Search

Factitious disorder imposed on self (FDIS) is a mental disorder characterized by conscious manipulative behavior from patients with no clearly identifiable external objective. It affects subjects with a wide range of characteristics, only some of whom fit the stereotypical profile of the young female working in the health sector. It can take the form of a variety of symptoms or clinical signs, and is likely to involve all specialties. Munchausen syndrome is a particular form of FDIS, more prevalent in men and marked by its severity. Psychiatric comorbidities are common in patients with FDIS. Death is rare but possible, either as a result of the disease itself, complications of examinations or treatments, or suicide. The diagnostic approach must seek to identify positive arguments in favor of the disorder. Diagnosis by elimination remains possible when no other hypothesis can explain a clinical picture suggestive of FDIS. The prognosis is often poor, at least in the short and medium term. Avoiding unnecessary prescriptions is essential to prevent iatrogenesis. The management of FDIS is poorly codified. In all cases, the practitioner must adopt a non-aggressive, empathetic attitude., (Copyright © 2024 The Author. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

We present the case of a young woman with an extensive medical history that most notably includes over 60 emergency-room visits for unfounded respiratory distress that often prompted intubations. Each presentation displays elements of deceitfulness or inappropriate demands that align with factitious disorder imposed on self. Top experts in the Consultation-Liaison field provide guidance for this commonly encountered clinical case based on their experience and review of available literature. Key teaching topics include a review of risk factors for development of deceptive syndromes, distinguishing factitious disorder from malingering and conversion disorder, and the role of a consulting psychiatrist in such cases. Patients with factitious disorder often show signs of pathologic lying, obstinance, and erratic behavior. Such attributes frequently arouse negative countertransference in providers, causing frustration and dread with continuing care, rendering psychiatric involvement. We address the unique challenges in managing factitious disorder and how to effectively collaborate with an interdisciplinary inpatient team with these cases., (Copyright © 2023 Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In palliative care, many end-of-life (EOL) patients are physically dependent on their caregivers. These patients may also have difficulty expressing their needs because of their underlying disease and are vulnerable to abuse. Factitious disorder imposed on another (FDIA) describes a condition in which an individual intentionally feigns physical or psychological signs or symptoms in another person with the intention of deceiving medical providers. Although FDIA is a form of abuse that palliative care workers must be aware of because of its multiple impacts on EOL care, it has never been reported in the palliative care literature. In this case discussion, we highlight a woman with advanced dementia who was subjected to FDIA. We discuss the impact of FDIA on EOL care and the management of FDIA in palliative care.

