Search

STUDY QUESTION What is the risk of an undetected natural conception pregnancy during luteal phase ovarian stimulation, and how does it impact the pregnancy's course? SUMMARY ANSWER The risk for an undetected, natural conception pregnancy in luteal phase ovarian stimulation is low and it appears that ovarian stimulation is unlikely to harm the pregnancy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Random start ovarian stimulation appears to be similarly effective as early follicular stimulation start; and it allows ovarian stimulation to be started independent of the cycle day and throughout the cycle, in accordance with the patients' and clinics' schedule as long as there is no intention of a fresh embryo transfer in the same cycle. Starting ovarian stimulation in the luteal phase bears the possibility of an—at the timepoint of stimulation start—undetected, natural conception pregnancy that has already occurred. There is scarce data on the incidence of this event as well as on the possible implications of ovarian stimulation on the course of an existing pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This retrospective observational study, performed between June 2017 and January 2024, analyzed luteal phase stimulations, in which a natural conception pregnancy was detected during the ovarian stimulation treatment for IVF/ICSI. Luteal phase stimulation was defined as ovarian stimulation started after ovulation and before the next expected menstrual bleeding, with a serum progesterone (P4) level of >1.5 ng/ml on the day of stimulation start or 1 day before. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Women who underwent a luteal phase ovarian stimulation in a tertiary referral ART center. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE A total of 488 luteal phase stimulation cycles were included in the analysis. Luteal phase stimulation was only started after a negative serum hCG measurement on the day or 1 day before commencement of ovarian stimulation. Ten patients (2.1%) had an undetected natural conception pregnancy at the time of luteal phase stimulation start. Eight of these patients underwent an ovarian stimulation in a GnRH-antagonist protocol and two in a progestin-primed stimulation protocol (PPOS). Recombinant FSH was used as stimulation medication for all patients, the patients with a PPOS protocol received additional recombinant LH. One pregnancy (0.2%) was detected after the oocyte retrieval, the other nine pregnancies were detected either due to persistent high serum progesterone levels or due to an increasing progesterone level after an initial decrease before oocyte retrieval. In the cycles with an undetected natural conception pregnancy, the median number of stimulation days was 8 days (range: 6–11 days) and median serum hCG at detection of pregnancy was 59 IU hCG (range: 14.91–183.1). From 10 patients with a pregnancy, three patients delivered a healthy baby, two patients had ongoing pregnancies at the time of summarizing the data, three patients had biochemical pregnancies (patient age: 30, 39, and 42 years), one patient had an ectopic pregnancy which required a salpingectomy, and one patient (age: 34 years) had an early pregnancy loss. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The retrospective study design and the small sample size can limit the accuracy of the estimates. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Overall, there is a small risk of undetected natural conception pregnancies when luteal phase stimulation is undertaken. It appears that there are no adverse effects through either direct effect on the embryo or indirectly through a detrimental effect on the corpus luteum function on the pregnancy in our cohort. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study did not receive funding. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate whether trigger and oocyte collection at a smaller follicle size decreases the risk of premature ovulation while maintaining the reproductive potential of oocytes in women with a severely diminished ovarian reserve undergoing modified natural‐cycle in‐vitro fertilization. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study including women who had at least one unsuccessful cycle (due to no response) of conventional ovarian stimulation with a high dosage of gonadotropins and subsequently underwent a modified natural cycle with a solitary growing follicle (i.e. only one follicle > 10 mm at the time of trigger). The association between follicle size at trigger and various cycle outcomes was tested using regression analyses. Results: A total of 160 ovarian stimulation cycles from 110 patients were included in the analysis. Oocyte pick‐up (OPU) was performed in 153 cycles and 7 cycles were canceled due to premature ovulation. Patients who received their trigger at smaller follicle sizes (≤ 15 mm) had significantly lower rates of premature ovulation and thus higher rates of OPU (98.9% vs 90.8%; odds ratio, 9.56 (95% CI, 1.58–182.9); P = 0.039) compared with those who received their trigger at larger follicle sizes (> 15 mm). On multivariable analysis, smaller follicle sizes at trigger (> 10 to 13 mm, > 13 to 15 mm, > 15 mm to 17 mm) were not associated significantly with a lower rate of cumulus–oocyte complex (COC) retrieval, metaphase‐II (MII) oocytes or blastulation when compared to the > 17‐mm group. On sensitivity analysis including only the first cycle of each couple, the maturity rate among those with COC retrieval was highest in follicle sizes > 15 to 17 mm (92.3%) and > 