Search

Reliable determination of Ki67 labeling index (Ki67-LI) on core needle biopsy (CNB) is essential for determining breast cancer molecular subtype for therapy planning. However, studies on agreement between molecular subtype and Ki67-LI between CNB and surgical resection (SR) specimens are conflicting. The present study analyzed the influence of clinicopathological and sampling-associated factors on agreement. Molecular subtype was determined visually by Ki67-LI in 484 pairs of CNB and SR specimens of invasive estrogen receptor (ER)–positive, human epidermal growth factor (HER2)–negative breast cancer. Luminal B disease was defined by Ki67-LI > 20% in SR. Correlation of molecular subtype agreement with age, menopausal status, CNB method, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System imaging category, time between biopsies, type of surgery, and pathological tumor parameters was analyzed. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. CNB had a sensitivity of 77.95% and a specificity of 80.97% for identifying luminal B tumors in CNB, compared with the final molecular subtype determination after surgery. The correlation of Ki67-LI between CNB and SR was moderate (ROC-AUC 0.8333). Specificity and sensitivity for CNB to correctly define molecular subtype of tumors according to SR were significantly associated with tumor grade, immunohistochemical progesterone receptor (PR) and p53 expression (p p = 0.22 for both). The identified factors likely mirror intratumoral heterogeneity that might compromise obtaining a representative CNB. Our results challenge the robustness of a single CNB-driven measurement of Ki67-LI to identify luminal B breast cancer of low (G1) or intermediate (G2) grade.

Data on the accuracy of intraoperative resection margin assessment and its influence on survival after neoadjuvant therapy (NT) are scarce. In the present study, we analyzed the accuracy of resection margin assessment by intraoperative frozen section (IFS) in the prospectively randomized neoadjuvant clinical trials ABCSG 24 and ABCSG 34.164 patients with early breast cancer who received NT within the ABCSG 24 and ABCSG 34 trials between 2005 and 2015, and received IFS resection margin assessment were included in our analysis. Resection margin status by IFS was compared to subsequent FFPE resection margin status, which was considered the gold standard. According to the rate of FFPE-based false-negative and false-positive diagnoses, we determined sensitivity and specificity of IFS. Correlation of IFS diagnosis with definitive FFPE assessment was described by Cohen´s kappa coefficient, the distributional probability was analyzed by McNemar test. The association of patient- and tumor-related factors (menopausal status, residual tumor size, tumor grade, lymph node status, multifocality, DCIS component, lymph vessel invasion, ER/PR/HER2/Ki67 expression and RCB category) with correct IFS diagnosis was analyzed by chi2 test and Fisher´s exact test. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Median age of patients was 55 years. IFS diagnosis for negative margins (no tumor on ink) was correct in 131 (80%) cases, translating into a sensitivity of 0.571 and specificity of 0.877 (false negative rate: 43%, false positive rate 12%). Correlation coefficient for IFS and FFPE diagnosis yielded a Cohen´s kappa value of 0.459. 58 patients (35%) were re-excised during the first operation, in 27 patients (17%), a second surgical intervention was performed. Overall re-excision rates in patients with true positive, false positive and false negative IFS diagnoses were 96%, 93% and 78%, respectively. Rate of second surgical interventions in patients with true positive, false positive and false negative IFS diagnoses were 38%, 7% and 44%, respectively. Correct IFS diagnosis correlated with smaller residual tumor size (p=0.032), lymph node status (p=0.007), HER2 negativity (p=0.049), presence of a DCIS component (p=0.013) and absence of lymph vessel invasion (p=0.007). Despite of re-operation resulting in negative margins, false negative IFS diagnosis was associated with worse recurrence-free survival (p=0.0278). The impact of IFS diagnosis on OS did not reach statistical significance (p=0.0995), although patients with false negative IFS diagnosis showed a shorter OS. IFS assessment of margins after NT displayed high specificity and limited sensitivity in the ABCSG 24 and ABCSG 34 trials. Residual tumor size, lymph node status, HER2 positivity, presence of a DCIS component and lymph vessel invasion correlated with accuracy of IFS. Patients with false negative IFS margin status showed a significantly shorter RFS despite of a second intervention yielding negative margins. Larger studies are needed to confirm the effects of IFS margin assessment on OS. Our data could help to lower rates of subsequent surgical interventions for re-excision after NT and identify patients by the above mentioned tumor characteristics who are at an increased risk of recurrence despite negative margin status. Citation Format: Karin Rokitte, Kristina Tendl-Schulz, Ulrike Heber, Kerstin Wimmer, Rupert Bartsch, Stephanie Kacerovsky-Strobl, Georg Pfeiler, Günther G. Steger, Christian F. Singer, Dominik Hlauschek, Michael Gnant, Florian Fitzal, Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath. Accuracy and predictive value of resection margin assessment by intraoperative frozen section after neoadjuvant therapy: An analysis of the ABCSG 24 and 34 trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-02-07.

