Search

ImportanceAmyloid-β positron emission tomography (PET) imaging allows in vivo detection of fibrillar plaques, a core neuropathological feature of Alzheimer disease (AD). Its diagnostic utility is still unclear because amyloid plaques also occur in patients with non-AD dementia.ObjectiveTo use individual participant data meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of amyloid positivity on PET in a wide variety of dementia syndromes.Data sourcesThe MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were searched from January 2004 to April 2015 for amyloid PET studies.Study selectionCase reports and studies on neurological or psychiatric diseases other than dementia were excluded. Corresponding authors of eligible cohorts were invited to provide individual participant data.Data extraction and synthesisData were provided for 1359 participants with clinically diagnosed AD and 538 participants with non-AD dementia. The reference groups were 1849 healthy control participants (based on amyloid PET) and an independent sample of 1369 AD participants (based on autopsy).Main outcomes and measuresEstimated prevalence of positive amyloid PET scans according to diagnosis, age, and apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 status, using the generalized estimating equations method.ResultsThe likelihood of amyloid positivity was associated with age and APOE ε4 status. In AD dementia, the prevalence of amyloid positivity decreased from age 50 to 90 years in APOE ε4 noncarriers (86% [95% CI, 73%-94%] at 50 years to 68% [95% CI, 57%-77%] at 90 years; n = 377) and to a lesser degree in APOE ε4 carriers (97% [95% CI, 92%-99%] at 50 years to 90% [95% CI, 83%-94%] at 90 years; n = 593; P

In the process of reworking sediments and thus shaping biogeochemical processes, marine bottom-dwelling animals are thought to play a pivotal role in many benthic environments. Bioturbation (particle reworking) includes the downward transport of particles into the sediment as a major process and is sometimes detected as subsurface maxima (peaks) of specific particulate substances (tracers). Here, we document the fact that subsurface peaks, such as those typically attributed to biological particle transport in sediments, may equally be generated by otter boards in bottom-trawling fishery. Boards can generate tracer peaks whereby they scoop sediment from the surface, flip it over, and deposit it onto the adjacent seafloor. These peaks are indistinguishable from those generated by benthic fauna burying surface material at sediment depth. We demonstrate this for the particle tracer chlorophyll a in silty sand from the western Baltic Sea with fauna that generally do not burrow deep in a global comparison. Our inability to distinguish the driving processes generating the peaks indicates limits to our understanding of the magnitude and spatial extent of bioturbation traces in this environment. It also poses a problem for the assessment of fishery resource use and benthic processes. However, based on natural fauna abundance, behavioral information, and fishery intensity data, we identify macrofauna and not otter boards as the dominant cause of peaks at the sites investigated here. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the process of reworking sediments and thus shaping biogeochemical processes, marine bottom dwelling animals are thought to play a pivotal role in many benthic environments. This aspect of bioturbation (particle reworking) is often partitioned into short distance local and non-local transport acting over relatively longer distances. Here we document that subsurface peaks, such as those typically attributed to biological particle transport in sediments, may equally be generated by otter boards in bottom trawling fishery. Boards can generate tracer peaks whereby they scoop sediment from the surface, flip it over and deposit it onto the adjacent sea floor. These peaks are indistinguishable from those (presumably) generated by benthic fauna in a process whereby. We demonstrate this for the particle tracer chlorophyll a in silty sand from the Western Baltic Sea with fauna that generally does not burrow deep in a global comparison. Our inability to distinguish the driving processes generating the peaks indicates limits to our understanding of magnitude and spatial extend of bioturbation traces in this environment. It also poses a problem to the assessment of fishery resource use and benthic ecosystem services. However, we can clearly identify macrofauna and not otter boards as the cause for peaks at the sites investigated here. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]