Search

When performing a maternal transport between two facilities, numerous pieces of information must be communicated between physicians, nurses, and transport personnel, including the health status of 2 patients (mother and fetus), availability of bed space and personnel in 2 units at the receiving facility (labor and delivery unit and neonatal intensive care unit), arrangements for transportation, and inpatient and outpatient records. The amount and complexity of information creates a risk of medical error due to communication lapses. A cognitive aid such as a standardized form can help the team prepare for a transfer and provide a consistent framework for a handoff briefing among healthcare professionals. SMFM presents a sample briefing form to ensure that key elements are communicated for every maternal transport. Practical suggestions are given to help facilities customize the form and implement it on their units.

Objective: To create the first structured surgical report form for NBL with international consensus, to permit standardized documentation of all NBL-related surgical procedures and their outcomes. Summary of Background Data: NBL, the most common extracranial solid malignant tumor in children, covers a wide spectrum of tumors with significant differences in anatomical localization, organ or vessel involvement, and tumor biology. Complete surgical resection of the primary tumor is an important part of NBL treatment, but maybe hazardous, prone to complications and its role in high-risk disease remains debated. Various surgical guidelines exist within the protocols of the different cooperative groups, although there is no standardized operative report form to document the surgical treatment of NBL. Methods: After analyzing the treatment protocols of the SIOP Europe International Neuroblastoma Study Group, Children's Oncology Group, and Gesellschaft fuer Paediatrische Onkologie und Haematologie – German Association of Pediatric Oncology and Haematology pediatric cooperative groups, important variables were defined to completely describe surgical biopsy and resection of NBL and their outcomes. All variables were discussed within the Surgical Committees of SIOP Europe International Neuroblastoma Study Group, Children's Oncology Group, and Gesellschaft fuer Paediatrische Onkologie und Haematologie – German Association of Pediatric Oncology and Haematology. Thereafter, joint meetings were organized to obtain intercontinental consensus. Results: The “International Neuroblastoma Surgical Report Form” provides a structured reporting tool for all NBL surgery, in every anatomical region, documenting all Image Defined Risk Factors and structures involved, with obligatory reporting of intraoperative and 30 day-postoperative complications. Conclusion: The International Neuroblastoma Surgical Report Form is the first universal form for the structured and uniform reporting of NBL-related surgical procedures and their outcomes, aiming to facilitate the postoperative communication, treatment planning and analysis of surgical treatment of NBL.

Context.—Tumor reporting constitutes a significant daily task of pathologists. An efficient tumor-reporting methodology is thus vitally important. The Web dynamic form (WbDF) method offers a multitude of advantages over the prevailing transcription-mediated reporting method based on static-text checklists. However, its adaptation has been severely hampered for 2 decades by its costly needs to maintain a complex back-end system and to change the system for frequent updates of reporting content.Objective.—To overcome these 2 obstacles with a serverless Web platform that enables users to create, customize, use, and download WbDFs as synoptic templates for structured tumor reporting.Design.—Deploy ReactJS as a Web platform. Create form components in JavaScript Object Notation files. Use JavaScript Object Notation files to make WbDFs on the Web platform. Use the WbDFs to generate final pathology reports.Results.—Ordinary users (pathologists) can create/customize reporting templates as WbDFs on the Web platform. The WbDF can be used to make a pathology report and stored/shared like ordinary document files. There is no back-end system to change, nor a requirement for computer programming skills.Conclusions.—This strategy eliminates the need for a complex back-end system and the associated cost when updating tumor-reporting standards, making it possible to adopt the WbDF method without the technological drawbacks associated with content updates. It also opens a new field of how the tumor-reporting system should be organized, updated, and implemented.

Objective We explore factors that may have contributed to differences in treatment-emergent adverse events in the phase 2 and phase 3 lasmiditan clinical trials. Background Phase 2 and phase 3 trials showed that the centrally penetrant 5-HT1F agonist, lasmiditan, was effective; higher frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs) were seen in phase 2. Methods This work represents a hybrid of a review of primary documents and study reports with additional post hoc analyses. Protocols, informed consents, data collection forms, and methodologies were reviewed. This information was supplemented by results from the clinical study reports and post hoc analyses of individual patient data from each trial. Results For lasmiditan 100 and 200 mg, in phase 2, the incidence of ≥1 AE was 72-86% (26% severe), while in phase 3 was 36-43% (2% severe). The most common AEs in all studies were CNS-related. The phase 2 consent form was more descriptive of AEs than phase 3. In phase 2, patients recorded AEs and severity in a paper diary that warned about drowsiness and dizziness. In phase 3, patients recorded in electronic diaries whether they experienced unusual feelings after dosing with lasmiditan that they had not felt with a migraine before, and were contacted to determine if an AE had occurred. In phase 2, the AE Schwindel was variably translated from German as "vertigo" or "dizziness," while phase 3 vertigo cases were queried to ensure there was a sensation of rotation or movement. History of recurrent dizziness and/or vertigo was exclusionary in phase 3. Conclusions This work illustrates how informed consent wording, AE collection methods, translation, exclusion criteria, and other factors may be important determinants for reporting of the frequency and severity of AEs in clinical trials.

The development of treatments for heart failure (HF) is challenged by burdensome clinical trials. Reducing the need for extensive data collection and increasing opportunities for data compatibility between trials may improve efficiency and reduce resource burden. The Heart Failure Collaboratory (HFC) multi-stakeholder consortium sought to create a lean case report form (CRF) for use in HF clinical trials evaluating cardiac devices. The HFC convened patients, clinicians, clinical researchers, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), payers, industry partners, and statisticians to create a consensus core CRF. Eight recent clinical trial CRFs for the treatment of HF from 6 industry partners were analyzed. All CRF elements were systematically reviewed. Those elements deemed critical for data collection in HF clinical trials were used to construct the final, harmonized CRF. The original CRFs included 176 distinct data items covering demographics, vital signs, physical examination, medical history, laboratory and imaging testing, device therapy, medications, functional and quality of life assessment, and outcome events. The resulting, minimally inclusive CRF device contains 75 baseline data items and 6 events, with separate modular additions that can be used depending on the additional detail required for a particular intervention. The consensus electronic form is now freely available for use in clinical trials. Creation of a core CRF is important to improve clinical trial efficiency in HF device development in the United States. This living document intends to reduce clinical trial administrative burden, increase evidence integrity, and improve comparability of clinical data between trials.

