Search

Background: This study aims to investigate the characteristics of concomitant distal radius and scaphoid fractures and determine outcome differences of operative and nonoperative management., Methods: A retrospective search of a level-1 trauma center's database over a 15-year period (2007-2022) for concomitant distal radius and scaphoid fractures in adult patients was completed. In all, 31 cases were reviewed for mechanism of injury, method of fracture management, distal radius fracture AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, scaphoid fracture classification, time to radiographic scaphoid union, time to motion, and other demographics. A multivariate statistical analysis was completed comparing outcomes in operative versus conservative management of the scaphoid fracture in these patients. Outcomes were defined as time to radiographic union and time to motion., Results: In all, 22 cases of operative fixation of the scaphoid and 9 cases of nonoperative management of the scaphoid were reviewed. One case of nonunion was identified in the operative group. Operative management of scaphoid fractures resulted in a statistically significant reduction in time to motion (2-week reduction) and time to radiographic union (8-week reduction)., Conclusions: This study demonstrates that operative management of scaphoid fractures in the setting of a concomitant distal radius fracture reduces the time to radiographic union and time to clinical motion. This suggests that operative management is ideal in patients who are good candidates for surgery and desire earlier return of motion. However, conservative management should be considered, as nonoperative care showed no statistical difference regarding union rates of scaphoid or distal radius fractures., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: R.R. is a consultant for Medartis. All other authors have no conflicts of interests to disclose.

Case: A 23-year-old man presented with a 2-month-old injury involving a volar base metacarpal fracture dislocation of carpometacarpal joint (CMC), metacarpophalangeal joint (MP) dislocation, floating metacarpal, and proximal phalanx base fracture. Treatment involved open reduction of volar base metacarpal's fracture and CMC dislocation, MP joint reduction, collateral ligament repair, and proximal phalanx fixation with plates and screws. A modified Eaton-Littler procedure with flexor carpi radialis tendon enhanced CMC joint stability. At 6 weeks, fractures had healed well, achieving good thumb motion. One-year follow-up showed no arthritis or dislocation., Conclusion: Thumb injuries are relatively common and can involve complex fractures and dislocations. Open reduction of the delayed fractures, dislocations, and ligament repair and reconstruction can lead to successful outcome., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSCC/C441)., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Maxillofacial fractures in the pediatric population are generally managed by conservative approaches such as soft diet and medication or semi-invasive procedures namely inter-maxillary fixation or circum-mandibular wiring. These approaches are preferred over any invasive treatment to minimize injury to the growing skeleton and tooth germs. Displaced fractures that cause functional problems such as restricted mouth opening, malocclusion or impaired breathing, mandate open reduction and internal fixation. However, surgical management is associated with morbidity related to general anesthesia, risk of injury to vital structures, and potential, skeletal or dental growth disturbances. This case report describes a non-invasive method of managing displaced, multiple fractures of the mandible in a pediatric patient, with the use of low intensity pulsed ultrasound to achieve favorable clinical outcomes and nil complications. Neither immobilization of the mandible with inter-maxillary fixation nor open reduction and internal fixation was used. Low intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy is painless and patient-friendly., (Copyright © 2024 Chinese Medical Association. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Mandibular fractures account for up to 48.8% of pediatric facial fractures; however, there are a wide range of available treatment modalities, and few studies describe trends in adverse outcomes of these injuries. This study describes fracture cause, pattern, management, and treatment outcomes in pediatric mandibular fracture patients., Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients younger than 18 years who were evaluated for mandibular fractures at a pediatric level I trauma center between 2006 and 2021. Variables studied included demographics, cause, medical history, associated facial fractures, other associated injuries, treatments, and outcomes., Results: A total of 530 pediatric patients with 829 mandibular fractures were included in the analysis. Most isolated mandibular fractures were treated with physical therapy and rest ( n = 253 [47.7%]). Patients with combination fractures, specifically those involving the parasymphysis and angle, were 2.63 times more likely to undergo surgical management compared with patients with a single facial fracture ( P < 0.0001). Older age ( P < 0.001), sex ( P = 0.042), mechanism ( P = 0.008) and cause of injury ( P = 0.002), and specific fractures (eg, isolated angle [ P = 0.001]) were more associated with adverse outcomes. The odds of adverse outcomes were higher for patients treated with closed reduction and external fixation or open reduction and internal fixation compared with conservative management (OR, 1.8, 95% CI, 1.0 to 3.2; and OR, 2.1, 95% CI, 1.2 to 3.5, respectively)., Conclusions: Fracture type, mechanism of injury, and treatment modality in pediatric mandibular fractures are associated with distinct rates and types of adverse outcomes. Large-scale studies characterizing these injuries are critical for guiding physicians in the management of these patients., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Risk, III., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: Rib fixation for traumatic rib fractures is advocated to decrease morbidity and mortality in select patient populations. We intended to investigate the effect of combination osseous thoracic injuries on mortality with the hypothesis that combination injuries will worsen overall mortality and that SSRF will improve outcomes in combination injuries and in high-risk patients., Methods: Patients with rib fractures were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Project registry from 2019. Patients were then divided into rib fracture(s) alone or in combination with sternal, thoracic vertebra, or scapula fracture. Patients were also categorized into those with COPD and smokers. Patients with AIS >3 outside of thorax were excluded. Patients were subcategorized into those who had rib fixation verse nonoperative management for all subgroups. Analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of rib fixation., Results: A total of 111,066 patients were included for analysis. The overall mortality was 1.4%. Patients with COPD had over double the mortality risk, with an overall mortality of 3.4%. Combination injuries did not appear to increase mortality. SSRF did not decrease mortality; however, the number of patients in this group was too small to complete statistical analysis. The overall complication rate was 0.43%. There was a trend towards an increase in extrapulmonary complications in the group that underwent surgical fixation., Discussion: Mortality from rib fractures with concomitant osseous thoracic fracture appears to be low. However, mortality is increased in patients with COPD regardless of rib fracture pattern. The number of patients who underwent SSRF was too small to make a statistical comparison., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objectives: To analyze patients, injury patterns, and treatment of femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in young patients with FNFs associated with shaft fractures (assocFNFs) to improve clinical outcomes. The secondary goal was to compare this injury pattern to that of young patients with isolated FNFs (isolFNFs)., Design: Retrospective multicenter cohort series., Setting: Twenty-six North American level-1 trauma centers., Patient Selection Criteria: Skeletally mature patients, <50 years old, treated with operative fixation of an FNF with or without an associated femoral shaft fracture., Outcome Measures and Comparisons: The main outcome measurement was treatment failure defined as nonunion, malunion, avascular necrosis, or subsequent major revision surgery. Odds ratios for these modes of treatment were also calculated., Results: Eighty assocFNFs and 412 isolFNFs evaluated in this study were different in terms of patients, injury patterns, and treatment strategy. Patients with assocFNFs were younger (33.3 ± 8.6 vs. 37.5 ± 8.7 years old, P < 0.001), greater in mean body mass index [BMI] (29.7 vs. 26.6, P < 0.001), and more frequently displaced (95% vs. 73%, P < 0.001), "vertically oriented" Pauwels type 3, P < 0.001 (84% vs. 43%) than for isolFNFs, with all P values < 0.001. AssocFNFs were more commonly repaired with an open reduction (74% vs. 46%, P < 0.001) and fixed-angle implants (59% vs. 39%) (P < 0.001). Importantly, treatment failures were less common for assocFNFs compared with isolFNFs (20% vs. 49%, P < 0.001) with lower rates of failed fixation/nonunion and malunion (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). Odds of treatment failure [odds ratio (OR) = 0.270, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.15-0.48, P < 0.001], nonunion (OR = 0.240, 95% CI, 0.10-0.57, P < 0.001), and malunion (OR = 0.920, 95% CI, 0.01-0.68, P = 0.002) were also lower for assocFNFs. Excellent or good reduction was achieved in 84.2% of assocFNFs reductions and 77.1% in isolFNFs (P = 0.052). AssocFNFs treated with fixed-angle devices performed very well, with only 13.0% failing treatment compared with 51.9% in isolFNFs treated with fixed-angle constructs (P = <0.001) and 33.3% in assocFNFs treated with multiple cannulated screws (P = 0.034). This study also identified the so-called "shelf sign," a transverse ≥6-mm medial-caudal segment of the neck fracture (forming an acute angle with the vertical fracture line) in 54% of assocFNFs and only 9% of isolFNFs (P < 0.001). AssocFNFs with a shelf sign failed in only 5 of 41 (12%) cases., Conclusions: AssocFNFs in young patients are characterized by different patient factors, injury patterns, and treatments, than for isolFNFs, and have a relatively better prognosis despite the need for confounding treatment for the associated femoral shaft injury. Treatment failures among assocFNFs repaired with a fixed-angle device occurred at a lower rate compared with isolFNFs treated with any construct type and assocFNFs treated with multiple cannulated screws. The radiographic "shelf sign" was found as a positive prognostic sign in more than half of assocFNFs and predicted a high rate of successful treatment., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Summary: Multiple mandibular fractures with condylar involvement are challenging to treat. This article presents a series of steps to simplify the treatment and improve the outcomes in open reduction and internal fixation of multiple mandibular fractures with condylar involvement. Four new elements are identified: three-dimensional printing, model surgery, Kirschner wires to manipulate the segments in condylar fractures, and a top-to-bottom sequence. This algorithm has contributed to streamlining the procedure and improving the outcomes of these challenging fractures. For the same operator, reduction and osteosynthesis require approximately 40 minutes less than before the adoption of the new protocol. The authors have not encountered suboptimal reductions or situations where the screws were too long, necessitating exchange for shorter ones in revision surgery., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: Multiple displaced rib fractures often result in a poor prognosis. Open reduction and internal fixation has been shown to provide benefits for patients with displaced rib fractures and flail chest. Nevertheless, for patients who are unwilling or unsuitable for surgery, the therapeutic options are limited. We developed a novel plastic vacuum device for rib fractures external stabilization. This study aims to compare the therapeutic efficacy of this device against a traditional chest strap in polytrauma patients with multiple rib fractures., Methods: A retrospective investigation was conducted on polytrauma patients with multiple rib fractures admitted to our trauma center between March 2020 and March 2023. Patients were categorized into two groups: vacuum external fixation and chest strap. Comparative analysis was conducted on baseline parameters, injury characteristics, and clinical outcomes between the two groups., Results: In this study, 54 patients were included, with 28 receiving chest strap and 26 undergoing vacuum external fixation. Results showed that, at 3 days and 7 days postintervention, the vacuum external fixation group had significantly lower visual analog scale scores during deep breathing and coughing (P < .05). Vacuum external fixation also reduced pleural drainage duration and volume, as well as lowered the risk of pneumonia and other complications (P < .05). Furthermore, the vacuum external fixation group demonstrated notable improvements in vital capacity, tidal volume, blood-gas test results, and a shorter hospital length of stay., Conclusions: According to the study findings, vacuum external fixation appears to offer benefits to patients with multiple rib fractures, potentially reducing the risk of complications and improving overall clinical outcomes., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of intramedullary nailing fixation via suprapatellar approach and medial parapatellar approach in semi-extended position in the treatment of multiple tibial fractures., Methods: The clinical data of 43 patients with multiple tibial fractures treated with intramedullary nailing fixation between July 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 23 patients treated with suprapatellar approach in semi-extended position (group A) and 20 patients with medial parapatellar approach in semi-extended position (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, time from injury to operation, AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and range of motion (ROM) of the knee joint between the two groups ( P >0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, and fracture healing time were recorded and compared. The VAS score and ROM of the knee joint were analyzed at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after operation, and the incidence of postoperative complications was observed; knee function was evaluated by Lysholm score at last follow-up., Results: The operations were successfully completed in both groups, and there was no complication such as nerve and blood vessel injury during operation, and all incisions healed by first intention. There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency between the two groups ( P >0.05), but the incision length in group B was significantly longer than that in group A ( P <0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 12-30 months, with an average of 21.1 months. The VAS score decreased and ROM increased gradually in both groups with time after operation, showing significant differences between different time points ( P <0.05). The VAS score of group B was significantly lower than that of group A at 4 and 8 weeks after operation ( P <0.05); there was no significant difference in VAS score and ROM between the two groups at other time points ( P >0.05). There was no significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups ( P >0.05). During the follow-up, there was no complication such as internal fixator loosening, breakage, and loss of fracture reduction. At last follow-up, the Lysholm score in group B was significantly better than that in group A ( P <0.05)., Conclusion: Both the suprapatellar approach and the medial parapatellar approach in semi-extended position can achieve satisfactory results in the treatment of multiple tibial fractures. The medial parapatellar approach has lower symptoms of early knee pain and better long-term function.

