Search

Background: The majority (89%) of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients have an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in place. Due to the advances of modern-day LVAD therapy, more patients are on support for longer. This inevitably leads to more LVAD patients facing ICD generator battery depletion. Until now, there are insufficient data regarding periprocedural risks of generator replacements in a high-risk group like the LVAD cohort., Methods: A retrospective, single-center analysis of pocket-related outcomes of all ICD generator replacements in LVAD and Non-LVAD patients between January 2014 and December 2018. The primary outcome was the combined endpoint of clinically significant pocket hematoma and/or cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection in the first 6 months after ICD generator exchange. The clinically significant hematoma was defined as hematoma requiring reoperation, prolongation of hospitalization, or interruption of anticoagulation. The cumulative incidence function was calculated for the primary endpoint., Results: Two hundred seventy-seven patients underwent ICD generator exchange in our clinic in this time. Of these, 251 patients had a complete 6-month follow-up regarding clinically significant pocket hematomas and pocket infections. One hundred ninety patients had no LVAD, and 61 patients were on LVAD support. The rate of the primary combined endpoint clinically significant pocket hematoma and/or CIED infection was 3.5 times higher in LVAD patients compared to the non-LVAD cohort (event rate 39.14 vs 11.07 per 100 patient-years, p = 0.048). Clinically significant pocket hematomas necessitating revision occurred nearly 4 times more often in the LVAD group (p = 0.042). Pocket device infection rates were around 16 times higher in LVAD patients compared to non-LVAD patients (p = 0.002)., Conclusions: Compared to Non-LVAD patients, LVAD patients exhibit a relevant higher rate of clinically significant pocket hematoma and CIED infection after ICD generator exchange. This information should additionally be considered in the decision-making process regarding the indication for ICD generator exchange., (Copyright © 2022 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: With an increasing number of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), there has been a paralleled increase in demand for transvenous lead extraction (TLE). Cardiac surgeons (CS) and cardiologists perform TLE; however, data comparing the two groups of operators is scarce., Objective: We compared the outcomes of TLE performed by cardiologists and CS from six European lead extraction units., Method: Data was collected retrospectively of 2205 patients who had 3849 leads extracted (PROMET) between 2005 and 2018. Patient demographics and procedural outcomes were compared between the CS and cardiologist groups, using propensity score matching. A multivariate regression analysis was also performed for variables associated with 30-day mortality., Results: CS performed the majority of extractions (59.8%), of leads with longer dwell times (90 [57-129 interquartile range (IQR)] vs. 62 [31-102 IQR] months, CS vs. cardiologists, p < .001) and with pre-dominantly non-infectious indications (57.4% vs. 50.2%, CS vs. cardiologists, p < .001). CS achieved a higher complete success per lead than the cardiologists (98.1% vs. 95.7%, respectively, p < .01), with a higher number of minor complications (5.51% vs. 2.1%, p < .01) and similar number of major complications (0.47% vs. 1.3%, p = .12). Thirty-day mortality was similarly low in the CS and cardiologist groups (1.76% vs. 0.94%, p = .21). Unmatched data multivariate analysis revealed infection indication (OR 6.12 [1.9-20.3], p < .01), procedure duration (OR 1.01 [1.01-1.02], p < .01) and CS operator (OR 2.67, [1.12-6.37], p = .027) were associated with 30-day mortality., Conclusion: TLE by CS was performed with similar safety and higher efficacy compared to cardiologists in high and medium-volume lead extraction centers., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) therapy contributes to an improvement in morbidity and mortality across all patient demographics. Patient age is a recognized risk factor for unfavorable outcomes in invasive procedures. This is the largest series of non-laser transvenous lead extraction (TLE) evaluating the association between patient age and procedure outcomes., Methods: Data of 2205 (3849 leads) patients was collected retrospectively from six European TLE centers between January 2005-December 2018 in the PROMET study. Of these, 153 patients with 319 leads were excluded for incomplete data. A comparison of outcomes was performed between the age groups young [< 50 years], young intermediate [50-69 years], older intermediate [70-79 years], and octogenarian [≥80 years]., Results: Infection was most common indication for TLE in the octogenarian cohort, less common in the younger population (60.1% vs. 33.2%, respectively, p < .01). High-voltage leads were extracted most frequently from young patients, less frequently from octogenarians (31.6% vs. 10%, p < .001), while the opposite was evident for pacemaker leads (p < .001). Rotational sheath use was equally prevalent across all patient groups (p = .79). Minor and major complications across all the age groups were statistically similar, as was procedural success; the 30-day mortality was most significant in the octogenarian and least in the young patients (4.9% vs. 0.4%, p = .005). Propensity matching multivariate analysis found systemic infection, lead dwell time, and patient age (p = .013, OR 1.064 [1.013-1.116]) increased risk of 30-day mortality., Conclusion: TLE is safe and effective across all age groups. 