Search

Background: There is a lack of prospective studies evaluating the natural history of colonic ischaemia (CI). We performed such a study to evaluate the clinical presentation, outcome, and mortality as well as clinical variables associated with poor prognosis., Methods: An open, prospective, and multicentre study was conducted in 24 Spanish hospitals serving a population of 3.5 million people. The study included only patients who met criteria for definitive or probable CI. A website (www.colitisisquemica.org) provided logistical support., Results: A total of 364 patients met criteria for inclusion. CI was suspected clinically in only 24.2% of cases. The distribution of clinical patterns was as follows: reversible colopathy (26.1%), transient colitis (43.7%), gangrenous colitis (9.9%), fulminant pancolitis (2.5%), and chronic segmental colitis (17.9%). A total of 47 patients (12.9%) had an unfavorable outcome as defined by mortality and/or the need for surgery. Multivariate analysis identified the following signs as independent risk factors for an unfavorable outcome: abdominal pain without rectal bleeding [odds ratio (OR) 3.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.6-9.3], non-bloody diarrhoea (OR 10; 95% CI = 3.7-27.4), and peritoneal signs (OR 7.3; 95% CI = 2.7-19.6). Unfavorable outcomes also were more frequent in isolated right colon ischaemia (IRCI) compared with non-IRCI (40.9 vs. 10.3%, respectively; p < 0.0001). The overall mortality rate was 7.7%., Conclusions: The clinical presentation of CI is very heterogeneous, perhaps explaining why clinical suspicion of this disease is so low. The presence of IRCI, and occurrence of peritoneal signs or onset of CI as severe abdominal pain without bleeding, should alert the physician to a potentially unfavorable course.

Background/aims: To determine the value of systemic cytokines as predictors of relapse in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)., Methodology: A prospective study with 135 patients in clinical remission for at least 3 months. At enrollment, a venous blood was drawn in order to measure, by an ELISA test, the following cytokines: TNFalpha, TNFalpha-R1 and R2, IL-16, IL-1beta, IL 2, IL-R2, IL-6, IL-10, and IFNgamma. All patients were followed-up for one year., Result: Sixty-six patients had Crohn's disease (CD) and 69 had ulcerative colitis (UC). Thirty-nine (30%) had a relapse. Forty-four percent were receiving immunomodulatory therapy. No differences were found regarding detection and baseline concentration of the various cytokines between patients with CD and UC, or between patients with or without ongoing use of immunomodulators. The detection and concentration levels of cytokines were not associated with the risk of relapse of IBD., Conclusions: Systemic cytokines are of little value to predict IBD relapse.

Background and Objective: Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) may have an increased risk of developing hepatitis B virus (HB) infection. Invasive procedures such as colonoscopies and surgery might be some of the reasons for this. Moreover, the use of immunosuppressors may reactivate a latent infection. We assessed the immune status among IBD patients receiving HB vaccine and the circumstances that predicted its results., Aims and Methods: Serological markers of B and C hepatitis virus in patients with IBD who were referred for consultation were assessed since 2006. The subsequent determination of antibodies against superficial antigen (HBsAb) could differentiate between responders and non responders to the vaccine and an adequate immunity to HB was defined as higher than 10mUI/ml., Results: One hundred and twenty nine patients were included in our study. Fifty-six (43,4%) patients had received immunosuppressive medication before the first vaccine dose. Notably, 85 (65.9%) patients had inadequate levels of HBsAb: 36 had no detectable levels and 49 had less than 10mUI/ml. Younger patients had a better immunity response than older patients (30.91+/-14.8 vs 39.91+/-14.2) (p<0.001)., Conclusion: More than half of the patients had a suboptimal serologic response after vaccination. Only the younger group showed a better rate of response. It was not demonstrated whether an additional fourth dose of vaccination or a complete revaccination improved the rate of responders.

Background and Objective: Abdominal pain and diarrhoea are common symptoms in the general population. The colonoscopy is the gold standard method of detecting an organic pathology in the colon. However, it is invasive; it can not be repeated frecuently; it is expensive; and the system is overloaded. Fecal calprotectin (FCP) is a marker that may detect organic pathologies of the colon. The aims of this study were to analyze the usefulness of FCP to predict an abnormal colonoscopy and to correlate the levels of FCP with the degree of activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)., Patients and Method: 190 people were included in the study. All of them underwent a colonoscopy and a stool sample. People were divided in: normal colonoscopy: 117 people, and 28 colon adenomas, 20 colorectal cancer (CRC) and 25 IBD., Results: The mean (SD) FCP concentration was 2,171.1 (2,133.6) mg/kgin patients with IBD and 726.6 mg/kg (533) in CRC. Both results were significantly elevated compared with those of healthy controls [114 (113)] mg/kg In patients with IBD, their levels correlated directly with the activity of the inflammation. 217 mg/kg was the best cut-off for discriminating patients with organic colon disorders. The sensibility was 85% and NPV was 93%. NSAIDs use was a clinical variable which was connected with a high FCP concentration in patients with normal colonoscopy., Conclusions: The higher levels of FCP were found in people with IBD and CRC. The measurement of FCP is a non-invasive, inexpensive, reliable and easily measured test. Among people with abdominal pain and diarrhoea, testing for FCP allows us to select those who must undergo a colonoscopy. NSAIDs can raise the levels of FCP in people with normal colonoscopies.