Search

Objective To better understand the feasibility of using imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, to treat active diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc). Methods We performed a 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept pilot study of imatinib in patients with active dcSSc. Data on safety, modified Rodnan skin thickness scores (MRSS), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores, patient's and physician's global assessments (100-mm visual analog scale), and biomarkers in serum and skin biopsy samples were collected. We used a 4:1 randomization strategy (imatinib 200 mg administered twice a day versus placebo), stratifying according to current use of methotrexate. The plan was to enroll 20 dcSSc patients. Results After enrolling 10 patients (9 receiving active drug and 1 receiving placebo), we found poor tolerability and high rates of adverse events with imatinib, and study enrollment was discontinued. There was no significant difference in the mean MRSS in all patients who took imatinib (31.1 at baseline versus 29.4 at 6 months) or in only those who completed 6 months of imatinib (31.0 at baseline versus 30.3 at 6 months), and there was no difference in the C-reactive protein level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, physician's global assessment, patient's global assessment, response to the Health Transition query, or the HAQ scores between those who did and those who did not complete 6 months of therapy. Side effects were edema, fluid retention, fatigue, nausea, cramps/myalgias, diarrhea, alopecia, and anemia. Most side effects occurred within the first week of treatment, and even when imatinib was reintroduced at a lower dosage (200 mg daily), it was poorly tolerated. Two patients were hospitalized because of side effects of the medication. In general, biomarker levels in plasma and skin did not change. Conclusion Imatinib was poorly tolerated, and this could limit its application in SSc. The study was too small to form conclusions about the efficacy of imatinib in SSc.

Objective To prospectively evaluate consecutive patients with knee osteoarthritis who presented to a Canadian community rheumatology clinic and determine the prevalence of varus deformities of the knees and the incidence of forefoot overpronation in three ethnically different populations-a Canadian-born population, Indian-born population and Portuguese-born population. Use of different therapies for knee osteoarthritis in the clinic was also evaluated. Methods Data were collected on patient age, sex, body mass index (BMI), visual analog scale (VAS) pain, ethnic background, valgus/varus deformity at the knee and overpronation of the forefoot. Kellgren-Lawrence scores were assigned to plain radiographs. Charts were subsequently reviewed to evaluate rates of intra-articular steroid injection, hyaluronic injection, surgical referral and surgical referral in the first year after being seen in the clinic. Results Eight patients who were Portuguese-born, 26 who were Indian-born and 33 who were Canadian-born were identified. Age was not significantly different. Women had more valgus changes than men ( P = 0.04), and VAS pain was not significantly different between men and women. Significantly more varus deformity was noted in the Indian-born group than the Canadian-born group (P =0.002), and more valgus deformity was noted in the Portuguese-born than Canadian-born group ( P = 0.009). There was a trend to lower BMI in the Punjabi-born group and lower VAS pain in the Canadian-born group. There was no significant correlation between BMI and VAS pain, nor age and VAS pain (r =−0.192 and −0.050 respectively). There was no significant association with either BMI or age and forefoot overpronation. No ethnicity differences in treatment such as use of intra-articular steroid/hyualuronic acid use, surgical referral or surgery were observed. Conclusions Patient populations differed significantly in terms of varus and valgus deformities at the knee.

Objective.There is controversy whether older-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is associated with a different, more benign disease course than in younger-onset SLE. Our objective was to characterize the clinical features and prognosis of late-onset SLE in a large, multicenter cohort.Methods.We studied adult-onset lupus in the 1000 Canadian Faces of Lupus cohort (n = 1528) of whom 10.5% had onset at age ≥ 50 years versus a control group with onset at < 50 years.Results.Disease duration was different in early- and late-onset groups (15 yrs in early vs 9.3 yrs in late; p < 0.001). Caucasians were represented more in the later-onset SLE group (55.6% vs 74.5%), while Asians and Blacks were more prevalent in the younger group. Younger-onset SLE subjects fulfilled more American College of Rheumatology criteria for SLE (< 50 yrs: 5.98 ± 1.68; ≥ 50 yrs: 5.24 ± 1.44; p < 0.0001). Despite an equal prevalence of anti-dsDNA, the younger-onset group more often had positive anti-Smith autoantibody, ribonucleoprotein, and hypocomplementemia, and more nephritis, rash, and cytopenias than the older-onset group. However, disease activity and damage accrual were higher in the older-onset group. The older patients received less prednisone and immunosuppressives (current and ever-use). As expected, comorbidity was higher in the older-onset SLE group.Conclusion.This study suggests that older age-onset SLE is not benign. There may be an interaction between lupus and age in which, although there is less lupus nephritis in the elderly, more disease activity and damage are present.