Introduction: Myelosuppresion is a common side effect of chemotherapy and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is often used to reduce the risk of neutropenic events. The purpose of this e...

In postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer, treatment with adjuvant aromatase inhibitors is the standard of care, but it increases risk for osteoporosis and fractures. Results from the ABCSG-18 trial showed that use of denosumab as an adjuvant to aromatase inhibitor therapy significantly reduced clinical fractures. Disease-free survival outcomes from ABCSG-18 have not yet been reported.Postmenopausal patients with early, hormone receptor-positive, non-metastatic adenocarcinoma of the breast, who had completed their initial adjuvant treatment pathway (surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy, or a combination) and were receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors, were enrolled at 58 trial centres in Austria and Sweden into this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. With permuted block randomisation (block sizes 2 and 4, stratified by previous aromatase inhibitor use, total lumbar spine bone mineral density score at baseline, and type of centre), patients were assigned (1:1) to receive subcutaneous denosumab (60 mg) or matching placebo every 6 months during aromatase inhibitor therapy. The primary endpoint (previously reported) was the time to first clinical fracture after randomisation. The secondary endpoint reported here is disease-free survival (defined as time from randomisation to first evidence of local or distant metastasis, contralateral breast cancer, secondary carcinoma, or death from any cause) in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with EudraCT (number 2005-005275-15) and ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT00556374), and is ongoing for long-term follow-up.Between Dec 18, 2006, and July 22, 2013, 3425 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned; 1711 to the denosumab group and 1709 to the placebo group (with five others withdrawing consent). After a median follow-up of 73 months (IQR 58-95), 240 (14·0%) patients in the denosumab and 287 (16·8%) in the placebo group had disease-free survival events. Disease-free survival was significantly improved in the denosumab group versus the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·82, 95% CI 0·69-0·98, Cox p=0·0260; descriptive analysis, without controlling for multiplicity). In the denosumab group, disease-free survival was 89·2% (95% CI 87·6-90·8) at 5 years and 80·6% (78·1-83·1) at 8 years of follow-up, compared with 87·3% (85·7-89·0) at 5 years and 77·5% (74·8-80·2) and 8 years in the placebo group. No independently adjudicated cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw or confirmed atypical femoral fractures were recorded. The total number of adverse events was similar in the denosumab group (1367 [including 521 serious] adverse events) and the placebo group (1339 [515 serious]). The most common serious adverse events were osteoarthritis (62 [3·6%] of 1709 in the denosumab group vs 58 [3·4%] of 1690 in the placebo group), meniscus injury (23 [1·3%] vs 24 [1·4%]), and cataract (16 [0·9%] vs 28 [1·7%]). One (0·1%) treatment-related death (due to pneumonia, septic kidney failure, and cardiac decompensation) occurred in the denosumab group.Denosumab constitutes an effective and safe adjuvant treatment for patients with postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer receiving aromatase inhibitor therapy.Amgen.

