Search

Your search keyword '"Forgas, Joseph P."' showing total 431 results
Start Over Author "Forgas, Joseph P."
431 results on '"Forgas, Joseph P."'

1. Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists: A perspective and research agenda.

Author

Clark, Cory, Jussim, Lee, Frey, Komi, Stevens, Sean, Al-Gharbi, Musa, Aquino, Karl, Bailey, J, Barbaro, Nicole, Baumeister, Roy, Bleske-Rechek, April, Buss, David, Ceci, Stephen, Del Giudice, Marco, Ditto, Peter, Forgas, Joseph, Geary, David, Geher, Glenn, Haider, Sarah, Honeycutt, Nathan, Joshi, Hrishikesh, Krylov, Anna, Loury, Glenn, Lu, Louise, Macy, Michael, Martin, Chris, McWhorter, John, Miller, Geoffrey, Paresky, Pamela, Pinker, Steven, Reilly, Wilfred, Salmon, Catherine, Stewart-Williams, Steve, Tetlock, Philip, Williams, Wendy, Wilson, Anne, Winegard, Bo, Yancey, George, von Hippel, William, and Loftus, Elizabeth

Subjects
academic freedom, censorship, organizational behavior, science reform, transparency, Costs and Cost Analysis, Censorship, Research, Science, Social Responsibility
Abstract

Science is among humanitys greatest achievements, yet scientific censorship is rarely studied empirically. We explore the social, psychological, and institutional causes and consequences of scientific censorship (defined as actions aimed at obstructing particular scientific ideas from reaching an audience for reasons other than low scientific quality). Popular narratives suggest that scientific censorship is driven by authoritarian officials with dark motives, such as dogmatism and intolerance. Our analysis suggests that scientific censorship is often driven by scientists, who are primarily motivated by self-protection, benevolence toward peer scholars, and prosocial concerns for the well-being of human social groups. This perspective helps explain both recent findings on scientific censorship and recent changes to scientific institutions, such as the use of harm-based criteria to evaluate research. We discuss unknowns surrounding the consequences of censorship and provide recommendations for improving transparency and accountability in scientific decision-making to enable the exploration of these unknowns. The benefits of censorship may sometimes outweigh costs. However, until costs and benefits are examined empirically, scholars on opposing sides of ongoing debates are left to quarrel based on competing values, assumptions, and intuitions.

Published
2023

26. List of Contributors

Author

Aday, Jacob, primary, Atkinson, Robert K., additional, Baydogan, Mustafa, additional, Beavers, Anthony F., additional, Beer, Jenay M., additional, Bosse, Tibor, additional, Burleson, Winslow, additional, Calvo, Rafael A., additional, Carlson, Joshua M., additional, Cavallaro, Andrea, additional, Chavez-Echeagaray, Maria Elena, additional, Cherry, David, additional, Daily, Shaundra B., additional, Darnell, Shelby S., additional, Demirbilek, Oya, additional, Fairclough, Stephen H., additional, Fishwick, Paul A., additional, Forgas, Joseph P., additional, Gaggioli, Andrea, additional, Gonzalez-Sanchez, Javier, additional, Gunes, Hatice, additional, Hancock, Peter A., additional, Hanington, Bruce, additional, Hudlicka, Eva, additional, Isaac, Joseph, additional, James, Melva T., additional, Jeon, Myounghoon, additional, Liles, Karina R., additional, Maryam Fakhrhosseini, Seyedeh, additional, Oron-Gilad, Tal, additional, Pakala, Sujan, additional, Peters, Dorian, additional, Porter, John J., additional, Riener, Andreas, additional, Riva, Giuseppe, additional, Rizer, Will, additional, Roy, Tania, additional, Russell, James A., additional, Sariyanidi, Evangelos, additional, Slattery, Justin P., additional, Wu, Xian, additional, and Yamanaka, Toshimasa, additional

