Search

Background & Objective: Peripheral nerve blocks are one of the peri-operative analgesic options that abolish surgical stress response, reduce the use of opioids, and control postoperative pain. During the previous few decades regional anesthesia and analgesia techniques have been widely used, especially with the enhanced safety and precision in these procedures with the use of ultrasound. We compared the efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) with Fascia Iliaca Block (FIB) for postoperative pain in hemiarthroplasty surgery. Methodology: This randomized double-blind trial included sixty-eight cases scheduled for hemiarthroplasty under spinal anesthesia. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups: Group ES received ESPB, and Group FI received FIB. Blocks were performed preoperatively using 15 mL bupivacaine 0.25%- and 15 mL lidocaine 2%. Postoperatively, pain was assessed with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 1 h, 2 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h. Results: The mean time to first dose and the amount of morphine used in the first 24 hours were comparable between Group ES and Group FI. Visual analogue scale measurements at rest and movement showed insignificant differences between both groups at 1 h, 2 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h. Quadriceps motor impairment revealed significant reduction in Group ES compared to Group FI (11.76 vs 44.12%, P = 0.006). Conclusions: In hemiarthroplasty, the analgesic profile of erector spinae plane block was comparable with fascia iliaca block with superiority of the former in preserving the quadriceps motor power. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To compare the influence of fascia iliaca block (FIB) under ultrasound and intraspinal anesthesia on anesthesia placement position and postoperative analgesia in patients with hip fractures. Methods A total of 83 patients with hip fractures admitted to Wuhu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from July 2022 to August 2023 were selected and divided into clinical group (41 cases) and control group (42 cases). The clinical group received FIB combined with intraspinal anesthesia, and the control group was given intraspinal anesthesia. Anesthesia effect, perioperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, fracture recovery Bromage score, dosage of anesthetic drug within 48 h after surgery and occurrence of anesthesia adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of anesthesia in clinical group was 95.12%, which was higher than 78.57% in control group (χ2=4.943, P=0.026). VAS scores in clinical group at the time of changing position and at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery were lower than those in control group (P＜0.05). The Bromage scores in clinical group at 30 min after analgesia and 12 h to 48 h after surgery were lower than those in control group (P＜0.05). The number of analgesic pump compression and dosage of sufentanil citrate within 48 h in clinical group were significantly lower than those in control group (P＜0.05). There was no significant difference in adverse reactions between the two groups (χ2=0.001, P=0.970). Conclusion FIB has a good analgesia effect during anesthesia placement position and at rest, and it can accelerate the postoperative lower limb muscle strength and hip function recovery, and it is a safe and effective method to relieve pain in patients with hip fractures.

Hip replacement surgery can be painful; postoperative analgesia is crucial for comfort and to facilitate recovery. Regional anaesthesia can reduce pain and postoperative opioid requirements. The role of ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for analgesia after elective total hip arthroplasty is not well defined. This randomised trial evaluated its analgesic efficacy. Consenting participants (134) scheduled for elective primary total hip arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca block with ropivacaine 0.5% or sham block with saline. The primary outcome was opioid consumption in the first 24 h after surgery. Additional outcomes included pain scores at 4, 8, 12, and 16 h, opioid-related side-effects (nausea, vomiting, pruritis), ability to perform physiotherapy on the first postoperative day, and physiotherapist-assessed quadriceps weakness. There were no significant differences in 24-h opioid consumption (block vs sham block, mean difference −3.2 mg oral morphine equivalent, 95% confidence interval −15.3 to 8.1 mg oral morphine equivalent, P =0.55) or any other prespecified outcomes. In patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty, ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block with ropivacaine did not confer a significant opioid-sparing effect compared with sham block. There were no differences in other secondary outcomes including pain scores, opioid-related side-effects, or ability to perform physiotherapy on the first postoperative day. www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03069183). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The incidence of hip fractures has continued to increase as life expectancy increases. Hip fracture is one of the leading causes of increased morbidity and mortality in the geriatric population. Early surgical treatment (<48 h) is often recommended to reduce morbidity/mortality. In addition, adequate pain management is crucial to optimize functional recovery and early mobilization. Pain management often consists of multimodal therapy which includes non-opioids, opioids, and regional anesthesia techniques. In this review, we describe the anatomical innervation of the hip joint and summarize the commonly used peripheral nerve blocks to provide pain relief for hip fractures. We also outline literature evidence that shows each block's efficacy in providing adequate pain relief. The recent discovery of a nerve block that may provide adequate sensory blockade of the posterior capsule of the hip is also described. Finally, we report a surgeon's perspective on nerve blocks for hip fractures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study compares Fascia Iliaca compartment (FI) block and Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block for hip surgery. Methods: Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane were systematically searched in April 2022. Inclusion criteria were: Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs); comparing PENG block versus FI block for hip surgery; patients over 18 years of age; and reporting outcomes immediately postoperative. We excluded studies with overlapped populations and without a head-to-head comparison of the PENG block vs. FI block. Mean-Difference (MD) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were pooled. Trial Sequential Analyses (TSA) were performed to assess inconsistency. Quality assessment and risk of bias were performed according to Cochrane recommendations. Results: Eight RCTs comprising 384 patients were included, of whom 196 (51%) underwent PENG block. After hip surgery, PENG block reduced static pain score at 12h post-surgery (MD = 0.61 mm; 95% CI 1.12 to -0.09; p = 0.02) and cumulative postoperative oral morphine consumption in the first 24h (MD = -6.93 mg; 95% CI -13.60 to -0.25; p = 0.04) compared with the FI group. However, no differences were found between the two techniques regarding dynamic and static pain scores at 6 h or 24 h post-surgery, or in the time to the first analgesic rescue after surgery. Conclusion: The findings suggest that PENG block reduced opioid consumption in the first 24 h after surgery and reduced pain scores at rest at 12 h post-surgery. Further research is needed to fully understand the effects of the PENG block and its potential benefits compared to FI block. PROSPERO registration: CRD42022339628 PROSPERO registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=339628

