Search

Background. Donor specific antibodies (DSAs) are preformed IgG antibodies with specificity against HLA molecules not shared with the donor that can lead to graft failure (GF) in the setting of mismatched HSCT. The aim of this study is to report the experience of the Spanish Group of Hematopoietic Transplant (GETH-TC) in patients with DSAs undergoing haplo-HSCT. Methods. Patients undergoing haplo-HSCT in centers from the GETH-TC from 2013 to 2021 were included in the study. DSAs were analyzed with a solid-phase single-antigen immunoassay (Luminex®); monitoring was performed prior to desensitization, prior to infusion and after infusion. Desensitization strategies used depended on center experience, immunofluorescence intensity, complement fixation and type of antibodies. Results. 59 haplo-HSCT with DSAs were performed in 57 patients in 13 centers. Characteristics of the population are shown in Table 1. 53 (93%) patients were female (91% with prior pregnancies). All patients lacked a suitable alternative donor. 51 (89%) received peripheral blood as stem cell source. Conditioning was myeloablative in 58% and all patients received post-transplant cyclophosphamide based GVHD prophylaxis; 3 (5%) patients received also ATG. 28 (49%) patients presented anti-HLA class I DSAs 22 of them with >5000MFI), 14 (25%) presented anti-HLA class II (6 with >5000MFI) and 15 (26%) presented both anti-HLA class I and II DSAs (13 with >5000MFI). Five patients did not receive desensitization treatment, 4 of them with After a median follow-up of 24 months, 2-year OS and EFS were 52% and 42%, respectively. 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse at was 14% and NRM was 41%. Cumulative incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD at day 180 was 13% and chronic GVHD was 25%. Conclusions. The use of desensitization treatment guided by DSAs intensity kinetics constitute an effective approach with high rates of engraftment for patients with DSAs in need for an haplo-HSCT lacking an alternative suitable donor, including non-malignant disorders. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bailen: Pfizer, Kite-Gilead, Gilead: Honoraria. Oarbeascoa: Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kwon: Novartis, Celgene, Gilead, Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria.

The aim of this study was to find noninvasive T-cell markers able to predict rejection or infection risk after kidney transplantation. We prospectively examined T-lymphocyte subsets after cell culture stimulation (according to CD38, CD69, CD95, CD40L, and CD25 expression) in 79 first graft recipients from four centers, before and after transplantation. Patients were followed up for one year. Patients who rejected within month-1 (n = 10) showed high pre-transplantation and week-1 post transplantation percentages of CD95(+), in CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cells (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). These biomarkers conferred independent risk for early rejection (HR:5.05, P = 0.061 and HR:75.31, P = 0.004; respectively). The cut-off values were able to accurately discriminate between rejectors and non-rejectors and Kaplan-Meier curves showed significantly different free-of-rejection time rates (P < 0.005). Patients who rejected after the month-1 (n = 4) had a higher percentage of post-transplantation CD69(+) in CD8(+) T-cells than non-rejectors (P = 0.002). Finally, patients with infection (n = 41) previously showed higher percentage of CD38(+) in CD8(+) T-cells at all post-transplantation times evaluated, being this increase more marked in viral infections. A cut-off of 59% CD38(+) in CD8(+) T-cells at week-1, week-2 and month-2 reached 100% sensitivity for the detection of subsequent viral infections. In conclusion, predictive biomarkers of rejection and infection risk after transplantation were detected that could be useful for the personalized care of kidney recipients. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.