Search

Background: Source modeling is an approach to reduce computational burden in Monte Carlo simulations but at the cost of reduced accuracy. Although this method can be effective, one component of the source model that is exceptionally difficult to model is the electron contamination, a significant contributor to the skin and shallow dose. Aims and Objectives: To improve the accuracy for the electron contamination component of the overall source model, we have generated a spatial mesh based surface source model. Methods and Materials: The source model is located downstream from the flattening filter and mirror but upstream from the movable jaws. A typical phase space file uses around ten parameters per particle, but this method simplifies this number to five components. By using only the electron distance from the central axis, angles from the central axis and energy, the computational time and disk space required is greatly reduced. Results and Conclusion: Despite the simplification in the source model, the electron contamination is still accurate to within 1.5%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction In this study, we aimed to calculate dose enhancement factor (DEF) for gold (Au) and iron (Fe) nanoparticles (NPs) in brachytherapy and teletherapy, using Monte Carlo (MC) method. Materials and Methods In this study, a new algorithm was introduced to calculate dose enhancement by AuNPs and FeNPs for Iridium-192 (Ir-192) brachytherapy and Cobalt-60 (Co-60) teletherapy sources, using the MC method. In this algorithm, the semi-random distribution of NPs was used instead of the regular distribution. Diameters were assumed to be 15, 30, and 100 nm in brachytherapy and 15 and 30 nm in teletherapy. Monte Carlo MCNP4C code was used for simulations, and NP density values were 0.107 mg/ml and 0.112 mg/ml in brachytherapy and teletherapy, respectively. Results AuNPs significantly enhanced the radiation dose in brachytherapy (approximately 60%), and 100 nm diameter NPs showed the most uniform dose distribution. AuNPs had an insignificant effect on teletherapy radiation field, with a dose enhancement ratio of 3% (about the calculation uncertainty) or less. In addition, FeNPs had an insignificant effect on both brachytherapy and teletherapy radiation fields. FeNPs dose enhancement was 3% in brachytherapy and 6% (about the calculation uncertainty) or less in teletherapy. Conclusion It can be concluded that AuNPs can significantly increase the absorbed dose in brachytherapy; however, FeNPs do not have a noticeable effect on the absorbed dose. Overall, AuNPs and FeNPs cannot increase the absorbed dose for the Co-60 teletherapy source. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Presently, public members are exposed to sources of ionizing radiation, and health risks due to radiation exposures should be a concern. This study aims to calculate the whole-body cumulative radiation exposure of taxi drivers. Also, this study will provide the effect of using a simple lead shield and three types of glass shield AVT6, TZN-D, and SLGC-E5, by calculating the effective annual dose of the taxi drivers that work in medical centers. Two MIRD phantoms as a driver and patient, a sample body of a taxi, pure lead, and glass sheets as a shield, were simulated using the MCNP code. We assumed that the patients had undergone the brain, liver, and kidney SPECT imaging by injecting 99mTC-HMPAO, 99mTC-sulfur colloid, and 99mTC-DMSA with the activity of 740MBq, 185MBq, and 333MBq, respectively. These shields are simulated on two sides of the driver, in the back and right side. The annual effective dose was calculated for 0–3.5 g/cm2 area densities. It was observed that the 0.45, 1.09, 1.28, and 2.11 g/cm2 of Pb, TZN-D, AVT6, and SLGC-E5 respectively decrease the effective dose below the allowed limit. According to the results, using the lead shield, the effective dose was reduced by a factor up to 7.25 times. It is recommended that taxi drivers wear a 0.4 mm lead shield or its equivalent when they have Tc-99 m injected patients. • The annual effective dose equivalent of a taxi drivers were calculated. • Two sited MIRD phantoms were simulated as a driver and patient. • Newly developed and lead shields simulated in two sides of the driver, in the back and right side. • By using the lead shield, the effective dose was reduced by a factor up to 7 times. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]