30-day mortality risk is significantly higher in the older patients., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Aims: Several large studies have documented the outcome of transvenous lead extraction (TLE), focusing on laser and mechanical methods. To date there has been no large series addressing the results obtained with rotational lead extraction tools. This retrospective multicentre study was designed to investigate the outcomes of mechanical and rotational techniques., Methods and Results: Data were collected on a total of 2205 patients (age 66.0 ± 15.7 years) with 3849 leads targeted for extraction in six European lead extraction centres. The commonest indication was infection (46%). The targeted leads included 2879 pacemaker leads (74.8%), 949 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads (24.6%), and 21 leads for which details were unknown; 46.6% of leads were passive fixation leads. The median lead dwell time was 74 months [interquartile range (IQR) 41-112]. Clinical success was obtained in 97.0% of procedures, and complete extraction was achieved for 96.5% of leads. Major complications occurred in 22/2205 procedures (1%), with a peri-operative or procedure-related mortality rate of 4/2205 (0.18%). Minor complications occurred in 3.1% of procedures. A total of 1552 leads (in 992 patients) with a median dwell time of 106 months (IQR 66-145) were extracted using the Evolution rotational TLE tool. In this subgroup, complete success was obtained for 95.2% of leads with a procedural mortality rate of 0.4%., Conclusion: Patient outcomes in the PROMET study compare favourably with other large TLE trials, underlining the capability of rotational TLE tools and techniques to match laser methods in efficacy and surpass them in safety., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: Treatment of patients with systemic cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection with large lead vegetations is challenging and associated with relevant morbidity and mortality. To avoid complications from open surgical extraction, a novel approach with percutaneous aspiration of large vegetations prior to transvenous lead extraction was instituted. The results of this treatment concept were retrospectively analysed in this multicentre study., Methods and Results: One hundred and one patients [mean age 68.2 ± 13.1 (30-92) years] were treated in four centres for endovascular CIED infection with large lead vegetations. Mean lead vegetation size was 30.7 ± 13.5 mm. Two hundred and forty-seven leads were targeted for extraction (170 pacemaker leads, 77 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads). Mean lead implant duration was 81.7 (1-254) months. The transcatheter aspiration system with a specialized long venous drainage cannula and a funnel-shaped tip was based on a veno-venous extracorporeal circuit with an in-line filter. The aspiration of vegetations showed complete procedural success in 94.0% (n = 95), partial success in 5.0% (n = 5). Three major complications (3.0%) were encountered. Complete procedural success (per lead) of the subsequently performed transvenous lead extraction procedure was 99.2% (n = 245). Thirty-day mortality was 3.0% (n = 3). Five patients (5.0%) died in the further course on Days 51, 54, 68, 134, and 182 post-procedure (septic complications: n = 4; heart failure: n = 1)., Conclusion: The percutaneous aspiration procedure is highly effective and is associated with a low complication profile. The aspiration of vegetations immediately prior and during the lead extraction procedure may avoid septic embolization into the pulmonary circulation. This may potentially lead to a long-term survival benefit., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Treatment of patients with systemic infections of cardiac implantable electronic devices and large lead vegetations are a clinical challenge. In such situations patients potentially had to undergo open surgical extraction in the past. The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of a concomitant percutaneous, minimal-invasive aspiration procedure with the use of an extracorporeal circulation in transvenous lead extraction procedures in patients with large lead vegetations., Research Design and Methods: Prior and during transvenous lead extraction procedures lead vegetations were targeted for removal with a percutaneous aspiration technique based on a veno-venous extracorporeal circulation with an in-line filter. Clinical outcomes of the procedures were retrospectively analyzed., Results: This innovative and minimal-invasive treatment concept was used in 35 patients with systemic CIED infections (mean echocardiographic lead vegetation size 22.6 (12-40) mm). Complete procedural success of the aspiration procedure was seen in 88.6% of the patients. No major complication related to the aspiration procedure occurred. Clinical success of the concomitant transvenous lead extraction procedures (35 patients, 83 leads) was 97.1%., Conclusion: The presented data show that the aspiration procedure is safe and efficient as an adjunct in transvenous lead extraction procedures avoiding the need for open surgical extraction in such cases.