This abstract was withdrawn by the authors. Citation Format: Minichsdorfer C, Bergen E, Steger GG, Pfeiler G, Frantal S, Greil R, Fohler H, Egle D, Balic M, Fitzal F, Wette V, Exner R, Bartsch RA, Gnant M. Withdrawn [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-21-02.

Background: Therapeutic recommendations for adjuvant treatment of hormone-receptor positive breast cancer patients depend on the individual recurrence risk. A number of genomic assays introduced to achieve this goal, but it's still questioned if they actually offer superior risk assessment compared to traditional risk evaluation by experienced clinicians. This study was designed to compare the prognostic accuracy of PAM-50 to clinical judgment. Methods: Based on the real data of a large adjuvant trial cohort (ABCSG-8, postmenopausal HR positive breast cancer patients), we created online-questionnaires including demographic, histological, and local-therapy details, with and without results of PAM50 ROR score. Out of 14 international breast cancer experts asked for individual patient's risk evaluation (low, intermediate, high) and therapy recommendations, 9 completed the questionnaire. Patient data were described by Kaplan-Meier estimates of distant disease free survival (DDFS) stratified by risk group. Cox regression models were compared using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Results: 10 years DDFS and hazard ratios for distant recurrences stratified by risk-group as estimated giving in Table 1: 10 years DDFS and hazard ratios for distant recurrences stratified by risk-group as estimated Low riskIntermediate riskHigh risk n (%)10y DDFS,%(95%CI)n (%)10y DDFS,%(95%CI)n (%)10y DDFS, %(95%CI) HR(95% CI) HR(95% CI) HR(95% CI)Clinical only: AIC 817.6269 (43)93.0(89.8-96.2)289 (46)89.7(85.9-93.5)73 (11)76.6(66.1-87.1) 0.68(0.39,1.20) 1 2.57(1.41,4.65)PAM50 ROR: AIC 804.8241 (34)96.5(93.1-99.1)210 (33)89.2(84.7-93.7)207 (33)82.5(76.9-88.2) 0.27(0.11,0.62) 1 1.66(0.99,2.78)Combined: AIC 813.4232 (37)95.7(93.0-98.5)282 (45)87.8(83.7-92.0)117 (18)81.7(74.2-89.2) 0.42(0.22,0.84) 1 1.90(1.11,3.24) Adding genomic information to clinical risk factors leads to escalation of therapeutic recommendations (i.e. additional chemotherapy, extended adjuvant endocrine) in 20% of patients, and de-escalation in 13% of patients. Conclusions: Clinical judgment accurately identified the patients at high risk of relapse, but was clearly inferior to multi-genomic testing using the PAM-50 ROR score in differentiating low from intermediate risk. Particularly when avoiding unnecessary escalated therapy is the strategic goal, the addition of PAM-50 testing to clinical judgment offers improved accuracy in predicting low vs. intermediate risk of breast cancer recurrence. Citation Format: Devyatko Y, Filipits M, Greil R, Balic M, Bago-Horvath Z, Singer C, Fitzal F, Steger G, Gray B, Ferree S, Fesl C, Soelkner L, von Minckwitz G, Gnant M. The impact of clinical risk assessment versus PAM-50 ROR score on prognosis and therapeutic decision making in patients with hormone-receptor positive early stage breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-17-05.

