Search

Background and Purpose: Toll‐like receptors 4 (TLR4) and TLR7/TLR8 play an important role in mediating the inflammatory effects of bacterial and viral pathogens. Interleukin‐1 receptor‐associated kinase 4 (IRAK4) is an important regulator of signalling by toll‐like receptor (TLR) and hence is a potential therapeutic target in diseases characterized by increased lung inflammatory signalling. Experimental Approach: We used an established murine model of acute lung inflammation, and studied human lung tissue ex vivo, to investigate the effects of inhibiting IRAK4 on lung inflammatory pathways. Key Results: We show that TLR4 stimulation produces an inflammatory response characterized by neutrophil influx and tumour necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α) production in murine lungs and that these responses are markedly reduced in IRAK4 kinase‐dead mice. In addition, we characterize a novel selective IRAK4 inhibitor, BI1543673, and show that this compound can reduce lipopolysaccharide (LPS)‐induced airway inflammation in wild‐type mice. Additionally, BI1543673 reduced inflammatory responses to both TLR4 and TLR7/8 stimulation in human lung tissue studied ex vivo. Conclusion and Implications: These data demonstrate a key role for IRAK4 signalling in lung inflammation and suggest that IRAK4 inhibition has potential utility to treat lung diseases characterized by inflammatory responses driven through TLR4 and TLR7/8. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Over the last few decades, the efficacy of biological therapies for COPD has been evaluated by different randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Still, the evaluation of real-world data and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have not been performed in this field before. In the current work, we present a systematic literature review of the real-world data and PROMs of biological treatments for COPD. Methods: Three large databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect) were utilized for the systematic literature review. Clinical studies (RCT, cohorts, case series/reports) assessing patients with COPD treated by any biological therapy were included. Results: The review resulted in twelve eligible studies (nine randomized controlled trials and three "real-world" case series/reports). The evaluation of PROMs in the included studies was mainly limited to the severity and burden of respiratory symptoms. Most biological therapies were associated with improved PROMs compared to the baseline, although not for the placebo. Dupilumab was the only biologic therapy with proven efficacy in RCT for both objective and subjective measures. One prior study reported patients' self-perceived drug effects, and none evaluated patients' perceived disease status. Only 25 patients were assessed in a real-world setting for all biologic therapies combined. Real-world data were retrospective in the form of case reports or series. Conclusions: There are limited data on patients' experience with biological therapies for COPD. While real-world data and PROMs are missing, biases such as a placebo effect must be considered, requiring their incorporation with objective outcomes from prospective controlled trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To characterize the register of a secondary diagnosis of mental illnesses in all chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) hospitalizations registered in Portugal from 2008 to 2015 and explore their impact on hospitalization outcomes. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted. Hospitalizations of patients with at least 40 years old, discharged between 2008 and 2015 with a primary diagnosis of COPD (ICD-9-CM codes 491.x, 492.x and 496) were retrieved from a national administrative database. Comorbid psychiatric diagnoses were identified and defined by the HCUP Clinical Classification Software (CCS) category codes 650–670 (excluding 662). Length of hospital stay (LoS), admission type, in-hospital mortality, and estimated hospital charges were analyzed according to psychiatric diagnostic categories using sex and age-adjusted models. Results: Of 66,661 COPD hospitalizations, 25,869 (38.8%) were episodes with a registered psychiatric comorbidity. These were more likely to correspond to younger inpatients (OR = 2.16, 95%CI 2.09–2.23; p < 0.001), to stay longer at the hospital (aOR = 1.08, 95%CI 1.05–1.12; p < 0.001), to incur in higher estimated hospital charges (aOR = 1.37, 95%CI 1.33–1.42; p < 0.001) and to be urgently admitted (aOR = 1.33, 95%CI 1.23–1.44; p < 0.001). After adjustment for age, in-hospital mortality was lower for episodes with psychiatric diagnoses (aOR = 0.90; 95%CI 0.84–0.96; p < 0.001), except for organic and neurodegenerative diseases category and developmental disorders, intellectual disabilities and disorders usually diagnosed in infancy, childhood, or adolescence category. Discussion: These findings corroborate the additional burden placed by psychiatric disorders on COPD hospitalizations, highlighting the importance of individualizing care to address these comorbidities and minimize their impact on treatment outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: Uncontrolled asthma in patients treated for mild/moderate disease could be caused by non‐pulmonary treatable traits (TTs) that affect asthma control negatively. We aimed to identify demographic characteristics, behavioural (smoking) and extrapulmonary (obesity, comorbidities) TTs and the risk for future exacerbations among patients with uncontrolled asthma prescribed step 1–3 treatment according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). Methods: Twenty‐eight thousand five hundred eighty‐four asthma patients (≥18 y) with a registration in the Swedish National Airway Register between 2017 and 2019 were included (index‐date). The database was linked to other national registers to obtain information on prescribed drugs 2‐years pre‐index and exacerbations 1‐year post‐index. Asthma treatment was classified into step 1–3 or 4–5, and uncontrolled asthma was defined based on symptom control, exacerbations and lung function. Results: GINA step 1–3 included 17,318 patients, of which 9586 (55%) were uncontrolled (UCA 1–3). In adjusted analyses, UCA 1–3 was associated with female sex (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.27–1.41), older age (1.00, 1.00–1.00), primary education (1.30, 1.20–1.40) and secondary education (1.19, 1.12–1.26), and TTs such as smoking (1.25, 1.15–1.36), obesity (1.23, 1.15–1.32), cardiovascular disease (1.12, 1.06–1.20) and depression/anxiety (1.13, 1.06–1.21). Furthermore, UCA 1–3 was associated with future exacerbations; oral corticosteroids (1.90, 1.74–2.09) and asthma hospitalization (2.55, 2.17–3.00), respectively, also when adjusted for treatment step 4–5. Conclusion: Over 50% of patients treated for mild/moderate asthma had an uncontrolled disease. Assessing and managing of TTs such as smoking, obesity and comorbidities should be conducted in a holistic manner, as these patients have an increased risk for future exacerbations. Uncontrolled asthma in patients treated for mild to moderate disease is associated with treatable traits such as smoking, obesity and comorbidities. Moreover, these patients have an increased risk for future exacerbations. These findings highlight the importance of assessing and managing treatable traits in asthma, in a holistic manner. See relatededitorial [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article summarises key themes from a symposium held during the recent European Respiratory Society congress, which took place in Vienna, Austria, 7–11 September 2024. The symposium was sponsored by GSK and entitled 'Striving for disease stability in COPD: Giving patients more of their best days'. During the session, the speakers (MeiLan Han, Lowie Vanfleteren and Dave Singh) highlighted the specific challenges of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), such as its unpredictable and unstable nature, with additional insights provided from patients with COPD in the form of video interviews. The faculty discussed whether treatment standards and goals should be more ambitious to provide all patients the stability and predictability they deserve and the opportunity to do more while living with COPD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype may be eligible for additional treatment options to improve disease control; however, the prevalence and frequency of eosinophil testing is unknown. This study assessed blood eosinophil count testing prevalence in patients with asthma by exacerbation frequency and healthcare provider (HCP) type. Methods: This was a retrospective, longitudinal, real-world study (GSK ID: 214470) utilizing the Merative Explorys® Universe electronic health records database. Eligible patients had ≥ 2 asthma diagnostic codes (January 2016–December 2018) (Index date: first asthma diagnosis). Outcomes included patient demographics and clinical characteristics (12 months pre-index [baseline]), and prevalence of blood eosinophil count testing, stratified by exacerbation frequency (infrequent exacerbations [< 2]) or frequent exacerbations [≥ 2] or primary HCP (Allergist/Pulmonologist, a primary care physician [PCP] or other HCP) during the 12 months post-index (follow-up). Results: Of 400,254 patients included (mean age: 51.2 years; 70.8% female), the most common provider type at baseline was a PCP (76.8%). A higher proportion of patients with frequent exacerbations had blood eosinophil count tests at baseline (55.4–69.5%) and follow-up (67.9–75.1%), compared with patients with infrequent exacerbations (55.5–63.7%, 62.4–67.3%). Significantly more patients in the Allergist/Pulmonologist subgroup had ≥ 1 blood eosinophil count test result compared with patients in the PCP subgroup at both baseline (59.9% vs. 50.7%; p < 0.001) and follow-up (59.0% vs. 56.2%; p < 0.001). In the total population, the mean (SD) number of tests ordered was 3.4 (5.3) and 4.1 (6.4) during the baseline and follow-up periods, respectively. A greater mean number of tests were ordered for patients with frequent exacerbations, most apparently in the Allergist/Pulmonologist subgroup during baseline and follow-up (7.4 vs. 4.9). For patients with frequent exacerbations and blood eosinophil count test results, the mean (SD) number of tests ranged from 3.1 (4.6) to 5.8 (8.3) at baseline and 5.1 (8.5) to 7.4 (10.6) during follow-up. Conclusions: The prevalence of blood eosinophil count testing in patients with asthma remains suboptimal. Routine blood eosinophil count testing should be considered by HCPs for patients with asthma to increase identification of the eosinophilic asthma phenotype, which may inform the decision to advance to targeted biologic therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We aimed to study the impact of biological therapies in Saudi Arabia on patients with severe asthma (SA) combined with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in terms of clinical outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective observational cohort research that was undertaken at the severe asthma clinics of the Armed Forces Hospital of the Southern Region (AFHSR) and King Khalid University Hospital, Abha, from March to September 2022 to delineate the effects of 3 biological therapies (dupilumab, benralizumab, and omalizumab) in adults with SA and concomitant CRS. Clinical outcomes assessed included asthma exacerbation frequency, hospitalization rates, use of oral corticosteroids (OCs), and the asthma control test (ACT) scores before and 1 year after biological therapies. Results: Eighty patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 46.68. There were 45 (56%) females and 35 (44%) males. There was a notifiable decrease in the frequency of exacerbations and hospitalization and in the number of patients who received OCs after 6 and 12 months of biological therapies compared to pre-biological therapies, respectively (p < 0.001 each), while there was a significant increase in the ACT scores at 6 and 12 months post-biological therapies, compared to pre-biological therapies, respectively (p < 0.001). These significant differences were maintained with all the 3 biologics used. Conclusions: Results from the first study from two large Saudi Arabian tertiary centers for patients with SA and CRS agree with and support those of worldwide real-life ones. One-year follow-up showed the effectiveness of the 3 drugs in terms of reduced frequency of asthma hospitalizations and exacerbations, the use of OCs, and improved ACT scores. Further prospective multicenter studies are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Today, single-inhaler ICS/LAMA/LABA (SITT) COPD therapies are available. It is unclear whether they are more effective than multiple-device triple therapies (MITT) in improving COPD outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively considered patients on SITT/MITT in 2019/2020 who were prescribed >7 packages of ICS/LABA/LAMA or ICS/LAMA (+LAMA). The two treatments were compared concerning systemic corticosteroids, antibiotics, salbutamol, antifungal prescriptions, and number of emergency room visits/hospitalizations (ERV/Hs). We studied 292 MITT patients (Group A) during 2019, switching to SITT in 2020, and 366 subjects (Group B) who took SITT during 2019, and 206 MITT individuals (Group C) in 2020. Results: ICS/LABA + LAMA (MITT) package use was 8.2 ± 4.2 and 7.85 ± 4 in 2019, switching to 11.2 ± 3.2 when patients shifted to SITT in 2020 (p = 0.0001). Group A MITT package use was lower than in SITT patients in 2019 (9.31 ± 2.71, p = 0.0001; Group B). Throughout 2020, Group C (10.3 ± 6.1 packs) adherence to ICS/LABA was similar to SITT adherence in Group A (p = 0.270), whereas LAMA package use (9.1 ± 5) was lower (p = 0.0038). Patients using systemic corticosteroids/antibiotics were fewer in SITT in 2020, compared to the MITT results in 2019. Subjects with fewer ERV/Hs were observed with SITT rather than with MITT. Particularly, 13.8% of patients needed ≥2 ERV/Hs when treated with SITT, whereas 19.2% needed ≥2 ERV/Hs with MITT in 2019 (p = 0.08). Multivariate analysis, adjusted for all confounding factors including treatment adherence, showed that MITT (vs. SITT) can have an increased risk of at least one ERV/H (subjects receiving MITT during 2019 passing to SITT in 2020, OR: 1.718 [1.010–2.924], p = 0.046; Group A/MITT/2019 vs. Group B/SITT/2019, OR: 1.650 [0.973–3.153], p = 0.056; Group C/MITT/2020 vs. Group B/SITT/2019, OR: 1.908 [1.018–3.577], p = 0.044). Conclusions: SITT therapy may promote treatment adherence more effectively, therefore, reducing COPD exacerbations better than MITT. A possible synergistic effect of ICS/LABA/LAMA intake with a single device might be another cause of SITT's greater efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) using endobronchial valves (EBV) is a treatment option for a subset of patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), suffering from emphysema and hyperinflation. In this pilot study, we aimed to determine the presence of bacterial biofilm infections on EBV and investigate their involvement in lack of clinical benefits, worsening symptomatology, and increased exacerbations that lead to the decision to remove EBVs. We analyzed ten COPD patients with ELVR who underwent EBV removal. Clinical data were compared to the microbiological findings from conventional EBV culture. In addition, EBV were analyzed by FISHseq, a combination of Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with PCR and sequencing, for visualization and identification of microorganisms and biofilms. All ten patients presented with clinical symptoms, including pneumonia and recurrent exacerbations. Microbiological cultures from EBV detected several microorganisms in all ten patients. FISHseq showed either mixed or monospecies colonization on the EBV, including oropharyngeal bacterial flora, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus spp., and Fusobacterium sp. On 5/10 EBV, FISHseq visualized biofilms, on 1/10 microbial microcolonies, on 3/10 single microorganisms, and on 1/10 no microorganisms. The results of the study demonstrate the presence of biofilms on EBV for the first time and its potential involvement in increased exacerbations and clinical worsening in patients with ELVR. However, further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the clinical relevance of biofilm formation on EBV and appropriate treatment options to avoid infections in patients with ELVR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractObjectiveMethodsResultsConclusionSevere asthma presents significant management challenges, often requiring advanced treatments to control symptoms and reduce exacerbations. The use of monoclonal antibodies has revolutionized the clinical course of patients with severe asthma, showing a significant impact on exacerbations reduction, oral corticosteroids (OCS) cessation and on the improvement of lung function and quality of life. Tezepelumab, an anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) monoclonal antibody, has emerged as a potential therapeutic option for these patients.We conducted an observational, prospective, multicenter study including 20 patients with confirmed severe asthma according to ERS guidelines and GINA recommendations. Patients received Tezepelumab 210 mg every 4 wk due to uncontrolled asthma despite maximal inhalation treatment with ICS/LABA. Data were collected before treatment initiation (T0) and after three months from the first administration (T3).After three months of Tezepelumab treatment, we reported significant improvements in asthma symptoms and quality of life, as well as a consistent reduction in exacerbations and OCS use. We found no statistically meaningful differences among main clinical and functional outcomes according to inflammatory biomarkers, while lung function improved significantly in patients with less allergic sensitization. No serious adverse event was reported during the follow up, while the rates of mild adverse effects were comparable to those from registration trials.Tezepelumab demonstrated short-term efficacy in improving asthma control and quality of life, showing a favorable safety profile. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up would confirm these findings and identify predictors of response to Tezepelumab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractBackgroundAimMethodsResultsConclusionsAsthma, a chronic inflammatory condition affecting the airways, significantly impacts both respiratory function and quality of life. Recent studies have highlighted the psychological dimensions of chronic diseases like asthma. Despite growing evidence linking asthma with various psychopathological conditions, comprehensive data remains scarce.This study aims to explore the psychopathological status of asthma patients and identify demographic and clinical factors associated with higher levels of psychopathological symptoms.Data were collected from 42 asthma patients attending the Asthma Outpatient Clinic at the University of Thessaly, Greece. Participants completed a detailed questionnaire on demographics and clinical parameters, along with the Symptoms Checklist-90 (SCL-90) to assess psychological symptoms.The sample included patients with varying asthma severity: 38% with severe asthma and 62% with mild-moderate asthma, with a mean age of 60.8 ± 15.6 years. Results indicated that 23.8% exhibited somatization symptoms, 23.8% showed compulsive behaviors, 33.8% reported interpersonal sensitivity, and 38.1% experienced depression and 38.1% aggressiveness. Additionally, 45.2% struggled with fearful anxiety, 4.8% showed paranoid ideation, and 11.9% had traits of psychoticism. Women had significantly higher psychopathology scores than men. Factors such as longer disease duration, uncontrolled asthma, severe asthma, and comorbid conditions like atopy and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were linked to higher psychopathological scores.The study found a high prevalence of psychopathological symptoms among asthma patients. Female gender, prolonged asthma duration, persistent symptoms, comorbid diseases (GERD, atopy) and greater disease severity were significantly associated with higher psychopathology, underscoring the need for integrated mental health care in asthma management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractObjectiveMethodsResultsConclusionsMost studies investigating at-risk groups for poor inhaler technique (PT) have been in adolescents. However, evidence suggests older age correlates with PT. This study aimed to correlate patient characteristics with PT in an adult asthma cohort in the Bronx.We categorized 237 patients with uncontrolled asthma by demonstration of good inhaler technique (GT) (n = 112) or PT (n = 58) at their initial visit. Independent variables included age, sex, ethnicity, language, insurance status, BMI, depression severity, and socioeconomic data. Two logistic regression models were created to assess odds of PT among independent variables at initial visit and odds of improvement in technique at follow-up.At the initial visit, patients with PT had a mean age of 53.74 (±13.54) versus 45.12 (±13.26) among those with GT (p= <0.001). The PT group also had a lower percentage of patients with private insurance (52.53% versus 71.15%, p = 0.037). When controlling for language, ethnicity, insurance status, and educational attainment, the odds of PT increased with age (OR, 1.051; CI, 1.017-1.087, p = 0.003) and BMI (OR, 1.065; CI, 1.010-1.123, p = 0.020). Males had lower odds of PT (OR, 0.379; CI, 0.144-0.997; p = 0.049). While insurance status did not affect odds of PT, Medicaid users had lower odds of improving technique (OR, 0.184; CI, 0.040-0.854; p = 0.031).At baseline, individuals with PT were younger and more likely to be on a public health insurance plan. Increasing age, increasing BMI, and female sex were associated with higher odds of PT at the baseline visit, but were not associated with improvements in technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Clinical remission is a relatively new concept in asthma but recent research initiatives suggest it could be an ambitious and achievable therapeutic target for patients with asthma. Methods: In this modified Delphi study (comprising two online surveys, completed either side of a virtual scientific workshop), the opinions of a panel of respiratory physicians were evaluated to summarize perspective statements on key therapeutic outcomes and criteria for on-treatment clinical remission in patients with moderate asthma. An agreement threshold was pre-defined as agreement by ≥ 75% of participants. Results: Surveys 1 and 2 were completed by 20 and 18 participants, respectively. Most participants (95%) agreed with the concept of clinical remission in moderate asthma and that this should be a desirable treatment goal (90%). Based on a composite measure of 4–6 desirable therapeutic outcomes, current understanding of clinical remission was considered as 12 months with no exacerbations, no oral corticosteroids, no daytime or night-time asthma symptoms (Asthma Control Test score ≥ 20 or Asthma Control Questionnaire score ≤ 0.75), stable lung function, and no treatment-related adverse events. No agreement was reached on the role of relievers in defining therapeutic outcomes or on the wider use of biomarkers and airway hyperresponsiveness for defining asthma remission in clinical practice. Conclusions: In line with recent consensus statements from the United States and Europe, there was a high level of agreement on the elements of clinical remission among a panel of respiratory physicians from Asia, the Middle East, and South America. Extension of the concept of clinical remission to patients with moderate asthma was considered aligned with the potential of clinical remission as a goal of therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Patients living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are challenged with managing the medical, social, and emotional consequences of the disease. Self-management of the disease plays a major role in actively preventing a deterioration such as an acute exacerbation (AECOPD). The aim of this study was to explore patients’ perspectives on self-management, for both participants who received a complex multicomponent behavior-focused intervention (e.g., physical activity) after hospitalization (intervention group) and participants who did not (control group). Design: A qualitative descriptive study design was used. Methods: Semi-structured one-to-one interviews were conducted (n = 10). A newly implemented counselling program conducted by an Advanced Nursing Practice (ANP) care team was introduced as part of the study. Participants in the control group received standard treatment for hospitalized AECOPD, while the intervention group received counselling focused on patient self-management from the ANP care team over a 13-week period. Control and intervention group narratives were compared using framework analysis. Results: The predominant four topics in both groups were deducted from Lorig’s conceptualization of self-management. These were: the management of burdensome emotions, the management of life roles, the management of medical regimen and recommendations, and the perception of self-management needs. The participants in the intervention group reported that counselling by the ANP team helped motivate them to sustain physical activity. They also found it reassuring to have a contact person they could easily reach out to in case of any queries or uncertainties, which provided them with a sense of security. Conclusion: There is a need for support in several areas of self-management after hospitalization for AECOPD. The newly introduced nurse-led self-management support was immediately well-received. Indeed, all participants appreciated the contact with their respective health professionals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Patients with asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype may be eligible for additional treatment options to improve disease control; however, the prevalence and frequency of eosinophil testing is unknown. This study assessed blood eosinophil count testing prevalence in patients with asthma by exacerbation frequency and healthcare provider (HCP) type. Methods This was a retrospective, longitudinal, real-world study (GSK ID: 214470) utilizing the Merative Explorys® Universe electronic health records database. Eligible patients had ≥ 2 asthma diagnostic codes (January 2016–December 2018) (Index date: first asthma diagnosis). Outcomes included patient demographics and clinical characteristics (12 months pre-index [baseline]), and prevalence of blood eosinophil count testing, stratified by exacerbation frequency (infrequent exacerbations [

