Search

ABSTRACT Background Aim Methods Results Conclusions Three Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are approved for ulcerative colitis (UC) in Japan.To compare the real‐world efficacy and safety of these three JAK inhibitors in UC.This was a multicentre, retrospective study of patients with UC started on JAK inhibitors. The primary outcome was clinical remission at 10, 26 and 58 weeks, and at the most recent follow‐up. To compare the efficacy and safety among the JAK inhibitors, we created three matched cohorts (upadacitinib vs. filgotinib, tofacitinib vs. filgotinib and upadacitinib vs. tofacitinib) using propensity score matching.We identified 228 upadacitinib‐treated patients (median follow‐up 49 weeks; IQR 25–72), 215 filgotinib‐treated patients (follow‐up 56 weeks; IQR 17–82) and 159 tofacitinib‐treated patients (follow‐up 112 weeks; IQR 10–258). Clinical remission rates for upadacitinib, filgotinib and tofacitinib at the most recent follow‐up were 72.8%, 50.6% and 45.8%, respectively. Over 70% of the patients previously treated with other biologics or JAK inhibitors achieved clinical remission with upadacitinib. On multivariate analysis, the number of previous advanced therapies was inversely associated with the efficacy of filgotinib and tofacitinib. Comparative analysis showed that upadacitinib‐treated patients had higher efficacy and lower risk of discontinuation than patients treated with other JAK inhibitors. However, upadacitinib had a significant risk of acne.Considering the particularly high efficacy of upadacitinib, even in patients with refractory UC, filgotinib or tofacitinib may be considered as an upfront JAK inhibitor before using upadacitinib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Many women of childbearing age with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) require advanced therapies. While biologics are largely low risk during pregnancy, the novel small molecules tofacitinib, filgotinib, upadacitinib and ozanimod (TFUO) have shown concerning teratogenic effects, and decreased fertility in animal studies. Therefore, their use in women of childbearing age needs careful consideration. Design: RAND/University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Appropriateness Method (RAM). Objective: To evaluate the appropriateness of TFUO in women of childbearing age. Methods: We convened a panel of six gastroenterologists, two IBD nurses, one IBD pharmacist and three expert patients. Following a literature review, 13 statements were drafted and voted upon in 2 rounds. Results: All 13 statements were deemed appropriate. The panel concluded that women with IBD of childbearing age who wish to commence therapy with TFUO, need to use effective contraception and be counselled regarding the risk in unplanned pregnancies. For women using contraception while on Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) therapy, we suggest the preferred use of progesterone-only or non-hormonal long-acting contraception. TFUO are contraindicated during pregnancy and breast feeding. We recommend that women receiving TFUO cease therapy in time to establish clinical remission for at least 3 months prior to conception. Therapies other than TFUO should be considered as first-line therapy in women with IBD of childbearing age, except in select individual circumstances. TFUO may be appropriate for women of childbearing age after failure of, intolerance or contraindications to one biological agent. Conclusion: TFUO should be avoided during pregnancy and breastfeeding, and alternative therapies should be considered as first-line treatments. Summary: We provide clinical practice recommendations regarding the use of TFUO for IBD in women of childbearing age. Plain language summary: Small Molecules for Patients with IBD of Childbearing Age The maintenance of remission is vital for good fetal and maternal outcomes in IBD pregnancies and biological therapies used in IBD have been associated with favourable pregnancy outcomes. The safety profile of novel small molecules in human pregnancy is however largely unknown. We conducted a RAND appropriateness panel to agree recommendation son the use of Tofacitinib, Filgotinib, Upadacitinib and Ozanimod in women of childbearing age. Tofacitinib, Filgotinib, Upadacitinib and Ozanimod should be avoided during pregnancy due to serious concerns regarding birth defects. Small molecule therapies Tofacitinib, Filgotinib, Upadacitinib and Ozanimod should be given due consideration in the management of IBD in women of childbearing age, provided there are no immediate plans for conception. Counselling about potential risk of adverse effects during pregnancy, risk of venous thromboembolism and effective contraception are needed. Clinicians need to consider time to establish alternative therapies when switching away from Tofacitinib, Filgotinib, Upadacitinib and Ozanimod in the pre-conception period. Future research should examine pregnancy outcomes in cases where Tofacitinib, Filgotinib, Upadacitinib and Ozanimod exposure occurred but data may be difficult to compare to biologics due to differences in exposure duration. Guidelines should be updated as further maternal and fetal safety data become available [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: High baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been associated with positive responses to biologic tumor necrosis factor inhibition and negative responses to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) triple therapy. Datasets from three randomized clinical trials in patients with RA were used to test the hypothesis that baseline NLR is associated with improved clinical response to filgotinib in methotrexate (MTX)-naïve or MTX-experienced RA populations. Methods: Patients from FINCH 1 (inadequate response to MTX, MTX-IR; NCT02889796), FINCH 2 (inadequate response to biologic DMARDs; NCT02873936), and FINCH 3 (MTX-naïve; NCT02886728) were classified as baseline NLR-High or baseline NLR-Low based on a previously published cut point of 2.7. In total, 3365 patients were included across the three studies. Differences in clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were determined using linear-regression models. Results: Control-arm patients (placebo + MTX/placebo + csDMARD) classified as NLR-High exhibited worse continuous clinical and PRO responses at week 12 across clinical trials compared to NLR-Low patients. In contrast, NLR-High patients who received FIL 200 mg + MTX/csDMARD exhibited consistently better responses after 12 weeks compared to NLR-Low patients across clinical trials, clinical endpoints, and PROs. These trends were most prominent among the MTX-IR population. Conclusion: The 2.7 baseline NLR cut point could be used to enrich for patients most likely to benefit from the addition of filgotinib to background MTX/csDMARD. Use of baseline NLR as part of therapeutic decision-making would not require additional diagnostics and could contribute to improved outcomes for patients with RA. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02889796; NCT02873936; NCT02886728. Plain Language Summary: Rheumatoid arthritis is a disease that results in swollen and painful joints. There is currently no method to determine which treatment will work best for an individual patient. However, there may be identifying markers found in the blood that could indicate how a patient will respond to treatment. One of these possible markers is a ratio of two types of white blood cells, neutrophils and lymphocytes, which are part of the body's immune system and help the body detect and fight infection and other diseases. This ratio is referred to as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. The current study evaluated whether the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio at the beginning of treatment was associated with rheumatoid arthritis treatment outcomes. Blood test results were used from 3365 patients receiving filgotinib (a medicine used to treat rheumatoid arthritis) or other therapies as part of the FINCH clinical trials. Patients were classified as having a high or low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio at the start of treatment. Patients receiving filgotinib over 24 weeks who had a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio showed less disease activity than patients whose ratio was low. This study provides support for the use of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a way to help determine whether a patient would benefit from filgotinib as part of their rheumatoid arthritis treatment and may help improve rheumatoid arthritis treatment outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Introduction High baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been associated with positive responses to biologic tumor necrosis factor inhibition and negative responses to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) triple therapy. Datasets from three randomized clinical trials in patients with RA were used to test the hypothesis that baseline NLR is associated with improved clinical response to filgotinib in methotrexate (MTX)-naïve or MTX-experienced RA populations. Methods Patients from FINCH 1 (inadequate response to MTX, MTX-IR; NCT02889796), FINCH 2 (inadequate response to biologic DMARDs; NCT02873936), and FINCH 3 (MTX-naïve; NCT02886728) were classified as baseline NLR-High or baseline NLR-Low based on a previously published cut point of 2.7. In total, 3365 patients were included across the three studies. Differences in clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were determined using linear-regression models. Results Control-arm patients (placebo + MTX/placebo + csDMARD) classified as NLR-High exhibited worse continuous clinical and PRO responses at week 12 across clinical trials compared to NLR-Low patients. In contrast, NLR-High patients who received FIL 200 mg + MTX/csDMARD exhibited consistently better responses after 12 weeks compared to NLR-Low patients across clinical trials, clinical endpoints, and PROs. These trends were most prominent among the MTX-IR population. Conclusion The 2.7 baseline NLR cut point could be used to enrich for patients most likely to benefit from the addition of filgotinib to background MTX/csDMARD. Use of baseline NLR as part of therapeutic decision-making would not require additional diagnostics and could contribute to improved outcomes for patients with RA. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02889796; NCT02873936; NCT02886728.

