Search

Roxadustat (FG-4592), an orally active hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase stabilizer, has been shown to enhance erythropoiesis by increasing endogenous erythropoietin. It is indicated for the treatment of anemia and chronic kidney disease and is approved for clinical use in several countries, including the European Union, Japan and others. Due to its reasonably anticipated performance-enhancing effect in athletes, roxadustat is prohibited for use in sports at all times. A few cases of adverse analytical findings in routine doping controls have been reported worldwide, some of which were claimed to be the result of contaminated dietary supplements. The present study offers new data demonstrating the long-term excretion pattern of roxadustat. Even after a single-dose administration, roxadustat can remain detectable in urine for 8 months, albeit at very low concentrations (<10 pg/mL). Following three times a week treatment with 70 to 100 mg of roxadustat, the drug was still detectable in the urine of anemic patients for between 9 and 18 months after treatment was discontinued. Lastly, an athlete who admitted use of roxadustat for almost a year (50 mg 3 to 5 times a week) has now tested positive multiple times over the course of 15 months (the first test being 12 months after the drug was discontinued), with an estimated concentration of roxadustat between 3 and 8 pg/mL. Altogether, these findings indicate the unusually prolonged terminal excretion kinetics of roxadustat, a property that testing authorities should consider in their results management process., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Clearum™ is a high flux steam sterilized dialyzer for patients with hemodialysis or hemodiafiltration. This study evaluated the safety and performance of the Clearum high flux steam sterilized hemodialyzer in the removal of small and middle-sized toxins., Methods: A prospective, interventional, nonrandomized study enrolled twenty end-stage renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis. The Clearum high flux steam sterilized dialyzer was compared to Fresenius FX dialyzers for baseline comparison. The duration of the trial was 2 weeks for the FX dialyzer and 6 weeks with the Clearum high flux steam sterilized dialyzer. In vitro studies with dextrans of varying sizes were performed to compare the membrane characteristics and sieving coefficient curves for the two dialyzers., Results: The primary objective of a mean urea reduction ratio >65% was met, with no significant difference in mean urea reduction ratio between the Clearum high flux steam sterilized and Fresenius FX-series of dialyzers (p = 0.86). No dialyzer-related adverse events were reported in the study. β-2-microglobulin reduction with the Clearum high flux steam sterilized dialyzer was statistically higher than the FX-series dialyzer (66.5% vs. 53.6%; p < 0.0001). Predialysis interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein concentrations, blood-rest scores (residual blood after blood restitution), and thrombin-anti-thrombin values were comparable. Albumin remained stable during the 6 weeks of Clearum high flux steam sterilized dialyzer use, with no appreciable differences compared to the Fresenius FX-series., Conclusion: The Clearum high flux steam sterilized dialyzer showed good mid-term effectivity for small and middle molecule removal with no reported dialyzer-related adverse events., (© 2023 Bellco S.r.l. Artificial Organs published by International Center for Artificial Organ and Transplantation (ICAOT) and Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Thromboembolic events have occurred in clinical trials of roxadustat. This post hoc analysis explored potential factors related to thromboembolic events in dialysis-dependent patients treated with roxadustat in four phase 3 clinical trials in Japan., Methods: Thromboembolic events with onset before and after week 12 were evaluated. Baseline risk factors for thromboembolic events were investigated by Cox regression analyses. Nested case-control analyses using conditional logistic models with matched pairs of case-control data explored relationships between thromboembolic events and laboratory parameters., Results: Of the 444 patients, 56 thromboembolic events were observed in 44 patients during ≤ 52 weeks of treatment. The proportion of venous and arterial thromboembolic events gradually increased after week 12. Baseline risk factors included hemodialysis (vs peritoneal dialysis), advanced age (≥ 65 years), shorter dialysis vintage (< 4 months), and history of thromboembolism. The absence of concomitant intravenous or oral iron therapy (including ferric citrate) was associated with thromboembolic events before week 12 (hazard ratio 11.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.36-37.71; vs presence). Case-control analysis revealed that low average transferrin saturation (< 10%; unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 6.25; 95% CI 1.52-25.62; vs ≥ 20%), high average transferrin level (≥ 2.5 g/L; unadjusted OR 4.36; 95% CI 1.23-15.39; vs < 2.0 g/L), and high average roxadustat dose (≥ 150 mg; unadjusted OR 5.95; 95% CI 1.07-33.16; vs < 50 mg) over the previous 8 weeks before the event onset were associated with thromboembolic events after week 12. However, adjustment for iron status extinguished the significant relationship between roxadustat dose and events. Multivariate case-control analysis showed that increased transferrin from baseline (≥ 1.0 g/L; adjusted OR 7.85; 95% CI 1.82-33.90; vs < 0.5 g/dL) and decreased mean corpuscular volume (< - 2 fL; adjusted OR 5.55; 95% CI 1.73-17.83; vs ≥ 0 fL) were associated with increased risk of thromboembolic events., Conclusion: In addition to established risk factors, iron deficiency may be related to thromboembolic events. Graphical Abstract available for this article., Trial Registration: NCT02780726, NCT02952092, NCT02780141, NCT02779764., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Risk factors for thromboembolic events in patients with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) receiving roxadustat are unknown. Iron deficiency has been reported as a risk factor for thrombosis in the general population., Methods: Thromboembolic events with onset before and after week 12 in patients receiving roxadustat were evaluated in this pooled analysis of four global phase 3 trials, PYRENEES, SIERRAS, HIMALAYAS, and ROCKIES. Baseline risk factors for thromboembolic events were investigated by Cox regression analyses. Nested case-control analyses with matched pairs of case-control data explored the relationship between thromboembolic events and last known laboratory parameters before event onset., Results: Of 2354 patients, 1026 thromboembolic events were observed in 568 patients. Baseline risk factors found included hemodialysis (vs peritoneal dialysis), advanced age (≥ 65 years), Black race, high high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and history of thromboembolism, cardiovascular disease, or diabetes. Univariate case-control analyses revealed that high hemoglobin rate of rise (≥ 0.5 g/dL/week; odds ratio [OR] 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-4.46) showed a trend towards increased risk of thromboembolic events before week 12, and high rate of hemoglobin decline was associated with events after week 12 (< - 0.5 g/dL/week; OR 3.73; 95% CI 1.68-8.27) as compared to stable hemoglobin levels (≥ - 0.1 to < 0.1 g/dL/week). Multivariate case-control analyses showed that low last known hemoglobin level (< 10 g/dL: adjusted OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.04-3.50; vs ≥ 12 g/dL) and low last known transferrin saturation (TSAT < 10%: adjusted OR 3.78; 95% CI 1.71-8.39; vs ≥ 30%) before event onset were associated with events after week 12. In patients with last known TSAT < 30%, higher roxadustat dose was associated with thromboembolic events; however, no association was observed in those with TSAT ≥ 30%., Conclusions: Among various risk factors for thromboembolic events, it is reasonable to avoid a rapid increase and decline in hemoglobin levels as well as ensure TSAT ≥ 30%, rather than increasing the roxadustat dose. Graphical Abstract available for this article., Trial Registration: NCT02278341, NCT02273726, NCT02052310, NCT02174731., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: This study was conducted to elucidate the safety of roxadustat, an oral medication, in patients with non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) or incident dialysis dialysis-dependent (ID-DD) chronic kidney disease (CKD)., Methods: Safety results from four phase 3, randomized, open-label studies comparing roxadustat to an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) in men and women with NDD or ID-DD CKD with anemia were pooled and evaluated. Endpoints were time to major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality) and MACE+ (MACE plus congestive heart failure or unstable angina requiring hospitalization), all-cause mortality, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). MACE and MACE+ were evaluated for non-inferiority at 1.8- and 1.3-margins using hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). TEAEs were descriptively summarized., Results: In total, 2142 patients were evaluated (1083 roxadustat; 1059 ESA). Roxadustat was comparable to ESA for risk of MACE (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61-1.02), MACE+ (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.98), and all-cause mortality (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.57-1.05). TEAEs were comparable between roxadustat and ESA groups, including any TEAE [incidence rate per 100 (IR/100) patient-exposure years 56.1 vs. 53.5], TEAEs leading to study drug discontinuation (IR/100 patient-exposure years 6.7 vs. 5.1), and TEAEs leading to death (IR/100 patient-exposure years 6.9 vs. 7.4)., Conclusion: There was no evidence of increased risk of cardiovascular events or mortality with roxadustat compared with ESA in patients with anemia who have NDD or ID-DD CKD. Although TEAEs occurred commonly in both the roxadustat and ESA groups, patients infrequently discontinued the study drug because of an adverse event., Clinical Trial Registration Numbers: DOLOMITES, 1517-CL-0610 [NCT02021318]; HIMALAYAS, FGCL-4592-063 [NCT02052310]; SIERRAS, FGCL-4592-064 [NCT02273726]; and ROCKIES, D5740C00002 [NCT02174731]., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Biosimilars offer the potential to expand patient access and reduce healthcare costs. Therefore, it is of importance that clinicians and patients are reassured about their efficacy and safety in practice. In 2007, Binocrit® (HX575; Sandoz GmbH, Kundl, Austria) was the first epoetin alfa biosimilar approved for use in chemotherapy induced anaemia (CIA), chronic renal failure (CRF), and more recently myelodysplastic (MDS) anaemia. Since its approval, there has been a plethora of data demonstrating the well-tolerated safety profile of HX575. This review will outline the safety results collected from key studies that have added to the extensive HX575 (Binocrit® unless otherwise stated) clinical experience. With a focus on all approved indications, we will review the safety data collected across a range of study types, to further consolidate the reassurance for the use of HX575 in these indications., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest PG has received consulting fees/honoraria and payment for lectures (including service on speaker’s bureaus) from Amgen, Pfizer, and Sandoz. DG and FD have served as advisors to Sandoz (study Steering Committee members). MA has been a consultant for Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Clinigen, Eisai, Genomic Health, GSK, Helsinn, Hospira, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, Merck, Merck Serono, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sandoz, Tesaro, Teva, Vifor, G1 Therapeutics, and Lilly and has received honoraria for lectures at symposia sponsored by Amgen, Bayer Schering, Cephalon, Chugai, Eisai, Genomic Health, GSK, Helsinn, Hospira, Ipsen, Johnson & Johnson, OrthoBiotech, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Merck, Merck Serono, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, Tesaro, Taiho, Teva, Vifor, G1 Therapeutics, and Lilly. AE and MZ are employees of Sandoz GmbH., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