Background: Regional nerve blocks have attained a popularity for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) because they can anesthetize a wider area with a prolonged postoperative analgesic effect. This clinical trial compared postoperative pain control using popliteal plexus blockade (PPB) and fascia iliaca block (FIB) in cases of TKA. Methodology: This double-blinded randomized clinical trial enrolled 60 patients planned for unilateral, primary TKA under spinal anesthesia. Participants were randomly allocated to either the PPB group or the FIB group. The blocks were performed at the end of surgery. Postoperative pain was measured on Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) during rest, and on arrival in PACU, then at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h. Time to first rescue, total morphine consumption and any complications / side-effects were noted in both groups. Results: Numeric rating scale (NRS) scores at 8 h and 12 h during rest, and at 4 h, 8 h, and 12 h during movement were significantly lower in the FIB group than in the PPB group. Morphine consumption in the first 24 h postoperative was significantly lower in the FIB group than in the PPB group. Time to first rescue was delayed significantly in the FIB group than PPB group. Rehabilitation was comparable between the two groups. Patient satisfaction, postoperative nausea and vomiting, hypotension, and bradycardia were comparable between both groups. Conclusions: Fascia iliaca block was superior to popliteal plexus blockade in controlling postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty, as evidenced by lower pain scores, lesser postoperative morphine consumption, and delayed time to first analgesic request with comparable minimal adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: The pupillary pain index (PPI) allows the evaluation of intraoperative nociception by measuring pupillary reaction after a localized electrical stimulus. It was the objective of this observational cohort study to investigate the pupillary pain index (PPI) as a method to evaluate the fascia iliaca block (FIB) or adductor canal block (ACB) sensory areas during general anaesthesia in orthopaedic patients with lower-extremity joint replacement surgery. Materials and Methods: Orthopaedic patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty were included. After anaesthesia induction, patients received an ultrasound-guided single-shot FIB or ACB with 30 mL and 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine, respectively. Anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane or propofol/remifentanil. The first PPI measurements were performed after anaesthesia induction and before block insertion, the second at the end of surgery. Pupillometry scores were evaluated in the area of the femoral or saphenous nerve (target) and C3 dermatome (control). Primary outcomes were differences between PPIs before and after peripheral block insertion as well as the relationship between PPIs and postoperative pain scores; secondary outcomes were the relationship between PPIs and opioid requirements after surgery. Results: PPI decreased significantly from the first to the second measurement (4.17 ± 2.7 vs. 1.6 ± 1.2, p < 0.001 for target; 4.46 ± 2.7 vs. 2.17 ± 2.1, p < 0.001 for control). Control and target measurements did not show significant differences. A linear regression analysis showed that early postoperative pain scores could be predicted with intraoperative piritramide with improved prediction after adding PPI scores, PCA opioids and surgery type. Forty-eight-hour pain scores at rest and in movement were correlated with intraoperative piritramide and control PPI after the PNB in movement and with second-postoperative-day opioids and target PPI scores before block insertion, respectively. Conclusions: While the effect of an FIB and ACB could not be shown with PPI postoperative pain scores due to a large effect of opioids, perioperative PPI was shown to be associated with postoperative pain. These results suggest that preoperative PPI may be used to predict postoperative pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Following hip surgeries, adequate perioperative analgesia can help in better postoperative recovery. Fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) and PENG block both have been used for perioperative analgesia. Aim: To comparatively assess the analgesic effects of PENG (per capsular nerve block) to ultrasound-guided fascia iliac block in elderly subjects undergoing hip surgeries. Methods: 160 subjects undergoing hip fracture surgeries under spinal anesthesia were divided into 2 groups where Group I was given ultrasound-guided fascia iliac block and Group II subjects were given per capsular nerve block for perioperative analgesia. The VAS scores and quality of subjects were assessed. Results: Demographic data were comparable for both groups. Patient acceptance in Group I have been seen in 45% (n=36) of subjects. In Group II, acceptance was seen in 90% (n=72) subjects which were significantly higher for Group II compared to Group I. Quality of patient positioning was significantly higher for Group II, 3.135±0.736 compared to group I, 21.65±0.15. This difference was statistically significant with p=0.004. 30 minutes following block, during hip movement and positioning, mean VAS scores were significantly higher for Group I than Group II with p<0.001. Postoperative analgesia duration was significantly higher for Group II (PENG block). Conclusion: PENG block has better analgesic effects along with higher patient satisfaction and optimal positioning compared to the fascia iliaca block for the central neuraxial block for subjects undergoing hip fracture surgeries. Also, PENG had a better safety profile and comparable postoperative analgesia as with fascia iliaca block. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Fascia iliaca blocks (FIBs) are an efficacious form of prehospital regional anaesthesia for patients with neck of femur fracture. Current prehospital use is limited. Aims: The primary aim of this study was to assess procedural confidence among allied health professionals. The secondary aim was to examine concerns related to prehospital use of FIB. Methods: This was a qualitative study that analysed semi-structured interviews. Two recognised groups were involved: paramedics and advanced practitioners. Results: A total of 12 semi-structured interviews were conducted. Four factors were found to contribute to procedural confidence. All practitioners felt confident to perform the FIB. In its secondary aim, to identify concerns related to FIBs, the study found three major themes: risk of doing harm; receiving adequate training; and procedural governance. Conclusions: Procedural confidence was high. Training and governance were highlighted as barriers to procedural expansion. Research is required to assess feasibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Early rehabilitation after knee arthroscopic surgery is needed to improve functional recovery which is achieved by ideal analgesia.The aim of the work: This study aimed to compare between safety and efficacy of fascia iliaca block [FIB] and adductor canal block [ACB] using ultrasound guidance for post-operative analgesia and motor affection of quadriceps muscle after knee arthroscopic surgeries.Patients and Methods: Sixty patients of American Society of Anesthesiologist [ASA] I and II were included. They were scheduled for elective knee arthroscopic surgeries between April 2017 and October 2018. They were selected from Al-Azhar University Hospital [Damietta, Egypt]. They were randomly allocated to receive either FIB or ACB by bupivacaine 0.25 with ultrasound guidance. Their pain, and sensory block were assessed before and after procedure. The time for first analgesic request and total consumed analgesics were documented.Results: At 30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours, there were no significant differences among the mean value of Numerical Rating Scale [NRS] between FIB and ACB. The first time to introduce morphine and total morphine consumption showed no significant differences between FIB and ACB. There was significant motor affection of FIB in comparison with ACB.Conclusion: FIB and ACB provided effective and safe postoperative analgesia for patients scheduled for knee arthroscopic surgeries, with sparing of quadriceps muscle strength and early ambulation in ACB patients.

