Search

Background: Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome leading to progressive functional impairment. How cachexia affects the treatment course of chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer has not been well understood. Methods: This is an exploratory, retrospective, observational cohort study using the Japanese medical claims database from Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd. The study population included patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in whom first-line FOLFIRINOX (FFX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) was initiated between October 1, 2018, and September 30, 2020. In this study, we defined patients with cancer cachexia as those who had a weight loss of ≥ 5% in the preceding 6 months. The primary outcome was time-to-treatment failure (TTF). The observation period was six months from the initiation of first-line FFX or GnP treatment. Results: A total of 1897 patients (421 patients into the cachexia group; 1476 patients into the non-cachexia group) were analyzed in this study. The median TTF was 121 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 94–146) in the cachexia group and 143 days (95% CI 134–152) in the non-cachexia group. The hazard ratio for TTF of the cachexia versus non-cachexia group was 1.136 (95% CI 0.979–1.319). The median number of doses was two doses fewer in the cachexia group than in the non-cachexia group for both FFX and GnP. Conclusion: Cancer cachexia was suggested to be associated with shorter TTF and a reduced number of doses in patients with pancreatic cancer who received first-line FFX or GnP treatment. Clinical Trial Registration clinicaltrials.jp: UMIN000045820. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In Japan, the population aged 65 years and above accounts for 29% of the total population. Furthermore, the number of cancer patients among the elderly is increasing. Geriatric oncology is a discipline that deals with appropriate care for elderly cancer patients based on their characteristics. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology considers education, treatment, research, and partnership building areas of significance and priority for policy goals. In Japan, the Third Term of the Basic Plan to Promote Cancer Control is an initiative to improve the infrastructure and health services involved in cancer care. Content related to "cancer in the elderly" was added to establish guidelines for treating cancer in the elderly. Thus far, "Clinical Practice Guidelines of Cancer Drug Therapies for the Elderly" have been published. With the increasing age of the population, social security expenditures will increase substantially after the fiscal year 2022. Reforms to social security systems, such as pensions, medical care, and nursing care, are underway. It is important to enhance cooperation between oncology and geriatrics and to support cooperative systems among families and medical professionals to promote geriatric oncology. Since the working-age population and the total population have begun to decline, Japan is facing many challenges. As a leader of a super-aging society, Japan has the potential to share its experience on a global scale and address potential long-term outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer continues to remain dismal, even though numerous trials have been conducted to establish more effective therapies in Japan and throughout the world. Recent advances in treatment have been characterized by the use of novel combinations of conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies. Especially in Japan, S-1 has become one of the most widely used cytotoxic agents for the treatment of pancreatic cancer, after clinical evidence was established of the survival benefit offered by this drug for patients with resectable or unresectable pancreatic cancer. Unfortunately, with the exception of erlotinib, no targeted treatment strategies have been approved for pancreatic cancer. However, following an increase in interest in drug development in recent years, proactive attempts have been made to develop new therapeutic strategies, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, multi-agent combination chemotherapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, and therapies with new targeted agents or immuno-oncologic agents for patients with pancreatic cancer bearing specific gene mutations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cancer cachexia is characterized by weight loss and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Anamorelin (ONO‐7643; ANAM) is a novel and selective ghrelin receptor agonist that improves appetite, lean body mass (LBM), body weight, and anorexia. Methods: This multicenter, open‐label, single‐arm study investigated the efficacy and safety of 100 mg anamorelin in 50 Japanese patients with advanced and unresectable gastrointestinal (colorectal, gastric, or pancreatic) cancer. ANAM was administered once daily over 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients that maintained or gained LBM over the course of the study. Secondary endpoints included changes in LBM, body weight, quality of life (QoL), and nutritional status biomarkers. Results: The proportion of patients who responded to treatment was 63.3% (95% CI, 48.3%‐76.6%), with a least square mean ± SE change in LBM and body weight from baseline of 1.89 ± 0.36 kg and 1.41 ± 0.61 kg, respectively. Appetite‐related questions on the QoL questionnaire showed that ANAM improved appetite. Adverse events occurred in 79.6% of patients, and the most common treatment‐related adverse events were increased γ‐glutamyl transpeptidase (8.2%), diabetes mellitus (6.1%), hyperglycemia (6.1%), and prolonged QRS complex (6.1%). Conclusions: ANAM improved anorexia and patients' nutritional status, resulting in rapid increases in LBM and body weight in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer who had cancer cachexia. ANAM treatment was well tolerated over 12 weeks. ANAM is a potential clinically beneficial pharmacotherapeutic option for patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer who have cancer cachexia. The receipt of 100 mg anamorelin increases lean body mass and improves symptoms of anorexia and nutritional status in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer who have cancer cachexia. Anamorelin is well tolerated in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Patients with RAS-positive tumors respond poorly to chemotherapies and have a few treatment options. Salirasib is an oral RAS inhibitor that competitively blocks the membrane association of RAS proteins. The aim of this phase I multiple-ascending-dose clinical trial was to investigate the safety and pharmacokinetics of Salirasib in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors and to explore its efficacy.Methods: Salirasib was started at a dose of 100-mg twice-daily and escalated to a maximum of 1000-mg twice-daily from days 1 to 21 of a 28-day regimen. The pharmacokinetics was evaluated on days 1 and 21. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the trial. Patients with stable disease or better repeated the dosing regimen.Results: A total of 21 patients received Salirasib. Among 14 patients tested, 4 had KRAS mutations. Cmax and AUCinf were maximal at 800 mg. No maximum tolerable dose was discerned, as no DLT was observed in any dosing group. The most frequently observed AEs were gastrointestinal disturbances, including diarrhea, abdominal pain, and nausea. No AEs led to discontinuation. All patients completed the first regimen and 11 patients repeated the regimen (median: 2 cycles; range: 1-13). Patients with KRAS mutations showed median progression-free survival of 227 days (range: 79-373).Conclusion: Salirasib was safe and well tolerated in Japanese patients, and 800-mg twice-daily is recommended for phase II trials. Although the number of participants with KRAS mutations was limited, the remarkably long progression-free period warrants further investigation.Clinical Trial Registration: JAPIC Clinical Trials Information; JapicCTI-121751. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The ' Guideline on the Use of New Anticancer Drugs for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma' was prepared by the Study Group on New Liver Cancer Therapies established by the ' Research Project on Emergency Measures to Overcome Hepatitis' under the auspices of the Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant. The Guideline brings together data collected by the Study Group on the use and incidence of adverse events in 264 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated using sorafenib and in 535 patients with advanced HCC treated using miriplatin at 16 participating institutions up until 22 December 2010, as well as referring to the published studies, academic presentations, and reports from the private sector. The aim of this Guideline is to facilitate understanding and current thinking regarding the proper usage of new anticancer drugs towards actual use in therapy. In terms of the format, the Guideline presents 'clinical questions' on issues pertaining to medical care, makes 'recommendations' on diagnosis and treatment in response to each of these clinical questions, and provides a rationale for these recommendations in the form of 'scientific statements'. