Search

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy is a standard procedure, but it might be burdened with serious adverse events, mainly hemorrhagic. Literature lacks recent studies taking into account new ultrasound machines, more sensitive to tiny vessels and the evolution of the bioptic technique, including ultrasound guidance in all instances. Hence, the primary aim of this study was to evaluate complication rates of ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy in a recent population. Secondary aims were to evaluate if the experience of operator is a determinant of risk of complication and to identify other potential risk factors. METHODS: We evaluated 800 procedures carried out in one hospital in the period 2010-2018. RESULTS: Complication rate resulted in 4%, with the occurrence of moderate hemorrhagic complications in 0.75%. No cases of severe events or death were registered. A higher risk of bleeding was found to be associated with less experienced operators, while the need to perform multiple needle insertions increased the probability of adverse events. CONCLUSION: The present findings confirmed ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy to be a substantially safe procedure with a low risk of overall adverse events and bleeding in particular, especially when performed by expert operators.

Background: Due to its poor survival, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is held to be a much more aggressive cancer than hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In most published series, patients were diagnosed when symptomatic. However, ICC is now increasingly being discovered during the surveillance for HCC in cirrhosis. Whether this earlier detection of ICC is associated with an equally dismal prognosis or not is unknown. Methods: This is amulticenter retrospective study of consecutive ICC patients. Patients were stratified into subgroups according to the absence/presence of cirrhosis. A propensity score matching was performed to reduce the potential biases. Cirrhotic patients were further stratified according to their surveillance status. The lead-time bias and its potential effects were also estimated. Results: We gathered 184 patients. Eighty-five patients (46.2%) were cirrhotic. Liver cirrhosis was not related to a worse overall survival (33.0 vs. 32.0 months, p = 0.800) even after the propensity score analysis (43.0 in vs. 44.0 months in 54 pairs of patients, p = 0.878). Among the cirrhotic population, 47 (55.3%) patients had received a diagnosis of ICC during a surveillance programme. The 2 subgroups differed in maximum tumour dimensions (30 vs. 48 mm in surveyed and non-surveyed patients, respectively). Surveyed patients were more likely to receive surgical treatments (59.8 vs. 28.9%, p = 0.003). Overall survival was higher in surveyed patients (51.0 vs. 21.0 months, p < 0.001). These benefits were confirmed after correcting for the lead-time bias. Conclusions: Cirrhotic patients have different clinical presentation and outcomes of ICC according to their surveillance status. In our series, ICC in cirrhosis was not associated with worse OS. Cirrhosis itself should not discourage either surgical or non-surgical treatments.

Background: Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma can be achieved by imaging in cirrhotic patients. Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma is a primary liver tumor and its imaging patterns have been poorly investigated. Misdiagnosis for either hepatocellular carcinoma or benign lesions can occur. We aimed to evaluate the enhancement pattern of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma in cirrhosis with imaging techniques and to estimate the risk of misdiagnosis for hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: All histology-confirmed combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma in cirrhosis seen in two Italian centers between 2003 and 2016, in which at least one imaging technique had been performed, was retrospectively collected. The enhancement pattern was analyzed for all available imaging modalities. Results: A total of 37 combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma nodules were identified. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging had been performed in 27, 34, and 17 nodules, respectively. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound was at higher risk of misdiagnosis for pure hepatocellular carcinoma than computed tomography (p = 0.005) or magnetic resonance imaging (p = 0.040). Only six of 24 combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma lesions submitted to both contrast-enhanced ultrasound and computed tomography showed coincident patterns; contrast-enhanced ultrasound correctly suggested a condition of malignancy in a higher number of cases than computed tomography (p < 0.001) and magnetic resonance imaging (p = 0.002). Conclusions: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound misdiagnosed a higher number of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma as hepatocellular carcinoma than computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. However, the latter techniques were able to identify features of malignancy less often.

Gangrenous cholecystitis and perforation are severe complications of acute cholecystitis, which have a challenging preoperative diagnosis. Early identification allows better surgical management. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (ceCT) is the current diagnostic gold standard. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is a promising tool for the diagnosis of gallbladder perforation, but data from the literature concerning efficacy are sparse. The aim of the study was to evaluate CEUS findings in pathologically proven complicated cholecystitis (gangrenous, perforated gallbladder, pericholecystic abscess). A total of 8 patients submitted to preoperative CEUS, and with subsequent proven acute complicated cholecystitis at surgical inspection and pathological analysis, were retrospectively identified. The final diagnosis was gangrenous/phlegmonous cholecystitis (n. 2), phlegmonous/ulcerative changes plus pericholecystic abscess (n. 2), perforated plus pericholecystic abscess (n. 3), or perforated plus pericholecystic biliary collection (n. 1). Conventional US findings revealed irregularly thickened gallbladder walls in all 8 patients, with vaguely defined walls in 7 patients, four of whom also had striated wall thickening. CEUS revealed irregular enhancing gallbladder walls in all patients. A distinct wall defect was seen in six patients, confirmed as gangrenous/phlegmonous cholecystitis at pathology in all six, and in four as perforation at macroscopic surgical inspection. CEUS is a non-invasive easily repeatable technique that can be performed at the bedside, and is able to accurately diagnose complicated/perforated cholecystitis. Despite the limited sample size in the present case series, CEUS appears as a promising tool for the management of patients with the clinical possibility of having an acute complicated cholecystitis.

Imaging techniques have become the accepted mainstay for the assessment of liver lesions in cirrhosis and, thanks to the improvement of their diagnostic capabilities in recent years, have further limited the need to resort to bioptic sampling. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common cause of de-novo liver nodules in cirrhosis, and its diagnosis relies on noninvasive contrast-enhanced imaging studies. Diagnostic criteria have been extensively validated, and the vascular pattern deemed typical for HCC is an arterial hyperenhancement of the nodule followed by washout in the portal or late phase. This pattern provides a positive predictive value for the diagnosis of HCC of about 97% in nodules in cirrhosis according to the literature. However, the need for a more precise differentiation from other malignancies arising in cirrhosis, making up the remaining about 3%, and specifically intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, has over time led to changes in the recommendations for the noninvasive diagnosis of HCC in cirrhosis. The present review aims to report recently published interesting studies that have brought new insights into the problem of the characterization and differential diagnosis of liver tumors in chronic liver diseases.