Background: According to recent data, the age of patients could represent an important risk factor for MACE (major cardiovascular events), cancer, and VTE (venous thromboembolism) during treatment with JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis. We decided to analyze the population involved in the ReLiFiRa study by identifying two groups of patients: 65 years or more and less than 65 years of age, evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of 200 mg of Filgotinib daily. Methods: Of the 120 ReLiFiRa patients, 54 were younger than 65 years old and 66 patients were 65 years old or older. The data of efficacy and tolerability of treatment with FIL 200 mg daily for 6 months were evaluated. Results: After six months of treatment, FIL was effective in both age groups. In both groups, the median values of steroid DAS28, CDAI, ERS, PCR, tender joints, swollen joints, VAS, HAQ, PGA patients, and PGA physicians were reduced with a statistically significant difference comparing these values with the baseline values. The difference in age did not impact the effectiveness of the drug. The lipid profile data also did not demonstrate significant differences between the two age groups; however, the comparison between younger vs. older patients' populations regarding the total cholesterol/HDL ratio and LDL/HDL ratio shows a statistically significant difference: total cholesterol/HDL 3.4 (2.12–3.66) vs. 3.64 (3.36–4.13) p = 0.0004, LDL/HDL 1.9 (0.98–2.25) vs. 2.41 (2.04–2.73) p = 0.0002. There are no differences regarding the atherogenic index (LDL-C/HDL-C) and coronary risk index (TC/HDL-C) compared to baseline. Conclusions: After six months of treatment with FIL, the older population group showed a higher level of LDL and a lower level of HDL compared to younger patients. The atherogenic index and coronary risk index are higher in patients aged ≥ 65 years, but interestingly, there were no differences when comparing the 6-month data to baseline values. This condition highlights the impact of typical risk factors that act independently of treatment with Filgotinib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors represent a novel class of oral therapies showing efficacy in treating ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), challenging conventional treatment paradigms. Summary: This review provides an overview of the potential novel uses of JAK inhibitors, focusing on their current approved indications and exploring possibilities beyond these indications. Tofacitinib and filgotinib are approved for UC, while upadacitinib is approved for both UC and CD. Additionally, their potential in acute severe UC, as steroid alternatives, and in managing fistulizing CD or extraintestinal manifestations are discussed. Key Message: JAK inhibitors play an important role in IBD (inflammatory bowel disease) treatment; however, clinicians must balance their promising efficacy with safety concerns. Individualized care and vigilance are essential for optimizing therapeutic benefits while mitigating potential adverse effects. Further research is necessary to clarify their efficacy, safety, and potential applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims There is an unmet need in the treatment of perianal fistulising Crohn's disease [PFCD]. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the Janus kinase 1 preferential inhibitor, filgotinib, for the treatment of PFCD. Methods This phase 2, double-blind, multicentre trial enrolled adults with PFCD and prior treatment failure. Participants were randomised [2:2:1] to receive filgotinib 200 mg, filgotinib 100 mg, or placebo, once daily orally for up to 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was combined fistula response (reduction from baseline of at least one draining external opening determined by physical assessment, and no fluid collections >1 cm on pelvic magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) at Week 24. Results Between April 2017 and July 2020, 106 individuals were screened and 57 were randomised. Discontinuations were lowest in the filgotinib 200 mg group (3/17 [17.6%] versus 13/25 [52.0%] for filgotinib 100 mg and 9/15 [60.0%] for placebo). The proportion of participants who achieved a combined fistula response at Week 24 was 47.1% (8/17; 90% confidence interval [CI] 26.0, 68.9%) in the filgotinib 200 mg group, 29.2% [7/24; 90% CI 14.6, 47.9%] in the filgotinib 100 mg group, and 25.0% [3/12; 90% CI 7.2, 52.7%] in the placebo group. Serious adverse events occurred more frequently with filgotinib 200 mg (5/17 [29.4%]) than with placebo (1/15 [6.7%]). There were no treatment-related serious adverse events or deaths. Conclusions Filgotinib 200 mg was associated with numerical reductions in the number of draining perianal fistulas based on combined clinical and MRI findings compared with placebo, and was generally well tolerated [NCT03077412]. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims SELECTION is the first study to assess the impact of concomitant thiopurine and other immunomodulator [IM] use on the efficacy and safety of a Janus kinase inhibitor, filgotinib, in patients with ulcerative colitis. Methods Data from the phase 2b/3 SELECTION study were used for this post hoc analysis. Patients were randomised [2:2:1] to two induction studies [biologic-naive, biologic-experienced] to filgotinib 200 mg, 100 mg, or placebo. At Week 10, patients receiving filgotinib were re-randomised [2:1] to continue filgotinib or to switch to placebo until Week 58 [maintenance]. Outcomes were compared between subgroups with and without concomitant IM use. Results At Week 10, similar proportions of patients in the +IM and −IM groups treated with filgotinib 200 mg achieved Mayo Clinic Score [MCS] response [biologic-naive: 65.8% vs 66.9%; biologic-experienced: 61.3% vs 50.5%] and clinical remission [biologic-naive: 26.0% vs 26.2%; biologic-experienced: 11.3% vs 11.5%]. At Week 58, similar proportion of patients in the +IM and −IM groups treated with filgotinib 200 mg achieved MCS response [biologic-naive: 74.2% vs 75.0%; biologic-experienced: 45.5% vs 61.4%] and clinical remission [biologic-naive: 51.6% vs 47.4%; biologic-experienced: 22.7% vs 24.3%]. The probability of protocol-specified disease worsening during the maintenance study in patients treated with filgotinib 200 mg did not differ between +IM and −IM groups [ p  = 0.6700]. No differences were observed in the incidences of adverse events between +IM and −IM groups in the induction/maintenance studies. Conclusions The efficacy and safety profiles of filgotinib treatment in SELECTION did not differ with or without concomitant IM use. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02914522. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Filgotinib, a janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor, is used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RA‐associated interstitial lung disease (RA‐ILD) is a severe RA complication with no established effective treatment. We report the case of a patient with RA‐ILD successfully treated with filgotinib. A 46‐year‐old woman with RA and RA‐ILD, presenting with a non‐specific interstitial pneumonia pattern, was refractory to abatacept and prednisolone but responded to filgotinib. Both arthritis and RA‐ILD improved significantly, and the patient remained in remission for over 12 months. Basic research indicates that JAK1 plays a role in the cytokine signal transduction in ILD; however, there are no clinical reports on the efficacy of filgotinib in RA‐ILD. This case suggests filgotinib as a potential treatment for patients with RA‐ILD, particularly in the early stages of this disease.

Filgotinib, a janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor, is used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RA‐associated interstitial lung disease (RA‐ILD) is a severe RA complication with no established effective treatment. We report the case of a patient with RA‐ILD successfully treated with filgotinib. A 46‐year‐old woman with RA and RA‐ILD, presenting with a non‐specific interstitial pneumonia pattern, was refractory to abatacept and prednisolone but responded to filgotinib. Both arthritis and RA‐ILD improved significantly, and the patient remained in remission for over 12 months. Basic research indicates that JAK1 plays a role in the cytokine signal transduction in ILD; however, there are no clinical reports on the efficacy of filgotinib in RA‐ILD. This case suggests filgotinib as a potential treatment for patients with RA‐ILD, particularly in the early stages of this disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors represent a novel class of oral therapies showing efficacy in treating ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), challenging conventional treatment paradigms. Summary: This review provides an overview of the potential novel uses of JAK inhibitors, focusing on their current approved indications and exploring possibilities beyond these indications. Tofacitinib and filgotinib are approved for UC, while upadacitinib is approved for both UC and CD. Additionally, their potential in acute severe UC, as steroid alternatives, and in managing fistulizing CD or extraintestinal manifestations are discussed. Key Message: JAK inhibitors play an important role in IBD (inflammatory bowel disease) treatment; however, clinicians must balance their promising efficacy with safety concerns. Individualized care and vigilance are essential for optimizing therapeutic benefits while mitigating potential adverse effects. Further research is necessary to clarify their efficacy, safety, and potential applications.

