Search

In cancer, a patient is considered a survivor from the time of initial diagnosis until the end of life. With improvements in early diagnosis and treatment, the number of cancer survivors (CS) has grown considerably and includes: (1) Patients cured and free from cancer who may be at risk of late-onset cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity (CTR-CVT); (2) Patients with long-term control of not-curable cancers in whom CTR-CVT may need to be addressed. This paper highlights the importance of the cancer care continuum, of a patient-centered approach and of a prevention-oriented policy. The ultimate goal is a personalized care of CS, achievable only through a multidisciplinary-guided survivorship care plan, one that replaces the fragmented management of current healthcare systems. Collaboration between oncologists and cardiologists is the pillar of a framework in which primary care providers and other specialists must be engaged and in which familial, social and environmental factors are also taken into account., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2023 Bisceglia, Canale, Silvestris, Gallucci, Camerini, Inno, Camilli, Turazza, Russo, Paccone, Mistrulli, De Luca, Di Fusco, Tarantini, Lucà, Oliva, Moreo, Maurea, Quagliariello, Ricciardi, Lestuzzi, Fiscella, Parrini, Racanelli, Russo, Incorvaia, Calabrò, Curigliano, Cinieri, Gulizia, Gabrielli, Oliva and Colivicchi.)

As cardio-oncology imposed itself as the reference specialty for a comprehensive cardiovascular approach to all patients with cancer, a more specific and careful cardiac evaluation of women entering their journey into cancer care is needed. Gender medicine refers to the study of how sex-based biological and gender-based socioeconomic and cultural differences influence people's health. Gender-related aspects could account for differences in the development, progression, and clinical signs of diseases as well as in the treatment of adverse events. Gender also accounts for major differences in access to healthcare. As for medicine and healthcare in general, gender-related characteristics have gained significance in cardio-oncology and should no longer be neglected in both clinical practice and research. We aimed to review the most relevant cardiovascular issues in women related to the cardio-oncology approach to offer a specific gender-related point of view for clinicians involved in the care process for both cancer and cardiovascular disease., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Canale, Bisceglia, Gallucci, Russo, Camerini, Di Fusco, Paccone, Camilli, Fiscella, Lestuzzi, Turazza, Gulizia, Pavan, Maurea, Gabrielli, Oliva and Colivicchi.)

Geriatric patients are an increasing population and cancer treatment in this population is a challenging and unsolved issue. Ageing is characterized by low-grade inflammation (inflamm-ageing), an important driver for age-related diseases such as cardiovascular diseases and cancer. These chronic conditions share pathophysiological bases, risk factors and may coexist. The burden of comorbidities lowers the threshold for cardiotoxic effects of oncologic treatments. Geriatric assessment is helpful in identifying the peculiar vulnerabilities of this complex population, but a multidisciplinary approach (with oncologists and cardio-oncologists) is needed to improve the appropriateness of care. In this ANMCO position paper, we define the role of cardio-oncologists in the different scenarios of older cancer patients (active cancer, long-term survivors), the importance of geriatric assessment, the unmet needs of survivors and the complexity of comorbidity management.

Background: The extent and quality of the involvement of cardiology units in health programs delivered by Italian centers for heart transplantation (HTx) have not been investigated previously., Methods: The Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists (ANMCO) and the Italian Society for Organ Transplantation (SITO) developed and delivered a nationwide survey to the Directors of the Italian centers for HTx to investigate the extent to which cardiology units contribute to HTx programs. The survey investigated: (i) the organization of the centers and institutional frame under which cardiology units contributed to HTx programs; (ii) the volumes of procedures and clinical services delivered by cardiology units to HTx centers for listing patients, following those waiting for HTx, managing acute heart failure, selecting and allocating organs to recipients, following and managing organ rejection after HTx., Results: Of the 14 Italian centers involved, 13 provided full responses to the survey. Between 2017-2019, on average, 46% of the respondents performed up to 15 HTx/year, and additional 46% performed between 16 and 30 HTx/year. Of the respondents, 62% were included in a department of cardiac Surgery which did not include a cardiology unit; furthermore, 54% declared not to be included in a formal network for heart failure management. Cardiology units were the source for referrals of candidates to HTx in 85% cases. Of the respondents, 15% declared to be able to provide cardiological services thorough intra-center multidisciplinary team including cardiologists, whereas cardiological services were outsourced in 61% of the respondents. The clinical follow-up of patients waiting for HTx was performed directly by surgeons in 38% of the respondents. Worsening heart failure was managed directly by the HTx center in 33% of the cases using dedicated beds. Post-HTx follow-up, including endomyocardial biopsy, involved external cardiology units in less than 25% of the centers., Conclusions: The ANMCO-SITO survey shows that in Italy a very wide variability exists in terms of organization of HTx centers and their relationships with cardiology units for delivering specific cardiological services and procedures. In large majority, patient referral to HTx centers is mediated by cardiology units, whereas HTx was rarely included in a structured cardiological network for heart failure management.

