Search

Abstract Background Hyperprolactinemia is a common endocrine disorder that can be associated with significant morbidity. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses of outcomes of hyperprolactinemic patients, including microadenomas and macroadenomas, to provide evidence-based recommendations for practitioners. Through this review, we aimed to compare efficacy and adverse effects of medications, surgery and radiotherapy in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia. Methods We searched electronic databases, reviewed bibliographies of included articles, and contacted experts in the field. Eligible studies provided longitudinal follow-up of patients with hyperprolactinemia and evaluated outcomes of interest. We collected descriptive, quality and outcome data (tumor growth, visual field defects, infertility, sexual dysfunction, amenorrhea/oligomenorrhea and prolactin levels). Results After review, 8 randomized and 178 nonrandomized studies (over 3,000 patients) met inclusion criteria. Compared to no treatment, dopamine agonists significantly reduced prolactin level (weighted mean difference, -45; 95% confidence interval, -77 to −11) and the likelihood of persistent hyperprolactinemia (relative risk, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 0.99). Cabergoline was more effective than bromocriptine in reducing persistent hyperprolactinemia, amenorrhea/oligomenorrhea, and galactorrhea. A large body of noncomparative literature showed dopamine agonists improved other patient-important outcomes. Low-to-moderate quality evidence supports improved outcomes with surgery and radiotherapy compared to no treatment in patients who were resistant to or intolerant of dopamine agonists. Conclusion Our results provide evidence to support the use of dopamine agonists in reducing prolactin levels and persistent hyperprolactinemia, with cabergoline proving more efficacious than bromocriptine. Radiotherapy and surgery are useful in patients with resistance or intolerance to dopamine agonists.