Abstract: Factitious disorder, a disorder characterized by the falsification of symptoms to obtain primary gain, continues to be one of the more challenging cases that psychiatrists encounter. We describe a case of a woman we treated on the medical unit who falsified several of her symptoms but also was diagnosed with Yao syndrome, a disease that can also cause unexplained symptoms such as abdominal pain and fever. We navigate the difficulties in managing this type of patient and comanaging her with medicine and rheumatology. Although the prevalence of factitious disorder is anywhere from 1% to 2% of patients on the medical floor, they typically utilize a disproportionate number of resources. Despite this, the literature is still inconclusive when it comes to the management and treatment approaches. More study is warranted on this complex and burdensome illness., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Dermatitis artefacta (factitious skin disorder) is a rare psychocutaneous disorder that poses a complex clinical challenge to clinicians. The hallmarks of diagnosis include self-inflicted lesions in accessible areas of the face and extremities that do not correlate with organic disease patterns. Importantly, patients are unable to take ownership of the cutaneous signs. It is essential to acknowledge and focus on the psychologic disorders and life stressors that have predisposed the condition rather than the mechanism of self-injury. The best outcomes are achieved via a holistic approach in the setting of a multidisciplinary psychocutaneous team addressing cutaneous, psychiatric, and psychologic aspects of the condition simultaneously. A nonconfrontational approach to patient care builds rapport and trust, facilitating sustained engagement with treatment. Emphasis on patient education, reassurance with ongoing support, and judgment-free consultations are key. Enhancing patient and clinician education is essential in raising awareness of this condition to promote appropriate and timely referral to the psychocutaneous multidisciplinary team., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with factitious disorders artificially generate, aggravate or feign injuries or illnesses, which can result in severe physical impairment and misuse of the healthcare system. The symptomatology is characterized by a protracted course of disease with frequent changes of practitioners and multiple invasive procedures due to anomalous, mostly chronic findings. Elaborate clinical presentations, lack of knowledge of disease characteristics and the fast-paced everyday clinical practice can lead to maintaining the disease through non-recognition or mistreatment., Methods: Based on selective literature research and clinical case reports from a university clinic for plastic surgery, this article provides a review about common features of factitious disorders as well as treatment strategies., Results: If a factitious disorder is suspected, invasive treatments should be restricted and psychosomatic or psychiatric expertise obtained. Within an empathic physician-patient relation and with psychotherapeutic support, patients can be gradually introduced to the diagnosis and therapy options and treatment terminations could be avoided., Conclusion: Knowledge of indicators for factitious disorders, which may become evident in medical history, findings and illness-affirming behaviour, is key to identify affected patients and initiate appropriate treatment. For this purpose, factitious disorders should be included in differential diagnostic considerations even in primarily somatic medical specialties. Since the diagnosis is often based on evidence and complicated by withheld information or medical confidentiality, the establishment of a central reporting register could facilitate the diagnostic process and improve therapy in the future., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Many elderly patients suffer from both, depressive symptoms and cognitive deficits. Clinically, it oftentimes appears unclear whether the affective or the cognitive problems are primary or secondary. Modern molecular and imaging markers contribute to a more efficient distinction between depression and incipient dementia due to neurodegenerative, vascular, and other diseases. A careful history and clinical investigations are necessary to identify the underlying diseases, but they do not always offer sufficient therapeutic guidance. If in doubt, the condition should always be considered as potentially reversible and treated emphatically (but with age-appropriate caution)., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Munchausen by proxy refers to an individual who abusively and compulsively falsifies physical, psychiatric or developmental disorders in a child or adult victim in order to satisfy a psychological need. Factitious disorder imposed on another refers to the psychopathology in the abuser. Psychologists in medical settings may: (1) identify patients they come to suspect as being victims or perpetrators of MBP, (2) conduct or assist in clinical or forensic evaluations; (3) offer recommendations for clinical case management, and/or (4) provide treatment or referrals. The purpose of this paper is to provide guidance to psychologists and other mental health professionals in medical settings who may encounter individuals with this potentially lethal form of psychopathology.

The diagnosis of factitious disorder can only emerge when caregivers are in difficulty in caring for their patient. This disorder is a real challenge for healthcare teams throughout the treatment, from its discovery to its treatment. Secrecy and self-inflicted injuries are components that we can be uncomfortable with as caregivers. The factitious problem requires well-coordinated care between the various specialists and often questions our practices. In this article we deal with the questions frequently asked by the care teams to the liaison psychiatrists that we are, by working on the identification of the problem in the clinic, the therapeutic issues and the attitude to adopt., Competing Interests: Les auteurs n’ont déclaré aucun conflit d’intérêts en relation avec cet article.

Gardner-Diamond syndrome (GDS) is a rare psychodermatological condition characterized by the formation of spontaneous, painful skin lesions that develop into ecchymosis following episodes of severe physiological or psychological stress. The majority of GDS cases occur in young adult females, and although the etiology of this rare disorder is unknown, there appears to be a psychological component correlated with the coexistence of previous psychiatric diagnoses. Due to the rare nature of this disorder, there exist few guidelines for prompt clinical diagnosis and optimal treatment. Here, a systematic review was conducted to include 45 cases of patients with GDS to better understand clinical presentation as well as current treatment options. Ultimately, GDS is a diagnosis of exclusion after other coagulopathies and causes of purpura are ruled out. High clinical suspicion following laboratory and clinical exclusion of known physiological causes is necessary for diagnosis. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and corticosteroids are cost effective first line treatments for GDS with proven efficacy in symptomatic relief. GDS refractory to initial treatment may require regular psychotherapy and titrated SSRI dosages to achieve long-term success. This review of available case studies serves to comprehensively describe the clinical presentation and available treatment approaches to this rare psychodermatological disorder., (© 2018 The International Society of Dermatology.)

