Search

Starting from the proposed role of the mirror neuron system in the recognition of the intention underlying the actions of others, an experimental paradigm was implemented to test the role of sailing motor expertise in predicting the outcome of a competitor’s action. It was hypothesized that subjects with experience in sailing would correctly interpret the maneuver performed due to the activation of domain specific motor representations of the same movements and that subjects who practiced a sport different from sailing would perform worse because of the activation of irrelevant motor patterns. For doing so, a series of video clips, in which a professional sailor performed a tack or a feint, have been manipulated so that the video clips would stop at the moment of the dunkin, namely, when the boat acquires speed to tack or continue straight ahead. The task consisted in predicting whether the action following the dunkin was an actual tack or a feint. The performance of 87 subjects, divided into three subgroups (sailors, tennis players, sedentary), was evaluated in terms of accuracy in identifying the sailor’s intentions and correlated to age, gender, manual dominance, education, job, hours spent weekly playing videogames, and experience in playing sports. Results showed that the percentage of correct identifications of the intention to do a tack or feint was the highest in the group of sailors and the lowest in tennis players. An inverse relation between tennis experience and ability in recognizing the sailor’s intention was found in the group of tennis players. Gender, age, manual dominance, education, job, and experience with videogames were not found to be correlated with performance. Findings support the possible implication of the mirror neuron system in maneuver detection in sailing and may be a starting point for the development of psychological training in this sport.

We describe the case of a bilingual patient with persistent symptoms largely, although not fully, consistent with those that are usually reported in Gerstmann's syndrome. Twenty months after a spontaneous primary intracranial hemorrhage, the patient was evaluated with a series of neuropsychological tasks and underwent an MRI investigation based on Diffusion Tensor Imaging probabilistic tractography. The patient suffered from dysgraphia (difficulty in the access to the graphemic representation of letter forms), autotopoagnosia (difficulties in locating body parts on verbal command), right–left confusion (difficulties in localizing right and left side of symmetrical body parts), and number processing/calculation impairments (predominant difficulties on transcoding tasks). Probabilistic tractography revealed a relatively spared superior longitudinal fasciculus and severe damage to the subcortical white matter connecting the angular gyrus with other parietal regions, such as the intraparietal sulcus and the supramarginal gyrus. Within the framework of the contemporary cognitive accounts of Gerstmann's syndrome, the case supports the assumption of an anatomical intraparietal disconnection more than a functional Grundstörung (core impairment).

In this essay, the history of the “Gaia hypothesis” is used as an example for dilemmas in science communication. James Lovelock invented and developed the idea of Gaia, while Lynn Margulis defended it and worked out a “metatheory” according to which scientific data are exaggerated into the image of the Earth as an organism. Heated reactions to Gaia produced different metatheories, arguing that Gaia was a product of ethical and unscientific choices, superimposed on scientific data. The essay defends the metatheoretical definition of Gaia as a “scientific narrative”, a hypotheses-generator which is part of science but works in an inspirational way. The accessibility of a scientific narrative is, at once, the source of its generative power, the hook to involve lay people in science, and the worrying factor for movements of scientists defending science against pseudoscience and other threats