Objective: To investigate the effect of intravenous insulin therapy combined with nicotinamide in the metabolic control and beta-cell function of newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic subjects in comparison with intensive insulin therapy and nicotinamide alone.Research Design and Methods: A total of 34 newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic patients were included. After the correction of initial metabolic disturbances, subjects were randomly assigned to the following three groups within 72 h after admission: 1) intensive insulin therapy + placebo (C) (n = 12); 2) intensive insulin therapy + nicotinamide, 700 mg three times a day (NIC) (n = 11); and 3) 72-h intravenous insulin followed by intensive insulin therapy + nicotinamide, 700 mg three times a day (NIV) (n = 11). The subjects were monitored for 12 months. GAD, tyrosine phosphatase antibodies, and insulin autoantibodies were measured. C-peptide was measured basally and after 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 min of 1 mg intravenous glucagon. HbA1c, glucagon, and antibody measurements were determined initially and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.Results: HbA1c values declined to normal after treatment was initiated in all groups and remained not significantly different during the follow-up period. We did not find differences between experimental (NIC and NIV) and placebo (C) groups in terms of beta-cell function, considering basal or glucagon-stimulated C-peptide (maximal stimulated C-peptide and area under the curve [AUC] of C-peptide) values during the follow-up period. After pooling data from the NIC and NIV groups (both including nicotinamide) and comparing it with data from the C group, the results remained unchanged. At diagnosis, GAD positivity was observed in 10 of 12, 8 of 11, and 10 of 11 subjects (NS) in the C, NIC, and NIV groups, respectively, and IA2 positivity was observed in 3 of 12, 4 of 11, and 4 of 11 subjects (NS) in the C, NIC, and NIV groups, respectively. Antibody titers displayed a similar behavior in all groups during the follow-up period.Conclusions: Our pilot study failed to demonstrate that the addition of 72-h intravenous insulin and nicotinamide to conventional intensive insulin therapy produces any beneficial effect in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic subjects in terms of beta-cell function and metabolic control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD), particularly ischemic heart disease, remains the leading cause of death and morbidity in patients with type 1 diabetes. Detecting subclinical atherosclerosis could enhance cardiovascular risk stratification and enable individualised therapies. The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence and predictors of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with type 1 diabetes without overt cardiovascular disease (CVD) and to assess its impact on patient survival over a follow-up period of at least 5 years., Methods: This observational study included 507 patients treated at the Diabetes Unit of the Hospital of Girona Doctor Josep Trueta between 2015 and 2023. The inclusion criteria for patients were as follows: those aged 18 and older with diabetes for a minimum of 10 years or those aged 40 and older with a diabetes for at least 5 years. Subclinical atherosclerosis was identified via ultrasound imaging of the carotid and femoral arteries. Clinical and biochemical evaluations were also conducted. Major cardiovascular events (MACE) and deaths from other causes were monitored, and survival analysis was performed using Kaplan‒Meier methods., Results: Subclinical atherosclerosis was detected in 218 patients (43%). Multivariate analysis revealed that the male sex, diabetic nephropathy, tobacco exposure, higher HbA1c levels, older age, and longer diabetes duration were significant predictors. During a mean follow-up of 70.64 ± 27.08 months, 19 patients experienced MACE, and 13 died from any cause. The probability of MACE or death was greater in patients with subclinical atherosclerosis, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 25.1 (95% CI 5.81-108, p < 0.001) for MACE and an odds ratio (OR) of 7.57 (95% CI 1.97-53.9, p = 0.004) for death., Conclusion: Subclinical atherosclerosis is independently associated with increased overall mortality and MACE in patients with type 1 diabetes. Identifying clinical predictors can improve risk stratification and personalised therapeutic strategies to prevent MACEs in this high-risk population., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Context: Sleep disruption is associated with worse glucose metabolic control and altered gut microbiota in animal models., Objective: We aimed to evaluate the possible links among rapid eye movement (REM) sleep duration, continuous glucose levels, and gut microbiota composition., Methods: This observational, prospective, real-life, cross-sectional case-control study included 118 (60 with obesity), middle-aged (39.1-54.8 years) healthy volunteers recruited at a tertiary hospital. Glucose variability and REM sleep duration were assessed by 10-day continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) (Dexcom G6) and wrist actigraphy (Fitbit Charge 3), respectively. The coefficient of variation (CV), interquartile range (IQR), and SD of glucose variability was assessed and the percentage of time in range (% TIR), at 126-139 mg/dL (TIR2), and 140-199 mg/dL (TIR3) were calculated. Shotgun metagenomics sequencing was applied to study gut microbiota taxonomy and functionality., Results: Increased glycemic variability (SD, CV, and IQR) was observed among subjects with obesity in parallel to increased % TIR2 and % TIR3. REM sleep duration was independently associated with % TIR3 (β = -.339; P < .001) and glucose variability (SD, β = -.350; P < .001). Microbial taxa from the Christensenellaceae family (Firmicutes phylum) were positively associated with REM sleep and negatively with CGM levels, while bacteria from Enterobacteriacea family and bacterial functions involved in iron metabolism showed opposite associations., Conclusion: Decreased REM sleep duration was independently associated with a worse glucose profile. The associations of species from Christensenellaceae and Enterobacteriaceae families with REM sleep duration and continuous glucose values suggest an integrated picture of metabolic health., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: The Patient Empowerment through Predictive Personalized Decision Support (PEPPER) system provides personalized bolus advice for people with type 1 diabetes. The system incorporates an adaptive insulin recommender system (based on case-based reasoning, an artificial intelligence methodology), coupled with a safety system, which includes predictive glucose alerts and alarms, predictive low-glucose suspend, personalized carbohydrate recommendations, and dynamic bolus insulin constraint. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the PEPPER system compared to a standard bolus calculator. Methods: This was an open-labeled multicenter randomized controlled crossover study. Following 4-week run-in, participants were randomized to PEPPER/Control or Control/PEPPER in a 1:1 ratio for 12 weeks. Participants then crossed over after a washout period. The primary end-point was percentage time in range (TIR, 3.9-10.0 mmol/L [70-180 mg/dL]). Secondary outcomes included glycemic variability, quality of life, and outcomes on the safety system and insulin recommender. Results: Fifty-four participants on multiple daily injections (MDI) or insulin pump completed the run-in period, making up the intention-to-treat analysis. Median (interquartile range) age was 41.5 (32.3-49.8) years, diabetes duration 21.0 (11.5-26.0) years, and HbA1c 61.0 (58.0-66.1) mmol/mol. No significant difference was observed for percentage TIR between the PEPPER and Control groups (62.5 [52.1-67.8] % vs. 58.4 [49.6-64.3] %, respectively, P  = 0.27). For quality of life, participants reported higher perceived hypoglycemia with the PEPPER system despite no objective difference in time spent in hypoglycemia. Conclusions: The PEPPER system was safe, but did not change glycemic outcomes, compared to control. There is wide scope for integrating PEPPER into routine diabetes management for pump and MDI users. Further studies are required to confirm overall effectiveness. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03849755.

Aim: In a world of data overload, clinical practice recommendations are needed to help practitioners and patients to take evidence-based decisions. However, in the field of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) recommendations on glycemic goals and treatment choice are controversial in spite of being supported by a common body of evidence. We hypothesize that internal and external validity of this body of evidence might not be as sound as expected. The aim of the current study is to appraise the studies supporting recommendations developed by influential medical societies dealing with glycemic goals and the choice of pharmacological treatment in adults with T2DM., Methods: Clinical practice recommendations and their references were extracted out of eight documents developed by influential scientific societies between 2016 and 2019. Internal and external validity of each study was then appraised with standard tools and in duplicate., Results: A total of 114 recommendations and their underlying 233 citations were extracted. Out of these 233 citations 81 (35%) corresponded to randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 45 (20%) to systematic reviews. After systematical appraisal only four RCT (5%) and eight systematic reviews (17%) were considered to be unflawed. Indirectness (lack of generalizability) was the most common caveat identified in RCTs. Out of the 114 recommendations analyzed (32 dealing with glycemic goals and 82 with treatment choice), only 21 (18.4%) were supported by at least one high-quality study., Conclusion: Only one in five recommendations regarding glycemic goals or pharmacological treatment choice in T2DM is based on at least one high-quality study. Clinical practice recommendations dealing with areas of uncertainty should be formulated more transparently to enable real evidence-based decisions.

Background: Delivering insulin in type 1 diabetes is a challenging, and potentially risky, activity; hence the importance of including safety measures as part of any insulin dosing or recommender system. This work presents and clinically evaluates a modular safety system that is part of an intelligent insulin dose recommender platform developed within the EU-funded PEPPER project., Methods: The proposed safety system is composed of four modules which use a novel glucose forecasting algorithm. These modules are predictive glucose alerts and alarms; a predictive low-glucose basal insulin suspension module; an advanced rescue carbohydrate recommender for resolving hypoglycemia; and a personalized safety constraint applied to insulin recommendations. The technical feasibility of the proposed safety system was evaluated in a pilot study including eight adult subjects with type 1 diabetes on multiple daily injections over a duration of six weeks. Glycemic control and safety system functioning were compared between the two-weeks run-in period and the end point at eight weeks. A standard insulin bolus calculator was employed to recommend insulin doses., Results: Overall, glycemic control improved over the evaluated period. In particular, percentage time in the hypoglycemia range (<3.0 mmol/l) significantly decreased from 0.82% (0.05-4.79) at run-in to 0.33% (0.00-0.93) at endpoint ( P = .02). This was associated with a significant increase in percentage time in target range (3.9-10.0 mmol/l) from 52.8% (38.3-61.5) to 61.3% (47.5-71.7) ( P = .03). There was also a reduction in number of carbohydrate recommendations., Conclusion: A safety system for an insulin dose recommender has been proven to be a viable solution to reduce the number of adverse events associated to glucose control in type 1 diabetes.

Background and Aims: The possible contribution of iron to cardiovascular complications of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been scarcely investigated. We aimed to study whether serum ferritin is linked to prevalent/incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) in T2D., Methods: The prevalence of coronary heart disease (CHD), cerebrovascular disease (CEVD) and CVD was evaluated in the SIDIAP study (n = 38,617) and prevalence and 7-year incidence were analysed in the Edinburgh Type 2 Diabetes Study (ET2DS) (n = 821). Logistic and Cox regressions were used to describe associations between serum ferritin and CVD adjusting for confounding variables., Results: Increase of 1 SD unit in log-ferritin was associated with lower CVD prevalence in fully-adjusted models (ET2DS odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81 (0.68-0.96), p = 0.018; SIDIAP study: 0.91 (0.88-0.94), p < 0.001). In ET2DS, ferritin in the highest (vs. the lowest) quintile was associated with lower incidence of CVD (fully adjusted HR 95% CI: 0.46 (0.26-0.83), p = 0.010). This association persisted after removing subjects with CVD at baseline (n = 536) (HR 95% CI: 0.34 (0.14-0.81), p = 0.016)., Conclusions: Low iron status was associated with CVD risk in T2D. This pattern was consistent in populations at different cardiovascular risk. Low iron status seems to be harmful for cardiovascular health in T2D and it may be a target for intervention., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Context: The risks of testosterone therapy in men remain poorly understood., Objective: The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analyses of testosterone trials to evaluate the adverse effects of testosterone treatment in men., Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL from 2003 through August 2008. Review of reference lists and contact with experts further identified candidate studies., Study Selection: Eligible studies were comparative, randomized, and nonrandomized and reported the effects of testosterone on outcomes of interest (death, cardiovascular events and risk factors, prostate outcomes, and erythrocytosis). Reviewers, working independently and in duplicate, determined study eligibility., Data Extraction: Reviewers working independently and in duplicate determined the methodological quality of studies and collected descriptive, quality, and outcome data., Data Synthesis: The methodological quality of the 51 included studies varied from low to medium, and follow-up duration ranged from 3 months to 3 yr. Testosterone treatment was associated with a significant increase in hemoglobin [weighted mean difference (WMD), 0.80 g/dl; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45 to 1.14] and hematocrit (WMD, 3.18%; 95% CI, 1.35 to 5.01), and a decrease in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (WMD, -0.49 mg/dl; 95% CI, -0.85 to -0.13). There was no significant effect on mortality, prostate, or cardiovascular outcomes., Conclusions: The adverse effects of testosterone therapy include an increase in hemoglobin and hematocrit and a small decrease in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. These findings are of unknown clinical significance. Current evidence about the safety of testosterone treatment in men in terms of patient-important outcomes is of low quality and is hampered by the brief study follow-up.

