1. A Mixed-Methods, International, Multisite Study to Develop and Validate a Measure of Nurse-to-Physician Communication in Simulation.
- Author
-
Foronda, Cynthia L., Alhusen, Jeanne, Budhathoki, Chakra, Lamb, Mary, Tinsley, Kim, MacWilliams, Brent, Daniels, Jessie, Baptiste, Diana Lyn, Reese, Kathie Kushto, and Bauman, Eric
- Subjects
- *
COMMUNICATION , *STATISTICAL correlation , *RESEARCH methodology , *MEDICAL cooperation , *NURSE-physician relationships , *NURSES , *NURSING education , *NURSING schools , *NURSING school faculty , *NURSING students , *PHYSICIANS , *RESEARCH , *STATISTICAL sampling , *STATISTICS , *STUDENT attitudes , *DATA analysis , *INTER-observer reliability , *RESEARCH methodology evaluation , *COLLEGE teacher attitudes , *PHYSICIANS' attitudes , *MANN Whitney U Test ,RESEARCH evaluation - Abstract
Aim This study examined the reliability and validity of the ISBAR Interprofessional Communication Rubric (IICR). bac kgroun d Improving education regarding communication in health care is a global priority. Communication is difficult to measure and no evaluation rubrics were located that uniquely focused on nurse-to-physician communication in simulation. met hod This study used a mixed-methods design and included five sites. results The IICR was determined reliable among nurse educator raters (rs = 0.79). The scale was found valid as assessed by nurse and physician experts (content validity index = 0.92). When describing their experience of using the tool, nurse educator raters described three categories: overall acceptability of the tool, ease of use, and perceptions of the importance of communication skills for patient safety. conclusion Teaching and evaluating communication in simulation with a standardized rubric is a research area in need of further exploration and refinement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF