Abu-Sultaneh, Samer, Iyer, Narayan Prabhu, Fernández, Analía, Gaies, Michael, González-Dambrauskas, Sebastián, Hotz, Justin Christian, Kneyber, Martin CJ, López-Fernández, Yolanda M, Rotta, Alexandre T, Werho, David K, Baranwal, Arun Kumar, Blackwood, Bronagh, Craven, Hannah J, Curley, Martha AQ, Essouri, Sandrine, Fioretto, Jose Roberto, Hartmann, Silvia MM, Jouvet, Philippe, Korang, Steven Kwasi, Rafferty, Gerrard F, Ramnarayan, Padmanabhan, Rose, Louise, Tume, Lyvonne N, Whipple, Elizabeth C, Wong, Judith Ju Ming, Emeriaud, Guillaume, Mastropietro, Christopher W, Napolitano, Natalie, Newth, Christopher JL, Khemani, Robinder G, and Network, Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators
BackgroundCommon, operational definitions are crucial to assess interventions and outcomes related to pediatric mechanical ventilation. These definitions can reduce unnecessary variability among research and quality improvement efforts, to ensure findings are generalizable, and can be pooled to establish best practices.Research questionCan we establish operational definitions for key elements related to pediatric ventilator liberation using a combination of detailed literature review and consensus-based approaches?Study design and methodsA panel of 26 international experts in pediatric ventilator liberation, two methodologists, and two librarians conducted systematic reviews on eight topic areas related to pediatric ventilator liberation. Through a series of virtual meetings, we established draft definitions that were voted upon using an anonymous web-based process. Definitions were revised by incorporating extracted data gathered during the systematic review and discussed in another consensus meeting. A second round of voting was conducted to confirm the final definitions.ResultsIn eight topic areas identified by the experts, 16 preliminary definitions were established. Based on initial discussion and the first round of voting, modifications were suggested for 11 of the 16 definitions. There was significant variability in how these items were defined in the literature reviewed. The final round of voting achieved ≥ 80% agreement for all 16 definitions in the following areas: what constitutes respiratory support (invasive mechanical ventilation and noninvasive respiratory support), liberation and failed attempts to liberate from invasive mechanical ventilation, liberation from respiratory support, duration of noninvasive respiratory support, total duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, spontaneous breathing trials, extubation readiness testing, 28 ventilator-free days, and planned vs rescue use of post-extubation noninvasive respiratory support.InterpretationWe propose that these consensus-based definitions for elements of pediatric ventilator liberation, informed by evidence, be used for future quality improvement initiatives and research studies to improve generalizability and facilitate comparison.