Search

Cardiovascular and respiratory diseases are frequently associated with transient and prolonged hypoxia, whereas hypoxia exerts pro-hypertensive effects, through stimulation of the sympathetic system and release of pressor endocrine factors. This review is focused on the role of arginine vasopressin (AVP) in dysregulation of the cardiovascular system during hypoxia associated with cardiovascular disorders. AVP is synthesized mainly in the neuroendocrine neurons of the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) and supraoptic nucleus (SON), which send axons to the posterior pituitary and various regions of the central nervous system (CNS). Vasopressinergic neurons are innervated by multiple neuronal projections releasing several neurotransmitters and other regulatory molecules. AVP interacts with V1a, V1b and V2 receptors that are present in the brain and peripheral organs, including the heart, vessels, lungs, and kidneys. Release of vasopressin is intensified during hypernatremia, hypovolemia, inflammation, stress, pain, and hypoxia which frequently occur in cardiovascular patients, and blood AVP concentration is markedly elevated in cardiovascular diseases associated with hypoxemia. There is evidence that hypoxia stimulates AVP release through stimulation of chemoreceptors. It is suggested that acting in the carotid bodies, AVP may fine-tune respiratory and hemodynamic responses to hypoxia and that this effect is intensified in hypertension. There is also evidence that during hypoxia, augmentation of pro-hypertensive effects of vasopressin may result from inappropriate interaction of this hormone with other compounds regulating the cardiovascular system (catecholamines, angiotensins, natriuretic peptides, steroids, nitric oxide). In conclusion, current literature indicates that abnormal mutual interactions between hypoxia and vasopressin may significantly contribute to pathogenesis of hypertension.

Pregnancy and early life create specific psychosomatic challenges for the mother and child, such as changes in hemodynamics, resetting of the water-electrolyte balance, hypoxia, pain, and stress, that all play an important role in the regulation of the release of oxytocin and vasopressin. Both of these hormones regulate the water-electrolyte balance and cardiovascular functions, maturation of the cardiovascular system, and cardiovascular responses to stress. These aspects may be of particular importance in a state of emergency, such as hypertension in the mother or severe heart failure in the child. In this review, we draw attention to a broad spectrum of actions exerted by oxytocin and vasopressin in the pregnant mother and the offspring during early life. To this end, we discuss the following topics: 1) regulation of the secretion of oxytocin and vasopressin and expression of their receptors in the pregnant mother and child, 2) direct and indirect effects of oxytocin and vasopressin on the cardiovascular system in the healthy mother and fetus, and 3) positive and negative consequences of altered secretion of oxytocin and vasopressin in the mother with cardiovascular pathology and in the progeny with heart failure. The present survey provides evidence that moderate stimulation of the oxytocin and vasopressin receptors plays a beneficial role in the healthy pregnant mother and fetus; however, under pathophysiological conditions the inappropriate action of these hormones exerts several negative effects on the cardiovascular system of the mother and progeny and may potentially contribute to the pathophysiology of heart failure in early life.

The cardiovascular system and the central nervous system (CNS) closely cooperate in the regulation of primary vital functions. The autonomic nervous system and several compounds known as cardiovascular factors, especially those targeting the renin–angiotensin system (RAS), the vasopressin system (VPS), and the oxytocin system (OTS), are also efficient modulators of several other processes in the CNS. The components of the RAS, VPS, and OTS, regulating pain, emotions, learning, memory, and other cognitive processes, are present in the neurons, glial cells, and blood vessels of the CNS. Increasing evidence shows that the combined function of the RAS, VPS, and OTS is altered in neuropsychiatric/neurodegenerative diseases, and in particular in patients with depression, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, autism, and schizophrenia. The altered function of the RAS may also contribute to CNS disorders in COVID-19. In this review, we present evidence that there are multiple causes for altered combined function of the RAS, VPS, and OTS in psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders, such as genetic predispositions and the engagement of the RAS, VAS, and OTS in the processes underlying emotions, memory, and cognition. The neuroactive pharmaceuticals interfering with the synthesis or the action of angiotensins, vasopressin, and oxytocin can improve or worsen the effectiveness of treatment for neuropsychiatric/neurodegenerative diseases. Better knowledge of the multiple actions of the RAS, VPS, and OTS may facilitate programming the most efficient treatment for patients suffering from the comorbidity of neuropsychiatric/neurodegenerative and cardiovascular diseases.

Vasopressin (AVP) is a key neurohormone involved in the regulation of body functions. Due to its urine-concentrating effect in the kidneys, it is often referred to as antidiuretic hormone. Besides its antidiuretic renal effects, AVP is a potent neurohormone involved in the regulation of arterial blood pressure, sympathetic activity, baroreflex sensitivity, glucose homeostasis, release of glucocorticoids and catecholamines, stress response, anxiety, memory, and behavior. Vasopressin is synthesized in the paraventricular (PVN) and supraoptic nuclei (SON) of the hypothalamus and released into the circulation from the posterior lobe of the pituitary gland together with a C-terminal fragment of pro-vasopressin, known as copeptin. Additionally, vasopressinergic neurons project from the hypothalamus to the brainstem nuclei. Increased release of AVP into the circulation and elevated levels of its surrogate marker copeptin are found in pulmonary diseases, arterial hypertension, heart failure, obstructive sleep apnoea, severe infections, COVID-19 due to SARS-CoV-2 infection, and brain injuries. All these conditions are usually accompanied by respiratory disturbances. The main stimuli that trigger AVP release include hyperosmolality, hypovolemia, hypotension, hypoxia, hypoglycemia, strenuous exercise, and angiotensin II (Ang II) and the same stimuli are known to affect pulmonary ventilation. In this light, we hypothesize that increased AVP release and changes in ventilation are not coincidental, but that the neurohormone contributes to the regulation of the respiratory system by fine-tuning of breathing in order to restore homeostasis. We discuss evidence in support of this presumption. Specifically, vasopressinergic neurons innervate the brainstem nuclei involved in the control of respiration. Moreover, vasopressin V1a receptors (V1aRs) are expressed on neurons in the respiratory centers of the brainstem, in the circumventricular organs (CVOs) that lack a blood-brain barrier, and on the chemosensitive type I cells in the carotid bodies. Finally, peripheral and central administrations of AVP or antagonists of V1aRs increase/decrease phrenic nerve activity and pulmonary ventilation in a site-specific manner. Altogether, the findings discussed in this review strongly argue for the hypothesis that vasopressin affects ventilation both as a blood-borne neurohormone and as a neurotransmitter within the central nervous system. Copyright © 2021 Proczka, Przybylski, Cudnoch-Jedrzejewska, Szczepanska-Sadowska and Żera.

The neurons secreting oxytocin (OXY) and vasopressin (AVP) are located mainly in the supraoptic, paraventricular, and suprachiasmatic nucleus of the brain. Oxytocinergic and vasopressinergic projections reach several regions of the brain and the spinal cord. Both peptides are released from axons, soma, and dendrites and modulate the excitability of other neuroregulatory pathways. The synthesis and action of OXY and AVP in the peripheral organs (eye, heart, gastrointestinal system) is being investigated. The secretion of OXY and AVP is influenced by changes in body fluid osmolality, blood volume, blood pressure, hypoxia, and stress. Vasopressin interacts with three subtypes of receptors: V1aR, V1bR, and V2R whereas oxytocin activates its own OXTR and V1aR receptors. AVP and OXY receptors are present in several regions of the brain (cortex, hypothalamus, pons, medulla, and cerebellum) and in the peripheral organs (heart, lungs, carotid bodies, kidneys, adrenal glands, pancreas, gastrointestinal tract, ovaries, uterus, thymus). Hypertension, myocardial infarction, and coexisting factors, such as pain and stress, have a significant impact on the secretion of oxytocin and vasopressin and on the expression of their receptors. The inappropriate regulation of oxytocin and vasopressin secretion during ischemia, hypoxia/hypercapnia, inflammation, pain, and stress may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases.