Background: The objective of this study was to describe presentation, natural history, management and long-term outcomes of patients with psychogenic purpura (PP), also known as Gardner-Diamond Syndrome., Methods: In this retrospective study, records of patients with a diagnosis of PP seen at Mayo Clinic, Rochester from 1976 to 2016 were reviewed. Available literature regarding PP was also comparatively reviewed., Results: Seventy-six patients with a diagnosis of PP were identified and 54/76 (71%) experienced a prodromal sensation. The Condensed MCMDM-1 bleeding score, excluding cutaneous manifestations, was <3 in 91% of patients. Laboratory tests of primary and secondary hemostasis were normal. Fifty-four percent of patients had an underlying psychiatric diagnosis. Management approaches included psychological counseling and psychiatry evaluation in 44 patients. Pharmacologic treatment for 30 patients included psychotropic agents, antihistamines, hormonal medications and anti-inflammatory agents. At a median follow-up of 5years (range 1-34),13/28 (46.4%) experienced recurrent ecchymoses and 6 continued to seek hematology follow-up at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. Our data was similar to the aggregate data from case reports in the literature., Conclusions: For patients with unexplained recurrent ecchymosis a diagnosis of PP should be considered. Diagnosis is one of exclusion and initial evaluation should include documenting a bleeding score and obtaining laboratory tests assessing primary and secondary hemostasis. The relatively low bleeding scores together with laboratory assessments support that PP is primarily a dermal rather than a systemic bleeding diathesis. In our cohort, addressing psychological stressors was the most effective treatment; however pharmacologic therapy can be used for refractory disease., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The terms exfoliative cheilitis, factitial cheilitis, and morsicatio labiorum are used to describe self-inflicted lesions of the lip., Objective: Here we report and analyze clinical, pathological, and therapeutic data on 13 patients with a form of factitial cheilitis that we believe should be considered a separate entity., Results: Eight patients were male and 5 patients were female. All patients reported pain and presented with crusts consisting of dried saliva and topical medications adherent to the surface of the lips. These patients expressed great concern with their condition, and reported several previous, ineffective treatments. Simple reassurance only was not effective; saline compresses alleviated symptoms for a few patients. Most patients were lost to follow-up. Biopsies were not performed on all patients., Conclusion: This particular type of cheilitis artefacta has been previously described, but some features described herein are new and allow a specific approach: patient's behavior, the "protrusion sign," and possible improvement with antidepressants. For these cases, we propose the term ointment pseudo-cheilitis because it comprises the nature of the attached material and the lack of true inflammation. Further psychiatric characterization is a logical next step in further characterizing this difficult-to-treat condition.

Although exaggeration or amplification of symptoms is common in all illness, deliberate deception is rare. In settings associated with litigation/disability evaluation, the rate of malingering may be as high as 30%, but its frequency in clinical practice is not known. We describe the main characteristics of deliberate deception (factitious disorders and malingering) and ways that neurologists might detect symptom exaggeration. The key to establishing that the extent or severity of reported symptoms does not truly represent their severity is to elicit inconsistencies in different domains, but it is not possible to determine whether the reports are intentionally inaccurate. Neurological disorders where difficulty in determining the degree of willed exaggeration is most likely include functional weakness and movement disorders, post-concussional syndrome (or mild traumatic brain injury), psychogenic non-epileptic attacks and complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (especially when there is an associated functional movement disorder). Symptom amplification or even fabrication are more likely if the patient might gain benefit of some sort, not necessarily financial. Techniques to detect deception in medicolegal settings include covert surveillance and review of social media accounts. We also briefly describe specialised psychological tests designed to elicit effort from the patient., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Rationale: Hemoptysis or hematemesis is a common clinical symptom in adults, but is unusually to be observed in children. Hemoptysis can occur with circulatory diseases, injuries, several types of systemic diseases, or systemic factors including factitious disorder (FD), which is difficult to be diagnosed. Here, we report a case of hemoptysis caused by FD to provide a diagnostic flow chart for such kind of disease., Patient Concerns: An 11-year-old female patient had a history of hemoptysis or hematemesis for 6 months and suffered with paroxysmal syncope for a month., Diagnosis and Intervention: A series of examinations had been launched to evaluate any possible malformation or abnormalities of the patient including fiberoptic bronchoscopy, cardiac catheterization, gastroscopy, nasolaryngoscopy, electrocardiogram, electroencephalogram, and enhanced magnetic resonance image of the paranasal sinus. Several methods had been performed and tried to stop hemoptysis such as taking hemostatic medications, lavage of fiberoptic bronchoscopy, and embolism for abnormal bronchial arterial using cardiac catheter. All the interventions, however, failed to achieve our treatment goal. Given that more careful observation during hospitalization had been done, and we suspected the symptom of hemoptysis from this patient might be originated from an FD., Outcomes: Based on the diagnosis of FD, targeted psychological intervention was provided by experts. After the treatment completed, the patient did not present hemoptysis anymore., Lessons: FD is an uncommon type of disease. This rare case described here is to help us to reconsider the long diagnosis process of hemoptysis with a series of examinations including some invasive procedures, whether all the examinations and interventions are necessary for a nonsevere hemoptysis patient.

