Search

Study aim: Manual circular staplers are widely used in colorectal surgery; however, limited literature exists examining complications related to circular anastomoses when such devices are used. The present study evaluated the incidence, predictors, and economic burden of circular anastomotic complications in left-sided colorectal reconstructions involving manual circular staplers. Materials and methods: Patients aged ≥18 years who underwent hemicolectomy, low anterior resection, or sigmoidectomy between 1 October 2016 and 31 December 2018 were identified from the Premier Healthcare Database. Manual circular stapler use was identified from hospital administrative billing records. Circular anastomotic complications were defined as a composite endpoint of multiple circular stapler use (proxy for stapler failure) or other circular anastomotic complications (anastomotic leak, bleeding, device/surgical complications, infection, and transfusion). Multivariable analyses were used to model the associations between circular anastomotic complications and total hospital costs, length of stay, operating room time, and 30-, 60-, and 90-day readmission rates. Results: A total of 13,167 patients met the study criteria, of whom 2,984 (22.7%) had circular anastomotic complications. Predictors of circular anastomotic complications included age, procedure type, provider region, and select patient comorbidities. As compared with those who did not, patients who suffered circular anastomotic complications had significantly higher adjusted total hospital costs ($26,924 vs. $18,748; p<.0001), length of stay (7.79 vs. 4.99 days; p<.0001), operating room time (280 vs. 239 min; p<.0001), non-home discharge status (9.63% vs. 4.61%; p<.0001), and all-cause readmission at 30 days (12.2% vs. 8.7%; p<.0001), 60 days (16.0% vs. 11.6%; p<.0001), and 90 days (18.5% vs. 13.4%; p<.0001). Limitations: The present study is limited by the observational nature and potential for measurement error that is inherent to administrative healthcare databases. Conclusions: In this analysis of patients undergoing left-sided colorectal reconstructions involving a manual circular stapler, circular anastomotic complications were associated with adverse economic consequences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Circular staplers perform a critical function for creation of anastomoses in colorectal surgeries. Powered stapling systems allow for reduced force required by surgeons to fire the device and may provide advantages for creating a secure anastomosis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of a novel circular powered stapler in a post-market setting, during left-sided colectomy procedures.Materials and Methods: Consecutive subjects underwent left-sided colorectal resections that included anastomosis performed with the ECHELON CIRCULAR™ Powered Stapler (ECP). The primary endpoint was the frequency in which a stapler performance issue was observed. Secondary endpoints included evaluation of ease of use of the device via a surgeon satisfaction questionnaire, and monitoring/recording of procedure-related adverse events (AEs).Results: A total of 168 anastomoses were performed with the ECP. Surgical approaches included robotic-assisted (n = 74, 44.0%), laparoscopic (n = 71, 42.3%), open (n = 20, 11.9%), and hand-assisted minimally invasive (n = 3, 1.8%) procedures. There were 22 occurrences of device performance issues in 20 (11.9%) subjects during surgery. No positive intraoperative leak tests were observed, and only 1 issue was related to a procedure-related AE or surgical complication, which was an instance of incomplete surgical donut necessitating re-anastomosis. Postoperative anastomotic leaks were experienced in 4 (2.4%) subjects. Clavien-Dindo classification of all AEs indicated that 92.0% were Grades I or II. Participating surgeons rated the ECP as easier to use compared to previously used manual circular staplers in 85.7% of procedures.Conclusion: The circular powered stapler exhibited few clinically relevant performance issues, an overall favorable safety profile, and ease of use for creation of left-sided colon anastomoses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A narrow-profile powered vascular stapler (PVS) was developed to provide superior access and precise staple placement in thoracic procedures. The objective of this study was to determine if the PVS would yield an equivalent rate of hemostatic interventions compared with standard of care (SOC) staplers in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy. A randomized, controlled, multicenter study was conducted comparing PVS with SOC staplers in lobectomies performed for non–small cell lung cancer. The primary performance endpoint was the incidence of intraoperative hemostatic interventions, and the primary safety endpoint was the frequency of postoperative bleeding-related interventions. A total of 98 subjects participated in the SOC group and 103 in the PVS group. Rates of intraoperative hemostatic interventions were 5.3% and 8.3% for the SOC and PVS groups, respectively. These rates were not statistically different (P = 0.137), although the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval for the difference in intervention rates between PVC and SOC exceeded a predefined 3% criterion for equivalence. Simple compressions were performed more frequently in the PVS subjects, which accounted for the higher intervention rate in this group. Postoperative interventions for bleeding were required in one SOC subject (1.0%) and one subject from the PVS group (0.9%). Procedure-related adverse events occurred in 21 (21.9%) SOC subjects and 23 (21.9%) PVS subjects, with no adverse events related to use of the study devices. The PVS exhibited similar overall safety and effectiveness to SOC staplers in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]