Search

Bridges are key parts of transportation networks and hence, their post-hazard condition is vital for the recovery of the regions affected by natural hazards. However, the fact that they are often subjected to more than one destructive natural hazard during their life span resulting in accumulated damage that may influence their capacity has attracted relatively little research interest, while almost no design standards take it into consideration. The multiple hazard events may be successive single events, separated by considerable time intervals (e.g. an earthquake followed by a flood event), combined or cascading multiple-hazard events (e.g, landslide after an earthquake), or even simultaneous events. The main objective of this study is to propose an effective framework for the development of multiple-hazard fragility curves of bridges considering the effect of subsequent events and taking into account different possible damage scenarios of the bridge critical components, i.e. piers, bearings and the abutment-backfill systems. In this framework, the effect of the damage level of the critical components and their interdependence on the fragility assessment for multiple events is examined and compared with the bridge fragility for single events. A pilot case study is also included in the present work, aiming to highlight the effect of the initial damage state on the final fragility estimate of a typical riverine bridge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The reliable assessment of bridge capacity is necessary in order to ensure the functionality of the roadway network under normal, or emergency operating conditions. Damage due to the interaction with the environment (e.g., corrosion of coastal reinforcement) has been observed in many cases, even in newly built interurban road networks. Therefore, the need for obtaining and including measured data in fragility assessment analysis has emerged. In line with the above, the proposed research introduces a framework for the assessment of bridges considering integrating data obtained with NDTs. The scope of NDTs is to track down the evolution damage on bridges and determine its risk of failure. The work presents a structural damage identification approach that successfully updates a digital twin of the structure. Subsequently the digital twin is used in order to determine the bridge fragility. Fiber modeling is used for creating the digital twin of the structure. Modified uniaxial material laws are applied for the fragility assessment of a deteriorated case study bridge also providing comparative assessment results for the pristine bridge, i.e. without damage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bridges are in direct interaction with the environment and thus are exposed to various natural hazards such as earthquakes and floods, that may result in severe damage and substantial direct and indirect losses. The multiple hazard events may be subsequent single events (e.g., a flood event followed by an earthquake) or combined multi‐hazard events (e.g., cascading ground failure event after an earthquake). The effect of multiple hazards on bridge fragility is related to the damage level of the bridge components and the associated failure mechanisms that may compromise the roadway network functionality. The scope of this work is to propose an approach for the multiple‐hazard assessment of bridges considering subsequent events and different damage scenarios of critical bridge components, i.e. piers, bearings and abutments. Therefore, the effect of the damage level of critical bridge components and their interdependence on the fragility assessment for subsequent hazard events is investigated. Different damage scenarios and hazard sequences are studied, providing insight into the damage mechanisms and the accumulation of damage. The approach is applied to the multiple hazard assessment of a case study typical riverine bridge in Greece and the results are comparatively discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]