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/purpose: Complications from biliary drainage in biliary tract cancer (BTC) may influence the relative dose intensity of chemotherapy or increase adverse events during chemotherapy. BT22 was a randomized phase II trial, the results of which were consistent with those of a phase III trial in non-Japanese that demonstrated the effectiveness of gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination therapy (GC) in BTC. The purpose of this exploratory analysis of the BT22 study was to identify the possible effects of biliary drainage on the efficacy and safety of GC or gemcitabine monotherapy (G). Patients and Methods: The 83 BTC patients who received GC or G in BT22 were retrospectively analysed in two subgroups dependent upon whether biliary drainage was performed before study entry. Efficacy and safety of treatment (GC vs. G) were compared in these two groups. Results: The GC arm had a higher 1-year survival rate and longer median survival time (MST) than the G arm independent of prior biliary drainage. Patients in the drainage subgroup developed cholangitis more frequently, however, the frequency of grade 3/4 adverse events did not differ between the treatment regimens with/without drainage. Conclusions: Biliary drainage before chemotherapy did not affect the therapeutic efficacy or tolerability of chemotherapy using G or GC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: There had been no standard chemotherapy established for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) until 2009, when the combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine (GC) was adopted as a first line standard chemotherapy option based on the results from two randomized studies: ABC-02, a UK investigator-initiated trial and the largest randomized phase III study in this tumor type with 410 patients; and BT22, a Japanese, industry-sponsored, randomized phase II study with 83 patients. In this review, investigators from both studies collaborated to compare protocols, patient characteristics, and outcomes of both studies including sub-analyses of study results. Although both studies showed GC combination therapy to be more effective than monotherapy, a detailed comparison revealed disparities between efficacy and safety end-points between the studies, which did not necessarily arise from different populations but from differences in protocol design. This review provides clinicians with insights for advanced BTC clinical study design and interpretation of historical studies. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

It is necessary to establish effective chemotherapy to improve the survival of patients with biliary tract cancer, because most of these patients are unsuitable candidates for surgery, and even patients undergoing curative surgery often have recurrence. Recently, the combination of cisplatin plus gemcitabine was reported to show survival benefits over gemcitabine alone in randomized clinical trials conducted in the United Kingdom and Japan. Thus, the combination of cisplatin plus gemcitabine is now recognized as the standard therapy for unresectable biliary tract cancer. One of the next issues that need to be addressed is whether molecular targeted agents might also be effective against biliary tract cancer. Although some targeted agents have been investigated as monotherapy for first-line chemotherapy, none were found to exert satisfactory efficacy. On the other hand, monoclonal antibodies such as bevacizumab and cetuximab have also been investigated in combination with a gemcitabine-based regimen and have been demonstrated to show promising activity. Furthermore, clinical trials using new targeted agents for biliary tract cancer are also proposed. This cancer is a relatively rare and heterogeneous tumor consisting of cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma. Therefore, a large randomized clinical trial is necessary to confirm the efficacy of chemotherapy, and international collaboration is important. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The purpose of this study was to elucidate the treatment efficacy and safety of gemcitabine monotherapy, and to identify prognostic factors in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer receiving this therapy. Method: The data of 100 patients with advanced biliary tract cancer who were treated with gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy were reviewed retrospectively. Results: One patient showed complete response (1.0%) and 6 patients showed partial response (6.0%), yielding an overall response rate of 7.0%. The main grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia and leukopenia. The median survival, 1-year survival rate and progression-free survival were 7.3 months, 21.6% and 3.1 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified a performance status of 0-1, serum C-reactive protein level of <3.0 mg/dl, serum carcinoembryonic antigen level of <10 ng/ml and serum albumin level of ≥3.5 g/dl as factors independently associated with a favorable prognosis. Conclusions: Gemcitabine monotherapy showed modest efficacy with manageable toxicity in patients with biliary tract cancer. These results could be useful as reference data for optimizing treatment strategies and planning future clinical trials in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Asia has a disproportionate share of the world's burden of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the highly regarded clinical practice guidelines and recommendations for the design and conduct of clinical trials for HCC largely reflect Western practice. In order to design mutually beneficial international clinical trials of promising targeted therapies, it is imperative to understand how the aetiology, staging and treatment of HCC differ between Asian and Western countries. Our group, comprising experts in oncology and hepatology from countries that constitute the Eastern Asian region, convened to compare and contrast our current practices, evaluate potential compliance with the clinical trial recommendations, and offer suggestions for modifications that would enhance international collaboration. Here, we describe the results of our discussions, including recommendations for appropriate patient stratification based on potentially important differences in HCC aetiology, identification of practices that may confound interpretation of clinical trial outcomes (traditional Chinese medicine; antivirals that target hepatitis B virus; heterogeneous embolization procedures), suggestions for utilizing a common staging system in study protocols, recognition that sorafenib usage is limited by financial constraints and potentially increased toxicity in Asian patients, and expansion of patient populations that should be eligible for initial clinical trials with new agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 followed by chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer received four cycles of induction chemotherapy consisting of 30-min intravenous infusions of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and oral S-1 40 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14 of a 21-day cycle. Those without disease progression received chemoradiotherapy of 30 Gy in ten fractions with 250 mg/m2 of gemcitabine on days 1 and 8. A total of 20 patients were treated. Median follow-up time was 431 days (range 133–1,014 days). Four cycles of induction chemotherapy were completed in 18 patients, and 16 patients received chemoradiotherapy, which was completed without delay in all. Grade 3–4 toxicities associated with induction chemotherapy were neutropenia (50%); anemia (20%); thrombocytopenia (10%); febrile neutropenia (5%); nausea (10%); anorexia (10%); and vomiting, fatigue, dehydration, stomatitis, and rash (5%). Grade 3–4 toxicities among those receiving chemoradiotherapy were neutropenia (13%) and anemia (6%). Median progression-free survival was 8.1 months. Median overall survival was 14.4 months, with a 1-year survival rate of 54.2%. The regimen of induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 followed by chemoradiotherapy used in the present study demonstrated promising activity in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Further consideration of radiation schedule and duration of induction chemotherapy is required to enhance the efficacy of this strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to clarify the safety and efficacy of combination chemotherapy of uracil-tegafur (UFT) and doxorubicin (UFD regimen), and to identify the prognostic factors in patients with unresectable advanced biliary tract cancer who received systemic chemotherapy. Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed, measurable biliary tract cancer, including intrahepatic or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, and ampullary cancer, who were not suitable candidates for surgery, were eligible for the study. Patients received oral UFT at 300 mg/m2 per day divided into two doses on days 1–14 and intravenous doxorubicin at 30 mg/m2 on day 1. This cycle was repeated every 21 days. The relationship between the patient characteristics and the prognosis was examined. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the prognostic factors associated with survival. Sixty-one patients from 12 institutions were enrolled in the late phase II study between April 2005 and March 2006. Of the 61 patients, 4 patients had partial responses, for an objective response rate of 6.6% (95% CI: 1.8–15.9%); 28 patients had stable disease, 27 had progressive diseases, and 2 patients were not evaluated. The median progression-free survival was 1.6 months, and the overall median survival time was 6.5 months. In the 85 patients who received this UFD chemotherapy in previous and late phase II studies, multivariate analysis revealed the ECOG performance status 1 ( P = 0.001), gallbladder as the primary cancer site ( P = 0.014), T-factor 4 of the TNM classification ( P = 0.035), and elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase levels ( P = 0.043) as being associated with a significantly shorter survival. Combination chemotherapy of UFT and doxorubicin had minimum activity against advanced biliary tract cancer. Performance status was identified as the most important prognostic factor in patients who received systemic chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A pilot phase II study showed S-1 monotherapy to be safe and active against biliary tract cancer (BTC). We, therefore, conducted a multicenter phase II study to evaluate the antitumor effect and safety of S-1 in previously untreated patients with advanced BTC. Eligible patients had pathologically proven, unresectable adenocarcinoma with no prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Patients received S-1 orally at 80 mg/m2 total daily dose divided b.i.d. for 28 days followed by 14 days of rest. Of the 41 enrolled patients, 40 were assessable. The primary tumor sites were as follows: gallbladder ( n = 20), extrahepatic bile duct ( n = 15), and the ampulla of Vater ( n = 5). One patient (2.5%) achieved a complete response, 13 patients (32.5%) had partial responses, 17 patients (42.5%) had no change, 7 patients (17.5%) had progressive disease, and 2 patients (5.0%) were not evaluable. The overall objective response rate was 35.0%. The median overall survival (median OS) was 9.4 months, and the median time to progression was 3.7 months. