Search

Aims: Echocardiographic strain imaging reflects myocardial deformation and is a sensitive measure of cardiac function and wall-motion abnormalities. Deep learning (DL) algorithms could automate the interpretation of echocardiographic strain imaging., Methods and Results: We developed and trained an automated DL-based algorithm for left ventricular (LV) strain measurements in an internal dataset. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was validated externally in (i) a real-world Taiwanese cohort of participants with and without heart failure (HF), (ii) a core-lab measured dataset from the multinational prevalence of microvascular dysfunction-HF and preserved ejection fraction (PROMIS-HFpEF) study, and regional strain in (iii) the HMC-QU-MI study of patients with suspected myocardial infarction. Outcomes included measures of agreement [bias, mean absolute difference (MAD), root-mean-squared-error (RMSE), and Pearson's correlation (R)] and area under the curve (AUC) to identify HF and regional wall-motion abnormalities. The DL workflow successfully analysed 3741 (89%) studies in the Taiwanese cohort, 176 (96%) in PROMIS-HFpEF, and 158 (98%) in HMC-QU-MI. Automated GLS showed good agreement with manual measurements (mean ± SD): -18.9 ± 4.5% vs. -18.2 ± 4.4%, respectively, bias 0.68 ± 2.52%, MAD 2.0 ± 1.67, RMSE = 2.61, R = 0.84 in the Taiwanese cohort; and -15.4 ± 4.1% vs. -15.9 ± 3.6%, respectively, bias -0.65 ± 2.71%, MAD 2.19 ± 1.71, RMSE = 2.78, R = 0.76 in PROMIS-HFpEF. In the Taiwanese cohort, automated GLS accurately identified patients with HF (AUC = 0.89 for total HF and AUC = 0.98 for HF with reduced ejection fraction). In HMC-QU-MI, automated regional strain identified regional wall-motion abnormalities with an average AUC = 0.80., Conclusion: DL algorithms can interpret echocardiographic strain images with similar accuracy as conventional measurements. These results highlight the potential of DL algorithms to democratize the use of cardiac strain measurements and reduce time-spent and costs for echo labs globally., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: P.L.M. has received research grants from AstraZenca and consulting fees from Amarin, AmGen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Orion Pharma, Pharmacosmos, Vifor, and Us2.ai. A.S. received research grants from Academy of Finland and Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research during the conduct of the study; and consulting fees from GE healthcare, Novartis, Abbot, Astra Zeneca. C.H. has received consulting fees from Novartis and MSD. M.J.F., Z.J., Y.M.H. are all employees of Us2.ai. M.L.F. is employee of AstraZeneca R&D. L.H.L. reports no disclosures related to this work. Outside the present work: Grants from AstraZeneca, Vifor, Boston Scientific, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, MSD. Consulting for Vifor, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Pharmacosmos, MSD, MedScape, Sanofi, Lexicon, Myokardia, Boehringer Ingelheim, Servier, Edwards Life Sciences, Alleviant. Speaker’s honoraria from Abbott, OrionPharma, MedScape, Radcliffe, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer. Patent and stock ownership for AnaCardio. S.J.S. has received research grants from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Corvia, and Novartis; and consulting fees from Actelion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cardiora, Eisai, Ironwood, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Tenax, and United Therapeutics. C.S.L. has received research support from Novo Nordisk and Roche Diagnostics; and has consulted for Alleviant Medical, Allysta Pharma, Amgen, AnaCardio AB, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biopeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, CardioRenal, Cytokinetics, Darma Inc., EchoNous Inc, Eli Lilly, Impulse Dynamics, Intellia Therapeutics, Ionis Pharmaceutical, Janssen Research & Development LLC, Medscape/WebMD Global LLC, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Prosciento Inc, Quidel Corporation, Radcliffe Group Ltd., Recardio Inc, ReCor Medical, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, and Us2.ai. J.T. is supported by the National University of Singapore Start-up grant, the tier 1 grant from the ministry of education and the CS-IRG New Investigator Grant from the National Medical Research Council; has received research support from AstraZeneca, consulting or speaker fees from Daiichi-Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche