Search

Introduction: Because medication adherence is essential to the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), identifying (1) subgroups at high risk for low medication adherence and (2) modifiable factors potentially contributing to low adherence can impact patient outcomes. This study aims to describe the relationships between anxiety, trust in the provider, quality patient‐provider communication, fatigue, RA knowledge, adverse medication effects, disease activity, RA medications, disease duration, patient satisfaction, and medication intolerance and cluster factors to differentiate RA‐patient subgroups. Methods: This observational study used correlation analysis, linear regression, and cluster analysis with determination decisions based on Schwarz's Bayesian Criterion. Results: Medication adherence was higher in non‐Hispanic, White participants, inversely correlated with disease activity and pain intensity, and positively correlated with trust in the provider. Patient satisfaction was higher among those with a shorter time since diagnosis, and was negatively associated with disease activity, pain intensity and interference, fatigue, and anxiety. It was positively associated with RA knowledge, trust in provider and quality of patient‐provider communication. Medication intolerance differed by disease duration and was positively correlated with disease activity, pain interference, and fatigue. Of the two clusters, Cluster 1 participants had greater medication adherence and patient satisfaction, and lower medication intolerance. They were of higher income, employed, and non‐Hispanic, White persons with a shorter disease duration and lower perceived pain intensity/interference, fatigue, and anxiety. They were more knowledgeable about RA with higher trust in their provider and perceived quality of patient‐provider communication. Discussion/conclusion: A low medication adherence RA‐patient subgroup‐highly affected by social determinants of health and with unique relational and clinical characteristics was identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, research is needed to translate knowledge of vaccine attitudes into strategic interventions aiming to increase vaccine uptake. The current study gleaned formative data on vaccination attitudes among underserved Black populations in the United States, with particular focus on the impact of conversations between Black individuals and medical professionals. Historically, Black Americans have reported mistrust with the American healthcare system, as a result of systemic and systematic mistreatment. The current investigation aimed to better understand Black people's experiences with medical professionals within the novel context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, researchers facilitated community-engaged focus groups and individual interviews to better understand Black individuals' attitudes about COVID-19 vaccine uptake. In partnership with predominantly Black churches and a local university, investigators recruited community members to share their perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic, COVID-19 vaccines, and interactions with the medical community. This insight can be used to strategically design messaging interventions grounded in theories of persuasion to promote vaccination, including boosters, among hesitant Black individuals. This audience insight is useful as individuals who remain hesitant to receive COVID-19 vaccines may require tailored, sophisticated interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Perceived source credibility during crisis situations vary depending on the type of crisis being experienced. In addition, varying types of crises occurring during the same timeframe also affect perceived source credibility The purpose of this study was to identify the factors that influenced varying perceptions in the wake of three crises that occurred in Baton Rouge, Louisiana during the summer of 2016. The crises were two events that involved violence and a natural disaster. Through survey research, perceptions about universities and government agencies as credible sources were examined. Preferred communication channels were also identified. This study includes data specific to several dimensions of perceived source credibility. Key findings show which sources are considered most credible according to the type of crisis being experienced. Findings also include practical implications for effective communication that can be employed in the future., Source credibility is an important factor in information dissemination in times of crises (Westerman, Spence, & Van Der Heide, 2012; Liu, Austin, & Jin, 2011 and Weick, 1995). Credibility--i.e. trust [...]

