Search

Objective: The purpose of this study was to (a) identify the prevalence and barriers of self-reported service needs in a military sample with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI), (b) evaluate the influence of the number of service needs on overall neurobehavioral functioning, and (c) examine the longitudinal trajectories of service needs over time. Method: Participants were 941 U.S. service members and veterans (SMVs) prospectively enrolled into four groups: uncomplicated mild TBI (MTBI; n = 455); complicated mild, moderate, severe, and penetrating TBI combined (STBI; n = 164); injured controls (IC, n = 138); and noninjured controls (NIC, n = 184). Participants completed a battery of neurobehavioral measures, as well as a self-reported service need interview, 12 or more month's postinjury. In addition, a longitudinal cohort (n = 553) was included using a subset of participants who had completed two or more evaluations. Results: When examining the total number of self-reported service needs, there was a greater proportion of the MTBI and STBI groups that had a higher number of service needs compared to the NIC and IC groups (p <.001). In the MTBI and STBI groups, as the number of service needs increased, worse scores were found on all neurobehavioral measures. In the longitudinal cohort, the STBI group reported the highest number of service needs that persisted or developed over time (six needs), followed by the MTBI (three needs), IC (one need), and NIC (zero need) groups. Conclusions: These findings call for the need to enhance the provision of information given to service members and veterans following TBI regarding available services. Impact and Implications: Following a traumatic brain injury, a substantial proportion of service members and veterans (SMVs) have an ongoing need to access a variety of services for improving health/medical problems, cognitive concerns, and overall mental well-being. However, many of these SMVs report that they cannot access the services they need, experience significant barriers for accessing the services they need, or have ongoing service needs for problems that either persist or develop over time. These findings are concerning for all SMVs, but have particular implications for active-duty service members and warfighter readiness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Blood-based biomarkers have received considerable attention for their diagnostic and prognostic value in the acute and postacute period following traumatic brain injury (TBI). The purpose of this study was to examine whether blood-based biomarker concentrations within the first 12 months of TBI can predict neurobehavioral outcome in the chronic phase of the recovery trajectory. Setting: Inpatient and outpatient wards from 3 military medical treatment facilities. Participants: A total of 161 service members and veterans classified into 3 groups: (a) uncomplicated mild TBI (MTBI; n = 37), (b) complicated mild, moderate, severe, penetrating TBI combined (STBI; n = 46), and (c) controls (CTRL; n = 78). Design: Prospective longitudinal. Main Measures: Participants completed 6 scales from the Traumatic Brain Injury Quality of Life (ie, Anger, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Headaches, and Cognitive Concerns) within 12 months (baseline) and at 2 or more years (follow-up) post-injury. Serum concentrations of tau, neurofilament light, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and UCHL-1 at baseline were measured using SIMOA. Results: Baseline tau was associated with worse anger, anxiety, and depression in the STBI group at follow-up (R 2 = 0.101-0.127), and worse anxiety in the MTBI group (R 2 = 0.210). Baseline ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCHL-1) was associated with worse anxiety and depression at follow-up in both the MTBI and STBI groups (R 2Δ = 0.143-0.207), and worse cognitive concerns in the MTBI group (R 2Δ = 0.223). Conclusions: A blood-based panel including these biomarkers could be a useful tool for identifying individuals at risk of poor outcome following TBI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Key Points: Questions: Do US government officials and their family members involved in anomalous health incidents (AHIs) differ from control participants with respect to clinical, biomarker, and research assessments? Findings: In this exploratory study that included 86 participants reporting AHIs and 30 vocationally matched control participants, there were no significant differences in most tests of auditory, vestibular, cognitive, visual function, or blood biomarkers between the groups. Participants with AHIs performed significantly worse on self-reported and objective measures of balance, and had significantly increased symptoms of fatigue, posttraumatic stress disorder, and depression compared with the control participants; 24 participants (28%) with AHIs presented with functional neurological disorders. Meaning: In this exploratory study, there were no significant differences between individuals reporting AHIs and matched control participants with respect to most clinical, research, and biomarker measures, except for self-reported and objective measures of imbalance; symptoms of fatigue, posttraumatic stress, and depression; and the development of functional neurological disorders in some. Importance: Since 2015, US government and related personnel have reported dizziness, pain, visual problems, and cognitive dysfunction after experiencing intrusive sounds and head pressure. The US government has labeled these anomalous health incidents (AHIs). Objective: To assess whether participants with AHIs differ significantly from US government control participants with respect to clinical, research, and biomarker assessments. Design, Setting, and Participants: Exploratory study conducted between June 2018 and July 2022 at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, involving 86 US government staff and family members with AHIs from Cuba, Austria, China, and other locations as well as 30 US government control participants. Exposures: AHIs. Main Outcomes and Measures: Participants were assessed with extensive clinical, auditory, vestibular, balance, visual, neuropsychological, and blood biomarkers (glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light) testing. The patients were analyzed based on the risk characteristics of the AHI identifying concerning cases as well as geographic location. Results: Eighty-six participants with AHIs (42 women and 44 men; mean [SD] age, 42.1 [9.1] years) and 30 vocationally matched government control participants (11 women and 19 men; mean [SD] age, 43.8 [10.1] years) were included in the analyses. Participants with AHIs were