Dermatitis artefacta (DA) or artefactual skin disease (ASD) is a factitious skin disorder rarely reported in the pediatric population. Skin lesions are produced deliberately either consciously or in a dissociative state to satisfy an underlying psychological need. Children may present with acutely formed skin changes or with chronic lesions, quite often having seen other specialists during their journey. The mechanism of formation of skin lesions can vary from the application of pigment onto the skin to simulate disease or more destructive techniques like the injection of irritant substances into the skin. Whichever mode used, it is important to focus on why rather than how the lesions are produced. Establishing a strong physician-patient-family relationship is important in managing this condition. The prognosis of the condition is variable, but it has been shown that resolution of the underlying psychosocial stressor leads to improvement of the skin. We advocate a multidisciplinary team approach in managing DA as it has shown to improve outcomes.

Objective Factitious disorders are known to exist in the medical community but are not commonly diagnosed in clinical practice. The majority of the literature on factitious disorder comes from case reports or case series. This particular case is unusual because it describes a patient who initially presented with purely physical complaints, but over time, the symptoms transitioned into predominantly psychiatric concerns. This case describes the patient's unique presentation and is followed by a discussion of the management of factitious disorder. Methods The patient was seen during the course of an inpatient psychiatric hospitalization. Electronic chart review was conducted, and information from each prior hospitalization was gathered between the dates of first initial documented presentation available in the electronic record in 1995 to most recent hospitalization in 2017. Results The patient still continues to present to the emergency department. Upon each presentation, staff work to objectively assess his complaints to be sure that there is no true underlying medical emergency. There is also a focus on providing non-judgmental, supportive, and compassionate care. Conclusion This case highlights the importance of corroborating objective findings with the patient's subjective reports gathered during a history and physical, and to recognize that patients with this disorder can present to any specialty. Thus, the collaboration between specialties is critical in the care of these patients to minimize unnecessary, costly, and sometimes dangerous interventions.

Munchausen syndrome by proxy is a relatively rare behavioral disorder affecting a child's primary caregiver, typically the mother. Ethical dilemmas that physicians may face in such situations mainly concern the medical options for best protecting the child's welfare, that are important, in clinical pediatric practice, because critical conflicts might arise between health professionals and parents. In such cases, the physician's primary obligation is to protect the children involved, whose family environment may be essential to their wellbeing. Ev- ery ethical choice should be tailored to a given child's story, which should be viewed as a whole, considering the possible consequences for the family balance, and taking the complexity of the emotional and psychological dimensions of children's relationship with their parents into account. Specific protocols, discussion of clinical cases, open communi- cation of feelings will help doctors to deal more effectively with the families involved and ensure that treatment decisions are made in the child's best interest.

Patients with factitious disorders intentionally fabricate, exaggerate or feign physical and/or psychiatric symptoms for various open and covert psychological reasons. There are many issues regarding the diagnostic state and classification of factitious disorders. Both the categorical differentiation of and clinical continuum ranging from somatoform/dissociative disorders to malingering are being controversially debated. Epidemiological studies on the frequency of factitious disorder meet basic methodological difficulties. Reported rates of prevalence and incidence in the professional literature most probably have to be considered underestimations. Illness deception and self-harm as core features of the abnormal illness behaviour in factitious disorder may refer to various highly adverse and traumatic experiences during early development in a subgroup of patients. Chronic courses of illness prevail; however, there are also episodic variants.