Background: Adequate postoperative pain relief facilitates rapid recovery by enhancing early ambulation. The aim of the study was a comparison between the efficiency of patient-controlled analgesia via continuous fascia iliaca block and continuous epidural block in patients undergoing total knee replacement under Spinal anesthesia. Patients and methods: A comparative prospective clinical trial was performed upon 48 patients undergoing total knee replacement randomly distributed into two equal groups: Continuous Fascia Iliaca Compartment block (CFICB) and Continuous epidural block (CEB). Two hours after spinal anesthesia, a bolus of 30ml and 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine were given in the first and second groups respectively; then patientcontrolled analgesia (PCA) infuser was connected to perineural and epidural catheters and bupivacaine (0.125%) was infused for 48 hrs. postoperatively at a rate of 5 ml/h, the bolus infusion volume was 2ml, and the lockout time was set to 15 minutes. Results: Statistically, the analgesic efficacy and the level of patient satisfaction in both groups were comparable. The mean blood pressure was significantly lower in CEB group in 1st hour after activation of the catheter, however no significant difference at other times. Nausea, vomiting, and urine retention occurred exclusively in CEB group. Success in Rehabilitation and duration of hospital stay were comparable between groups. Conclusion: The efficiency of patient-controlled analgesia via CFICB was comparable with that via CEB for pain relief after total knee replacement. Only, CEB was associated with minimal side effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: peripheral nerve blocks were introduced to offer analgesia in hip surgery. Objective: This study compared the analgesic efficacy of combined lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block with pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus fascia iliaca block (FIB) for proximal femur surgery. Patients and Methods: One hundred patients underwent proximal femoral fracture surgeries were equally randomized to either group І: FIB or group ІІ: combined LFCN block with PENG block. The primary outcome was how long it took to perform spinal anesthesia. The secondary outcomes were the assessment of sensory block, VAS during spinal anesthesia, anesthesiologist satisfaction, time to first analgesic request, postoperative pain score and total morphine requirements. Results: The VAS scores did not significantly differ from one another during positioning for spinal anesthesia between two groups. After 15 minutes and 30 min of blocks, VAS score at rest was reduced in group ІІ compared to group І but with no significant difference. The median (VAS) score at rest immediately and one hour at post anesthesia care unit (PACU) was significantly lower in group ІІ compared to group І. Time to first analgesic request, total morphine consumption in the postoperative 24 hours (h) showed no significant statistical difference between both groups. Conclusions: PENG block is an effective and safe practice that could be an alternative to FIB for pain relief and comfort during positioning in patients with proximal femur fractures with preservation of motor function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Knee arthroscopy is one of the most frequently performed interventions in orthopedic surgery that is commonly performed on a day-case basis. It allows the diagnosis and management of a wide range of knee problems without making a large incision, thus decreasing soft tissue trauma. However, postoperative pain is a common upsetting symptom following arthroscopic knee surgery that if inadequately treated, leads to prolonged duration of the functional rehabilitation of the knee, recovery time and the length of hospital stay thus a significant increase in the medical care costs. Aim of the Work: To compare the adjuvant effect of adding dexmedetomidine and/or dexamethasone to bupivacaine while using facsia iliaca block for knee arthroscopy and their efficacy in achieving postoperative analgesia. Patients and Methods: The type of study was a prospective double - blinded randomized controlled Trial conducted in Ain Shams University hospitals, Cairo, Egypt at 6 months. Patients aged 20 to 60 years scheduled for elective knee arthroscopy under spinal anesthesia were included to receive FICB. Results: In general, there was no significant difference between the three study groups regarding general patient characteristics as well as operative time. That ensured proper randomization conducted between our study groups. Additionally, that should nullify any bias that may have skewed the results in favor of one group rather than another one. There was statistically significant difference between groups according to heart rate from after 2hrs to after 24hrs this was also observed while measuring the systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure but there was no significant difference between group B and C. Conclusion: Our study shows that adding Dexmedetomidine and/or Dexamethasone (8mg) to Bupivacaine for FICB significantly prolonged the duration of block and decreased the requirement of rescue analgesics as compared to patients who received Bupivacaine alone. FICB is relatively easy and safe to perform. In our study we did not encounter any complication while doing the procedures and also by adding dexmedetomidine and/or dexamethasone (8mg). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Intertrochanteric fracture surgery is a common orthopedic procedure worldwide, pain may be severe, and the patients generally require a significant amount of opioid-based analgesics after such procedures. Peripheral nerve blocks offer effective analgesia and decrease the need for opioids, thereby reducing the complications associated with the use of this class of drug. Pain management regimens following Intertrochanteric fracture surgery include oral analgesics, periarticular injection, peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs), and intravenous patient- con-trolled analgesia (PCA). Objective: To compare the analgesic efficacy and functional recovery of Fascia iliaca block and FNB in patients who have undergone Hip surgery. Methods: This prospective randomized clinical trial study was conducted in Ain Shams University hospital after approval of the anesthesia department and the local ethics and research committee over 6 months and after obtaining a written informed consent. Sixty patients underwent Intertrochanteric fracture surgery under spinal anaesthesia regarding postoperative pain and early ambulation were included in the study their ages range between 40 to 75 years old and classified as ASA I and II. The patients were randomly divided using computer generated randomization into two groups 30 patients in each (n = 30). Results: The two groups were compared as regard pain control post operatively. Numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to assess pain post operatively and used at regular interval (PACU, After 15min., After 30min., After 45min., After 1hr., After 1.5hrs., After 2hrs., After 4hrs., After 6hrs., After 8hrs., After 10hrs., After 12 hrs., After 14hrs., After 16hrs., After 18 hrs., After 20 hrs., After 22 hrs. and After 24hrs.). And there is no significant difference between two groups, with p- value (p>0.05NS). As regard to total dose of narcotics used in each group, there is no difference in postoperative nalbuphine con-sumption. The two groups are compared as regard to quadriceps weakness, onset of ambulation and there was a significant difference between two groups. Conclusion: Fascia iliaca block is more effective than Femoral Nerve Block in in patient satisfaction for post-operative analgesia and equally effective with femoral nerve block in post-operative ambulation after Intertrochanteric fracture surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Many physicians believe that loco-regional anaesthesia and analgesia improve the postoperative course of patients indicated for total hip arthroplasty compared to general anaesthesia. However, there are many patients who refuse subarachnoid or epidural anaesthesia, or have contraindications or conditions making the use of such techniques impossible. An alternative option is the combination of general anaesthesia and a peripheral nerve blockade. The aim of this prospective randomized open-label clinical trial was to compare the efficacy and quality of postoperative analgesia between fascia iliaca block combined with general anaesthesia (GA) and subarachnoid anaesthesia with morphine and bupivacaine (SAB). MATERIAL AND METHODS After having obtained the ethics committee approval and the patients consent, a prospective, open-label, randomized trial was conducted in patients referred for total hip arthroplasty (THR). The GA group was administered ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca block with 40 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine solution after the induction of general anaesthesia. In the SAB group, subarachnoid blockade was performed with a mixture of 3 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine with 0.150 mg morphine prepared in the hospital pharmacy. Right after surgery the patients were taken to the ICU for 24 hours, after which they were transferred to a general ward. In addition to vital signs monitoring, pain intensity using a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS), first morphine administration at NRS >4, total morphine consumption and potential adverse effects were observed over the period of 72 hours. RESULTS There was no statistical difference between the GA (14 persons) and the SAB (14 persons) group in demographic parameters, time to first morphine administration (10 hrs vs. 19 hrs, p=0.10), number of persons with no need for morphine after surgery (5 vs. 7), tingling sensation (1 vs. 0) or numbness of the limb (0 vs. 1). There was no difference in cardiorespiratory parameters or side effects of therapy. In neither case was there respiratory depression or delayed rehabilitation. No patient developed delirium after surgery, and no patient reported dissatisfaction with pain management. DISCUSSION The fascia iliaca block and subarachnoid anaesthesia using local anaesthetic with opioid addition have been repeatedly published for patients after total hip arthroplasty, but this study is unique by comparing the two methods. The study added a new piece of knowledge to the findings of several recent meta-analyses on the comparable outcomes of general and subarachnoid anaesthesia for hip replacement in the perioperative period. CONCLUSIONS If subarachnoid anaesthesia cannot be used in hip arthroplasty, general anaesthesia with fascia iliaca block provides comparable analgesia and quality of postoperative course. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hip fractures are the most common orthopedic condition in elderly patients. In this patient group, efficient preoperative analgesia that reduces the requirement for opioids and their negative side effects is crucial. This study aims for evaluating the efficiency of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) and pericapsular nerve group (PENG) in providing the appropriate analgesia before positioning patients for spinal anesthesia (SA). Methods: Ninety participants undergoing hip surgeries under SA were selected randomly to receive PENG block (n = 45) using 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine or FICB using 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. The blinded observer assessed Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at rest, with passive leg raise to 15° before and after 30 min of the block. The blinded observer also recorded hemodynamic parameters including noninvasive blood pressure respiratory rate and heart rate. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 19. Using the appropriate statistical methodology, continuous and categorical data were analyzed, and P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: At rest and with a passive leg raise to 15°, VAS scores in the PENG and FICB groups decreased significantly (P < 0.0001). After 30 minutes of performing the PENG block, the VAS scores at rest and passive leg raise were 2.16±0.67 and 3.29±0.73 respectively, whereas with the fascia iliaca block the VAS scores at rest and passive leg raise were 4.07±0.69 and 5.11±0.71 with the p = 0.001, which is highly significant. Conclusion: PENG block outperforms fascia iliaca block in providing effective analgesia before positioning patients undergoing hip surgery under SA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, and complications after fascia iliaca block (FIB) versus control for patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Second, we compared the outcomes of FIB versus placebo. Finally, we sought to evaluate pain and analgesic consumption after preoperative and postoperative FIB. Methods We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov , and CENTRAL through February 2021 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of FIB versus control for patients undergoing primary THA. All analyses were conducted on intent-to-treat data with a random-effects model. Results Twelve RCTs with a total of 815 patients were included. There was no difference in postoperative pain (P = 0.64), analgesic consumption (P = 0.14), or complication rate (P = 0.99) between FIB and control groups. Moreover, no difference in postoperative pain (P = 0.26), analgesic consumption (P = 0.06), or complication rate (P = 0.71) was found between FIB and placebo. Moreover, sensitivity analysis suggested that no significant difference in postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, or complication rate was present between FIB and control in studies that used preoperative and postoperative FIB. Conclusion FIB was not found to be superior to placebo or various anesthetic techniques for patients undergoing primary THA, as measured by postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, and complications.