evaluated a median of 76 days (IQR, 30-537) from the most recent incident. In general, there were no significant differences between participants with AHIs and control participants in most tests of auditory, vestibular, cognitive, or visual function as well as levels of the blood biomarkers. Participants with AHIs had significantly increased fatigue, depression, posttraumatic stress, imbalance, and neurobehavioral symptoms compared with the control participants. There were no differences in these findings based on the risk characteristics of the incident or geographic location of the AHIs. Twenty-four patients (28%) with AHI presented with functional neurological disorders. Conclusions and Relevance: In this exploratory study, there were no significant differences between individuals reporting AHIs and matched control participants with respect to most clinical, research, and biomarker measures, except for objective and self-reported measures of imbalance and symptoms of fatigue, posttraumatic stress, and depression. This study did not replicate the findings of previous studies, although differences in the populations included and the timing of assessments limit direct comparisons. This study assesses whether participants with anomalous health incidents (AHIs) differ significantly from US government control participants with respect to clinical, research, and biomarker assessments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Blast Exposure Threshold Survey (BETS) is a recently developed and promising new self-report measure of lifetime blast exposure (LBE). However, there are no studies that have examined the psychometric properties of the BETS, which currently limits its clinical utility. The purpose of this study was to examine the convergent and discriminant validity of the BETS by comparing the BETS Generalized Blast Exposure Value (GBEV) to six variables hypothesized to be associated with LBE (i.e., single-item LBE, combat exposure, years in the military, number of combat deployments, and military occupation specialty [MOS]) and three variables hypothesized not to be associated with LBE (i.e., age at the time of injury, estimated pre-morbid Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient [FSIQ], and resilience). Participants were 202 United States service members and veterans prospectively enrolled from three military medical treatment facilities (68.7%) and via community recruitment initiatives (31.3%). Participants completed the BETS, Combat Exposure Scale (CES), Deployment Risk and Resiliency Inventory-2 Combat Experiences (DRRI-2 CE), Traumatic Brain Injury-Quality of Life Resilience scale, and a brief structured interview. For some analyses, participants were classified into two blast risk MOS groups: high (n = 89) and low (n = 94). The BETS GBEV was not significantly correlated with all three non-blast related variables (rs = 0.01 to rs = -0.12). In contrast, GBEV was significantly (p < 0.001) associated with all blast-related variables; single-item LBE (rs = 0.76), CES (rs = 0.58), number of combat deployments (rs = 0.53), DRRI-2 CE (rs = 0.48), and high blast risk MOS (r = 0.36, medium effect size). However, a stronger relationship was found between the blast-related variables and three modified GBEV scores when excluding some small weapons categories; single-item LBE (rs = 0.80–0.82), CES (rs = 0.64–0.67), number of combat deployments (rs = 0.56), DRRI-2 CE (rs = 0.51–0.53), and high blast risk MOS (r = 0.42–0.49, medium-large effect size). This is the first study to examine the psychometric properties of the BETS. Overall, these results offer support for the convergent and discriminant validity of the BETS. In order to ensure that the BETS can be confidently used as a valid and reliable measure of LBE, more research is needed to further examine the psychometric properties of the test, particularly with regard to the establishment of test-retest reliability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to extend previous research by examining the relationship between lifetime blast exposure and neurobehavioral functioning after mild TBI (MTBI) by (a) using a comprehensive measure of lifetime blast exposure, and (b) controlling for the influence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Participants were 103 United States service members and veterans (SMVs) with a medically documented diagnosis of MTBI, recruited from three military treatment facilities (74.8%) and community-based recruitment initiatives (25.2%, e.g., social media, flyers). Participants completed a battery of neurobehavioral measures 12 or more months post-injury (Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory, PTSD-Checklist PCLC, TBI-Quality of Life), including the Blast Exposure Threshold Survey (BETS). The sample was classified into two lifetime blast exposure (LBE) groups: High (n = 57) and Low (n = 46) LBE. In addition, the sample was classified into four LBE/PTSD subgroups: High PTSD/High LBE (n = 38); High PTSD/Low LBE (n = 19); Low PTSD/High LBE (n = 19); and Low PTSD/Low LBE (n = 27). The High LBE group had consistently worse scores on all neurobehavioral measures compared with the Low LBE group. When controlling for the influence of PTSD (using ANCOVA), however, only a handful of group differences remained. When comparing measures across the four LBE/PTSD subgroups, in the absence of clinically meaningful PTSD symptoms (i.e., Low PTSD), participants with High LBE had worse scores on the majority of neurobehavioral measures (e.g., post-concussion symptoms, sleep, fatigue). When examining the total number of clinically elevated measures, the High LBE subgroup consistently had a greater number of clinically elevated scores compared with the Low LBE subgroup for the majority of comparisons (i.e., four to 15 or more elevated symptoms). In contrast, in the presence of clinically meaningful PTSD symptoms (i.e., High PTSD), there were no differences between High versus Low LBE subgroups for all measures. When examining the total number of clinically elevated measures, however, there were meaningful differences between High versus Low LBE subgroups for those comparisons that included a high number of clinically elevated scores (i.e., six to 10 or more), but not for a low number of clinically elevated scores (i.e., one to five or more). High LBE, as quantified using a more comprehensive measure than utilized in past research (i.e., BETS), was associated with worse overall neurobehavioral functioning after MTBI. This study extends existing literature showing that lifetime blast exposure, that is largely subconcussive, may negatively impact warfighter brain health and readiness beyond diagnosable brain injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]