diagnostics and Us2.ai, and owns patent US-10702247-B2 related to the present work. All other authors have no disclosures., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction in the normal range (HFnEF) (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] of ≥55% for men and ≥60% for women) is understudied., Objectives: The authors aimed to characterize patients with HFnEF compared with those with preserved (≥50%) yet below the normal LVEF., Methods: In an Asian HF registry, clinical characteristics, echocardiographic features, and outcomes were compared across: 1) HFnEF; 2) heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF) (LVEF of ≥50%) and below normal LVEF; and 3) community-based controls without HF. Cluster analysis of echocardiographic parameters was performed and validated in an external cohort., Results: Among 1,765 patients with HFpEF (age 68 ± 12 years; 50% women), 1,313 (74.4%) had HFnEF. Compared with patients with HFpEF and below normal LVEF, patients with HFnEF had less coronary artery disease (33.7% vs 27.9%), greater LV wall thickness, and higher stroke volume, but similar 2-year age-adjusted all-cause mortality (HR: 0.8; 95% CI: 0.6-1.2). Five echocardiographic clusters with similar 2-year mortality were identified: 1) normal LV (normal structure despite increased filling pressure; least comorbidities) in 25%; 2) restrictive (smallest stroke volume; predominantly elderly women) in 26%; 3) hypertrophic (most concentric hypertrophy; more men) in 25%; 4) high output (greatest stroke volume; predominantly obese younger men) in 10%; and 5) atrial dominant (most left atrial myopathy; mainly elderly women with multiple comorbidities) in 10%. Similar patterns were found in the validation cohort., Conclusions: The majority of patients with HFpEF had normal LVEF, which consists of patients with different patterns of cardiac features and clinical characteristics. Results may carry implications for targeted treatment approaches in HFpEF., Competing Interests: The ASIAN-HF is supported by research grants from Boston Scientific Investigator Sponsored Research Program, National Medical Research Council of Singapore (R-172-003-219-511), The ATTRaCT program (SPF2014/003, SPF2014/004, SPF2014/005), and Bayer. The PROMIS-HFpEF study was sponsored by AstraZeneca. Dr Tromp is supported by the National University of Singapore Start-up grant, the tier 1 grant from the ministry of education and the CS-IRG New Investigator Grant from the National Medical Research Council; has received consulting or speaker fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche diagnostics and Us2.ai, owns patent US-10702247-B2 unrelated to the present work. Dr Chandramouli has received grants from National Medical Research Council Singapore; philanthropic research grants from Lee Foundation Singapore; and consulting or speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Us2.ai, and Sanofi. Dr Anand has received consulting fees from Amgen, ARCA Pharma, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, LivaNova, and Novartis. Dr Lund is supported by Karolinska Institutet, the Swedish Research Council [grant 523-2014-2336], the Swedish Heart Lung Foundation [grants 20150557, 20190310], and the Stockholm County Council [grants 20170112, 20190525]; reports consultancy with AstraZeneca, Novartis, Bayer, Vifor Pharma, Sanofi, Lexicon, Myokardia, Pharmacosmos, Merck/MSD, Respicardia, Medscape; lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Vifor Pharma, Bayer, Orion Pharma, Abbott, Medscape, Radcliffe Cardiology, research grants from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Vifor Pharma, Pharmacosmos, and stock ownership in AnaCardio. Dr Richards has received research support from Boston Scientific, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Medtronic, Roche Diagnostics, Abbott Laboratories, Thermo Fisher, and Critical Diagnostics; and has consulted for Bayer, Novartis, Merck, AstraZeneca, and Roche Diagnostics. Dr Shah has received grants from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (U54 HL160273, R01 HL107577, R01 HL127028, R01 HL140731, R01 HL149423), Actelion, AstraZeneca, Corvia, Novartis, and Pfizer; and consulting fees from Abbott, Actelion, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Aria CV, Axon Therapies, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardiora, Coridea, CVRx, Cyclerion, Cytokinetics, Edwards Lifesciences, Eidos, Eisai, Imara, Impulse