The present study was designed to determine the role of centrally acting oxytocin (OT) in the regulation of blood pressure during chronic mild stress (CMS) in spontaneously hypertensive (SHR; n = 36) and normotensive Wistar-Kyoto (WKY; n = 38) rats. The rats were implanted with osmotic minipumps for intracerebroventricular infusions of 0.9% NaCl, OT, and oxytocin receptor antagonist (OTANT) and divided into two groups: SHR and WKY 1) exposed to 4-wk CMS and 2) not exposed to stress (controls). After 4 wk, hemodynamic parameters were recorded at rest and after an application of acute stressor [air-jet stress (AJS)]. Resting mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was significantly lower in CMS-exposed SHR and WKY infused with OT than in the corresponding groups receiving saline. Exposure to CMS exaggerated the AJS-dependent pressor response in WKY receiving saline but not in the corresponding group of SHR. OT infusion reduced the AJS-dependent pressor response in both CMS-exposed and not exposed SHR and in CMS-exposed WKY. Intracerebroventricular infusion of OTANT potentiated the AJS-dependent pressor response in both stressed and not stressed WKY rats but not in SHR. The results show that centrally delivered OT decreases resting MAP during CMS in both SHR and WKY rats and that in SHR it reduces pressor responses to AJS under control and CMS conditions, whereas in WKY this effect is significant only after CMS exposure. The study indicates that endogenous centrally acting OT may play an essential role in buffering pressor responses to AJS in CMS-exposed and not exposed WKY rats and that this function is significantly impaired in SHR.

The automatism of cardiac pacemaker cells, which is tuned, is regulated by the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and multiple endocrine and paracrine factors, including cardiovascular peptides. The cardiovascular peptides (CPs) form a group of essential paracrine factors affecting the function of the heart and vessels. They may also be produced in other organs and penetrate to the heart via systemic circulation. The present review draws attention to the role of vasopressin (AVP) and some other cardiovascular peptides (angiotensins, oxytocin, cytokines) in the regulation of the cardiovascular system in health and cardiovascular diseases, especially in post-infarct heart failure, hypertension and cerebrovascular strokes. Vasopressin is synthesized mostly by the neuroendocrine cells of the hypothalamus. There is also evidence that it may be produced in the heart and lungs. The secretion of AVP and other CPs is markedly influenced by changes in blood volume and pressure, as well as by other disturbances, frequently occurring in cardiovascular diseases (hypoxia, pain, stress, inflammation). Myocardial infarction, hypertension and cardiovascular shock are associated with an increased secretion of AVP and altered responsiveness of the cardiovascular system to its action. The majority of experimental studies show that the administration of vasopressin during ventricular fibrillation and cardiac arrest improves resuscitation, however, the clinical studies do not present consisting results. Vasopressin cooperates with the autonomic nervous system (ANS), angiotensins, oxytocin and cytokines in the regulation of the cardiovascular system and its interaction with these regulators is altered during heart failure and hypertension. It is likely that the differences in interactions of AVP with ANS and other CPs have a significant impact on the responsiveness of the cardiovascular system to vasopressin in specific cardiovascular disorders.

Vasopressin (AVP) and its receptors play a pivotal role in maintaining body homeostasis under physiological and pathophysiological conditions. As a consequence, the vasopressin system has emerged as an important target for both diagnostic and therapeutic applications in a number of medical conditions. Stoichiometric generation of AVP with copeptin, which is relatively accessible in the blood for measurements, makes copeptin a valuable surrogate of AVP. In this review, we present the regulation of release of AVP and activation of V1a, V1b, and V2 vasopressin receptors under physiological and pathological conditions. We make a survey of the role of AVP in: the regulation of the cardiovascular system; body fluid osmolality; natraemia; endocrine regulation; food intake; metabolism; circadian rhythmicity, immunological processes; and in the formation of learning, memory, cognition, and emotional and social behaviours. We also discuss the significance of the inappropriate functioning of the vasopressin system for: the development of cardiovascular diseases; disturbances of the water-electrolyte balance; energy metabolism; inflammatory processes; pain; neurogenic stress; memory disorders; depression; anxiety; autism; and schizophrenia. The structure and biological properties of peptide and non-peptide agonists and antagonists of V1a, V1b and V2 vasopressin receptors are presented and the potential use of copeptin and the current and likely indications for AVP agonists and antagonists in the diagnosis and therapeutics of multiple pathological conditions is discussed.

Based on the available literature, it can be assumed that in cases of post-infarct heart failure (HF) and obesity, a significant change in the central regulation of the cardiovascular system takes place with, among others, the involvement of the apelinergic system. The main objective of the present study was to clarify the role of apelin-13 in the central regulation of the cardiovascular system in Sprague Dawley rats with HF or sham operated (SO) and fed on a normal fat (NFD) or a high fat diet (HFD). The study was divided into two parts: Part I, hemodynamic studies; and Part II, biochemical and molecular studies. The animals were subjected to the following research procedures. Part I and II: feeding NFD or HFD; experimental induction of HF or SO; Part I: intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion of the examined substances, monitoring of mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) and heart rate (HR); Part II: venous blood and tissue samples collected. ICV infusion of apelin-13 caused significantly higher changes in ΔMABP in the SO NFD group. No changes were noted in ΔHR in any of the studied groups. Apelin and apelin receptor (APJ) mRNA expression in the brain and adipose tissues was higher in the HF rats. HFD causes significant increase in expression of apelin and APJ mRNA in the left ventricle. In conclusion, HF and HFD appear to play an important role in modifying the activity of the central apelinergic system and significant changes in mRNA expression of apelin and APJ receptor.

Ultrasound examination of the heart is a cornerstone of clinical evaluation of patients with established or suspected cardiovascular conditions. Advancements in ultrasound imaging technology have brought transthoracic echocardiography to preclinical murine models of cardiovascular diseases. The translational potential of cardiac ultrasound is critically important in rat models of myocardial infarction and ischemia-reperfusion injury, congestive heart failure, arterial hypertension, cardiac hypertrophy, pulmonary hypertension, right heart failure, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathies, developmental disorders, and metabolic syndrome. Modern echocardiographic machines capable of high-frame-rate image acquisition and fitted with high-frequency transducers allow for cardiac ultrasound in rats that yields most of the echocardiographic measurements and indices recommended by international guidelines for cardiac ultrasound in human patients. Among them are dimensions of cardiac chambers and walls, indices of systolic and diastolic cardiac function, and valvular function. In addition, measurements of cardiac dimensions and ejection fraction can be significantly improved by intravenous administration of ultrasound enhancing agents (UEAs). In this article we discuss echocardiography in rats, describe a technique for minimally invasive intravenous administration of UEAs via the saphenous vein and present a step-by-step approach to cardiac ultrasound in rats.