African Americans' enrollment in health registries is low, negatively affecting their representation in clinical research. Young African Americans are particularly underrepresented. Because medical discoveries are typically based on findings from research that lacks minority representation, new treatments may not be equally effective with members of the African American community. This may further exacerbate health disparities. In this two-phase study, we first collected data from five focus groups to (a) investigate young African Americans' knowledge about and attitudes toward health registries and (b) explore their perceptions about current messages used to recruit participants into health registries. The findings from the first phase of our research showed that participants had limited awareness and understanding of health registries' functions and held negative attitudes toward research participation. In Phase 2, we conducted an experiment to compare the effects of a current message, a new message designed based on the findings from our Phase 1 study, and a control. Results showed mixed findings on the impact of the new targeted message. Based on the findings from both phases of this study, we present and discuss future strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, research is needed to translate knowledge of vaccine attitudes into strategic interventions aimed at increasing vaccine uptake. The current study gleaned formative data on vaccination attitudes among underserved Black populations, which can then be used to strategically design messages grounded in theories of persuasion. The goal is to promote vaccination among hesitant Black populations. Specifically, researchers facilitated community-engaged focus groups and individual interviews to better understand Black individuals' attitudes about COVID-19 vaccine uptake. In partnership with predominantly Black churches and a local university, investigators recruited community members to share their perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccines. This audience insight will be useful as individuals who remain hesitant to receive COVID-19 vaccines may require targeted, sophisticated interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Condom distribution programmes are an important means of preventing sexually transmitted infections (STIs); yet little research has examined their perceived and actual impact on college campuses. Design: Quantitative, cross-sectional study. Setting: Large public university in the Southeastern USA. Method: Approximately 2 months after a campus-wide condom distribution programme began, we utilised intercept surveys with 355 students (68% women; 43% racial/ethnic minorities) to examine their perceptions of the availability, accessibility and acceptability of condoms, and their perceptions and use of the newly installed condom dispensers. Results: Students perceived condoms to be available and accessible on campus after implementation of the condom dispensers. Students had heard about the dispensers from other people (36%), through social media (18%) and the campus newspaper (15%). Most students (71%) had seen the dispensers. Almost one in four students (23%) had taken a condom from the dispensers; among those who were sexually active during the 2 months that the dispensers were available, 33% had used them. More than one-third of students (37%)--and 53% of sexually active students--indicated intentions to use the dispensers in the next 6 months. Multiple regression analysis controlling for age, gender and race revealed that prior condom use, attitudes about the dispensers and comfort with the dispensers were significant predictors of sexually active students' intentions to use the dispensers (p < 0.001). Objective: Condom distribution programmes are an important means of preventing sexually transmitted infections (STIs); yet little research has examined their perceived and actual impact on college campuses. Design: Quantitative, cross-sectional study. Setting: Large public university in the Southeastern USA. Method: Approximately 2 months after a campus-wide condom distribution programme began, we utilised intercept surveys with 355 students (68% women; 43% racial/ethnic minorities) to examine their perceptions of the availability, accessibility and acceptability of condoms, and their perceptions and use of the newly installed condom dispensers. Results: Students perceived condoms to be available and accessible on campus after implementation of the condom dispensers. Students had heard about the dispensers from other people (36%), through social media (18%) and the campus newspaper (15%). Most students (71%) had seen the dispensers. Almost one in four students (23%) had taken a condom from the dispensers; among those who were sexually active during the 2 months that the dispensers were available, 33% had used them. More than one-third of students (37%)--and 53% of sexually active students--indicated intentions to use the dispensers in the next 6 months. Multiple regression analysis controlling for age, gender and race revealed that prior condom use, attitudes about the dispensers and comfort with the dispensers were significant predictors of sexually active students' intentions to use the dispensers (p < 001). Conclusion: Overall, results indicate that over a short time period, this condom distribution programme was successful in reaching students and providing free condoms. Implications for implementing condom distribution programmes on college campuses as well as future directions for research are discussed.