This study compared the immunogenicity and safety of a booster dose of HepB-CpG (HEPLISAV-B® vaccine) with HepB-Eng (Engerix-B®) and HepB-AS04 (Fendrix®) in patients receiving chronic hemodialysis. This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 study of adults receiving hemodialysis with antibodies to HBsAg (anti-HBs) <10 mIU/mL at study entry. The objective was to compare the seroprotection rate (SPR) induced by HepB-CpG with HepB-Eng or HepB-AS04. The SPR was defined as the percentage of patients with anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL post-vaccination. At 20 sites in Germany, 155 participants were randomized: HepB-CpG = 54; HepB-Eng = 50; and HepB-AS04 = 51. Of the 149 participants in the modified intention-to-treat population, 76.5% had not previously responded to at least one series of hepatitis B vaccine. Based on a post hoc analysis, the SPR in HepB-CpG recipients (52.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.6%, 66.7%) was significantly higher than in HepB-Eng recipients (32.6%; 95% CI: 19.5%, 48.0%), and non-inferior to that in HepB-AS04 recipients (43.1%; 95% CI: 29.3%, 57.8%). Local post-injection reactions occurred in significantly fewer HepB-CpG (9.3%) than HepB-AS04 recipients (31.4%; p = .007) and at a similar rate to HepB-Eng recipients (8.2%). Systemic post-injection reactions in HepB-CpG recipients (18.5%) were similar to the HepB-AS04 group (19.6%) and higher than in the HepB-Eng group (12.2%). In this difficult-to-immunize population, a booster dose of HepB-CpG induced significantly higher levels of seroprotection than HepB-Eng with a similar safety profile. The higher levels of immunogenicity were not accompanied by higher levels of local post-injection reactions compared with HepB-AS04.