Heba Nassar,1 Ahmed Hasanin,1 Mahmoud Sewilam,1 Heba Ahmed,1 Mohamed Abo-Elsoud,2 Omar Taalab,2 Ashraf Rady,1 Heba Allah Zoheir1 1Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt; 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cairo University, Cairo, EgyptCorrespondence: Ahmed HasaninDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, 01 Elsarayah Street, Elmanyal, Cairo, 11559, EgyptTel +20 109 507 6954Email ahmedmohamedhasanin@gmail.comBackground: This study aimed to investigate the analgesic efficacy and motor block profile of single-shot transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in comparison with those of suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (FIB) in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.Methods: This randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial included adult patients undergoing hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia. Patients were allocated to one of two groups according to the regional block received: FIB group (n=19) or QLB group (n=17). Both study groups were compared with regard to the duration of analgesia (primary outcome), block performance time, pain during positioning for spinal anesthesia, total morphine consumption in the first postoperative 24-h period, quadriceps muscle power, and static and dynamic visual analog scale.Results: Thirty-six patients were included in the final analysis. Both study groups had comparable durations of analgesia. Postoperative visual analog scale (static and dynamic) values were comparable between the two groups in most readings. The block performance time was shorter in the FIB group. The number of patients with pain during positioning for the subarachnoid block was lower in the QLB group. The total morphine requirement during the first 24 h was marginally lower in the FIB group, whereas the quadriceps motor grade was higher in the FIB group than in the QLB group at 4 h and 6 h after surgery.Conclusion: Both single-shot blocks, namely the suprainguinal FIB and transmuscular QLB, provide effective postoperative analgesia after hip arthroplasty. FIB showed slightly lower 24-h morphine consumption, while QLB showed better quadriceps motor power.Clinical Trial Registration: The study was registered at clinical trials registry system before enrollment of the first participant (NCT04005326; initial release date, 2 July 2019; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04005326).Keywords: quadratus lumborum block, fascia iliaca block, hip arthroplasty

Background and Objectives: The pupillary pain index (PPI) allows the evaluation of intraoperative nociception by measuring pupillary reaction after a localized electrical stimulus. It was the objective of this observational cohort study to investigate the pupillary pain index (PPI) as a method to evaluate the fascia iliaca block (FIB) or adductor canal block (ACB) sensory areas during general anaesthesia in orthopaedic patients with lower-extremity joint replacement surgery. Materials and Methods: Orthopaedic patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty were included. After anaesthesia induction, patients received an ultrasound-guided single-shot FIB or ACB with 30 mL and 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine, respectively. Anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane or propofol/remifentanil. The first PPI measurements were performed after anaesthesia induction and before block insertion, the second at the end of surgery. Pupillometry scores were evaluated in the area of the femoral or saphenous nerve (target) and C3 dermatome (control). Primary outcomes were differences between PPIs before and after peripheral block insertion as well as the relationship between PPIs and postoperative pain scores; secondary outcomes were the relationship between PPIs and opioid requirements after surgery. Results: PPI decreased significantly from the first to the second measurement (4.17 ± 2.7 vs. 1.6 ± 1.2, p < 0.001 for target; 4.46 ± 2.7 vs. 2.17 ± 2.1, p < 0.001 for control). Control and target measurements did not show significant differences. A linear regression analysis showed that early postoperative pain scores could be predicted with intraoperative piritramide with improved prediction after adding PPI scores, PCA opioids and surgery type. Forty-eight-hour pain scores at rest and in movement were correlated with intraoperative piritramide and control PPI after the PNB in movement and with second-postoperative-day opioids and target PPI scores before block insertion, respectively. Conclusions: While the effect of an FIB and ACB could not be shown with PPI postoperative pain scores due to a large effect of opioids, perioperative PPI was shown to be associated with postoperative pain. These results suggest that preoperative PPI may be used to predict postoperative pain.