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities included fatigue (7.5%), anorexia (7.5%) and T-Bil elevation (7.5%). Significant antitumor activity combined with a mild toxicity profile was observed. This monotherapy warrants further evaluation in a randomized study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Despite various effective local treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), some patients do not meet the treatment criteria because of extrahepatic metastases or macroscopic vascular invasion at the time of their diagnosis. Furthermore, many patients treated with successful local treatments develop recurrences after treatment. Although these patients receive systemic treatment including chemotherapy, HCC is generally recognized as a chemo-resistant tumor. Recently, new molecular targets have been confirmed and various targeted agents are now being investigated for the treatment of HCC. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is frequently expressed in human hepatoma cells, and EGF may be one of the mitogens that are needed for the growth of hepatoma cells. HCC is generally hypervascular, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promotes HCC development and metastasis. Various inhibitors targeting EGFR and/or VEGF, VEGF receptor (VEGFR) have been developed as treatments of HCC. In phase-II studies of these growth factor inhibitors, the response rates are relatively low; however, high rates of disease control, enabling a good time to progression, have been achieved. Recently, a randomized phase III trial of sorafenib versus placebo conducted in patients with advanced HCC demonstrated the beneficial effects of this drug on the time-to-progression and overall survival of the patients, and the drug could become established as the standard chemotherapeutic agent for advanced HCC. Further clinical trials using biologic agents are warranted to prolong the survival in HCC patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Radiotherapy is often used to treat patients with unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The present study examines the nature and frequency of adverse events with respect to liver function in such patients after radiotherapy. Methods: Forty-six patients with HCC who underwent radiotherapy were retrospectively examined. Radiotherapy was applied using coplanar 2–3-beam arrangements to a target dose of 50 Gy/5 weeks. The adverse hepatic events were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Scheme during the acute phase and the late phase by following the patients for up to 1 year. The influence on survival by adverse hepatic events and other factors was analyzed. Results: The full irradiation dose of 50 Gy was given to 40 patients (87.0%). Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was observed in 18 (39.1%) within 3 months after radiotherapy and in 11 (33.3%) of 33 thereafter, respectively. The most frequent and serious adverse events were hyperbilirubinemia, hypoalbuminemia, and ascites. The independent adverse prognostic factors for survival were portal vein tumor thrombus ( P = 0.0012), tumor response ( P = 0.011), acute adverse hepatic event ( P = 0.012), and late adverse hepatic event ( P = 0.015). Conclusions: Hypoalbuminemia, hyperbilirubinemia, and ascites were important hepatic adverse events that developed after applying radiotherapy to treat advanced HCC. These adverse events seriously affected survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A previous randomized trial showed gemcitabine was superior to 5-fluorouracil in overall patient survival. However, the incremental improvement in survival was minimal. It is 2.5 years since gemcitabine has become available for the treatment of pancreatic cancer in clinical practice in Japan. The current study was conducted to examine whether treatment outcomes have changed since the introduction of gemcitabine therapy.Ninety-one consecutive patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with systemic chemotherapy at the National Cancer Center Hospital East were surveyed. Patients admitted before April 2001 received 5-fluorouracil, and those admitted subsequently received gemcitabine. The patients were divided into the gemcitabine group (n = 50) and the non-gemcitabine group (n = 41), and these groups were compared for five outcomes, objective response rate, non-progressive disease rate, carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 response rate, actual survival time, and difference between estimated and observed survivals. The estimated survival time was determined using the prognostic index reported in the previous study.Except for the objective response rate, the four other outcomes in the gemcitabine group were significantly superior to those in the non-gemcitabine group. The frequency of non-progressive disease, CA19-9 response, and favorable prognosis compared with the estimated survival, were 58%, 22%, and 60%, respectively, in the gemcitabine group, and 22%, 6%, 30%, respectively, in the non-gemcitabine group. The median survival time in the gemcitabine and non-gemcitabine group was 5.73 and 2.87 months, respectively.It is suggested that there was a definite improvement in pancreatic cancer treatment after gemcitabine was introduced. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To clarify the role of chemotherapy for advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC). Methods: We reviewed 89 GBC patients: 21 admitted before 1997 were treated with a combination of cisplatin, epirubicin, and 5-fluorouracil (CEF); 25, admitted subsequently, received a combination of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and mitomycin (FAM), and the remaining 43, ineligible for these trials, received supportive care. We investigated the relation between pretreatment clinical variables and long-term survival in these 89 subjects, and analyzed whether chemotherapy could favor longer survival. Results: There were no significant differences in survival time between the chemotherapy groups, whereas the response rate to the CEF regimen was 4-fold higher than to the FAM regimen (32 vs. 8%). Subgroup analysis suggested that chemotherapy favored longer survival in patients with a performance status (PS) of 0 or 1, but not in patients with a PS of 2. Cox regression analysis suggested a significant hazard reduction by chemotherapy in patients with a PS of 0 or 1, but not in patients with a PS of 2. Conclusions: GBC patients with poor PS should not be treated with chemotherapy at present. It is essential to design good clinical trials and develop more effective chemotherapy regimens. Copyright © 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 70-year-old male was admitted to hospital for a liver tumor. We diagnosed that hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 1.5 cm in diameter, by several examinations. We performed ultrasonically guided radio-frequency ablation (RFA). Ultrasonography (US) 9 days post-therapy revealed a cystic lesion 1.5 cm in diameter. Color Doppler US revealed color imaging throughout the lesion and dynamic computed tomography (CT) demonstrated an area of hyperattenuation. Intrahepatic pseudoaneurysm was diagnosed. On 14 days post-therapy, no color signals on color Doppler US or enhanced areas on CT were seen. We submit that pseudoaneurysm should be recognized as a complication of radio-frequency ablation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract A 22-year-old man visited our hospital (National Cancer Center Hospital East) complaining of fatigue and anorexia. A laboratory investigation demonstrated a biochemical ‘picture’ of obstructive jaundice. An abdominal CT showed a low density mass in the retropancreatic area with multiple enlarged periportal lymph nodes. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed active ulceration on the dorsal wall of the descending part of the duodenum, and histopathology of the biopsy specimen revealed an ulcer with reactive inflammatory cell infiltration; no tumor cells were detected. The possibility of neoplasm had been ruled out by the use of CT and angiography. The jaundice recovered spontaneously and the abdominal mass gradually decreased in size. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography showed no evidence of pancreatic disease; however, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography showed a choledocho-duodenal fistula. This patient showed hypersensitivity against the tuberculin skin test and Mycobacterium tuberculosis was successfully detected in gastric juice by using a polymerase chain reaction method and culture. Biopsy samples obtained from the duodenal ulcer at the second upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed chronic inflammation with an epithelioid granuloma, suggesting tuberculosis. We thus diagnosed this case as a duodenal tuberculosis with a choledocho-duodenal fistula. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no report available of duodenal tuberculosis being the cause of a choledocho-duodenal fistula. © 2001 Blackwell Science Asia Pty Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cancer cachexia is characterized by weight loss and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Anamorelin (ONO-7643; ANAM) is a novel and selective ghrelin receptor agonist that improves appetite, lean body mass (LBM), body weight, and anorexia.Methods: This multicenter, open-label, single-arm study investigated the efficacy and safety of 100 mg anamorelin in 50 Japanese patients with advanced and unresectable gastrointestinal (colorectal, gastric, or pancreatic) cancer. ANAM was administered once daily over 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients that maintained or gained LBM over the course of the study. Secondary endpoints included changes in LBM, body weight, quality of life (QoL), and nutritional status biomarkers.Results: The proportion of patients who responded to treatment was 63.3% (95% CI, 48.3%-76.6%), with a least square mean ± SE change in LBM and body weight from baseline of 1.89 ± 0.36 kg and 1.41 ± 0.61 kg, respectively. Appetite-related questions on the QoL questionnaire showed that ANAM improved appetite. Adverse events occurred in 79.6% of patients, and the most common treatment-related adverse events were increased γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (8.2%), diabetes mellitus (6.1%), hyperglycemia (6.1%), and prolonged QRS complex (6.1%).Conclusions: ANAM improved anorexia and patients' nutritional status, resulting in rapid increases in LBM and body weight in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer who had cancer cachexia. ANAM treatment was well tolerated over 12 weeks. ANAM is a potential clinically beneficial pharmacotherapeutic option for patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer who have cancer cachexia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Systemic chemotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, to improve the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer. Unresectable pancreatic cancer can be classified into three categories: metastatic, locally advanced, and hereditary pancreatic cancers. Furthermore, the second-line chemotherapy is required to prolong the survival. The combined regimens of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GEM plus nab-PTX) have been recognized as the standard of care for advanced pancreatic cancer. However, the consensus of selection of the first-line chemotherapy still remains. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between FOLFIRINOX and GEM plus nab-PTX are ongoing for locally advanced and metastatic disease in Japan, respectively. Hereditary pancreatic cancer, especially associated with BRCA mutations, is responsive to platinum-containing regimens and/or poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. It is becoming more important to examine the presence/absence of BRCA mutations to select the appropriate treatment strategy for individual patients. Although some S-1-based regimens have been investigated in the second-line treatment after GEM-based chemotherapy in Japan, no regime demonstrated survival benefit. Nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus FF has been established as the standard of care in the second-line treatment in a global phase III trial (NAPOLI-1). A randomized phase II trial comparing FF plus nal-IRI with FF alone was also conducted in Japan to examine the efficacy and safety of the FF plus nal-IRI in Japanese patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti‐cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte antigen‐4 and anti‐programmed death‐1 antibodies are effective against malignant tumors. However, they induce unique adverse events known as immune‐related adverse events. Hypophysitis is one of the most frequent immune‐related adverse events of anti‐cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte antigen‐4 therapies. However, there have been few reports describing the pathological findings of hypophysitis induced by anti‐programmed death‐1 antibodies. The present case is the first autopsy case of hypophysitis induced by nivolumab monotherapy, an anti‐programmed death‐1 antibody. Pathologically, lymphocytes infiltrated the anterior lobe of the pituitary gland, and the number of pituitary cells, especially adrenocorticotropic hormone‐positive cells, decreased. However, necrosis and remarkable fibrosis were not observed. Immunohistologically, some pituitary cells expressed programmed death‐ligand 1. Lymphocytes were predominantly CD8‐positive T cells, and CD68‐positive macrophages and CD20‐positive B‐cells were also observed. IgG and C4d were deposited on pituitary cells, but IgG4 (a subclass of nivolumab) was not detected. These findings indicate that type IVc and type II hypersensitivity mechanisms may occur in hypophysitis induced by anti‐programmed death‐1 antibodies and that the inflammatory mechanisms underlying hypophysitis induced by anti‐programmed death‐1 and anti‐cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte antigen‐4 antibodies are different. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patient profiles suitable for long-term lenvatinib treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) are yet to be fully understood. This post-hoc analysis aimed to identify such patient characteristics and explore the impact of treatment duration and relative dose intensity (RDI) on treatment outcomes. The data were obtained from 703 patients in a multicenter, prospective cohort study in Japan. Lenvatinib-naïve patients with uHCC were enrolled between July 2018 and January 2019 and were followed up for 12 months. Moreover, patients were dichotomized using the median treatment duration into the longer- (≥177 days; n = 352) or shorter-treatment (<177 days; n = 351) groups. The longer-treatment group often had better performance status, lower Child-Pugh score and better modified albumin-bilirubin grade than the shorter treatment group (p<0.05 for all). The objective response rate (47.6% vs. 28.2%; p<0.001) and disease control rate (92.4% vs. 60.2%; p<0.001) were both significantly higher in the longer-treatment groups than in the shorter-treatment groups. The proportion of patients with any adverse drug reactions was generally similar between the two treatment groups. Within the longer-treatment group, the disease control rate was high regardless of dose modification (i.e., RDI <100% vs. ≥100% during the initial 177 days) (91.2% vs. 98.0%). In conclusion, patients with longer treatment tended to have better overall conditions. Lenvatinib dose modifications at the physician's discretion, considering the balance between effectiveness and safety, may contribute to the long-term treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The global phase 3 NAPOLI -1 trial of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit from using liposomal irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV) after treatment with gemcitabine (GEM) compared to 5-FU/LV alone. However, the efficacy and safety of this regimen in older patients are not well studied. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study to compare the therapeutic efficacy of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV between older and younger patients with cutoff ages of 70 and 75 years, respectively. We included patients with a prior history of one or more GEM-based regimens for locally advanced or metastatic PDAC and were treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV. Results: Of the 115 patients, 54 (47.0%) and 24 (20.9%) were aged ≥ 70 and ≥ 75 years, respectively. The median OS and progression-free survival (PFS) of the entire cohort were 8.5 and 3.6 months, respectively. No significant differences were observed in OS and PFS hazard ratios using age cutoffs of 70 (P = 0.90 and 0.99, respectively) and 75 (P = 0.90 and 0.76, respectively) years. Additionally, no significant differences were found in the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) between patients aged ≥ 70 and < 70 years or those aged ≥ 75 and < 75 years. Other than hematological toxicity, no trAEs higher than Grade 4 were observed in either age group. Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for patients with PDAC are not significantly different for those aged ≥ 70 years compared to younger patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Biliary tract cancers, which arise from the intrahepatic or extrahepatic bile ducts and the gallbladder, generally have a poor prognosis and are rising in incidence worldwide. The standard-of-care treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer is chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin. Because most biliary tract cancers have an immune-suppressed microenvironment, immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy is associated with a low objective response rate. We aimed to assess whether adding the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab to gemcitabine and cisplatin would improve outcomes compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. KEYNOTE-966 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done at 175 medical centres globally. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older; had previously untreated, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer; had disease measurable per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1; and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo, both administered intravenously every 3 weeks (maximum 35 cycles), in combination with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks; no maximum duration) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks; maximum 8 cycles). Randomisation was done using a central interactive voice-response system and stratified by geographical region, disease stage, and site of origin in block sizes of four. The primary endpoint of overall survival was evaluated in the intention-to-treat population. The secondary endpoint of safety was evaluated in the as-treated population. