Search

During the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth delivery of psychological care services expanded to meet the needs of people with cancer. This study examined psychologists' attitudes toward using telehealth during the pandemic peak in a tertiary oncology hospital. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten psychologists who used telehealth to deliver psychological services. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify themes in the interview data. Themes identified: (1) increased uptake and attendance of psychology sessions was due to greater accessibility of services; (2) clinicians reported ease of communication and building of rapport when using telehealth; and (3) clinicians perceived differences in the psychotherapeutic process when sessions were delivered via telehealth compared to in-person. Clinicians expressed high satisfaction with delivering telehealth psychological support for oncology patients. Implications for Psychosocial Providers: Oncology services that are considering developing or expanding a telehealth psychology service can facilitate this by ensuring a reliable technological platform and providing training and/or support to staff and patients. Clinicians should also use their clinical judgment to decide if a patient is appropriate for telehealth-delivered psychological care or if a mix of modalities is more ideal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Masculinities have been explored in men with testicular cancer (TC), though limited contemporary research is available on traditional masculine norms important to masculine self‐perception. The purpose of this research was to explore the discourse of TC experience in relation to masculine self‐perception. Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted consisting of semi‐structured interviews with 21 men. Men were aged between 31 and 47 (Mage = 35.7). Most men were diagnosed with Stage 1 cancer (66.6%), all men had finished active treatment and time since diagnosis ranged from 17.3 to 71.8 months (M = 47.2). Independent coding was conducted by two researchers and was refined in coding meetings with authors. Themes were developed in a predominantly deductive manner, and analysis of themes was undertaken using a reflexive analysis approach. Results: Traditional masculine norms showed differing relationships to masculine self‐perception. Two main themes were identified [1] Maintained or enhanced masculine self‐perception and [2] threats to masculine self‐perception. Subthemes demonstrated that maintaining emotional control, strength and 'winning' was important to men, and reduced physical competencies (i.e., strength, sexual dysfunction, virility) challenged self‐perception. Strict adherence to traditional norms in response to threatened self‐perception related to psychological distress. Conclusion: Leveraging traditionally masculine norms such as physical strength and control and developing flexible adaptations of masculinities should be encouraged with men with TC to retain self‐perception and potentially enable better coping. Masculine self‐perception of gay/bisexual men may centre around sexual functioning, though further research is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Psychological distress is common in men with testicular cancer (TC), and masculinities may work to explain this. This study aimed to compare masculinities and distress in TC and healthy control (HC) populations and explore relationships between correlates of distress (psychological flexibility and coping style) and masculinities in TC. Methods: A cross‐sectional, online survey was completed by 92 men with TC (Mage = 34.8) and 90 HC (Mage = 30.7). Measures included psychological distress (Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Depression/Anxiety, fear of cancer recurrence inventory‐short form), masculinities (gender role conflict‐short form, inventory of subjective masculinity experiences/subjective masculinity stress scale, masculinity in chronic disease inventory), coping style (mini‐mental adjustment to cancer) and psychological flexibility (comprehensive assessment of acceptance commitment therapy). Linear regressions were conducted to compare groups and analyse associations. Results: There were no differences in masculinities or psychological distress between populations (all p > 0.05 and all Cohen's d < 0.20), except for subjective masculine stress and restrictive affectionate behaviour between men. For men with TC, restrictive affection/emotion, conflicts between family/work and subjective masculine stress were associated with psychological distress (rs 0.21–0.58). Optimistic action was negatively associated with depression/anxiety, helplessness/hopelessness coping (rs −0.27 to −0.42) and positively associated with psychological flexibility (r = 0.35). Conclusions: Masculinities are implicated in psychological distress in men with TC. Psychological flexibility as well as leveraging masculine beliefs (e.g., optimistic action) may be modifiable targets to reduce distress in men with TC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to investigate the mechanisms of a combined brief cognitive behavioral plus bright light therapy (CBT-I+Light) in women receiving chemotherapy. Women (N = 101) were randomly assigned to CBT-I+Light or treatment as usual plus relaxation audios (TAU+). Participants completed sleep diaries and wore an actigraph during the 6-week intervention period. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed at baseline, mid-point (week 3), and later (week 6). Cognitive (i.e., dysfunctional sleep beliefs, pre-sleep cognitions, and arousal) and behavioral (i.e., time in bed awake and day-to-day out-of-bedtime variability) mechanisms were examined. Cognitively, both groups declined significantly in overall dysfunctional sleep beliefs from pre- to post-intervention (both p<.04); however, they did not differ on sleep-related beliefs nor pre-sleep cognitions and arousal at post-intervention (both p>.50). Dysfunctional beliefs sleep expectations subscale was lower in CBT-I+Light versus TAU+ (p=.01). Behaviorally, CBT-I+Light reported less overall time in bed awake after the start of the intervention (p<.05) and significantly less time in bed during the morning until the final week of the intervention period. Out-of-bedtime day-to-day variability was lower in the CBT-+Light vs TAU+ at the final intervention day. Mechanisms of CBT-I+Light during chemotherapy remain to be shown. Our results suggest that changes in behavioral mechanisms may be associated with sleep improvements within this cohort. Future studies should assess the role of additional mechanisms (e.g., sleep effort) within larger samples. Whilst intervention brevity is important, more potent interventions may be required to achieve robust changes in target mechanisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients presenting for major surgery with low cardiorespiratory fitness (deconditioning) and other modifiable risk factors are at increased risk of postoperative complications. This study investigated the feasibility of delivering prehabilitation in high-risk patients scheduled for major abdominal cancer surgery. Methods: Eligible patients in this single-center cohort study included patients with poor fitness (objectively assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing, CPET) scheduled for elective major abdominal cancer surgery. Patients were recruited to participate in a prehabilitation program that spanned up to 6 weeks pre-operatively and comprised aerobic and resistance exercise training, breathing exercise, and nutritional support. The primary outcome assessed pre-specified feasibility targets: recruitment >70%, retention >85%, and intervention adherence >70%. Secondary outcomes were assessed for improved pre-operative functional status and health-related quality of life and for postoperative complications. Results: Eighty-two (34%) out of 238 patients screened between April 2018 and December 2019 were eligible for recruitment. Fifty (61%) patients (52% males) with a median age of 71 (IQR, 63–77) years participated in the study. Baseline oxygen consumption the at anaerobic threshold and at peak exercise (mean±SD: 9.8±1.8 and 14.0±2.9 mL/kg/min, respectively) confirmed the deconditioned state of the study cohort. The retention rate within the prehabilitation program was 84%, with 42 participants returning for repeat CPET testing. While >60% of participants preferred to do home-based prehabilitation, adherence to the intervention was low—with only 12 (28%) and 15 (35%) of patients having self-reported compliance >70% with their exercise prescriptions. Conclusion: Our prehabilitation program in high-risk cancer surgery patients did not achieve pre-specified targets for recruitment, retention, and self-reported program adherence. These findings underpin the importance of implementation research and strategies for the prehabilitation programs in major surgery. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620000073909) retrospectively registered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Sleep difficulties are a significant issue experienced by up to 58% of people diagnosed with ovarian cancer. The gold-standard treatment for sleep difficulties is Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT). Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (PMCC) Can- Sleep Program is the first Australian program that specifically targets sleep difficulties among adults with cancer. This program was found to be acceptable to clinicians and patients, feasible to deliver and demonstrated benefits on sleep outcomes. Adapting Can-Sleep in a community setting for people with ovarian cancer may offer a low-cost evidence-based treatment for sleep difficulties. Aim The current project involves a partnership between PMCC and Ovarian Cancer Australia (OCA) in the adaption of the Can-Sleep program to treat sleep difficulties in people with an ovarian cancer diagnosis. Methods From February 2024, approximately 60 people with a diagnosis of ovarian cancer and receiving support from OCA will be screened using the Insomnia Severity Index and Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Those with identified sleep difficulties without obstructive sleep apnoea or restless legs syndrome will be offered a stepped care program. Step one is CBT self-management and coaching. Participants will then be re-screened at 5 weeks and those with ongoing sleep difficulties will be offered step 2, group CBT. Acceptability and feasibility of the OCA Can-Sleep Program will be assessed via evaluation surveys. Results The rate and type of sleep difficulties experienced by ovarian cancer survivors will be presented. Preliminary data of referrals made into each of the interventions will also be discussed as well as pilot data on efficacy and early learnings from the evaluation surveys. Conclusion We seek to better understand areas of success, identify areas for improvement and contribute to the evidence-base regarding screening and treating of sleep difficulties in the ovarian cancer population, and determine the feasibility and acceptability of the Can-Sleep program as an approach to care in a community setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]