It's reported that 10% of the inpatients by traumas have fractured ribs. It's easy to judge if it's the case of flail chest, or respiratory failure due to airway injury or pulmonary contusion. There is no guideline for treatments of a patient who has multiple ribs fractures without respiratory failure. We did the surgical stabilization of rib fractures for 10 cases from 2020 to October 2023. As a result, we find out useful surgical indication for treatment of rib fractures.

In case that met several indication criteria with 4 or more rib fractures, we performed surgical stabilization of multiple fractured ribs using a plate and screw system( Super FIXORB MX) that was made of uncalcined hydroxyapatite (u-HA)/poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) composite material with excellent bioactivity and absorbability. We report our clinical experience of 7 cases in which this device was used. Although there is still room for further consideration of the technique and the strength of the device itself, computed tomography( CT) images taken 9 months after surgery showed that the fixative device was almost assimilated with the bone at the fracture repair site in cases where fixation was successful.

Competing Interests: The authors certify that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Background: The trend of using navigation systems for treating facial bone fractures is increasing. Nevertheless, any detailed recommendation on using a navigation system to treat nasal bone fracture has never been discussed. Plastic surgeons are prone to do closed reduction of nasal bone fractures with remnant posttraumatic edema in the pediatric population. This study hypothesized that the navigation system benefits this population's treatment of nasal bone fractures., Methods: The authors evaluated the medical records, plain x-ray, and facial computed tomography scans of 44 pediatric patients (below the age of 18) with nasal bone fractures treated with a closed reduction from May 2021 to December 2022. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scan were used to assess the outcome., Results: The average age for 44 pediatric nasal bone fracture patients was 10. Fifteen were female, while males were 29. All cases were successfully corrected clinically and radiologically without noticeable complications., Conclusions: Using navigation systems to correct nasal bone fractures provides additional benefits for the pediatric population. This technique is especially useful if the fracture is located at the junction between the nasal bone and nasal process of the maxilla and is combined with concurrent old nasal bone fractures., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.)