BACKGROUND Orexin A (OXA) and vasopressin (AVP) exert a central hypertensive effect due to an increase in sympathetic nerve activity. To date, little is known about the interaction of these 2 neuropeptides in the central regulation of blood pressure. The present study compared the consequences of infusion into the left cerebral ventricle (ICV) of OXA on mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) in normotensive (WKY) and spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) rats, and explored whether the central pressor action of OXA in these 2 strains depends on activation of brain AVP V1a receptors (V1aR). MATERIAL AND METHODS Ten groups of experiments were performed on 12-week-old WKY and SHR rats implanted with ICV cannulas for infusion of OXA (3 nmol) and V1aR antagonist (V1aRANT, 500 ng), administered separately and together. Levels of V1aR and OXR in the medulla oblongata of WKY and SHR rats were compared in separate series. RESULTS We found that: 1) OXA significantly increased MABP only in WKY rats, 2) V1aRANT prevented an increase in MABP induced by OXA in WKY rats and decreased MABP in SHR rats, 3) OXA abolished the hypotensive action of V1aRANT in SHR rats, and 4) SHR rats had significantly higher levels of OX1R and V1aR proteins and OX1R mRNA in the brain medulla. CONCLUSIONS The present study shows that OXA and AVP can interact in the brain to affect blood pressure regulation, and that this interaction differs in normotension and hypertension.

In many instances, the perception of pain is disproportionate to the strength of the algesic stimulus. Excessive or inadequate pain sensation is frequently observed in cardiovascular diseases, especially in coronary ischemia. The mechanisms responsible for individual differences in the perception of cardiovascular pain are not well recognized. Cardiovascular disorders may provoke pain in multiple ways engaging molecules released locally in the heart due to tissue ischemia, inflammation or cellular stress, and through neurogenic and endocrine mechanisms brought into action by hemodynamic disturbances. Cardiovascular neuropeptides, namely angiotensin II (Ang II), angiotensin-(1-7) [Ang-(1-7)], vasopressin, oxytocin, and orexins belong to this group. Although participation of these peptides in the regulation of circulation and pain has been firmly established, their mutual interaction in the regulation of pain in cardiovascular diseases has not been profoundly analyzed. In the present review we discuss the regulation of the release, and mechanisms of the central and systemic actions of these peptides on the cardiovascular system in the context of their central and peripheral nociceptive (Ang II) and antinociceptive [Ang-(1-7), vasopressin, oxytocin, orexins] properties. We also consider the possibility that they may play a significant role in the modulation of pain in cardiovascular diseases. The rationale for focusing attention on these very compounds was based on the following premises (1) cardiovascular disturbances influence the release of these peptides (2) they regulate vascular tone and cardiac function and can influence the intensity of ischemia - the factor initiating pain signals in the cardiovascular system, (3) they differentially modulate nociception through peripheral and central mechanisms, and their effect strongly depends on specific receptors and site of action. Accordingly, an altered release of these peptides and/or pharmacological blockade of their receptors may have a significant but different impact on individual sensation of pain and comfort of an individual patient.

This review considers a link between prematurity and autism by comparing symptoms, physiological abnormalities, and behavior. It focuses on the bidirectional signaling between the microbiota and the brain, here defined as the microbiota-gut-vagus-heart-brain (MGVHB) axis and its systemic disruption accompanying altered neurodevelopment. Data derived from clinical and animal studies document increased prevalence of gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, cognitive, and behavioral symptoms in both premature and autistic children and suggest an incomplete maturation of the gut-blood barrier resulting in a “leaky gut,” dysbiosis, abnormalities in vagal regulation of the heart, altered development of specific brain regions, and behavior. Furthermore, this review posits the hypothesis that common genetic variants link the abnormalities in the MGVHB axis in premature and autistic pathologies. This hypothesis is based on the recently identified common genetic variants: early B cell factor 1 (EBF1), selenocysteine tRNA-specific eukaryotic elongation factor (EEFSEC), and angiotensin II receptor type 2 (AGTR2), in the maternal and infant DNA samples, associated with risk of preterm birth and independently implicated in a risk of autism. We predict that the AGTR2 variants involved in the brain maturation and oxytocin-arginine-vasopressin (OXT-AVP) pathways, related to social behavior, will contribute to our understanding of the link between prematurity and autism paving a way to new therapies.

Rationale Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) can provide accurate data containing the spatial distribution of endogenous peptides in tissue sections without previous treatment. One of the key issues in analyzing small samples is establishing a proper technique for mounting and manipulating collected tissue in order to avoid contamination of the sample with optimal cutting temperature (OCT) resin. Methods We present a method for embedding rat pituitary tissue in a frozen egg yolk block, which enables its further imaging in experiments on a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometer with time-of-flight (TOF) analyzer. Embedding the sample in the egg yolk prevents contamination from the OCT resin, which decreases MALDI signal quality. Results In the present study we detected numerous m/z peaks related to endogenous peptides. We identified fifteen peptides and their post-translational modifications by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) directly on tissue sections of the hypophysis posterior and intermediate lobes; among these peptides were vasopressin, oxytocin, copeptin, melanocyte-stimulating hormones and beta-endorphin. We also showed that egg yolk itself does not affect localization of peptides in the pituitary. Conclusions Egg yolk embedding enables preparation of tissue sections from small tissue fragments to organs such as the pituitary gland, which is suitable for localization and identification of endogenous peptides by the MALDI-MSI and MALDI-MS/MS techniques. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Chronic mild stress (CMS) and myocardial infarction (MI) induce anhedonia, which is one of the symptoms of depression. The purpose of this study was to determine the role of the central V1 vasopressin receptors (V1R) in post-CMS and post-MI anhedonia. To this end, we investigated the effect of blockage the central V1R [28days of intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion of V1 receptors antagonist (V1RANT)] on CMS-induced and the post-infarct anhedonia. The experiments were conducted on conscious MI or sham-operated (SO) rats that were either exposed to CMS for 20days or remained at rest. The sucrose/water intake ratio (S/W) was measured to determine hedonic behavior. Seven days after MI, the S/W was reduced. This effect was no longer present 37days after the infarction and was also absent in the SO rats. Exposure to CMS reduced the S/W in SO rats also. In the CMS-exposed MI rats, the S/W was similar to that in the CMS-exposed SO rats. ICV administration of V1RANT abolished reductions in the S/W in the CMS-exposed MI rats, however, it did not influence S/W in the SO rats exposed to CMS and in the MI and SO rats not exposed to CMS. We conclude that: (1) myocardial infarction and chronic stressing cause anhedonia, (2) myocardial infarction-induced anhedonia appears to be transient, (3) myocardial infarction does not potentiate CMS-induced anhedonia, and (4) CMS-induced anhedonia critically depends on the stimulation of the central V1 receptors.

The role of central oxytocin in the regulation of cardiovascular parameters under resting conditions and during acute stress was investigated in male normotensive Wistar-Kyoto (WKY; n = 40) and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR; n = 28). In Experiment 1, mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded in WKY and SHR rats at rest and after an air-jet stressor during intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusions of vehicle, oxytocin or oxytocin receptor (OTR) antagonist. In Experiment 2, the effects of vehicle, oxytocin and OTR antagonist were determined in WKY rats after prior administration of a V1a vasopressin receptor (V1aR) antagonist. Resting MABP and HR were not affected by any of the ICV infusions either in WKY or in SHR rats. In control experiments (vehicle), the pressor response to stress was significantly higher in SHR. Oxytocin enhanced the pressor response to stress in the WKY rats but reduced it in SHR. During V1aR blockade, oxytocin infusion entirely abolished the pressor response to stress in WKY rats. Combined blockade of V1aR and OTR elicited a significantly greater MABP response to stress than infusion of V1a antagonist and vehicle. This study reveals significant differences in the regulation of blood pressure in WKY and SHR rats during alarming stress. Specifically, the augmentation of the pressor response to stress by exogenous oxytocin in WKY rats is caused by its interaction with V1aR, and endogenous oxytocin regulates the magnitude of the pressor response to stress in WKY rats by simultaneous interaction with OTR and V1aR.