Background and Aims Data regarding the effectiveness and safety of Janus kinase [JAK] inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate [S1P] receptor modulators in antibiotic refractory chronic pouchitis [CARP] are lacking. Methods This ECCO-CONFER project retrospectively collected data for JAK inhibitor or S1P receptor modulator treatments for CARP with at least 3 months of follow-up. The outcomes included corticosteroid- and antibiotic-free clinical response and remission at 3 and 12 months, and trends in modified pouchitis disease activity index [mPDAI], endoscopic PDAI, C-reactive protein, and calprotectin. Results Seventeen treatments in 15 patients were evaluated. Previous pouchitis treatments included infliximab [5/15], adalimumab [4/15], vedolizumab [9/15], and ustekinumab [5/15]. Pooling data on JAK inhibitors [eight tofacitinib, one filgotinib, and six upadacitinib] after 3 months [T3], steroid- and antibiotic-free clinical response was achieved in 53.3% [8/15], and steroid- and antibiotic-free clinical remission was achieved in 40% [6/15]. Of the patients with at least 12 months of follow-up, steroid- and antibiotic-free clinical response was achieved in 50% [3/6] and remission in one patient [16.7%], endoscopic response in 50% [3/6], and endoscopic remission in 50% [3/6]. Of the two ozanimod treatments at T3, steroid- and antibiotic-free clinical response was achieved in one patient, without remission; both discontinued ozanimod before T12. No side effects were reported. Conclusions Small molecules may represent a suitable option for CARP refractory to multiple biologics, deserving further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is evidence suggesting the existence of sex differences in the effectiveness of specific drug classes for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our study stands as the first to elucidate sex-related differences in the effectiveness of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. Methods: The study involved 150 RA patients treated with tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, or filgotinib between September 2017 and October 2023. Sex differences in achieving remission and low disease activity (LDA) were identified through logistic regression analyses. Sex disparities in treatment effectiveness survival were evaluated through the Kaplan–Meier estimate, employing the log-rank test for comparison. The Cox model was applied to analyze the variable sex as a potential factor that could influence the maintenance of the JAK inhibitor treatment effectiveness. Results: Concerning the achievement of remission and LDA, no differences were observed between sexes in terms of the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) C-reactive protein (CRP), the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI). With respect to the DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), female patients, compared to males, possessed 70% lower odds of achieving remission (p = 0.018) and 66% lower odds of achieving LDA (p = 0.023). No differences were observed in treatment effectiveness survival between sexes (p = 0.703). Sex was not found to influence the survival of JAK inhibitor treatment effectiveness (p = 0.704). Conclusions: Being a female or male patient does not entail differences in the effectiveness of the JAK inhibitor treatment. Our findings encourage the consideration of a global pool of composite indices (DAS28-ESR/CRP, CDAI, SDAI) to measure RA disease activity, thus individualizing the target value as advocated by the treat-to-target strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Janus kinase [JAK] inhibitors [JAKinibs] are effective small molecule therapies for treating Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC], collectively known as inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. By preventing JAKs from phosphorylating signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins, JAKinibs disrupt cytokine signalling pathways that promote inflammation. Despite considerable overlap in the JAKs they target, first- and second-generation JAKinibs display different clinical efficacies in CD and UC. Methods We conducted a comparative phosflow study of four JAKinibs [filgotinib, upadacitinib, tofacitinib, and deucravacitinib] to observe subtle mechanistic differences that may dictate their clinical behaviour. Resected mesenteric lymph node [MLN] cells from 19 patients [9 CD, 10 UC] were analysed by flow cytometry in the presence or absence of different cytokine stimuli and titrated JAKinibs. Results We found a higher potency of the JAK 1/3-preferential inhibitor, tofacitinib, for JAK 3-dependent cytokine signalling pathways in comparison to filgotinib, but a higher potency of the JAK 1-preferential inhibitors, filgotinib and upadacitinib, for JAK 3-independent cytokine signalling pathways. Deucravacitinib, a TYK2-preferential inhibitor, demonstrated a much narrower selectivity by inhibiting only IL-10 and IFN-β pathways, albeit more potently than the other JAKinibs. Additionally, we found some differences in the sensitivity of immune cells from CD versus UC, and patients with versus without a CD-associated NOD2 polymorphism, to phosphorylate signal transducer and activator of transcriptions in response to specific cytokine stimulation. Conclusions Despite their similarities, differences exist in the relative potencies of different JAKinibs against distinct cytokine families, to explain their clinical efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Janus kinases (JAKs) are a family of cytosolic tyrosine kinases that regulate cytokine signal transduction, including cytokines involved in a range of inflammatory diseases, such as RA, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis and IBD. Several small-molecule JAK inhibitors (JAKis) are now approved for the treatment of various immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. There are, however, key differences between these agents that could potentially translate into unique clinical profiles. Each JAKi has a unique chemical structure, resulting in a distinctive mode of binding within the catalytic cleft of the target JAK, and giving rise to distinct pharmacological characteristics. In addition, the available agents have differing selectivity for JAK isoforms, as well as off-target effects against non-JAKs. Other differences include effects on haematological parameters, DNA damage repair, reproductive toxicity and metabolism/elimination. Here we review the pharmacological profiles of the JAKis abrocitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, peficitinib, tofacitinib and upadacitinib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, necessitates long-term medical therapy to manage symptoms and prevent complications. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has emerged as a strategy to optimize treatment efficacy, particularly with anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) alpha drugs. This review explores the role of TDM for non-anti-TNF advanced therapies in IBD, focusing on vedolizumab, ustekinumab, tofacitinib, upadacitinib, risankizumab and ozanimod. Methods: The literature search, conducted through OVID (Medline) and PubMed, delves into proactive versus reactive TDM, timing of monitoring and methods for measuring drug levels and anti-drug antibodies. Results: While ustekinumab and vedolizumab exhibit exposure–response relationships, consensus on target levels and the role of TDM adjustments remains elusive. Limited data on risankizumab suggest a dose-dependent response, while for small molecule therapies (janus kinase inhibitors and ozanimod), the absence of real-world data and commercially available TDM tools pose challenges. Conclusion: At present, with the available data, there is a limited role for TDM in non-anti-TNF biologic and small-molecule therapies. This review underscores the need for further research to delineate the utility of TDM in guiding treatment decisions for these agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims Maintenance treatment for ulcerative colitis may be discontinued for multiple reasons. This post hoc analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of re-treatment with filgotinib, an oral, once-daily, Janus kinase 1 preferential inhibitor, in the phase 2b/3 SELECTION trial and its long-term extension [LTE] study in ulcerative colitis. Methods Partial Mayo Clinic Score [pMCS] response and remission were evaluated in patients who received induction with filgotinib 200 mg [FIL200] or 100 mg [FIL100], were randomized to treatment withdrawal [placebo] during maintenance, and following disease worsening, were re-treated with open-label FIL200 in the LTE study. Factors were evaluated for association with pMCS remission at LTE week 12, and safety outcomes were reported. Results Analyses included 86 patients [FIL200: n  = 51; FIL100: n  = 35]. Median time to disease worsening following treatment withdrawal was 15.1 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.1–18.7) for FIL200-induced patients and 9.6 weeks [95% CI: 6.3–12.0] for FIL100-induced patients. Three-quarters [75%] of patients achieved a pMCS response within 4–5 weeks of re-treatment in both groups. At LTE week 48, pMCS remission was achieved by 45.1% and 51.4% of FIL200- and FIL100-induced patients, respectively. Factors independently associated with restoring efficacy included no concomitant use of corticosteroids at induction baseline, and high albumin levels, pMCS remission, and endoscopic score at maintenance baseline. No new safety signals were reported among re-treated patients. Conclusions In induction responders, re-treatment with FIL200 following temporary withdrawal from therapy restores response and/or remission in the majority of patients within 12 weeks. Re-treatment is well-tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02914522, NCT02914535 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This post hoc analysis of the phase 3 