Purpose As critical parameter after extravasation of cytotoxic vesicants, anthracyclines were determined in removed tissue from patients requiring surgical intervention due to tissue necrosis. We monitored their distribution within the affected lesion to establish a possible dose–toxicity relation. Methods From six patients scheduled for surgery, removed tissue flaps were systematically analysed by HPLC (epirubicin: 5 subjects; doxorubicin: 1 subject). Results After extravasation, tissue concentrations were highly variable with an individual anthracycline distribution pattern ranging from a few nanograms up to 17 µg per 100 mg tissue, which indicated a substantial difference in tissue sensitivity among patients. The resection borders coincided with the extension of the erythema and guided the surgical intervention after demarcation of the lesion, which occurred usually 2 or 3 weeks after extravasation. At that time, drug was hardly detected at the resection borders. Wound drains were negative for the extravasated drugs while showing a time profile of vascular growth factors and inflammatory cytokines, which was highly similar to routine surgery. In all six patients, surgical debridement with immediate wound closure led to healing within approximately 2 weeks, when therapy was resumed in all patients with reasonable time delay. Conclusion Surgical intervention after demarcation of the extravasation lesion allows for almost uninterrupted continuation of treatment independent of the amount of extravasated anthracycline. As even minor amounts of the vesicants may trigger tissue necrosis, preventive measures merit the highest priority.

Background Patients with prostate cancer are at risk of impaired bone health. Prostate cancer has a propensity to metastasize to bone, after which patients are at risk of skeletal-related events (SREs). These complications are associated with increased mortality, substantial pain, and reduced quality of life. Patients are also at risk of bone loss due to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), which can be compounded in elderly patients with reduced bone density. It is essential, therefore, that aspects of bone health and therapies able to prevent the occurrence of SREs are considered throughout the clinical course of prostate cancer. Methods We reviewed the literature regarding the molecular mechanisms underpinning bone lesion formation, the modes of action of therapies that prevent SREs, and the efficacy and safety of these therapies in patients with hormone-sensitive or castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Results Therapies such as denosumab (a RANKL inhibitor) and zoledronic acid (a bisphosphonate) were indicated for prevention of SREs. Radium-223 dichloride also has proven efficacy in delaying symptomatic SREs, as well as in improving overall survival through effects on bone metastases. Before development of bone metastases, low-dose denosumab may also be used for treatment of ADT-associated bone loss. Denosumab may also have the potential to delay bone metastases development in patients with CRPC, although this is not currently an approved indication. The safety profile of therapies to prevent SREs should be considered. This review consolidates the available evidence on use of denosumab and bisphosphonates in prostate cancer, differentiated by hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant disease. Conclusions There is convincing evidence to support the use of denosumab and bisphosphonates to maintain bone health in patients with prostate cancer. Clinicians should be mindful of the adverse event risk profile of these therapies.

Purpose To evaluate whether pathological complete response to neoadjuvant trastuzumab is dependent on the level of HER2 amplification. Patients and Methods 114 women with HER2-overexpressing early breast cancer who had received neo-adjuvant trastuzumab in the prospective ABCSG-24 and ABCSG-32 trials, and for whom the HER2/CEP17 ratio was available, were included in this analysis. The ratio was correlated with tumor response as measured by the three most commonly used definitions of pathological complete response: ypT0 ypN0, ypT0/is ypN0, and ypT0/is. Results In trastuzumab-treated patients, ypT0 pN0 was achieved in 69.0% of patients with a HER2/CEP17 ratio of >6, but only in 30.4% of tumors with a ratio of ≤6 (p=0.001, Chi Square test). When pCR was defined by ypT0/is pN0 or by ypTis, 75.9% and 82.8% of tumors with a high ratio had a complete remission, while only 39.1%, and 38.3% with a low ratio achieved a pCR (p=0.002 and p Conclusion A HER2/CEP17 ratio of >6 in the pre-therapeutic tumor biopsy is associated with a significantly higher pCR rate particularly in HER2 / HR co-positive tumors, and can be used to predict outcome before neoadjuvant trastuzumab is initiated. Citation Format: Singer CF, Tan YY, Fitzal F, Steger GG, Egle D, Reiner A, Rudas M, Gruber C, Bartsch R, Fridrik M, Seifert M, Exner R, Balic M, Bago-Horvath Z, Filipits M, Gnant M, For the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant trastuzumab is dependent on HER2/CEP17 ratio in HER2-amplified early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-09-10.