Abstract: Nasal structures have both functional and cosmetic significance. These structures maintain the shape of the nose and regulate the nasal airflow. During trauma, fractures of the nasal bone are frequently associated with nasal septum deviations. This can lead to the nasal bone collapsing and nasal obstruction. The septoplasty technique is a major surgical intervention to improve nasal obstructions, with the submucosal resection of the deviated septum. In the past, septoplasty was deferred until the nasal bone fracture was healed to reduce the postoperative risk of saddle-nose and flat nose deformities. Advances in technology have enabled surgeons to attempt septoplasty together with a closed reduction of the nasal bone fraction. It is most important to preserve the septal support structure during surgery. Hence, we advocate that the nasal septum be reset in the midline rather than removed, by modified endoscopic septoplasty., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.)

Background: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) contributes to significant chest wall injury similar to blunt trauma. With benefits realized for surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRFs) for flail injuries and severely displaced fractures following trauma, SSRF for chest wall injury following CPR could be advantageous, provided good functional and neurologic outlook. Experience is limited. We present a review of patients treated with SSRF at our institution following CPR., Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing SSRF following CPR was performed between 2019 and 2020. Perioperative inpatient data were collected with outpatient follow-up as able., Results: Five patients underwent SSRF over the course of the 2-year interval. All patients required invasive ventilation preoperatively or had impending respiratory. Mean age was 59 ± 12 years, with all patients being male. Inciting events for cardiac arrest included respiratory, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, pulseless electrical activity, and anaphylaxis. Time to operation was 6.6 ± 3 days. Four patients demonstrated anterior flail injury pattern with or without sternal fracture, with one patient having multiple severely displaced fractures. Surgical stabilization of rib fracture was performed appropriately to restore chest wall stability. Mean intensive care unit length of stay was 9.8 ± 6.4 days and overall hospital length of stay 24.6 ± 13.2 days. Median postoperative ventilation was 2 days (range, 1-15 days) with two patients developing pneumonia and one requiring tracheostomy. There were no mortalities at 30 days. One patient expired in hospice after a prolonged hospitalization. Disposition destination was variable. No hardware complications were noted on outpatient follow-up, and all surviving patients were home., Conclusion: Chest wall injuries are incurred frequently following CPR. Surgical stabilization of these injuries can be considered to promote ventilator liberation and rehabilitation. Careful patient selection is paramount, with surgery offered to those with reversible causes of arrest and good functional and neurologic outcome. Experience is early, with further investigation needed., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level V., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Long-term outcomes after rib fractures and the effect of treatment modality or chest wall injury severity on these outcomes remains uncertain. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the long-term pulmonary function, thoracic pain, and quality of life in patients admitted with rib fractures., Methods: Patients admitted with rib fractures between January 1, 2012, and December 1, 2019, were included. Data on long-term outcomes were collected during one follow-up visit. Patients were stratified by chest wall injury severity (one or two rib fractures, ≥3 rib fractures, or a flail chest) and treatment modality (surgical stabilization of rib fractures [SSRF] or nonoperative management). Multivariable analysis was performed to compare outcomes after SSRF with nonoperative treatment in patients with three or more rib fractures., Results: In total, 300 patients were included. The median follow-up was 39 months (P25-P75, 18-65 months). At follow-up, the corrected forced vital capacity returned to 84.7% (P25-P75, 74.3-93.7) and the forced expiratory volume in 1 second to 86.3% (P25-P75, 75.3-97.0) of the predicted reference values. Quality of life was determined using the Short Form-12 version 2 and EuroQoL-5D-5L. The Short Form-12 version 2 physical and mental component summary were 45 (P25-P75, 38-54) and 53 (P25-P75, 43-60), respectively. The EuroQoL-5D-5L utility score was 0.82 (P25-P75 0.66-0.92) and visual analog scale score 75 (P25-P75 70-85). This indicated a quality of life within normal population ranges. Moderate to severe thoracic pain was reported by 64 (21.3%) patients. Long-term outcomes returned to values within population ranges and were similar across chest wall injury severity and for patients treated with SSRF or nonoperatively., Conclusion: While long-term pulmonary function and quality of life recover to values considered normal, subjective thoracic complaints, such as pain and dyspnea, remain frequently present following rib fractures. No effect of chest wall injury severity or treatment modality on long-term outcomes was demonstrated., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic, level III., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Rib fractures occur in approximately 10% of trauma patients and are associated with more than 50% of patients with scapula fractures. This study investigates the location and patterns of rib fractures and flail chest occurring in patients with operatively treated scapula fractures. Novel frequency mapping techniques of rib fracture patterns in patients who also injure the closely associated scapula can yield insight into surgical approaches and fixation strategies for complex, multiple injuries patients. We hypothesize that rib fractures have locations of common occurrence when presenting with concomitant scapula fracture that requires operative treatment., Methods: Patients with one or more rib fractures and a chest computed tomography scan between 2004 and 2018 were identified from a registry of patients having operatively treated scapula fractures. Unfurled rib images were created using Syngo-CT Bone Reading software (Siemens Inc., Munich, Germany). Rib fracture and flail segment locations were marked and measured for standardized placement on a two-dimensional chest wall template. Location and frequency were then used to create a gradient heat map., Results: A total of 1,062 fractures on 686 ribs were identified in 86 operatively treated scapula fracture patients. The mean ± SD number of ribs fractured per patient was 8.0 ± 4.1 and included a mean ± SD of 12.3 ± 7.2 total fractures. Rib fractures ipsilateral to the scapula fracture occurred in 96.5% of patients. The most common fracture and flail segment location was ipsilateral and subscapular; 51.4% of rib fractures and 95.7% of flail segments involved ribs 3 to 6., Conclusion: Patients indicated for operative treatment of scapula fractures have a substantial number of rib fractures that tend to most commonly occur posteriorly on the rib cage. There is a pattern of subscapular rib fractures and flail chest adjacent to the thick bony borders of the scapula. This study enables clinicians to better evaluate and diagnose scapular fracture patients with concomitant rib fractures., Level of Evidence: Diagnostic test, level IV., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: Degloving foot injuries are challenging to treat and associated with life-long sequelae for patients. An appropriate debridement of ischemic soft tissues with maximal preservation of glabrous skin is key during the reconstruction of these injuries. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography is an established technique for the intraoperative evaluation of tissue perfusion., Patient Concerns: Two patients sustained complex foot injuries in traffic accidents, including multiple fracture dislocations and extensive degloving of the plantar skin., Diagnosis: Clinical inspection revealed significant degloving of the glabrous skin in both patients., Interventions: After fracture fixation, ICG fluorescence angiography-assisted debridement with immediate latissimus dorsi free flap reconstruction was performed., Outcomes: In both cases, this technique allowed a precise debridement with maximal preservation of the glabrous skin. The healing of the remaining glabrous skin was uneventful and the 6-month follow-up was characterized by stable soft tissues and satisfying ambulation., Lessons: ICG fluorescence angiography is a safe, user-friendly, and quick procedure with minimal risks, expanding the armamentarium of the reconstructive surgeon. It is highly useful for the debridement of extensive plantar degloving injuries and may also help to minimize the number of procedures and the risk of infection., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Lunate coronal fracture is a rare injury, associated with impact along the capitate and lunate axis; neutralization of this axial force is important for satisfactory patient outcomes. This report presents a case of a 51-year-old man with a lunate coronal fracture associated with coronal fractures in the proximal carpal bones and volar and proximal dislocation of the distal carpal row. Open reduction and internal fixation with a dorsal distraction bridge plate were performed. Solid bony union was achieved at the fracture site and the patient resumed full activities without difficulty. Use of distraction bridge plate fixation can support treating this type of injury, in particular, in cases where the lunate fracture is difficult to treat with conventional osteosynthesis techniques; the presented approach provides good short-term results.

