Search

Intermediate and high grade subtypes of non-Hodgkin's large cell (LCL) and immunoblastic lymphomas exhibit considerable variability, and histologic morphology alone may not adequately characterize those features important for prognosis. The relationship between nuclear morphology and survival was assessed in a series of 50 cases of large cell lymphomas in which ploidy, proliferation, and nuclear area (NA) were measured. Ploidy was calculated by both DNA index (DI) and DNA histogram type (DHT). Proliferation was calculated from the proportion of S phase (SPF) cells present in the DHT. These four parameters were measured using image cytometry of Feulgen-stained nuclei from fine-needle aspirations. To characterize the relationship with survival, these parameters were associated with the clinical follow-up of the patients. The results show that of the 50 LCL cases, only 5 were clearly aneuploid, whereas the remaining 45 were either diploid (29 cases), tetraploid/hypotetraploid (13 cases), or weakly aneuploid (hyperdiploid, 3 cases). Of the 34 patients who died from their disease, both smaller NA and DI correlated with longer survival in an equivalent fashion; neither conferred greater sensitivity when combined with the other. The SPF did not correlate with survival. In LCL, aneuploidy seems to be a relatively uncommon event, but when present ploidy measurement appears useful to define prognosis.

Background. Numerous treatment strategies have been tried with the aim of improving results for patients with intermediate-grade lymphomas (IGL) over those achieved with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, and bleomycin (CHOP-Bleo), and numerous prognostic models have been developed to identify and separate risk groups. This study reports on a new protocol for Ann Arbor Stages II-IV IGL that consists of CHOP-Bleo alternated with a new regimen of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, etoposide, and dexamethasone (CMED) and radiation therapy and demonstrates the usefulness of prognostic models for identifying risk groups and comparing treatment programs. Methods. One hundred seventy patients with Ann Arbor Stages II-IV IGL were treated with alternating cycles of CHOP-Bleo and CMED for a total of 12 cycles. Involved field radiation therapy was interspersed with courses of chemotherapy for patients with Stage II and Stage III disease. Results were analyzed and compared with those of the authors' previous study of CHOP-Bleo and radiation therapy using the Ann Arbor staging system, their earlier prognostic model, and the recently published International Index. Results. A complete remission occurred in 78% of the patients. The overall 5-year survival rate was 67%. Survival was better for patients with Ann Arbor Stage II disease (80%) than for those with Stage III or Stage IV (67% and 58%, respectively). High tumor burden, above-normal levels of serum lactic dehydrogenase, serum β2-microglobulin, and Ann Arbor Stage IV disease were adverse factors. The International Index and the authors' earlier prognostic model separated four prognostic groups. CHOP-Bleo/CMED was generally well tolerated. Neutropenic fever was the major complication that occurred in 25 patients during treatment. Six of these patients died of sepsis. Conclusions. This study demonstrated that CHOP-Bleo/CMED is a well-tolerated regimen that produced better results than those reported for a former study that used CHOP-Bleo alone. Further, results for CHOP-Bleo/CMED compared favorably with those of other second and third-generation regimens. The study also validated the usefulness of prognostic models and, in particular, the new International Index for identifying risk groups.

Adding irinotecan and/or oxaliplatin to every-2-week 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) prolongs survival in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) but increases neutropenia frequency. Pegfilgrastim is indicated to decrease infection as manifested by febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients receiving chemotherapy at14-day intervals. This randomized, placebo-controlled phase II study examined pegfilgrastim efficacy and safety in patients with CRC receiving every-2-week chemotherapy.Patients with CRC were randomized 1:1 to pegfilgrastim 6 mg or placebo administered per-cycle on day 4. Randomization was stratified by chemotherapy regimen (patients received every-2-week FOLFOX4 [5-FU/LV/oxaliplatin], FOLFIRI [5-FU/LV/irinotecan], or FOIL [5-FU/LV/oxaliplatin/irinotecan] at physician discretion). The primary endpoint was incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia. Secondary endpoints included incidence of grade 3/4 FN and adverse events. After 4 cycles of study treatment, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were followed foror= 2 years in long-term follow-up.Of 241 eligible patients analyzed, 118 were in the placebo and 123 in the pegfilgrastim group. In the treatment period, the odds ratio for grade 3/4 neutropenia for pegfilgrastim versus placebo was 0.19 (95% CI, 0.10-0.37; P.001); grade 3/4 FN incidence was also significantly lower in pegfilgrastim-treated patients (2%) compared with placebo-treated patients (8%; P = .04). Pegfilgrastim was well tolerated, with leukocyte counts remaining stable during cycles 2-4. In long-term follow-up, both treatment groups had similar PFS and OS.Pegfilgrastim was well tolerated in patients with CRC receiving every-2-week chemotherapy and significantly reduced neutropenia and FN compared with placebo, though FN was uncommon in both treatment groups. Results suggest that pegfilgrastim administration is feasible in CRC patients receiving every-2-week chemotherapy.