Some diabetes guidelines set low glycemic control goals for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (such as a hemoglobin A(1c) level as low as 6.5% to 7.0%) to avoid or delay complications. Our review and critique of recent large randomized trials in patients with type 2 diabetes suggest that tight glycemic control burdens patients with complex treatment programs, hypoglycemia, weight gain, and costs and offers uncertain benefits in return. We believe clinicians should prioritize supporting well-being and healthy lifestyles, preventive care, and cardiovascular risk reduction in these patients. Glycemic control efforts should individualize hemoglobin A(1c) targets so that those targets and the actions necessary to achieve them reflect patients' personal and clinical context and their informed values and preferences.

Cortisol is a pluripotent hormone that is vital in the host adaptation to stress. It is essential to maintain the normal vascular tone, endothelial integrity and vascular permeability. Consequently, the failure of an appropriate adrenal response in the setting of critical illness, alteration known as relative adrenal insufficiency, may have important clinical consequences. The diagnosis of this entity is not possible on clinical grounds and relies on the measurement of plasma cortisol levels prior and after adrenal stimulation with synthetic corticotrophin. Several studies performed in the general population have shown that relative adrenal insufficiency contributes to vascular hyporesponsiveness in septic shock and increases mortality. However, contradictory data exist regarding the effects of hydrocortisone administration in these patients. Moreover, recent studies indicate that relative adrenal insufficiency is very frequent in patients with advanced cirrhosis and septic shock and in fulminant hepatic failure. This chapter summarizes the main aspects of the physiopathology, diagnosis and treatment of this entity in patients with acute or chronic liver disease.

Background: Pancreas and kidney transplantation (PKTx) has become the treatment of choice in uremic patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). In these patients, the pancreatic graft provides an endogenous source of insulin. However, the determination of its long-term effect on metabolic control is crucial in order to establish the real efficacy of this treatment in diabetic patients. In this article, we describe the experience of the University of Barcelona in short- and long-term metabolic control in PKTx recipients., Subjects and Methods: We performed seriated determinations of glycosilated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) in 55 patients who underwent PKTx at our center from 1983 to 1996 with both grafts functioning for more than 1 yr (mean follow-up 4.2 +/- 2.3 yr). Basal glucose and insulin levels, areas under the curve (AUC) of glycemia and insulinemia after OGTT were analyzed throughout follow-up, as well as fasting insulin resistance index (FIRI)., Results: HbA1c levels throughout follow-up were within the normal range. The OGTT was normal in 80% of the patients 5 yr after transplantation. Hyperinsulinemia was present throughout follow-up. Over time, no differences were detected in the AUC of glycemia and insulinemia between controls and patients with PKTx. During the evolution, no differences were found in FIRI, in spite of increasing body weight., Conclusion: When successful, PKTx provides long-term normalization of glycemic control, assessed by HbA1c and OGTT, despite the existence of sustained hyperinsulinemia. Our results strongly suggest that PKTx is the most effective treatment for uremic patients with IDDM from a metabolic point of view.