Search

Background: We developed a simplified ABC/2-derived method to estimate total subarachnoid hemorrhage volume (SAHV) on noncontrast computed tomography in patients with aneurysmal SAH and compared the clinical and radiographic outcomes., Methods and Results: In this retrospective observational cohort study, we analyzed 277 patients with SAH admitted to our Comprehensive Stroke Center between 2012 and 2022. We derived a mathematical model (model 1) by measuring SAH basal cisternal blood volume using an ABC/2-derived ellipsoid formula (A=width/thickness, B=length, C=vertical extension) on head noncontrast computed tomography in 5 major SAH cisternal compartments. We compared model 1 against a manual segmentation method (model 2) on noncontrast computed tomography. Data were analyzed using logistic regression analysis, t test, receiver operator characteristic curves, and area under the curve analysis. There was no significant difference in cisternal SAHV analysis between the 2 models ( P =0.14). Mean SAHV by the simplified method was 7.0 mL (95% CI, 5.89-8.09) for good outcome and 16.6 mL (95% CI, 13.49-19.77) for poor outcome. Patients with delayed cerebral ischemia had higher SAHV, with a cutoff value of 10 mL., Conclusions: Our simplified ABC/2-derived method to estimate SAHV is comparable to manual segmentation and can be performed in low-resource settings. Higher total SAHV was associated with worse outcomes and higher risk of delayed cerebral ischemia. A potential dose-response relationship was observed, with SAHV >10 mL predicting worse outcomes and higher risk of DCI.

Background: Employing a rebaselining concept may reduce noise in retinal layer thinning measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT)., Methods: From an ongoing prospective observational study, we included patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS), who had OCT scans at disease-modifying treatment (DMT) start (baseline), 6-12 months after baseline (rebaseline), and ⩾12 months after rebaseline. Mean annualized percent loss (aL) rates (%/year) were calculated both from baseline and rebaseline for peripapillary-retinal-nerve-fiber-layer (aLpRNFL baseline /aLpRNFL rebaseline ) and macular-ganglion-cell-plus-inner-plexiform-layer (aLGCIPL baseline /aLGCIPL rebaseline ) by mixed-effects linear regression models., Results: We included 173 RMS patients (mean age 31.7 years (SD 8.8), 72.8% female, median disease duration 15 months (12-94) median baseline-to-last-follow-up-interval 37 months (18-71); 56.6% moderately effective DMT (M-DMT), 43.4% highly effective DMT (HE-DMT)). Both mean aLpRNFL baseline and aLGCIPL baseline significantly increased in association with relapse (0.51% and 0.26% per relapse, p < 0.001, respectively) and disability worsening (1.10% and 0.48%, p < 0.001, respectively) before baseline, but not with DMT class. Contrarily, neither aLpRNFL rebaseline nor aLGCIPL rebaseline was dependent on relapse or disability worsening before baseline, while HE-DMT significantly lowered aLpRNFL rebaseline (by 0.31%, p < 0.001) and aLGCIPL rebaseline (0.25%, p < 0.001) compared with M-DMT., Conclusions: Applying a rebaselining concept significantly improves differentiation of DMT effects on retinal layer thinning by avoiding carry-over confounding from previous disease activity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Gabriel Bsteh has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Lilly, MedWhizz, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva. He has received unrestricted research grants from Celgene/BMS and Novartis.Harald Hegen has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Horizon, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Siemens and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva. He is associate editor of Frontiers in Neurology.Nik Krajnc has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Alexion, BMS/Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi Genzyme and held a grant for a Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Training Fellowship Programme from the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS).Fabian Föttinger has nothing to disclose.Patrick Altmann has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting from Biogen. He received a research grant from Quanterix International and was awarded a combined sponsorship from Biogen, Merck, Sanofi Genzyme, Roche, and Teva for a clinical study.Michael Auer has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme and Horizon Therapeutics.Klaus Berek has participated in meetings sponsored by and received travel funding from Biogen, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva.Barbara Kornek has received honoraria for speaking and for consulting from Biogen, BMS-Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Teva, and Sanofi Genzyme outside of the submitted work. No conflict of interest with respect to the present study.Fritz Leutmezer has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Actelion, Almirall, Biogen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva.Stefan Macher declares no conflict of interest relevant to this study.Tobias Monschein has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva.Markus Ponleitner has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker or consulting honoraria or travel funding from Amicus, Merck, Novartis and Sanofi Genzyme.Paulus Rommer has received honoraria for consultancy/speaking from Alexion/Astra Zeneca, Allmiral, Amgen/Horizon, Amicus, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi has received research grants from Amicus, Biogen, Merck, and Roche.Christiane Schmied declares no conflict of interest relevant to this study.Karin Zebenholzer received speaking honoraria or travel grants from Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme.Gudrun Zulehner has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva.Tobias Zrzavy has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva.Florian Deisenhammer has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria for acting as an advisor/speaker for Alexion, Almirall, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi Genzyme. His institution received scientific grants from Biogen and Sanofi Genzyme.Franziska Di Pauli has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene BMS, Horizon, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva, and Roche. Her institution has received research grants from Roche.Berthold Pemp has received honoraria for consulting from Novartis, has received honoraria for advisory boards/consulting from Chiesi and GenSight, and has received speaker honoraria from Novartis, Chiesi, and Santen.Thomas Berger has participated in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) from pharmaceutical companies marketing treatments for MS: Allergan, Bayer, Biogen, Bionorica, BMS/Celgene, Genesis, GSK, GW/Jazz Pharma, Horizon, Janssen-Cilag, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva, and UCB. His institution has received financial support in the past 12 months by unrestricted research grants (Biogen, Bayer, BMS/Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva) and for participation in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis sponsored by Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva.