Background: Naso-orbitoethmoid fractures associated with ipsilateral zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures are more challenging injuries than zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures alone. However, there is a paucity of information on this complex fracture pattern in the pediatric population. This study investigated the cause, treatment, and outcomes of combined zygomaticomaxillary complex and naso-orbitoethmoid fractures versus isolated zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures in pediatric patients., Methods: This was a 25-year retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients who presented to a single institution with zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Baseline patient demographics and clinical information, and concomitant injuries, treatment/operative management, and postoperative complications/deformities were recorded and compared between patients with combined zygomaticomaxillary complex and naso-orbitoethmoid fractures and patients with isolated zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures., Results: Forty-nine patients were identified to have had zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures in the authors' 25-year study period, of whom 46 had adequate clinical documentation and follow-up. Seventeen patients had combined zygomaticomaxillary complex-naso-orbitoethmoid fractures, of whom six had panfacial fractures. Both patient groups (zygomaticomaxillary complex only and combined zygomaticomaxillary complex-naso-orbitoethmoid fractures) were similar in terms of demographics. However, a significantly greater proportion of combined fracture patients experienced postoperative complications compared to isolated zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture patients, even after excluding those with panfacial fractures (87.5 percent versus 35.3 percent; p < 0.001). Enophthalmos (37.5 percent) and midface growth restriction (37.5 percent) were the two most common complications/deformities in all combined fracture patients., Conclusions: High-impact trauma can lead to zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures with associated naso-orbitoethmoid fractures in children. This injury pattern was found to cause significantly greater postoperative morbidity than isolated zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures alone. Thus, pediatric patients presenting with this complex facial fracture pattern should be closely monitored., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Risk, II., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: Outcomes after surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) have not been studied in patients with multiple rib fractures and traumatic brain injury (TBI). We hypothesized that SSRF, as compared with nonoperative management, is associated with favorable outcomes in patients with TBI., Methods: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was performed in patients with rib fractures and TBI between January 2012 and July 2019. Patients who underwent SSRF were compared to those managed nonoperatively. The primary outcome was mechanical ventilation-free days. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit length of stay and hospital length of stay, tracheostomy, occurrence of complications, neurologic outcome, and mortality. Patients were further stratified into moderate (GCS score, 9-12) and severe (GCS score, ≤8) TBI., Results: The study cohort consisted of 456 patients of which 111 (24.3%) underwent SSRF. The SSRF was performed at a median of 3 days, and SSRF-related complication rate was 3.6%. In multivariable analyses, there was no difference in mechanical ventilation-free days between the SSRF and nonoperative groups. The odds of developing pneumonia (odds ratio [OR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.38-0.98; p = 0.043) and 30-day mortality (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11-0.91; p = 0.032) were significantly lower in the SSRF group. Patients with moderate TBI had similar outcome in both groups. In patients with severe TBI, the odds of 30-day mortality was significantly lower after SSRF (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.88; p = 0.034)., Conclusion: In patients with multiple rib fractures and TBI, the mechanical ventilation-free days did not differ between the two treatment groups. In addition, SSRF was associated with a significantly lower risk of pneumonia and 30-day mortality. In patients with moderate TBI, outcome was similar. In patients with severe TBI a lower 30-day mortality was observed. There was a low SSRF-related complication risk. These data suggest a potential role for SSRF in select patients with TBI., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic, level IV., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: Distal radius fracture with simultaneous ipsilateral radial head fracture is a very rare pattern of injury. This type of injury is referred to as 'radius bipolar fracture'. Treatments for this injury pattern can be challenging because both the wrist and elbow need to be considered. There are currently no guidelines for the treatment of this specific type of injury. We report two cases of this unusual pattern of injury treated in our hospital., Patient Concerns: Case 1 was a 78-year-old female patient and case 2 was a 19-year-old female patient who visited our emergency department with left elbow and wrist pain after slipping and falling., Diagnosis: Plain radiography and computed tomography revealed radius bipolar fracture. Case 1 had an AO type C3 distal radius fracture, a Mason type III radial head fracture. Case 2 had an AO type B2 undisplaced distal radius fracture and a Mason type III radial head fracture., Interventions: In case 1, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was performed for the distal radius fracture and radial head replacement arthroplasty for the radial head fracture. In case 2, distal radius fracture was treated conservatively and ORIF was performed for the radial head fracture., Outcomes: Bony union as achieved in both cases. At 1-year follow-up, case 1 showed slight limited range of motion of the wrist. Case 2 showed no radius shortening and full range of motion of the wrist and elbow. The Quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score was 18 and 16, respectively., Lessons: After this type of injury, the radius length can be changed, and as a result, ulnar variance can be affected. When radial head replaced is considered, it would be better to operate on the wrist first, and then perform radial head replacement. In this way, radiocapitellar overstuffing or instability can be prevented. However, if ORIF is planned for proximal radius fracture, either the proximal or distal radius can be fixed first. Surgeons should try to preserve radial length during treatment to optimize patient outcomes., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Purpose: The aim of this study is to conduct clinical and radiographic evaluations of the use of percutaneous bridge plating for distal fibular fractures combined with distal tibia type III open fractures., Methods: Thirty-four patients with acute distal third fibular shaft fractures (4F2A (c) and 4F2B (c) according to the AO/OTA classification) combined with distal tibia type III open fractures were enrolled. Concurrent fibular fractures were fixed with the percutaneous bridge plating simultaneously, while distal tibia open fractures were temporally stabilized with a spanning external fixator. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), the proportional length difference of the fibula, the talocrural angle, the union rate of the fibula and tibia, the operation time, and complications at the final follow-up., Results: All fibular fractures healed with an average bone healing time of 20.7 ± 6.3 weeks (range, 16-35). The mean proportional length difference was 0.492 ± 0.732% compared with that in the uninjured fibula. The functional assessment result according to the LEFS was 74.0 ± 3.70 points (range, 57-80). No cases of fibula fracture infection developed throughout the follow-up period in any of the patients. Iatrogenic postoperative superficial peroneal nerve injury was not found in any of the patients., Conclusion: With the perspective of minimizing soft tissue problems due to high-energy trauma, the application of percutaneous bridge plating for the treatment of distal fibular fractures can be an alternative to conventional treatment methods., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.)