Cytokines of the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) superfamily such as myostatin and activin A are considered as key regulators of skeletal muscle mass. In vivo, their activity is controlled by different binding proteins such as follistatin (FST), whose interaction with the circulating growth factors prevents activation of the activin type II receptors. FST-based protein therapeutics are therefore not only promising drug candidates for the treatment of muscular diseases but also potential performance-enhancing agents in sports. Within this study, two complementary detection assays for FST-based inhibitors of the TGF-β signaling pathways in doping control serum and plasma samples were developed by using both monomeric FST and dimeric FST-Fc fusion proteins as model compounds. The initial testing procedure is based on immunoaffinity purification, tryptic digestion, and LC-HRMS/MS, offering high specificity by targeting tryptic signature peptides of FST. As the glycoprotein is also produced endogenously, the confirmation method employs immunoaffinity purification, sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and Western blotting in order to detect the intact proteins and differentiate synthetic FST-Fc constructs from naturally occurring FST isoforms. Both assays were found to be highly specific with an estimated detection limit of 10 ng/ml. Moreover, a commercial sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to determine endogenous FST values. The detected FST serum levels of healthy volunteers were found below 5 ng/ml, which is in accordance with reference values from the literature and below the doping control detection methods' limit of detection (LOD). The presented assays expand the range of available tests for emerging doping agents, and the initial testing procedure can readily be modified to include further protein drugs., (© 2020 The Authors. Drug Testing and Analysis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) exhibit anemia, chronic kidney disease‒mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD), and cardiovascular disease. The REN-001 and REN-002 phase II, multicenter, randomized studies examined safety, tolerability, and effects of sotatercept, an ActRIIA-IgG1 fusion protein trap, on hemoglobin concentration; REN-001 also explored effects on bone mineral density (BMD) and abdominal aortic vascular calcification., Methods: Forty-three patients were treated in REN-001 (dose range: sotatercept 0.3‒0.7 mg/kg or placebo subcutaneously [s.c.] for 200 days) and 50 in REN-002 (dose range: 0.1‒0.4 mg/kg i.v. and 0.13‒0.5 mg/kg s.c. for 99 days)., Results: In REN-001, frequency of achieving target hemoglobin response (>10 g/dl [6.21 mmol/l]) with sotatercept was dose-related and greater than placebo (0.3 mg/kg: 33.3%; 0.5 mg/kg: 62.5%; 0.7 mg/kg: 77.8%; 0.7 mg/kg [doses 1 and 2]/0.4 mg/kg [doses 3‒15]: 33.3%; placebo: 27.3%). REN-002 hemoglobin findings were similar (i.v.: 16.7%-57.1%; s.c.: 11.1%‒42.9%). Dose-related achievement of ≥2% increase in femoral neck cortical BMD was seen among only REN-001 patients receiving sotatercept (0.3‒0.7 mg/kg: 20.0%‒57.1%; placebo: 0.0%). Abdominal aortic vascular calcification was slowed in a dose-related manner, with a ≤15% increase in Agatston score achieved by more REN-001 sotatercept versus placebo patients (60%‒100% vs. 16.7%). The most common adverse events during treatment were hypertension, muscle spasm, headache, arteriovenous fistula site complication, and influenza observed in both treatment and placebo groups., Conclusion: In patients with ESKD, sotatercept exhibited a favorable safety profile and was associated with trends in dose-related slowing of vascular calcification. Less-consistent trends in improved hemoglobin concentration and BMD were observed., (© 2019 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

In chronic kidney disease both renal insufficiency and chronic inflammation trigger elevated hepcidin levels, which impairs iron uptake, availability. and erythropoiesis. Here we report the two first-in-human phase 1 trials of PRS-080#22, a novel, rationally engineered Anticalin protein that targets and antagonizes hepcidin. A single intravenous infusion of placebo or PRS-080#22 was administered to 48 healthy volunteers (phase 1a) and 24 patients with end stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) on hemodialysis (phase 1b) at different doses (0.08-16mg/kg for the phase 1a study and 2-8mg/kg for the phase 1b study) in successive dosing cohorts. The primary endpoint for both randomized, double-blind, phase 1 trials was safety and tolerability. Following treatment, all subjects were evaluable, with none experiencing dose limiting toxicities. Most adverse events were mild. One serious adverse event occurred in the phase 1b (CKD patient) study. There were no clinically significant changes in safety laboratory values or vital signs. PRS-080#22 showed dose-proportional pharmacokinetics (PK), with a terminal half-life of approximately three days in healthy volunteers and 10 to 12 days in CKD patients. Serum hepcidin levels were suppressed in a dose dependent manner and remained low for up to 48 hours after dosing. PRS-080#22 dose-dependently mobilized serum iron with increases in both serum iron concentration and transferrin saturation. No consistent changes were observed with regard to ferritin, reticulocytes, hemoglobin, and reticulocyte hemoglobin. Low titer anti-drug-antibodies were detected in five healthy volunteers but in none of the CKD patients. PRS-080#22, a novel Anticalin protein with picomolar affinity for hepcidin, was safe and well-tolerated when administered to healthy volunteers and CKD patients at all doses tested. The drug exhibited linear pharmacokinetics, longer half-life in CKD patients in comparison to healthy volunteers as well as expected pharmacodynamic effects which hold promise for further clinical studies., Competing Interests: Louis Matis is an employee of Pieris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Rachel van Swelm and Dorine Swinkels are employees of the Radboudumc that, via the hepcidinanalysis.com initiative (http://www.hepcidinanalysis.com/), offers hepcidin measurements on a fee for service basis. Both studies were funded by Pieris Pharmaceuticals GmbH (https://www.pieris.com/). The phase I study in health volunteers was supported financially by the Eurocalin fund FP7-HEALTH.2011.1.4.3 (EUROpean Consortium for antiCALINs as next generation high-affinity protein therapeutics, https://www.bio-m.org/en/news/news-detail/munich-and-europe-european-eurocalin-consortiumwith-a-strong-munich-hallmark.html). Pieris Pharmaceuticals GmbH provided the study protocols based on the input from the authors of this manuscript, and the sponsor oversight according to GCP guidelines. Volunteers/patients were recruited by the phase 1 unit of Nuvisan GmbH for the healthy volunteers study and by the clinical centers (authors affiliations) for the CKD study. MVZ DaVita as a dialysis unit also recruited patients in the CKD study (affiliation of Prof. Dellana). Pieris Pharmaceuticals GmbH paid the per patient costs. Data analysis was performed by a CRO (Nuvisan GmbH for the healthy volunteers study and FGK for the CKD study) based on the study protocol on behalf of Pieris Pharmaceuticals GmbH. Hepcidin analysis was performed by hepcidinanalysis.com on behalf of Pieris Pharmaceuticals GmbH. The data and study reports were reviewed and commented upon by the authors of this publication, who also participated in writing and reviewing the manuscript. The decision to publish was taken jointly by the authors. Administrative support was provided by Pieris. PRS-080 is a product in clinical development and is protected by a number of patents, as is the Anticalin platform from which the drug candidate was generated. There are no marketed products to declare. This does not alter our adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Background: DOPPS reported that thousands of life-years could be gained in the US and Europe over 5 years by correcting six modifiable haemodialysis practices. We estimated potential life-years gained across 10 European countries using MONITOR-CKD5 study data., Methods: The DOPPS-based target ranges were used, except for haemoglobin due to label changes, as well as DOPPS-derived relative mortality risks. Percentages of MONITOR-CKD5 patients outside targets were calculated. Consistent with the DOPPS-based analyses, we extrapolated life-years gained for the MONITOR-CKD5 population over 5 years if all patients were within targets., Results: Bringing the 10 MONITOR-CKD5 countries' dialysis populations into compliance on the six practices results in a 5-year gain of 97,428 patient-years. In descending order, survival impact was the highest for albumin levels, followed by phosphate levels, vascular access, haemoglobin, dialysis adequacy, and interdialytic weight gain., Conclusions: Optimal management of the six modifiable haemodialysis practices may achieve 6.2% increase in 5-year survival., Trial Registration: NCT01121237 . Clinicaltrials.gov registration May 12, 2010 (retrospectively registered).

