Search

The article focuses on recent judicial developments in criminal law in Minnesota, U.S. It covers key issues including the requirement for prima facie evidence of mental illness for asserting a mental illness defense, the conditions under which a probationary sentence may be executed, the scope of immunity under the Good Samaritan Act, and the admissibility of alternate perpetrator evidence.

The article discusses legal cases, which include a restitution order where the definition of "resources" in restitution orders includes valuable possessions like home equity; the inapplicability of the physician-patient privilege to paramedics; and the refusal to extend the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule in Fourth Amendment cases to violations of Minnesota's constitution, despite its application in federal jurisprudence.

The article discusses legal cases covers various topics within the realm of criminal law, including restitution, postconviction proceedings, juvenile jurisdiction, firearms offenses, criminal sexual conduct, and harassment. It presents different legal issues and interpretations of statutes, highlighting the complexities of the legal system and the importance of legal precedent in shaping outcomes.

The article discusses two criminal law cases includes two main aspects. It addresses the restitution issue, emphasizing that the court is not obliged to consider collateral sources when calculating restitution for a murder conviction. It delves into Fourth Amendment matters related to probable cause for a vehicle search based on information from a reliable informant.

The article provides a concise summary of three judicial decisions pertaining to criminal law cases. It outlines the key legal issues addressed in each case, including sentencing enhancements based on prior convictions, the enforcement of plea agreements, and the preservation of the presumption of innocence during trial proceedings. It highlights the legal principles and outcomes involved, providing insight into recent developments in criminal law jurisprudence.

The article offers information on several U.S. court cases related to criminal law; labor law; and family law. The cases discussed include State v. Beganovic related to state must prove a fire was started without authorization for arson; Hennepin HealthCare System, Inc. v. AFSCME on violation of collective bargaining agreements for arbitration award and Buckner v. Robichaud on award of attorneys' fees through the court's inherent authority.

The article focuses on various topics related to criminal law in Minnesota. Topics include conviction of a person driving recklessly with passengers hanging from a car as second-degree riot, considering the car as a dangerous weapon, and the discretion of the district court in revoking probation despite a joint recommendation for its continuation.

The article focuses on recent developments in Minnesota's judicial law, legislation, and administrative actions. It also include a case involving the definition of "shoplifting gear" in criminal law, the right to counsel in recorded phone calls, the enforceability of traffic laws on private property, the burden of proof in competency proceedings, the appeal ability of dismissal orders based on probable cause and the requirement of proving a defendant's ability to pay restitution.

The article discusses various legal cases related to criminal law in Minnesota. It covers topics such as jurisdiction over cases involving juvenile offenders, the right to counsel, self-defense, restitution, distracted driving, and ineffective assistance of counsel. It is further reported that these cases address important legal issues and their implications within the criminal justice system in Minnesota.

The article focuses on the legal implications and constitutional validity of geofence warrants under the Fourth Amendment. It examines a specific case where such a warrant was used to gather evidence linking a suspect's cellphone to a crime scene. Key points discussed include the court's ruling that geofence warrants are not inherently unconstitutional but must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

The article discusses about legal developments in judicial law, legislation, and administrative action in Minnesota. It includes uncorroborated admission to possession of marijuana, a child's level of participation in planning and committing the aggravated robbery and circumstantial evidence standard of review.

The article discusses various legal cases, including indecent exposure, escape from custody, and criminal sexual conduct, highlighting interpretations of statutes and legal principles by the Minnesota Court of Appeals. It addresses issues such as the definition of "private parts" in indecent exposure cases, the intent requirement in escape from custody trials, and the definition of "force" in criminal sexual conduct cases.

The article reports that the Minnesota Supreme Court held that a defendant's confrontation rights were not violated when a witness testified via Zoom during a trial held during the COVID-19 pandemic. Topics include considered the court applied the test set forth in Maryland v. Craig, which allows for remote testimony if it is necessary to further an important public policy and the reliability of the testimony is otherwise assured.