OBJECTIVE Data from a small study testing imatinib to treat SSc were used to determine if cytokine changes were related to differences in clinical parameters to model future early phase trials pairing cytokine changes and clinical parameters. METHODS Plasma and punch skin biopsy specimens collected at baseline and 6 months were analysed for levels of 26 fibrotic and inflammatory cytokines using multiplexed immunoassays and ELISA. Seven of nine patients on active treatment had paired data. Biopsies were biopulverized and standardized to protein levels in the tissue homogenate. Plasma was frozen at -80°C and analysed using multiplexed immunoassays or ELISAs standardized to CRP. Correlations between fold changes in cytokines and differences in clinical parameters (skin score, physician and patient global assessments and HAQ) were performed. P < 0.01 was considered significant. RESULTS After 6 months of imatinib treatment, plasma levels of soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 decreased significantly (P < 0.001), while tissue levels of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 increased (P < 0.01). Some significant correlations between fold changes in certain plasma fibrotic and inflammatory cytokines and changes in clinical parameters after 6 months of treatment were found: patient global scores and IL-13 (r = 0.964, P < 0.0001); ESR and IL-12p70 (r = -0.903, P < 0.01); in tissue samples, patient global score and soluble E-selectin (r = 0.913, P < 0.01); and physician global score with sCD40L (r = -0.883, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION Some serum and tissue cytokines may have a role in early phase clinical trials of SSc, correlating with changes in clinical parameters. Serum and tissue samples could be analysed in early phase trials to determine whether they support the clinical observations. TRIAL REGISTRATION http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01545427.

Objective. To characterize steroid use and compliance with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) guidelines within a large early inflammatory arthritis cohort. Methods. Using the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) database, patients with inflammatory arthritis on glucocorticoids (oral, IA and i.m.) were identified. Consecutive steroid exposure was defined as using glucocorticoids for two consecutive clinic visits (at least 90 days apart). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving calcium, vitamin D and a bisphosphonate among patients treated with consecutive oral glucocorticoids. Results. Six hundred and fifty-five patients were in the CATCH database, where 273 patients were identified as glucocorticoid users, of whom 48% were on oral prednisone, 38% received i.m. or IA and 13% both. The median oral daily dose of prednisone was 5 mg (interquartile range 2.510). Consecutive users (CUs, n = 78) compared with non-consecutive users (NUs, n = 532) showed that CUs were older (56 vs 50 years, P = 0.001); females were fewer (63% vs 74%, P = 0.04), but a similar proportion were RF positive (51% in CU vs 56% in NU, P = 0.73). For the primary outcome, rates of prophylaxis for users of consecutive oral steroids were as follows: 53% were treated with calcium, 47% with vitamin D and 25% were on a bisphosphonate. For users of oral prednisone at doses 57.5 mg/day, rates of prophylaxis were as follows: 64% were treated with calcium, 57% with vitamin D and 21% were on a bisphosphonate. Conclusion. Glucocorticoid therapy is frequently used in early inflammatory arthritis. The use of calcium, vitamin D or a bisphosphonate was low among chronic glucocorticoid users and illustrates the need for more diligence in patients receiving glucocorticoids to prevent GIOP.

We determined the prevalence of work disability in early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) and undifferentiated early inflammatory arthritis (EIA) patients at first enrollment into the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) who met the 2010 ACR criteria versus those not meeting criteria, to determine the impact of meeting new criteria on work disability status. Data at first visit into the cohort were analyzed. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the association of other variables in our database with work disability. 1,487 patients were enrolled in the CATCH study, a multi-site observational, prospective cohort of patients with EIA. 934 patients were excluded (505 based on missing criteria for ACR 2010 classification, as anti-CCP was absent, and 429 were not working for other reasons). Of the 553 patients included, 71 % were female with mean disease duration of 6.4 months. 524 (94.8 %) were employed while 29 (5.2 %) reported work disability at first visit. There were no differences between those meeting 2010 ACR criteria versus those who did not. Baseline characteristics associated with work disability were male gender, age, education, income, HAQ, and positive RF status. The mean HAQ score in work disabled patients was 1.4 versus 0.9 in those who were working (p0.001). Disease activity score (DAS28) was not associated with work disability (p = 0.069), nor was tender joint count, swollen joint count, anti-CCP, patient global assessment, or SF-12v2. In the regression model, work disability was associated with lower income levels (p = 0.01) and worse HAQ scores (OR 2.33; p = 0.001), but not significantly associated with male gender (p = 0.08), older age (50 years; p = 0.3), lower education (p = 0.3) or RF positivity (p = 0.6). We found rates of work disability to be low at entry into this EIA cohort compared to previous studies. There may be potential for intervention in ERA to prevent the development of work disability.

Summary Background To examine the effect of probiotics as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A sample size of 30 subjects was calculated to determine a moderate effect. Material/Methods A three month double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed using probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 capsules administered orally. Inclusion criteria required at least 4 swollen and 4 tender joints and stable medications with no steroids for at least 1 month prior to and during the study. Twenty-nine patients with RA were randomized to treatment. ACR20 responses, serum cytokine levels and safety parameters were assessed. Results Fifteen patients were randomized to the probiotic group, and 14 to placebo. Three subjects in the probiotic (20%) and one in the placebo group (7%) achieved an ACR20 response (p= 0.33). There was no statistically significant difference between individual components of the ACR20 criteria. Changes in cytokines favored placebo over probiotic. There was a significant improvement in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score in the probiotic group from visit 1 to visit 3 (p=0.02) but no between-group differences. Conclusions Due to inclusion criteria, patients selected for the study had stable RA with chronic synovitis, and thus it may have been difficult for an adjunctive therapy to demonstrate improvement within 3 months. Although probiotics did not clinically improve RA as measured by the ACR20, it is interesting that there was functional improvement seen within the probiotic group compared to placebo.