Victoria S Benson,1,&ast; James Siddall,2,&ast; Adam Haq,2 Mark Small,2 Zhiliu Tang,3 Tao Ye,4 Peter Howarth,5 Anna Richards,6 Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho7 1Epidemiology, Value Evidence & Outcomes, GSK, London, UK; 2Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK; 3Value Evidence & Outcomes, GSK, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 4Medical Affairs, Respiratory, GSK, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 5Global Respiratory Franchise, GSK, Brentford, UK; 6Value Evidence & Outcomes, GSK, London, UK; 7Value Evidence & Outcomes, GSK, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Tao Ye, Medical Affairs, Respiratory, GSK, 902 halei Road, Pudong, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China, Email ark.x.ye@gsk.comPurpose: To inform effective management strategies for severe asthma in China, this study aimed to comprehensively characterize clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, disease control status, and healthcare resource utilization among patients on GINA Step 4/5 therapies by analyzing data from the Adelphi Asthma Disease Specific Program conducted in China.Patients and methods: All information was retrieved from medical records or collected from physicians and patients on the survey date (August–December 2018); no follow-up was conducted. Results were summarized descriptively for patients on GINA Step 4/5 therapies, who were pooled from a consecutive sample (comprising three or more consecutive patients with physician-diagnosed asthma from each participating physician) and an oversample (comprising the next two patients with physician-perceived severe asthma from each participating physician).Results: Of the included patients (n=754), 51.5% had ever had a blood eosinophil measurement taken, 22.1% had available records for their most recent blood eosinophil measurements (68.9% of them had an elevated level ≥ 150 cells/μL), 39.9% had ever been tested for specific immunoglobulin E or radioallergosorbent, and 8.0% were prescribed maintenance oral corticosteroids. Asthma was not well controlled in 69.2% of patients. In the prior year, 27.1% experienced at least one severe exacerbation and 22.8% experienced at least one hospitalization (emergency visit or overnight stay) due to asthma.Conclusion: In Chinese patients with asthma on GINA Step 4/5 therapies, biomarker testing was underutilized, asthma was not well controlled, and severe exacerbations were not infrequent. These findings highlight the urgent need for optimized asthma management for patients on GINA Step 4/5 therapies in China.Keywords: severe asthma, type-2 high asthma, real-world, phenotype, exacerbations, health care resource utilization, eosinophils

Abstract Endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) using endobronchial valves (EBV) is a treatment option for a subset of patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), suffering from emphysema and hyperinflation. In this pilot study, we aimed to determine the presence of bacterial biofilm infections on EBV and investigate their involvement in lack of clinical benefits, worsening symptomatology, and increased exacerbations that lead to the decision to remove EBVs. We analyzed ten COPD patients with ELVR who underwent EBV removal. Clinical data were compared to the microbiological findings from conventional EBV culture. In addition, EBV were analyzed by FISHseq, a combination of Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with PCR and sequencing, for visualization and identification of microorganisms and biofilms. All ten patients presented with clinical symptoms, including pneumonia and recurrent exacerbations. Microbiological cultures from EBV detected several microorganisms in all ten patients. FISHseq showed either mixed or monospecies colonization on the EBV, including oropharyngeal bacterial flora, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus spp., and Fusobacterium sp. On 5/10 EBV, FISHseq visualized biofilms, on 1/10 microbial microcolonies, on 3/10 single microorganisms, and on 1/10 no microorganisms. The results of the study demonstrate the presence of biofilms on EBV for the first time and its potential involvement in increased exacerbations and clinical worsening in patients with ELVR. However, further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the clinical relevance of biofilm formation on EBV and appropriate treatment options to avoid infections in patients with ELVR.

Over the last two decades, we have witnessed great advancements in our understanding of the immunological pathways of asthma, leading to the development of targeted therapies, such as biologic drugs, that have radically and definitively changed the clinical outcomes of severe asthma. Despite the numerous therapeutic options available, ~4–10% of all people with asthma have severe or uncontrolled asthma, associated with an increased risk of developing chronic oral corticosteroid use, fixed airflow limitation, exacerbations, hospitalization and, finally, increased healthcare costs. The new concept of disease modification in asthma comes from the evolution of asthma management, which encompasses phenotyping patients with different inflammatory endotypes characterizing the disease, followed by the advent of more effective therapies capable of targeting the proximal factors of airway inflammation. This treat-to-target approach aims to achieve remission of the disease. Because the novel treatment paradigm for severe asthma with the advent of biologic therapies is no longer clinical control but rather clinical remission – a step closer to the concept of cure – a deeper and more accurate understanding of the critical causal mechanisms and endotypes of asthma is necessary to achieve the goal of clinical remission, which has the potential to generate real life-changing benefits for patients. This review aims to frame the evolution of the debated concept of clinical remission and provide clinicians with insights that may be helpful in achieving remission in the greatest number of patients.