Cases: Two patients with complex open forearm fractures underwent initial treatment with radioulnar fusion (arthrodesis of the radius to the ulna)-one patient sustained elbow and forearm injuries in a car accident and the other had an elbow injury caused by conveyor belt entanglement., Conclusions: Differentiating viable tissue from nonviable tissue is important in the management of potentially contaminated wounds. Arthrodesis of the radius to the ulna is generally considered a salvage option for complicated forearm instability. The decision to perform arthrodesis of the radius and ulna in the initial treatment facilitated the management of soft-tissue injuries and helped prioritize hand function., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSCC/B320)., (Copyright © 2020 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Background: There are still controversies between surgical treatment and conservative treatment for multiple rib fractures (MRFs). No consensus has been reached concerning the indications and timing of surgery. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to determine the optimal treatment for MRFs., Methods: Six databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Cnki, Wanfang Database) were retrieved for all eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before January 2020. MRFs were treated either with operative reduction and internal fixation or conservative treatment. The pertinent data were retrieved. The quality of RCTs was evaluated by the modified Jadad rating scale and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software., Results: Seven RCTs involving 538 MRFs patients (260 were treated surgically vs. 278 conservatively) were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with conservative treatment, surgical treatment resulted in shorter length of hospital stay (WMD -8.48; 95% CI -11.34 to -5.63; P < 0.001), length of ICU stay (WMD -5.72; 95% CI -7.31 to -4.13; P < 0.001) and duration of mechanical ventilation (WMD -4.93; 95% CI -8.79 to -1.07; P = 0.01), with a lower risk of complications including pneumonia (RR 0.40; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.53; P < 0.001) and chest wall deformity (RR 0.07; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.14; P < 0.001). The sensitivity analysis carried out by excluding one study with significant heterogeneity showed that the rate of tracheostomy was lower in the surgical group than in the conservative group (RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.71; P = 0.0008)., Conclusions: For patients with MRFs, surgical treatment resulted in faster recovery, a lower risk of complications and better prognosis than conservative treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: In recent years, there has been a growing interest in operative treatment for multiple rib fractures and flail chest. However, to date, there is no comprehensive study that extensively focused on the incidence of complications associated with rib fracture fixation. Furthermore, there is insufficient knowledge about the short- and long-term outcomes after rib fracture fixation., Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify studies reporting on complications and/or outcome of surgical treatment after rib fractures. Complications were subdivided into (1) surgery- and implant-related complications, (2) bone-healing complications, (3) pulmonary complications, and (4) mortality., Results: Forty-eight studies were included, with information about 1,952 patients who received rib fracture fixation because of flail chest or multiple rib fractures. The overall risk of surgery- and implant-related complications was 10.3%, with wound infection in 2.2% and fracture-related infection in 1.3% of patients. Symptomatic nonunion was a relatively uncommon complication after rib fixation (1.3%). Pulmonary complications were found in 30.9% of patients, and the overall mortality was 2.9%, of which one third appeared to be the result of the thoracic injuries and none directly related to the surgical procedure. The most frequently used questionnaire to assess patient quality of life was the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) (n = 4). Four studies reporting on the EQ-5D had a weighted mean EQ-5D index of 0.80 indicating good quality of life after rib fracture fixation., Conclusion: Surgical fixation can be considered as a safe procedure with a considerably low complication risk and satisfactory long-term outcomes, with surgery- and implant-related complications in approximately 10% of the patients. However, the clinically most relevant complications such as infections occur infrequently, and the number of complications requiring immediate (surgical) treatment is low., Level of Evidence: Systematic Review, level III.

We aimed to utilize the 2010 to 2017 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to evaluate the epidemiology and efficacy of facial fracture repairs, specifically comparing multiple fracture site repairs (MFR) compared to single fracture site repairs (SFR). Of 4739 patients, 718 (15.2%) were found to have undergone MFR. A total of 577 (80.4%) of the MFRs involved the midface only. A total of 2114 (52.6%) of the SFRs were mid-face fractures, while 1825 (45.4%) involved the lower-face and only 82 (2.0%) involved the upper-face. The most frequent MFR was combined orbital and malar/zygoma repair (230 cases [32.0%]). When comparing MFR and SFR of the mid-face, MFR patients were more commonly male, White, operated on by plastic surgeons, presented with contaminated wounds, and active smokers. While MFRs were associated with a longer operative time (P < 0.001) and a longer postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001), there were no differences in reoperation or readmission. Overall, complication rates were low, but slightly higher in the mid-face MFR group (1.4% in mid-face SFR and 3.0% in mid-face MFR; P = 0.019). Sub-analysis of mid-face only MFRs and middle-lower-face MFRs revealed no difference in postoperative complication rates (3.0% and 7.0%, respectively; P = 0.071). The data presented suggests that MFR are a relatively common occurrence. Although plastic surgeons perform MFRs more frequently, it is currently unclear whether the underlying reason is a product of differences in training, coding patterns, or referral patterns. Though MFRs require more hospital resources, complications rates are low. This will help manage patient expectations and guide patient counseling before surgery, as well as help to plan postoperative care.

Case: A 50-year-old woman involved in a motorcycle accident sustained a transscaphoid transcapitate perilunate fracture dislocation with complete extrusion of the proximal scaphoid pole and lunate as a unit into the forearm. The patient underwent urgent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with screw fixation of the capitate and Kirschner wire fixation of the scaphoid, midcarpal joint, and lunotriquetral intervals. At 1-year postoperatively, radiographs confirm healing of capitate and scaphoid fractures, with no signs of avascular necrosis of the lunate., Conclusion: Despite a complex fracture-dislocation pattern, treatment with ORIF can successfully lead to scaphoid and capitate union and lunate revascularization.

Case: A child with a severe degloving injury to the dorsum of the foot and ankle had segmental loss of the tibialis anterior tendon and toe extensors. A tendon turndown procedure was used, and the repaired tendon was covered with a latissimus muscle free flap to restore active ankle dorsiflexion. Details of the procedure are described, and active dorsiflexion and functional ambulation were restored., Conclusions: The tendon turndown method is a simple and effective way to overcome segmental tendon loss of tibialis anterior and allowed restoration of active dorsiflexion in this case without relying on tendon transfers or grafting.

Congenital pain insensitivity is a rare genetic disease and its clinical manifestations are many. In orthopaedics, common complications of this disease include painless fracture and Charcot's arthropathy. We followed up a case of multiple fractures of the lower extremity in two years, during which time he came to the clinic for five painless fractures of the lower extremity in a total of six parts. A mutation was found on the NTKRI gene (chr1:156813923(hg19), NM&#95;001007792.1: c.1221938C > T). We have developed a combination of surgery and conservative treatments for his condition, focusing on the mental state of the child and considering comprehensive treatment to be the best option for this type of patient. Occult fractures caused by pain insensitivity are often treated only as fractures, however their complications require routine examination and cleaning, suitable protective shoes, splint fixation, stretching, guided exercise planning, and early treatment of injuries. Due to the risk of fracture in the future, it is important that parents pay attention to the behavior and psychology of the child, such as not letting the child participate in exercise with a risk of injury, protective measures while playing, engaging in psychological counseling, and inducing interest in mental activity. These interventions will play a very important role in preventing the recurrence of fracture., (© 2020 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

In recent years, a variety of resorbable plates have been used for craniofacial fractures. The authors report a case of plate infection that occurred more than 1 year after surgery and was difficult to distinguish from a foreign body reaction. A 19-year-old male suffered fractures of the right zygomatic bone, orbital floor, and left maxilla in a motorcycle accident. Reduction was performed using resorbable plates at 7 days after injury. The postoperative course was good. However, the patient presented 396 days after surgery with redness/swelling of the right upper eyelid and right cheek pain. There were no systemic signs of infection such as fever. A foreign body reaction to the plate was suspected. After 1 week, swelling of the patient's upper eyelid was worse, and the remaining resorbable plate was removed via a skin incision. Swelling subsequently extended to the right cheek and upper gingiva, and all plates were removed under general anesthesia on the 418th day after the first operation. The swelling subsided after removal of the plates. Pathological examination revealed neutrophil infiltration and Staphylococcus hominis was detected by bacterial culture, leading to a diagnosis of late-onset plate infection. This coagulase-negative staphylococcus usually causes infection in neonates and immunocompromised individuals. Postoperative complications of resorbable plates include foreign body reaction and infection, which are difficult to differentiate clinically. Removing the foreign body is the principal technique for obvious wound infection. A foreign body reaction with subcutaneous fluid retention is slow to heal. Therefore, early plate removal is also recommended.