Point-of-care ultrasonography is a key skill for the critical care clinician and is gaining widespread acceptance by clinicians in all areas of medicine. In addition to mastery of image acquisition, image interpretation, and clinical application, intensivists need to be adept with billing for their scanning activity. This article summarizes the requirements for documentation and image storage that must be met to obtain reimbursement for point-of-care ultrasonography services.

Background Monitoring and managing data returns in multi-centre randomised controlled trials is an important aspect of trial management. Maintaining consistently high data return rates has various benefits for trials, including enhancing oversight, improving reliability of central monitoring techniques and helping prepare for database lock and trial analyses. Despite this, there is little evidence to support best practice, and current standard methods may not be optimal. Methods We report novel methods from the Trial of Imaging and Schedule in Seminoma Testis (TRISST), a UK-based, multi-centre, phase III trial using paper Case Report Forms to collect data over a 6-year follow-up period for 669 patients. Using an automated database report which summarises the data return rate overall and per centre, we developed a Microsoft Excel-based tool to allow observation of per-centre trends in data return rate over time. The tool allowed us to distinguish between forms that can and cannot be completed retrospectively, to inform understanding of issues at individual centres. We reviewed these statistics at regular trials unit team meetings. We notified centres whose data return rate appeared to be falling, even if they had not yet crossed the pre-defined acceptability threshold of an 80% data return rate. We developed a set method for agreeing targets for gradual improvement with centres having persistent data return problems. We formalised a detailed escalation policy to manage centres who failed to meet agreed targets. We conducted a post-hoc, descriptive analysis of the effectiveness of the new processes. Results The new processes were used from April 2015 to September 2016. By May 2016, data return rates were higher than they had been at any time previously, and there were no centres with return rates below 80%, which had never been the case before. In total, 10 centres out of 35 were contacted regarding falling data return rates. Six out of these 10 showed improved rates within 6–8 weeks, and the remainder within 4 months. Conclusions Our results constitute preliminary effectiveness evidence for novel methods in monitoring and managing data return rates in randomised controlled trials. We encourage other researchers to work on generating better evidence-based methods in this area, whether through more robust evaluation of our methods or of others.

We review some of the recent literature on consent for surgical procedures and suggest a scheme for obtaining surgical consent.

To evaluate the agreement between intensive care physicians with similar training in the use of bedside lung ultrasonography in identifying pulmonary B lines, visualized in real time, to verify the reproducibility of the method.A total of 67 patients with some ventilatory deterioration identified within 12 hours after a pulmonary ultrasonography in the period from November 2016 to March 2017 were analyzed, and all were admitted to an intensive care unit of a private hospital in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais. The lung ultrasonographies were performed by three different professionals, termed A, B and C, and the time interval between each lung ultrasonography was less than 3 hours. The only visualized chest zones were the anterior and lateral, defined as right and left anterior (1) zones (Z1R and Z1L, respectively), which were delimited by the clavicle, the sternum and the horizontal line perpendicular to the xiphoid process and anterior axillary line. The right and left lateral (2) zones (Z2R and Z2L, respectively) covered the lateral area between the anterior and posterior axillary lines, with the lower limit being the same horizontal line corresponding to the height of the xiphoid process. A lung zone was considered positive for B lines upon visualization of three or more of these lines, suggesting the presence of alveolar-interstitial syndrome. Using the Kappa value, we evaluated the agreement among the four zones according to the execution of each pair of professionals (AB, AC and BC).Approximately 80% of the areas that were visualized showed a moderate to substantial agreement, with the Kappa values ranging from 0.41 - 079 (p0.05; 95% CI). The highest levels of agreement occurred in the upper zones Z1R and Z1L between subgroups AC and BC, with a Kappa of approximately 0.65 (p0.001). In turn, Z2L showed one of the lowest agreements, with a Kappa of 0.36.The possible limitation of an examiner-dependent effect on lung ultrasounds was not found in this study, suggesting the good reproducibility of this diagnostic modality at the bedside.Avaliar a concordância entre médicos intensivistas que receberam treinamento semelhante para utilização do ultrassom pulmonar à beira do leito, na identificação das linhas B pulmonares visualizadas em tempo real, a fim de verificar a reprodutibilidade do método.Foram analisados 67 pacientes que apresentaram alguma piora ventilatória identificada nas últimas 12 horas da realização do ultrassom pulmonar, no período de novembro de 2016 a março de 2017, estando todos internados em um centro de terapia intensiva de um hospital privado de Belo Horizonte (MG). Os ultrassons pulmonares foram realizados por três profissionais diferentes, denominados A, B e C, sendo o intervalo de tempo entre cada ultrassom pulmonar menor que 3 horas. As zonas torácicas visualizadas foram apenas as anteriores e laterais, sendo definidas como zonas anteriores (1) direita e esquerda (Z1D e Z1E, respectivamente), delimitadas pela clavícula, esterno, linha horizontal perpendicular ao processo xifoide e linha axilar anterior; e zonas laterais (2) direita e esquerda (Z2D e Z2E, respectivamente), abrangendo a área entre linha axilar anterior e posterior lateralmente, tendo como limite inferior a mesma linha horizontal correspondente à altura do processo xifoide. Uma zona pulmonar era considerada positiva para linhas B, quando houvesse visualização de três ou mais dessas linhas, caracterizando possível síndrome interstício-alveolar. Por meio do valor Kappa, avaliamos a concordância dentre as quatro zonas, conforme execução de cada dupla de profissional (AB, AC e BC).Cerca de 80% das áreas visualizadas tiveram concordância classificada como moderada a substancial, com Kappa variando de 0,41 - 079 (p0,05; IC95%). Os maiores graus de concordância ocorreram nas zonas superiores Z1D e Z1E entre os subgrupos AC e BC, com Kappa em torno de 0,65 (p0,001). Já a Z2E apresentou uma das menores concordâncias, com Kappa de 0,36.A possível limitação do ultrassom pulmonar quanto ao efeito examinador-dependente não se mostrou presente neste trabalho, sugerindo boa reprodutibilidade dessa modalidade diagnóstica à beira do leito.