Device interrogation and management are time consuming, representing a relevant burden for pacing centers. In several situations, patients' management requires additional follow up visits. Remote Monitoring (RM) allows an optimal recall management and a rapid diagnosis of device or lead failure, without the need of additional in office visits. Further it allows a significant delay reduction between the adverse event and the reaction to the alarm, shortening the time needed to make a clinical decision. A role in risk-predicting patient-related outcomes has also been shown. RM permits detection of the arrhythmia from 1 to 5 months in advance compared to in-office visits. Importantly, by using specific algorithms with multiparametric analysis, RM has been studied as a potential instrument to identify early patients on risk of worsening HF using specific algorithms. Although the use of RM in HF setting remains controversial, it has been proposed to improve HF clinical outcomes and survival in clinical trials. In this sense, RM success could require a standardization of process within a management model, that may involve different health care professionals. In this review, we examine recent advances of RM providing an update of this tool through different clinical scenarios.

In the last decade, the introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in clinical practice has changed the therapeutic landscape in the prevention of thromboembolic events. Although NOACs compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have demonstrated a similar or slightly lower rate of major bleeding and a lower rate of intracranial or fatal bleeding, hemorrhaging still represents the main adverse effect of anticoagulant treatment. This review reports data on the rates of major bleeding with old and new oral anticoagulants. It analyses laboratory tests that can be used to assess the intensity of anticoagulation in patients treated with oral anticoagulants and discusses general measures to implement in managing major bleeding., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Even though vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been employed for >50 years, there is still some uncertainty about the best strategy to reverse anticoagulation due to VKAs in cases of major bleeding. Furthermore, there is also scarce evidence about the most appropriate way to treat serious bleeding associated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. This review analyses the main advantages and disadvantages of the various forthcoming therapeutic options to restore a normal coagulation status in anticoagulated patients with ongoing serious bleeding. It discusses the role of fresh frozen plasma, prothrombin complex concentrates and recombinant factor VII activated. Moreover, we report updated evidence on antidotes currently available or in development. Finally, this article proposes a comprehensive algorithm that summarizes major bleeding management during treatment with oral anticoagulants., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Multivessel spontaneous coronary artery dissection is a very rare cause of myocardial ischemia. Its optimal treatment is not yet well defined and is usually tailored to clinical features. We report a case of a postpartum woman with multivessel spontaneous coronary artery dissection and acute myocardial infarction, in whom the drug-eluting stenting of the only alleged 'culprit' vessel did not prevent the propagation of dissection from another vessel. Although the recommendations drawn from a single case report are not conclusive, we believe that when there is a multivessel spontaneous coronary artery dissection in a setting of acute myocardial infarction, all dissected coronary segments should be treated using stents.

Objectives: We sought to evaluate the safety and performance of the Janus Tacrolimus-Eluting stent (TES) in an unselected population of patients, without application of restrictive clinical or angiographic criteria., Background: Continued attention to the safety, efficacy, and deliverability of first-generation drug eluting stents has led to the development of new antiproliferative agents with alternative stent platforms and different drug carrier vehicles., Methods: The TEST (Tacrolimus Eluting STent) registry is a prospective, nonrandomized single-center registry in which 140 consecutive patients who underwent single- or multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention between February 2005 and August 2005 were enrolled., Results: The composite rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 22 months clinical follow-up was 40.9%. The rate of mortality, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were 5.5%, 11%, and 31.5%, respectively. Angiographic follow-up at 8 months was achieved in 74% of patients; binary restenosis occurred in 39.4% of lesions. Most restenosis lesions (94.6%) had a diffuse pattern, while focal restenosis was observed in 5.4% of cases. Definite or probable stent thrombosis was observed in 2.4% of patients., Conclusions: The present prospective, nonrandomized, TEST registry indicated high MACE and restenosis rates, and thereby rather discouraging long-term outcomes with use of the Janus TES in an unselected "real world" population of patients who underwent single- or multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention., ((c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

The optimal management of acute myocardial infarction in elderly people (>or= 75 years) is controversial because elderly patients have been excluded or are under-represented in most acute myocardial infarction trials. Randomized studies show that, also in the elderly, thrombolytic therapy is effective in reducing mortality after acute myocardial infarction but the benefit in terms of mortality, recurrent infarction and stroke is smaller compared to primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Among the available mechanical therapeutic strategies, stenting is found to be superior to balloon angioplasty, whereas the role of drug-eluting stents in this setting still remains to be evaluated. The standard use of intravenous unfractionated heparin is still recommended because of the increased risk of intracranial haemorrhage by a combination of low molecular weight heparin or IIb/IIIa inhibitors and thrombolytic agents. Dedicated randomized clinical trials are needed to establish the best reperfusion therapy for this expanding population, especially in patients admitted to hospitals without percutaneous coronary intervention facilities and in patients developing cardiogenic shock.