Search

Your search keyword '"Eun Kim Sung"' showing total 17 results
Start Over Author "Eun Kim Sung"
17 results on '"Eun Kim Sung"'

2. The usual suspects?: attitudes towards immigration during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Author

Eun Kim, Sung, Shin, Adrian J., and Yang, Yujeong

Abstract

COVID-19 has intensified public apprehension about foreigners. In this article, we examine two questions related to public opinion on immigration. First, we assess the importance of cultural and economic factors in studying why individuals support or oppose immigration. Second, we examine the role of public health concerns in shaping attitudes towards open borders by priming the vaccination status of immigrants and the number of COVID-19 cases in their home countries. Using a conjoint analysis based on the data provided by nearly 1,700 respondents in South Korea, we find empirical support for both the existing explanations and public health concerns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

9. A randomized trial of FOLFIRI versus docetaxel and cisplatin as a second-line chemotherapy after failure of first-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer

Author

Kang Lee Yong, Seok Moon Hee, Eun Kim Sung, Chul Park Jun, Sun Kim Eun, seok jang jin, Kil Lee Sang, Young Cho Joo, and Hyung Lee Si

Subjects
Cisplatin, Oncology, medicine.medical_specialty, business.industry, Hematology, Advanced gastric cancer, Second line chemotherapy, law.invention, Randomized controlled trial, Docetaxel, law, Internal medicine, medicine, FOLFIRI, First line chemotherapy, business, medicine.drug
Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

12. Development of an E-Learning System for the Endoscopic Diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer: an International Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Author

Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC), Yao, Kenshi, Uedo, Noriya, Muto, Manabu, Ishikawa, Hideki, Cardona, Hector J., Castro Filho, Elio C., Pittayanon, Rapat, Olano, Carolina, Yao, Fang, Parra Blanco, Adolfo, Shiaw Hooi, Ho, Avendano Alvarado, Gerardo, Piscoya, Alejandro, Fedorov, Evgeny, Bialek, Andrzej P., Mitrakov, Alexandr, Caro, Luis E., Gonen, Can, Dolwani, Sunil, Farca, Alberto, Cuaresma, Liz F., Bonilla, Juan J., Kasetsermwiriya, Wisit, Ragunath, Krish, Eun Kim, Sung, Marini, Mario, Li, Hanhua, Cimmino, Daniel G., Piskorz, Maria M., Lacopini, Federico, So, Jimmy B., Yamazaki, Kendi, Kim, Gwang H.A, Leong Ang, Tiing, Milhomem Cardoso, Daniela M., Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC), Yao, Kenshi, Uedo, Noriya, Muto, Manabu, Ishikawa, Hideki, Cardona, Hector J., Castro Filho, Elio C., Pittayanon, Rapat, Olano, Carolina, Yao, Fang, Parra Blanco, Adolfo, Shiaw Hooi, Ho, Avendano Alvarado, Gerardo, Piscoya, Alejandro, Fedorov, Evgeny, Bialek, Andrzej P., Mitrakov, Alexandr, Caro, Luis E., Gonen, Can, Dolwani, Sunil, Farca, Alberto, Cuaresma, Liz F., Bonilla, Juan J., Kasetsermwiriya, Wisit, Ragunath, Krish, Eun Kim, Sung, Marini, Mario, Li, Hanhua, Cimmino, Daniel G., Piskorz, Maria M., Lacopini, Federico, So, Jimmy B., Yamazaki, Kendi, Kim, Gwang H.A, Leong Ang, Tiing, and Milhomem Cardoso, Daniela M.

Abstract

Background: Gastric cancer is the second highest cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Apart from Japan and Korea where screening programs are implemented, most gastric cancer patients worldwide are diagnosed at an advanced stage because of limited knowledge and experience of endoscopists. An internet-based e-learning system to teach detection of early gastric cancer using standard endoscopy has been developed and this study evaluated its effectiveness. Methods: The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial. Participants worldwide signed a consent form before first undertaking a pre-test via the internet, after which they were randomly allocated to the e-learning and non-e-learning groups. Pre-adjustment strata were the pre-test score, experience of endoscopy, being a nurse endoscopist or a medical practitioner, and medical institution and country. Only the participants in the e-learning group were allowed to access the e-learning system, which consisted of video lectures on basic knowledge and self-exercise tests to accumulate experience. A post-test in both groups was conducted 2 months after the pre-test. The pre-determined primary endpoint was the difference in the rate of improvement of the test result (post-test score/pre-test score) between groups. After completion of the post-test, the e-learning system was opened for all participants. Results: Among the 515 endoscopists from 35 countries assessed for eligibility, 322 participants who met the study’s inclusion criteria completed the pre-test and were enrolled: 166 were allocated to the e-learning group and 166 to the non-e-learning. Of these, 151 participants in the e-learning group and 144 in the non-e-learning group completed the post-test, and were included in the analysis. The mean rate of improvement (standard deviation) of the test result in the e-learning and non-elearning groups was 1.24 (0.26) and. 1.00 (0.16), respectively (P!0.001, Student’s ttest). Conclusion: This global study clearly demo, Trabajo presentado en el DDW2015 Digestive Disease Week (DDW 2015), desarrolado del 16 al 19 de Mayo, 2015 en la ciudad de Washington DC, EE.UU

Published
2015

13. Environmental public opinion in U.S. states, 1973–2012.

Author

Eun Kim, Sung and Urpelainen, Johannes

Subjects
*POLARIZATION (Economics), *LABOR supply, *JOB skills, *ECONOMIC policy, *ECONOMIC security, *POLITICAL science, *SOCIAL influence, *LEGISLATORS
Abstract

Partisan polarization of public opinion is a major trend in American environmental politics. While the national pattern is widely recognized, scholars know much less about the polarization of public opinion over time at the state level. This lack of knowledge is unfortunate because geographic variation in the polarization of opinion is essential for explaining the origins of partisan polarization and evaluating its consequences for policy. To fill the gap, the multilevel regression and poststratification technique is applied to provide credible estimates of state-level environmental public opinion for both Democrats and Republicans, 1973–2012. It appears that the growing partisan gap reflects increased pro-environmental opinion among Democrats across many states, whereas Republican state-level public opinion is converging toward a much lower baseline. Cross-state variation among both parties has decreased over time, contributing to greater partisan polarization in the aggregate. Changes in the sorting of voters in and out of political parties cannot explain these patterns of polarization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results