13 to 15 mm (91.7%), followed by > 10 to 13 mm (85.7%) and lowest in the > 17‐mm group (58.8%). During the study period, five euploid blastocysts developed from 48 fertilized MII oocytes with follicle sizes of 12 mm (n = 3), 14 mm (n = 1) and 16 mm (n = 1) at trigger. Of those, four were transferred and resulted in two live births, both of which developed from follicles with a size at trigger of 12 mm. Conclusions: The ideal follicle size for triggering oocyte maturation may be smaller in women with a severely diminished ovarian reserve managed on a modified natural cycle when compared to conventional cut‐offs. The risk of OPU cancellation was significantly higher in women triggered at follicle size > 15 mm and the yield of mature oocytes was not adversely affected in women triggered at follicle size > 13 to 15 mm compared with > 15 to 17 mm. Waiting for follicles to reach sizes > 17mm may be detrimental to achieving optimal outcome. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To determine the incidence and severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high responders (25–35 follicles with a diameter of ≥12 mm on day of triggering) who received a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to trigger final follicular maturation. We used individual data from women who participated in four different clinical trials and were high responders to ovarian stimulation in a GnRH antagonist protocol in this retrospective combined analysis. All women were evaluated for signs and symptoms of OHSS using identical criteria based on Golan's system (1989). High responders (n = 77) were of different ethnicities. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between women with or without signs and symptoms of OHSS. Mean ± standard deviation baseline data were: age, 32.3 ± 3.5 years; anti-Müllerian hormone, 42.4 ± 20.7 pmol/L; antral follicle count, 21.5 ± 9.2. Before triggering, duration of stimulation was 9.5 ± 1.6 days and the mean number of follicles with a diameter of ≥12 mm and ≥17 mm was 26.5 ± 4.4 and 8.8 ± 4.7, respectively. Mean serum estradiol (17,159 pmol/l) and progesterone (5.1 nmol/l) levels were high at 36 h after triggering. Overall, 17/77 high responders (22%) developed signs and symptoms of mild OHSS which lasted 6–21 days. The most frequently prescribed medication was cabergoline to prevent worsening of OHSS. No severe OHSS occurred and no OHSS cases were reported as serious adverse events. High responders receiving GnRH agonist for triggering should be informed that they may experience signs and symptoms of mild OHSS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective of the study was to study the effect of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) performed at blastocyst stage on the levels of first trimester biomarkers. Methods: This is an observational, collaborative, retrospective study. Seven hundred and twenty-eight patients were included in the study. Patients were with singleton pregnancies resulting from either natural conception (NC), or assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs) with PGT-A and frozen embryo transfer (FET) (ART/PGT-A/FET) or after ART without PGT-A and fresh ET (ART/no PGT-A/fresh ET) or FET (ART/no PGT-A/FET), who had first trimester combined screening test between 11 and 14 gestational weeks. They were stratified into four groups: group A (ART/PGT-A/FET) – 143 patients; group B (ART/no PGT-A/FET) – 100 patients; group C (ART/no PGT-A/fresh ET) – 346 patients, and group D (NC) – 139 patients. Results: Statistically significant differences among the examined groups were observed for maternal age, BMI, ethnicity, and parity. The median placenta-associated plasma protein (PAPPA) was lowest in the group with ART/PGT-A/FET and the highest result was obtained in the group with ART/no PGT-A/FET. Statistically significant difference in the median PAPP-A levels was identified among the examined groups (p = .0186). When a subgroup analysis was performed, a statistically significant difference was observed in the median PAPP-A between ART/ PGT-A/FET group versus ART/no PGT-A/FET group (p = .01) and NC versus ART/no PGT-A/FET (p = .01). A similar trend toward statistical significance was noted when comparing NC versus ART/no PGT-A/fresh ET (p = .06). Multivariate analysis elucidated that when age is present in the model, the effect of any method of conception or testing for aneuploidy disappears. The other factors (BMI, ethnicity, and parity) do not influence the levels of PAPP-A. The lowest median free human chorionic gonadotropin (b-HCG) was recorded in the NC group and the highest result was identified in the group with IVF/PGT-A/FET. No statistically significant difference was observed in the median concentration levels of free b-hCG among the compared groups (p = .5789) and when subgroup analysis was performed (p>.05). The normality of the distribution of variables was analyzed by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and the median PAPP-A and free bhCG concentration difference by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test with nonparametric ANOVA. Conclusions: Testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and the decision to transfer either fresh or cryopreserved embryos (ET) appear not to affect the levels of first trimester biochemical markers. The findings of the present study should be a baseline for future studies and could be used to improve the antenatal screening counseling for women with ART pregnancies and PGT-A. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]