Biosimilars are biological medicines that are approved via stringently defined regulatory pathways on the basis that comparable safety, efficacy, and quality have been demonstrated to their reference medicine. The advantage of biosimilar drugs is that they may be less expensive than the reference medicine, allowing for greater patient access and cost savings in already stretched healthcare budgets. Biosimilar epoetins have been available in Europe for a decade. Complementing in vitro and preclinical characterization, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies, clinical trials provided the additional data needed to reassure European authorities that biosimilar epoetins were sufficiently similar to the reference epoetin to warrant approval. Post-approval, real-world studies have provided further evidence that biosimilar epoetins are an effective and well-tolerated option for the treatment of renal anemia, with ongoing pharmacovigilance and observational studies monitoring for any unexpected long-term signals that have not been identified in clinical development studies. As the evidence and experience with these products increase, many of the initial concerns are being alleviated. Nephrologists can be increasingly confident that European Medicines Agency-approved biosimilars offer high-quality, affordable, effective alternatives to existing reference medicines used to treat renal anemia, and may help yield cost savings and improve patient access.

Purpose: Inhibitors of the ActRII signaling pathways represent promising therapeutics for the treatment of muscular diseases, but also pose risks as performance-enhancing agents in sports. Bimagrumab is a human anti-ActRII antibody which was found to increase muscle mass and function by blocking ActRII signaling. As it has considerable potential for being misused as doping agent in sports, the aim of this study was to develop a mass spectrometric detection assay for doping control serum samples., Experimental Design: Within this study, a detection method for Bimagrumab in human serum was developed, which combines ammonium sulfate precipitation and affinity purification with proteolytic digestion and LC-HRMS. To facilitate the unambiguous identification of the diagnostic peptides, an orthogonal IM separation was additionally performed., Results: The assay was successfully validated and the analysis of clinical samples demonstrated its fitness for purpose for an application in routine doping control analysis., Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: Although no myostatin inhibitors have obtained clinical approval yet, the proactive development of detection methods for emerging doping agents represents a key aspect of preventive doping research. The presented approach will expand the range of available tests for novel protein therapeutics and can readily be modified to include further target analytes., (© 2017 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.)

Aims: To assess real-world effectiveness and safety of intravenous (IV) HX575, a biosimilar epoetin-α, in hemodialysis (HD) patients., Materials and Methods: This prospective, observational, pharmacoepidemiological study of adult HD patients treated with IV HX575 for renal anemia for up to 24 months was conducted in 114 centers in 10 European countries. Of 2,086 enrolled subjects (safety sample), 2,023 had ≥ 1 follow-up visit (effectiveness sample)., Results: Most (59.3%) patients were male, median age was 68 years. At enrollment, most (82.5%) had been treated with an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, and 73.0% had adequate iron stores. At baseline, mean (± standard deviation) baseline hemoglobin (Hb) was 11.09 (± 1.14) g/dL and HX575 dose 106.5 (± 78.7) international units (IU)/kg/week; at month 24, Hb was 11.25 (± 1.19) g/dL and HX575 dose 113.0 (± 102.5) IU/kg/week. Variations in mean HX575 dose and Hb over the study were not statistically significant. As to safety, 140 patients (6.7%) experienced ≥ 1 adverse event; of these, 19 events (16 patients; 0.8%) were related to HX575 treatment, 148 (108 patients; 5.2%) were reported as serious, including 12 events in 11 patients (0.5%) stated to be related. No cases of anti-epoetin antibodies or pure red cell aplasia were reported., Conclusions: MONITOR-CKD5 confirmed the real-world effectiveness and safety profile of IV biosimilar HX575. HD patients treated for up to 24 months showed stable dosing patterns and Hb outcomes. The safety profile of HX575 is likewise comparable to reference epoetin-α.
.