Aim: Patients living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are challenged with managing the medical, social, and emotional consequences of the disease. Self-management of the disease plays a major role in actively preventing a deterioration such as an acute exacerbation (AECOPD). The aim of this study was to explore patients' perspectives on self-management, for both participants who received a complex multicomponent behavior-focused intervention (e.g., physical activity) after hospitalization (intervention group) and participants who did not (control group). Design: A qualitative descriptive study design was used. Methods: Semi-structured one-to-one interviews were conducted (n = 10). A newly implemented counselling program conducted by an Advanced Nursing Practice (ANP) care team was introduced as part of the study. Participants in the control group received standard treatment for hospitalized AECOPD, while the intervention group received counselling focused on patient self-management from the ANP care team over a 13-week period. Control and intervention group narratives were compared using framework analysis. Results: The predominant four topics in both groups were deducted from Lorig's conceptualization of self-management. These were: the management of burdensome emotions, the management of life roles, the management of medical regimen and recommendations, and the perception of self-management needs. The participants in the intervention group reported that counselling by the ANP team helped motivate them to sustain physical activity. They also found it reassuring to have a contact person they could easily reach out to in case of any queries or uncertainties, which provided them with a sense of security. Conclusion: There is a need for support in several areas of self-management after hospitalization for AECOPD. The newly introduced nurse-led self-management support was immediately well-received. Indeed, all participants appreciated the contact with their respective health professionals.

The coexistence of depression with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been associated with poorer outcomes. Studies have questioned the safety of antidepressants in patients with COPD. This review shows the potential relationships and the possible mechanisms and gives us good warnings on how to approach this problem. Treatment should be both non-pharmacological and pharmacological, but importantly tailored to the individual patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: There are limited real-world data on outcomes in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFBE). This study assessed clinical characteristics and survival in patients with NCFBE by baseline exacerbation rate. Methods: Patients with bronchiectasis (≥ 1 inpatient or ≥ 2 outpatient claims with a bronchiectasis diagnosis code, or one outpatient claim with bronchiectasis code and a chest computed tomography scan) were from the 100% Medicare Fee-for-Service database (Jan 2014–Dec 2020). Patients had continuous enrollment ≥ 12 months pre-index (baseline) and post-index (follow-up), with index a random bronchiectasis claim preceded by ≥ 12 months bronchiectasis history. Patients with cystic fibrosis were excluded. Patients were stratified by exacerbations during baseline (0, 1, or ≥ 2). Follow-up exacerbation rate and all-cause mortality were assessed. Controls were identified using a multistep direct matching approach. Time to death from index was estimated by Kaplan–Meier analyses. Results: Exacerbation analysis included 92,529 patients with NCFBE and 92,529 matched controls. Exacerbations were common (43% had ≥ 1 exacerbation), with patients with more baseline exacerbations more likely to have ≥ 2 exacerbations during follow-up (11.4%, 24.2%, and 46.8% of patients with 0, 1, and ≥ 2 baseline exacerbations, respectively). Survival analysis included 110,298 patients with NCFBE and 110,298 controls. Time to death was shorter in patients with more baseline exacerbations (P < 0.0001). Five-year survival was 55.3%, 62.6%, and 65.4% for patients with ≥ 2, 1, and 0 baseline exacerbations, respectively, compared with 64.1% for controls. Conclusions: In these patients with NCFBE, exacerbations were common. History of exacerbations was associated with future exacerbations and increased all-cause mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In Japan, patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can be escalated to treatment with inhaled triple therapy. Two single-inhaler triple therapies combining an inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LAMA/LABA) are approved maintenance therapies for patients with COPD, and multiple-inhaler triple therapies (MITTs) are also available. There is limited evidence regarding real-life treatment patterns and characteristics of patients with COPD initiating triple therapies. Methods: This observational, retrospective cohort study identified patients with COPD in Japan from an administrative claims database (May 2018–December 2021). Demographics, clinical characteristics, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) were assessed in four cohorts initiating a triple therapy: budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF) early adopters (initiated ≤ 12 months after market approval [September 1, 2019]), contemporary BGF users (initiated > 12 months after market approval), fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) users, and any MITT users. Results: A total of 636 patients were BGF early adopters, 2558 were contemporary BGF users, 11,187 used FF/UMEC/VI, and 5931 used MITT. The percentage of patients with concomitant asthma in each cohort was 73.0%, BGF early adopter; 74.2%, contemporary BGF; 75.7%, FF/UMEC/VI; and 84.5%, MITT. During the 12-month baseline period, the frequency of patients with ≥ 1 moderate/severe exacerbation was 18.2%, BGF early adopter; 14.3%, contemporary BGF; 13.1%, FF/UMEC/VI; and 14.0%, MITT. ICS/LABA treatment during baseline was the most frequent pathway to triple therapy, ranging from 38.2% to 51.7% across cohorts. HCRU was relatively high across cohorts (range of hospital outpatient visits/patient during the 12-month baseline period, 11.0–14.1). Multimorbidity was observed in > 80% of patients in all cohorts; cardiovascular diseases were among the most common. Conclusion: Many patients initiating triple therapy for COPD had concomitant asthma and had previously received ICS/LABA maintenance therapy. Patients prescribed BGF in the initial post-launch period were more likely to have a previous exacerbation history versus other cohorts, indicating more severe disease. Plain Language Summary: In Japan, single inhalers containing three medicines, known as single-inhaler triple therapies, are approved for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). These inhalers include one medicine that reduces inflammation (a corticosteroid) and two medicines that expand the airways in the lung (bronchodilators). There are two approved single-inhaler triple therapies for long-term COPD treatment in Japan, consisting of active substances referred to as budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF) or fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI). Although guidance is available to doctors on when to prescribe single-inhaler triple therapy, two important questions related to use in routine clinical practice remain: when are these medicines prescribed, and what types of patients receive them. To answer these questions, we assessed anonymized medical claims of people with COPD obtained from a large database in Japan. People with COPD who had used triple therapy were split into four groups: early BGF users (started treatment within 1-year of approval in Japan), contemporary BGF users (started treatment over 1-year after approval in Japan), FF/UMEC/VI users, and users of any multiple-inhaler triple therapy. Our findings showed that the majority of patients starting any triple therapy had diagnoses of both asthma and COPD, and multiple other medical conditions, including heart-related conditions. Healthcare use, including outpatient hospital clinic visits, was high across all groups before starting triple therapy. As early BGF users were more likely to have previous flare-ups (acute worsening of COPD symptoms) than the other groups, upon approval in Japan, doctors may have initially prescribed BGF to people with more severe COPD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Introduction Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality. Dysregulated and enhanced immune-inflammatory responses have been described in COPD. Recent data showed impaired immune responses and, in particular, of interferon (IFNs) signaling pathway in these patients. Aim To evaluate in peripheral lung of COPD patients, the expression of some of the less investigated key components of the innate immune responses leading to IFN productions including: IFN-receptors (IFNAR1/IFNAR2), IRF-3 and MDA-5. Correlations with clinical traits and with the inflammatory cell profile have been assessed. Methods Lung specimens were collected from 58 subjects undergoing thoracic surgery: 22 COPD patients, 21 smokers with normal lung function (SC) and 15 non-smoker controls (nSC). The expression of IFNAR1, IFNAR2, IRF-3 and MDA-5, of eosinophils and activated NK cells (NKp46+) were quantified in the peripheral lung by immunohistochemistry. Results A significant increase of IRF-3 + alveolar macrophages were observed in COPD and SC compared with nSC subjects. However, in COPD patients, the lower the levels of IRF-3 + alveolar macrophages the lower the FEV1 and the higher the exacerbation rate. The presence of chronic bronchitis (CB) was also associated with low levels of IRF-3 + alveolar macrophages. NKp46 + cells, but not eosinophils, were increased in COPD patients compared to nSC patients (p

Abstract Background Prompt and effective management with maintenance therapy (single or dual bronchodilator therapy) is recommended after the initial diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to maintain lung function and prevent exacerbations. Contrary to guideline-based recommendations, most patients are not prescribed maintenance treatment at initial diagnosis. The current study assessed the pharmacologic treatment patterns and outcomes of newly diagnosed patients with COPD in the USA. Methods This retrospective, noninterventional study used de-identified data from the Inovalon Insights’ database (Commercial, Medicaid Managed Care, and Medicare Advantage–insured individuals) between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2021. The “patient journey” from initial diagnosis was followed over a 4-year period. The primary outcome measure was the number of moderate or severe exacerbations. Secondary outcome measures included the cumulative incidence of exacerbations, mean cumulative count of moderate and severe exacerbations, rates of moderate and severe exacerbations in patients who remained untreated after diagnosis in 12-month time periods for 4 years, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and pharmacologic treatment patterns. Results The cohort consisted of 238,158 newly diagnosed patients with COPD (female [52.9%]; mean age 63.8 years). The majority of patients with COPD had Medicaid as their primary insurance (46.2%). Overall, during the 4-year follow-up period, 32.9% of the patients had at least one moderate or severe exacerbation, and 25.8% and 13.8% experienced moderate and severe exacerbations, respectively. At diagnosis, 86.2% of the patients were untreated and most remained untreated by the end of the follow-up (63.8%). Most patients (62.0%) received long-acting beta-agonist (LABA)/inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as their initial treatment at diagnosis, and LABA/ICS continued to be the most common initial treatment during the 4-year period (64.0% at year 1; 58.0% at year 4). Conclusions Most patients with COPD were not treated at initial diagnosis and remained untreated during follow-up. Our data highlight a lack of adherence to recommendations for clinical practice.