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

44. Subjective status and perceived legitimacy across countries

Author

Brandt, Mark J., Kuppens, Toon, Spears, Russell, Andrighetto, Luca, Autin, Frederique, Babincak, Peter, Badea, Constantina, Bae, Jaechang, Batruch, Anatolia, Becker, Julia C., Bocian, Konrad, Bodroža, Bojana, Bourguignon, David, Bukowski, Marcin, Butera, Fabrizio, Butler, Sarah E., Chryssochoou, Xenia, Conway, Paul, Crawford, Jarret T., Croizet, Jean Claude, de Lemus, Soledad, Degner, Juliane, Dragon, Piotr, Durante, Federica, Easterbrook, Matthew J., Essien, Iniobong, Forgas, Joseph P., González, Roberto, Graf, Sylvie, Halama, Peter, Han, Gyuseog, Hong, Ryan Y., Houdek, Petr, Igou, Eric R., Inbar, Yoel, Jetten, Jolanda, Jimenez Leal, William, Jiménez-Moya, Gloria, Karunagharan, Jaya Kumar, Kende, Anna, Korzh, Maria, Laham, Simon M., Lammers, Joris, Lim, Li, Manstead, Antony S.R., Međedović, Janko, Melton, Zachary J., Motyl, Matt, Ntani, Spyridoula, Owuamalam, Chuma Kevin, Peker, Müjde, Platow, Michael J., Prims, J. P., Reyna, Christine, Rubin, Mark, Saab, Rim, Sankaran, Sindhuja, Shepherd, Lee, Sibley, Chris G., Sobkow, Agata, Spruyt, Bram, Stroebaek, Pernille, Sümer, Nebi, Sweetman, Joseph, Teixeira, Catia P., Toma, Claudia, Ujhelyi, Adrienn, van der Toorn, Jojanneke, van Hiel, Alain, Vásquez-Echeverría, Alejandro, Vazquez, Alexandra, Vianello, Michelangelo, Vranka, Marek, Yzerbyt, Vincent, Zimmerman, Jennifer L., Leerstoel Ellemers, Social identity: Morality and diversity, Center for Intercultural and Indigenous Research, ERC, Tilburg University [Netherlands], University of Groningen [Groningen], Universita degli studi di Genova, Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage (CeRCA), Université de Poitiers-Université de Tours (UT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), University of Presov, Université Paris Nanterre - UFR Sciences psychologiques et sciences de l'éducation (UPN SPSE), Université Paris Nanterre (UPN), Gwangju Welfare Foundation, Université de Lausanne (UNIL), University of Osnabrueck, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Partenaires INRAE, University of Novi Sad, Psychologie Ergonomique et Sociale pour l'Expérience utilisateurs (PErSEUs), Université de Lorraine (UL), Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie = Jagiellonian University (UJ), College of DuPage, Panteion University [Athens], The College of New Jersey (TCNJ), Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive (LAPSCO), Université Clermont Auvergne [2017-2020] (UCA [2017-2020])-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), University of Granada [Granada], University of Hamburg, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca [Milano] (UNIMIB), University of Sussex, FernUniversität in Hagen, University of New South Wales [Sydney] (UNSW), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (UC), Czech Academy of Sciences [Prague] (CAS), Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS), Chonnam National University [Gwangju], National University of Singapore (NUS), University of Economics [Prague], University of Limerick (UL), University of Toronto, University of Queensland [Brisbane], Universidad de los Andes [Bogota] (UNIANDES), University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE), Ural State Law University, University of Melbourne, University of Cologne, Cardiff University, Institute of Criminological and Sociological Research, Belgrade, Serbia, University of Illinois [Chicago] (UIC), University of Illinois System, MEF University [Istanbul], Australian National University (ANU), DePaul University [Chicago], University of Newcastle [Australia] (UoN), American University of Beirut [Beyrouth] (AUB), University of Warsaw (UW), University of Northumbria at Newcastle [United Kingdom], University of Auckland [Auckland], Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), University of Copenhagen = Københavns Universitet (KU), Sabanci University [Istanbul], University of Exeter, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Utrecht University [Utrecht], Leiden University, Universiteit Gent = Ghent University [Belgium] (UGENT), Universidad de la República [Montevideo] (UDELAR), Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Universita degli Studi di Padova, Charles University [Prague] (CU), Université Catholique de Louvain = Catholic University of Louvain (UCL), Universidad de la República [Montevideo] (UCUR), UCL - SSH/IPSY - Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Department of Social Psychology, Università degli studi di Genova = University of Genoa (UniGe), University of Prešov, Université de Lausanne = University of Lausanne (UNIL), SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities (SWPS), Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Universidad de Granada = University of Granada (UGR), Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca = University of Milano-Bicocca (UNIMIB), Prague University of Economics and Business (VSE), University of Newcastle [Callaghan, Australia] (UoN), University of Copenhagen = Københavns Universitet (UCPH), Universiteit Leiden, Universiteit Gent = Ghent University (UGENT), Università degli Studi di Padova = University of Padua (Unipd), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Tours-Université de Poitiers, Peker, Müjde, Sociology, Brussels Interdisciplinary Research centre on Migration and Minorities, Leerstoel Ellemers, Social identity: Morality and diversity, Social Psychology, Brandt, M, Kuppens, T, Spears, R, Andrighetto, L, Autin, F, Babincak, P, Badea, C, Bae, J, Batruch, A, Becker, J, Bocian, K, Bodroža, B, Bourguignon, D, Bukowski, M, Butera, F, Butler, S, Chryssochoou, X, Conway, P, Crawford, J, Croizet, J, de Lemus, S, Degner, J, Dragon, P, Durante, F, Easterbrook, M, Essien, I, Forgas, J, González, R, Graf, S, Halama, P, Han, G, Hong, R, Houdek, P, Igou, E, Inbar, Y, Jetten, J, Jimenez Leal, W, Jiménez‐moya, G, Kumar Karunagharan, J, Kende, A, Korzh, M, Laham, S, Lammers, J, Lim, L, Manstead, A, Međedović, J, Melton, Z, Motyl, M, Ntani, S, Kevin Owuamalam, C, Peker, M, Platow, M, Prims, J, Reyna, C, Rubin, M, Saab, R, Sankaran, S, Shepherd, L, Sibley, C, Sobkow, A, Spruyt, B, Stroebaek, P, Sümer, N, Sweetman, J, Teixeira, C, Toma, C, Ujhelyi, A, van der Toorn, J, van Hiel, A, Vásquez‐ Echeverría, A, Vazquez, A, Vianello, M, Vranka, M, Yzerbyt, V, and Zimmerman, J