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04003636. Between Oct 4, 2019, and June 8, 2021, 1564 patients were screened for eligibility, 1069 of whom were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (pembrolizumab group; n=533) or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (placebo group; n=536). Median study follow-up at final analysis was 25·6 months (IQR 21·7–30·4). Median overall survival was 12·7 months (95% CI 11·5–13·6) in the pembrolizumab group versus 10·9 months (9·9–11·6) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·83 [95% CI 0·72–0·95]; one-sided p=0·0034 [significance threshold, p=0·0200]). In the as-treated population, the maximum adverse event grade was 3 to 4 in 420 (79%) of 529 participants in the pembrolizumab group and 400 (75%) of 534 in the placebo group; 369 (70%) participants in the pembrolizumab group and 367 (69%) in the placebo group had treatment-related adverse events with a maximum grade of 3 to 4. 31 (6%) participants in the pembrolizumab group and 49 (9%) in the placebo group died due to adverse events, including eight (2%) in the pembrolizumab group and three (1%) in the placebo group who died due to treatment-related adverse events. Based on a statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin without any new safety signals, pembrolizumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin could be a new treatment option for patients with previously untreated metastatic or unresectable biliary tract cancer. Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The fifth version of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hepatocellular Carcinoma was revised by the Japan Society of Hepatology, according to the methodology of evidence‐based medicine and partly to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system, which was published in October 2021 in Japanese. In addition to surveillance–diagnostic and treatment algorithms, a new algorithm for systemic therapy has been created, as multiple drugs for hepatocellular carcinoma can be currently selected. Here, new or revised algorithms and evidence on which the recommendations are based are described. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Fluorouracil, leucovorin (5FU/LV), and nanoliposomal-irinotecan (nal-IRI) combination therapy has been established as the second-line treatment for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Oxaliplatin with 5FU/LV (FOLFOX) is often used as a subsequent treatment, although its efficacy and safety are yet to be fully elucidated. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX as a third- or later-line treatment for patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Methods: We conducted a single-centre, retrospective study that enrolled 43 patients who received FOLFOX after failure of gemcitabine-based regimen followed by 5FU/LV + nal-IRI therapy between October 2020 and January 2022. FOLFOX therapy consisted of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2), levo-leucovorin calcium (200 mg/m2) and 5-FU (2400 mg/m2) every 2 weeks per cycle. Overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response, and adverse events were evaluated. Results: At the median follow-up time of 3.9 months in all patients, the median overall survival and progression-free survival were 3.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1–4.8) and 1.3 months (95% CI, 1.0–1.5), respectively. Response and disease control rates were 0 and 25.6%, respectively. The most common adverse event was anaemia in all grades followed by anorexia; the incidence of anorexia and grades 3 and 4 was 21 and 4.7%, respectively. Notably, grades 3–4 peripheral sensory neuropathy was not observed. Multivariable analysis revealed that a C-reactive protein (CRP) level of > 1.0 mg/dL was a poor prognostic factor for both progression-free survival and overall survival: hazard ratios were 2.037 (95% CI, 1.010–4.107; p = 0.047) and 2.471 (95% CI, 1.063–5.745; p = 0.036), respectively. Conclusion: FOLFOX as a subsequent treatment after failure of second-line treatment with 5FU/LV + nal-IRI is tolerable, although its efficacy is limited, particularly in patients with high CRP levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

S-1 has shown promising efficacy with a mild toxicity profile in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether adjuvant S-1 improved overall survival compared with observation for resected biliary tract cancer. This open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial was conducted in 38 Japanese hospitals. Patients aged 20–80 years who had histologically confirmed extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder carcinoma, ampullary carcinoma, or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in a resected specimen and had undergone no local residual tumour resection or microscopic residual tumour resection were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo observation or to receive S-1 (ie, 40 mg, 50 mg, or 60 mg according to body surface area, orally administered twice daily for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of rest for four cycles). Randomisation was performed by the minimisation method, using institution, primary tumour site, and lymph node metastasis as adjustment factors. The primary endpoint was overall survival and was assessed for all randomly assigned patients on an intention-to-treat basis. Safety was assessed in all eligible patients. For the S-1 group, all patients who began the protocol treatment were eligible for a safety assessment. This trial is registered with the University hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000011688). Between Sept 9, 2013, and June 22, 2018, 440 patients were enrolled (observation group n=222 and S-1 group n=218). The data cutoff date was June 23, 2021. Median duration of follow-up was 45·4 months. In the primary analysis, the 3-year overall survival was 67·6% (95% CI 61·0–73·3%) in the observation group compared with 77·1% (70·9–82·1%) in the S-1 group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·69, 95% CI 0·51–0·94; one-sided p=0·0080). The 3-year relapse-free survival was 50·9% (95% CI 44·1–57·2%) in the observation group compared with 62·4% (55·6–68·4%) in the S-1 group (HR 0·80, 95% CI 0·61–1·04; two-sided p=0·088). The main grade 3–4 adverse events in the S-1 group were decreased neutrophil count (29 [14%]) and biliary tract infection (15 [7%]). Although long-term clinical benefit would be needed for a definitive conclusion, a significant improvement in survival suggested adjuvant S-1 could be considered a standard of care for resected biliary tract cancer in Asian patients. The National Cancer Center Research and the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This phase 1b trial evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of S-1, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combination therapy (S-IROX) as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). Patients aged 20–75 years with APC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were eligible to receive escalating doses of S-1 (60 or 80 mg m2·day) on days 1–7, fixed doses of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) biweekly, and escalating doses of irinotecan (150, 165, or 180 mg/m2) once every 2 weeks. In the dose-escalation cohort, a 3 + 3 design was used to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and explore the recommended dose (RD). A dose-expansion cohort was added to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination. This trial was registered at UMIN-CTR (UMIN000012054). Approximately 47 patients were enrolled, of whom 45 were eligible for the analysis. The MTD was not determined, but the RD was determined to be dose level 1 based on a review of data from each level. Among the 45 patients, the ORR was 51.1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 35.8–66.3%]. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.1–8.8 months) and 15.8 months (95% CI, 9.8–20.8 months), respectively. Common adverse events included neutropenia, elevated liver enzyme levels, diarrhoea, and nausea. The S-IROX regimen showed promising efficacy with manageable toxicities in Japanese patients with APC. A randomised phase 2/3 trial comparing S-IROX, mFOLFIRINOX, and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel is currently ongoing (jRCTs031190009). • Phase 1b trial of S-1, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in pancreatic cancer. • The RD was S-1 80 mg/m2, irinotecan 150 mg/m2, and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2. • The ORR was 51.1%, and PFS and OS were better than those of the historical FOLFIRINOX. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cancer cachexia is a syndrome characterized by anorexia and decreased body weight. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of anamorelin, an orally active, selective ghrelin receptor agonist, in patients with cancer cachexia and a low body mass index (BMI). Methods: This multicenter, open‐label, single‐arm study enrolled Japanese patients with non–small cell lung cancer or gastrointestinal cancer with cancer cachexia (BMI < 20 kg/m2, involuntary weight loss > 2% in the last 6 months, and anorexia). Patients were administered 100 mg of anamorelin once daily for up to 24 weeks. The primary end point was a composite clinical response (CCR) at 9 weeks, which was defined as an increase in body weight of ≥5% from the baseline, an increase of ≥2 points in the score of the 5‐item Anorexia Symptom Scale of the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy, and being alive. Results: One hundred two patients were eligible and enrolled. The means and standard deviations for age and BMI were 71.0 ± 8.2 years and 17.47 ± 1.48 kg/m2, respectively. The CCR rate at 9 weeks was 25.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.3%‐35.3%), which met the primary end point with a lower 95% CI exceeding the prespecified minimum of 8%. Improvements in body weight and anorexia were durable and were accompanied by improvements in patients' global impression of change for appetite/eating‐related symptoms and overall condition. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 37 of 101 treated patients (36.6%), with the most common being glycosylated hemoglobin increases, constipation, and peripheral edema. Conclusions: Anamorelin improved body weight and anorexia‐related symptoms in patients with cancer cachexia and a low BMI with durable efficacy and favorable safety and tolerability. Lay Summary: Anamorelin is a drug that stimulates appetite and promotes weight gain.This clinical trial was aimed at determining its efficacy and safety in Japanese cancer patients with a low body mass index and cachexia, a syndrome associated with anorexia and weight loss.Anamorelin was found to improve body weight and anorexia‐related symptoms in these patients, and these effects were durable for up to 24 weeks. Moreover, anamorelin was generally well tolerated.These findings suggest that anamorelin is a valuable treatment option for patients with cancer cachexia and a low body mass index. This single‐arm trial is aimed at investigating the efficacy and safety of anamorelin in Japanese patients with cancer cachexia and a low body mass index. Anamorelin improves body weight and anorexia‐related symptoms with durable efficacy and favorable safety and tolerability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is inappropriate to assess the direct effects of treatment on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by locoregional therapies, such as radiofrequency ablation or transarterial chemoembolization. Therefore, establishment of response evaluation criteria solely devoted to HCC is needed in clinical practice, as well as in clinical trials of HCC treatment, such as systemic therapies, which cause necrosis of the tumor. Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer of the Liver (RECICL) was revised in 2021 by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan based on the 2019 version of RECICL, which was commonly used in Japan. The major revised points of the RECICL 2021 is inclusion of RECIST version 1.1 and modified RECIST as response evaluation criteria in systemic therapy for HCC. We hope this new treatment response criteria, RECICL, proposed by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan will benefit the HCC treatment response evaluation in the setting of daily clinical practice and clinical trials as well, not only in Japan, but also internationally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the response rate, survival, and adverse effects of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) using cisplatin in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). Methods: Twenty-five patients of advanced HCC with PVTT in the main or first branch, having no prior history of chemotherapy, measurable lesions, adequate liver and renal function, and adequate bone marrow reserve, were enrolled. Cisplatin was administered at the dose of 65 mg/m via the proper hepatic artery. Treatment was repeated every 4-6 weeks for a maximum of six courses until the appearance of evidence of tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: The median number of treatments was 3 (range 1-6). Among the 25 enrolled patients, complete response was achieved in 1 (4 %) patient and partial response in 6 (24 %), corresponding to a response rate of 28 % (95 % CI 12-49 %). The median progression-free and overall survival times and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates in the enrolled patients were 3.6 and 7.6 months and 40.3, 36.0, 20 %, respectively. Four of the seven patients who showed complete or partial response survived for more than 3 years. The main grade 3/4 non-hematological adverse events of this treatment were elevation of the serum aspartate aminotransferase (44 %) and alanine aminotransferase (24 %). Conclusion: HAIC with cisplatin exerts moderate activity with mild toxicity in advanced HCC patients with PVTT. Especially, markedly prolonged survival can be expected in patients who respond to this treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Single-agent nivolumab showed durable responses, manageable safety, and promising survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the phase 1-2 CheckMate 040 study. We aimed to investigate nivolumab monotherapy compared with sorafenib monotherapy in the first-line setting for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.Methods: In this randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial done at medical centres across 22 countries and territories in Asia, Australasia, Europe, and North America, patients at least 18 years old with histologically confirmed advanced hepatocellular carcinoma not eligible for, or whose disease had progressed after, surgery or locoregional treatment; with no previous systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma, with Child-Pugh class A and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1, and regardless of viral hepatitis status were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive voice response system to receive nivolumab (240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks) or sorafenib (400 mg orally twice daily) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall survival assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This completed trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02576509.Findings: Between Jan 11, 2016, and May 24, 2017, 743 patients were randomly assigned to treatment (nivolumab, n=371; sorafenib, n=372). At the primary analysis, the median follow-up for overall survival was 15·2 months (IQR 5·7-28·0) for the nivolumab group and 13·4 months (5·7-25·9) in the sorafenib group. Median overall survival was 16·4 months (95% CI 13·9-18·4) with nivolumab and 14·7 months (11·9-17·2) with sorafenib (hazard ratio 0·85 [95% CI 0·72-1·02]; p=0·075; minimum follow-up 22·8 months); the protocol-defined significance level of p=0·0419 was not reached. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (1 [<1%] of 367 patients in the nivolumab group vs 52 [14%] of patients in the sorafenib group), aspartate aminotransferase increase (22 [6%] vs 13 [4%]), and hypertension (0 vs 26 [7%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in 43 (12%) patients receiving nivolumab and 39 (11%) patients receiving sorafenib. Four deaths in the nivolumab group and one death in the sorafenib group were assessed as treatment related.Interpretation: First-line nivolumab treatment did not significantly improve overall survival compared with sorafenib, but clinical activity and a favourable safety profile were observed in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Thus, nivolumab might be considered a therapeutic option for patients in whom tyrosine kinase inhibitors and antiangiogenic drugs are contraindicated or have substantial risks.Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb in collaboration with Ono Pharmaceutical. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The largest burden of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lies in Asia, secondary to hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Improved survival with sorafenib has fostered new research but many challenges remain in designing clinical trials. The disease, its management, and populations affected by it are heterogeneous worldwide and within Asia. An expert conference of Eastern Asian oncologists and hepatologists was convened to foster consensus in clinical trial design. The panel identified key areas that need to be addressed to facilitate clinical trials in Asia. Stratification by viral etiology is desirable within Asia and by region in global trials. Antiviral therapy should also be considered as a stratification factor and incorporated into HCC management in trials. The panel agreed that histological diagnosis is not required for trial entry and that Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging is acceptable for trials as long as portal hypertension can be better defined with standardized methodology. Consensus in treatment must be sought to allow multi-national trials and it must be recognized that first-line sorafenib is not largely feasible in Asia. Finally, Asian nations must be urged to participate in clinical trials, many of which are ongoing, to advance new treatment options in this challenging disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gemcitabine monotherapy or gemcitabine-containing combination chemotherapy is the standard first-line therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer. After disease progression, there is no standard regimen available. In a previous phase II trial, S-1 has been reported to show considerable efficacy, achieving a response rate of 37.5% in chemo-naïve patients with pancreatic cancer. This study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of S-1 in patients with gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer. Eligibility criteria were histologically proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma with confirmation of progressive disease while receiving gemcitabine-based first-line chemotherapy, 20–74 years of age, Karnofsky performance status of 80–100 points, with measurable metastatic lesions, adequate hematological, renal and liver functions, and written informed consent. S-1 was administered orally at 40 mg/m2 twice daily for 28 days with a rest period of 14 days as one course. Administration was repeated until the appearance of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint of this study was an objective response, and secondary endpoints included toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival, as well as clinical benefit response in symptomatic patients. Forty patients from two institutions were enrolled between September 2004 and November 2005. The most common adverse reactions were fatigue and anorexia, although most of