The article offers information on several U.S. Court case related to criminal, labor and intellectual property laws. Topics discussed include State v. Modtland on parole eligibility determination which does not implicate a guilty plea's intelligence; Placzek v. Mayo Clinic on claims of whistleblower as independent contractor not covered and Gould v. Brown Cty. on mistakes of law in copyright registrations which are eligible for safe harbor.

The article analyzes current developments in judicial law, legislation and administrative action in Minnesota. It is noted that district court properly denied request for downward durational departure for second-degree intentional murder in a case after appellant pleaded guilty to second degree intentional murder for shooting and killing a man after a verbal argument and physical altercation at a mall.

The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. courts in the cases related to criminal law. Topics discussed include State v. Jackson on commencement of new jury trials due to covid-19 and felony violation; State v. Fugalli on offer to sell a prohibited amount of a controlled substance with heroin on those four occasions; and State v. Irby on provisions of the wrongfully obtaining assistance statute.

The article focuses on several U.S. court cases related to criminal law. Topics discussed include State v. Jackson on proper remedy for public trial violation for guilty of second-degree intentional murder; State v. Epps on no manifest injustice requiring withdrawal of guilty plea when defendant is not questioned about uncontested previous convictions and State v. Hassan on Mandatory life sentence without the possibility of parole is not unconstitutionally cruel for 21-year-old convicted.

The article discusses about various criminal court cases. The cases includes State v. Hatch in which Permit to carry statute does not violate 2nd Amendment, State v. Powers on Property damage: "Cost of repair or replacement" includes reasonable estimates and Aili v. State where two-year time limit runs from date new retroactive rule of law is announced.

The article informs about several court cases with emergent trends in criminal law and legal profession for the complete Minnesota lawyer. Topics include court case Johnston v. State, claims for misdemeanor domestic assault, the state dismissed a charge of gross misdemeanor malicious punishment of a child, as well as adjudication of the domestic assault charge; and court case State v. Zaldivar-Proenza, which claims for fourth- and fifth-degree criminal sexual conduct.

The article delves into multiple legal cases, each highlighting distinct aspects of the law. It starts by examining the complex matter of probation revocation, particularly in cases where defendants repeatedly violate probation conditions, notably when it involves contact with minors after convictions for criminal sexual conduct. It also discusses a fourth Amendment issue concerning the search of an impounded vehicle that initially led to the discovery of controlled substances.

The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. courts in the cases related to criminal law. Topics discussed include State v. Jonsgaard on guilty of check forgery by false endorsement for writing 18 checks; State v. Epps on force or coercion" in first-degree criminal sexual conduct statute establishes alternative means of committing element of offense; and Jensen v. 1985 Ferrari on vehicle forfeiture on ignition interlock program must be enrolled with the vehicle.

The article focuses on the decision of the Minnesota Courts in the cases related to criminal law. Topics discussed include State v. Gibson on traffic violation of failure to make a complete stop before entering intersection; Roberts v. State on fifth-degree controlled substance juvenile delinquency adjudication does not qualify as a crime of violence and State v. Wilde on warrant misidentifying person to be searched.

The article focuses on several Minnesota Court cases related to criminal law. Topics discussed include In re Program to Aid Victims of Sexual Assault on order for subpoena is necessary to obtain privileged records from rape crisis counseling center; State v. Schwartz on operator knew controlled substance was in his body is not required; and State v. Vangrevenhof on post-arrest statement to police about purchase of drugs from defendant is admissible under residual exception to hearsay rule.

The article discusses ruling of the Minnesota Supreme Court in several cases including State v. Tomlinson, State v. Casillas and State v. Thompson. Topics discusses include to avoid revealing an arrest warrant during a traffic stop appellant Dakota James-Burcham Thompson identified himself to police as Dakota James Burcham, charges of first-degree and second-degree criminal sexual conduct on appellant; and charges of felony nonconsensual dissemination of private sexual images on appellant.

The article focuses on developments in judicial law, legislation, and administrative action in Minnesota. It includes punishment of life imprisonment requiring prosecution by indictment, racketeering and aiding and abetting theft by swindle and permitting a child to ingest meth without the knowledge of the child's age.