Colorectal cancer in younger adults is more likely to be diagnosed at an advanced stage. Furthermore, younger Black adults are more likely to be diagnosed with and die from colorectal cancer than younger White adults. Given these persistent racial disparities, urgent attention is needed to increase colorectal cancer awareness and information seeking among young Black adults. Guided by the reasoned action approach, the purpose of this study was to identify behavioral, normative, and control beliefs that influence general colorectal cancer information seeking, talking to a healthcare provider about colorectal cancer, and talking to family about cancer history. The sample included N = 194 participants; Mage = 28.00 (SD = 5.48). Thirty-one percent had ever searched for colorectal cancer information. We identified salient educational advantages to seeking information about colorectal cancer and talking to healthcare providers and family members about cancer history. Barriers included fear, misinformation, low priority, inaccessibility of information, and lack of interest or willingness. This is one of the few studies to investigate cancer communication behaviors among young Black adults. The findings can inform interventions to motivate engagement in cancer communication behaviors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Entertainment programming in the United States has long addressed major public health issues. In the present study, we used a culture-centric approach to systematically investigate the role of television storylines in facilitating health-related conversations on social media. In particular, we examined Twitter conversations about sexual and police-involved trauma prompted by portrayals on the fictional television drama Queen Sugar. Guided by the culture-centric model of narratives in health promotion, we classified the tweets (N = 1,671) into four main thematic categories: identification, social proliferation, emotions, and intentions. The analysis also revealed several subthemes, including identification with characters and cultural elements, expressions of pain and joy, information seeking and sharing, and the need to address intergenerational trauma and promote intergenerational conversations. The data suggests that Twitter may provide a vehicle for engaging in difficult conversations. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of the study for mental health communication with Black Americans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Despite research suggesting that parental involvement can affect alcohol involvement among adolescents, few studies have focused on parent-based alcohol prevention strategies among college undergraduates. We report the results of a randomized trial of a parent-based intervention (PBI) in a sample of college freshmen. Method: Across two cohorts, 724 incoming freshman--parent dyads completed baseline assessments and were randomly assigned to PBI or intervention as usual (an alcohol fact sheet for parents). Student follow-up assessments were completed at 4 and 8 months. Results: Two-part latent growth curve modeling was used to test hypothesized intervention effects. Outcome variables were drinks per week (past month), heavy episodic drinking (past 2 weeks), and alcohol-related problems (past 3 months). Over the 8-month follow-up period, PBI had a significant effect on drinks per week but not heavy episodic drinking or alcohol-related problems. Specifically, compared with students in the intervention-as-usual condition, students receiving the PBI were significantly less likely to transition from nondrinker to drinker status and showed less growth in drinking over the freshman year. However, the direct PBI effect on growth was qualified by a PBI x Gender interaction, with probes indicating that the effect applied to women but not men in the PBI condition. Conclusions: This study extends previous research by demonstrating the potential utility for PBIs to decrease the likelihood of transitioning into drinker status and, at least for women, for slowing growth in drinking over the freshman year., PROBLEM DRINKING AMONG college undergraduates is widely recognized as one of the major public health concerns on university campuses nationwide (see O'Malley and Johnston, 2002; Task Force of the National [...]

Individuals with Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia (referred to as AD) deteriorate over time, and there will likely be a corresponding increase in levels of burden and stress for caregivers. Despite the significant contributions made by informal caregivers, there are no widely available mechanisms that meet the information needs of informal caregivers. Using a qualitative approach, the current study focuses on AD caregiver information seeking. The study involved conducting interviews to answer the following research questions: (1) What motivating factors lead informal caregivers of people with AD to seek out information?; (2) Is there a relationship between information seeking and resulting perceived stress levels?; and (3) Why do informal caregivers choose to utilize certain resources more than others during their information seeking process? Findings revealed that caregivers' largest motivation for seeking information is to learn how to better care for their loved one. Caregivers tend to rely on mediated resources that they find credible, and interpersonal resources such as people with similar experiences to their own. Many participants were satisfied with information available, but others felt that their interactions with healthcare professionals created more stress and emotional anguish than anticipated. This study offers an initial step in finding ways to meet the needs of those who seek to mitigate their stress through information seeking. By studying the information needs of the caregiving population, healthcare workers and communicators will be more knowledgeable about the relationship between information seeking and stress and coping. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]