Psychocutaneous disease, defined in this review as primary psychiatric disease with skin manifestations, is commonly encountered in dermatology. Dermatologists can play an important role in the management of psychocutaneous disease because patients visit dermatology for treatment of their skin problems but often refuse psychiatric intervention. This review describes common psychocutaneous syndromes, including delusional, factitious, obsessive-compulsive and related, and eating disorders, as well as psychogenic pruritus, cutaneous sensory (pain) syndromes, posttraumatic stress disorder, and sleep-wake disorders. The updated classification of these disorders in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition is included. Strategies for management are reviewed., (Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The classification of self-inflicted skin lesions proposed by the European Society for Dermatology and Psychiatry (ESDaP) group generated questions with regard to specific treatments that could be recommended for such cases. The therapeutic guidelines in the current paper integrate new psychotherapies and psychotropic drugs without forgetting the most important relational characteristics required for dealing with people with these disorders. The management of self-inflicted skin lesions necessitates empathy and a doctor-patient relationship based on trust and confidence. Cognitive behavioural therapy and/or psychodynamic and psychoanalytic psychotherapy (alone, or combined with the careful use of psychotropic drugs) seem to achieve the best results in the most difficult cases. Relatively new therapeutic techniques, such as habit reversal and mentalization-based psychotherapy, may be beneficial in the treatment of skin picking syndromes.

Malingering is the intentional fabrication of medical symptoms for the purpose of external gain. Along similar lines as malingering, factitious disorder is the intentional creation or exaggeration of symptoms, but without intent for a concrete benefit. The incidence of malingering and factitious disorder in the military is unclear, but likely under reported for a variety of reasons. One should be aware of potential red flags suggesting malingering or factitious disorder and consider further evaluation to look for these conditions. A deliberate and intentional management plan is ideal in these cases. Furthermore, a multi-disciplinary team approach, a non-judgmental environment, and the use of direct but dignity sparing techniques will likely be most "successful" when confronting the patient with malingering or factitious disorder.

The primary aims are to consider whether a range of paternalistic medical interventions can be justified in the treatment of factitious disorder (FD) and to show that the particularities of FD and its management make it an ideal phenomenon to highlight the difficulties of balancing respect for self-determination, responsibility and duty of care in psychiatry. FD is usually classified as a mental disorder involving deliberate and hidden feigning or inducement of illness, in order to achieve patient status. Both the nature of the disorder and the approach to treatment are controversial and under-researched. It is argued that FD should be classified as a mental disorder; may well expose the patient to extreme risk; can warrant paternalistic interventions, in order to fulfil duty of care. Moreover, treatment of FD is inherently paternalistic and therefore raises interesting questions about justifications and type of paternalistic interventions in psychiatry both for FD and in general. A brief account of key questions concerning psychiatry and paternalism is followed by some case histories of FD, the clinical dilemmas posed and the question of how this disorder might warrant paternalistic interventions. In order to answer this question, two things are considered: the legitimacy and character of FD as a mental disorder; possible frameworks for and types of paternalistic interventions. To conclude, it is argued that there are no compelling reasons for rejecting the use of paternalistic interventions for FD, but that further investigation of FD and type and frameworks for psychiatric paternalism, in relation to FD and other mental disorders, are urgently needed., (© 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Self-injury often occurs for the first time in adolescence. The current classification distinguishes several groups: (1) factitious disorder imposed on self and factitious disorder imposed on another, (2) nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) and (3) obsessive-compulsive (OCD) and related disorders. The differential diagnosis includes a wide spectrum of psychiatric diseases, including borderline personality disorder (BPD), inherited disorders like Lesch-Nyhan syndrome (LNS) and also body modifications. In all these cases, self-harm is a subphenomenon. This review focuses on typical dermatological pictures.

Dermatitis artefacta is a self-inflicted skin disease with a multifactorial aetiology. The condition can be a symptom of an underlying psychiatric condition or a sign of psycho-social stressors. This paper gives an updated view on dermatitis artefacta. The majority of the patients have some form of psychiatric co-morbidity including depression and anxiety. Many have experienced negative life events such as diseases or deaths. Personality disorders were reported in only two studies. Treatment options besides the acute treatment of the skin were psychotherapy and psychotropic drugs.