The local anesthetic volume for a single-shot suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SFIB) is a key factor of a block success because the courses of the three target nerves from the lumbar plexus (LP), the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN), femoral nerve (FN), and obturator nerve (ON), at the inguinal area are isolated and within striking distance. Thus, this cadaveric study aims to demonstrate the distribution of dye staining on the LFCN, FN, ON, and LP following the ultrasound-guided SFIB using 15-50 ml of methylene blue. A total of 40 USG-SFIBs were performed on 20 fresh adult cadavers using 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50 ml of methylene blue. After the injections, the pelvic and inguinal regions were dissected to directly visualize the dye stained on the LFCN, FN, ON, and LP. All FN and LFCN were stained heavily when the 15-50 ml of dye was injected. Higher volumes of dye (40-50 ml) spread more medially and stained on the ON and LP in 60 % of cases. To increase the possibility of dye spreading to all three target nerves and LP of the SFIB, a high volume (³40 ml) of anesthetic is recommended. If only a blockade of the FN and LFCN is required, a low volume (15-25 ml) of anesthetic is sufficient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The goal of ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (USG-SFIB) is anesthetic spread to three nerves, which are lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN), femoral nerve (FN), and obturator nerve (ON). The 90 % minimum effective volume (MEV90) for USG-SFIB is each result of studied showed the successful block and effect in various volume for block. So, Thus, the study purposes to demonstrate the efficiency of the effective volume (MEV90,62.5 ml) for USG-SFIB and confirm the staining of dye in connective tissue of nerve (nerve layer) that focused on the obturator nerve by histological examination in cadavers. The histological result showed the dye staining on the nerve layer of the ON in epineurium (100 %) and un-staining perineurium & endoneurium. Therefore, the minimal effective volume (MEV) is effective for USG-SFIB. Moreover, dye stain at the epineurium of stained obturator nerve only. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Nerve block is a key technique in postoperative analgesia for total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to compare ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SFIB) and anterior quadratus lumborum block (AQLB) in patients undergoing primary THA.Methods: In this prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 100 patients undergoing primary THA under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive an ultrasound-guided SFIB + sham AQLB (SFIB group), or an ultrasound-guided AQLB + sham SFIB (AQLB group). Before wound suture, all patients received periarticular infiltration analgesia which the local anesthetic was injected into joint capsule, exposed gluteal and abductor muscles, peritrochanteric zone, and subcutaneous tissue under the incision as multiple sites. The primary outcome was postoperative morphine consumption within 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes were the time to first rescue analgesia, postoperative pain assessed on the visual analog scale, postoperative quadriceps strength, the time to hospital discharge, and the incidence of postoperative complications.Results: There were no significant differences between the 2 groups concerning morphine consumption within 24 hours after surgery (P = .774), the time to first rescue analgesia (P = .890), the time to hospital discharge (P = .532), and the incidence of postoperative complications (P > .05). The visual analog scale pain scores at rest and during motion also were similar at all time points (P > .05). Significantly more patients in the SFIB group experienced quadriceps muscle weakness at 2 hours (P = .008) and 6 hours (P = .009) after surgery.Conclusion: Under the circumstances of this study, when combined with periarticular infiltration analgesia, the SFIB provided similar pain relief compared with AQLB in patients undergoing THA, but was associated with muscle weakness within 6 hours after surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) is one of the most common congenital heart diseases. This is one such disease where patients largely remain asymptomatic throughout childhood and begin showing symptoms during adulthood. Here, the authors present a case of a 44-year-old male patient, with an uncorrected ASD and poliomyelitis, who presented with fracture femur. He was posted for Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) with plating of femur. The anaesthetic management was successfully done with general anaesthesia through endotracheal intubation along with fascia iliaca block. After the procedure and extubation, the patient was conscious, oriented, responded to commands, and had normal vital parameters. He was shifted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)for further observation and monitoring in view of his pre-existing co-morbid conditions. Postoperatively, cardiovascular surgeon advised a correction surgery for his ASD at a later date. The patient was discharged on Postoperative Day (POD) 12. Dealing with these two vastly different disease entities in the same patient certainly posed a unique aspect to the present case considering the fact that there was no prior literature regarding the same.

Successful postoperative pain control is one of the keys on the patients' recovery after surgery, especially in the hip fracture and hip reconstruction surgery. Currently, the concept on pain management with multimodal analgesia and regional anesthesia plays a key role for postoperative analgesia and has demonstrated the ability of enhancing postoperative recovery, reducing opioids consumption, and decreasing the time to mobilization. Nonetheless, the development of new regional analgesic techniques has evolved in the past four decades and can be intimidating to the general anesthesiologists. Therefore, the present article aimed to provide a concise review of the hip innervation and the current regional analgesic techniques as a practical guide for the perioperative pain management after hip surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Melaku Bantie,1 Simeneh Mola,2 Timsel Girma,2 Zemedu Aweke,2 Derartu Neme,2 Abebayehu Zemedkun2 1Debre Berhan University, College of Medicine and Health Science, Debre Birhan, Ethiopia; 2Dilla University, College of Medicine and Health Science, Dilla, EthiopiaCorrespondence: Simeneh MolaDilla University, College of Medicine and Health Science, Dilla 0419/13, EthiopiaTel +251 901091414Email ksimenehmola@yahoo.comBackground: Femoral fracture is the most painful bone injury and performing spinal anesthesia is extremely challenging due to very poor positioning unless we have a very good mode of analgesia. Intravenous strong opioids are commonly used but to date nerve blocks are also being utilized. The reliability and effectiveness of the aforementioned methods are not conclusive to practice worldwide. The objective of the study was to compare the analgesic effect of intravenous fentanyl, femoral nerve block (FNB) and fascia iliaca block (FICB) during positioning patients with femoral fracture for spinal anesthesia.Methods: A randomized controlled trial study was conducted on 72 elective adult patients with femoral fracture aged 18– 65 years and ASA I and II those were allocated randomly into three groups. The intravenous fentanyl (IVFE) group received 1μg/kg IV fentanyl, FNB group received nerve stimulator guided FNB with 30 mL of 1% lidocaine with adrenaline and FICB group received FICB with 30 mL of 1% lidocaine with adrenaline. Pain intensity in numeric rating score (NRS), time to perform spinal anesthesia, quality of positioning and patient acceptance were assessed. SPSS version 26 and Kruskal–Wallis test were used to analyze data and p value < 0.05 was considered significant.Results: NRS Pain score during positioning was significantly lower in FNB and FICB groups than IVFE group [median (IQR)]; 2 (1– 2.5), 2 (2– 3)) vs. 3 (3– 4) respectively; P< 0.001 and P=0.001. However, FNB and FICB groups were not significantly different with (P=1.000). Time to perform spinal anesthesia was significantly longer in IVFE group 9.5 (9– 10) minutes than both FNB and FICB groups 7 (6– 8), 8 (6– 8) respectively, P< 0.001. The quality of positioning was significantly lower in the IVFE group than both FNB and FICB groups (P< 0.001).Conclusion: Preoperative FNB and FICB reduce pain score during positioning, shorten time to perform spinal anesthesia, better patient positioning and higher patient acceptance in a patient undergoing elective femoral bone fracture surgery.Trial Registration: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry, PACTR202006669166858, registered on June 19, 2020. https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=12127.Keywords: femoral nerve block; FNB, fascia iliaca block; FICB, intravenous fentanyl, spinal anesthesia positioning, femoral fracture