The article discusses few developments in judicial law, legislation, and administrative action in Minnesota concerning criminal law, as of October 2019. Several court cases discussed include "State v. Scheffler" on request to waive filing fee is governed by expungement statute; "State v. Rosenbush" related to right to counsel; and "State v. Boettcher" concerning restitution for losses.

The article offers information on current developments in criminal law. Topics discussed include multiple sentences allowed for violating Order for Protection's no-contact provision as to multiple protected persons in the case State v. Alger; interfere with privacy when entering property of another not required in the case State v. Pakhnyuk; and transfer of cannabis oil from one wholly owned subsidiary of parent company to another as a transfer to another person in the case State v. Owens.

The article discusess several U.S. criminal law court cases. Topics discussed include State v. Lagred court case on robbery; Johnson v. State court case on criminal procedure for guilty plea entered in consideration of unlawful sentence is coerced; and Olson v. One 1999 Lexus court case on forfeiture of vehicle.

The article highlights decision of few Minnesota courts in cases related to criminal law, as of April 2019. Several cases discussed include "Jonathan Edward Buhl v. State," related to Minnesota Imprisonment and Exoneration Remedies Act; "State v. Brett Michael Wood" on the issue that arise when police permitted to execute search warrant for blood test over driver's objection when police did not read implied consent advisory; and "State v. John Lee Bowen" related to robbery.

The article offers information on several Minnesota court cases related to criminal law. Topics discussed include Moore v. State on impeachment evidence is misused if the party who called a witness was aware the witness would recant before the witness took the stand; Hagerman v. State which applies retroactively to challenges of final convictions for test pleaded guilty to third-degree test refusal and State v. Andersen on harassment restraining order requires proof of knowledge of facts.

The article focuses on the U.S. court case related to criminal law. Topics discussed include State v. Branch on pleading guilty to drive-by shooting at an occupied vehicle and second-degree assault of a victim outside the vehicle for sentencing; State v. Leonard on hotel registry is a search that must be supported by a reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity for search and seizure and McCormick v. Comm'r of Pub. Safety on implied consent for judicial review.

The article focuses on decision of Minnesota court cases related to criminal law. The case discussed include Bergman v. Caulk on federal "expungement" requirement for reinstatement of right to carry firearms, Tapia v. Leslie on amendment removing theft of motor vehicle from list of crimes of violence does not apply retroactively to lift appellant's lifetime ban on possessing a firearm and Birkland v. Comm'r Pub. Safety on traffic law.

The article highlights developments in judicial law, legislation, and administrative action through some cases held in Minnesota, as of October 2018. Several cases discussed include "OCC LLC v. County of Hennepin" affirming timely removal of assigned judge; "Sorchaga v. Ride Auto LLC" related to commercial and consumer law; and "State v. Jeremy Brian Roy" on criminal provision of Interstate agreement on detainers.

The article reports some decisions of courts in Minnesota concerning criminal laws. Several cases discussed includes "State v. Mohamed Musa Jama" related to involuntary intoxication; "State v. Traci Rankin Bradley" concerning search and seizure laws; and "Jetaun Helen Wheeler v. State" about District court's participation in plea negotiations.

The article discusess various court cases. Topics discussed include State v. Molnau court case addressing execution of a search warrant while searching of guest's purse; Wright v. Byron Financial, LLC court case addressing employment contract and law; and State v. A.S.R court case addressing expungement of criminal records.

The article discusses the Minnesota criminal law court cases. Topics discussed include Houck v. Houck court case dealing with Harassment Restraining Order; and State v. Trifiletti court case dealing with confrontation clause in second-degree murder charges in which witness was COVID-19 pandemic positive.

The article presents the discussion on judicial law, legislation, and administrative action together with a foretaste of emergent trends in law. Topics include charging with criminal trespass and adjudication of the delinquency petition being stayed for 180 days following a bench trial; and purpose of both subdivisions protecting treatment facility staff, a legitimate policy goal showing legislative committee discussions showing legislators.