Introduction The gender landscape is changing. For professionals in health care, particularly diagnostic imaging (DI), we need better communication tools to obtain personal information from this gender diverse community. We need more specific information from patients because we are performing examinations in which radiation is involved. It is our professional duty to protect a patient's reproductive organs whenever possible, but we must know where those organs are located. In addition, we must determine if a patient could be pregnant or not. Compliance to the professional duty must also extend to transgender and nonbinary patients. Transgender patients do not express or identify the same as their sex assigned at birth; therefore, we may shield inappropriately and expose their reproductive organs unintentionally. Nonbinary patients do not identify as either male or female, and therefore, their expression does not indicate reproductive organ location. Method There are currently no specific forms in DI that ask the questions we need to know to protect the public from unnecessary radiation exposure to reproductive organs. In developing the new form, we began looking at current practices in DI departments to better understand where the communication gap was and what important information would be required in the new form. Result The authors have created a new intake form that accommodates all patients—regardless of age or gender. The result is the SIGE (Sex, Identity, Gender, Expression) form. Disscussion The SIGE form is inclusive and asks the necessary questions medical radiation technologists need to know in a respectful and professional manner so that we can shield gonadal tissue from ionizing radiation. In addition, the intention of the form is to help the gender diverse community to feel safe and respected in our department.

Objective To evaluate the case report forms and times elapsed between the surveillance steps for dengue virus (DENV) infection in a large Colombian city before the emergence of other arbovirus epidemics. Materials and Methods The descriptive epidemiology of DENV infection cases was analyzed from 2009 to 2013. The completeness of the case report forms filed at the Primary Units of Data Generation (PUDG) were evaluated, as well as the accuracy and suitability of the tests (PPV: positive predictive value). The average time-lags between each step were then calculated. Results There were 7.3, 12.38, 4.66, 6.25 and 29.9 annual cases of dengue infection per 10 000 inhabitants in 2009 to 2013, respectively. In this study, only 57.76% of the cases were classified correctly by the physicians and 26.32% of them were questioned about their home conditions and whether their family/friends had similar symptoms. Patients visited a clinic/hospital on average 4.76 days after developing symptoms and the health system was notified on average 1.75 days later, while 70.6% of them were reported within the one-day target period. There were only minor changes in case reporting times even during a DENV epidemic. Some (12.85%) of the case forms were later modified (average 16.7 days). In the period 2009-2013, the IgM confirmed PPV was 58.60%, while 20 mandatory criteria were absent on more than 25% of the forms. Conclusions The system was accurate, simple, flexible, stable and acceptable, but a number of ways are suggested to improve this case detection and reporting system. RESUMEN Objetivo Evaluar los formularios de informe de casos y los tiempos entre los pasos de vigilancia para el dengue en una ciudad colombiana antes de la aparición de otras epidemias de arbovirus. Materiales y Métodos Se analizó la epidemiología descriptiva entre 2009 y 2013. Se evaluó la integridad de los formularios de informes de casos, registrados en las Unidades Primarias de Generación de Datos, así como el valor predictivo (VPP) de las pruebas diagnósticas. Se calcularon los intervalos de tiempo promedio entre cada paso de la vigilancia. Resultados Hubo 7.3, 12.38, 4.66, 6.25 y 29.9 casos anuales por cada 10 000 habitantes en 2009-2013, respectivamente. Solo el 57.76% de los casos fueron clasificados correctamente por los médicos, el 26.32% de ellos fueron interrogados sobre las condiciones de su hogar y si sus familiares/amigos tenían síntomas similares. Los pacientes se presentaron a una clínica/hospital en promedio 4.76 días después de desarrollar síntomas y el sistema de salud fue notificado en promedio 1.75 días más tarde, mientras que el 70.6% de ellos se informaron dentro del período objetivo de un día. Algunos (12.85%) de los formularios de casos se modificaron posteriormente (promedio de 16.7 días). Desde 2009-2013, el VPP confirmado por IgM fue de 58.60%, mientras que veinte criterios obligatorios estuvieron ausentes en más del 25% de los formularios. Conclusiones El sistema fue preciso, simple, flexible, estable y aceptable, pero sugerimos varias formas de mejorar este sistema de detección e informe de casos.

Purpose Six forms relating to decisions on life-sustaining treatment (LST) for patients at the end-of-life (EOL) in hospital are required by the “Act on Decision of LST for Patients at the EOL.” We investigated the preparation and creation status of these documents from the database of the National Agency for Management of LST.Materials and Methods We analyzed the contents and details of each document necessary for decisions on LST, and the creation status of forms. We defined patients completing form 1 as “self-determined” of LST, and those whose family members had completed form 11/12 as “family decision” of LST. According to the determination subject, we compared the four items of LST on form 13 (the paper of implementation of LST) and the documentation time interval between forms.Results The six forms require information about the patient, doctor, specialized doctor, family members, institution, decision for LST, and intention to use hospice services. Of 44,381 who had completed at least one document, 36,693 patients had form 13. Among them, 11,531, 10,976, and 12,551 people completed forms 1, 11, and 12, respectively. The documentation time interval from forms 1, 11, or 12 to form 13 was 8.6±13.6 days, 1.0±9.5 days, and 1.5±9.7 days, respectively.Conclusion The self-determination rate of LST was 31% and the mean time interval from self-determination to implementation of LST was 8.6 days. The creation of these forms still takes place when the patients are close to death.

BackgroundSF-36 is a popular questionnaire for measuring self-perception of quality of life in a given population of interest. Surprisingly, no study compared score values issued from a telephone interview versus an internet-based questionnaire self-completion.MethodsPatients having an Internet connection and returning home after hospital discharge were enrolled in the SENTIPAT multicenter randomized trial the day of discharge. They were randomized to either self-complete a set of questionnaires using a dedicated website (I group) or to provide answers to the same questionnaires administered during a telephone interview (T group). This ancillary study of the trial compared SF-36 data relating to the post-hospitalization period in these two groups. In order to anticipate potential unbalanced characteristics of the respondents in the two groups, the impact of the mode of administration of the questionnaire on score differences was investigated using a matched sample of individuals originating from I and T groups (ratio 1:1), the matching procedure being based on a propensity score approach. SF-36 scores observed in I and T groups were compared with a Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, the score differences between the two groups were also examined according to Cohen’s effect size.ResultsThere were 245/840 (29%) and 630/840 (75%) SF-36 questionnaires completed in the I and T group, respectively (p < 0.001). Globally, score differences between groups before matching were similar to those observed in the matched sample. Mean scores observed in T group were all above the corresponding values observed in the I group. After matching, score differences in six out of the eight SF-36 scales were statistically significant, with a mean difference greater than 5 for four scales and an associated mild effect size ranging from 0.22 to 0.29, and with a mean difference near this threshold for two other scales (4.57 and 4.56) and a low corresponding effect size (0.18 and 0.16, respectively).ConclusionsTelephone mode of administration of SF-36 involved an interviewer effect increasing SF-36 scores. Questionnaire self-completion via the Internet should be preferred and surveys combining various administration methods should be avoided.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.govNCT01769261, registered January 16, 2013.