Vasopressin V1a receptors (V1aR) were found in the cerebellum but their functional role has not been determined. As V1aR are engaged in the central regulation of the cardiovascular system and anxiogenic behavior and their role increases in the heart failure and stress, we decided to find out whether expression of V1aR is altered after myocardial infarction and chronic stressing. RT-PCR and Western blot analysis were performed to determine V1aR mRNA and protein expression in the cerebellum of four groups of rats (control sham-operated, infarcted, chronically stressed and infarcted chronically stressed). The myocardial infarct was produced by left coronary artery ligation, and chronic stressing by exposing the rat for four weeks to different types of mild stressors. The rats were sacrificed four weeks after the myocardial surgery or sham operation. Expressions of V1aR mRNA and protein were significantly lower in the infarcted and infarcted chronically stressed rats than in the sham-operated controls and chronically stressed not infarcted rats. No significant differences were found between the sham-operated controls and chronically stressed rats and between the infarcted rats and infarcted rats exposed to chronic stressing. It is concluded that V1aR mRNA and protein expressions are significantly down-regulated in the rats with the post-infarct heart failure but they are not affected by mild chronic stressing.

Background Angiotensin II (Ang II) plays a pivotal role in regulation of the circulatory system. Activation of angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptors in several brain regions leads to an increase in blood pressure. Accumulating data suggest that statins affect the peripheral action of Ang II; however, their central effects are poorly recognized. The study was aimed to determine whether simvastatin interferes with the brain angiotensin system in rats. Methods Twelve-week-old, Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into two groups. Untreated group was maintained on tap water, whereas simvastatin group received water containing simvastatin for the following 12 weeks. Later, both groups were subjected to experiments in which mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded during baseline conditions and after intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion of either saline, Ang II, or losartan. Results ICV infusion of Ang II elicited a significant increase in MABP in both groups. However, the pressor response in the simvastatin group was significantly smaller than that in the untreated group. There was no significant change in MABP after ICV infusion of saline or losartan. ICV infusion of Ang II elicited a significant increase in HR in the untreated group but not in the simvastatin group. There was no significant change in HR after ICV infusion of saline or losartan. Conclusions The results show that simvastatin reduces the pressor response to ICV-infused Ang II in rats. This implies that statins may affect the central regulation of the circulatory system, especially when the brain angiotensin system is stimulated.

The purpose of the present study was to elucidate if rats with myocardial infarction manifest altered responsiveness to central cardiovascular effects of low doses of angiotensin II (ANG II), and if ANG II and vasopressin (VP) cooperate in the central regulation of cardiovascular functions at rest and during stress. Conscious Sprague-Dawley rats with myocardial infarction induced by left coronary artery ligation, or sham-ligated (SL) controls were infused intracerebroventricularly with artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF), ANG II, ANG II + VP or ANG II + V1a receptor antagonist (V1ANT) 4 weeks after cardiac surgery. In the infarcted but not in the SL rats, the resting mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) was significantly elevated by infusions of ANG II and ANG II + VP, while infusion of ANG II + V1ANT was not effective. During administration of aCSF, the pressor, and tachycardic responses to an air-jet stressor were significantly greater in the infarcted than in the SL rats. In the SL rats, the pressor responses to the stressor were significantly greater during infusions of ANG II, ANG II + VP and ANG II + V1ANT than during infusion of aCSF. The tachycardic response in the SL rats was enhanced only by the combined infusion of ANG II + VP. In the infarcted rats, the pressor and the tachycardic responses to the stressor were similar in all groups. It is concluded that: (1) under resting conditions the infarcted rats manifest sensitisation to the central pressor effect of ANG II and that this effect depends on concomitant stimulation of V1a VP receptors, (2) central ANG II may enhance the pressor response to an alarming stressor in the SL rats through an action which does not depend on the concomitant stimulation of V1a receptors, (3) the cooperative action of ANG II and VP is required for intensification of the tachycardic response to the alarming stressor in the SL rats and (4) exaggeration of the cardiovascular responses to the alarming stressor in the infarcted rats cannot be further augmented by an additional stimulation of central ANG II receptors or combined stimulation of ANG II and VP receptors.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of the study was to determine whether exposure to chronic mild stress (CMS) affects expression of angiotensin II Type 1a receptor (AT1aR) messenger RNA (mRNA) in the brain and kidney. METHODS Male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into an unchallenged control group, which remained at rest, and an experimental group, exposed to CMS produced by a series of unexpected, disturbing stimuli applied at random over a period of 4 weeks. After sacrificing the animals, samples of the septal/accumbal and hypothalamic/thalamic diencephalon, brain medulla, cerebellum, and the renal medulla were harvested for determination of AT1aR mRNA. RESULTS Expression of AT1a receptor mRNA was significantly greater in the rats in the CMS condition than in the controls (septal/accumbal diencephalon: 1.689 [0.205] versus 0.027 [0.004], hypothalamic/thalamic diencephalon: 1.239 [0.101] versus 0.003 [0.001], brain medulla: 2.694 [0.295] versus 0.028 [0.003], cerebellum: 0.013 [0.002] versus 0.005 [0.001; p < .001 for all comparisons], and renal medulla: 409.92 [46.92] versus 208.06 [30.56; p < .01]). There was a significant positive correlation between AT1a mRNA expression in the septal/accumbal diencephalon and brain medulla (p < .025). CONCLUSIONS The results provide evidence that CMS significantly enhances expression of the AT1aR gene in the brain and kidney and indicate that changes in expression of AT1aR mRNA in different brain regions during CMS may be causally related. It is suggested that the up-regulation of AT1a receptors by chronic stress may potentiate negative effects of angiotensin II in pathologies associated with activation of the renin-angiotensin system.