The main task of palliative care specialists is to focus on symptom control such as pain, nausea or fatigue. Thorough anamnesis, physical examination, laboratory examination, and differential diagnosis can ensure appropriate treatment. In an increasing number of cases psychiatric conditions like depression or anxiety increase also occur so palliative care physicians need to be more prepared to handle them. The question of this case report is, how a palliative care specialist can distinguish between a malignant disease or neurological disease progression and a presentation primarily psychiatric in etiology, as is the case in factitious disorders. We are also interested in the incidence rate of such factitious disorders. Our case study demonstrates that it is rare but not impossible that a doctor will encounter factitious symptoms in the palliative setting. This suggest being aware of evidence of psychiatric origins even in discharge letters and referrals that indicate palliative care needs, to ensure that palliative care really is the best treatment option for the patient. We do believe such cases to be rare in a palliative setting, however.

Background: Dermatitis artefacta (DA) consists of self-inflicted skin lesions that the patient denies having produced., Objectives: To conduct a single-center retrospective clinical review of children and adolescents diagnosed with DA., Methods: From 1976 to 2006, data were collected on children diagnosed with DA who were seen in the Department of Dermatology in our hospital. Clinical and epidemiologic features are described. Forty-four children (mean age 12.9 yrs) were selected, representing 21.9% of the total patients with DA recorded (n = 201) during this period., Results: The most frequent clinical forms were excoriations (16 [36.4%]) and ulcers (10 [22.7%]), followed by blisters (7 [15.9%]), burns (3 [6.8%]), contact dermatitis (3 [6.8%]), hematomas (2 [4.5%]), panniculitis (1 [2.3%]), cheilitis (1 [2.3%]), and hyperpigmentation (1 [2.3%]). Sixteen were located exclusively on the face and neck, whereas 28 also had other locations (upper limbs, n = 10; lower limbs, n = 9; thorax, n = 5; abdomen, n = 4). Cutaneous lesions were treated with occlusive bandages using zinc paste or a plaster splint when necessary., Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the largest reported series of DA in childhood. This complicated psychodermatologic condition requires correct diagnosis, appropriate management, and psychiatric assessment., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Numerous psychopathological syndromes have been attributed to posttraumatic stress, both at the time of the trauma and many years later. To date, however, there is little literature on pseudodementia as a delayed traumatic stress response. The authors present a case history of a 50-year-old woman who developed severe cognitive impairment following retrieval of previously forgotten memories of childhood sexual abuse. Her cognitive condition deteriorated rapidly and dramatically. Neuropsychological assessment and clinical presentation led to a diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia (vs. corticobasal degeneration). Detailed neurologic and medical evaluations could not identify any underlying physical cause. Her condition progressively worsened over 9 months, at which point memantine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, was begun. The patient regained full functioning over the next year. Although an organic cause could not be ruled out, it was likely that recovery of traumatic memories was contributory to the patient's condition, as ongoing psychotherapy had begun 1 year into the course. If additional cases with similar presentations are reported, such cases would corroborate the notion that persistent, severe, and reversible cognitive impairment constitutes a previously unrecognized and atypical posttraumatic response., (© 2015 International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies.)

