Search

Your search keyword '"Eugene Viscusi"' showing total 14 results
Start Over Author "Eugene Viscusi"
14 results on '"Eugene Viscusi"'

1. Recommendations for effective documentation in regional anesthesia: an expert panel Delphi consensus project

Author

Hassan M Ahmed, Benjamin P Atterton, Gillian G Crowe, Jaime L Barratta, Mark Johnson, Eugene Viscusi, Sanjib Adhikary, Eric Albrecht, Karen Boretsky, Jan Boublik, Dara S Breslin, Kelly Byrne, Alan Ch'ng, Alwin Chuan, Patrick Conroy, Craig Daniel, Andrzej Daszkiewicz, Alain Delbos, Dan Sebastian Dirzu, Dmytro Dmytriiev, Paul Fennessy, H Barrie J Fischer, Henry Frizelle, Jeff Gadsden, Philippe Gautier, Rajnish K Gupta, Yavuz Gürkan, Harold David Hardman, William Harrop-Griffiths, Peter Hebbard, Nadia Hernandez, Jakub Hlasny, Gabriella Iohom, Vivian H Y Ip, Christina L Jeng, Rebecca L Johnson, Hari Kalagara, Brian Kinirons, Andrew Kenneth Lansdown, Jody C Leng, Yean Chin Lim, Clara Lobo, Danielle B Ludwin, Alan James Robert Macfarlane, Anthony T Machi, Padraig Mahon, Stephen Mannion, David H McLeod, Peter Merjavy, Aleksejs Miscuks, Christopher H Mitchell, Eleni Moka, Peter Moran, Ann Ngui, Olga C Nin, Brian D O'Donnell, Amit Pawa, Anahi Perlas, Steven Porter, John-Paul Pozek, Humberto C Rebelo, Vicente Roqués, Kristopher M Schroeder, Gary Schwartz, Eric S Schwenk, Luc Sermeus, George Shorten, Karthikeyan Srinivasan, Markus F Stevens, Kassiani Theodoraki, Lloyd R Turbitt, Luis Fernando Valdés-Vilches, Thomas Volk, Katrina Webster, T Wiesmann, Sylvia H Wilson, Morné Wolmarans, Glenn Woodworth, Andrew K Worek, E M Louise Moran, Gürkan, Yavuz (ORCID 0000-0002-2307-6943 & YÖK ID 154129), Ahmed, Hassan M., Atterton, Benjamin P., Crowe, Gillian G., Barratta, Jaime L., Johnson, Mark, Viscusi, Eugene, Adhikary, Sanjib, Albrecht, Eric, Boretsky, Karen, Boublik, Jan, Breslin, Dara S., Byrne, Kelly, Ch'ng, Alan, Chuan, Alwin, Conroy, Patrick, Daniel, Craig, Daszkiewicz, Andrzej, Delbos, Alain, Dirzu, Dan Sebastian, Dmytriiev, Dmytro, Fennessy, Paul, Fischer, H. Barrie J., Frizelle, Henry, Gadsden, Jeff, Gautier, Philippe, Gupta, Rajnish K., Hardman, Harold David, Harrop-Griffiths, William, Hebbard, Peter, Hernandez, Nadia, Hlasny, Jakub, Iohom, Gabriella, Ip, Vivian H. Y., Jeng, Christina L. ., Johnson, Rebecca L., Kalagara, Hari, Kinirons, Brian, Lansdown, Andrew Kenneth, Leng, Jody C., Lim, Yean Chin, Lobo, Clara, Ludwin, Danielle B., Macfarlane, Alan James Robert, Machi, Anthony T., Mahon, Padraig, Mannion, Stephen, McLeod, David H., Merjavy, Peter, Miscuks, Aleksejs, Mitchell, Christopher H., Moka, Eleni, Moran, Peter, Ngui, Ann, Nin, Olga C., O'Donnell, Brian D., Pawa, Amit, Perlas, Anahi, Porter, Steven, Pozek, John-Paul, Rebelo, Humberto C., Roques, Vicente, Schroeder, Kristopher M., Schwartz, Gary, Schwenk, Eric S., Sermeus, Luc, Shorten, George, Srinivasan, Karthikeyan, Stevens, Markus F., Theodoraki, Kassiani, Turbitt, Lloyd R., Valdes-Vilches, Luis Fernando, Volk, Thomas, Webster, Katrina, Wiesmann, T., Wilson, Sylvia H., Wolmarans, Morne, Woodworth, Glenn, Worek, Andrew K., Moran, E. M. Louise, Koç University Hospital, School of Medicine, UCL - SSS/IONS/NEUR - Clinical Neuroscience, UCL - (SLuc) Service d'anesthésiologie, Anesthesiology, APH - Quality of Care, and Amsterdam Neuroscience - Neuroinfection & -inflammation