Purpose: Surgical Stabilization (SSRF) is gaining popularity as an alternative to non-operative management (NOM) of patients with rib fractures, however, there are no established guidelines for patients' quantifiable evaluation and for SSRF recommendation. Known rib scoring systems include: Rib Fracture Score (RFS), Chest Wall Trauma Score (CWTS), Chest Trauma Score (CTS) and RibScore (RS), but are underutilized. The purpose was to provide values of scoring systems in SSRF and NOM patients and correlate them with treatment assignment., Methods: Retrospective cohort study included 87 SSRF and 87 propensity matched NOM patients from two level-1 trauma centers. Clinical variables and score values were compared between two groups., Results: SSRF compared to NOM patients had significantly higher number of total rib fractures, displaced fractures, rates of pulmonary contusion and flail chest. RS and CTS values were significantly higher in SSRF compared to NOM patients (2.3 vs. 1.7, p = 0.001; 5.8 vs. 5.3, p = 0.005, respectively), but RFS and CWTS were similar., Conclusions: Application of scoring systems could help with patients' objective and standardized assessment and may aid in treatment decisions. RibScore was superior to other scoring systems.

Background and purpose - Knee fracture treatment burden remains unknown, impeding proper use of hospital resources. We examined 20-year trends in incidence rates (IRs) and patient-, fracture-, and treatment-related characteristics of knee fracture patients.Patients and methods - This nationwide cohort study of prospectively collected data including patients with distal femoral, patellar, and proximal tibial fractures from the Danish National Patient Registry during 1998-2017, assesses IRs of knee fractures (per 10 5 inhabitants) as well as patient-, fracture-, and treatment-related characteristics of knee fracture patients.Results - During 1998-2017, 60,823 patients (median age 55; 57% female) sustained 74,106 knee fractures. 74% of the study population had a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 0 and 18% a CCI of ≥ 2. 51% were proximal tibial fractures, 31% patellar fractures, and 18% distal femoral fractures. At the time of knee fracture, 20% patients had concomitant near-knee fractures (femur/tibia/fibula shaft/hip/ankle), 13% concomitant fractures (pelvic/spine/thorax/upper extremities), 5% osteoporosis, and 4% primary knee osteoarthritis. Over 1/3 knee fractures were surgically treated and of these 86% were open-reduction internal fixations, 9% external fixations, and 5% knee arthroplasties. The most common surgery type was proximal tibia plating (n = 4,868; 60% female). Knee fracture IR increased 12% to 70, females aged > 51 had the highest knee fracture IR, proximal tibial fracture had the highest knee fracture type IR (32) and surgically treated knee fracture IR increased 35% to 23.Interpretation - Knee fracture IRs, especially of surgically treated knee fractures, are increasing and proximal tibial fracture has the highest knee fracture type IR. Females aged > 51 and patients with comorbidity are associated with knee fracture, proximal tibial fracture, proximal tibial fracture surgery, and posttraumatic knee arthroplasty.

Background and purpose - Fractures of the distal ulna can occur in isolation or in conjunction with a distal radius fracture. They may result in incongruence and instability of the distal radioulnar joint. We investigated the incidence of distal ulna fractures, whether any fracture types were more common, and the methods of treatment used.Patients and methods - Data were collected from patients 18 years or older, treated for a fracture of the distal ulna in Östergötland, Sweden, during 2010-2012. Patients were identified in the patient registry. The fractures were classified according to the AO comprehensive classification of fractures.Results - The incidence of distal ulna fractures was 74/100,000 person-years. The most common fracture type was that of the ulnar styloid Q1 (79%), followed by the ulnar neck Q2 (11%). Rarest was ulna head fracture, type Q4 (1%). Incidental findings were a mean age of 63 years (SD 18), a concomitant distal radius fracture in 92% of the patients and that 79% were caused by falling from standing height. Internal fixation was performed in 30% of the Q2-Q6 fractures. This indicates that most were considered stable without internal fixation or stable after fixation of a concomitant radius fracture.Interpretation - Our results show that fractures of the distal ulna are not very common, and some fracture types are even rare. There seem to be no consensus on treatment.

Background: The efficacy of surgical stabilization of rib fracture (SSRF) in patients without flail chest has not been studied specifically. We hypothesized that SSRF improves outcomes among patients with displaced rib fractures in the absence of flail chest., Methods: Multicenter, prospective, controlled, clinical trial (12 centers) comparing SSRF within 72 hours to medical management. Inclusion criteria were three or more ipsilateral, severely displaced rib fractures without flail chest. The trial involved both randomized and observational arms at patient discretion. The primary outcome was the numeric pain score (NPS) at 2-week follow-up. Narcotic consumption, spirometry, pulmonary function tests, pleural space complications (tube thoracostomy or surgery for retained hemothorax or empyema >24 hours from admission) and both overall and respiratory disability-related quality of life (RD-QoL) were also compared., Results: One hundred ten subjects were enrolled. There were no significant differences between subjects who selected randomization (n = 23) versus observation (n = 87); these groups were combined for all analyses. Of the 110 subjects, 51 (46.4%) underwent SSRF. There were no significant baseline differences between the operative and nonoperative groups. At 2-week follow-up, the NPS was significantly lower in the operative, as compared with the nonoperative group (2.9 vs. 4.5, p < 0.01), and RD-QoL was significantly improved (disability score, 21 vs. 25, p = 0.03). Narcotic consumption also trended toward being lower in the operative, as compared with the nonoperative group (0.5 vs. 1.2 narcotic equivalents, p = 0.05). During the index admission, pleural space complications were significantly lower in the operative, as compared with the nonoperative group (0% vs. 10.2%, p = 0.02)., Conclusion: In this clinical trial, SSRF performed within 72 hours improved the primary outcome of NPS at 2-week follow-up among patients with three or more displaced fractures in the absence of flail chest. These data support the role of SSRF in patients without flail chest., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic, level II.

Pelvic fractures occur with high-energy trauma, and the patient's clinical status is unstable. Although a number of surgical methods for unstable pelvic fractures are available, none can achieve strong fixation with minimal invasiveness. We describe a surgical transiliac rod and screw fixation (TIF) procedure that provides minimally invasive fixation using a spinal implant for unstable pelvic ring fractures, and we retrospectively analyzed the procedure's outcomes in 27 patients with type B or C1 fractures (based on the AO/ATO classification system). Small skin incisions are made above the posterior superior iliac spines on both sides. The ilium is partially resected, and two iliac screws are inserted on each side. The spinous process of the sacral spine is then shaved, and the iliac screws are connected to 2 rods, one placed caudal to the other. Corrective manipulation is performed at the fracture site, and the rods are connected with connectors. Favorable fracture reduction, defined as a rating of 'excellent' or 'good,' was achieved in 77.8% of the patients. Transiliac rod and screw fixation (TIF) will be a useful therapeutic option for unstable pelvic ring fractures., Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Background: Combined ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures are an uncommon type of fractures. A number of different implant options are available for the management of this injury. Two-device procedures were suggested because of the higher rate of malunion by single-device treatment. However, surgical treatment using a cephalomedullary nail is still an alternative option that provides better mechanical advantage and minimal invasion. This study details the technique of treating these pattern fractures with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation II (PFNA-II) to achieve an acceptable reduction in both fracture sites., Methods: Ten cases of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures under reduction by PFNA II were included and reviewed. A saw-bone model was also utilized to perform the detailed technique of reduction and fixation of PFNA II., Results: Under the special technique by using the PFNA II, all ten cases achieved optimal reduction and alignment of both fracture sites in intra-operative fluoroscopy. There was no intra-operative complication noted. After 6 months of follow-up, radiography revealed proper alignment and well union of the fractures., Conclusions: Fixation of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures with a single construct provides advantages of good biomechanical function, minimal invasion, reduced blood loss, and less operation time when comparing to two-device fixation. Thus, if acceptable reduction could be achieved, fixation by one PFNA II was a good alternative choice for this injury pattern.