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, such as recombinant human erythropoietin, are commonly used for the treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). In 2007, HX575 (Binocrit ® ) became the first biosimilar epoetin alfa to be approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The decision to approve a biosimilar is based on the totality of evidence obtained in a comprehensive comparability exercise that involves extensive analytical characterization, nonclinical studies and clinical studies. The development process for HX575 included extensive analytical characterization and comparison with the reference epoetin alfa. This was followed by a clinical development program, comprising Phase I pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies to show bioequivalence to the reference medicine and a confirmatory Phase III study to demonstrate therapeutic effectiveness in anemia related to CKD. In addition to the comparability exercises, extensive clinical experience over the last decade also confirms that HX575 provides an effective treatment for CKD-related anemia, with a favorable safety profile. Growing clinical experience with EMA-approved biosimilars, including HX575, should offer additional reassurance to health care professionals and patients that these agents are as effective and well tolerated as others in the therapeutic class., Competing Interests: Disclosure FD, DG, and CC have served as advisors to Sandoz (study Steering Committee members). AK and AS are employees of Sandoz International GmbH/Hexal AG. NH was an employee of Sandoz International GmbH/Hexal AG at the time of writing. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Background: It is unknown whether early intervention with low-dose erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in non-anaemic patients delays progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD)., Methods: In a single-blind, 24-month trial, adults with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 30–59 mL/min/1.73 m2 and either Type 2 diabetes mellitus or previous kidney transplantation were randomized to low-dose continuous erythropoiesis receptor activator (CERA; monthly dose 30–75 µg; n = 115) or placebo (n = 120). The primary endpoint was the annual change in eGFR (abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula)., Results: Mean (standard deviation) eGFR was 40.7 (9.8) mL/min/1.73 m2 versus 39.8 (9.2) mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline for CERA and placebo, respectively, and 39.0 (11.6) g/dL versus 39.7 (10.6) g/dL at the final visit. The median (interquartile range) annual reduction in eGFR was 0.5 (−2.2, 3.8) mL/min/1.73 m2 with CERA versus 0.4 (−2.0, 3.2) mL/min/1.73 m2 with placebo (P = 0.657). No significant difference in the annual change in eGFR was observed between treatment groups in the subpopulations with Type 2 diabetes or kidney transplant. Adverse events with a suspected relation to study drug occurred in 22.0% and 16.2% of patients randomized to CERA or placebo, respectively, and adverse events led to study drug discontinuation in 11.0% and 8.5% of patients., Conclusions: Patients with moderate CKD and Type 2 diabetes or previous kidney transplantation showed stable renal function that was unaffected by administration of low-dose ESA. In addition, there was no clinically meaningful effect of 2-year low-dose ESA treatment on albuminuria, an important surrogate marker of kidney injury., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Hemodialysis (HD) per se entails vascular dysfunction in patients with ESRD. Endothelial dysfunction is a key step in atherosclerosis and is characterized by impaired flow-mediated dilation (FMD). Interventional studies have shown that cocoa flavanol (CF)-rich supplements improve vascular function. Aim of this study was to investigate the effect of flavanol-rich bioactive food ingredients on acute and chronic HD-induced vascular dysfunction in ESRD., Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial from 2012 to 2013. Fifty-seven participants were enrolled, ingested CF-rich beverages (900 mg CF per study day), and were compared with those ingesting CF-free placebo. This included (1) a baseline cross-over acute study to determine safety and efficacy of CF and (2) a subsequent chronic parallel group study with a 30-day follow-up period to study effects of CF on HD-mediated vascular dysfunction entailing (3) an acute substudy during HD in flavanol-naive patients and (4) an acute on chronic study during HD. Primary and secondary outcome measures included changes in FMD and hemodynamics., Results: CF ingestion was well tolerated. Acute ingestion improved FMD by 53% (3.2±0.6% to 4.8±0.9% versus placebo, 3.2±0.7% to 3.3±0.8%; P<0.001), with no effects on BP or heart rate. A 30-day ingestion of CF led to an increase in baseline FMD by 18% (3.4±0.9% to 3.9±0.8% versus placebo, 3.5±0.7% to 3.5±0.7%; P<0.001), with reduced diastolic BP (73±12 to 69±11 mmHg versus placebo, 70±11 to 73±13 mmHg; P=0.03) and increased heart rate (70±12 to 74±13 bpm versus placebo, 75±15 to 74±13 bpm; P=0.01). No effects were observed for placebo. Acute ingestion of CF during HD alleviated HD-induced vascular dysfunction (3.4±0.9% to 2.7±0.6% versus placebo, 3.5±0.7% to 2.0±0.6%; P<0.001). This effect was sustained throughout the study (acute on chronic, 3.9±0.9% to 3.0±0.7% versus placebo, 3.5±0.7% to 2.2±0.6; P=0.01)., Conclusions: Dietary CF ingestion mitigates acute HD-induced and chronic endothelial dysfunction in patients with ESRD and thus, improves vascular function in this high-risk population. Larger clinical trials are warranted to test whether this translates into an improved cardiovascular prognosis in patients with ESRD., (Copyright © 2016 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

The analysis of low-molecular-mass peptides in doping controls has become a mandatory aspect in sports drug testing and, thus, the number of samples that has to be tested for these analytes has been steadily increasing. Several peptides <2 kDa with performance-enhancing properties are covered by the list of prohibited substances of the World Anti-Doping Agency including Desmopressin, LH-RH, Buserelin, Triptorelin, Leuprolide, GHRP-1, GHRP-2, GHRP-3, GHRP-4, GHRP-5,GHRP-6, Alexamorelin, Ipamorelin, Hexarelin, ARA-290, AOD-9604, TB-500 and Anamorelin. With the presented method employing direct urine injection into a liquid chromatograph followed by ion-mobility time-of-flight mass spectrometry, a facile, specific and sensitive assay for the aforementioned peptidic compounds is provided. The accomplished sensitivity allows for limits of detection between 50 and 500 pg/mL and thus covers the minimum required performance level of 2 ng/mL accordingly. The method is precise (imprecision <20%) and linear in the estimated working range between 0 and 10 ng/mL. The stability of the peptides in urine was tested, and -20°C was found to be the appropriate storage temperature for sports drug testing. Finally, proof-of-concept was shown by analysing elimination study urine samples collected from individuals having administered GHRP-6, GHRP-2, or LHRH., (© 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.)