Abstract Introduction Clinical remission is a relatively new concept in asthma but recent research initiatives suggest it could be an ambitious and achievable therapeutic target for patients with asthma. Methods In this modified Delphi study (comprising two online surveys, completed either side of a virtual scientific workshop), the opinions of a panel of respiratory physicians were evaluated to summarize perspective statements on key therapeutic outcomes and criteria for on-treatment clinical remission in patients with moderate asthma. An agreement threshold was pre-defined as agreement by ≥ 75% of participants. Results Surveys 1 and 2 were completed by 20 and 18 participants, respectively. Most participants (95%) agreed with the concept of clinical remission in moderate asthma and that this should be a desirable treatment goal (90%). Based on a composite measure of 4–6 desirable therapeutic outcomes, current understanding of clinical remission was considered as 12 months with no exacerbations, no oral corticosteroids, no daytime or night-time asthma symptoms (Asthma Control Test score ≥ 20 or Asthma Control Questionnaire score ≤ 0.75), stable lung function, and no treatment-related adverse events. No agreement was reached on the role of relievers in defining therapeutic outcomes or on the wider use of biomarkers and airway hyperresponsiveness for defining asthma remission in clinical practice. Conclusions In line with recent consensus statements from the United States and Europe, there was a high level of agreement on the elements of clinical remission among a panel of respiratory physicians from Asia, the Middle East, and South America. Extension of the concept of clinical remission to patients with moderate asthma was considered aligned with the potential of clinical remission as a goal of therapy.

This research letter published in the Clinical & Experimental Allergy journal discusses a study on the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on individuals with severe asthma. The study found that PR was associated with improvements in asthma control, a reduction in severe exacerbations, and a decrease in glucocorticoid use. However, the study had limitations and further research is needed to confirm these findings. Overall, the study suggests that PR may be beneficial for individuals with severe asthma, but more research is necessary to determine its role in managing the condition. [Extracted from the article]