Posterior shoulder fracture-dislocations are rare. A combination of this injury with ipsilateral humeral shaft fracture is an extremely rare event. We report two cases of posterior shoulder fracture-dislocation with ipsilateral fracture shaft of humerus treated in our department. We highlight the rarity of the condition and the potential risk of recognize only the shaft fracture. We emphasize the importance of complete physical and radiological examination (x-rays and CT scan) in such cases to ensure early detection and its subsequent surgical treatment.

Background: Rib fractures are a common consequence of traumatic injury and can result in significant debilitation. Rib fixation offers fracture stabilization, resulting in improved outcomes and decreased pulmonary complications, especially in high-risk groups such as those with flail segments. However, commercial rib fixation has only recently become clinically prevalent, and we hypothesize that significant variability exists in its utilization based on injury pattern and trauma center., Methods: The Pennsylvania Trauma System Foundation database was queried for all multiple rib fracture patients occurring statewide in 2016 and 2017. Demographics including the presence of flail and the occurrence of rib fixation was abstracted. Outcomes were compared between the fixation group and all other rib fracture patients. Deidentified treating trauma center was used to elicit center-level disparities., Results: During the study period, there were 12,910 patients with multiple rib fractures, of which 135 had flail segments. 57 patients underwent rib fixation, and 10 of which had a flail segment. Compared with the nonoperative cohort, those who underwent rib fixation were younger (52.5 versus 61.5, P = 0.0009), similar in gender (68% versus 62% male, P = 0.373), and race (80% versus 86% White, P = 0.239). The rib fixation group had higher Injury Severity Scores (19.4 versus 15.4 P = 0.0011). The timing of rib fixation was most frequent within 1 wk of injury but extended out through 3 wk; the occurrence of pulmonary complications had a similar distribution. The frequency of rib fixation rates within trauma centers was not associated with rib fracture patient volume, and 37.1% of multiple rib fracture patients were cared for at centers that did not perform rib fixation., Conclusions: Rib fixation is infrequently used at trauma centers in Pennsylvania. It is used more frequently in nonflail injuries, and its use may be associated with the occurrence of pulmonary complications. Significant center-level variation exists in rib fixation rates among multiple fractured patients. A significant number of patients are cared for at centers that do not perform rib fixation. Further research is needed to illicit better-defined indications for operative fixation, and opportunities exist to further the penetrance of this practice to all trauma centers., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Fractures of the proximal and diaphyseal femur are frequently internally fixed using a fracture table. Moreover, some femoral neck fractures may be treated with total hip arthroplasty using a direct anterior approach and a traction table. Fracture and traction tables both use a boot tightly fitted to the patient's foot in order to: 1) obtain fracture reduction by traction and adequate rotation exerted on the slightly abducted or adducted extremity; or 2) adequately expose the hip joint using traction, rotation and extension to implant total hip arthroplasty components. In some instances, multiply injured patients may present with both a proximal or diaphyseal femur fracture and a diaphyseal or distal tibia or ankle fracture necessitating an ankle spanning external fixator on the same limb. Frequently, the tibia or ankle fracture has to be treated first, and standard use of the fracture or traction table may be thereafter difficult due to the external fixator construct preventing tight fitting of the boot to the patient's foot., Case Presentation: In order to address this situation, the authors describe a simple technique allowing rigid fixation of the limb with an ankle spanning external fixator to the traction or fracture table, providing accurate control of the position of the lower limb in all planes for adequate fracture reduction and fixation or total hip arthroplasty. The technique is exemplified with a clinical case., Conclusions: This technique allows an efficient way to: 1) timely stabilize diaphyseal or distal tibia or ankle fractures; and 2) subsequently use all the advantages of a fracture or traction table to adequately reduce and fix proximal or diaphyseal femur fractures, or optimally expose femoral neck fractures for total hip arthroplasty using a direct anterior approach.

Introduction: Graft fixation is critical for the successful survival of a skin graft. Conventional mechanical fixation may induce inappropriate pressure and increase wound complications. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) could be utilized to secure a skin graft and improve drainage. Limited quantitative data exist on the efficacy of NPWT for skin grafting., Objective: This retrospective study compares the efficacy and complications between NPWT and conventional mechanical fixation in skin grafts., Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent skin graft surgery from January 2015 to December 2016 at a large university hospital in southwest China were retrospectively analyzed. Characteristics, including wound pattern, skin graft type, surgical procedure, survival rate, and postoperative complication, were statistically analyzed by Pearson chi-square or Fisher's exact test., Results: A total of 186 patients were included in the study; 72 received NPWT and 114 received conventional mechanical dressing fixation after skin grafting. Overall survival rate of full-thickness skin grafts was significantly higher in the NPWT group than the dressing group (P ⟨ .01). The NPWT group showed a higher survival rate than the dressing group for each anatomic site, but only patients who had skin grafts of the hand exhibited statistically significant results., Conclusions: This study reports a quantitative analysis of the efficacy of NPWT on skin graft fixation with NPWT providing consistent pressure and better drainage than conventional mechanical fixation. In addition, the use of NPWT also could increase graft take on the hand region.

The reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA) autograft provides large volumes of autogenous graft that exhibit excellent osteogenic, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive properties. These features, combined with the relative ease of graft harvest and low donor site morbidity when compared with the gold standard iliac crest bone graft (ICBG), have made RIA autograft a viable alternative to ICBG. Some suggest RIA autograft is superior to ICBG, particularly in the setting of large segmental bone defects managed with the induced membrane technique. Although significant complications such as fracture and cortical perforation have been reported, they are preventable if proper surgical strategy and tactics are used., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Rib fractures account for a fairly high proportion of chest injuries, ranging from 55 to 80%. The most common mechanisms of injury include: traffic accident, extrusion and falls from significant heights. Besides, the surgical treatment of multiple rib fractures has been accepted by more and more medical professionals. We reported 5 clinical cases of patients with multiple rib fractures undergoing open reduction and internal fixation using 3D printing technology., Case Presentation: Retrospective analysis of 5 clinical cases of multiple rib fractures from January 2017 to August 2018 in our hospital. A preoperative CT thin slice scan was used to reconstruct the 3D model according to the scanning results, and 3D printing technology was adopted to prepare the rib model. Preoperative reconstruction of the rib's normal shape and lock plate for the shaped ribs was created according to reconstructed model. For multiple fractures especially patients with severely deformed rib shape, it is suggested to intraoperative shape directly to the metal bone plate fixed on the ribs on both ends of the fracture line, in order to establish a basic support frame. The other various fracture section can be fixed on the lock plate respectively. Postoperative chest radiographs of the 5 patients showed that the internal fixations were in good and natural shape. The thoracic contour was well formed and symmetrically with the contralateral side., Conclusion: Making the rib model and the pre-shaped titanium alloy rib locking plate using 3D printing technology, provided a more minimally invasive and precisely individualized treatment for some rib fracture operations.

