Search

Introduction: Early preventive strict quarantine due to COVID-19 pandemic was implemented in Argentina since March 20th, 2020. Transplant societies and organ procurement organizations were challenged to face this complex scenario and sustain organ donation and transplantation activity. Objectives: We evaluated the impact of complete and preventive lockdown in organ procurement and transplantation before the COVID-19 peak onset. Materials and Methods: We analyzed prospectively collected data from the National Report Agency (INCUCAI). By constructing time series, we compared donation and transplant rates from the years 2010 to 2020, during a same monthly-period between March 3rd and July 20th. We evaluated the effect of preventive lockdown before the peak of COVID-19 curve. Donation rates per million population in these months were also registered for each year. Transplant accessibility was calculated, dividing the total number of transplants and the total number of listed patients. Results: The preventive lockdown was associated with a 34.5% relative reduction (95% CI 26.9-43.2) in organ procurement when compared to 2010-2019 and significantly reduced comparing 2019 [53.3% (CI 44.6-61.6)]. This scenario was even worse in Buenos Aires city and its surroundings, the region most affected by COVID-19. During this period, donation per million population rates decreased from 7.8 in 2019 to 3.3 in 2020. This reduction was even higher in the number of deceased and living donor transplants performed comparing 2019 vs. 2020, with a relative reduction of 62.0% (CI 30.8-89.1) and 68.8% (CI 65.7-71.7), respectively. Conclusions: During this short observation period of 120 days of preventive quarantine, not yet having reached the ''peak'' incidence of COVID-19, a marked reduction in procurement and transplantation rates were observed. Although waiting list mortality was not significantly modified, transplant access has been significantly reduced, showing a future negative trend on waitlist mortality.

Introduction and Objectives: there is insufficient data regarding bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis to support recommendations for empiric antibiotic treatments, particularly in Latin America. This study aimed to evaluate bacterial infection's clinical impact and microbiological characteristics, intending to serve as a platform to revise current practices. Materials and Methods: multicenter prospective cohort study of patients with cirrhosis and bacterial infections from Argentina and Uruguay. Patient and infection-related information were collected, focusing on microbiology, antibiotic susceptibility patterns, and outcomes. Results: 472 patients were included. Spontaneous bacterial infections and urinary tract infections (UTIs) were registered in 187 (39.6%) and 116 (24.6%) patients, respectively, representing the most common infections. Of the 256 culture-positive infections, 103 (40.2%) were caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (reaching 50% for UTI), and 181 (70.7%) received adequate initial antibiotic treatment. The coverage of cefepime and ceftriaxone was over 70% for the empirical treatment of community-acquired spontaneous infections, but ceftazidime´s coverage was only 40%. For all UTI cases and for healthcare-associated or nosocomial spontaneous bacterial infections, the lower-spectrum antibiotics that covered at least 70% of the isolations were imipenem and meropenem. During hospitalization, a second bacterial infection was diagnosed in 9.8% of patients, 23.9% required at least one organ support, and 19.5% died. Conclusions: short-term mortality of bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis is very high, and a high percentage were caused by multidrug-resistant organisms, particularly in UTIs. The information provided might serve to adapt recommendations, particularly related to empirical antibiotic treatment in Argentina and Uruguay. The study was registered in Clinical Trials (NCT03919032).

Introduction and Objectives: Selecting an empiric antibiotic treatment in patients with cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial infections is challenging. It is of paramount importance to have local epidemiological data to maximize pathogen coverage while minimizing the unnecessary use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. This study aimed to describe the patterns of antibiotic resistance of spontaneous bacterial infections according to the site of acquisition. Materials and Methods: Analysis of the multicenter prospective cohort study of cirrhotic patients with bacterial infections in Argentina and Uruguay (NCT03919032). Only culture-positive spontaneous infections were included in this study: spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), spontaneous bacterial empyema (SBE), and spontaneous bacteremia (SB). We estimated the proportion of infections that were sensitive to various antibiotics according to where the infection was acquired: community-acquired (CA), healthcare-associated (HCA), or nosocomial (NOS). Approximately 80% coverage is advisable for empiric treatments in stable patients and 90% for critically-ill patients. Results: The main cohort included 472 patients, of whom 97 presented culture-positive spontaneous infections and were included: with 57 (59%) SBP, 34 (35%) SB, and 4 (6%) SBE. Regarding the site of acquisition, 43% were CA, 36% NOS, and 21% HCA. Gram-positive and negative bacteria were found in 53% and 47% of the infections. The most frequent isolations were Streptococcus spp (26%), E coli (20), K pneumonia (15%), S Aureus (10%), E. faecium (6%) and E. faecalis (4%). Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) were isolated in 35% of the patients. As shown in the table, cefepime and ceftriaxone offer the most rational coverage for CA and HCA infections, and imipenem or meropenem for NOS infections. However, in critically-ill patients, broader-spectrum antibiotics are needed to achieve a coverage closer to 90% (table). Conclusions: We present, for the first time in our region, evidence-based recommendations for the empirical treatment of spontaneous bacterial infections. Prior colonization and/or infections by MDROs might refine even more the antibiotic selection and should be explored.

Introduction and Objectives: there is insufficient data regarding bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis to support recommendations for empiric antibiotic treatments, particularly in Latin America. This study aimed to evaluate bacterial infection’s clinical impact and microbiological characteristics, intending to serve as a platform to revise current practices. Materials and Methods: multicenter prospective cohort study of patients with cirrhosis and bacterial infections from Argentina and Uruguay. Patient and infection-related information were collected, focusing on microbiology, antibiotic susceptibility patterns, and outcomes. Results: 472 patients were included. Spontaneous bacterial infections and urinary tract infections (UTIs) were registered in 187 (39.6%) and 116 (24.6%) patients, respectively, representing the most common infections. Of the 256 culture-positive infections, 103 (40.2%) were caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (reaching 50% for UTI), and 181 (70.7%) received adequate initial antibiotic treatment. The coverage of cefepime and ceftriaxone was over 70% for the empirical treatment of community-acquired spontaneous infections, but ceftazidimés coverage was only 40%. For all UTI cases and for healthcare-associated or nosocomial spontaneous bacterial infections, the lower-spectrum antibiotics that covered at least 70% of the isolations were imipenem and meropenem. During hospitalization, a second bacterial infection was diagnosed in 9.8% of patients, 23.9% required at least one organ support, and 19.5% died. Conclusions: short-term mortality of bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis is very high, and a high percentage were caused by multidrug-resistant organisms, particularly in UTIs. The information provided might serve to adapt recommendations, particularly related to empirical antibiotic treatment in Argentina and Uruguay. The study was registered in Clinical Trials (NCT03919032). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]