Introduction: While acute Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affects the cardiovascular (CV) system according to recent data, an increased CV risk has been reported also during long-term follow-up (FU). In addition to other CV pathologies in COVID-19 survivors, an enhanced risk for arrhythmic events and sudden cardiac death (SCD) has been observed. While recommendations on post-discharge thromboprophylaxis are conflicting in this population, prophylactic short-term rivaroxaban therapy after hospital discharge showed promising results. However, the impact of this regimen on the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias has not been evaluated to date. Methods: To investigate the efficacy of this therapy, we conducted a single center, retrospective analysis of 1804 consecutive, hospitalized COVID-19 survivors between April and December 2020. Patients received either a 30-day post-discharge thromboprophylaxis treatment regimen using rivaroxaban 10 mg every day (QD) (Rivaroxaban group (Riva); n = 996) or no thromboprophylaxis (Control group (Ctrl); n = 808). Hospitalization for new atrial fibrillation (AF), new higher-degree Atrioventricular-block (AVB) as well as incidence of SCD were investigated in 12-month FU [FU: 347 (310/449) days]. Results: No differences in baseline characteristics (Ctrl vs Riva: age: 59.0 (48.9/66.8) vs 57 (46.5/64.9) years, p = n .s.; male: 41.5% vs 43.7%, p = n .s.) and in the history of relevant CV-disease were observed between the two groups. While hospitalizations for AVB were not reported in either group, relevant rates of hospitalizations for new AF (0.99%, n = 8/808) as well as a high rate of SCD events (2.35%, n = 19/808) were seen in the Ctrl. These cardiac events were attenuated by early post-discharge prophylactic rivaroxaban therapy (AF: n = 2/996, 0.20%, p = 0.026 and SCD: n = 3/996, 0.30%, p < 0.001) which was also observed after applying a logistic regression model for propensity score matching (AF: χ 2 -statistics = 6.45, p = 0.013 and SCD: χ 2 -statistics = 9.33, p = 0.002). Of note, no major bleeding complications were observed in either group. Conclusion: Atrial arrhythmic and SCD events are present during the first 12 months after hospitalization for COVID-19. Extended prophylactic Rivaroxaban therapy after hospital discharge could reduce new onset of AF and SCD in hospitalized COVID-19 survivors., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Fiedler, Motloch, Dieplinger, Jirak, Davtyan, Gareeva, Badykova, Badykov, Lakman, Agapitov, Sadikova, Pavlov, Föttinger, Mirna, Kopp, Hoppe, Pistulli, Cai, Yang and Zagidullin.)

Convalescent plasma (CP) has been in use for the treatment of numerous infectious diseases for more than a century, recently also for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A major challenge for this treatment is identifying suitable donors with sufficient levels of functional antibodies and to determine the optimal time span for CP donation. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 189 CP donations of 66 donors regarding anti-SARS-CoV-2 anti-S IgG antibody levels. We found a significant correlation between the semi-quantitative SARS-CoV-2 IgG ratio values and in vitro antibody functionality. A time-to-event analysis allowed us to predict the optimal time span of COVID-19 CP donor suitability. We found that high IgG ratio values, which significantly correlate with high in vitro antibody functionality, were suitable for CP donation for a median of 134 days after the first CP donation. Donors with lower IgG ratios were suitable for a median of 53 days. Our data support plasma collection centers to determine optimal points in time for CP donation by means of widely used semi-quantitative laboratory IgG ratio values.

In this retrospective single-center trial, we analyze 109 consecutive patients (female: 27.5%, median age: 69 years, median left ventricular ejection fraction: 20%) who survived sudden cardiac death (SCD) and needed hemodynamic support from an Impella assist device between 2008 and 2018. Rhythm monitoring is investigated in this population and associations with hospital survival are analyzed. Hospital mortality is high, at 83.5%. Diverse cardiac arrhythmias are frequently registered during Impella treatment. These include atrial fibrillation (AF, 21.1%) and ventricular tachycardia (VT, 18.3%), as well as AV block II°/III° (AVB, 7.3%), while intermittent asystole (ASY) is the most frequently observed arrhythmia (42.2%). Nevertheless, neither ventricular nor supraventricular tachycardias are associated with patients' survival. In patients who experience intermittent asystole, a trend towards a fatal outcome is noted ( p = 0.06). Conclusions: Mortality is high in these severely sick patients. While cardiac arrhythmias were frequent, they did not predict hospital mortality in this population. The hemodynamic support of the pump seems to counterbalance the adverse effects of these events.