Search

Complete revascularization of coronary artery disease has been linked to improved outcomes in patients with preserved left ventricular (LV) function. This study sought to identify the impact of complete revascularization in patients with severe LV dysfunction. Patients enrolled in the REVIVED-BCIS2 (Revascularization for Ischemic Ventricular Dysfunction) trial were eligible if baseline/procedural angiograms and viability studies were available for analysis by independent core laboratories. Anatomical and viability-guided completeness of revascularization were measured by the coronary and myocardial revascularization indices (RI coro and RI myo), respectively, where RI coro = (change in British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Jeopardy score [BCIS-JS]) / (baseline BCIS-JS) and RI myo = (number of revascularized viable segments) / (number of viable segments supplied by diseased vessels). The percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) group was classified as having complete or incomplete revascularization by median RI coro and RI myo. The primary outcome was death or hospitalization for heart failure. Of 700 randomized patients, 670 were included. The baseline BCIS-JS and SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) scores were 8 (Q1-Q3: 6-10) and 22 (Q1-Q3: 15-29), respectively. In those patients assigned to PCI, median RI coro and RI myo values were 67% and 85%, respectively. Compared with the group assigned to optimal medical therapy alone, there was no difference in the likelihood of the primary outcome in those patients receiving complete anatomical or viability-guided revascularization (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.62-1.32; and HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.66-1.35, respectively). A sensitivity analysis by residual SYNTAX score showed no association with outcome. In patients with severe LV dysfunction, neither complete anatomical nor viability-guided revascularization was associated with improved event-free survival compared with incomplete revascularization or treatment with medical therapy alone. (Revascularization for Ischemic Ventricular Dysfunction) [REVIVED-BCIS2]; NCT01920048) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Myocardial bridges (MBs) are prevalent and can be associated with acute and chronic ischemic syndromes. We sought to determine the substrates for ischemia in patients with angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries and a MB in the left anterior descending artery. METHODS: Patients with angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries underwent the acquisition of intracoronary pressure and flow during rest, supine bicycle exercise, and adenosine infusion. Coronary wave intensity analysis was performed, with perfusion efficiency defined as accelerating wave energy/total wave energy (%). Epicardial endothelial dysfunction was defined as a reduction in epicardial vessel diameter ≥20% in response to intracoronary acetylcholine infusion. Patients with angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries and a MB were compared with 2 angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries groups with no MB: 1 with coronary microvascular disease (CMD: coronary flow reserve, <2.5) and 1 with normal coronary flow reserve (reference: coronary flow reserve, ≥2.5). RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were enrolled in the study (30 MB, 33 CMD, and 29 reference). Fractional flow reserve in these 3 groups was 0.86±0.05, 0.92±0.04, and 0.94±0.05; coronary flow reserve was 2.5±0.5, 2.0±0.3, and 3.2±0.6. Perfusion efficiency increased numerically during exercise in the reference group (65±9%–69±13%; P=0.063) but decreased in the CMD (68±10%–50±10%; P<0.001) and MB (66±9%–55±9%; P<0.001) groups. The reduction in perfusion efficiency had distinct causes: in CMD, this was driven by microcirculation-derived energy in early diastole, whereas in MB, this was driven by diminished accelerating wave energy, due to the upstream bridge, in early systole. Epicardial endothelial dysfunction was more common in the MB group (54% versus 29% reference and 38% CMD). Overall, 93% of patients with a MB had an identifiable ischemic substrate. CONCLUSIONS: MBs led to impaired coronary perfusion efficiency during exercise, which was due to diminished accelerating wave energy in early systole compared with the reference group. Additionally, there was a high prevalence of endothelial and microvascular dysfunction. These ischemic mechanisms may represent distinct treatment targets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the setting of non-cardiac surgery, cardiac complications contribute to over a third of perioperative deaths. With over 230 million major surgeries performed annually, and an increasing prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and ischaemic heart disease, the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction is also rising. The recent European Society of Cardiology guidelines on cardiovascular risk in non-cardiac surgery elevated practices aiming to identify those at most risk, including biomarker monitoring and stress testing. However the current evidence base on if, and how, the risk of cardiac events can be modified is lacking. This review focuses on patient, surgical and cardiac risk assessment, as well as exploring the data on perioperative revascularization and other risk-reduction strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the most