overall survival was 17.5 months for the whole cohort. Seventy-four therapeutic clinical trials accrued 144 patients in the upfront setting (25.9%) and 203 patients (36.4%) at recurrence. Altogether, NGS data for 107 patients (19.2%) were utilized for clinical trial enrollment or targeted therapy indications. High mutational burden (>17mutations/Mb) was identified in 11/464 samples (2.4%); of whom 3/11 received immune checkpoint blockade. Four patients received compassionate use therapy targeting EGFRvIII (rindopepimut, n=2), CKD4/6 (abemaciclib, n=1) and BRAFV600E (dabrafenib/trametinib, n=1). CONCLUSION While NGS has greatly improved diagnosis and molecular classification, we highlight that NGS remains underutilized in selecting therapy in GBM, even in a setting where clinical trials and off-label therapies are relatively accessible. Continued efforts to develop better targeted therapies and efficient clinical trial design are required to maximize the potential benefits of genomically-stratified data.

BACKGROUND The cyclin D-CDK4/6-Rb pathway is activated in most glioblastomas. Abemaciclib is a potent CDK4/6 inhibitor with good brain penetration approved for ER/PR/HER2- breast cancer. In order to efficiently evaluate the potential impact of abemaciclib on overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma and to simultaneously develop information regarding potential genomic biomarker associations, abemaciclib was included as an arm on the Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT) trial. INSIGhT is a phase II platform trial using response adaptive randomization and deep genomic profiling to more efficiently test experimental agents in MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma and potentially accelerate identification of novel therapies for phase III testing. Initial randomization was equal between abemaciclib, control, and two other experimental arms but subsequent randomization was adapted based on efficacy as determined by progression-free survival (PFS). Ineffective arms were discontinued and new arms added by protocol amendment. We report preliminary results for the abemaciclib arm which has completed accrual. METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma were randomized to receive either radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide at standard doses or standard radiochemotherapy followed by adjuvant abemaciclib (150–200 mg orally BID) without temozolomide. Treatment continued until progression or development of unacceptable toxicities. The primary endpoint was OS. Association between abemaciclib efficacy and cyclin D-CDK4/6-Rb pathway genomic alterations was also investigated. RESULTS There were 123 patients (50 control; 73 treated with abemaciclib). Abemaciclib was generally well-tolerated with no new toxicity signals identified. PFS was significantly longer (p=0.03, logrank test) with abemaciclib (median 6.31 months 95% CI [5.29, 8.18]) compared to the control arm (5.16 months 95% CI [4.37, 6.28]). 28/50 control and 36/73 abemaciclib patients remain alive. CONCLUSION Preliminary analysis suggests that abemaciclib increases PFS compared to control. Updated toxicity, PFS and survival data and potential genomic biomarker associations will be presented.