The objective of the present study was to find out whether brain vasopressin (AVP) and angiotensin II (Ang II) are involved in pressor response to intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion of interleukin-1 beta (IL-1beta). The experiments were performed on conscious, 12- to 14-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded continuously under baseline conditions and during ICV infusion periods. In the first part of the study, the rats were ICV-infused with one of the following: 0.9% NaCl saline (5 microl/h-control), IL-1beta (100 ng/h), angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist (losartan 10 microg/h), IL-1beta together with losartan, V1 receptors antagonist (V1ANT), d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2,Ala-NH2(9)]AVP, 400 ng/h) or IL-1beta together with V1ANT. Saline infusion did not influence MAP, while administration of IL-1beta elicited a significant but transient increase in MAP. The pressor response to IL-1beta was abolished by losartan but not by V1ANT. On the other hand, combined administration of IL-1beta and V1ANT resulted in increase in HR, which was absent during infusion of IL-1beta alone. In the second part of the study after ICV pretreatment with IL-1beta or 0.9% NaCl (control), the rats received ICV infusion of one of the following: 0.9% NaCl saline, subpressor dose of Ang II (5 ng/15 s) or subpressor dose of AVP (5 ng/15 s). Subpressor doses of Ang II and AVP did not influence MAP and HR in saline-pretreated rats. The same dose of Ang II but not AVP applied in IL-1beta-pretreated rats resulted in a significant increase in MAP. The study provides evidence that IL-1beta through its action in the brain increases sensitivity to central pressor action of Ang II. Additionally, we found that AVP and in particular V1 receptors do not play important role in the central pressor action of IL-1beta, however, they may influence its effect on HR regulation.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of intraventricular administration of recombinant rat interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) on regulation of resting blood pressure and heart rate and to test the hypothesis that the brain angiotensinergic system is involved in regulation of hemodynamic parameters by centrally applied IL-1beta. The experiments were performed on Sprague Dawley rats, assigned to three series of experiments. In series 1 (control, n = 6), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded for 15 min under baseline conditions. This was followed by infusion of saline (0.9% sterile NaCl 5 microL/h) into the left cerebral ventricle (LCV). Measurements were continued during the next 60 min. In series 2 (n = 6) and 3 (n = 6) the experimental design was similar, except that in series 2 the animals were LCV infused with saline containing IL-1beta (100 ng/h) and in series 3 with saline containing IL-1beta (100 ng/h) and angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptors antagonist (Losartan, 10 microg/h). LCV infusion of saline alone did not influence MAP and HR while administration of IL-1beta elicited significant increase in MAP, but not in HR. The pressor effect was absent during combined infusion of IL-1beta and Losartan. Results of the study provide evidence that centrally administered IL-1beta exerts pressor effect, and reveal that this effect is mediated by stimulation of the brain angiotensin system and requires activation of AT1 receptors.

Stress is one of the factors provoking cardiovascular complications. The purpose of the study was to explore the role of vasopressin (VP) in central control of arterial blood pressure and heart rate under resting conditions and during stimulation by an alarming stress (air jet stress) in myocardial infarct-induced cardiac failure. Six groups of male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were subjected either to sham surgery (sham rats) or to ligation of a left coronary artery (infarcted rats). After 5 weeks both infarcted and sham rats were subjected either to intracerebroventricular infusion of artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) (sham aCSF and infarcted aCSF), [Arg8]-VP (sham VP and infarcted VP) or VP V1a receptor antagonist (d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2Ala-]VP, sham V1ANT and infarcted V1ANT). Air jet stress elicited significantly greater increases in mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) and heart rate in the infarcted aCSF than in the sham aCSF rats. Intracerebroventricular infusion of V1ANT significantly reduced resting MABP and MABP and heart rate increases in response to stress in the infarcted but not in the sham rats. Intracerebroventricular infusion of VP elicited a significant increase in resting MABP in the infarcted VP but not in the sham VP rats. The results provide evidence for enhanced engagement of the brain V1 VP receptors in regulation of resting MABP and in generation of exaggerated cardiovascular responses to air jet stress during the post-infarct state.

Accumulating evidence suggests that the brain renin-angiotensin system and proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, play a key role in the neurohormonal activation in chronic heart failure (HF). In this study we tested the involvement of TNF-α and angiotensin type 1 receptors (AT1Rs) in the central control of the cardiovascular system in HF rats. Methods: we carried out the study on male Sprague–Dawley rats subjected to the left coronary artery ligation (HF rats) or to sham surgery (sham-operated rats). The rats were pretreated for four weeks with intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion of either saline (0.25 μl/h) or TNF-α inhibitor etanercept (0.25 μg/0.25 μl/h). At the end of the pretreatment period, we measured mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) and heart rate (HR) at baseline and during 60 min of ICV administration of either saline (5 μl/h) or AT1Rs antagonist losartan (10 μg/5 μl/h). After the experiments, we measured the left ventricle end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and the size of myocardial scar. Results: MABP and HR of sham-operated and HF rats were not affected by pretreatments with etanercept or saline alone. In sham-operated rats the ICV infusion of losartan did not affect MABP either in saline or in etanercept pretreated rats. In contrast, in HF rats the ICV infusion of losartan significantly decreased MABP in rats pretreated with saline, but not in those pretreated with etanercept. LVEDP was significantly elevated in HF rats but not in sham-operated ones. Surface of the infarct scar exceeded 30% of the left ventricle in HF groups, whereas sham-operated rats did not manifest evidence of cardiac scarring. Conclusions: our study provides evidence that in rats with post-infarction heart failure the regulation of blood pressure by AT1Rs depends on centrally acting endogenous TNF-α.

Summary Central application of apelin elevates blood pressure and influences neuroendocrine responses to stress and food consumption. However, it is not known whether the central cardiovascular effects of apelin depend also on caloric intake or chronic stress. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effects of intracerebroventricular administration of apelin on blood pressure (mean arterial blood pressure) and heart rate in conscious Sprague–Dawley rats consuming either a normal-fat diet (NFD) or high-fat diet (HFD) for 12 weeks. During the last 4 weeks of the food regime, the rats were exposed (NFDS and HFDS groups) or not exposed (NFDNS and HFDNS groups) to chronic stress. Each group was divided into two subgroups receiving intracerebroventricular infusions of either vehicle or apelin. Apelin elicited significant increase of mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate in the NFDNS rats. This effect was abolished in the HFDNS, HFDS and NFDS groups. HFD resulted in a significant elevation of blood concentrations of total cholesterol, triglycerides glucose and insulin. Chronic stress reduced plasma concentration of total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and increased plasma corticosterone concentration and APJ receptor mRNA expression in the hypothalamus, whereas a combination of a HFD with chronic stress resulted in the elevation of plasma triglycerides, total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and in increased plasma corticosterone concentration, apelin concentration and APJ receptor mRNA expression in the hypothalamus. It is concluded that a HFD and chronic stress result in significant suppression of the central pressor action of apelin, and cause significant though not unidirectional changes of metabolic and endocrine parameters.

Previous studies provided evidence for an interaction between the brain nitrergic and vasopressinergic systems in normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats in regulation of the cardiovascular functions. The present study was designed to determine the role of the brain nitric oxide (NO) in regulation of basal blood pressure and its interaction with vasopressin (AVP) in rats with renin dependent transgenic hypertension TGRmRen2(27) (TGR). The experiments were performed on conscious hypertensive TGR and normotensive Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats. Both groups were chronically instrumented with the left cerebral ventricle cannula (LCV) and femoral arterial catheter. LCV application of 2.3 nmol (0.5 μg) of N G -nitro- l -arginine ( l -NNA) an inhibitor of NO synthesis significantly elevated blood pressure (MAP) in TGR but not in SD rats. In contrast administration of NO donor S -acetyl- N -penicillamine (SNAP) produced significant decrease of MAP only in SD rats. LCV application of AVP (10 ng) elicited comparable increases of MAP in TGR and SD rats. Pretreatment with l -NNA significantly potentiated pressor response to AVP in TGR rats but not in SD rats. The results provide evidence that increased production of intrabrain NO may play a significant blood pressure buffering role in TGR rats both under baseline conditions and during activation of the vasopressinergic system.