Dynamics, Intellia, Ionis, Ironwood, Lilly, Merck, MyoKardia, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Prothena, Regeneron, Rivus, Sanofi, Shifamed, Tenax, Tenaya, and United Therapeutics. Dr Lam is supported by a Clinician Scientist Award from the National Medical Research Council of Singapore; has received research support from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, and Roche Diagnostics; has served as consultant or on the Advisory Board/Steering Committee/ Executive Committee for Actelion, Amgen, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Cytokinetics, Darma Inc., Us2.ai, Janssen Research & Development LLC, Medscape, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Radcliffe Group Ltd., Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, and WebMD Global LLC; and serves as co-founder & non-executive director of Us2.ai. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Aim: Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) may play a role in the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We investigated associations of EAT with proteomics, coronary flow reserve (CFR), cardiac structure and function, and quality of life (QoL) in the prospective multinational PROMIS-HFpEF cohort., Methods and Results: Epicardial adipose tissue was measured by echocardiography in 182 patients and defined as increased if ≥9 mm. Proteins were measured using high-throughput proximity extension assays. Microvascular dysfunction was evaluated with Doppler-based CFR, cardiac structural and functional indices with echocardiography and QoL by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Patients with increased EAT (n = 54; 30%) had higher body mass index (32 [28-40] vs. 27 [23-30] kg/m 2 ; p < 0.001), lower N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (466 [193-1133] vs. 1120 [494-1990] pg/ml; p < 0.001), smaller indexed left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic and left atrial (LA) volumes and tendency to lower KCCQ score. Non-indexed LV/LA volumes did not differ between groups. When adjusted for body mass index, EAT remained associated with LV septal wall thickness (coefficient 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.04; p = 0.018) and mitral E wave deceleration time (coefficient 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05; p = 0.005). Increased EAT was associated with proteomic markers of adipose biology and inflammation, insulin resistance, endothelial dysfunction, and dyslipidaemia but not significantly with CFR., Conclusion: Increased EAT was associated with cardiac structural alterations and proteins expressing adiposity, inflammation, lower insulin sensitivity and endothelial dysfunction related to HFpEF pathology, probably driven by general obesity. Potential local mechanical or paracrine effects mediated by EAT remain to be elucidated., (© 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Impaired left atrial (LA) function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with adverse outcomes. A subgroup of HFpEF may have LA myopathy out of proportion to left ventricular (LV) dysfunction; therefore, we sought to characterize HFpEF patients with disproportionate LA myopathy. In the prospective, multicenter, Prevalence of Microvascular Dysfunction in HFpEF study, we defined disproportionate LA myopathy based on degree of LA reservoir strain abnormality in relation to LV myopathy (LV global longitudinal strain [GLS]) by calculating the residuals from a linear regression of LA reservoir strain and LV GLS. We evaluated associations of disproportionate LA myopathy with hemodynamics and performed a plasma proteomic analysis to identify proteins associated with disproportionate LA myopathy; proteins were validated in an independent sample. Disproportionate LA myopathy correlated with better LV diastolic function but was associated with lower stroke volume reserve after passive leg raise independent of atrial fibrillation (AF). Additionally, disproportionate LA myopathy was associated with higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure, higher pulmonary vascular resistance, and lower coronary flow reserve. Of 248 proteins, we identified and validated 5 proteins (involved in cardiomyocyte stretch, extracellular matrix remodeling, and inflammation) that were associated with disproportionate LA myopathy independent of AF. In HFpEF, LA myopathy may exist out of proportion to LV myopathy. Disproportionate LA myopathy is a distinct HFpEF subtype associated with worse hemodynamics and a distinct proteomic signature, independent of AF.