Background: Epoetin-zeta (epoetin-ζ) (sold as Retacrit™/Silapo™) is a biologic product that was approved by the European Medicines Agency in 2007 after demonstrating biosimilarity to its reference product epoetin-α (Eprex™), based on a comprehensive comparability exercise including extensive biophysical characterization and three double-blind randomized controlled trials. Since 2008, epoetin-ζ has been prescribed by physicians across Europe to treat anemia of renal disease in many thousands of patients., Methods: Provided here are results of the PASCO I study (post-authorization safety cohort observation of silapo/retacrit (epoetin-ζ) administered intravenously for the treatment of renal anemia). The primary study endpoint was the frequency of adverse events of special interest (AESI) occurring in patients receiving epoetin-ζ over a 1-year study observation period., Results: The safety set included 1,634 patients who received at least 1 dose of epoetin-ζ during the study period. These patients experienced AESI at these frequencies: clotting of artificial kidney 9.8%, lack of efficacy 2.3%, cerebrovascular events (including cerebrovascular accident, cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, and transient ischemic attack) 1.8%, myocardial infarction 1.7%, acute myocardial infarction 1.2%, clinically relevant hyperkalemia 0.4%, deep vein thrombosis 0.2%, convulsion 0.2%, hypertensive encephalopathy 0.1%, and pulmonary embolism 0.1%. No patients were reported as having anaphylactoid reactions, angioedema, erythropoietinneutralizing antibodies, or pure red cell aplasia. The median weekly follow-up dose of epoetin-ζ was 158.6 IU/kg. Mean hemoglobin concentration ranged between 11.3 and 11.7 g/dL. From the safety set, 228 patients died (14.0%), while 1,135 patients (74.9%; excluding 119 with data missing) continued treatment with epoetin-ζ following the 12-month observation., Conclusion: The PASCO I study contributes significantly to current knowledge about the frequency of adverse events associated with the use of epoetin-ζ for the treatment of renal anemia and demonstrates a pattern of adverse events comparable with data for other existing epoetin products in Europe.

Purpose: Data from an ongoing European pharmacoepidemiological study (MONITOR-CKD5) were used to examine congruence between physician-reported risk-based individualisation of target haemoglobin (Hb) and the actual Hb targets set by these physicians for their patients, as well as actual Hb levels in their patients., Methods: Physician investigators participating in the study completed a questionnaire about their anaemia practice patterns and attitudes post-TREAT at the start of the study (T1) and in summer 2013 (T2). These data were compared with the Hb targets identified at baseline for actual patients (n = 1197) enrolled in the study. Risk groups included presence/absence of hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular complications, history of stroke, history of cancer, and age/activity level (elderly/inactive or young/active)., Results: At each time point, more than three quarters of physicians responded that results from the TREAT study, in patients not on dialysis, have influenced their use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients on haemodialysis. At T1, there was a clear difference in physician-reported (theoretical) target Hb levels for patients across the different risk groups, but there was no difference in patients' actual Hb levels across the risk groups. A similar disparity was noted at T2., Conclusions: Physicians' theoretical attitudes to anaemia management in patients on haemodialysis appear to have been influenced by the results of the TREAT study, which involved patients not on dialysis. Physicians claim to use risk-based target Hb levels to guide renal anaemia care. However, there is discrepancy between these declared risk-based target Hb levels and actual target Hb levels for patients with variable risk factors.

Aim: While darbepoetin alfa (DA) can be administered once monthly (QM) to maintain haemoglobin (Hb) concentrations in anaemic patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis (CKD-ND), the QM use of DA for anaemia correction has not been previously investigated., Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority, active-controlled study, adult subjects with CKD-ND, Hb levels <10 g/dL, and not treated with an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent were randomized 1:1 to receive DA every 2 weeks (Q2W) or QM for 33 weeks with initial doses of 0.75 μg/kg Q2W or 1.5 μg/kg QM. Subjects were treated to target Hb levels of 10-12 g/dL and ≥1 g/dL increase from baseline. The primary end-point was Hb change between baseline and the evaluation period (weeks 29-33), with a non-inferiority margin of -0.5 g/dL., Results: Three hundred and fifty-five subjects received ≥1 dose of DA. Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) change in Hb between baseline and the evaluation period was 2.16 (1.98-2.33) g/dL for the Q2W group and 1.97 (1.80-2.14) g/dL for the QM group, the mean (95% CI) difference in Hb change being -0.19 (-0.43 to 0.05) g/dL. Most subjects (97.9% Q2W; 98.1% QM) achieved a Hb level ≥10.0 g/dL and ≥1.0 g/dL increase in Hb from baseline. Mean DA (SD) weekly equivalent doses over the evaluation period were 0.20 (0.23) and 0.27 (0.31) μg/kg per week for the Q2W and QM groups, respectively. Safety profiles were similar between groups., Conclusion: In subjects with CKD-ND, QM dosing was non-inferior to Q2W dosing for anaemia correction and had a similar safety profile., (© 2014 Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology.)

Background: This study compared the effects of short-term titrated colestilan (a novel non-absorbable, non-calcium, phosphate binder) with placebo, and evaluated the safety and efficacy of colestilan over 1 year compared with sevelamer, in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) 5D., Methods: This prospective multicentre study comprised a 4-week phosphate binder washout period, a 16-week short-term, flexible-dose, treatment period (including a 4-week placebo-controlled withdrawal period) and a 40-week extension treatment phase., Results: At Week 16 (the end of the 4-week placebo-controlled withdrawal period), serum phosphorus level was 0.43 mmol/L (1.32 mg/dL) lower with colestilan than placebo (P < 0.001; primary end point). Serum LDL-C level was also lower with colestilan than with placebo (P < 0.001). Both colestilan and sevelamer produced significant reductions from baseline in serum phosphorus levels (P < 0.001), maintained for 1 year, and the proportion of patients achieving target levels of ≤1.78 mmol/L (5.5 mg/dL) or ≤1.95 mmol/L (6.0 mg/dL) at study end were similar (65.3 and 73.3%, respectively, for colestilan, and 66.9 and 77.4%, respectively, for sevelamer). Serum calcium level remained stable in the colestilan group but tended to increase slightly in the sevelamer group (end-of-study increase of 0.035 mmol/L over baseline). Both binders produced similar reductions from baseline in LDL-C level (P < 0.001), and responder rates after 1 year, using a target of <1.83 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) or <2.59 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) were similar in both groups (50.7 and 85.3% for colestilan and 54.0 and 80.6% for sevelamer). Colestilan was generally well tolerated., Conclusions: Colestilan is effective and safe for the treatment of hyperphosphataemia in patients with CKD 5D, and affords similar long-term phosphorus and cholesterol reductions/responder rates to sevelamer.