Numerous studies suggest that apelin plays a significant role in cardiovascular regulation and in the pathogenesis of hypertension. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether apelin-13 (AP-13) is involved in the regulation of cardiovascular responses to acute stress in spontaneous hypertension.The effects of intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration of AP-13 on changes in mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) and heart rate evoked by an alarming stress (air jet stress) were compared in awake normotensive Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). The rats were divided into four groups: Groups 1 (WKY) and 3 (SHR) received ICV infusion of 0.9% sodium chloride (vehicle), whereas Groups 2 (WKY) and 4 (SHR) were ICV infused with AP-13. All animals were exposed to the alarming stress.During the ICV administration of the vehicle, the pressor response to stress was significantly greater in SHR than in WKY. The ICV infusion of AP-13 reduced the pressor response evoked by the application of the stressor in SHR but not in WKY. It also abolished the difference in stress-induced MABP increases between WKY and SHR.The results show that centrally acting apelin may play an essential role in the regulation of blood pressure responses to an alarming stress in SHR rats.

There are solid grounds for the recognition of the involvement of multiple neuronal/neurotransmitter networks in the regulation of the cardiovascular system. Clinical and preclinical studies provide evidence that heart failure is associated with significant changes in the central control of some of these systems. In addition, it has been shown that some of the brain's neurochemical pathways, which are involved in the central control of blood pressure, play a role in the regulation of emotions and cognitive functions. Stress and depression are regarded as potential challenges for the cardiovascular system, causing inappropriate regulation of cardiovascular parameters and worsening the prognosis of heart failure. There is also evidence that heart failure increases sensitivity to stress and depression. Recently, knowledge of the neurochemical background of comorbidity of stress, depression and heart failure has increased markedly. Our studies and those of other authors provided evidence for significant role of the improper function of neuropeptides, and in particular of the angiotensinergic, vasopressinergic and oxytocinergic systems in the exaggerated responsiveness of the cardiovascular system to stress in heart failure and depression. Current evidence indicates that the inappropriate regulation of the release of these neuropeptides and/or expression of their receptors play a particularly important role in long-term changes of central cardiovascular control during post-infarct heart failure.

Previous studies showed that chronically stressed and myocardially infarcted rats respond with exaggerated cardiovascular responses to acute stress. The present experiments were designed to elucidate whether this effect can be abolished by treatment with the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor captopril. Sprague Dawley rats were subjected either to sham surgery (Groups 1 and 2) or to myocardial infarction (Groups 3 and 4). The rats of Groups 2 and 4 were also exposed to mild chronic stressing. Four weeks after the operation, mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) and heart rate (HR) were measured under resting conditions and after application of acute stress. The cardiovascular responses to the acute stress were determined again 24 h after administration of captopril orally. Captopril significantly reduced resting MABP in each group. Before administration of captopril, the maximum increases in MABP evoked by the acute stressor in all (infarcted and sham-operated) chronically stressed rats and also in the infarcted nonchronically stressed rats were significantly greater than in the sham-operated rats not exposed to chronic stressing. These differences were abolished by captopril. The results suggest that ACE may improve tolerance of acute stress in heart failure and during chronic stressing.

The aim of the present study was to find out whether brain nitroxidergic system may be involved in modulation of central cardiovascular effects of arginine vasopressin (AVP) in normotensive (WKY) rats and whether its regulatory effects are altered in spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) rats. Two series of experiments were performed on conscious WKY and SHR rats instrumented with the lateral cerebral ventricle (i.c.v.) cannula and with the femoral arterial catheters. In Series 1 (10 WKY, 7 SHR rats), i.c.v. application of 2.3 nmol (0.5 microg) of N(G)-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA), an inhibitor of NO synthesis, did not significantly affect baseline arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR). In WKY but not in SHR, i.c.v. administration of 5.8 nmol (1 microg) of L-arginine (L-ARG) elicited a small, significant decrease of MAP (P0.05) which could be reversed by i.c.v. pretreatment with L-NNA. In Series 2 (7 WKY, 8 SHR), administration of 10 pmol of AVP (10 ng) resulted in significant pressor effect in both strains; MAP increase being significantly greater in SHR than in WKY rats (P0.05). I.c.v. pretreatment with L-NNA significantly intensified the pressor response to centrally applied AVP both in WKY (P0.01) and in SHR (P0.01) rats; the maximum increase of blood pressure to combined administration of L-NNA and AVP being significantly greater in SHR than in WKY rats. The results indicate existence of an interaction between the central vasopressinergic and nitroxidergic system in blood pressure regulation. It is suggested that centrally released AVP increases availability of nitric oxide in the brain cardiovascular regions, whereas NO plays a compensatory role by reducing central pressor effect of AVP. Effectiveness of this compensatory mechanism is enhanced in the SHR rats.

Vasopressin released during myocardial infarction and in response to stress regulates blood pressure through multiple actions exerted in the brain, cardiovascular system and kidney. The aim of the present study was to determine whether myocardial infarction influences expression of vasopressin V1a receptor (V1aR) mRNA and protein in the brain and kidney and whether stress has an impact on expression of these parameters during the post-infarct state. Male, adult Sprague Dawley rats were subjected to myocardial infarction or sham surgery. Seven days later some rats were exposed to mild stress for 4weeks whereas other stayed at rest. Tissue fragments were harvested from four groups of rats (control, infarct, stress, infarct+stress). Expression of V1aR mRNA (Real time PCR) was determined in the preoptic, diencephalic, mesencephalopontine and medullary regions of the brain and in the renal cortex and medulla. Protein V1aR expression (Western blotting) was determined in the brain mesencephalopontine region and in the kidney medulla. In the preoptic, diencephalic, and mesencephalopontine regions, V1aR mRNA expression was significantly lower in the infarcted rats than in the sham-operated unstressed controls. The infarcted rats manifested also lower expression of V1aR protein in the mesencephalopontine region than the other groups. The stressed group demonstrated significantly higher V1aR mRNA expression in the brain medulla and in the renal cortex and renal medulla than the control group. In all brain regions and in the kidney, V1aR mRNA expression was significantly higher in the stressed rats than in the infarcted rats. The stressed rats showed also higher expression of V1aR protein in the renal medulla than the other groups. It is concluded that myocardial infarction and chronic stress cause significant but differential changes in the regulation of V1a receptors expression in the brain and the kidney.

It is now well recognized that systemically released angiotensin II (Ang II) and arginine vasopressin (AVP) act in concert in regulation of blood pressure and water-electrolyte balance. Numerous studies have also demonstrated that centrally applied Ang II and AVP cause significant alterations of the cardiovascular functions and body fluid balance. Moreover, it has been established that Ang II and AVP are released in the central nervous system during cardiovascular and osmotic disorders and that the cardiovascular regions of the brainstem and the osmoregulatory regions of the forebrain are extensively innervated by the angiotensinergic and vasopressinergic neurons. Some evidence indicates that the angiotensinergic and vasopressinergic system may interact in the central blood pressure control, although the significance of this interaction may differ in various species. Recently, attempts have been made to find out whether centrally released Ang II and AVP may play a role in the regulation of the cardiovascular system under physiological and pathophysiological conditions. With regard to this, the available evidence strongly suggests that the both systems may be involved in regulation of blood pressure under baseline conditions. In addition, the vasopressinergic system appears to be involved in the adjustment of cardiovascular functions to hypovolemia, whereas its role in regulation of blood pressure during the osmotic disorders is less clear. Regulation of blood pressure and heart rate by centrally released AVP under baseline conditions, during hypovolemia and in osmotic disorders is significantly altered in the spontaneously hypertensive rats. It is now well established that centrally applied Ang II and Ang III are potent dipsogenic compounds. There also is evidence that AVP may enhance the osmotic thirst. However, the physiological role of brain-derived AVP and Ang II in the control of water intake awaits further examination. The available evidence from rat studies does not give support to a significant cooperation between central angiotensinergic and vasopressinergic system in regulation of water intake.