Background: A systemic proinflammatory state has been hypothesized to mediate the association between comorbidities and abnormal cardiac structure/function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We conducted a proteomic analysis to investigate this paradigm., Methods: In 228 patients with HFpEF from the multicenter PROMIS-HFpEF study (Prevalence of Microvascular Dysfunction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction), 248 unique circulating proteins were quantified by a multiplex immunoassay (Olink) and used to recapitulate systemic inflammation. In a deductive approach, we performed principal component analysis to summarize 47 proteins known a priori to be involved in inflammation. In an inductive approach, we performed unbiased weighted coexpression network analyses of all 248 proteins to identify clusters of proteins that overrepresented inflammatory pathways. We defined comorbidity burden as the sum of 8 common HFpEF comorbidities. We used multivariable linear regression and statistical mediation analyses to determine whether and to what extent inflammation mediates the association of comorbidity burden with abnormal cardiac structure/function in HFpEF. We also externally validated our findings in an independent cohort of 117 HFpEF cases and 30 comorbidity controls without heart failure., Results: Comorbidity burden was associated with abnormal cardiac structure/function and with principal components/clusters of inflammation proteins. Systemic inflammation was also associated with increased mitral E velocity, E/e' ratio, and tricuspid regurgitation velocity; and worse right ventricular function (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and right ventricular free wall strain). Inflammation mediated the association between comorbidity burden and mitral E velocity (proportion mediated 19%-35%), E/e' ratio (18%-29%), tricuspid regurgitation velocity (27%-41%), and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (13%) ( P <0.05 for all), but not right ventricular free wall strain. TNFR1 (tumor necrosis factor receptor 1), UPAR (urokinase plasminogen activator receptor), IGFBP7 (insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7), and GDF-15 (growth differentiation factor-15) were the top individual proteins that mediated the relationship between comorbidity burden and echocardiographic parameters. In the validation cohort, inflammation was upregulated in HFpEF cases versus controls, and the most prominent inflammation protein cluster identified in PROMIS-HFpEF was also present in HFpEF cases (but not controls) in the validation cohort., Conclusions: Proteins involved in inflammation form a conserved network in HFpEF across 2 independent cohorts and may mediate the association between comorbidity burden and echocardiographic indicators of worse hemodynamics and right ventricular dysfunction. These findings support the comorbidity-inflammation paradigm in HFpEF.

Background: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is common in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We assessed the association of CMD with hospitalization and mortality in HFpEF., Methods and Results: We assessed the 1-year outcomes in patients from the PROMIS-HFpEF study, a prospective observational study of patients with chronic stable HFpEF undergoing coronary flow reserve measurements. Outcomes were (1) time to cardiovascular (CV) death/first HF hospitalization, (2) CV death/recurrent HF hospitalizations, (3) all-cause death/first HF hospitalization, and (4) first and (5) recurrent all-cause hospitalizations. CMD was defined as coronary flow reserve of <2.5. Time to CV death/first hospitalization was compared by log-rank test and recurrent HF and all-cause hospitalizations by Poisson test. Of 263 patients enrolled, 257 were evaluable at 1 year. Where the coronary flow reserve was interpretable (n = 201), CMD was present in 150 (75%). The median follow-up was 388 days (Q1, Q3 365, 418). The outcome of CV death/first HF hospitalization occurred in 15 patients (4 CV deaths). The incidence rate was in CMD 96 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 54-159, vs non-CMD 0 per1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 0-68, P = .023, and remained significant after accounting for selected clinical variables. In patients with CMD, the incidence rates were significantly higher also for CV death/recurrent HF hospitalizations, all-cause death/first HF, and recurrent but not first all-cause hospitalization., Conclusions: In this exploratory assessment of the prognostic role of CMD in HFpEF, CMD was independently associated with primarily CV- and HF-specific events. The high prevalence of CMD and its CV and HF specific prognostic role suggest CMD may be a potential treatment target in HFpEF., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: To date, clinical evidence of microvascular dysfunction in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has been limited. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and its association with systemic endothelial dysfunction, HF severity, and myocardial dysfunction in a well defined, multi-centre HFpEF population., Methods and Results: This prospective multinational multi-centre observational study enrolled patients fulfilling strict criteria for HFpEF according to current guidelines. Those with known unrevascularized macrovascular coronary artery disease (CAD) were excluded. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) was measured with adenosine stress transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. Systemic endothelial function [reactive hyperaemia index (RHI)] was measured by peripheral arterial tonometry. Among 202 patients with HFpEF, 151 [75% (95% confidence interval 69-81%)] had CMD (defined as CFR <2.5). Patients with CMD had a higher prevalence of current or prior smoking (70% vs. 43%; P = 0.0006) and atrial fibrillation (58% vs. 25%; P = 0.004) compared with those without CMD. Worse CFR was associated with higher urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and NTproBNP, and lower RHI, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, and right ventricular (RV) free wall strain after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, revascularized CAD, smoking, left ventricular mass, and study site (P < 0.05 for all associations)., Conclusions: PROMIS-HFpEF is the first prospective multi-centre, multinational study to demonstrate a high prevalence of CMD in HFpEF in the absence of unrevascularized macrovascular CAD, and to show its association with systemic endothelial dysfunction (RHI, UACR) as well as markers of HF severity (NTproBNP and RV dysfunction). Microvascular dysfunction may be a promising therapeutic target in HFpEF.