Sachi Shah, Arpit Patel, Baseem Choudhry, Michael Thilagarajah Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Darent Valley Hospital, Dartford DA2 8DA, UKCorrespondence: Sachi ShahDepartment of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Darent Valley Hospital, Darenth Wood Road, Dartford DA2 8DA, UKEmail sachi.shah@nhs.netBackground: There are 75,000 neck of femur (NOF) fractures that occur each year in England and Wales. Prompt, adequate analgesia is a major priority in hip fracture management to reduce the risk of delirium and facilitate earlier return to mobility and independence. NICE guidelines recommend the use of fascia iliaca block (FIB) for NOF fracture patients. Current literature suggests that FIB significantly improves pre-operative pain scores; however despite this, the uptake of FIB still varies between centers.Objective: The study aimed to review pre-operative analgesia management of NOF patients in our center. The primary endpoint was to improve uptake of regional fascia iliaca block (FIB) in NOF patients by means of an educational e-learning tool.Study Design and Methods: We performed a prospective review of all patients with NOF fractures admitted via the emergency department from September to October 2018 in a single district general hospital in the UK. We recorded patient demographics, time of admission, grade of physician performing block and pain scores and total FIB uptake. A multidisciplinary-led, short interventional training program of FIB administration was then developed and delivered to all relevant staff. Pain management and pain scores were recorded in a second prospective cycle along with uptake of FIB.Results: There was a 53.2% reduction in pain score in the group that received FIB compared to 26.7% in patients who received oral analgesia only, consistent with current literature (p value = 0.0046). There was a significant increase (2.66x) in FIB administration by orthopedic doctors (27.3% in cycle 1 to 100% in cycle 2) after the educational session intervention.Conclusion: This study shows that with the use of an educational training tool, all members of the multidisciplinary team can successfully administer FIB without any complications. Our educational tool has enabled a significant increase in delivery of FIB.Keywords: multidisciplinary, fascia iliaca block, neck of femur fracture, emergency medicine, orthogeriatrics, orthopaedics, pain management

Objective: This retrospective study aimed to compare rates of perioperative mortality and morbidity, especially pulmonary complication, between endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) performed under general anesthesia (GA) and under fascia iliaca block (FIB)., Methods: Patients diagnosed with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) who were treated with EVAR were included. Retrospective review of electronic medical records was performed. Patient characteristics, operative details, and postoperative results including mortality and morbidity within 30 days were collected. Statistical analysis to compare postoperative outcomes between EVAR under FIB and EVAR under GA was performed. A univariate analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with increased 30-day mortality., Results: This study included 119 patients, 75 in the FIB group and 44 in the GA group. Most patients were male, with 62 (82.5%) in the FIB group and 31 (70.2%) in the GA group, and most patients were hypertensive, with 57 (76%) in the FIB group and 36 (81.8%) in the GA group. Smoking and coronary artery disease (CAD) was more prevalent in the FIB group, p < .05. Thirty-day mortality was not significantly different between the FIB group and the GA group (1 (1.3%) vs 2 (4.5%), p = .554). Pulmonary complication was lower in the FIB group than in the GA group (1.3% vs 11.4%, p = .026). ICU stay was shorter in the FIB group than in the GA group (0.2 vs 4.5 days, p = .012). Univariate analysis showed that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was associated with higher 30-day mortality., Conclusions: Endovascular aneurysm repair under FIB was feasible. Compared to GA, this approach resulted in lower postoperative pulmonary complications and shorter ICU stay., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: The most common approach to managing severe pain following femoral fracture is with intravenous systemic analgesics, such as opioid analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs associated with side effects such as respiratory depression, nausea, and vomiting. These side effects might be intolerable in trauma patients and may result in under treatment of pain. Improving the quality of analgesia may reduce these intolerable side effects. Our study compared the efficacy of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) with intravenous analgesics for preoperative pain management of femoral fractures., Patients and Methods: The study was a quality improvement prospective randomised study, where 50 patients aged between 18 and 65 years, and American society of anesthesiologists I and II were recruited into two groups. Group A received FICB with a combination of 0.4 mL/kg of 0.5% plain bupivacaine and adrenaline 1:200,000 made up to 30 mL, while group B received placebo FICB using 30 mL normal saline. Also, group B received a combination of intravenous paracetamol 15 mg/kg not exceeding 900 mg and tramadol 1 mg/kg not exceeding 100 mg, while group A received an equal volume as normal saline intravenously., Results: The study revealed no significant difference in age, gender, associated injuries, X-ray description of fractures, and mechanism of injuries; however, there was a significant difference in the NRS-pain score at 30 min, summed pain intensity difference for 4 h and patient satisfaction in the FICB group compared to the standard group., Conclusion: The study revealed that FICB results in better pain control compared to a combination of intravenous tramadol and paracetamol in patients with femoral fractures., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2024 Journal of the west African college of surgeons.)

Background: Hip fracture surgeries in elderly patients often require spinal or general anesthesia, posing risks of severe hypotension and inadequate pain management. The optimal anesthesia type for minimizing these risks remains undetermined. Preliminary studies suggest that a combination of fascia iliaca block (FIB) and low-dose low-specific-gravity spinal anesthesia (LLSA) might offer a solution, but comprehensive evidence is lacking., Objectives: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of combining FIB with LLSA for reducing severe hypotension and enhancing analgesia during hip fracture surgery in elderly patients., Study Design: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted., Setting: An operating theatre of a tertiary hospital., Methods: The study comprised 68 patients. They were separated into 2 equal parallel groups 34 patients each: the FIB+LLSA group and the general anesthesia (GA) group. Patients aged 75-96 undergoing primary hip arthroplasty for hip fracture were randomized to receive either FIB+LLSA or GA. The primary outcome was the incidence of severe hypotension; secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, use of rescue analgesia, vasopressor dosage, and complications., Results: We found a significantly lower incidence of severe hypotension in the FIB+LLSA group compared to the GA group (32.4% vs 67.6%). Additionally, postoperative pain scores were significantly lower, and the need for rescue analgesia was reduced in the FIB+LLSA group. Vasopressor use during surgery was also significantly lower in the FIB+LLSA group. The hospital stay was shorter in the FIB+LLSA group, with an average of 5.9 days compared to 6.7 days in the GA group., Limitations: The study's limitations include its single-center nature, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the inability to conduct a double-blind study could introduce biases, though measures were taken to minimize this. The sample size might not be sufficient to determine the broader implications of LLSA., Conclusions: Combining FIB with LLSA for elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery significantly reduces the incidence of severe intraoperative hypotension and postoperative pain. It also decreases the need for rescue analgesia and shortens hospital stays, suggesting that FIB+LLSA could be a beneficial regional anesthesia technique for elderly hip fracture surgery patients, aligning with enhanced recovery protocols.