Introduction:despite the adoption of mental disorders act in 1972, the use of required mental health care act (MHCA) forms during admission of patients with mental illnesses remained below the legal expectation in the Maun District Hospital. This study audited Letsholathebe II Memorial Hospital (LIIMH) professionals´ usage of MHCA forms. Methods:this was a quasi-experimental study that audited files of patients admitted with mental illnesses, before, three and six months after a continuing medical education (CME). Cochran Q, McNemar symmetry Chi-square were used for comparison of performance. Results:of the 239 eligible files, we accessed 235 (98.3%). About two in ten (n=36/235, 15.3%) MHCA forms were not used in combination with required forms. The quasi-majority of MHCA forms set used, aligned with involuntary admission (n=134/137, 97.8%). Required admission MHCA forms significantly increased from nil before continuing medical education (CME-0), to 64.6% (n=51/79) at CME-3 and 77% (n=59/77) at CME-6 (p

Burn injuries are an extreme form of traumatic injury and are a global health issue. The Israeli National Burn Unit at the Sheba Medical Center, a tertiary level 1 trauma center and hence the national referral center, treats burn patients admitted both directly and referred from other medical centers. The transfer and handover of patients is a critical step in patient care. In Israel, to date, there is no standardized and accepted transfer request form for burn patients from one medical facility to another.To construct a transfer request form to be used in all future burn patient referrals.After reviewing publicly available international transfer forms and comparing them to the admission checklist used at our unit, a structured transfer request form was constructed.After a pilot study period, testing the form in various scenarios and adapting it, the first standardized transfer form for burn patients in Israel in both English and Hebrew was implemented beginning May 2020.Implementation of a standardized transfer process will improve communication between healthcare professionals to help maintain a continuum of care. We believe that implementation of a burn transfer form in all future referrals can standardize and assure better care for burn patients, thus improving overall patient care.

Background The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a popular questionnaire for measuring the self-perception of quality of life in a given population of interest. Processing the answers of a participant comprises the calculation of 10 scores corresponding to 8 scales measuring several aspects of perceived health and 2 summary components (physical and mental). Surprisingly, no study has compared score values issued from a telephone interview versus those from an internet-based questionnaire self-completion. Objective This study aims to compare the SF-36 score values issued from a telephone interview versus those from an internet-based questionnaire self-completion. Methods Patients with an internet connection and returning home after hospital discharge were enrolled in the SENTIPAT multicenter randomized trial on the day of discharge. They were randomized to either self-completing a set of questionnaires using a dedicated website (internet group) or providing answers to the same questionnaires administered during a telephone interview (telephone group). This ancillary study of the trial compared SF-36 data related to the posthospitalization period in these 2 groups. To anticipate the potential unbalanced characteristics of the responders in the 2 groups, the impact of the mode of administration of the questionnaire on score differences was investigated using a matched sample of individuals originating from the internet and telephone groups (1:1 ratio), in which the matching procedure was based on a propensity score approach. SF-36 scores observed in the internet and telephone groups were compared using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, and the score differences between the 2 groups were also examined according to Cohen effect size. Results Overall, 29.2% (245/840) and 75% (630/840) of SF-36 questionnaires were completed in the internet and telephone groups, respectively (P Conclusions The telephone mode of administration of SF-36 involved an interviewer effect, increasing SF-36 scores. Questionnaire self-completion via the internet should be preferred, and surveys combining various administration methods should be avoided. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01769261; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT01769261

The recent Sars-CoV2 pandemic has dramatically slowed patients' access to our clinic for vascular pathology when the contagion curve peaked. The need to restore the assistance activity has led us to adopt new individual prophylaxis and hygiene measures.Doctors and staff must wear dedicated clothes. Mask and gloves are mandatory for patients. A visit is scheduled every 60 minutes to allow the sanitation of the rooms. The day before the visit patients are contacted by telephone for the Covid-19 risk triage. In the presence of symptoms the visit is postponed. In the presence of other risk factors a IgG/IgM Rapid Test for Covid-19 is performed on admission to the clinic. In the presence of fever, if an extraordinary rapid test cannot be performed, the visit must be postponed. Rapid test positive patients cannot be visited: they are placed in solitary confinement at their home waiting for a nasopharyngeal swab for Covid-19. When the rapid test is positive, immediate room sanitation also occurs. The rooms dedicated to the outpatient clinic as well as medical and not medical instruments are disinfected.The one adopted can be a useful management model for any type of care activity in order to guarantee the safety of patients and all the staff.COVID-19, Management, vascular, Outpatient clinic.La recente pandemia da SARS-CoV2 ha complicato l’accesso dei pazienti presso il nostro Ambulatorio di Patologia Vascolare, specialmente durante i giorni in cui la curva di contagio raggiungeva il picco. La necessità di fornire un’adeguata attività assistenziale ci ha spinti ad adottare una serie di misure igieniche e di profilassi che riteniamo possano essere d’esempio nella gestione di qualsiasi tipo di ambulatorio durante un pandemia. I medici ed il personale devono indossare abiti dedicati e dispositivi di protezione individuali. Mascherina chirurgica e guanti sono obbligatori anche per i pazienti. All’ingresso viene misurata la temperatura a tutti i soggetti che accedono presso la struttura. Sono previsti percorsi differenti. Vi è una zona-filtro con la sala d’attesa ed altre stanze, ed una via specifica che conduce agli ambulatori. Sono disposti numerosi erogatori di gel idro-alcolico per la disinfezione delle mani. Una visita è programmata ogni 60 minuti per consentire la sanificazione degli ambienti. Il giorno prima della visita i pazienti vengono contattati telefonicamente per la valutazione del rischio Covid-19. Esiste una scheda di triage dedicata. In presenza di sintomi la visita viene rimandata. Se esistono altri fattori di rischio viene eseguito un test rapido IgG/IgM per Covid-19 al momento dell’accesso. In presenza di febbre, se non è possibile eseguire un test rapido straordinario, la visita deve essere rimandata. I pazienti positivi al test rapido non possono essere visitati: sono posti in isolamento in domiciliare in attesa di un tampone nasofaringeo per Covid-19. Quando il test rapido è positivo avviene la sanificazione immediata delle stanze in cui è sostato il paziente. Gli ambienti dedicati all’ambulatorio e gli strumenti vengono disinfettati tra una visita e l’altra. L’adozione rigorosa di tutte queste misure riteniamo sia la chiave per garantire un’adeguata assistenza sanitaria evitando che i pazienti ed il personale siano esposti al rischio di contagio.