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality. Dysregulated and enhanced immune-inflammatory responses have been described in COPD. Recent data showed impaired immune responses and, in particular, of interferon (IFNs) signaling pathway in these patients. Aim: To evaluate in peripheral lung of COPD patients, the expression of some of the less investigated key components of the innate immune responses leading to IFN productions including: IFN-receptors (IFNAR1/IFNAR2), IRF-3 and MDA-5. Correlations with clinical traits and with the inflammatory cell profile have been assessed. Methods: Lung specimens were collected from 58 subjects undergoing thoracic surgery: 22 COPD patients, 21 smokers with normal lung function (SC) and 15 non-smoker controls (nSC). The expression of IFNAR1, IFNAR2, IRF-3 and MDA-5, of eosinophils and activated NK cells (NKp46+) were quantified in the peripheral lung by immunohistochemistry. Results: A significant increase of IRF-3 + alveolar macrophages were observed in COPD and SC compared with nSC subjects. However, in COPD patients, the lower the levels of IRF-3 + alveolar macrophages the lower the FEV1 and the higher the exacerbation rate. The presence of chronic bronchitis (CB) was also associated with low levels of IRF-3 + alveolar macrophages. NKp46 + cells, but not eosinophils, were increased in COPD patients compared to nSC patients (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Smoking is associated with higher levels of innate immune response as showed by higher levels of IRF-3 + alveolar macrophages and NKp46 + cells. In COPD, exacerbation rates, severe airflow obstruction and CB were associated with lower levels of IRF-3 expression, suggesting that innate immune responses characterize specific clinical traits of the disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Bronchiectasis (BE) has been traditionally associated with neutrophilic inflammation, but eosinophilic bronchiectasis (EB) has recently emerged. Data about prevalence, clinical features, and disease severity are lacking. This study aimed to assess the EB prevalence, compare EB with non-EB, evaluate the Type-2 (T2) high endotype in BE (T2-high EB) versus non-T2-high EB, and identify EB predictors. Methods: We conducted a prospective study involving 153 BE patients. The data collected included clinical, radiological, and microbiological findings. BE severity was assessed using the bronchiectasis severity index (BSI), FACED and E-FACED scores, and the bronchiectasis etiology and comorbidity index (BACI). EB was defined as a blood eosinophil count (BEC) ≥ 300 cells/μL, and T2-high EB as BEC ≥ 300 cells/μL with fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) ≥ 25 ppb. Results: Prevalence was 27% for EB and 20% for T2-high EB. EB patients exhibited poorer lung function and more severe radiologic features, with significantly higher severity scores [BSI, FACED, E-FACED, BACI (p < 0.05)], and a higher median exacerbation rate [4 (2–5) in EB vs. 2 (1–4) in non-EB, p = 0.0002], compared with non-EB patients. T2-high EB patients showed higher severity scores [BSI, FACED, E-FACED (p < 0.05)], as well as worse lung function parameters [FEV1%, FVC%, FEF 25–75% (p < 0.05)] compared with non-T2-high EB patients. In our study, patients with EB exhibited notably worsened lung function and higher BE severity scores compared with their non-EB counterparts, with exacerbations playing a major role in these differences. We found statistically significant positive correlations between BEC and disease severity scores, such as BSI, FACED, and mMRC, as well as an inverse relationship with pulmonary function. The likelihood of EB being present was significantly higher in association with mMRC ≥ 1 (OR = 2.53; 95% CI, 1.26–5.64), exacerbations/year ≥ 1 (OR = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.0–1.63), and chronic PA colonization (OR = 3.9; 95% CI, 1.08–15.8). Conclusions: EB is a distinct endotype. Dyspnea, exacerbations, and PA colonization may be predictive of EB, emphasizing the importance of early detection for improved outcomes. BEC could serve as a useful biomarker of disease severity to consider when diagnosing EB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Prompt and effective management with maintenance therapy (single or dual bronchodilator therapy) is recommended after the initial diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to maintain lung function and prevent exacerbations. Contrary to guideline-based recommendations, most patients are not prescribed maintenance treatment at initial diagnosis. The current study assessed the pharmacologic treatment patterns and outcomes of newly diagnosed patients with COPD in the USA. Methods: This retrospective, noninterventional study used de-identified data from the Inovalon Insights' database (Commercial, Medicaid Managed Care, and Medicare Advantage–insured individuals) between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2021. The "patient journey" from initial diagnosis was followed over a 4-year period. The primary outcome measure was the number of moderate or severe exacerbations. Secondary outcome measures included the cumulative incidence of exacerbations, mean cumulative count of moderate and severe exacerbations, rates of moderate and severe exacerbations in patients who remained untreated after diagnosis in 12-month time periods for 4 years, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and pharmacologic treatment patterns. Results: The cohort consisted of 238,158 newly diagnosed patients with COPD (female [52.9%]; mean age 63.8 years). The majority of patients with COPD had Medicaid as their primary insurance (46.2%). Overall, during the 4-year follow-up period, 32.9% of the patients had at least one moderate or severe exacerbation, and 25.8% and 13.8% experienced moderate and severe exacerbations, respectively. At diagnosis, 86.2% of the patients were untreated and most remained untreated by the end of the follow-up (63.8%). Most patients (62.0%) received long-acting beta-agonist (LABA)/inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as their initial treatment at diagnosis, and LABA/ICS continued to be the most common initial treatment during the 4-year period (64.0% at year 1; 58.0% at year 4). Conclusions: Most patients with COPD were not treated at initial diagnosis and remained untreated during follow-up. Our data highlight a lack of adherence to recommendations for clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Cystic fibrosis is a genetically determined disease that significantly influences and shortens life. Treatment with CFTR modulators (CFTR-T) is a new hope for patients. It can change the predictive values of a poor prognosis (e.g., exacerbation rate and FEV1 value). The aim of the study was to analyse exacerbation incidence and spirometry data before and after one year (+/− 2 weeks) of CFTR-T in 85 CF patients at the CF Centre in Poznań. To our knowledge, this is the first analysis of CFTR-T efficiency in the Central–Eastern Europe population. Methods: We retrospectively analysed the spirometry and exacerbation data of 85 CF adult patients (both men and women), who in the middle of 2022 began treatment with CFTR modulators. Results: The one-year ratio of hospitalisation caused by severe exacerbations lowered from 1.25 to 0.21 per patient per year. We also saw a 66% decline in ambulatory exacerbations. The median FEV1% increased by 9.60% in absolute values and by 460 mL. Even in the group with very severe obstruction (FEV1 < 35%), there was an increase in median FEV1% of 5.9 in absolute values. We also proved the increase in FVC% (median 17.10% in absolute value and 600 mL) in the study group. Conclusions: After one year of treatment, an impressive improvement was observed in two important predictive values of poor prognosis: exacerbation rate and FEV1 values. Further observation is needed to determine how long the improvement will be present and its influence on quality of life and life expectancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) suffer not only from somatic symptoms but also from symptoms of anxiety, depression, and stress. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have been shown to effectively reduce these symptoms in other conditions. In patients with AECOPD, MBIs are under-researched. The present study explored whether patients hospitalized for AECOPD perceive MBIs as appropriate and feasible, and how MBIs might be implemented and adapted for this patient group. Method: In an exploratory qualitative study, one-time semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 patients hospitalized for AECOPD (65% women; Mage=70.85 years, SD=7.53). Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis and a codebook approach. Results: Most patients were interested in add-on treatment options such as MBIs and considered them as potentially beneficial (65%). Patients' understanding of mindfulness varied and was difficult to separate from other mind-body practices (e.g., autogenic training). Previous experiences with mind-body practices and expectations regarding the effectiveness of MBIs influenced patients' interest in MBIs. Context factors (e.g., short exercises) were more important than content factors (e.g., type of exercise). General barriers (e.g., scheduling issues) and COPD-related limitations (e.g., decreased mobility) hindered the self-administration of MBIs. Conclusions: Most patients hospitalized for AECOPD interviewed in this study were interested in MBIs and rated them as potentially helpful and feasible to incorporate in health care settings and everyday life. Future studies investigating MBIs in COPD are needed and should carefully consider patients' perspectives, addressing context factors (e.g., timing, exercise length), patients' needs, and COPD-related limitations. Preregistration: This study is not preregistered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: Bronchiectasis is characterized by acute exacerbations, but the biological mechanisms underlying these events are poorly characterized. Objectives: To investigate the inflammatory and microbial characteristics of exacerbations of bronchiectasis. Methods: A total of 120 patients with bronchiectasis were enrolled and presented with acute exacerbations within 12 months. Spontaneous sputum samples were obtained during a period of clinical stability and again at exacerbation before receipt of antibiotic treatment. A validated rapid PCR assay for bacteria and viruses was used to classify exacerbations as bacterial, viral, or both. Sputum inflammatory assessments included label-free liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and measurement of sputum cytokines and neutrophil elastase activity. 16 s rRNA sequencing was used to characterize the microbiome. Measurements and Main Results: Bronchiectasis exacerbations showed profound molecular heterogeneity. At least one bacterium was identified in 103 samples (86%), and a high bacterial load (total bacterial load > 107 copies/g) was observed in 81 patients (68%). Respiratory viruses were identified in 55 (46%) patients, with rhinovirus being the most common virus (31%). PCR testing was more sensitive than culture. No consistent change in the microbiome was observed at exacerbation. Exacerbations were associated with increased neutrophil elastase, proteinase-3, IL-1β, and CXCL8. These markers were particularly associated with bacterial and bacterial plus viral exacerbations. Distinct inflammatory and microbiome profiles were seen between different exacerbation subtypes, including bacterial, viral, and eosinophilic events in both hypothesis-led and hypothesis-free analysis using integrated microbiome and proteomics, demonstrating four subtypes of exacerbation. Conclusions: Bronchiectasis exacerbations are heterogeneous events with contributions from bacteria, viruses, and inflammatory dysregulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: COPD and bronchiectasis are commonly reported together. Studies report varying impacts of co-diagnosis on outcomes, which may be related to different definitions of disease used across studies. Objectives: To investigate the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) associated with bronchiectasis and its relationship with clinical outcomes. We further investigated the impact of implementing the standardized ROSE criteria (radiological bronchiectasis [R], obstruction [FEV1/FVC ratio <0.7; O], symptoms [S], and exposure [⩾10 pack-years of smoking; E]), an objective definition of the association of bronchiectasis with COPD. Methods: Analysis of the EMBARC (European Bronchiectasis Registry), a prospective observational study of patients with computed tomography–confirmed bronchiectasis from 28 countries. The ROSE criteria were used to objectively define the association of bronchiectasis with COPD. Key outcomes during a maximum of 5 years of follow-up were exacerbations, hospitalization, and mortality. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 16,730 patients with bronchiectasis were included; 4,336 had a clinician-assigned codiagnosis of COPD, and these patients had more exacerbations, worse quality of life, and higher severity scores. We observed marked overdiagnosis of COPD: 22.2% of patients with a diagnosis of COPD did not have airflow obstruction and 31.9% did not have a history of ⩾10 pack-years of smoking. Therefore, 2,157 patients (55.4%) met the ROSE criteria for COPD. Compared with patients without COPD, patients who met the ROSE criteria had increased risks of exacerbations and exacerbations resulting in hospitalization during follow-up (incidence rate ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.15–1.35; vs. incidence rate ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.51–1.90, respectively). Conclusions: The label of COPD is often applied to patients with bronchiectasis who do not have objective evidence of airflow obstruction or a smoking history. Patients with a clinical label of COPD have worse clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this pilot study was to assess the efficacy of doxofylline as an ICS-sparing agent in the treatment of Mexican children with asthma. 10-week, open-label, crossover, pilot study, we examined the steroid-sparing effect of doxofylline in Mexican children with asthma. Patients aged 6–16 years treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for at least 8 wk before enrollment were divided randomly into two groups at the baseline visit. Group A (n = 31) received doxofylline (18 mg/kg/day) plus standard-dose budesonide (D + SDB) for the first 4-week period followed by doxofylline plus reduced-dose budesonide (D + RDB) for the second 4-week period. Group B (n = 30) received D + RDB followed by D + SDB. Clinical outcomes assessed included lung function (forced expiratory volume; in 1 s, FEV1), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), asthma control, number of exacerbations and use of rescue medication (salbutamol). It was shown that combined use of doxofylline and ICS may allow children with asthma to reduce their daily dose of ICS while maintaining lung function and improving asthma control (p = 0.008). There were few asthma exacerbations and only one patient required treatment with systemic corticosteroids. Rescue medication use decreased significantly in patients receiving D + SDB during the first 4-week period. Our results suggest that doxofylline may be a steroid-sparing treatment in asthma, but longer-term, controlled studies are needed to confirm these observations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Asthma is commonly reported in patients with a diagnosis of bronchiectasis. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether patients with bronchiectasis and asthma (BE+A) had a different clinical phenotype and different outcomes compared with patients with bronchiectasis without concomitant asthma. A prospective observational pan-European registry (European Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration) enrolled patients across 28 countries. Adult patients with computed tomography–confirmed bronchiectasis were reviewed at baseline and annual follow-up visits using an electronic case report form. Asthma was diagnosed by the local investigator. Follow-up data were used to explore differences in exacerbation frequency between groups using a negative binomial regression model. Survival analysis used Cox proportional hazards regression. Of 16,963 patients with bronchiectasis included for analysis, 5,267 (31.0%) had investigator-reported asthma. Patients with BE+A were younger, were more likely to be female and never smokers, and had a higher body mass index than patients with bronchiectasis without asthma. BE+A was associated with a higher prevalence of rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps as well as eosinophilia and Aspergillus sensitization. BE+A had similar microbiology but significantly lower severity of disease using the bronchiectasis severity index. Patients with BE+A were at increased risk of exacerbation after adjustment for disease severity and multiple confounders. Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use was associated with reduced mortality in patients with BE+A (adjusted hazard ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.95) and reduced risk of hospitalization (rate ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.67-0.86) compared with control subjects without asthma and not receiving ICSs. BE+A was common and was associated with an increased risk of exacerbations and improved outcomes with ICS use. Unexpectedly we identified significantly lower mortality in patients with BE+A. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Major randomized clinical trials have shown that biological therapy can reduce the exacerbation rate and oral corticosteroid (OCS) dosage in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. However, data on the continuation, efficacy, and safety of biological therapy in older patients with asthma are limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in the continuation rate, efficacy, and safety of biological therapy between older (≥ 65 years) and younger (< 65 years) patients with asthma. Methods: In this single-center retrospective observational study, we collected clinical data of patients with asthma who were administered biological drugs such as omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab between April 2009 and August 2022. We comparatively analyzed the continuation, efficacy, and safety of biological therapy between older (age = 65 years) and younger patient (age < 65 years) groups. The reasons for discontinuation or switching of biological drugs were also evaluated. Results: Sixty-two (31 older and 31 younger) patients were treated with 91 biologics during the observational period. The mean age of older patients was 74.3 ± 5.1 years and that of younger patients was 48.0 ± 14.0 years. The continuation rate of biological therapy was not significantly different between the groups. Social background was the most common reason for discontinuation of biological therapy in both groups, and insufficient effect was the most common reason for switching to biological drugs. Asthma exacerbations decreased in both groups within the first 12 months of biologic therapy. The dosage of OCS tended to decrease in the older group and significantly decrease in the younger group. Conclusion: Biologic therapy for older patients with asthma can be continued, with efficacy and safety similar to those in younger patients with asthma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available regarding marijuana smokings impact on the development or progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in middle-aged or older adults with a variable history of tobacco cigarette smoking. METHODS: We divided ever-tobacco smoking participants in the SubPopulations and InteRmediate Outcomes In COPD Study (SPIROMICS) into 3 groups based on self-reported marijuana use: current, former, or never marijuana smokers (CMSs, FMSs or NMSs, respectively). Longitudinal data were analyzed in participants with ≥2 visits over a period of ≥52 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: We compared CMSs, FMSs, and NMSs, and those with varying amounts of lifetime marijuana use. Mixed effects linear regression models were used to analyze changes in spirometry, symptoms, health status, and radiographic metrics; zero-inflated negative binomial models were used for exacerbation rates. All models were adjusted for age, sex, race, baseline tobacco smoking amount, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) %predicted. RESULTS: Most participants were followed for ≥4 years. Annual rates of change in FEV1, incident COPD, respiratory symptoms, health status, radiographic extent of emphysema or air trapping, and total or severe exacerbations were not different between CMSs or FMSs versus NMSs or between those with any lifetime amount of marijuana use versus NMSs. CONCLUSIONS: Among SPIROMICS participants with or without COPD, neither former nor current marijuana smoking of any lifetime amount was associated with evidence of COPD progression or its development. Because of our studys limitations, these findings underscore the need for further studies to better understand longer-term effects of marijuana smoking in COPD.

