Search

Dear Editor, Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder, which, in cases of moderate-to-severe disease, requires long-term systemic therapy.1 For patients with an inadequate response or intolerance to a specific systemic therapy, switching psoriasis treatments is a common practice that may improve outcomes. At week 24, 19 (83%) patients receiving FAE and 31 (63%) patients receiving MTX switched to ixekizumab, while 48 (98%) patients receiving ixekizumab continued treatment. Efficacy and safety of ixekizumab after switching from fumaric acid esters or methotrexate in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis naïve to systemic treatment. [Extracted from the article]

Purpose: Currently, in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) there is a lack of evidence demonstrating optimal biologic treatment response with respect to disease duration. The aim of this post-hoc analysis, using real world data from the Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO), is to provide evidence if early intervention with biologics is associated with better treatment outcomes and if there is any difference among drug classes or individual biologics., Materials and Methods: For this post-hoc analysis patients were categorised into two subgroups according to shorter (≤2 years) or longer (>2 years) disease duration. Analysis was performed on anti-interleukin (IL)-17A cohort vs other biologics cohort, anti-IL-17A vs other drug classes, and pairwise comparisons of ixekizumab vs individual biologics, provided that the statistical models converged. Analysis investigated the association of disease duration with the proportion of patients achieving 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index score (PASI 100) at week 12. Adjusted comparative analyses, reported as odds ratio (OR), were performed using Frequentist Model Averaging (FMA) for each cohort or treatments within each subcategory of the subgroups., Results: At week 12, anti-IL-17A and other biologics cohorts displayed minimal differences in numerical response rate for PASI 100 with respect to disease duration. The anti-IL-17A cohort showed a higher numerical PASI 100 response rate compared to the other biologic cohort irrespective of disease duration (≤2 years: 36.7% vs 21.8%; >2 years: 35.8% vs 21.9%)., Conclusion: Overall, the results do not clearly indicate that treating patients early is critical in achieving optimal patient outcomes. Furthermore, patients treated with ixekizumab show numerically higher response rates relative to other individual biologics irrespective of disease duration.

Background: Available network meta-analyses (NMAs) comparing the efficacy of biologics in nail psoriasis (NP) have not included recently approved biologics such as bimekizumab nor have they provided comparisons up to 1 year., Objective: We conducted two NMAs that update and extend results from a previous NMA comparing biologics for achieving complete resolution of NP., Methods: Bayesian NMAs were performed using a generalized linear model with a logit link to model the binary outcome of nail clearance at weeks 24-28 and 48-52., Results: For the NMA at weeks 24-28, which included seven biologics and placebo, the absolute probability of achieving complete resolution of NP was highest for ixekizumab (46.4%; 95% credibility interval [CrI] 35.2-58.0), followed by brodalumab (37.1%; 95% CrI 17.1-62.2) and bimekizumab (30.3%; 95% CrI 12.7-53.9). For the NMA at weeks 48-52, which included six biologics, the absolute probability was highest for ixekizumab (77.2%; 95% CrI 51.1-93.4), followed by adalimumab (75.6%; 95% CrI 61.5-87.3) and brodalumab (71.9%; 95% CrI 38.4-93.2)., Conclusion: Among biologics included in these two NMAs, ixekizumab has the highest absolute probability of achieving complete resolution of NP. Results may help to inform treatment decisions for patients with NP.

Aim: Serum acid phosphatase and prostate specific antigen have been utilized as disease markers in prostate cancer, one of the commonest cancers of the elderly. Serum ceruloplasmin (Cp) increases in cancer patients; it may be a reliable marker for prostate cancer, but few data are available on specificity and sensitivity of Cp values., Methods: Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) and Cp was determined in Greek patients suffering from histologically proven prostate carcinoma or benign hyperplasia. The results were compared with those in controls matched for sex and age., Results: In all studied subjects with a prostate cancer, serum Cp values were higher than age-matched healthy controls; they were also higher in cases with benign hyperplasia. No difference in serum Cp was noted among patients with earlier and advanced stages of the tumor. No difference in Cp was also found between benign hyperplasia and normal controls. There exists a significant difference in serum PSA between both prostate cancer and benign hyperplasia cases. There exists also a difference between benign hyperplasia cases and controls., Conclusion: It is suggested that serum Cp may complement the biochemical screening in prostate carcinoma, especially in cases where this cancer is not accompanied by elevation of serum PSA. However, it is not of help in differentiating prostate cancer from prostate benign hyperplasia.