Objective: The purposes of this article were to (1) compare our combined pelvic ring and acetabular fracture patients' rate of mortality and Injury Severity Score (ISS) to those of patients with isolated injuries at our center and to those with combined injuries as reported in the literature, (2) describe our treatment algorithm using the INFIX for these combination injuries, and (3) report our patients' radiographic and functional outcomes., Design: Retrospective IRB-approved case series and literature review., Setting: US Level 1 Trauma Center., Patients/participants: Thousand six hundred ninety-seven with acetabular or pelvic ring injury, 174 patients with combination pelvic ring acetabular injuries, and 39 patients with 41 acetabular injuries treated with a surgical protocol., Intervention: Pelvic ring reduction using INFIX and posterior fixation followed by acetabular reduction fixation. Anterior injury fixed with INFIX., Main Outcome: Mortality, ISS, pelvic reduction by Keshishyan index, acetabular reduction by the Matta criteria, and functional outcome by the Majeed score., Results: Mortality was 5.7% and ISS was 12.5 for 174 combined injury patients. In the 39 patients with 41 injuries, excellent pelvic reduction was found in 39, and acetabular reduction was anatomic in 25 (61%), imperfect in 12 (29%), and poor in 4 (10%). Clinically 78% of the patients had good or excellent outcome and 22% had a fair or poor outcome. Nonanatomic acetabular reduction, persistent sciatic nerve palsy, and heterotopic ossification associated with poor clinical outcome., Conclusions: Our treatment protocol resulted in excellent pelvic reduction, anatomic acetabular reduction in 61% of patients, and 78% good to excellent clinical outcome., Level of Evidence: Case series Level IV.

Objectives: To compare outcomes in patients with rib fractures (RFX) who underwent surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) to those treated nonoperatively., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: Two Level 1 Trauma Centers., Patients: One hundred seventy-four patients with multiple RFX divided into 2 groups: patients with surgically stabilized RFX (n = 87) were compared with nonoperatively managed patients in the matched control group (MCG) (n = 87)., Intervention: SSRF., Outcome Measurements: Age, sex, injury severity score, RFX, mortality, hospital length of stay (HLOS) and intensive care unit length of stay (ICULOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV), co-injuries, and time to surgery. Patients were further stratified by presence or absence of flail chest and pulmonary contusion (PC)., Results: Flail chest, displaced RFX, and PC were present significantly more often in SSRF patients compared with the MCG. Mortality was lower in SSRF group. HLOS and ICULOS were longer in SSRF group compared with the corresponding MCG patients regardless of timing to surgery (P < 0.01 for all). SSRF patients with flail chest had comparable HLOS, ICULOS, and DMV to MCG patients with flail chest (P > 0.3 for all). SSRF patients without flail chest had significantly longer HLOS and ICULOS than MCG patients without flail chest (P < 0.001 for both). Presence of PC did not affect lengths of stay., Conclusions: SSRF patients had reduced mortality compared with nonoperatively managed patients. HLOS, ICULOS, and DMV were longer in SSRF patients than in MCG. When flail chest was present, lengths of stay were comparable. PC did not seem to affect the surgical outcome., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Objectives: To investigate and assess the effectiveness of surgical fixation of rib fractures in complex traumatic chest injuries compared with traditional nonoperative management., Design: Retrospective observational comparative study., Setting: Level 1 Major Trauma Centre in North West England., Patients/participants: A total of 83 patients who were admitted urgently to our hospital after major trauma, between August 2012 and March 2015, and fulfilled the criteria for surgical fixation of their multiple rib fractures. Patients who had concomitant nonsurvivable injuries or did not consent for surgery were excluded., Intervention: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of multiple rib fractures and flail chest segments versus traditional nonoperative management., Main Outcome Measurements: The primary outcome of interest was the total hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and the incidence of respiratory complications such as hospital-acquired pneumonia, need for mechanical ventilation, and/or tracheotomy. The mortality rate was also investigated., Results: A total of 83 patients were included, 47 of these in the ORIF group and 36 in the non-ORIF group. The mean hospital LOS for patients in the non-ORIF group was 30.41 days (SD 30.1). This was markedly reduced in the ORIF group to a mean of 14.53 days (SD 11.7), with the difference being statistically significant (P < 0.01). Twenty-eight patients (77.7%) in the nonoperatively managed group required admission to the ICU compared with a significantly lower 48.9% (23 patients) in the ORIF group (P < 0.01). The incidence of respiratory complications was lower in the ORIF group but this difference was not statistically significant. The mortality rate was 2.1% for the group that was treated surgically compared with 13.9% for the conservative group (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: Surgical fixation of multiple displaced rib fractures reduced the total hospital LOS and the overall mortality in our major trauma patients and decreased the incidence of ICU admission., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Introduction: The erector spinae plane block is a newly described and effective interfascial plane block for thoracic and abdominal surgery. This case report describes a patient with multiple rib fractures undergoing ultrasound-guided continuous erector spinae plane block for analgesia., Case Report: A 37-year-old male patient was taken for surgical fixation of multiple rib fractures. At the end of the surgery, using ultrasound-guided longitudinal parasagittal orientation 3cm to the lateral aspect of the T5 spinous process and an in-plane technique, 20mL 0.25% bupivacaine was administered between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process, and a catheter was then inserted in the same plane. Before the end of surgery, 1g paracetamol and 50mg dexketoprofen were administered. Postoperative analgesia was applied with patient controlled analgesia method using 0.25% bupivacaine via the catheter. The patient's Visual Analogue Scale score at rest in the first 24h was 0. The patient was monitored for 3 days with Visual Analogue Scale<4, and the catheter was removed on postoperative day 4. No opioid requirement other than paracetamol and dexketoprofen occurred during this time. No postoperative complications were recorded., Discussion: The erector spinae plane block is an alternative to paravertebral, intercostal, epidural or other regional techniques. It may be a suitable technique in anesthesia and algology practice due to providing analgesia in the postoperative period with a catheter in the erector spinae plane., (Copyright © 2018 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Publicado por Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine whether operating on "major" vertebral fractures leads to premature abortion of surgery and/or other acute cardiopulmonary complications., Design: Retrospective review., Clinical Setting: Level 1 trauma center., Patients/participants and Intervention: We retrospectively queried our institutional Trauma Rregistry for all cases presenting with concomitant rib fractures and surgically managed vertebral fractures., Main Outcome Measurements: The main outcomes included the surgical outcome (aborted vs. successfully performed), total and Intensive Care Unit length of stay (LOS), adverse discharge, mortality, and functional outcomes., Results: We found 57 cases with concomitant segmental rib fractures and surgically managed vertebral fractures. Seven patients (12%) received a rib fixation, of which 1 received before vertebral fixation and 6 after. Importantly, 4 vertebral fixation cases (7.02%) had to be aborted intraoperatively because of the inability to tolerate prone positioning for surgery. For case-control analysis, we performed propensity score matching to obtain matched controls, that is, cases of vertebral fixation but no rib fractures. On matched case-control analysis, patients with concomitant segmental rib fractures and vertebral fractures were found to have higher Intensive Care Unit LOS [median = 3 days (Inter-Quartile Range = 0-9) versus. 8.4 days, P = 0.003], whereas total LOS, frequency of complete, incomplete or functional spinal cord injury, discharge to rehab, and discharge to nursing home were found to be similar between the 2 groups., Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that segmental rib fractures with concomitant vertebral fractures undergoing surgical treatment represent a subset of patients that may be at increased risk of intraoperative cardio-pulmonary complications and rib fixation before prone spine surgery for cases in which the neurological status is stable is reasonable., Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.