The purpose of the present study was to compare influence of central arginine vasopressin (AVP) and of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) on control of arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) in normotensive (WKY) and spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) rats. Three series of experiments were performed on 30 WKY and 30 SHR, chronically instrumented with guide tubes in the lateral ventricle (LV) and arterial and venous catheters. MAP and HR were monitored before and after i.v. injections of either vehicle or 1, 10 and 50 ng of AVP and 25, 125 and 500 ng of ANP. Sensitivity of cardiac component of baroreflex (CCB), expressed as a slope of the regression line was determined from relationships between systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and HR period (HRp) during phenylephrine (Phe)-induced hypertension and sodium nitroprusside (SN)-induced hypotension. CCB was measured before and after administration of either vehicle, AVP, ANP, or both peptides together. Increases of MAP occurred after LV administration of 1, 10 and 50 ng of AVP in WKY and of 10 and 50 ng in SHR. ANP did not cause significant changes in MAP in both strains as compared to vehicle, but it abolished AVP-induced MAP increase in WKY and SHR. CCB was reduced in WKY and SHR after LV administration of AVP during SN-induced hypotension. In SHR but not in WKY administration of ANP, AVP and ANP + AVP decreased CCB during Phe-induced MAP elevation. The results indicate that centrally applied AVP and ANP exert differential effects on blood pressure and baroreflex control of heart rate in WKY and SHR and suggest interaction of these two peptides in blood pressure regulation at the level of central nervous system.

Neurogenic stress causes sudden acceleration of heart rate and elevation of arterial blood pressure. that may markedly increase the work load of the heart. Several recent clinical studies document significant role of stress in evoking sudden cardiovascular complications. It has been also shown that the cardiovascular responses to stress are significantly exaggerated during the post-infarct cardiac failure. This review emphasises important neuromodulatory role of some neuropeptides in regulation of the cardiovascular system during stress. A number of experimental data provide evidence that intensity of the cardiovascular responses to stress is regulated by neuropeptides. Vasopressin, angiotensin II and interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) appear to be responsible for exaggeration of the cardiovascular responses to stress whereas oxytocin seems to act in the opposite way. Recent studies performed in our Department provide evidence for differential involvement of angiotensin II AT(1), vasopressin V(1a), IL-1 and oxytocin receptors in regulation of the cardiovascular responses to the alarming stress. Current evidence suggests that the enhanced stimulation of central AT(1) and V(1) receptors as well as the attenuated stimulation of oxytocin receptors account for exaggeration of the cardiovascular responses to the sudden alarming stress during the post-infarct state. Growing number of data indicate that angiotensin II significantly interacts with vasopressin, interleukin-1 and TNF-alpha systems in the central cardiovascular control under resting conditions. Some of the neuropeptides interact also during stress.

The purpose of the present study was to establish the effect of chronic central interleukin-1 receptors blockade and central chronic infusion of interleukin-1 beta (IL-1beta) on cardiovascular response to an acute stressor. The experiments were performed on 12-14-week-old, male WKY rats, divided into three experimental groups. Each group was subjected to chronic intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion of one of the following compounds: saline (control, group C), recombinant rat IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-ANT group) or interleukin-1 beta (IL-1B group). After 5 days of the ICV infusions mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded continuously under baseline conditions and after the application of an air jet stressor. The stressor was applied three times with 10-min intervals. There were no significant differences in MABP and HR between groups under baseline conditions and immediately before the application of the three consecutive air jets. After the first stressor the IL-ANT group responded with a significantly lower increase in blood pressure than the control and IL-1B group. After the application of the two following air jets only the trend for an intergroup difference was present. The results of the present study provide further evidence that cytokines play an important role in the regulation of the circulatory system. The most important new finding is that the magnitude of the pressor response to the alarming stress is strongly influenced by IL-1 receptors in the brain.

Growing number of studies reveal that the brain neural network plays significant role in the short-term and long-term regulation of the cardiovascular functions. The neurons involved in the complex neurogenic control of the cardiovascular system use classical neurotransmitters and nonconventional mediators such as peptides (angiotensin II, vasopressin, natriuretic peptides, endothelins, opioids, cytokines), steroids, ouabain-like factors and gaseous compounds. Among them the neuropeptides form a group of substances arising significant interest. Thanks to wide distribution of peptidergic neurons in the central nervous system, location of peptide receptors on neurons and glial cells, versatile but frequently overlapping mechanisms of activation of the intracellular processes the neuropeptides play significant role in short-term and long-term regulation of excitability and remodeling of the neurons. In several instances they modulate effects of the classical transmitting systems involved in regulation blood pressure, heart rate, water-electrolyte balance, metabolism, stress, pain, mood and memory. Prolonged activation or inhibition of specific neuropeptide pathways frequently results in long-lasting disorders of several regulatory systems. In this review this is exemplified by overactivity of angiotensin II, vasopressin and cytokines in the brain during hypertension, heart failure and stress. Multifarious actions of angiotensin II and vasopressin, and their mutual interaction with cytokines make of these neuropeptides excellent candidates for the compounds responsible for long-term resetting of the central cardiovascular control, and forming a link between the cardiovascular diseases, stress and mood disorders.

The present study was designed to find out whether brain nitric oxide (NO) influences hemodynamic response to intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion of interleukin-1 beta (IL-1beta). Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded in seven series of experiments performed on conscious Sprague-Dawley rats receiving during 60 min ICV infusion of: 0.9% NaCl (5 microl/h; series 1), IL-1beta (100 ng/h; series 2), NO synthase inhibitor (L-NAME, 1mg/h; series 3), IL-1beta together with L-NAME (series 4), IL-1beta together with inactive isomer of NO synthase inhibitor (D-NAME, 1mg/h; series 5), NO donor (SNAP, 40 microg/h; series 6) and IL-1beta together with SNAP (series 7). ICV infusion of saline did not influence MAP while administration of IL-1beta as well as IL-1beta together with D-NAME elicited a significant, though transient, increase in MAP. In series 4, combined infusion of IL-1beta and L-NAME exerted an increase in MAP, which persisted until the end of the experiment and was significantly higher than in series 2 and 5. In series 7, infusion of SNAP together with IL-1beta abolished the pressor effect of IL-1beta. HR was not significantly altered in any of the experimental series. These results demonstrate that inhibition of NO synthesis in the brain enhances and prolongs the pressor response to IL-1beta, whereas concomitant administration of NO donor abolishes the hemodynamic effect of IL-1beta. Therefore, we conclude that NO generated in the brain is involved in buffering the pressor response to IL-1beta.