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) filgotinib clinical trial program assessed the effect of filgotinib on body mass index (BMI) in patients with RA and the impact of BMI on the efficacy and safety of filgotinib. Methods: FINCH 1–3 were randomized, double-blind, active- or placebo-controlled phase 3 trials of filgotinib 100 and 200 mg in patients with RA (N = 3452). BMI assessments included the mean change from baseline in BMI and the proportion of patients whose BMI increased by incremental thresholds. Efficacy measures included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response and low disease activity/remission according to Disease Activity Score 28 using C-reactive protein. The exposure-adjusted incident rate (EAIR) of adverse events (AEs) was assessed by baseline BMI, using integrated data from the FINCH 1–4 and the phase 2 DARWIN 1–3 studies (total filgotinib exposure = 8085 patient-years). Results: Mean change from baseline in BMI over time was similar across treatment arms. In most patients, BMI increased by ≤ 1 or 2 kg/m2 at both weeks 12 and 24, regardless of treatment group or baseline BMI; few patients had increases of ≥ 4 kg/m2. For most efficacy measures, filgotinib 200 mg was more efficacious than filgotinib 100 mg or active comparators or placebo across BMI subgroups. For the higher filgotinib dose, the EAIR of serious treatment-emergent AEs, venous thrombotic and embolic events, and major adverse cardiovascular events increased with increasing BMI. Conclusions: Filgotinib did not lead to substantial changes in BMI, and BMI did not appear to affect the efficacy of filgotinib. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02889796, NCT02873936, NCT02886728, NCT03025308, NCT01888874, NCT01894516, NCT02065700. Plain Language Summary: Some rheumatoid arthritis treatments cause patients to gain weight or are less effective in patients with obesity than in patients without obesity. Also, obesity can make rheumatoid arthritis worse. Filgotinib is a rheumatoid arthritis treatment that was evaluated in seven randomized clinical studies (FINCH 1–4 and DARWIN 1–3). We investigated whether filgotinib causes changes in weight and whether body mass index (BMI) affects the efficacy or safety of filgotinib. We analyzed how the BMI of patients who participated in FINCH 1, 2, or 3 changed over time. Most patients had a small increase in BMI (around 1–2 kg/m2) after 24 weeks of filgotinib treatment. This change in BMI was not affected by patients' BMI at baseline. Baseline BMI did not impact the efficacy of filgotinib, which was assessed using standard measures of disease activity. Filgotinib was more effective than other rheumatoid arthritis treatments and placebo in all patients, regardless of BMI subgroup. Using safety data from all seven clinical studies (FINCH 1–4 and DARWIN 1–3), we found that some adverse events occurred more often in patients with obesity (a BMI of ≥ 30 kg/m2) than in those without obesity. The increased adverse events included venous thrombotic and embolic events and major adverse cardiovascular events, for which obesity is a known risk factor. These results show that filgotinib did not substantially change BMI (which increased by around 1–2 kg/m2 in most patients), and that baseline BMI did not affect the efficacy of filgotinib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Filgotinib is an oral preferential Janus kinase 1 inhibitor that demonstrated significant reductions in radiographic progression, with an acceptable tolerability and safety profile, vs placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX-IR; FINCH 1) and vs MTX in MTX-naïve patients with RA (FINCH 3). International treatment guidelines identify multiple poor prognostic factors (PPFs) associated with worse disease outcomes among patients with RA. However, questions remain both about the clinical utility of considering PPFs and about which PPFs should drive treatment decisions. Additionally, the role of radiographic findings in clinical practice continues to be discussed and to evolve. This review examines radiographic results from post hoc analyses of phase 3 trials of filgotinib that examined subgroups with 4 PPFs or with baseline estimated rapid radiographic progression (e-RRP). In MTX groups, there were trends toward greater progression among patients with 4 PPFs or e-RRP, suggesting these subgroups may comprise a higher-risk population. Results show general consistency for the efficacy of filgotinib 200 mg plus MTX vs placebo plus MTX/MTX monotherapy on radiographic assessments, including change from baseline in modified total Sharp score and proportions without radiographic progression, even among MTX-IR or MTX-naïve patients with 4 PPFs or e-RRP who may be at higher risk of bone damage. Multivariate analysis identified multiple factors associated with baseline e-RRP status. This summary of the current understanding of benefits associated with filgotinib on radiographic progression and the relevance of baseline factors to these benefits may help inform treatment decisions for patients facing high risk of radiographic progression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Enthesitis is a key feature of spondyloarthropathy (SpA). In recent years, JAK inhibitors have emerged as efficacious drugs in the landscape of advanced therapies for patients with SpA. Method: The aim of this scoping literature review was to search the published literature for studies on JAK inhibitors and their effects on enthesitis in patients with SpA and evaluate the data and summarise the findings. The clinical trials reviewed used the Leeds Enthesitis Index, Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Enthesitis Index, and Maastrich Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score as outcome measures. Results: Tofacitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib had numerically greater reductions in the enthesitis scores when compared with placebo. Conclusion: While the JAK inhibitors are therapeutic options for enthesitis in SpA, head‐to‐head studies are needed to compare the JAK inhibitors against the biological drugs (targeting TNF, IL‐17, and IL‐12/23) as well as studies showing the effects of JAK inhibitors on enthesitis imaging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Immunology Quarterly / Immunológiai Szemle is the property of Medicina Konyvkiado Zrt. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract Filgotinib is an oral preferential Janus kinase 1 inhibitor that demonstrated significant reductions in radiographic progression, with an acceptable tolerability and safety profile, vs placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX-IR; FINCH 1) and vs MTX in MTX-naïve patients with RA (FINCH 3). International treatment guidelines identify multiple poor prognostic factors (PPFs) associated with worse disease outcomes among patients with RA. However, questions remain both about the clinical utility of considering PPFs and about which PPFs should drive treatment decisions. Additionally, the role of radiographic findings in clinical practice continues to be discussed and to evolve. This review examines radiographic results from post hoc analyses of phase 3 trials of filgotinib that examined subgroups with 4 PPFs or with baseline estimated rapid radiographic progression (e-RRP). In MTX groups, there were trends toward greater progression among patients with 4 PPFs or e-RRP, suggesting these subgroups may comprise a higher-risk population. Results show general consistency for the efficacy of filgotinib 200 mg plus MTX vs placebo plus MTX/MTX monotherapy on radiographic assessments, including change from baseline in modified total Sharp score and proportions without radiographic progression, even among MTX-IR or MTX-naïve patients with 4 PPFs or e-RRP who may be at higher risk of bone damage. Multivariate analysis identified multiple factors associated with baseline e-RRP status. This summary of the current understanding of benefits associated with filgotinib on radiographic progression and the relevance of baseline factors to these benefits may help inform treatment decisions for patients facing high risk of radiographic progression.

Abstract Introduction This post hoc analysis of the phase 3 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) filgotinib clinical trial program assessed the effect of filgotinib on body mass index (BMI) in patients with RA and the impact of BMI on the efficacy and safety of filgotinib. Methods FINCH 1–3 were randomized, double-blind, active- or placebo-controlled phase 3 trials of filgotinib 100 and 200 mg in patients with RA (N = 3452). BMI assessments included the mean change from baseline in BMI and the proportion of patients whose BMI increased by incremental thresholds. Efficacy measures included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response and low disease activity/remission according to Disease Activity Score 28 using C-reactive protein. The exposure-adjusted incident rate (EAIR) of adverse events (AEs) was assessed by baseline BMI, using integrated data from the FINCH 1–4 and the phase 2 DARWIN 1–3 studies (total filgotinib exposure = 8085 patient-years). Results Mean change from baseline in BMI over time was similar across treatment arms. In most patients, BMI increased by ≤ 1 or 2 kg/m2 at both weeks 12 and 24, regardless of treatment group or baseline BMI; few patients had increases of ≥ 4 kg/m2. For most efficacy measures, filgotinib 200 mg was more efficacious than filgotinib 100 mg or active comparators or placebo across BMI subgroups. For the higher filgotinib dose, the EAIR of serious treatment-emergent AEs, venous thrombotic and embolic events, and major adverse cardiovascular events increased with increasing BMI. Conclusions Filgotinib did not lead to substantial changes in BMI, and BMI did not appear to affect the efficacy of filgotinib. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02889796, NCT02873936, NCT02886728, NCT03025308, NCT01888874, NCT01894516, NCT02065700.