Introduction: Patients' adherence is essential for COPD self-management, as beneficial effects can only be expected in adherent patients. We explored associations between patients’ adherence to COPD exacerbation action plans and health outcomes. Materials and methods: Pooled COPD self-treatment intervention group data from two RCTs were analysed, only including patients who had ≥1 COPD exacerbation or started ≥1 course of oral corticosteroids over one-year follow-up. Optimal adherence was defined as ‘self-treatment initiated ≤1 day before or after exacerbation start’, suboptimal adherence as ‘self-treatment initiated 2 days before or after exacerbation start or no self-treatment initiated for a short (1–3 days) exacerbation’, and significant delay or no treatment as ‘self-treatment initiated >2 days after exacerbation start or no self-treatment initiated for a longer (>3 days) exacerbation’. Regression models were built for several health outcomes, with the number of COPD exacerbation days/patient/year being the primary outcome. Results: Patients with significant delay or no treatment (n = 46) had more exacerbation days/patient/year (33.3 (95 % CI 10.9; 55.6)) than optimal adherent patients (n = 38) (23.7 (95 % CI 1.7; 45.7)). The duration per COPD exacerbation was longer for patients with significant delay or no treatment (15.5 days) compared to optimal adherent patients (7.8 days). No differences in health outcomes were observed between optimal and suboptimal adherent patients. Conclusions: Being adherent to action plans is associated with better health outcomes than significant delayed treatment or no treatment at all. Interestingly, suboptimal adherence demonstrated health benefits comparable to optimal adherence. COPD self-management interventions should prioritise strategies to optimise patients’ adherence to action plans.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Eosinophilia, which may have a significant role in the inflammation process and obstruction of airways, is present in about one third patients suffering from COPD. The significance of eosinophil counts in COPD is currently debated, but they can potentially serve as biomarkers for treatment selection. Blood eosinophil counts can assist in determining the patients who can benefit from inhaled corticosteroid therapy to prevent or eliminate exacerbations. The aim of this review is to demonstrate the significance of eosinophilic inflammation COPD and the use of eosinophilic inflammation biomarkers to guide therapy decisions. To reach this goal, a search of relevant literature on the subject was conducted. Articles were searched in electronic sources: PubMed and Google Scholar. The keywords "COPD and eosinophilia", "COPD exacerbations and eosinophilia", "inhaled corticosteroids, COPD and eosinophilia" were used. One hundred and twenty sources were found, of which 66 were selected. Results of the review showed high frequency of eosinophilic phenotype detection in COPD. Blood eosinophilia becomes a potential universal marker of eosinophilic COPD. Blood eosinophils level can predict response to inhaled corticosteroids treatment patients with COPD, but increases the likelihood of pneumonia. Overall, the role of eosinophilia in COPD has not been obtained to date, which suggests it needs further study.

Abstract Background The evidence regarding effects of statins on exacerbation risk in COPD remains controversial. Previous studies often excluded patients with cardiovascular comorbidities despite their high prevalence in COPD and role for exacerbations. Based on the cardioprotective properties of statins, we hypothesised that statins may reduce the risk of exacerbations especially in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities. Methods One thousand eight hundred eighty seven patients of the German COPD cohort COSYCONET (COPD and Systemic Consequences Comorbidities Network) of GOLD grades 1–4 (37.8% female, mean age 64.78 ± 8.3) were examined at baseline and over a period of 4.5 years for the occurrence of at least one exacerbation or severe exacerbation per year in cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses adjusted for age, gender, BMI, GOLD grade and pack-years. Due to their collinearity, various cardiovascular diseases were tested in separate analyses, whereby the potential effect of statins in the presence of a specific comorbidity was tested as interaction between statins and comorbidity. We also identified patients who never took statins, always took statins, or initiated statin intake during the follow-up. Results One thousand three hundred six patients never took statins, 31.6% were statin user, and 12.9% initiated statins during the follow-up. Most cardiovascular diseases were significantly (p

Abstract Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality in the Philippines and majority of the economic burden lies in hospitalizations during an exacerbation. Despite coverage of hospitalization cost with the national health insurance system (Phil-Health) for COPD exacerbations, patients often pay out-of-pocket. This study aimed to determine the demographic characteristics of COPD admissions at a Philippine tertiary care center, Philippine General Hospital, and assess mean cost of hospitalization, and identify predictors of prolonged hospitalization and cost > 20,000 Philippine pesos (Php). A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted for 6 months by chart review. Patients were categorized as charity service patients, that is, with no charged professional fees and free medications and private service patients who pay for their health care services. A total of 43 COPD admissions were included. The average daily cost of hospitalization (at peso-dollar rate of 56) for service patients was at $ 75.89 compared to private service patients at $ 285.71. Demographic characteristics and type of accommodation were not significant predictors of prolonged hospital stay nor hospitalization cost of ≥ $ 357. Accommodation cost and professional fees accounted for majority or 61.6% of the overall cost for private patients, while medications and diagnostic tests were the major or 76.01% contributor to the overall cost for charity patients. Despite existence of Phil-health, in-patient coverage for COPD remain insufficient. Measures for maximizing COPD control in the out-patient setting could potentially reduce total cost for this disease.

Abstract Background Bronchiectasis is a pulmonary disease characterized by irreversible dilation of the bronchi and recurring respiratory infections. Few studies have described the microbiology and prevalence of infections in large patient populations outside of specialized tertiary care centers. Methods We used the Cerner HealthFacts Electronic Health Record database to characterize the nature, burden, and frequency of pulmonary infections among persons with bronchiectasis. Chronic infections were defined based on organism-specific guidelines. Results We identified 7,749 patients who met our incident bronchiectasis case definition. In this study population, the organisms with the highest rates of isolate prevalence were Pseudomonas aeruginosa with 937 (12%) individuals, Staphylococcus aureus with 502 (6%), Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) with 336 (4%), and Aspergillus sp. with 288 (4%). Among persons with at least one isolate of each respective pathogen, 219 (23%) met criteria for chronic P. aeruginosa colonization, 74 (15%) met criteria for S. aureus chronic colonization, 101 (30%) met criteria for MAC chronic infection, and 50 (17%) met criteria for Aspergillus sp. chronic infection. Of 5,795 persons with at least two years of observation, 1,860 (32%) had a bronchiectasis exacerbation and 3,462 (60%) were hospitalized within two years of bronchiectasis diagnoses. Among patients with chronic respiratory infections, the two-year occurrence of exacerbations was 53% and for hospitalizations was 82%. Conclusions Patients with bronchiectasis experiencing chronic respiratory infections have high rates of hospitalization.