Objective Renin transgenic hypertensive rats [TGR(mRen2)27] have increased contents of angiotensin II and arginine vasopressin (AVP) in the cardiovascular brain regions. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of centrally released AVP on the regulation of baseline blood pressure in TGR(mRen2)27 rats and to determine the interaction between AVP and angiotensin II in the central control of blood pressure in this model of hypertension. Design Three basic series of experiments were performed on 20 TGR(mRen2)27 and 20 Hannover Sprague-Dawley conscious rats, chronically instrumented with lateral cerebral ventricle (LCV) cannulae and femoral artery catheters. In series 1, blood pressure and heart rate were recorded during an LCV infusion of artificial cerebrospinal fluid before and after LCV administration of angiotensin II. In series 2, the effects of an LCV administration of angiotensin II (100 ng) on mean arterial pressure and the heart rate were determined during LCV infusion of a selective AVP receptor (V 1 ) antagonist (1 -(1-mercapto-4-methylcyclohexaneacetic acid)-8-arginine vasopressin (MeCAAVP) and d(CH 2 ) 5 [Tyr(Me) 2 ,Ala-NH 2 9 ]AVP or a selective angiotensin II type 1 (AT,) receptor antagonist (losartan) or both. In series 3, mean arterial pressure and the heart rate were determined after an LCV injection of either AVP (10 ng) or AVP together with angiotensin II. Results The LCV infusions of antagonists to V 1 and AT 1 receptors caused significant comparable decreases in baseline MAP in TGR(mRen2)27 but not in Sprague-Dawley rats. Angiotensin II elicited significant pressor responses, both in TGR(mRen2)27 and in Sprague-Dawley rats. Blockade of V 1 receptors significantly reduced the duration and the maximum amplitude of the central pressor response to angiotensin II in TGR(mRen2)27 rats, whereas in Sprague-Dawley rats the maximum pressor effect was not significantly altered. In both strains, the pressor response to angiotensin II was abolished by blockade of AT 1 receptors. Conclusions The results indicate that the elevated blood pressure in TGR(mRen2)27 rats is partly caused by increased function of the brain angiotensinergic AT 1 and vasopressinergic V, systems. Centrally released AVP is involved in mediation of the pressor effect exerted by centrally applied angiotensin II in TGR(mRen2)27 rats.

The present study was designed to determine the role of centrally released arginine vasopressin (AVP) in cardiovascular adaptation to hypotensive hypovolemia in conscious normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY) and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Three groups of experiments were performed on WKY and SHR chronically implanted with lateral cerebral ventricle (LCV) cannulas and with femoral artery catheters. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were monitored before and after arterial bleeding (1.3% body weight) performed during LCV infusion 1) artificial cerebrospinal fluid (control), 2) V1 AVP-receptor antagonists inverted question mark[d(Et2)Tyr(Me)]DAVP, 5 ng/min inverted question mark, and 3) V2 AVP-receptor antagonists inverted question mark[d(CH2)5-D-Ile2, Ile4, AlaNH2]AVP, 5 ng/min inverted question mark. In control experiments hemorrhage caused similar significant decreases of MAP in both strains and bradycardia in WKY. Blockade of central V1 AVP receptors abolished hemorrhagic bradycardia and significantly reduced hypotension in WKY, with no effect on HR and MAP responses to hypovolemia in SHR. Neither in WKY nor in SHR were the cardiovascular responses to hemorrhage altered by blockade of central V2 receptors. The results suggest that the central V1 AVP system plays a significant role in eliciting hypovolemic bradycardia and hypotension in WKY and that this function is significantly impaired in SHR.

To determine central cardiovascular effects of arginine vasopressin (AVP) in the dog, and the nature of the receptors involved, blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) responses were monitored in 18 conscious dogs subjected to third ventricle (i.c.v.) infusions of either AVP or AVP analogs with agonistic or antagonistic properties towards V1, V2 and putative ‘V3’ receptors. Significant blood pressure (BP) icreases were elicited by i.c.v. infusions of: (i) AVP at a rate of 0.01, 1 and 100 ng/min; (ii) the selective V1 agonist (F180, Ferring) at a rate of 1 and 100 ng/min, and (iii) the selective V1 antagonist, dEt2 Tyr(Me)DAVP at a rate of 100 ng and 400 ng/min. Pretreatmetn with anothe selective V1 antagonist (MeCAAVP) increased baseline BP and prevented AVP induced BP increase. Blood pressure was not altered by i.c.v. infusions of the selective V2 agonist dVDAVP, the selective V2 antagonist d(CH2)5[ d -Ile2,Abu4]AVP, the putative ‘V3’ agonist agonist vasopressin-(4–8) (Akzo Organon), mediating behavioral actions of AVP and by artificial CSF. Heart rate was significantly accelerated by AVP infused at a rate of 100 3g/min. The results reveal high sensitivity of teh conscious dog to centralpresor action of AVP and indicate that this effect is mediated by V1-like receptors. It is suggested that the pressor of the V1 antagonist may result from its partial agonistic properties towards central V1 receptors, however, it can not be excluded that endogenous AVP released under baseline conditions may exert tonic hypotensive effect mediated by a different population of V1 receptors, this effect being abolished by V1 antagonist. The results do not support involvement of V2 or ‘V3’ receptors in central cardiovascular actions of AVP.

The effects of arginine vasopressin analogs with V2 agonistic and antagonistic properties on blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were compared in conscious, spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) and normotensive (WKY) rats under resting conditions and after administration of phenylephrine (Phe) and sodium nitroprusside (SN). In WKY rats, resting BP and HR were not significantly affected during intravenous (i.v.) infusion of dVDAVP, (V2 agonist; 200 pg/kg/min), d(CH2)5 (D-Ile2,Abu4]AVP (V2 antagonist 1; weak V1 antagonist; V2/V1 ratio = 29; 0.6 microgram/kg/min), d(CH2)5[D-Ile2,Ile4,AlaNH2]AVP (V2 antagonist 2; very weak V1 antagonist; V2/V1 ratio = 83; 0.6 microgram/kg/min) and combined infusion of V2 agonist and V2 antagonist 2. Under resting conditions BP and HR were not affected in WKY by any of the treatments. In SHR rats BP and HR were significantly decreased by V2 antagonist 2 infused alone or in combination with V2 agonist. In WKY but not in SHR V2 agonist without and with prior V2 receptors blockade significantly augmented bradycardia associated with a maximum increase of the systolic blood pressure after Phe administration. Significant differences were found between SHR and WKY in SN-induced changes of HR and BP after administration of V2 agonist and antagonists. The results suggest that circulating vasopressin may modify the baroreflex by interaction with receptors which are stimulated by V2 agonist but are different from the classical V2 receptors. The study supports evidence for differential effects of vasopressin analogs on blood pressure and blood pressure-heart rate relations in WKY and SHR.

The present study was aimed at determining the role of centrally released oxytocin in regulation of blood pressure and heart rate (HR) under resting conditions and during an acute air-jet stress in rats with a myocardial infarction and controls infarcted. Four weeks after ligation of a coronary artery or sham surgery, conscious Sprague Dawley rats were subjected to one of the following intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusions: (1) 0.9% NaCl (control), (2) oxytocin, (3) oxytocin receptor antagonist {desGly-NH(2)-d(CH(2))(5)[D-Tyr(2)Thr(4)]OVT}(OXYANT). Resting arterial blood pressure and HR were not affected by any of the ICV infusions either in the infarcted or sham-operated rats. In the control experiments, the pressor and tachycardic responses to the air jet of infarcted rats were significantly greater than in the sham-operated rats. OXYANT significantly enhanced the cardiovascular responses to stress only in the sham-operated rats whereas oxytocin significantly attenuated both responses in the infarcted but not in the sham-operated rats. The results suggest that centrally released endogenous oxytocin significantly reduces the cardiovascular responses to the acute stressor in control rats. This buffering function of the brain-oxytocin system is not efficient during the post-myocardial infarction state, however it may be restored by central administration of exogenous oxytocin.