This article discusses the implications of novel therapies for women of reproductive age with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It highlights the challenges faced by women with IBD who wish to start or extend their families, as active disease can lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes. The article examines the use of biologic drugs and small molecule drugs (SMDs) in pregnancy, noting that biologics have a favorable safety profile, while SMDs have shown concerns in animal studies. The authors recommend counseling women of childbearing age about IBD and pregnancy, and suggest that SMDs may not be appropriate for women planning to conceive in the near future. The article emphasizes the importance of a holistic approach to IBD management, including non-pharmacological interventions and considerations for physical and mental health. It concludes by stating that the current advice regarding SMDs and pregnancy is largely based on animal data, and more research is needed to determine their safety in human pregnancies. [Extracted from the article]

AbstractRecent studies have gradually elucidated the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease; thus, the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducers and activators of transcription pathway are strongly involved in the pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel disease. Generally, Janus kinase inhibitors are being used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and other immunological diseases, with the therapeutic promising effects. Currently, in Japan, three Janus kinase inhibitors, namely tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib, are available for the treatment of patients with active ulcerative colitis. Therefore, evaluating the efficacy and safety of each JAK inhibitor is essential for determining the role of JAK inhibitors in future therapeutic strategies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

This point of view explores the safety concerns of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAK-Is), used in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other rheumatologic conditions. Increasing evidence shows that JAK-Is may elevate the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), especially pulmonary embolism. This fact has prompted the European Medicines Agency to advise cautious use of these drugs in patients over 65, smokers, and those at risk of cardiovascular issues or cancer. The paper analyses the evidence on the association between VTE risk and RA and whether different JAK-Is pose different risks. It also probes the link between VTE, lipids, and JAK inhibition, noting that JAK-Is can alter HDL and LDL levels. On the other hand, some evidence indicates that tighter LDL-cholesterol control could mitigate VTE risk, particularly pulmonary embolism. Moreover, data from trials show little attention to treating this main cardiovascular and VTE risk factor in rheumatological patients. Although the lipid paradox theory emphasizes the U-shaped relationship between LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular risk in patients with RA, uncontrolled levels of clinically relevant LDL cholesterol remain closely linked to cardiovascular and VTE risk. In conclusion, high-potency statins could help to manage the increased cardiovascular and VTE risk concomitant to JAK-Is treatment in rheumatologic patients without depriving them of the best therapeutic choice and, in addition, reducing the inherent risk associated with the disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Filgotinib (FIL) is a selective JAK1 inhibitor with an affinity 30-fold higher than JAK2, approved to treat moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), in adults with inadequate response or intolerance to one or more disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicentric study in order to evaluate efficacy and safety of FIL 200 mg daily therapy, after 3 and 6 months, in 120 patients affected by RA, managed in Tuscany and Umbria rheumatological centers. The following clinical records were analyzed: demographical data, smoking status, previous presence of comorbidities (Herpes zoster -HZ- infection, venous thromboembolism -VTE-, major adverse cardiovascular events -MACE-, cancer, diabetes, and hypertension), disease duration, presence of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA), rheumatoid factor (RF), number of biological failures, and prior csDMARDs utilized. At baseline, and after 3 (T3) and 6 (T6) months of FIL therapy, we evaluated mean steroid dosage, csDMARDs intake, clinimetric indexes (DAS28, CDAI, HAQ, patient and doctor PGA, VAS), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and body mass index (BMI). Results: At baseline, the mean disease duration was 9.4 ± 7.5 years; the prevalence of previous HZ infection, VTE, MACE, and cancer was respectively 4.12%, 0%, 7.21%, and 0.83%, respectively. In total, 76.3% of patients failed one or more biologics (one biological failure, 20.6%; two biological failures, 27.8%; three biological failures, 16.5%; four biological failures, 10.3%; five biological failures, 1.1%). After 3 months of FIL therapy, all clinimetric index results significantly improved from baseline, as well as after 6 months. Also, ESR and CRP significatively decreased at T3 and T6. Two cases of HZ were recorded, while no new MACE, VTE, or cancer were recorded during the observation time. Conclusion: Despite the limitations of the retrospective study and of the observational period of only 6 months, real-life data on the treatment of RA patients with FIL demonstrate that this Jak inhibitor therapy is safe in terms of CV, VTE events, and occurrence of cancer, and is also effective in a population identified as "difficult to treat" due to failure of previous b-DMARD therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent studies have gradually elucidated the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease; thus, the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducers and activators of transcription pathway are strongly involved in the pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel disease. Generally, Janus kinase inhibitors are being used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and other immunological diseases, with the therapeutic promising effects. Currently, in Japan, three Janus kinase inhibitors, namely tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib, are available for the treatment of patients with active ulcerative colitis. Therefore, evaluating the efficacy and safety of each JAK inhibitor is essential for determining the role of JAK inhibitors in future therapeutic strategies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Administration of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs has dramatically improved even the clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). Dysregulation of JAK-STAT pathways via overproduction of cytokines, such as interleukin-6, is involved in the pathogenesis of RA. Filgotinib is a selective JAK1 inhibitor pending approval for use in RA. By inhibition of the JAK-STAT pathway, filgotinib is effective in suppressing disease activity and preventing the progression of joint destruction. Similarly, interleukin-6 inhibitors such as tocilizumab also inhibit the JAK-STAT pathways by inhibition of interleukin-6 signaling. We present the protocol for a study that will evaluate whether the effectiveness of filgotinib monotherapy is non-inferior to that of tocilizumab monotherapy in RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX. Methods This study is an interventional, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, and non-inferiority clinical trial with a 52-week follow-up. Study participants will be 400 RA patients with at least moderate disease activity during treatment with MTX. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to administer filgotinib monotherapy or subcutaneous tocilizumab monotherapy switched from MTX. We will evaluate disease activity by measuring clinical disease activity indices and by using musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS). The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who achieve an American College of Rheumatology 50 response at week 12. Secondary endpoints are changes from baseline in the MSUS scores. We will also comprehensively analyze serum levels of multiple biomarkers, such as cytokines and chemokines. Discussion The study results are expected to show the non-inferiority of the effectiveness of filgotinib monotherapy to that of tocilizumab monotherapy in RA patients with inadequate response to MTX. The strength of this study is its prospective evaluation of therapeutic efficacy using not only clinical disease activity indices, but also MSUS, which accurately and objectively evaluates disease activity at the joint level among patients drawn from multiple centers with a standardized evaluation by MSUS. We will evaluate the effectiveness of both drugs by integrating multilateral assessments—clinical disease activity indices, MSUS findings, and serum biomarkers. Trial registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials ( https://jrct.niph.go.jp ) jRCTs071200107. Registered on March 3, 2021. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05090410. Registered on October 22, 2021.