those adverse reactions were tolerable and reversible. One patient developed grade 3 pneumonitis without neutropenia and recovered with appropriate antibiotic treatment. Although no complete response was seen, partial response was obtained in six patients (15, 95% confidence interval, 3.9–26%). Stable disease was noted in 17 patients (43%), and progressive disease in 15 patients (38%). Out of 19 evaluable patients, a clinical benefit response was observed in four patients (21%). The median PFS was 2.0 months, and the median survival time was 4.5 months with a 1-year survival rate of 14.1%. S-1 as monotherapy had marginal anti-tumor activity with tolerable toxicity in patients with gemcitabine refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although the results of randomized controlled trials for locally advanced pancreatic cancer conducted between 1969 and 1988 demonstrated a survival advantage for concurrent radiotherapy and bolus 5-fluorouracil (FU) injection, the prognosis of patients with this disease remains very poor. In an attempt to improve patient outcome after chemoradiotherapy, various clinical trials for this disease have been conducted in Japan. These trials were designed to evaluate novel chemotherapy regimens combined with conventional radiotherapy, or intensive radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy. After gemictabine was shown to yield a better survival outcome than 5-FU in patients with advanced disease, this drug was investigated as a chemotherapeutic agent and/or radiosensitizer for locally advanced pancreatic cancer in a number of trials. S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine derivative that appears promising for the treatment of metastatic disease, is also being intensively evaluated in Japan for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In this review, we summarize recent treatment strategies that are being used in Japan with the goal of establishing a new standard therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study evaluated the antitumor effect and safety of S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative, in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Chemo-naive patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and measurable metastatic lesions were enrolled. S-1 was administered orally twice daily after meals at a dose of 80, 100, or 120 mg/day for body surface areas (BSAs) of less than 1.25 m2, between 1.25 m2 and less than 1.5, or 1.5 m2 or greater, respectively, for 28 consecutive days, followed by a 14-day rest. Fifteen (37.5%) of 40 patients responded to treatment, including 1 complete response and 14 partial responses. The median time to progression and the overall survival time were 3.7 months (95% confidence interval, 2.2–5.6 months) and 9.2 months (95% confidence interval, 7.5–10.8 months), respectively. The major adverse events were anorexia, fatigue, hemoglobin reduction, nausea and pigmentation change, although most were tolerable and reversible. Although disseminated intravascular coagulation occurred in two patients, the condition resolved with anticoagulant therapy. S-1 is an effective and well-tolerated drug. The effectiveness of this drug should be confirmed in a phase III study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: UGT1A1 *28 and *6 polymorphism is associated with reduced enzyme activity and severe toxicities of irinotecan, especially in patients with homozygous or heterozygous for UGT1A1*28 or *6 polymorphism for both UGT1A1*28 and *6 (double-variant-type of UGT1A1 polymorphism, UGT1A1-DV). FOLFIRINOX is one of the standard treatments for metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC). The optimal dose of irinotecan as a component of the FOLFIRINOX has not been established yet for patients with UGT1A1-DV.Patients and Methods: Advanced PC patients with UGT1A1-DV who had received at least one cycle of FOLFIRINOX from December 2013 to March 2016 were collected retrospectively conducted at multicenter in Japan. We evaluated the patient characteristics, efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX and investigate the optimal initial dose of irinotecan in Japanese advanced PC patients with UGT1A1-DV.Results: A total of 31 patients were enrolled. Grade 4 neutropenia was seen more frequently (67%; 4/6) in patients who had received irinotecan at an initial dose of  ≥ 150 mg/m2 than in those who had received the drug at an initial dose of  ≤ 120 mg/m2 (20%; 5/24). The response rate (RR) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients given irinotecan of  ≤ 120 mg/m2 were 21.4% and 8.1 months, respectively, which were consistent with previous report for patients without UGT1A1-DV.Conclusion: Based on our findings, we recommend that in Japanese advanced PC patients with UGT1A1- DV treated with FOLFIRINOX, irinotecan be administered at an initial dose of  ≤ 120 mg/m2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) rearrangement is expected to be a novel therapeutic target in advanced/recurrent biliary tract cancer (BTC). However, efficient detection and the exact frequency of FGFR2 rearrangements among patients with advanced/recurrent BTC have not been determined, and the clinical characteristics of FGFR2 rearrangement-positive patients have not been fully elucidated. We aimed to determine the frequency of FGFR2 rearrangement-positive patients among those with advanced/recurrent BTC and elucidate their clinicopathological characteristics. Methods: Paraffin-embedded tumor samples from formalin-fixed surgical or biopsy specimens of patients with advanced/recurrent BTC were analyzed for positivity of FGFR2 rearrangement by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). RNA sequencing was performed on samples from all FISH-positive and part of FISH-negative patients. Results: A total of 445 patients were enrolled. FISH was performed on 423 patients (272 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), 83 patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PCC), and 68 patients with other BTC). Twenty-one patients with ICC and four patients with PCC were diagnosed as FGFR2-FISH positive. Twenty-three of the 25 FISH-positive patients (20 ICC and 3 PCC) were recognized as FGFR2 rearrangement positive by targeted RNA sequencing. Younger age (≤ 65 years; p = 0.018) and HCV Ab- and/or HBs Ag-positivity (p = 0.037) were significantly associated with the presence of FGFR2 rearrangement (logistic regression). Conclusions: FGFR2 rearrangement was identified in ICC and PCC patients, and was associated with younger age and history of hepatitis viral infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cabozantinib in Japanese patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had progressed following one or two lines of systemic therapy including sorafenib. An exploratory evaluation in sorafenib-naïve patients was performed. Methods: In this open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial, patients received oral cabozantinib 60 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at Week 24. Secondary endpoints included PFS, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR, best response of complete/partial response), disease control rate (DCR, objective response or stable disease) and safety. Results: Thirty-four patients received cabozantinib across 17 centers (prior sorafenib cohort, n = 20; sorafenib-naïve cohort, n = 14). PFS rate at 24 weeks was 59.8% [90% confidence interval (CI) 36.1–77.2%] in the prior sorafenib cohort, 16.7% (90% CI 4.0–36.8%) in the sorafenib-naïve cohort and 40.1% (90% CI 24.8–55.0%) overall. Median PFS was 7.4 months for the prior sorafenib cohort, 3.6 months for the sorafenib-naïve cohort, and 5.6 months overall. OS rate at 6 months was 100.0%, 78.6% and 91.1%, respectively; DCR was 85.0%, 64.3% and 76.5%, respectively. The ORR was 0.0% for both cohorts. All patients required dose modifications due to adverse events, the most common of these were palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome and diarrhea. Three patients (8.8%) discontinued due to adverse events other than disease progression. Conclusions: Cabozantinib 60 mg/day has a favorable benefit/risk profile for Japanese patients with advanced HCC who have previously received one or two lines of systemic anticancer therapy including sorafenib. (Clinical trial registration: NCT03586973) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the NAPOLI‐1 phase 3 trial, liposomal irinotecan (nal‐IRI) +5‐fluorouracil/leucovorin (5‐FU/LV) significantly increased mPFS versus 5‐FU/LV (3.1 vs. 1.5 months [unstratified HR = 0.56, p = 0.0001]) in patients with mPAC that progressed on prior gemcitabine‐based therapy. This randomized phase 2 trial evaluated nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV tolerability (Part 1), safety, and efficacy (Part 2; outcomes reported here) in Japanese patients with mPAC that progressed on gemcitabine‐based therapy. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 and stratified by KPS (70 and 80 vs. ≥90) and baseline albumin (≥4.0 g/dl vs. <4.0 g/dl). Primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints were ORR, DCR, OS, TTF, CA19‐9 response, and QoL. The ITT population comprised all randomized patients. Results: Patient characteristics differed between nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV (n = 40) and 5‐FU/LV (n = 39) arms, including baseline hepatic lesions (63% vs. 51%), stage IV disease at diagnosis (78% vs. 51%), and post‐study anticancer therapy (55% vs. 72%). Investigator‐assessed mPFS increase with nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV was clinically meaningful and statistically significant versus 5‐FU/LV (2.7 vs. 1.5 months, HR = 0.60). Independently assessed mPFS showed similar trends (1.7 vs. 1.6 months, HR = 0.79). mOS was 6.3 months with nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV and not reached with 5‐FU/LV. ORR increased significantly with nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV versus 5‐FU/LV (18% vs. 0, rate difference 17.5). Commonly reported grade ≥3 treatment‐emergent AEs were decreased neutrophil count (37% vs. 3%), decreased white blood cell count (20% vs. 0), and diarrhea (17% vs. 3%). Conclusions: In conclusion, clinically meaningful and statistically significant gains in investigator‐assessed PFS and ORR were observed with nal‐IRI+5‐FU/LV versus 5‐FU/LV in Japanese patients, with no new or unexpected safety signals. (Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02697058). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nivolumab, a programmed death (PD)-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, led to durable responses, manageable safety, and increased survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In our retrospective analysis, we studied the immunobiology and potential associations between biomarkers and outcomes with nivolumab in HCC. Fresh and archival tumour samples from dose-escalation and dose-expansion phases of the CheckMate 040 trial were analysed by immunohistochemistry and RNA sequencing to assess several inflammatory gene expression signatures, including CD274 (PD-ligand 1 [PD-L1]), CD8A , LAG3 , and STAT1. Biomarkers were assessed for association with clinical outcomes (best overall response by blinded independent central review per RECIST v1.1 and overall survival [OS]). Complete or partial tumour responses were observed in PD-L1–positive and PD-L1–negative patients treated with nivolumab monotherapy. Median OS was 28.1 (95% CI 18.2–n.a.) vs. 16.6 months (95% CI 14.2–20.2) for patients with tumour PD-L1 ≥1% vs. <1% (p = 0.03). Increased CD3 and CD8 showed a non-significant trend towards improved OS (both p = 0.08), and macrophage markers were not associated with OS. Tumour PD-1 and PD-L1 expression were associated with improved OS (p = 0.05 and p = 0.03, respectively). An inflammatory gene signature consisting of 4 genes was associated with improved objective response rate (p = 0.05) and OS (p = 0.01). PD-1 and PD-L1 expression, biomarkers of inflammation, and inflammatory gene signatures trended with improved survival and response. While further confirmation within a larger phase III trial is needed to evaluate predictive value of these biomarkers, these exploratory analyses suggest that anti-tumour immune response may play a role in the treatment benefit of nivolumab in HCC. Certain tests may be used to provide a picture of how a tumour is escaping the immune system, allowing it to continue to grow and create more tumours. Therapies such as nivolumab are designed to help the immune system fight the tumour. These tests may be used to determine how effective such therapies will be in the treatment of advanced liver cancer. NCT01658878. • Many inflammation-related markers are associated with response to nivolumab in HCC. • Many inflammatory signature scores within tumour samples are associated with survival. • Lower ratios of systemic inflammation markers are associated with clinical benefit. • Patients with HCC demonstrated positive responses regardless of AFP and viral dynamics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Platinum-containing regimens are widely used as first-line chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), but second-line chemotherapies have yet to be established. Objectives: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of everolimus in patients with pancreatic NEC refractory or intolerant to platinum-containing chemotherapy. Methods: This study was a prospective, multicenter, phase II trial in patients with pancreatic NEC after platinum-containing chemotherapy. Everolimus treatment was continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicity was observed. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Participants comprised 25 patients. Median age was 63 years, median PFS was 1.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9–3.1 months), median overall survival was 7.5 months (95% CI 3.1–13.5 months), overall response rate was 0%, and disease control rate was 39.1%. Common grade 3/4 adverse events were hyperglycemia (20%), thrombocytopenia (16%), and anemia (16%). Conclusion: The efficacy of everolimus was limited in patients with unresectable pancreatic NEC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The global, randomized, phase 3 REACH-2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02435433) found significantly longer overall survival (OS) for second-line ramucirumab versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.710, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.531-0.949, P = 0.0199) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥ 400 ng/mL. This prespecified subgroup analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab in the Japanese patients enrolled in the study.Methods: Patients with advanced HCC and AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL after first-line sorafenib were randomized 2:1 to ramucirumab (8 mg/kg intravenously) or placebo every 2 weeks. Hazard ratios for progression-free survival (PFS) and OS (primary endpoint of the overall study) were estimated using the stratified Cox regression model. We also pooled individual patient data from REACH-2 with data from REACH (NCT01140347) for patients with AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL.Results: In the Japanese REACH-2 subpopulation, there were improvements for ramucirumab (n = 41) versus placebo (n = 18) in PFS (HR 0.282, 95% CI 0.144-0.553) and OS was numerically prolonged (HR 0.599, 95% CI 0.303-1.187), consistent with the significant benefit seen in the overall REACH-2 study population. In the ramucirumab and placebo arms, respectively, the objective response rate was 7.3% and 0%, and the disease control rate was 70.7% and 33.3%. The most frequently reported grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse event was hypertension (ramucirumab: 15%; placebo: 11%).Conclusions: Ramucirumab after prior sorafenib improved PFS and OS compared with placebo, with a manageable safety profile, in the Japanese REACH-2 subpopulation, consistent with the overall REACH-2 study results. Ramucirumab is the first agent to demonstrate clinical benefit for Japanese patients with HCC in the second-line setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) is inappropriate to assess the direct effects of treatment on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by locoregional therapies, such as radiofrequency ablation and transarterial chemoembolization. Therefore, establishment of response evaluation criteria solely devoted to HCC is needed in clinical practice, as well as in clinical trials of HCC treatment, such as systemic therapies, which cause necrosis of the tumor. Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer of the Liver (RECICL) was revised in 2019 by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan based on the 2015 version of RECICL, which was commonly used in Japan. The major revised points of the RECICL 2019 are as follows: (i) CEA and CA19‐9 have been newly added as tumor markers that should be recorded for use as criteria in the response evaluation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; (ii) the criteria now state that the details of molecular targeted therapy should be specified; and (iii) specific methods for overall evaluation are now described. Also, as an assessment of overall TE4 requires that TE4 is achieved in all nodules (even non‐target lesions), the same calculation methods described above are used. We hope this new treatment response criteria, RECICL, proposed by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan will benefit the HCC treatment response evaluation in the setting of daily clinical practice and clinical trials as well, not only in Japan, but also internationally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background In our previous randomised phase 2 study for patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer, S-1 plus leucovorin improved progression-free survival compared with S-1 alone. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of TAS-118 (S-1 plus leucovorin) versus S-1 in overall survival (OS). Patients and methods This randomised, open-label, phase 3 study was conducted at 58 centres in Japan and Korea. Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer that progressed during first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy or recurred during or after post-operative gemcitabine-based adjuvant treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either S-1 (40–60 mg, twice daily for 4 weeks in a 6-week cycle) or TAS-118 (S-1 40–60 mg plus leucovorin 25 mg, twice daily for 1 week in a 2-week cycle). The primary end-point was OS. Results A total of 603 patients were randomised, and 300 and 301 patients received TAS-118 and S-1, respectively. There was no difference in OS between groups (median OS for TAS-118 versus S-1, 7.6 months versus 7.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.98 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82–1.16]; P = 0.756). Progression-free survival was significantly longer with TAS-118 than S-1 (median, 3.9 months versus 2.8 months; HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.67–0.95]; P = 0.009). There were interactions between Japan and Korea (P = 0.004) and between unresectable and recurrent disease (P = 0.025) in OS. Incidence, profile and severity of adverse events were similar between groups. Conclusion TAS-118 did not improve OS in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer compared to S-1. Further studies are needed to find patients who have benefit from adding leucovorin to S-1. Highlights • TAS-118 did not improve overall survival for gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer. • TAS-118 improved progression-free survival compared with S-1 monotherapy. • TAS-118 might be more effective than S-1 in some populations of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]