Background: Various analgesic modalities have been used to improve postoperative pain in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. Purpose: To systematically review the literature to compare the efficacy of the fascia iliaca block (FIB) with that of other analgesic modalities after hip arthroscopy in terms of postoperative pain scores and analgesic consumption. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase up to April 2020 to identify randomized controlled trials that compared postoperative pain and analgesic consumption in patients after hip arthroscopy with FIB versus other pain control modalities. The search phrase used was "hip arthroscopy fascia iliaca randomized." Patients were evaluated based on postoperative pain scores and total postoperative analgesic consumption. Results: Five studies (3 level 1, 2 level 2) were identified that met inclusion criteria, including 157 patients undergoing hip arthroscopy with FIB (mean age, 38.3 years; 44.6% men) and 159 patients among the following comparison groups: lumbar plexus block (LPB), intra-articular ropivacaine (IAR), local anesthetic infiltration (LAI), saline placebo, and a no-block control group (overall mean age, 36.2 years; 36.5% men). No significant differences in pain scores were reported in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) between the FIB and LPB (3.4 vs 2.9; P =.054), IAR (7.7 vs 7.9; P =.72), control group (no FIB: 4.1 vs 3.8; P =.76); or saline placebo (difference, –0.2 [95% CI, –1.1 to 0.7]). One study reported significantly higher pain scores at 1 hour postoperation in the FIB group compared with the LAI group (5.5 vs 3.4; P =.02). Another study reported significantly greater total analgesic consumption (in morphine equivalent dosing) in the PACU among the FIB group compared with the LPB group (20.8 vs 17.0; P =.02). No significant differences were observed in total PACU analgesic consumption between FIB and other analgesic modalities. Conclusion: In patients undergoing hip arthroscopy, the FIB does not appear to demonstrate superiority to other forms of analgesics in the immediate postoperative period. Therefore, it is not recommended as a routine form of pain control for these procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives: To compare the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound‐guided fascia iliaca block (FIB) insertion in patients with fractured neck of femur by trained emergency nurses with insertion by doctors. Background: The FIB is an effective and safe form of analgesia for patients with hip fracture presenting to the emergency department (ED). While it has traditionally been inserted by medical doctors, no evidence exists comparing the effectiveness and safety of FIB insertion by nurses compared with doctors. Design: A prospective cohort study. Methods: The study was conducted in an Australian metropolitan ED. Patients admitted to the ED with suspected or confirmed fractured neck of femur had a FIB inserted under ultrasound guidance by either a trained emergency nurse or doctor. A retrospective medical record audit was undertaken of consecutive ED patients presenting between January 2013–December 2017. Reporting of this study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines for cohort studies. Results: Of the 472 patients eligible for a FIB, 322 (68%) had one inserted. A majority were inserted by doctors (n = 207, 64.3%) with 22.4% (n = 72) by nurses and in 13.3% (n = 43) of patients the clinician was not documented. There were no differences between the nurse‐inserted and doctor‐inserted groups for mean pain scores 1 hr post‐FIB insertion; clinically significant reduction (≥30%) in pain score 1 hr post‐FIB insertion; pain score 4 hr post‐FIB insertion; delirium incidence; opioid use post‐FIB insertion; or time to FIB insertion. No adverse events were identified in either group. Conclusion: Insertion of FIBs by trained emergency nurses is as effective and safe as insertion by doctors in patients with fractured neck of femur in the ED. Senior emergency nurses should routinely be inserting FIB as a form of analgesia for patients with hip fracture. Relevance to clinical practice: Our study showed trained emergency nurses can safely and effectively insert fascia iliaca blocks in patients with hip fractures. Pain was significantly reduced in a majority of patients with no reported complications. Emergency nurses should be trained to insert fascia iliaca blocks in patients with hip fractures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, and complications after fascia iliaca block (FIB) versus control for patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Second, we compared the outcomes of FIB versus placebo. Finally, we sought to evaluate pain and analgesic consumption after preoperative and postoperative FIB. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and CENTRAL through February 2021 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of FIB versus control for patients undergoing primary THA. All analyses were conducted on intent-to-treat data with a random-effects model. Results: Twelve RCTs with a total of 815 patients were included. There was no difference in postoperative pain (P = 0.64), analgesic consumption (P = 0.14), or complication rate (P = 0.99) between FIB and control groups. Moreover, no difference in postoperative pain (P = 0.26), analgesic consumption (P = 0.06), or complication rate (P = 0.71) was found between FIB and placebo. Moreover, sensitivity analysis suggested that no significant difference in postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, or complication rate was present between FIB and control in studies that used preoperative and postoperative FIB. Conclusion: FIB was not found to be superior to placebo or various anesthetic techniques for patients undergoing primary THA, as measured by postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, and complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Delirium in elderly orthopaedic patients poses an enormous medical, social and financial burden to the healthcare system, and causes significant distress to patients and their caregivers. We examined whether a Multi-component Care Bundle (MCB) could reduce the incidence of post-operative delirium (POD) in fractured hip patients. Methods: An observational study was conducted, analyzing 154 patients (mean age ± SD, 85 ± 7.8, 68% women) admitted to Queen Mary Hospital with hip fracture. Half of the patients were cared for in the control group before MCB was introduced, which included installation of orientation aids, introduction of a Caregiver Empowerment Program, and incorporation of ultrasound-guided Fascia Iliaca Block (FIB) into the analgesia protocol. Results: There were fewer patients with POD in the MCB group, compared with the control group (18/76, 23.4% v 34/76, 44.2%, p = 0.006). Patients in MCB group consumed less opioid ( 4/77 v 13/77, p = 0.048), experienced less postoperative dizziness (2/77, 2.6% v 13/77, 16.9%, p = 0.003) and had a shorter median day to start walking post-operatively (day 1 [IQR 1-2] vs day 2 [IQR 2-3]; p = 0.001) than the control group. Length of stay was not affected. Conclusion: MCB effectively reduces POD, postoperative dizziness, opioid consumption, and days to start mobilization postoperatively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) is one of the most common congenital heart diseases. This is one such disease where patients largely remain asymptomatic throughout childhood and begin showing symptoms during adulthood. Here the authors present a case of a 44-year-old patient, with an uncorrected ASD and poliomyelitis, who presented with fracture femur. He was posted for Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) with plating of femur. The anaesthetic management was successfully done with general anaesthesia through endotracheal intubation along with fascia iliaca block. After the procedure and extubation, the patient was conscious, oriented, responded to commands, and had normal vital parameters. He was shifted to the Intensive Care Unit(ICU) for further observation and monitoring in view of his pre-existing co-morbid conditions. Postoperatively, cardiovascular surgeon advised a correction surgery for his ASD at a later date. The patient was discharged on Postoperative Day(POD) 12. Dealing with these two vastly different disease entities in the same patient certainly posed a unique aspect to this case considering the fact that there was no prior literature regarding the same. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents the cases of a 76-year-old woman who was presented for elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) for right hip osteoarthritis and a 69-year-old male who was presented for right THA for chronic hip pain to discuss quadratus lumborum (QL) block as a rescue block following THA. The patients were rushed to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) with substantial postsurgical pain.

Background: Whether nerve block improves the quality of conscious sedation (CS) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is unclear. This study investigated whether fascia iliaca block (FIB) reduced the remifentanil requirement and relieved pain in CS for TAVI., Methods and results: This prospective study randomized 72 patients scheduled for elective TAVI under CS into 2 groups, with (FIB) and without (control) FIB (n=36 in each group). The sedation targeted a Bispectral Index <90 with a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale of -2 to -1. Dexmedetomidine (0.7 µg/kg, i.v.) combined with remifentanil (0.03 µg/kg/min, i.v.) and propofol (0.3 mg/kg/h, i.v.) was used to commence sedation. FIB using 30 mL of 0.185% ropivacaine was implemented 2 min before TAVI. Patient sedation was maintained with dexmedetomidine (0.4 µg/kg/h, i.v.) supplemented with remifentanil (0-0.02 µg/kg/min, i.v.). Remifentanil (20 µg, i.v.) was used as a rescue dose for intraprocedural pain. Compared with the control group, FIB reduced the both the total (median [interquartile range] 83.0 [65.0-98.0] vs. 34.5 [26.0/45.8)] µg; P<0.001) and continuous (25.3 [20.9/31.5] vs. 9.5 [6.8/12.5] ng/kg/min; P<0.001) doses of remifentanil administered., Conclusions: FIB reduced the remifentanil requirement and relieved pain in patients undergoing TAVI with CS. Therefore, FIB improved the quality of CS in TAVI.