Background While “no tumour on ink” is an accepted margin width for R0 resection in primary surgery, it’s unclear if it’s oncologically safe after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Only limited data demonstrate that surgery within new margins in cases of a pathological complete response (pCR) is safe. We therefore investigated the influence of different margins and pCR on local recurrence and survival rates after NAC. Methods We retrospectively analysed data of 406 women with invasive breast cancer, treated with NAC and breast-conserving therapy between 1994 and 2014 in two certified Austrian breast health centres. We compared R ≤ 1 mm, R > 1 mm and RX (pCR) for local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results After a median follow-up of 84.3 months, the 5-year LRFS (R ≤ 1 mm: 94.2%, R > 1 mm: 90.6%, RX: 95.0%; p = 0.940), the 5-year DFS (R ≤ 1 mm: 71.9%, R > 1 mm: 74.1%, RX: 87.2%; p = 0.245) and the 5-year OS (R ≤ 1 mm: 85.1%, R > 1 mm: 88.0%, RX: 96.4%; p = 0.236) did not differ significantly between narrow, wide, nor RX resections. Regarding DFS and OS, a negative nodal status reduced the hazard ratio significantly. Conclusion There is no significant difference in LRFS, DFS and OS comparing close, wide or unknown margins after pCR. We suggest that resection in new margins after NAC is safe according to “no tumour on ink”. Resection of the clipped area in cases of pCR is emphasized.

Conflicting evidence exists regarding the value of surgical resection of the primary in stage IV breast cancer patients.The prospective randomized phase III ABCSG-28 POSYTIVE trial evaluated median survival comparing primary surgery followed by systemic therapy to primary systemic therapy in de novo stage IV breast cancer.Between 2011 and 2015, 90 previously untreated stage IV breast cancer patients were randomly assigned to surgical resection of the primary tumor followed by systemic therapy (Arm A) or primary systemic therapy (Arm B) in Austria. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the primary study endpoint.The trial was stopped early due to poor recruitment. Ninety patients (45 arm A, 45 arm B) were included; median follow-up was 37.5 months. Patients in the surgery arm had more cT3 breast cancer (22.2% vs 6.7%) and more cN2 staging (15.6% vs 4.4%). Both groups were well balanced with respect to the type of first-line systemic treatment. Median survival in arm A was 34.6 months, versus 54.8 months in the nonsurgery arm [hazard ratio (HR) 0.691, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.358-1.333; P = 0.267]; time to distant progression was 13.9 months in the surgery arm and 29.0 months in the nonsurgery arm (HR 0.598, 95% CI 0.343-1.043; P = 0.0668).The prospective phase III trial ABCSG-28 (POSYTIVE) could not demonstrate an OS benefit for surgical resection of the primary in breast cancer patients presenting with de novo stage IV disease.

Introduction: Despite the large use of nab-paclitaxel as a treatment option in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) across different countries, no definitive data are available in particular clinical situations. Areas covered: Efficacy, safety and schedule issues concerning available literature on nab-paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer and in specific subgroups of patients have been discussed and voted during an International Expert Meeting. Ten expert specialists in oncology, with extensive clinical experience on Nab-P and publications in the field of MBC have been identified. Six scientific areas of interest have been covered, generating 13 specific Statements for Nab-P, after literature review. For efficacy issues, a summary of research quality was performed adopting the GRADE algorithm for evidence scoring. The panel members were invited to express their opinion on the statements, in case of disagreement all the controversial opinions and the relative motivations have been made public. Expert opinion: Consensus was reached in 30.8% of the Nab-P statements, mainly those regarding safety issues, whereas ones regarding efficacy and schedule still remain controversial areas, requiring further data originated by the literature.

