Search

Abstract: Background: Two independent pathways in the development of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) have been described, one related to and the other independent of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV). The aim of our study was to evaluate whether the HPV status has a prognostic significance or can predict response to radiotherapy. Methods: All VSCC diagnosed from 1995 to 2009 were retrospectively evaluated (n =98). HPV infection was detected by amplification of HPV DNA by PCR using SPF-10 primers and typed by the INNO-LIPA HPV research assay. p16INK4a expression was determined by immunohistochemistry. Disease-free and overall survival (DFS and OS) were estimated by Kaplan–Meier analysis with the log-rank test and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard''s model. Results: HR-HPV DNA was detected in 19.4% of patients. HPV16 was the most prevalent genotype (73.7% of cases). p16INK4a stained 100% HPV-positive and 1.3% HPV-negative tumors (p <.001). No differences were found between HPV-positive and -negative tumors in terms of either DFS (39.8% vs. 49.8% at 5years; p =.831), or OS (67.2% vs. 71.4% at 5years; p =.791). No differences in survival were observed between HPV-positive and -negative patients requiring radiotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] .45 to 2.41). FIGO stages III–IV (p =.002), lymph node metastasis (p =.030), size≥20mm (p =.023), invasion depth (p =.020) and ulceration (p =.032) were associated with increased mortality but in multivariated only lymph node metastasis retained the association (HR 13.28, 95% CI 1.19 to 148.61). Conclusions: HPV-positive and -negative VSCCs have a similar prognosis. Radiotherapy does not increase survival in HPV-positive women. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objective: Recent evidence has confirmed two independent pathways in the development of vaginal squamous cell carcinoma (VaSCC): one related to and the other independent of human papillomavirus (HPV). The aim of our study was to evaluate whether HPV status has prognostic significance in this neoplasm. Methods: All confirmed primary VaSCCs diagnosed and treated from 1995 to 2009 in two institutions were retrospectively evaluated (n=57). HPV infection was detected by PCR using SPF-10 primers and typed with the INNO-LIPA HPV assay and p16INK4a expression by immunohistochemistry. Disease-free and overall survival (DFS and OS) were analyzed by Kaplan–Meier analysis with the log-rank test and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard''s model. Results: HR-HPV DNA was detected in 70.2% patients. HPV16 was the most prevalent genotype (67.5% of cases). p16INK4a was positive in 97.5% HPV-positive and 17.6% HPV-negative tumors (p<.001). FIGO stage was associated with DFS (p=.042) and OS (p=.008). HPV-positive tumors showed better DFS (p=.042) and OS (p=.035) than HPV-negative tumors. Multivariate analysis confirmed better DFS and OS of HPV-positive patients independent of age and stage. This reduced risk of progression and mortality in HPV-positive patients was limited to women with FIGO stages I and II tumors (HR=0.26; 95% CI 0.10–0.69; p=0.006). Conclusions: HPV-positive early stage (FIGO I and II) VaSCCs have a better prognosis than early HPV-negative tumors. HPV detection and/or p16INK4a immunostaining can be easily implemented in routine pathology and should be considered as valuable prognostic biomarkers in the study of patients with VaSCC. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]