Compared with other psychiatric disorders, diagnosis of factitious disorders is rare, with identification largely dependent on the systematic collection of relevant information, including a detailed chronology and scrutiny of the patient's medical record. Management of such disorders ideally requires a team-based approach and close involvement of the primary care doctor. As deception is a key defining component of factitious disorders, diagnosis has important implications for young children, particularly when identified in women and health-care workers. Malingering is considered to be rare in clinical practice, whereas simulation of symptoms, motivated by financial rewards, is regarded as more common in medicolegal settings. Although psychometric investigations (eg, symptom validity testing) can inform the detection of illness deception, such tests need support from converging evidence sources, including detailed interview assessments, medical notes, and relevant non-medical investigations. A key challenge in any discussion of abnormal health-care-seeking behaviour is the extent to which a person's reported symptoms are considered to be a product of choice, or psychopathology beyond volitional control, or perhaps both. Clinical skills alone are not typically sufficient for diagnosis or to detect malingering. Medical education needs to provide doctors with the conceptual, developmental, and management frameworks to understand and deal with patients whose symptoms appear to be simulated. Central to the understanding of factitious disorders and malingering are the explanatory models and beliefs used to provide meaning for both patients and doctors. Future progress in management will benefit from an increased appreciation of the contribution of non-medical factors and a greater awareness of the conceptual and clinical findings from social neuroscience, occupational health, and clinical psychology., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Fabricated or induced illness (previously known as Munchausen syndrome by proxy) takes place when a caregiver elicits health care on the child's behalf in an unjustified way. Although the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders specifies deception as a perpetrator characteristic, a far wider range is encountered clinically and is included in this Review. We describe the features of fabricated or induced illness, its effect on the child, and the psychosocial characteristics of caregivers and their possible motives. Present evidence suggests that somatoform and factitious disorders are over-represented in caregivers, with possible intergenerational transmission of abnormal illness behaviour from the caregiver to the child. Paediatricians' early recognition of perplexing presentations preceding fabricated or induced illness and their management might obviate the development of this disorder. In cases of fully developed fabricated or induced illness, as well as protection, the child will need help to return to healthy functioning and understand the fabricated or induced illness experience. Management of the perpetrator is largely dependent on their capacity to acknowledge the abusive behaviour and collaborate with helping agencies. If separation is necessary, reunification of mother and child is rare, but can be achieved in selected cases. More collaborative research is needed in this specialty, especially regarding close study of the characteristics of women with somatoform and factitious disorders who involve their children in abnormal illness behaviour. We recommend that general hospitals establish proactive networks including multidisciplinary cooperation between designated staff from both paediatric and adult mental health services., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Factitial dermatitis describes self-produced and consciously made skin lesions usually intended to win sympathy, avoid responsibilities and even gain disability insurance. Dermatitis artefacta belongs to an extensive spectrum of self-inflicted diseases termed factitious diseases., Objectives: The study is retrospective, and the patients were seen in our department from 2002 to 2012., Materials and Methods: For patients with skin lesions, the demographic features and clinical descriptive characteristics of their lesions were ascertained. Patient files and photographs were reviewed and the patients were called for follow-up., Results: A total of 25 patients were recorded. Mean age of the patients was 25.64 ± 11.80. With the exception of two cases, all patients were females. With regard to location, 27% of the patients showed facial localization, whereas the lesions have been localized on the extremities in 44%. The most common clinical appearance of DA was crusted eroded lesions (24%) and excoriations (24%) followed by ulcers (12%), superficial erosion (12%), acute eczematous lesions (8%), purpuric lesions (8%), pigment application (8%), diffuse erythema (8%), hyperpigmentation (8%), blister (4%), hair cutting (4%), hypopigmentation (4%) and cellulitis (4%). Forty percent of the patients had multiple lesions. There were eight children with dermatitis artefacta whose mean age was 14.50. The predominant lesion in these cases was superficial eroded plaque (37.5%). While patients with mild lesions limited in number receive ambulatory care, almost half of the patients require hospitalization. In this study, all patients were referred to psychiatric consultation, but most of them either refused treatment or did not receive medications., Conclusion: Although it is primarily a psychiatric disease, dermatitis artefacta is frequently diagnosed by dermatologists. Detailed history and physical examination are key factors because it imitates an extensive spectrum of diseases.

The factitious disorders (FDs) include a large group of dermatological conditions characterized by skin lesions that patients themselves self-inflict but deny their active participation. FDs usually represent a diagnostic challenge, and their therapeutic management is usually based on a multidisciplinary approach because most FRD patients also suffer from undiagnosed behavior and personality disorders. We report two cases of FD: one patient that was suffering from severe depression and induced third-degree chemical burns on his own lower limbs, and another patient affected by obsessive-compulsive disorder and anorexia nervosa that presented with deep self-inflicted ulcers on her face. Our multispecialist approach, based on close cooperation between dermatologists and psychiatrists, led to a significant improvement of clinical conditions in both cases. Dermatologists need to be aware that FDs are complex disorders and a multidisciplinary approach is usually recommended to control their clinical course.