Background and Objectives: Few randomized controlled trials have compared intravenous iron products head to head in CKD patients with iron deficiency anemia. This study compared the efficacy and safety of two intravenous iron products (ferumoxytol [Feraheme injection] and iron sucrose [Venofer]) in patients with CKD and iron deficiency anemia., Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements: In this phase II, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multicenter clinical trial, patients were randomized 1:1 to either 1.02 g ferumoxytol (2 × 510-mg injections) or 1.0 g iron sucrose administered as either a slow injection or infusion (10 doses for dialysis patients and 5 doses for nondialysis patients). Inclusion criteria included hemoglobin<11.0 g/dl, transferrin saturation<30%, and eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) or a diagnosis of underlying CKD (e.g., nephropathy or nephritis). The primary end point was change in hemoglobin from baseline to week 5., Results: In total, 162 patients were randomized. Demographics were balanced between the treatment groups. Adverse event profiles of the two regimens were fairly similar: overall adverse events, 48% ferumoxytol versus 65% iron sucrose; related adverse events, 10% ferumoxytol versus 16% iron sucrose; and adverse events leading to study discontinuation, 1% ferumoxytol versus 5% iron sucrose. Rates of serious adverse events and related serious adverse events were similar between the ferumoxytol and iron sucrose groups: serious adverse events, 9% versus 7%, respectively and related serious adverse events, 1% versus 1%, respectively. Overall, increases in hemoglobin were similar between treatment groups. Based on an ANOVA model adjusted for baseline hemoglobin level and dialysis status, the least squares mean change from baseline to week 5 was 0.8 ± 0.1 g/dl in the ferumoxytol-treated group and 0.7 ± 0.1 g/dl in the iron sucrose group. The difference in the mean change from baseline between the two treatment groups was 0.1 g/dl (95% confidence interval, -0.2 to 0.4)., Conclusion: In this randomized, controlled trial, ferumoxytol and iron sucrose showed comparable efficacy and adverse events rates.

The incidence of diabetes mellitus type 2 is greatly increasing worldwide. An early therapy with intensified control of diabetes and blood pressure is especially important to avoid delayed complications. In addition to diabetic foot syndrome, diabetic retinopathy and diabetic nephropathy still represent commonly occurring problems. Despite improvements in the quality of care, the targets of the St. Vincent Declaration have still not yet been achieved. Diabetic retinopathy and diabetic nephropathy show parallels in the course of the disease and in the pathological anatomical alterations which have led to the inauguration of a diabetic renal-retinal syndrome. The ophthalmological assessment of the retina was previously considered to be a diagnostic aid for assessment of diabetic nephropathy; however, nowadays a simple estimation of the glomerular filtration rate using the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula and determination of microalbuminuria can in contrast give ophthalmologists an early indication of the possible presence of microangiopathic alterations.

Background: Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) show a high prevalence of cardiovascular disease with arterial stiffness, atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The cytokine macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) exhibits proinflammatory and proatherogenic functions and has recently emerged as a major regulator of atherogenesis. Studies examining the relationship between circulating MIF levels and vascular dysfunction in this high-risk population do not exist., Methods: In patients with ESRD (n = 39) and healthy controls (n = 16) we assessed endothelial function by flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery and arterial stiffness (augmentation pressure, augmentation index and pulse pressure) using applanation tonometry. High-sensitive Troponin and subendocardial viability ratio were determined to assess myocardial injury., Results: Patients with ESRD had impaired endothelial function and higher plasma MIF levels. MIF levels negatively correlated with endothelial function (r = -0.345, P = 0.031) and positively with arterial stiffness indices in patients with ESRD (pulse pressure r = -0.374, P = 0.019 and augmentation pressure r = -0.423, P = 0.025). In multivariate regression models besides age, gender, weight, and heart rate, MIF was an independent predictor for arterial stiffness. Impact on myocardial end-organ damage was reflected by correlation with high-sensitive Troponin I (r = 0.43, P = 0.009)., Conclusion: Our findings show that high MIF plasma levels are associated with diminished endothelial function and arterial stiffness and are correlated with myocardial injury. Further studies are necessary to investigate whether modulation of MIF might have an impact on atherosclerotic disease in this high-risk population., (© 2013.)

Prior longitudinal observational studies have examined the practice patterns and outcomes of anaemia management, including the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). Several dimensions of effectiveness remain unaddressed; especially considering the revised ESA label (target Hb levels between 10 and 12 g/dL), the recently published TREAT study, and the European approval of the first ESA biosimilar (HX575). Anecdotal evidence suggests that patient outcomes are influenced by physician-related variables and whether anaemia management is congruent with practice guidelines, but this has not been studied systematically. MONITOR-CKD5 is an international, prospective, observational, pharmacoepidemiological study evaluating the multi-level factors and outcomes of treatment with HX575 for renal anaemia in haemodialysis patients. Driven by a novel, integrated, multi-focal framework for post-approval observational studies, it examines determinants of response at both the patient and the physician level; integrates an advocated statistical methodology here to fore used mainly in the social and behavioural sciences; assesses factors potentially predictive of a poor treatment response; and evaluates the extent to which treatment is congruent with evidence-based guidelines, good practice evidence, and the revised ESA label. This pan-European study will recruit at least 1,000 patients from a minimum of 75 centres, and follow them for up to 24 months following initiation of anaemia management with biosimilar epoetin alfa. MONITOR-CKD5 will not only study the core issues addressed by prior observational studies but also aims to take knowledge discovery a step further by assessing outcomes across varying cohorts of patients, and examining the impact of evidence-based practice on clinical outcomes, differentiating, in the process, between physician-level and patient-level determinants.