Subjects
Consensus, neuraxial, Delphi Technique, education, General Medicine, Documentation, international consensus, anesthesia, documentation, nerve block, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesiology, Anesthesia, Conduction, Nerve block, Regional anesthesia, Anesthesia, Neuraxial, Minimum standards, Delphi process, Humans, regional anesthesia, minimum standards
Abstract

Background and objectives: documentation is important for quality improvement, education, and research. There is currently a lack of recommendations regarding key aspects of documentation in regional anesthesia. The aim of this study was to establish recommendations for documentation in regional anesthesia. Methods: following the formation of the executive committee and a directed literature review, a long list of potential documentation components was created. A modified Delphi process was then employed to achieve consensus amongst a group of international experts in regional anesthesia. This consisted of 2 rounds of anonymous electronic voting and a final virtual round table discussion with live polling on items not yet excluded or accepted from previous rounds. Progression or exclusion of potential components through the rounds was based on the achievement of strong consensus. Strong consensus was defined as >= 75% agreement and weak consensus as 50%-74% agreement. Results: seventy-seven collaborators participated in both rounds 1 and 2, while 50 collaborators took part in round 3. In total, experts voted on 83 items and achieved a strong consensus on 51 items, weak consensus on 3 and rejected 29. Conclusion: by means of a modified Delphi process, we have established expert consensus on documentation in regional anesthesia., European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA); ASRA Pain Medicine

Published
2022

12. Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate Acute Pain. Panel discussion

Author

Bill, McCarberg, Robert L, Barkin, Leslie, Fish, Ronald J, Kulich, Louis, Kuritzky, Bruce D, Nicholson, Joshua, Rittenberg, Eugene, Viscusi, and Arthur L, Weaver

Subjects
Analgesics, Acute Disease, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Chronic Disease, Humans, Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors, Low Back Pain, Exercise Therapy
Published
2009

13. Phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response trial of intravenous adenosine for perioperative analgesia

Author

Ashraf S, Habib, Harold, Minkowitz, Timothy, Osborn, Babatunde, Ogunnaike, Keith, Candiotti, Eugene, Viscusi, Jiezhun, Gu, Mary R, Creed, Tong J, Gan, and Howard, Miller

Subjects
Adult, Adenosine, Adolescent, Sedation, Placebo, Perioperative Care, law.invention, Cohort Studies, Young Adult, Patient satisfaction, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Randomized controlled trial, Double-Blind Method, law, medicine, Humans, Adverse effect, Infusions, Intravenous, Aged, Pain Measurement, Pain, Postoperative, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, business.industry, Middle Aged, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Opioid, Anesthesia, Anesthetic, Morphine, Female, medicine.symptom, business, medicine.drug, Follow-Up Studies
Abstract

Background Adenosine regulates pain transmission by actions at spinal, supraspinal, and peripheral sites. A few studies have suggested that administration of adenosine might be associated with anesthetic- and analgesic-sparing effects. The primary aim of this multicenter study was to determine the dose-response profile of adenosine with respect to perioperative analgesia. Methods Women undergoing major gynecologic surgery were enrolled. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive one of four doses of adenosine (25, 50, 100, or 200 microg x kg x min) or matching placebo. A dose-escalation cohort approach was followed. Study drug administration was started in the operating room at the time of skin incision and discontinued at the end of surgery. The anesthetic technique was standardized. Postoperative analgesia was provided with a standardized morphine patient-controlled analgesia system. Data were collected in the hospital and after discharge daily through postoperative day 7. Results A total of 166 subjects received treatment with study drug: 125 received adenosine and 41 received placebo. Except for height, there were no differences between treatment groups with respect to demographic or baseline characteristics. Cumulative opioid use during the initial 24-h period after extubation was not significantly different between treatment groups. There were also no differences between treatment groups with respect to cumulative anesthetic use, intraoperative opioid requirements, pain scores, sedation, time to readiness for discharge from the postanesthesia care unit, time to readiness for discharge from the hospital, opioid-related symptom distress scores, patient satisfaction with pain control, and occurrence of adverse events. Conclusions There were no differences between placebo and adenosine with respect to efficacy and safety for perioperative analgesia.

Published
2008

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results