Background and Aims The efficacy of new therapies for ulcerative colitis [UC] is usually influenced by previous biologic use. These post hoc analyses of SELECTION, a placebo-controlled phase 2b/3 trial in patients with moderately to severely active UC, evaluated the efficacy of filgotinib, an oral Janus 1 kinase preferential inhibitor, with respect to prior biologic failure. Methods The effect of filgotinib 200 mg (FIL200) relative to placebo was compared in biologic-naïve and biologic-failed patient groups, and in further subgroups by number of failed biologics [1 or >1], biologic mechanism of action [MoA] classes [1 or 2] and tumour necrosis factor [TNF] antagonists [1 or >1]. Odds ratios [ORs] for clinical remission at week 10 [induction] and hazard ratios [HRs] for protocol-specific disease worsening [PSDW] from week 11 to week 58 [maintenance] were calculated. Results At week 10, FIL200-treated patients were more likely to achieve clinical remission than placebo-treated patients in the biologic-naïve (OR [95% confidence interval, CI]: 1.98 [1.14–3.44]) and biologic-failed (3.91 [1.33–11.48]) groups. During maintenance, FIL200-treated patients had a reduced risk of PSDW in the biologic-naïve (HR [95% CI]: 0.22 [0.11–0.44]) and biologic-failed (0.22 [0.12–0.40]) groups, and in all biologic-failed subgroups (except >1 TNF antagonist failure). The data suggest that the likelihood of PSDW at week 58 increased with increasing numbers of failed biologics. Conclusions FIL200 induced and maintained benefits relative to placebo regardless of previous biologic use; however, the estimated therapeutic benefit was greatest in biologic-naïve patients and patients previously treated with one biologic or biologic MoA class. [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02914522]. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A sensitive and rapid LC–MS/MS method has been developed and validated for the quantification of paxalisib in mouse plasma. A liquid–liquid extraction method was used for the extraction of paxalisib and filgotinib (internal standard, IS) from mouse plasma. A clean chromatographic separation of paxalisib and the IS was achieved on an Atlantis dC18 column using an isocratic mobile phase (10 mM ammonium formate and acetonitrile, 30:70%, v/v) delivered at a flow rate of 0.7 mL/min. The total run time was 2.5 min. Paxalisib and filgotinib were eluted at 1.21 and 0.94 min, respectively. The MS/MS transitions monitored were m/z 383.25 → 309.20 and 426.30 → 291.20 for paxalisib and filgotinib, respectively. Method validation was performed as per US Food and Drug Administration guidelines and the results met the acceptance criteria. The method was proved to be accurate and precise at a linearity range of 1.39–2287 ng/mL. The intra‐ and inter‐day precisions for paxalisib in mouse plasma were in the ranges 1.42–9.61 and 4.70–9.63%, respectively. Paxalisib was stable under a series of stability conditions. Post‐oral administration to mice, paxalisib maximum plasma concentrations were attained at 2.0 h. Paxalisib's half‐life ranged between 3.2 and 4.2 h. Paxalisib exhibited low clearance and moderate volume of distribution. Oral bioavailability was 71%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of filgotinib (FIL) for Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and limited/no prior methotrexate (MTX) exposure. We present a Japanese population subanalysis of a global randomised-controlled trial at Week 52 and interim long-term extension (LTE) to Week 48 through June 2020. Methods: Patients were randomised to FIL 200 mg plus MTX, FIL 100 mg plus MTX, FIL 200 mg, or MTX for 52 weeks. At completion, eligible patients could enrol in the LTE. Those receiving FIL continued; those receiving MTX were rerandomised (blinded) to FIL 200 or 100 mg upon discontinuation of MTX. After a 4-week washout period, MTX could be re-added. Results: Adverse event rates at Week 52 and in the LTE to Week 48 were comparable across treatment groups. Week 52 American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) rates were 83% (19/23), 82% (9/11), 75% (9/12), and 76% (19/25) for FIL 200 mg plus MTX, FIL 100 mg plus MTX, FIL 200 mg, and MTX, respectively. Through LTE Week 48, ACR20 rates were maintained. Conclusions: In the 56 Japanese patients treated with FIL, efficacy was maintained through Week 52 and beyond, with no increases in the incidence of adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To present safety and efficacy of the JAK1 preferential inhibitor filgotinib in Japanese patients with prior inadequate response (IR) to methotrexate (MTX) from a 52-week randomised controlled parent study (PS) and long-term extension (LTE) through June 2020. Methods: The PS (NCT02889796) randomised MTX-IR patients to filgotinib 200 (FIL200) or 100 mg (FIL100), adalimumab (ADA) 40 mg, or placebo; all took stable background MTX. At week (W) 24, placebo patients were rerandomised to FIL200 or FIL100. The primary endpoint was W12 American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement; safety was assessed by adverse event (AE) reporting. For the LTE (NCT03025308), eligible filgotinib patients continued FIL200/FIL100; ADA patients were rerandomised (blinded) to FIL200 or FIL100; all continued MTX. Results: In all, 114/147 Japanese patients completed the PS, 115 enrolled in LTE, and 103 remained on study in June 2020. In the PS, AEs were consistent with the overall population, and W24 efficacy was maintained or improved through W52, comparable with the overall population. LTE AE incidences were similar between doses; filgotinib efficacy was consistent from baseline to W48 and similar between PS ADA and filgotinib patients. Conclusions: Among MTX-IR Japanese patients, filgotinib maintained efficacy over 1 year; LTE safety was consistent with the PS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims The safety and efficacy of filgotinib, a once-daily oral Janus kinase 1 preferential inhibitor, were evaluated in Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) in the phase 2b/3 SELECTION trial. Methods SELECTION (NCT02914522) was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial comprising 2 induction studies and a maintenance study. Adults with moderately to severely active UC were randomized in induction study A (biologic-naïve) or B (biologic-experienced) to receive filgotinib 200 mg, 100 mg, or placebo once daily for 11 weeks. Patients in clinical remission or Mayo Clinic score response at week 10 entered the 47-week maintenance study. Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed in Japanese patients enrolled in Japan. Results Overall, 37 and 72 Japanese patients were enrolled in Japan in induction studies A and B, respectively, and 54 entered the maintenance study. Numerically higher proportions of filgotinib 200 mg-treated than placebo-treated patients achieved clinical remission in induction study A (4/15 [26.7%] vs. 0/6 [0%]) and the maintenance study (5/20 [25.0%] vs. 0/9 [0%]), but not induction study B (1/29 [3.4%] vs. 1/14 [7.1%]). Both doses were well tolerated, and no new safety signals were noted. Herpes zoster was reported in 1 filgotinib 200 mg-treated patient in each of induction study A (2.3%, 1/44) and the maintenance study (5.0%, 1/20). Conclusions These data, alongside those of the overall SELECTION population, suggest the potential of filgotinib 200 mg as a viable treatment option for Japanese patients with UC. Owing to small patient numbers, data should be interpreted cautiously.

Abstract Introduction We conducted a post hoc analysis of efficacy and safety of filgotinib stratified by estimated radiographic progression rate before baseline (BL) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX; FINCH 1; NCT02889796) or were naïve to it (FINCH 3; NCT02886728). Methods Radiographic progression rate was BL-Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) divided by RA duration (BL mTSS/year); estimated rapid radiographic progression (e-RRP) was BL change in mTSS/year ≥ 5; and estimated nonrapid radiographic progression (e-NRRP) was BL mTSS/year

Abstract Introduction This exploratory analysis of FINCH 1 (NCT02889796) examined filgotinib (FIL) efficacy and safety in a subgroup of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX; MTX-IR) who had four poor prognostic factors (PPFs). Methods Patients with MTX-IR received placebo up to week (W)24 or FIL200 mg, FIL100 mg, or adalimumab up to W52; all received MTX. Efficacy and safety data were stratified by four PPFs versus fewer than four PPFs: seropositivity, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 6 mg/L, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with CRP > 5.1, and erosions on X-rays. Results At baseline, 687/1755 patients had four PPFs. At W12, whether with four PPFs or fewer than four PPFs, response rates on all American College of Rheumatology (ACR) measures were significantly greater with FIL200 and FIL100 versus placebo. At W52, FIL200 ACR20/50/70 response rates remained at least numerically higher versus adalimumab in both subgroups. At W52, FIL200 reduced modified total Sharp score (mTSS) change versus adalimumab in patients with four or fewer than four PPFs. Conclusions In high-risk (four PPFs) patients with MTX-IR RA, FIL200 and FIL100 showed similar reductions in disease activity versus placebo at W12 as in patients with fewer than four PPFs. mTSS in patients receiving FIL200 changed little from W24 to W52, while that in patients receiving FIL100 progressed comparably to patients who received adalimumab. Tolerability was comparable across treatment arms and subgroups.

Plain Language Summary Clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis recruit too few patients from diverse ethnic backgrounds to be able to identify differences in treatment outcomes. In adults with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis who do not tolerate or have responded poorly to other advanced treatments, the Janus kinase inhibitor filgotinib can be used alone or in combination with the immunosuppressant methotrexate. Using data from 4695 patients with rheumatoid arthritis from five previous clinical trials and two ongoing trial extensions, this paper examined the efficacy and safety of filgotinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis across geographic locations worldwide. Patients were grouped by region: North America, South and Central America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, East Asia, South and Southeast Asia, and Other (South Africa, New Zealand, Australia, and Israel). The efficacy of filgotinib in treating the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis was assessed using several measures of disease activity, with changes in patient quality of life determined using a health assessment questionnaire. Safety data were reported as the rates of side effects experienced by patients. Across different geographic regions, no major differences in filgotinib treatment response were observed. Rheumatoid arthritis disease activity levels were consistently lower in patients receiving filgotinib than in patients receiving placebo. Across the regions examined, quality-of-life scores also improved to a greater degree in patients receiving filgotinib compared with placebo. The rates of side effects, including infections, were similar irrespective of region. The number of deaths was low, mostly resulting from cardiovascular events, infections, and malignancies. This study demonstrates that the efficacy and safety of filgotinib are consistent in patients with rheumatoid arthritis from a broad range of geographic regions and ethnic backgrounds.