Tham T Le,1 Benjamin Emmanuel,1 Rohit Katial,2 Trung N Tran,1 Justin Joseph Kwiatek,1 David S Cohen,1 Shoshana R Daniel,3 Yunhui Cao,1 Vivian H Shih,1 Maria Gil Melcón,4 Gilles Devouassoux,5 Girolamo Pelaia6 On behalf of the RANS Study Investigators1BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA; 2Center for Clinical Immunology, National Jewish Health & University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA; 3Market Access Consulting, Fortrea Inc., Durham, NC, USA; 4Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; 5Department of Pulmonology, Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, and F-CRIN INSERM Network CRISALIS, Toulouse, France; 6Department of Health Sciences, University “Magna Graecia” of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, ItalyCorrespondence: Girolamo Pelaia, University “Magna Graecia” of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy, Tel +39 961 3647171, Fax +39 961 3647193, Email pelaia@unicz.itPurpose: Real-world evidence of benralizumab effectiveness on nasal polyps (NP) and asthma outcomes in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) and comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis with NP are limited. The objective of this study was to assess NP and asthma outcomes in benralizumab-treated patients with SEA and comorbid NP in a real-world setting.Patients and Methods: RANS was a retrospective, multi-country observational study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05180357) using medical chart reviews of adults with SEA and comorbid NP. Total NP Score (NPS), SinoNasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) total score, annualized exacerbation rate (AER), and 6-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6) and Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores during the 12 months pre-index (baseline) and post-index (follow-up) were measured. Clinically meaningful improvement from baseline following treatment, in terms of total NPS (≥ 1-point reduction), SNOT-22 total (≥ 8.9-point reduction), ACQ-6 (≥ 0.5-point reduction) or ACT (≥ 3-point increase) scores, were reported.Results: A total of 233 patients were included. Baseline mean (standard deviation [SD]) NPS and SNOT-22 total scores were 3.8 (2.4) and 47.5 (22.6), respectively. The mean change (95% confidence interval [CI]) from baseline was – 1.2 (– 1.7, – 0.6) for NPS, and – 19.8 (– 23.6, – 15.9) for SNOT-22. The AER (95% CI) was 1.2 (0.96, 1.41) at baseline and 0.2 (0.13, 0.28) at follow-up. Mean (SD) ACQ-6 and ACT scores were 1.6 (1.3) and 15.0 (5.2) at baseline and 0.8 (1.0) and 22.0 (3.9) at follow-up, respectively. The proportion of patients who achieved clinically meaningful improvements in NPS, SNOT-22 total, ACQ-6, and ACT scores was 49.1%, 67.6%, 56.6%, and 81.1%, respectively.Conclusion: In this real-world study, improvements in NP and asthma outcomes in patients with SEA and comorbid NP were observed during the 12 months following benralizumab initiation.Keywords: exacerbations, comorbidity, biologics, patient-reported outcomes, SinoNasal Outcome Test-22, Nasal Polyps Score

Reynold Panettieri Jr,1 Njira Lugogo,2 Jonathan Corren,3 Christopher S Ambrose4 1Rutgers Institute for Translational Medicine and Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; 2Michigan Medicine Asthma Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 3Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 4AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USACorrespondence: Reynold Panettieri Jr, Rutgers Institute for Translational Medicine and Science, Rutgers University, 89 French Street, Suite 4210, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA, Tel +1 732-235-6404, Fax +1 732-235-7178, Email rp856@rbhs.rutgers.eduAbstract: Asthma is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease of the airways, affecting many children, adolescents, and adults worldwide. Up to 10% of people with asthma have severe disease, associated with a higher risk of hospitalizations, greater healthcare costs, and poorer outcomes. Patients with severe asthma generally require high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and additional controller medications to achieve disease control; however, many patients remain uncontrolled despite this intensive treatment. The treatment of severe uncontrolled asthma has improved with greater understanding of asthma pathways and phenotypes as well as the advent of targeted biologic therapies. Tezepelumab, a monoclonal antibody, blocks thymic stromal lymphopoietin, an epithelial cytokine that has multifaceted effects on the initiation and persistence of asthma inflammation and pathophysiology. Unlike other biologic treatments, tezepelumab has demonstrated efficacy across severe asthma phenotypes, with the magnitude of effects varying by phenotype. Here we describe the anti-inflammatory effects and efficacy of tezepelumab across the most relevant phenotypes of severe asthma. Across clinical studies, tezepelumab reduced annualized asthma exacerbation rates versus placebo by 63– 71% in eosinophilic severe asthma, by 58– 68% in allergic severe asthma, by 67– 71% in allergic and eosinophilic severe asthma, by 34– 49% in type 2-low asthma, and by 31– 41% in oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma. Furthermore, in all these asthma phenotypes, tezepelumab demonstrated higher efficacy in reducing exacerbations requiring hospitalizations or emergency department visits versus placebo. In patients with severe uncontrolled asthma, who commonly have multiple drivers of inflammation and disease, tezepelumab may modulate airway inflammation more extensively, as other available biologics block only specific downstream components of the inflammatory cascade.Plain Language Summary: Asthma is characterized by an immune response leading to airway inflammation. People with severe asthma may react to different triggers and develop different types of airway inflammation. In patients with asthma, a protein called thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) plays an important role in the immune response that leads to the signs and symptoms of asthma. TSLP is released by the airway lining in response to different asthma triggers, driving an immune chain reaction, leading to airway narrowing and tightening, increased airway inflammation, worsening asthma symptoms, and asthma attack. Tezepelumab is a monoclonal antibody (a type of protein) that prevents TSLP from attaching to its receptor, thereby blocking its activity, reducing airway inflammation and asthma symptoms. Tezepelumab is an add-on medicine for the treatment of people aged 12 years or older with severe asthma that is not controlled with their current medicines.In this article, we discuss how tezepelumab may work in different types of asthma, for example allergic asthma, eosinophilic asthma, and T2-low asthma. We also describe how effective tezepelumab is in these different asthma types, through the reduction of asthma attacks and improvement in lung function, symptom control, and quality of life, leading to fewer emergency department visits and hospitalizations for asthma.Keywords: exacerbations, eosinophilic, allergic, type 2, oral corticosteroid-dependent, airway hyperresponsiveness

Background Observational studies have linked low vitamin D (VD) levels to increased asthma attacks in children. Subsequent meta-analyses of adults and children revealed that VD treatment might benefit asthmatic patients by reducing the incidence of exacerbations. Therefore, this review aims to analyze the effects of VD supplementation in reducing asthma exacerbations in children.Methods Published reports from PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were systematically searched until April 2023. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database CRD42023411796. Randomized controlled trial studies were included in this review. Meta-analysis was performed using Cochrane RevMan 5.1 and presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results Ten relevant studies enrolled 1243 asthmatic children (631 children receiving vitamin D3 supplementation, 612 children receiving placebo) were included in this review. Our pooled analysis found that VD supplementation had a significant effect on lowering the total number of asthma exacerbations (RR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.87; p = 0.01). Subgroup analysis revealed that a daily dose of VD given based on standard daily dose recommendation had a significant improvement on asthma exacerbations [(RR 0.41; 95% CI: 0,18, 0,92; p = 0.03).Conclusions Vitamin D supplementation can lower the occurrence of exacerbations in children with asthma, along with the improvement of FEV1.

Introduction The study aimed to compare prevalence of comorbid allergic manifestations and rhinitis, allergy testing and associations with patient-related outcomes in patients with asthma and COPD.Methods Cross-sectional study of randomly selected Swedish patients with a doctor’s diagnosis of asthma (n = 1291) or COPD (n = 1329). Self-completion questionnaires from 2014 provided data on demographics, rhinitis, allergic symptoms at exposure to pollen or furry pets, exacerbations, self-assessed severity of disease and scores from the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), and records were reviewed for allergy tests.Results Allergic manifestations were more common in asthma (75%) compared with COPD (38%). Rhinitis was reported in 70% of asthma and 58% of COPD patients. Allergy tests had been performed during the previous decade in 28% of patients with asthma and in 8% of patients with COPD.In patients with asthma; comorbid allergy and rhinitis were both independently associated with increased risk for poor asthma symptom control (ACT < 20) (OR [95% CI] 1.41 [1.05 to 1.87] and 2.13 [1.60 to 2.83]), exacerbations (1.58 [1.15 to 2.17] and 1.38 [1.02 to 1.86]), and self-assessed moderate/severe disease (1.64 [1.22 to 2.18] and 1.75 [1.33 to 2.30]). In patients with COPD, comorbid allergy and rhinitis were both independently associated with increased risk for low health status (CAT ≥ 10) (OR [95% CI] 1.46 [1.20 to 1.95] and 2.59 [1.97 to 3.41]) respectively, with exacerbations during the previous six months (1.91 [1.49 to 2.45] and 1.57 [1.23 to 2.01]), and with self-assessed moderate/severe disease (1.70 [1.31 to 2.22] and 2.13 [1.66 to 2.74]).Conclusion Allergic manifestations and rhinitis are more common in asthma than COPD but associated with worse outcomes in both diseases. This highlights the importance of examining and treating comorbid allergy and rhinitis, not only in asthma but also in COPD.