common cause of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; despite its prevalence, there is limited evidence to guide physicians in managing patients with CAD with percutaneous revascularization. The REVIVED-BCIS2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01920048) represents the first randomized trial to assess the value of percutaneous coronary intervention in addition to optimal medical therapy in patients with ischaemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction and stable CAD. In this article, we review the results of the REVIVED-BCIS2 trial and compare them to the ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00023595 trial (ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT00023595), which investigated the benefit of surgical revascularization on such patients. Finally, we suggest a pathway for physicians managing patients with ischaemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction based on the current evidence and highlight potential avenues for future research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is rising among people with HIV (PWH) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Despite the utility of the electrocardiogram (ECG) in screening for CVD, there is limited data regarding longitudinal ECG changes among PWH in SSA. In this study, we aimed to describe ECG changes over a 6-month period in a cohort of PWH in northern Tanzania. Between September 2020 and March 2021, adult PWH were recruited from Majengo HIV Care and Treatment Clinic (MCTC) in Moshi, Tanzania. Trained research assistants surveyed participants and obtained a baseline ECG. Participants then returned to MCTC for a 6-month follow-up, where another ECG was obtained. Two independent physician adjudicators interpreted baseline and follow-up ECGs for rhythm, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), bundle branch blocks, ST-segment changes, and T-wave inversion, using standardized criteria. New ECG abnormalities were defined as those that were absent in a patient's baseline ECG but present in their 6-month follow-up ECG. Of 500 enrolled participants, 476 (95.2%) completed follow-up. The mean (± SD) age of participants was 45.7 (± 11.0) years, 351 (73.7%) were female, and 495 (99.8%) were taking antiretroviral therapy. At baseline, 248 (52.1%) participants had one or more ECG abnormalities, the most common of which were LVH (n = 108, 22.7%) and T-wave inversion (n = 89, 18.7%). At six months, 112 (23.5%) participants developed new ECG abnormalities, including 40 (8.0%) cases of new T-wave inversion, 22 (4.6%) cases of new LVH, 12 (2.5%) cases of new ST elevation, and 11 (2.3%) cases of new prolonged QTc. Therefore, new ECG changes were common over a relatively short 6-month period, which suggests that subclinical CVD may develop rapidly in PWH in Tanzania. These data highlight the need for additional studies on CVD in PWH in SSA and the importance of routine CVD screening in this high-risk population., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Rahim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Guidelines recommend primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (PPICD) for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35% only after 3 months of optimal medical therapy (OMT) or 6 weeks after acute MI with persistent LVEF dysfunction. A 73-year-old woman presented with decompensated heart failure secondary to ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Severe coronary disease with sufficient dysfunctional myocardial segments on cardiac MRI suggested potential benefit from revascularisation. Following discussion with the heart team, she underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). PPICD implantation was deferred as per guideline recommendations. However, 20 days post-PCI, the patient died from malignant ventricular arrhythmia captured on a Holter monitor. This case demonstrates that some high-risk patients may not receive a potentially life-saving PPICD if guidelines are stringently adhered to. We highlight evidence that LVEF alone is of limited value in a risk assessment of arrhythmogenic death, and postulate that a more personalised ICD prescription should be considered using scar characteristics on cardiac MRI to prompt upstream ICD implantation in high-risk patients., Competing Interests: Disclosure: POK is editor-in-chief of Interventional Cardiology; this did not influence peer review. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Consent: Informed consent for publication of this care report has been obtained from the patient’s next of kin as the patient is deceased, sadly., (Copyright © 2023, Radcliffe Cardiology.)

Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffolds were designed to overcome the limitations imposed by drug-eluting stents; however, the Absorb BVS showed a 2% very late thrombosis rate. Suboptimal implantation technique has been proposed as a mechanism for the higher BVS thrombosis rate; one posthoc analysis suggested adequate pre- and postdilation in addition to proper sizing could reduce BVS thrombosis rates by 70%. This case acts as a proof of concept demonstrating advantages of BVS, namely, the ability to image the target vessel non-invasively and revascularize percutaneously or surgically if required. We advocate continued research and development in this technology given the attractive advantages, particularly in younger patients who are likely to require future coronary intervention and imaging.