Background: Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) is a new therapeutic class in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Four molecules are approved in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Europe. Recently, questions have raised about adverse events. In this context, a synthesis of the efficacy data of JAKis in RA is of use. Method: We performed a literature review based on published articles about efficacy of JAKis in RA, including clinical trials, registries, retrospective and prospective cohorts as well as database analysis. Results: Based on the phase III clinical trials, JAKis are effective in comparison to placebo, methotrexate and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. Based on registries, cohorts and post hoc analysis of phase III clinical trials, several parameters might modulate the efficacy of JAKis: the serological status, a short duration of the disease or the presence of poor prognostic factors. Preliminary data suggest that early ultrasonographic evaluation might help to predict the medium-term progression. Conclusion: Some clinical, biological and imaging parameters seem to influence the response to JAKis and should be evaluated in larger studies. In addition to factors that might influence the efficacy of JAKis, the safety profile and risk factors should be considered before initiating JAKis in a patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are an emerging class of small-molecule drugs, providing targeted therapy for a variety of diseases, and have made their way into the treatment of armamentarium of ulcerative colitis (UC) in recent years. This review focuses on the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of selective JAK1 inhibitors in the treatment of moderate-to-severe UC. The PubMed database and clinicaltrials.gov were consulted using keywords – further expanded in the methods section. The search was focused on full-text publications in English. No publication date restrictions were imposed. JAK1 inhibitors are small-molecule drugs used in the treatment of ulcerative colitis and other immune mediated inflammatory diseases. They are orally bioavailable and have a rapid mechanism of action and no immunogenicity. JAK inhibitors can be used for the management of both naïve patients and biological-experienced patients. Particular attention should be paid to elderly patients or those with cardiovascular or oncological risk factors, in whom JAK inhibitors should be recommended only if no alternatives are available. In addition, JAK inhibitors have the potential to be combined with other biological drugs or small molecules for the management of difficult-to-treat cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The validity and relevance of histologic disease activity in Crohn's disease (CD) is unclear, owing to disconnects with endoscopic pathology. Here, we explore relationships between endoscopic, histologic, and molecular activity. This post hoc analysis of the Phase 2 FITZROY trial (NCT02048618) assessed baseline and week 10 (W10) inflammation across matched ileal and colonic segments in CD patients receiving filgotinib 200 mg (n = 42) vs placebo (n = 18). Macroscopic and microscopic disease were assessed by Simple Endoscopic Score for CD ulceration subscore (uSES-CD) and Global Histologic Activity Score activity subscore (aGHAS), respectively. Molecular activity was quantified by phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription (pSTAT)1 and pSTAT3 in epithelium and nonepithelium. Segments were classified as "low" or "high" activity; correlations and concordance were calculated. Logistic regression identified W10 outcome predictors. Overall, 300 segments in 60 patients were assessed. Baseline uSES-CD and aGHAS correlations were 0.72 and 0.53 in colon and ileum, respectively. pSTAT levels had poor-to-moderate concordance with uSES-CD (κ range, 0.11–0.49) but moderate-to-good concordance with aGHAS (0.43–0.77). With filgotinib vs placebo, uSES-CD and aGHAS decreased in significantly more segments with high baseline uSES-CD and aGHAS, and significantly more segments with high baseline pSTAT improved at W10. pSTAT1 was more sensitive to change than uSES-CD and aGHAS. Low baseline pSTAT3 in colon nonepithelium predicted W10 low uSES-CD (P =.044). There was better concordance between histologic and molecular disease activity associated with higher sensitivity to change vs endoscopic severity in ileocolonic CD. Our results suggest histologic activity be included in the assessment of CD inflammatory burden. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Administration of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs has dramatically improved even the clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). Dysregulation of JAK-STAT pathways via overproduction of cytokines, such as interleukin-6, is involved in the pathogenesis of RA. Filgotinib is a selective JAK1 inhibitor pending approval for use in RA. By inhibition of the JAK-STAT pathway, filgotinib is effective in suppressing disease activity and preventing the progression of joint destruction. Similarly, interleukin-6 inhibitors such as tocilizumab also inhibit the JAK-STAT pathways by inhibition of interleukin-6 signaling. We present the protocol for a study that will evaluate whether the effectiveness of filgotinib monotherapy is non-inferior to that of tocilizumab monotherapy in RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX. Methods: This study is an interventional, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, and non-inferiority clinical trial with a 52-week follow-up. Study participants will be 400 RA patients with at least moderate disease activity during treatment with MTX. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to administer filgotinib monotherapy or subcutaneous tocilizumab monotherapy switched from MTX. We will evaluate disease activity by measuring clinical disease activity indices and by using musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS). The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who achieve an American College of Rheumatology 50 response at week 12. Secondary endpoints are changes from baseline in the MSUS scores. We will also comprehensively analyze serum levels of multiple biomarkers, such as cytokines and chemokines. Discussion: The study results are expected to show the non-inferiority of the effectiveness of filgotinib monotherapy to that of tocilizumab monotherapy in RA patients with inadequate response to MTX. The strength of this study is its prospective evaluation of therapeutic efficacy using not only clinical disease activity indices, but also MSUS, which accurately and objectively evaluates disease activity at the joint level among patients drawn from multiple centers with a standardized evaluation by MSUS. We will evaluate the effectiveness of both drugs by integrating multilateral assessments—clinical disease activity indices, MSUS findings, and serum biomarkers. Trial registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (https://jrct.niph.go.jp) jRCTs071200107. Registered on March 3, 2021. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05090410. Registered on October 22, 2021. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Arianna Dal Buono,1 Roberto Gabbiadini,1 Virginia Solitano,1,2 Edoardo Vespa,1,2 Tommaso Lorenzo Parigi,1,2 Alessandro Repici,2,3 Antonino Spinelli,1,2,4 Alessandro Armuzzi1,2 1IBD Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; 2Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; 3Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; 4Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, ItalyCorrespondence: Alessandro Armuzzi, IBD Center, Humanitas Research Hospital – IRCCS, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Rozzano, Milan, Italy, Tel +39(0)282245555, Fax +39(0)282242591, Email alessandro.armuzzi@hunimed.euBackground and Aims: Patients affected by moderate-to-severe Ulcerative Colitis (UC) demand a challenging management. Small molecules, administrated as oral agents, have the ambition of overcoming the limitations of the biologic agents (ie, parenteral administration, rapidity of action, primary and secondary non-responsiveness). Beyond tofacitinib, a pan-Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor already approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe UC, novel more selective molecules like filgotinib are being currently evaluated in randomized clinical trials. We aimed to review the current evidence on filgotinib, a JAK-1 preferential inhibitor, in the treatment of UC and its place in therapy in the current scenario.Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were searched to identify relevant studies: those investigating the efficacy and safety of filgotinib in the treatment of UC patients were included in this narrative review.Results: The current preliminary data have shown that filgotinib is safe and effective in inducing clinical end endoscopic response in both biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients with moderate-to-severe UC, also with high inflammatory burden at baseline. In the SELECTION trial, one case of pulmonary embolism occurred with filgotinib 200 mg induction, and three venous thrombosis cases were observed in the placebo maintenance/LTE; the incidence of herpes zoster was ≤ 1% in all UC treated patients. Filgotinib represents an appealing treatment option for its high selectiveness, route of administration and rapidity of action; cost-effectiveness studies and head-to-head trials are needed to better define its place in therapy.Keywords: ulcerative colitis, filgotinib, Janus kinase inhibitors, efficacy, safety