Objective: This time-and-motion study aimed to quantify healthcare personnel time associated with routine anemia-management tasks for maintenance therapy with C.E.R.A. (continuous erythropoietin receptor activator) that treats anemia with once-monthly injections versus other erythropoiesis-stimulating agents ('Other ESAs'), including shorter-acting ESAs (epoetin alfa, epeotin beta) and darbepoetin alfa., Methods and Design: This was a non-interventional, observational study where patients were treated for anemia according to individual center practices. Time taken to complete frequent anemia-management tasks for both groups (C.E.R.A. vs. 'Other ESAs') was recorded and potential annual time savings per patient and per center following assumed 100% uptake of C.E.R.A. once monthly were estimated., Results: For 'Other ESAs', the average total time spent per patient per year on frequent anemia management-related tasks ranged from 48 minutes in Spain to 265 minutes in Poland. For C.E.R.A. once monthly, the average total time spent per patient per year ranged from 12 minutes in Spain to 39 minutes in Poland, a reduction in actual time spent of 76-89% versus 'Other ESAs'. 100% adoption of C.E.R.A. once monthly may result in average annual time savings of 26-553 hours, a reduction of 67-95% depending on center size and frequency distribution of 'Other ESAs'., Limitations: Due to variability in treatment practices between centers (differences in task, description and frequency distribution of 'Other ESAs') and the small numbers of centers participating in each country, it is difficult to generalize annual per patient time results to reflect each country. Per center results should be interpreted with caution as they were derived based on specific center sizes that may not reflect typical center sizes in the country., Conclusions: Adoption of C.E.R.A. once monthly could offer substantial time savings on frequent anemia management-related tasks versus 'Other ESAs'; allowing re-allocation of scarce resources to other aspects of patient care.

Aims: To assess the treatment efficacy and tolerability of lanthanum carbonate (LC) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and hyperphosphatemia under daily-practice conditions., Patients and Methods: 698 patients on dialysis in 116 outpatient dialysis centers in Germany were enrolled in this post-marketing surveillance study (mean treatment duration 6 months). LC treatment was compared to pretreatment (no or other phosphate binders) regarding laboratory parameters, adverse events and tablet burden., Results: Compared to baseline, LC significantly reduced mean serum phosphate (SP), serum calcium, and calcium × phosphate product (p < 0.0001). In monotherapy with LC, mean tablet burden was decreased to 3.0 tablets per day thus reducing the mean pre-study phosphatebinder tablet burden by nearly 50%. Adverse drug reactions associated with LC were reported in only 2.0% of the patients (n = 14). Overall, LC was considered safe and well tolerated., Conclusions: Under daily-practice conditions, LC at an average dose of 2,509 ± 936 mg/d was well tolerated and effective in adjusting and maintaining control of SP in patients previously being unsatisfactorily controlled on other phosphate binders. The daily tablet burden with a phosphate binder can be reduced to 3 tablets of LC, particularly in patients on monotherapy. The lack of a comparison group should be considered in terms of careful interpretation of the study results.

Background: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and advanced kidney disease are usually treated with insulin. However, the prolonged pharmacokinetic insulin profile in patients with delayed renal insulin elimination impairs a successful therapy. Due to its hepatic metabolism, pioglitazone is a potential candidate for additional administration. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of pioglitazone versus placebo on total daily insulin requirements and several pleiotropic factors in type 2 diabetes patients requiring hemodialysis., Methods: The effect of pioglitazone (30 mg) versus placebo was explored in this prospective, randomized, double-blind parallel multicenter phase II study analyzing data from 36 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus currently under hemodialysis (25 male, 11 female, aged 69.2 ± 7.9 years, baseline HbA1c 7.6 ± 0.9%). The most important efficacy parameters collected before dialysis and after an overnight fast at baseline and after 6 months were: total daily insulin dose, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, adiponectin, HDL, LDL, triglycerides, NT-proBNP, and ultrafiltrate volume., Results: Application of pioglitazone resulted in a significant decrease of the daily insulin dose by 35% versus baseline (placebo: -10%, n.s.), improvement in HbA1c (-0.60 ± 0.87%, p = 0.015; placebo: 0.21 ± 1.1%, n.s.) and adiponectin (7.33 ± 4.80 mg/l, p < 0.001; placebo: -1.37 ± 2.56 mg/l, n.s.). Slight improvements or no changes were seen with fasting glucose, triglycerides, HDL, LDL and NT-proBNP. There was no indication of increased hypoglycemia risk and volume overload by the addition of pioglitazone., Conclusions: Addition of pioglitazone to insulin in patients with late-stage kidney failure requiring hemodialysis is a well-tolerated treatment option that improves glycemic control with simultaneous insulin-sparing potential.

Once-monthly administration of CERA, a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, has shown equivalent efficacy to shorter-acting erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) that require more frequent dosing, but data on routine use of once-monthly CERA in hemodialysis patients are lacking. Study on Efficacy, Safety and Applicability of Mircera (SESAM) was a prospective, multicenter, noninterventional trial with a duration of up to 9 months (month 0-5 "titration phase"; month 6-8 "evaluation phase") to test the stability of Hb control in hemodialysis patients under routine conditions. Patient selection, Hb targets and CERA dosing were at the discretion of the local nephrologist. 918 patients from 92 German nephrology centers were included. Ninety-three percent were on ESA treatment prior to study entry. The mean number of CERA dose changes during the study was 1.9 ± 1.9 per patient. Mean Hb level was 11.4 ± 1.2 g/dL at baseline and 11.7 ± 1.4 g/dL at the end of the 8-month study. During the evaluation phase (months 6-8), 15.6%, 40.3%, and 66.0% of patients had stable Hb (i.e., at least two values) in the ranges 11-12, 10-12, and 10-13 g/dL, respectively. The mean intra-individual fluctuation in Hb was 1.4 ± 0.7 g/dL during the study (0.5 ± 0.4 g/dL during the 3-month evaluation phase). More than 90% of patients, and > 80% of physicians, rated CERA therapy as "very good" or "good" throughout the study. Four patients (0.4%) discontinued prematurely due to adverse drug reactions. Once-monthly CERA therapy maintains stable Hb values with low intra-individual variability and few dose adaptations in hemodialysis patients when administered entirely according to local practice, and the regimen was well-tolerated.