The article focuses on several Minnesota court cases related to criminal law. The case discussed include State v. Travis Clay Andersen regarding the medical report coincidental to criminal investigation under the confrontation clause, State v. Natalie Jonelle Pollard regarding second-degree intentional murder with the jury instructions on self-defense and State v. Berry Alan Willis on the Rules of Evidence do not bapply to restitution hearings.

The article offers insight to various Minnesota criminal law court cases. Topics discussed include State v. Willie James Brown court case addressing guilty plea of battery, robbery, and resisting police in Florida; Justin Alan Kokosh v. $4,657.00 U.S. Currency, et al., case addressing electronic service of demand for judicial determination; and State v. Inez Fern Eide addressing Firearms.

The article offers information on various criminal law cases in Minnesota. Topics discussed include State v. Cyrus Nyakundi Nyagwoka on misdemeanor of domestic assault including the offense of second-degree assault; State v. Lionel Lopez court case on burglary; and State v. Krista Ann Muccio on criminal sexual conduct.

The article presents recent developments in judicial law, legislation for Minnesota lawyer. Topics discussed include State v. Ronald Gene Kremmin court case related to trespass which requires command to leave property and command not to return to property; State v. Matthew Vaughn Diamond court case related to 5th Amendment violation to request DNA sample after invocation of right to remain silent; and State v. Joel Patrick Rodriguez related to restitution hearing.

The article offers several Minnesota court cases related to criminal law. The case discussed include Justin Stephen Ries v. State on warrant requirement does not apply when officer suspects person commit crime as per fourth Amendment, State v. Juan Manuel Ortega-Rodriguez on requirement of proof of sexual penetration with criminal sexual conduct and State v. Michael Allen Franson on conditional release and amended sentencing order.

The article offers information on the decision of the Minnesota Court of Appeals in the cases related to criminal law. The cases discussed include State v. Tate on allowing police officer to testify via Zoom due to his covid-19 exposure did not violate the defendant's right to confrontation and Borth v. Borth on Proof of intent to have a substantial adverse effect on safety, security, or privacy is not required for HRO based on dissemination of private sexual images.

The article reports number of court cases involving criminal law in Minnesota, as of October 2016. Several court cases discussed include "State v. Armando DeLaCruz Jr.," related to criminal procedure; "State v. Olson" concerning good faith requirement under Rule 30.01 for state's voluntary dismissals of tab charges or complaints; and "State v. Timothy John Bakken" related to violation of laws concerning child pornography.

The article offers information on the court decisions related to criminal lawsuit in Minnesota. Topics discussed include need for proving inaccuracy of criminal history score after time for direct appeal has passed in Tramayne Colfred Williams v. State; submitting aggravating sentencing factor to jury in State v. Donyale Damon Gayles; and conditional release term in State v. Everett Overweg.

The article discusess various criminal law court cases. Topics discussed include State v. C.W.N. court case addressing violations of misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor harassment restraining order; State v. Davis court case addressing restitution for funeral expenses; and State v. Melanson court case on domestic assault and theft of a motor vehicle.

The article offers insight to various criminal law court cases. Topics discussed include State v. Christopher Lee Holloway court case addressing criminal sexual conduct; State v. Juanel Anthony Mikulak court case addressing Mens rea for violating predatory offender registration statute; and Juan Antonio Luna-Pliego vs. State of Minnesota court case addressing sentencing under Drug Sentencing Reform Act.

The article offers insight to various criminal law court cases. Topics discussed include State v. Devon Derrick Parker addressing sentencing for intentional murder and shooting; State v. Sarah Beth Janecek addressing disorderly conduct; and State v. Chantel Lynn Carson addressing driving under the influence of 1,1-difluoroethane.

The article focuses on the decision of several Minnesota court in the cases related to criminal law. Topics discussed include State v. Loveless on presence of greater than 0.3 percent concentration of delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is an essential element of unlawful possession of marijuana; State v. Epps on criminal sexual conduct and state shows no substantial prejudice to the defendant and State v. Noor on depraved mind murder does not include conduct of homicide.