Introduction: We conducted a post hoc analysis of efficacy and safety of filgotinib stratified by estimated radiographic progression rate before baseline (BL) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX; FINCH 1; NCT02889796) or were naïve to it (FINCH 3; NCT02886728). Methods: Radiographic progression rate was BL-Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) divided by RA duration (BL mTSS/year); estimated rapid radiographic progression (e-RRP) was BL change in mTSS/year ≥ 5; and estimated nonrapid radiographic progression (e-NRRP) was BL mTSS/year < 5. Efficacy and safety were compared between subgroups. All p-values are nominal. Results: In FINCH 1 and FINCH 3, 558/1755 (31.8%) and 787/1249 (63.0%) patients, respectively, had BL e-RRP. BL characteristics were generally similar between subgroups within each trial. At week (W) 24, in FINCH 1, proportions achieving a Disease Activity Score 28 for rheumatoid arthritis with C-reactive protein < 2.6 were significantly greater with filgotinib 200 (FIL200) and 100 mg (FIL100) versus placebo among e-RRP and e-NRRP subgroups. In each study, proportions of FIL-treated patients achieving Clinical Disease Activity Index ≤ 2.8 and Simple Disease Activity Index ≤ 3.3 were similar between subgroups. In FINCH 3, disease activity measures were at least numerically improved among patients receiving FIL versus MTX monotherapy. At W24, mTSS changes from BL (CFB) were greater among patients with e-RRP in FINCH 1 and FINCH 3 versus e-NRRP (0.81 versus 0.19, p = 0.001; 0.67 versus 0.25, p = 0.31, respectively). At W52, in FINCH 1, mTSS CFBs were smaller among e-RRP patients treated with FIL200 (0.40; p < 0.001) and FIL100 (0.77; p = 0.024) versus adalimumab (ADA; 1.46). In FINCH 3 at W52, mTSS CFBs were significantly smaller with FIL200 versus MTX among e-RRP patients. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were comparable between subgroups and across treatment arms. Conclusions: Patients with previous e-RRP who received standard care tended to progress radiographically. FIL200 demonstrated persistent, consistent benefit for disease activity control among e-RRP and e-NRRP subgroups, and AE profiles were similar between subgroups. Although filgotinib efficacy was somewhat reduced among patients with e-RRP, filgotinib treatment slowed radiographic progression in both subgroups. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02889796, NCT02886728. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This exploratory analysis of FINCH 1 (NCT02889796) examined filgotinib (FIL) efficacy and safety in a subgroup of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX; MTX-IR) who had four poor prognostic factors (PPFs). Methods: Patients with MTX-IR received placebo up to week (W)24 or FIL200 mg, FIL100 mg, or adalimumab up to W52; all received MTX. Efficacy and safety data were stratified by four PPFs versus fewer than four PPFs: seropositivity, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 6 mg/L, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with CRP > 5.1, and erosions on X-rays. Results: At baseline, 687/1755 patients had four PPFs. At W12, whether with four PPFs or fewer than four PPFs, response rates on all American College of Rheumatology (ACR) measures were significantly greater with FIL200 and FIL100 versus placebo. At W52, FIL200 ACR20/50/70 response rates remained at least numerically higher versus adalimumab in both subgroups. At W52, FIL200 reduced modified total Sharp score (mTSS) change versus adalimumab in patients with four or fewer than four PPFs. Conclusions: In high-risk (four PPFs) patients with MTX-IR RA, FIL200 and FIL100 showed similar reductions in disease activity versus placebo at W12 as in patients with fewer than four PPFs. mTSS in patients receiving FIL200 changed little from W24 to W52, while that in patients receiving FIL100 progressed comparably to patients who received adalimumab. Tolerability was comparable across treatment arms and subgroups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Global clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) often do not recruit enough patients from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds to identify any potential differences in treatment outcome across such groups. To overcome this limitation, using data from five previous clinical trials and two ongoing trial extensions, this study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of filgotinib in patients with RA across geographic regions. Methods: This was a post hoc, exploratory analysis of data from male and female patients with RA meeting the 2010 RA criteria as defined by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology. Data were analyzed from phase 2 (DARWIN 1–2) and phase 3 (FINCH 1–3) clinical trials, as well as two long-term extension studies (DARWIN 3, FINCH 4), of filgotinib. Efficacy endpoints included ACR 20%/50%/70% improvement (ACR20/50/70) responses, disease activity score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein [DAS28(CRP)], Clinical Disease Activity Index scores, Boolean remission, and change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Safety data were presented as exposure-adjusted incidence rates per 100 patient-years of exposure of treatment-emergent adverse events. Results: Compared with placebo, at week 12 a greater proportion of patients receiving filgotinib 200 mg (FIL200) or 100 mg (FIL100) achieved ACR20 (p < 0.01), with similar outcomes in most regions. Overall, the reduction in HAQ-DI with FIL200 or FIL100 was greater than with placebo (p < 0.05) at week 12. Compared with placebo, at week 24 the proportions of patients achieving DAS28(CRP) ≤ 3.2 were greater for both doses of FIL, as seen in most regions (p < 0.01). Safety outcomes did not indicate regional or ethnic differences in the safety profile of filgotinib. Conclusion: Filgotinib efficacy and safety in patients with RA were generally consistent across geographic regions. ClinicalTrials.gov Trial Registration Numbers: NCT02889796; NCT02873936; NCT02886728; NCT03025308; NCT01888874; NCT01894516; NCT02065700. Plain Language Summary: Clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis recruit too few patients from diverse ethnic backgrounds to be able to identify differences in treatment outcomes. In adults with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis who do not tolerate or have responded poorly to other advanced treatments, the Janus kinase inhibitor filgotinib can be used alone or in combination with the immunosuppressant methotrexate. Using data from 4695 patients with rheumatoid arthritis from five previous clinical trials and two ongoing trial extensions, this paper examined the efficacy and safety of filgotinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis across geographic locations worldwide. Patients were grouped by region: North America, South and Central America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, East Asia, South and Southeast Asia, and Other (South Africa, New Zealand, Australia, and Israel). The efficacy of filgotinib in treating the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis was assessed using several measures of disease activity, with changes in patient quality of life determined using a health assessment questionnaire. Safety data were reported as the rates of side effects experienced by patients. Across different geographic regions, no major differences in filgotinib treatment response were observed. Rheumatoid arthritis disease activity levels were consistently lower in patients receiving filgotinib than in patients receiving placebo. Across the regions examined, quality-of-life scores also improved to a greater degree in patients receiving filgotinib compared with placebo. The rates of side effects, including infections, were similar irrespective of region. The number of deaths was low, mostly resulting from cardiovascular events, infections, and malignancies. This study demonstrates that the efficacy and safety of filgotinib are consistent in patients with rheumatoid arthritis from a broad range of geographic regions and ethnic backgrounds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims Corticosteroid-free remission is an important treatment goal for patients with ulcerative colitis [UC]. The corticosteroid-sparing effects of filgotinib, an oral, Janus kinase 1 preferential inhibitor, were assessed in SELECTION, a placebo-controlled, phase 2b/3 trial in moderately to severely active UC. Methods These post hoc analyses assessed 1-, 3-, 6-, and 8-month rates of corticosteroid-free clinical remission at Week 58 and change in median daily prednisone-equivalent dose over time. A matching-adjusted indirect comparison [MAIC] of maintenance studies assessed corticosteroid-free remission with filgotinib 200 mg, intravenous vedolizumab, subcutaneous vedolizumab, and oral tofacitinib. Results The Maintenance Study full analysis set included 199 patients receiving filgotinib 200 mg and 98 receiving placebo. Among patients receiving corticosteroids at Maintenance Study baseline, at Week 58, 30.4%, 29.3%, 27.2%, and 21.7% receiving filgotinib had been in corticosteroid-free remission for ≥1, ≥3, ≥6, or ≥8 months, respectively, versus 6.4% receiving placebo across thresholds [ p  <0.05]. Median daily prednisone-equivalent dose decreased from 17.5 mg/day to 10.0 mg/day with filgotinib treatment during the Maintenance Study. Based upon the MAIC, filgotinib was associated with greater likelihood of corticosteroid-free clinical remission versus intravenous vedolizumab (odds ratio [OR], 15.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6–139.9; p  <0.05]) and similar odds to subcutaneous vedolizumab [OR, 3.8; CI, 0.2–63.8; p  = 0.36] in biologic-naïve patients, and similar odds to tofacitinib overall [OR, 2.0; 0.4–9.1; p  = 0.39]. Conclusions Filgotinib 200 mg demonstrated corticosteroid-sparing effects and maintained corticosteroid-free clinical remission in patients with UC. MAIC results should be interpreted cautiously given the large CIs and differences in study design and patient populations. [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02914522]. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) remains a challenge for rheumatologists and patients despite implementation of intensive treat-to-target strategies in shared decision with patients and an increasing availability of drugs. Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are a new generation of oral targeted drugs. Filgotinib preferentially inhibits JAK1 and is the latest JAKi to be approved for use in RA. This narrative review focuses on drug characteristics, efficacy, and safety of filgotinib in patients with RA, summarizing available literature. Trial data are detailed, put into perspective for practice and discussed in regulatory perspective. Preclinical studies demonstrate preferential inhibition of JAK1 and a promising pharmacokinetic profile with few drug-drug interactions. Increase in hemoglobin in line with preferential inhibition of JAK1 over JAK2 is seen in early-phase clinical trials. A phase III program demonstrates efficacy in several disease stages, numerically higher with 200 mg versus 100 mg daily. In the overall RA population such dose-related effect is not observed for safety except for herpes zoster and increases in lipids and creatine phosphokinase. This reassuring safety profile is to be confirmed in future practice. It also needs to be unraveled if JAK1 preferential inhibition plays a key role in this safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]