Since its original report in January 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has rapidly become one of the deadliest global pandemics. Early reports indicate possible neurological manifestations associated with COVID-19, with symptoms ranging from mild to severe, highly variable prevalence rates, and uncertainty regarding causal or coincidental occurrence of symptoms. As neurological involvement of any systemic disease is frequently associated with adverse effects on morbidity and mortality, obtaining accurate and consistent global data on the extent to which COVID-19 may impact the nervous system is urgently needed. To address this need, investigators from the Neurocritical Care Society launched the Global Consortium Study of Neurological Dysfunction in COVID-19 (GCS-NeuroCOVID). The GCS-NeuroCOVID consortium rapidly implemented a Tier 1, pragmatic study to establish phenotypes and prevalence of neurological manifestations of COVID-19. A key component of this global collaboration is development and application of common data elements (CDEs) and definitions to facilitate rigorous and systematic data collection across resource settings. Integration of these elements is critical to reduce heterogeneity of data and allow for future high-quality meta-analyses. The GCS-NeuroCOVID consortium specifically designed these elements to be feasible for clinician investigators during a global pandemic when healthcare systems are likely overwhelmed and resources for research may be limited. Elements include pediatric components and translated versions to facilitate collaboration and data capture in Latin America, one of the epicenters of this global outbreak. In this manuscript, we share the specific data elements, definitions, and rationale for the adult and pediatric CDEs for Tier 1 of the GCS-NeuroCOVID consortium, as well as the translated versions adapted for use in Latin America. Global efforts are underway to further harmonize CDEs with other large consortia studying neurological and general aspects of COVID-19 infections. Ultimately, the GCS-NeuroCOVID consortium network provides a critical infrastructure to systematically capture data in current and future unanticipated disasters and disease outbreaks.

The aim of this study was to promote the rapid identification of the contacts of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and therefore the control of the pandemic. Different methodologies and recommendations on contact tracing for Primary Health Care (PHC) and Public Health Services (PHS), like articles in Pubmed about COVID-19 and contact tracing, official contact definitions, the classic contact tracing model in tuberculosis (TB), information about apps for contact tracing and the role of the diagnostic tests, were reviewed. To establish efficient prevention and control measures, it is always necessary to implement contact tracing based on clinical suspicion, early diagnosis and isolation of cases and contacts and their follow-up. The classic contact tracing model in TB can be applied to this new infection, but accelerating the process given its acute nature and its potential severity. Good coordination between PHC and PHS and having sufficient resources is essential.

Syringomyelia and Chiari Syndrome are classified as rare diseases, but current known occurrence in Europe is missing. The increased ability to diagnose these pathologies by magnetic resonance imaging and its widespread availability has led to an increase of reported cases, often asymptomatic, with the need to standardize definitions, diagnostic criteria and treatments.We present shared Interregional Recommendations developed with the primary aim to estimate Syringomyelia and Chiari Syndrome prevalence and incidence in North Western Italy, with special reference to symptomatic forms.An agreement for the standardization of definitions, classifications, diagnostic criteria and surgical Recommendations was reached by the multidisciplinary Interregional Piemonte and Valle d'Aosta Chiari-Syringomyelia Consortium (Delphi method); next, in 2011 a census for Syringomyelia and Chiari Malformation was performed through the Interregional Piemonte and Valle d'Aosta Rare Disease Registry, integrated by a dedicated form in order to estimate prevalence and incidence.436 patients, 292 females, met shared interregional diagnostic criteria. Syringomyelia prevalence was estimated in 4.84:100 000; Chiari Malformation prevalence was 7.74:100 000; incidence was 0.82:100 000 and 3.08:100 000 respectively. Demographics, neuroradiological parameters and aetiology were reported (in symptomatic and asymptomatic forms). Finally, symptoms and signs, familiar and natural history were analyzed.First Italian epidemiological data (prevalence, incidence) on Chiari and syringomyelia was collected, according to shared diagnostic Recommendations. Future perspectives include the adoption of these Recommendations at national level to standardize the access to diagnosis and care process and promote multicenter clinical trials.

Objective: To compare 2011 and 2017 documentation of resuscitation decisions in older patients, including the frequency and clarity of documentation. Methods: The clinical case notes of 130 patients aged 70 years and over were examined to identify how resuscitation decisions are discussed and documented at a major teaching hospital. Results were compared to 2011 data. Results: The proportion of patients with a documented order significantly increased, from 34 to 63%, with a concurrent increased number of patients identified as Not For Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (Not for CPR). The standardised documentation has also improved rates of documented discussion, legibility and identification of the involved doctor. Conclusion: The Resuscitation Plan 7-Step Pathway has markedly improved the frequency of documented discussion, the rate of recorded Not For CPR status and clarity of documentation. There is scope for improvement as this policy is embraced across South Australia. Refereed/Peer-reviewed

INTRODUCTION A standardized letter of recommendation (SLOR) form for orthopaedic surgery residency programs has recently been adopted for use, but it has not been scientifically evaluated. The purpose of this study is to investigate the usefulness of the SLOR form in the selection process. METHODS All SLOR forms submitted to our institution over a single application cycle were extracted and analyzed. The United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scores, grades in clinical rotations, Alpha Omega Alpha status, and the number of publications were recorded for each applicant. Correlations were calculated with Spearman rho, and inter-rater reliability was evaluated by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS One thousand one hundred thirty-seven SLOR forms were analyzed for 513 applicants. There was substantial rank inflation with the SLOR form; the majority (92%) of applicants were rated as either ranked to match or in the top one-third of their rank list. Objective applicant factors such as grades and Step 1 scores demonstrated a very weak to nonexistent correlation with the summative rank (rho 0.07 to 0.13, P ≤ 0.012). Poor inter-rater reliability was observed with the intraclass correlation coefficient ranging from 0.22 to 0.33 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The usefulness of the SLOR form is limited by the very high ratings observed for all questions, and in particular, the final summative rank. Measures to reduce rank inflation must be implemented to improve the discriminant ability of the SLOR form, and if this cannot be accomplished, perhaps the form should be abandoned. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III Retrospective.

