Search

Objectives: To assess the prevalence of the most frequent functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) in Brazilian infants seen in private pediatric clinics and their relationship with cesarean delivery, breastfeeding, and history of prematurity., Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled 5080 infants under 12 months old with routine visits in private pediatric clinics in Brazil. The mothers answered questions about the type of delivery, type of feeding (breast milk, infant formula, cow milk, mixed feeding), history of prematurity, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Rome IV criteria were used to diagnose FGIDs., Results: The prevalence of infant regurgitation was 10.7% (487/4560); infant colic, 6.1% (131/2162); infant dyschezia, 4.0% (157/3895); functional constipation, 7.6% (341/4506); and functional diarrhea, 0.09% (2/2186). Prematurity was associated ( P < 0.05) with infant regurgitation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05, 1.90), infant colic (OR = 1.97; 95% CI: 1.19, 3.24), infant dyschezia (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.02, 2.64), and functional constipation (OR = 1.44; 95% CI: 1.02, 2.02). Prematurity was associated ( P < 0.001) with two or more FGIDs between 21 days and 150 days of age (OR = 3.06; 95% CI: 1.74, 5.37)., Conclusion: FGIDs are common in infants seen in the private pediatric practice in Brazil. History of prematurity was associated with infant regurgitation, infant colic, functional dyschezia, and functional constipation., (Copyright © 2022 by European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.)

Objective: To describe the type of milk used to feed infants seen in private pediatric practices in Brazil. To evaluate the relationship between breastfeeding, type of delivery, and history of prematurity., Methods: This is a cross-sectional and observational study that included 4929 infants in the first year of life seen in private pediatric practices in the five geographic regions of Brazil. Mothers provided information about the type of milk used by their infant, the type of delivery (vaginal or cesarean), and whether the birth was premature., Results: Breastfeeding was the only source of milk for 56.1% (1546/2755) of infants in the first six months of life and 32.9% (716/2174) in the second. Of the infants who received other types of milk besides breastfeeding, there was a predominance of infant formula in 98.6% and 93.8% of the infants, respectively, in the first and in the second six months of life. Whole cow's milk was used by 0.7% (20/2755) of infants in the first six months and by 4.1% (90/2174) of infants in the second (p < 0.001). In the first six months of life, breastfeeding as the only type of milk was associated with vaginal delivery (OR = 1.79; p < 0.001) and not having a history of prematurity (OR = 2.48; p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Breastfeeding was the only milk source for more than half of infants before 180 days of life. Birth by cesarean section and history of prematurity were negatively associated with breastfeeding as the only source of milk used in infant feeding., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Mauro Batista de Morais: Scientific advisor and/or Speaker for Danone Nutricia, Nestle, Ache/Biogaia, Merck, Biolab, Mead-Jonhson RB, Abbott. Marise Helena Cardoso Tofoli: Consultant and/or speaker for Danone Nutricia, Nestle. Karina Vieira de Barros: Former Danone Nutricia employee during the development of the survey. Cristina Helena Targa Ferreira: Consultant and/or speaker for Danone Nutricia, FQM, Natulab, Mead-Jonhson RB., (Copyright © 2021 Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.)

Background: Undernutrition is a common problem among children with congenital heart disease (CHD) and may lead to poorer surgical outcomes. A higher intake of energy during the postoperative period of CHD surgery seems to be associated with better outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the use of energy-enriched formula (EE-formula) compared with normocaloric formula during 30 days after CHD surgery., Methods: A randomized controlled trial with patients undergoing heart surgery in a tertiary hospital in southern Brazil from March 2017 to December 2017 was performed. The intervention group received EE-formula (1 kcal/mL), and the control group received normocaloric formula (0.67 kcal/mL). The researcher in charge of anthropometric evaluation was blinded to the randomization., Results: Fifty-nine patients were included; 30 in control group and 29 in intervention group. There were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding age, gender, anthropometry, and surgical risk classification after randomization. A statistically significant difference in z-score of weight for age and in weight gain variation rate between groups after intervention was observed. Antibiotic use was less frequent in the intervention group, and hospital length of stay was shorter. General gastrointestinal side effects were similar between groups, whereas diarrhea was more frequent in the intervention group. However, this side effect was limited and had spontaneous resolution in 4 out of 6 cases., Conclusion: This study demonstrates that EE-formula use after heart surgery of patients with CHD is well tolerated and may improve short-term nutrition outcome, decrease hospital stay, and reduce antibiotic use., (© 2019 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.)

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of a single intramuscular dose of bromopride, metoclopramide, or ondansetron for treating vomiting., Methods: Randomized controlled trial including children 1-12 years of age presenting with acute vomiting at the pediatric emergency department., Outcomes: Number of children that stopped vomiting at one, six, and 24h following treatment; episodes of diarrhea; acceptance of oral liquids; intravenous rehydration; return to hospital and side effects., Results: There were 175 children who completed the study. Within the first hour after treatment, all drugs were equally effective, with ondansetron preventing vomiting in 100%, bromopride in 96.6%, and metoclopramide in 94.8% of children (p=0.288). Within six hours, ondansetron was successful in preventing vomiting in 98.3% of children, compared to bromopride and metoclopramide, which were successful in 91.5% and 84.4% of patients, respectively (p=0.023). Within 24h, ondansetron was superior to both other agents, as it remained efficacious in reducing vomiting in 96.6% of children, as opposed to 67.8% and 67.2% with bromopride and metoclopramide, respectively (p=0.001). The ondansetron group showed better acceptance of oral liquids (p=0.05) when compared to the bromopride and metoclopramide. The ondansetron group did not show any side effects in 75.9% of cases, compared to 54.2% and 53.5% in the bromopride and metoclopramide groups, respectively. Somnolence was the most common side effect., Conclusions: A single dose of ondansetron is superior to bromopride and metoclopramide in preventing vomiting six hours and 24h following treatment. Oral fluid intake after receiving medication was statistically better with Ondansetronwhile also having less side effects compared to the other two agents., (Copyright © 2017 Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.)