Background: Dermatitis artefacta (DA) is a factitious skin disorder caused by the deliberate production of skin lesions by patients with a history of underlying psychological problems. The patient may not be fully aware of this, and the true extent of this disorder, especially in children, is currently unknown. Management of these patients is challenging as many fail to engage effectively with their dermatologist., Objectives: To explore the various clinical presentations and strategies employed to treat DA in our local population, and note outcomes in order to evaluate effectiveness of our management., Methods: A retrospective case note review was conducted of 28 patients attending the regional psychodermatology clinic at the Royal London Hospital from January 2003 to December 2011., Results: Out of 28 patients identified with DA, the majority of patients were female, and the most frequent sites for skin lesions were the face and upper body. Anxiety, depression and personality disorders were common underlying psychiatric diagnoses. Ninety-three per cent of patients were successfully managed (i.e. the DA resolved or was in remission at the time of writing) in our combined psychodermatology clinic by a multidisciplinary psychocutaneous medicine team. Thirty-two per cent of our cases were children (aged < 16 years) and one of these was referred to local child protection services; 46% of patients had a concomitant mental health disease at the time of presentation with DA., Conclusions: A multidisciplinary psychocutaneous team is important in this condition particularly as the patient is likely to require psychological intervention (to facilitate the resolution of the precipitant), in addition to dermatological (to make the diagnosis and, importantly, to exclude organic disease) and psychiatric (to manage concomitant psychiatric disease) input. Our findings indicate that our model of a psychodermatology multidisciplinary team will achieve greater successful treatment of patients with DA and we are the first to describe this important service in the U.K., (© 2013 British Association of Dermatologists.)

Purpose: To improve our understanding of factitious hand disorders with a review of our experience over 29 years in a multidisciplinary hand center., Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify workers' compensation patients treated for factitious hand disorders in the multidisciplinary hand center between January 1981 and September 2010. Multidisciplinary evaluation at this center involved evaluation by hand surgeons, occupational therapists, and psychologists. Data collected include age, sex, race, educational level, clinical presentation, number of diagnostic tests, number of surgeries, time to referral to the multidisciplinary center, direct cost of care, psychological diagnosis, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, treatment modalities, and work status., Results: We identified 174 workers' compensation patients with factitious hand disorders. Presentation was used to classify patients into 1 of 4 categories: psychopathological dystonia, factitious edema, psychopathological complex regional pain syndrome, and factitious wound creation and manipulation. There were statistically significant differences between the 4 categories in demographics, utilization of medical resources, psychopathology, treatment modalities, and return-to-work status. Patients with factitious wounds were more educated, used more medical resources, demonstrated an angry or hostile profile, and experienced a lower return-to-work rate. Patients with dystonia were less educated, used less medical resources, demonstrated a hypochondriasis or depressed profile, and experienced a higher return-to-work rate., Conclusions: Treatment of factitious hand disorders remains frustrating and costly due to failure or recurrence after traditional approaches. This review is a large-scale examination of the factitious hand disorder population that demonstrates the unique pathology involved in each of the 4 categories. There is a specific association between the category of hand disorder and the underlying pathology and prognosis., Type of Study/level of Evidence: Prognostic IV., (Copyright © 2013 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The number of patients who seek help at primary and secondary care for somatic symptoms which cannot be explained by any known medical condition is enormous. It has been proposed to rename 'somatoform disorders' in DSM-IV as 'somatic symptom disorders' in DSM-5. This is supposed to include disorders such as somatization disorder, hypochondriasis, undifferentiated somatoform disorder, pain disorder and factitious disorder. The reason for the renaming and grouping is that all these disorders involve presentation of physical symptoms and/or concern about medical illness. In the literature, there is considerable variation adopted with respect to diagnosis and in the approaches adopted for intervention. However, the common feature of these disorders is the chronicity, social dysfunction, occupational difficulties and the increased healthcare use and high level of dissatisfaction for both the clinician and the patient. A number of behavioural and psychological interventions for somatic symptoms have been carried out at primary, secondary and tertiary care settings and recently there have been more attempts to involve the primary care physicians in the psychological interventions. This review aims at giving an overview of the components of the behavioural and other psychological interventions available for addressing medically unexplained somatic symptoms and to present their efficacy.

Patients often communicate emotions through their bodies and physical symptoms; the skin commonly serves as a means of expression in the patient-doctor relationship. It is important for the dermatologist to be able to indentify psychological issues that manifest in the skin and the interplay between psychiatric and dermatologic conditions. Delusional parasitosis, dermatitis artefacta, trichotillomania, and somatoform disorders all represent dermatologic conditions with underlying emotional causes. Many chronic dermatoses, such as psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and acne, modulate and are influenced by psychosocial factors. Special issues, including significant medication interactions and the treatment of the "difficult" patient, are reviewed., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)