To describe the experience of using a "Burns Extrication Form" at a regional Burns Centre. Communication between the fire services and burns team previously has been regarded as poor. Significant information is collected by the fire services at the scene and this can aid the management of the patient.The Burns Extrication Form was devised to provide a clear framework of communication between the two services. Information regarding time frames, exposure to heatsmoke, fire loading (potential severity of a fire in a given space by measuring amount of combustible material in confined space), building construction, chemicals involved is passed to the medical team through this form through a National Health Service mailbox. Also, treatment provided by the fire service was documented. All data collected by this form was collated for the purpose of this study. Data ranging from 2014 to 2017 was included in this descriptive study.The patient journey following contact by fire services shows that out of the 598 persons who were involved in a fire only 92 (15%) attended the Accident and Emergency (AE) department at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital. Signs of smoke inhalation, singed nose hair and coughing were found in 190 (32%) patients; the fire service administered oxygen to 106 (18%) of these patients although this may have been initiated by Ambulance crews who were on scene prior to the Fire Crew. The remaining 506 (85%) may have not attended AE at UHB or may have attended another AE in the West Midlands base on the location of the incident and clinical needs. Of the 92 patients who attended the AE at UHB 48 (52%) were admitted to the Burns Centre in the hospital. Nine (19%) of these patients had smoke inhalation and three of these patients were managed by intubation. Birmingham North and Black Country North had the highest incidence of burns incidents, 120 and 103 respectively. Whilst, the lowest numbers were found in Birmingham South and Coventry and Solihull with 65 and 61 respectively. Additional results are described in the study.Data provided by the Fire Extrication forms helps us to assess the magnitude of fire-related injury across the West Midlands. The fire services have been shown to provide important first aid as one of the first responders at the scene. Their value in assessing the environment in and patient status helps clinicians further down the patient's journey.

Objective The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend an interval between surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy of less than 6 weeks, but only 44% of patients meet this metric nationally. We sought to identify key components of an improvement process focused on starting adjuvant radiation therapy within 6 weeks of surgery. Methods This project used an A3 model to improve a defined process measure. We studied a consecutive sample of 56 patients with oral cavity carcinoma who were treated at our institution with upfront surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiation therapy. Twelve proposed interventions tested during the study period focused on 3 key drivers of delays: delayed dental evaluation and teeth extraction, delayed radiation oncology consults, and inadequate patient engagement. The primary outcome measure was the number of days from surgery to the start of radiation therapy. Results Prior to the intervention, 62% of patients received adjuvant radiation within 6 weeks of surgery. Following the intervention, 73% of patients achieved this metric. The percentage of patients with avoidable delays decreased from 24% to 9%. The percentage of patients with unavoidable delays was relatively constant before and after the intervention (15% and 18%, respectively). Discussion Defining disease-specific metrics is critical to improving care in our head and neck cancer patient population. We demonstrate several key components to develop and improve self-defined metrics. Implications for Practice As we transition to a system of value-based care, structured quality improvement projects can have a measurable impact on cancer patient process measures.

Purpose In many jurisdictions, general practitioners (GPs) play an important role in the sick-leave and return-to-work (RTW) process of individuals with common mental disorders (CMD). Since it is insurers that decide on workers' eligibility for disability benefits, they can influence physicians' ability to act. The nature of these influences remains little documented to date. The aim of this study was therefore to describe these influences and their impacts from the GPs' perspective. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs having a diversified clientele (n = 13). The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed according to thematic analysis principles. Results The results indicated that the GPs recognized insurers as influencing their practices with patients on sick leave for CMDs. The documented influences were generally seen as constraints, but sometimes as enablers. The impacts of these influences on the GPs' practices depended on the organizational characteristics of their work context (such as limited consultation time) and other characteristics of their practice setting (such as lack of timely access to consultations with specialists). Conclusion The results brought three major issues to light: the quality of the information sent to insurers by GPs, the respect shown (or not) for workers' care preferences, and the relevance of the specialized services offered to support workers' RTW. These issues in turn reveal potential risks for workers, risks that need to be identified and recognized by all parties concerned if we are to come up with possible solutions.

Managing a patient suffering from a chronic disease requires a multidisciplinary team that can take care of them beyond the simple coordination of various specialties. In this context, a central role in the treatment of chronic heart disease is the continuity of care that should promote organic integration among different hospital departments, hospital and community. This position paper of the Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists (ANMCO) aims at defining the general principles to inspire care for complex cardiac patients at different phases of the disease. A multidisciplinary integrated holistic approach uses analytical tools able to understand the elements that characterize complexity and therefore suggest appropriate management strategies: (i) care pathways aimed at optimizing treatments; (ii) care pathways in intensive care and ward in a multidisciplinary perspective; (iii) integration of social and health needs; (iv) nursing role in the context of continuity of outpatient, community and home care; (v) promotion of educational interventions.

‘Assumptions are made and most assumptions are wrong’ (Albert Einstein) Clinical trial conduct must be consistent with trial design, yet conducting the trial according to plan remains a major challenge. We discuss the importance of optimal co-applicant team formation in trial leadership, appropriate delegation of tasks and staff supervision arrangements. Finally, we discuss five standard documents which we believe require particular attention. With appropriate engagement by or with co-applicants during the preparation of these five standard documents, we believe many of the pitfalls trials commonly experience can be avoided. The risks inherent in failing to identify and address mistaken assumptions during the preparation of these documents are discussed and recommendations for best practice suggested.

The recent publication of the resolution through which the basic directives about the contents of the documents to accredit the assessments of specialists in training maintains the model but incorporates new elements that enable important changes in the assessment. The resolution has errors and is confusing because the rules are hidden in the instructions for filling out the forms and in footnotes. Nevertheless, the resolution is more than a simple change in the forms: it is a step toward a more current assessment based on the evaluation of residents' competence. The most significant changes are a stronger role for collaborating teachers, an increase in the number of possible reasons for negative assessments, and the establishment of the rotation as the basic unit of analysis.