Background: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a well-established surgical treatment for hip dysplasia, but very few studies report the impact of peri-operative management strategies on early pain and function. The purpose of this study is to describe peri-operative management variability among a group of experienced surgeons and review the literature supporting these practice patterns., Methods: We surveyed 16 surgeons that perform PAO to document various aspects of peri-operative management at four stages: pre-operative, intra-operative, post-operative in the hospital, and at discharge. Our goal was to report current surgical pain management strategies, adjunct medications, type of anesthesia, deep venous thrombosis and heterotopic ossification prophylaxis strategies, initiation of physical therapy, and use of continuous passive motion (CPM). We reviewed current literature to identify studies supporting these perioperative strategies and identify knowledge gaps that would benefit from further investigation., Results: Of the 16 surgeons surveyed, 75% had been in practice greater than 10 years and most had not altered their post-operative protocol for more than 3 years. 15/16 surgeons felt that length of stay could be reduced at their institution with improved peri-operative pain management. 6/16 were considering or had already implemented outpatient PAO as a part of their practice. We found significant variability in the pain medications provided at all peri-operative stages. 14/16 utilized general anesthesia, and many utilized epidural or peripheral nerve blocks. 6/16 surgeons utilized surgical field block (also referred to as periarticular block). These surgeons advocated that surgical field block was an effective intervention with no/minimal complication risk. There is very little literature critically evaluating efficacy of these perioperative management strategies for PAO., Conclusion: There is significant practice variability in peri-operative management of PAO surgery. We report various strategies utilized by a group of experienced surgeons and review supporting literature. There are significant knowledge gaps in best surgical pain management strategies, adjunct medications, surgical field blocks, and use of CPM that need further investigation. Level of Evidence: IV ., Competing Interests: Disclosures: The authors report no potential conflicts of interest related to this study., (Copyright © The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal 2024.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative fascia iliaca block (FIB) as a sole anesthetic technique in transfemoral thromboembolectomy of unilateral acute lower limb ischemia compared to unilateral spinal anesthesia (SA) as a primary outcome. Hemodynamic variation, postoperative pain score, and the first demand for analgesia with the total postoperative analgesic required in the 1st postoperative day were considered as the secondary outcome. Patients and Methods: This prospective randomized controlled study included two groups of patients aged between 40 and 70 years, who underwent transfemoral thrombectomy for acute unilateral lower limb ischemia. Patients in the spinal group (SA) (n = 56): underwent unilateral SA using 10 mg bupivacaine 0.5% and patients in the group FIB (n = 56): received FIB with 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. Sensory block was evaluated over the incisional area with 3-point scale. If the sensory block did not reach zero grade after 30 min, the patient received general anesthesia. Results: The incidence of the successful block was 100% in the SA group compared to 80.35% in the FIB group. There was a significant decrease in recorded heart rate and mean blood pressure within the SA group at 3, 10, and 20 min and 3, 20, and 45 min, respectively. Values of visual analog scale decreased significantly in SA group compared to that of the FIB group immediately and 1 h postoperative. However, the time for the first postoperative analgesic requirement and morphine consumption was comparable between the groups. Conclusion: Preoperative FIB could be considered as a promising alternative anesthetic technique to SA with better hemodynamic parameters in patients undergoing transfemoral thrombectomy for acute lower limb ischemia. It could be also due to limited precautions considered the first choice over SA for patients on perioperative anticoagulants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Each year, over 300,000 individuals aged 65 and older are hospitalized for hip fractures in the United States.1 Traditional pain management in the elderly population is difficult because of physiologic changes and comorbidities.2 Peripheral nerve blocks are often placed by anesthesia professionals following hip surgery as part of a multi modal pain management program. Recently, the placement of fascia iliacal blocks has been successfully utilized in the emergency department for geriatric patients suffering from hip fractures. This technique can be easily mastered with proper training for use in the emergency department and pre-hospital environments reducing the pain of hip fracture and its associated risks of morbidity. This article provides a detailed review of anatomy and an ultrasound-guided technique for placement of the fascia iliaca block. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study compares Fascia Iliaca compartment (FI) block and Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block for hip surgery., Methods: Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane were systematically searched in April 2022. Inclusion criteria were: Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs); comparing PENG block versus FI block for hip surgery; patients over 18 years of age; and reporting outcomes immediately postoperative. We excluded studies with overlapped populations and without a head-to-head comparison of the PENG block vs. FI block. Mean-Difference (MD) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were pooled. Trial Sequential Analyses (TSA) were performed to assess inconsistency. Quality assessment and risk of bias were performed according to Cochrane recommendations., Results: Eight RCTs comprising 384 patients were included, of whom 196 (51%) underwent PENG block. After hip surgery, PENG block reduced static pain score at 12h post-surgery (MD = 0.61 mm; 95% CI 1.12 to -0.09; p = 0.02) and cumulative postoperative oral morphine consumption in the first 24h (MD = -6.93 mg; 95% CI -13.60 to -0.25; p = 0.04) compared with the FI group. However, no differences were found between the two techniques regarding dynamic and static pain scores at 6 h or 24 h post-surgery, or in the time to the first analgesic rescue after surgery., Conclusion: The findings suggest that PENG block reduced opioid consumption in the first 24 h after surgery and reduced pain scores at rest at 12 h post-surgery. Further research is needed to fully understand the effects of the PENG block and its potential benefits compared to FI block., Prospero Registration: CRD42022339628 PROSPERO REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display&#95;record.php?RecordID=339628., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier España S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Introduction and Objectives: Data on the efficacy of PENG (Pericapsular Nerve Group) block in hip trauma pain are scarce. We hypothesized that PENG block was more effective than infra-inguinal ultrasound-guided FIB (Fascia Iliaca block) for pain control in patients aged 65 years or older presenting in the emergency room (ER) with traumatic proximal femoral fracture., Materials and Methods: We conducted an exploratory, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. One anaesthesiologist performed the block and another assessed outcomes. Patients were randomly allocated to the PENG group (20 ml ropivacaine 0.375%) or the infrainguinal FIB group (40 ml ropivacaine 0.2%). Standard hypothesis tests (t test or χ 2 test) were performed to analyse baseline characteristics and outcome parameters. The primary end-point of the study was analgesic success, defined as "NRS pain score ≤ 4" 30 min after blockade, with PENG vs to FIB. Secondary outcomes were pain at rest ("pain at rest NRS score ≤ 4" 30 min after blockade), duration of analgesia (time to first request for analgesia), need for rescue medication in case of block failure, and complications during blockade., Results: After obtaining ethical committee approval and written informed consent, 60 patients were included. The primary endpoint was achieved in 16 out of 30 patients (53.3%) in the PENG group and in 15 out of 28 patients (53.6%) in the FIB group. Comparison between groups did not show superiority of the PENG vs FIB (P-value .98)., Conclusions: PENG block does not provide better pain than FIB in proximal femoral fracture in elderly patients treated in the ER., (Copyright © 2023 Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)