Subjects
CONTROL, Social psychology (sociology), H Social Sciences (General), COMPENSATORY, STRATEGIES, Psychologie sociale, Social Psychology, media_common.quotation_subject, SELF-ESTEEM, L300, MODELS, POWER, Social Sciences, [SHS.PSY]Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology, legitimacy, 050109 social psychology, UNCERTAINTY, 050105 experimental psychology, SYSTEM-JUSTIFICATION THEORY, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, 10. No inequality, Social identity theory, Research Articles, Legitimacy, COMPENSATORY CONTROL, status, M-PSI/05 - PSICOLOGIA SOCIALE, media_common, social identity, system justification, HYPOTHESIS, STABILITY, Dynamique des groupes, 05 social sciences, Self-esteem, Social mobility, Moderation, C800, status, legitimacy, social identity, system justification, Psychology, System justification, INEQUALITY, Social psychology, Research Article, Social status
Abstract

The relationships between subjective status and perceived legitimacy are important for understanding the extent to which people with low status are complicit in their oppression. We use novel data from 66 samples and 30 countries (N = 12,788) and find that people with higher status see the social system as more legitimate than those with lower status, but there is variation across people and countries. The association between subjective status and perceived legitimacy was never negative at any levels of eight moderator variables, although the positive association was sometimes reduced. Although not always consistent with hypotheses, group identification, selfesteem, and beliefs in social mobility were all associated with perceived legitimacy among people who have low subjective status. These findings enrich our understanding of the relationship between social status and legitimacy., Center for Intercultural and Indigenous Research 15110006, H2020 European Research Council 759320, Center for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies 15130009, Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (CONICYT) CONICYT FONDECYT 1161371, Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness PSI2016-79971-P, Grant Agency of the Czech Republic 20-01214S, Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences RVO: 68081740

Published
2020

45. The evolutionary mismatch hypothesis: Implications for applied social psychology

Author

Van Vugt, Mark, De Vries, Lianne P., Li, Norman P., Forgas, Joseph P., Crano, William D., Fiedler, Klaus, Organizational Psychology, IBBA, and Biological Psychology

Abstract

Evolutionary mismatch is an important concept in evolutionary social psychology and may play a significant role in accounting for numerous maladaptive choice preferences of humans living in evolutionary novel environments. Here we review evidence in support of mismatched preferences in the context of romantic relationships, work settings, politics, and healthy and sustainable lifestyles. In developing interventions to change mismatched preferences (e.g., via nudges or incentives), it is crucial to consider the constraints and opportunities of our evolved psychology.

Published
2020

46. The use of computer-mediated interaction in exploring affective influences on strategic interpersonal behaviours

Author

Forgas, Joseph P., East, Rebekah, and Chan, Norman Y.M.

Subjects
Computers, Psychology and mental health, Sociology and social work
Abstract

To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.010 Byline: Joseph P. Forgas, Rebekah East, Norman Y.M. Chan Keywords: Affect; Interpersonal behavior; Computer-mediated interaction; Affect and cognition Abstract: What role can computers play in the study of strategic interpersonal behaviours, and research on affective influences on social behaviour in particular? Despite intense recent interest in affective phenomena, the role of affect in social interaction has rarely been studied. This paper reviews past work on affective influences on interpersonal behaviour, with special emphasis on Michael Argyle's pioneering studies in this field. We then discuss historical and contemporary theories of affective influences on social behaviour. A series of experiments using computer-mediated interaction tasks are described, investigating affective influences on interpersonal behaviours such as self-disclosure strategies and the production of persuasive arguments. It is suggested that computer-mediated interaction offers a reliable and valid technique for studying the cognitive, information processing variables that facilitate or inhibit affective influences on interpersonal behaviour. These studies show that mild affective states produce significant differences in the way people perform in interpersonal situations, and can accentuate or attenuate (through affective priming) self-disclosure intimacy or persuasive argument quality. The implications of these studies for recent theories and affect-cognition models, and for our understanding of people's everyday interpersonal strategies are discussed. Author Affiliation: School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia

Published
2007

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results