Facial fractures, often related to traffic accidents, assault, work-related accidents, or falls, account for a considerable number of emergencies in our hospitals and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is the imaging technique of choice in this scenario because it is widely available, fast, and useful for characterizing facial fractures and associated complications, including those located in the head. For all these reasons, MDCT is fundamental in the clinical management of these patients and in planning surgery. This paper describes the radiological anatomy of the facial region, underlining the importance of the facial buttresses, and it indicates the key points necessary for carrying out a structured approach and elaborating the corresponding radiologic report.

Duration of untreated illness (DUI) has been increasingly investigated as a predictor of clinical outcome and course in different psychiatric disorders. To date, however, there are no tools for measuring this variable. Our group developed the Psychopathological Onset and Latency to Treatment Questionnaire (POLT-Q), focused on the onset of psychiatric disorders. Aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility and manageability of POLT-Q.Fifty consecutive in- and out-patients aged 16-65 with different DSM-5 psychiatric disorders were recruited. Two raters were present during the interview: one of them administered the POLT-Q to the patient and both independently completed the questionnaire. Collected values were compared using Cohen's Kappa test and McNemar test.62.5% of the replies showed a 100% consistency between the two raters. In the 6.25% the agreement was95%. For all the replies, the K coefficient was0.8, a high degree of agreement.The POLT-Q assesses variables related to the psychopathological onset and first pharmacological treatment and, according to present findings, it represents a convenient, reliable and standardised measure for DUI. Further studies on larges sample are needed to confirm our preliminary results.

to describe, in a practical and step-by-step manner, the construction of a fully electronic platform for data collection, storage, and analysis, initially proposed for cardiovascular surgery, with interfaces that are reproducible and applicable to other surgical specialties, as well as to present the initial work experience with this instrument in cardiac surgery and the preliminary results obtained after its implementation in a Brazilian tertiary university hospital.the platform was developed based on Google tools, which are free, easy to use, and widely accessible. From the beginning of this initiative, in May 2015, to the preliminary analysis, in February 2017, data from 271 consecutive patients submitted to cardiovascular surgery were prospectively recorded and preliminarily analyzed.the initiative was implemented with full success, with 100% of patients included and without loss of any variable, in a database composed of more than 500 variables. The most frequent immediate postoperative complications were: atrial fibrillation (22.5%), bronchopneumonia (10.7%), delirium (10.3%), acute renal failure (10%), stroke (5%), and death (7%). Comparing mortality rates in the first and second years of the initiative, a reduction from 10.8% to 4% (p=0.042), respectively, was evidenced.the new proposal of data collection and storage presented in this work was fully feasible and effective. It may be useful to other surgical specialties that wish to develop methods to evaluate success and postoperative complication rates, as well as quality improvement programs.descrever de maneira prática e detalhada a criação de uma plataforma totalmente informatizada para coleta, armazenamento e análise de dados, inicialmente proposta para cirurgia cardiovascular, com interfaces reprodutíveis e aplicáveis a outras especialidades cirúrgicas, bem como, apresentar a experiência inicial de trabalho com esta ferramenta e os resultados preliminares obtidos após sua implementação em um hospital universitário terciário brasileiro.a plataforma foi desenvolvida com base nas ferramentas Google, gratuitas, de fácil utilização e amplamente acessíveis. Desde o início desta iniciativa, em maio de 2015, até a análise preliminar, em fevereiro de 2017, dados de 271 pacientes, consecutivos, submetidos à cirurgia cardiovascular foram prospectivamente recordados e analisados.a iniciativa foi implementada com pleno sucesso, com 100% dos pacientes incluídos e sem perda de qualquer variável em um banco de dados composto por mais de 500 variáveis. As complicações pós-operatórias imediatas mais frequentes foram: fibrilação atrial (22,5%), broncopneumonia (10,7%), delirium (10,3%), insuficiência renal aguda (10%), acidente vascular encefálico (5%) e morte (7%). Comparando-se as taxas de mortalidade no primeiro e segundo anos da iniciativa, uma redução de 10,8% para 4% (p=0,042), respectivamente, foi evidenciada.a nova proposta de coleta e armazenamento de dados apresentada neste trabalho mostrou-se plenamente factível e efetiva. Por serem gratuitas, de fácil manuseio e universalmente acessíveis, estas ferramentas podem ser úteis a outras especialidades cirúrgicas que desejem desenvolver métodos de avaliação de sucesso e complicações pós-operatórios, bem como, programas de melhoria de qualidade.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) 2728 Medical Evidence Report (2728 form) serves multiple purposes, including Medicare entitlement and registry, as well as documentation of the presence and presumed cause of ESRD. Dialysis facilities complete this form in newly diagnosed patients

OBJECTIVE To assess the compliance of healthcare personnel with regard to sending completely filled transfusion requisition forms. METHODS The audit was conducted at Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, and comprised requisition slips received at the hospital blood bank from September 2014 to February 2015. The British Committee for Standards in Haematology guidelines was used as the standard. Percentage of each variable on the proforma was analsyed. Rating

Emerging research documents the ways in which task-irrelevant contextual information may influence the opinions and decisions that forensic analysts reach regarding evidence (e.g., Dror and Cole, 2010; National Academy of Sciences, 2009; President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, 2016). Consequently, authorities have called for forensic analysts to rely solely on task-relevant information—and to actively avoid task-irrelevant information—when conducting analyses (National Commission on Forensic Science, 2015). In this study, we examined 97 evidence submission forms, used by 148 accredited crime laboratories across the United States, to determine what types of information laboratories solicit when performing latent print analyses. Results indicate that many laboratories request information with no direct relevance to the specific task of latent print comparison. More concerning, approximately one in six forms (16.5%) request information that appears to have a high potential for bias without any discernible relevance to latent print comparison. Solicitations for task-irrelevant information may carry meaningful consequences and current findings inform strategies to reduce the potential for cognitive bias.

The therapeutic management of malignant colorectal polyp with endoscopic resection is mainly based on specific histopathological criteria. The quality of these criteria is strongly linked to the management of the endoscopic specimen. The French Pathology Society drafted a standardized pathological report with guidelines for the macroscopic management of the endoscopic specimen and explanatory notes for each histopathological criteria. These guidelines are based on the TNM AJCC/UICC classification, 8th edition and the WHO 2010 classification of colorectal tumors, the recommendations of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy, the synthesis of the literature and on international consensus for prognostic criteria. The pathological report of a malignant colorectal polyp must clearly mention: the histological type and the size of the polyp, the pT stage and the following five prognostic criteria: the value of the resection margins, the level of tumor invasion into the submucosa, the grade of the tumor, the absence or presence of vascular emboli and of tumor budding.

Physicians are required to certify a plan of care for patients who receive Medicare skilled home health care (SHHC) services. The Centers for MedicareMedicaid Services form 485 (CMS-485) is typically used for certification of SHHC plans of care and for interactions between SHHC agencies and physicians. Little is known about how physicians use the CMS-485 or their perceptions of its usefulness with respect to coordinating care with SHHC agencies.To determine how physicians interact with SHHC agencies and use the CMS-485 in care coordination for patients receiving SHHC services.Mailed survey.Nationally representative random sample.Physicians from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile specializing in family or general medicine (excluding adolescent and sports medicine), geriatrics, geriatric psychiatry, internal medicine, or hospice and palliative medicine.Time spent reviewing the plan of care and experiences with making changes and communicating with SHHC clinicians.The response rate after 3 mailings was 53% (1044 of 1968). Of 1005 respondents who provided patient care, 72% had certified at least 1 plan of care in the past year. Nearly half (47%) reported spending less than 1 minute reviewing the CMS-485 before certification, whereas 21% reported spending at least 2 minutes. Physicians typically interacted with multiple SHHC agencies by fax or mail. Approximately 80% rarely or never changed an order on the CMS-485, and 78.3% rarely or never contacted SHHC clinicians with questions about information. The mean reported ease of contacting the SHHC agency was 4.7 (SD, 2.3) on a scale of 1 (easy) to 10 (difficult).Self-reported data and 53% response rate.The CMS-485 does not meaningfully engage physicians. Physicians spend little time reviewing or acting on the SHHC plan of care. Strategies to enhance meaningful communication between SHHC agencies and physicians are needed.National Institute on Aging and National Institute of Mental Health.

BackgroundTo better understand symptoms experienced by patients infected with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV), valid and reliable patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are needed.AimTo assess the reliability and validity of 10 patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) measures and the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) in a large national sample of patients with HCV.MethodsPre-treatment data from 961 patients with HCV starting direct acting antiviral therapy at 11 U.S. liver centers were analyzed. Internal reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient; frequency distributions were examined for floor and ceiling effects; structural validity was investigated via item-response-theory models; convergent validity was evaluated using correlations with theoretically-similar items from the HCV-PRO and memorial symptom assessment scale (MSAS); and known-groups validity was investigated by observing PRO differences by liver disease status and number of comorbidities.ResultsThe HIT-6 and the majority of the PROMIS measures yielded excellent reliability (alphas≥0.87). Ceiling effects were infrequent (&nbsp

PURPOSE To describe the implementation and efficacy of electronic capture of interventional radiology (IR) group peer review performed during morning rounds in an academic institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS Peer-review submissions 24 months before (July 2012 through June 2014) and 24 months after (July 2014 through June 2016) implementation of an electronic group IR peer review were evaluated. Electronic IR peer review assessed clinical decision-making, patient care, and technique appropriateness by using the following responses: agree, acceptable alternative, or inappropriate. Complications, near-misses, and learning opportunities were also noted, and explanations were provided in the comments. An IR attending physician documented the consensus discussion via an online form or mobile app. RESULTS After implementation of electronic capture of IR group peer reviews, 9.5% of all IR procedures (773 of 8,152) were reviewed, compared with 0.9% (63 of 7,152) before the implementation (P < .0001). On average, 3.4 ± 0.5 IR attending physicians participated in each review, and 17.3 ± 9.7 IR cases were reviewed per month by each attending physician. Peers fully agreed with the chosen technique in 729 of 773 cases (94.3%) and noted an acceptable alternative technique in 40 of 773 (5.2%). In 4 cases (0.5%), the chosen technique was rated as inappropriate. Peers fully agreed with chosen clinical decision-making and patient care in 765 of 773 cases (99%), with 8 cases (1%) deemed as acceptable alternatives. Learning opportunities were documented in 9.6% of cases (74 of 773). CONCLUSIONS Electronic IR-specific group peer review captures the clinical decision-making process, patient outcomes, technical appropriateness, and short-term complications and may provide practice-improvement solutions.

Introduction Sickle cell disease (SCD) can shorten lives and may result in severe clinical complications. Hydroxyurea (HU) is inexpensive, widely available, and National Institutes of Health (NIH) recommends HU for SCD. Despite these benefits, utilization of HU is low. Barriers to taking HU include inaccurate perceptions of serious side effects such as hair loss, a significant barrier in the African American community. However, at doses for treating SCD, the incidence of side effects is extremely low. Using a retrospective medical record review, the impact of a revised consent procedure for HU that addressed these barriers was evaluated. Methods SCD patients 2-20yo eligible for HU were examined. Patients prescribed HU versus those not prescribed HU were compared one year before and one year after revising consent procedures. Results Change in clinic practice (including revised consent procedures) resulted in 158% more patients agreeing to HU therapy (p Discussion The revised consent procedures are not resource intensive and easy to implement. Future research should address treatment acceptability, intimidation, and cultural sensitivity.

Objective To validate the Italian translation of the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale – Short Form (ICMPS-SF) in order to assess acute pain in dogs. The original English-version of the scale (the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale – Short Form - CMPS-SF) was translated into Italian according to a standard protocol to ensure linguistic and cultural validity. Nine Italian veterinary surgeons then recorded pain scores in dogs undergoing orthopaedic or soft tissue surgery using the ICMPS-SF at 2, 6, and 24 hours post-extubation. Construct validity was demonstrated using hypothesis testing. A total of 95 dogs were recruited into the study. Thirty-seven dogs underwent orthopaedic procedures and 58 dogs underwent soft tissue procedures. Twenty-three, 45, and 27 procedures were classified as mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. Statistically significant differences in the median pain scores were demonstrated between orthopaedic and soft tissue cases as well as among mild, moderate, and severe cases. Median pain scores decreased with time and changes were statistically significant. The ICMPS-SF demonstrated construct validity similar to the original English-language scale, resulting in a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of acute pain in dogs by Italian veterinarians.