Summary Background The randomised phase 3 TURANDOT trial compared two approved bevacizumab-containing regimens for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in terms of efficacy, safety, and quality of life. The interim analysis did not confirm non-inferior overall survival (stratified hazard ratio [HR] 1·04; 97·5% repeated CI [RCI] –∞ to 1·69). Here we report final results of our study aiming to show non-inferior overall survival with first-line bevacizumab plus capecitabine versus bevacizumab plus paclitaxel for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Methods In this multinational, open-label, randomised phase 3 TURANDOT trial, patients aged 18 years or older who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–2 and measurable or non-measurable HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer who had received no previous chemotherapy for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer were stratified and randomly assigned (1:1) using permuted blocks of size six to either bevacizumab plus paclitaxel (bevacizumab 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 plus paclitaxel 90 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks) or bevacizumab plus capecitabine (bevacizumab 15 mg/kg on day 1 plus capecitabine 1000 mg/m 2 twice daily on days 1–14 every 3 weeks) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Stratification factors were oestrogen or progesterone receptor status, country, and menopausal status. The primary objective was to show non-inferior overall survival with bevacizumab plus capecitabine versus bevacizumab plus paclitaxel in the per-protocol population by rejecting the null hypothesis of inferiority (HR ≥1·33) using a stratified Cox proportional hazard model. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00600340. Findings Between Sept 10, 2008, and Aug 30, 2010, 564 patients were randomised, representing the intent-to-treat population. The per-protocol population comprised 531 patients (266 in the bevacizumab plus paclitaxel group and 265 in the bevacizumab plus capecitabine group). At the final overall survival analysis after 183 deaths (69%) in 266 patients receiving bevacizumab plus paclitaxel and 201 (76%) in 265 receiving bevacizumab plus capecitabine in the per-protocol population, median overall survival was 30·2 months (95% CI 25·6–32·6 months) versus 26·1 months (22·3–29·0), respectively. The stratified HR was 1·02 (97·5% RCI –∞ to 1·26; repeated p=0·0070), indicating non-inferiority. The unstratified Cox model (HR 1·13 [97·5% RCI –∞ to 1·39]; repeated p=0·061) did not support the primary analysis. Intent-to-treat analyses were consistent with the per-protocol results. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (54 [19%] of 284 patients in the bevacizumab plus paclitaxel group vs 5 [2%] of 277 patients in the bevacizumab plus capecitabine group), hand–foot syndrome (1 [ vs 43 [16%]), peripheral neuropathy (39 [14%] vs 1 [ vs 1 [ vs 16 [6%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 65 (23%) of 284 patients receiving bevacizumab plus paclitaxel and 68 (25%) of 277 receiving bevacizumab plus capecitabine. Deaths in two (1%) of 284 patients in the bevacizumab plus paclitaxel group were deemed by the investigator to be treatment-related. No treatment-related deaths occurred in the bevacizumab plus capecitabine group. Interpretation Bevacizumab plus capecitabine represents a valid first-line treatment option for HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, offering good tolerability without compromising overall survival compared with bevacizumab plus paclitaxel. Although progression-free survival with the bevacizumab plus capecitabine combination is inferior to that noted with bevacizumab plus paclitaxel, we suggest that physicians should consider possible predictive risk factors for overall survival, individual's treatment priorities, and the differing safety profiles. Funding Roche.

We aimed to analyse the impact of breast cancer (BC) subtypes on the clinical course of disease with special emphasis on the occurrence of brain metastases (BM) and outcome in an elderly BC population. A total number of 706 patients ≥65 years receiving treatment for BC from 2007 to 2011 were identified from a BC database. 62 patients diagnosed with DCIS and 73 patients with incomplete datasets were excluded, leaving 571 patients for this analysis. Patient characteristics, biological tumour subtypes, and clinical outcome including overall survival (OS) were obtained by retrospective chart review. 380/571 (66, 5 %) patients aged 65–74 years were grouped among the young-old, 182/571 (31.9 %) patients aged 75–84 years among the old–old, and 29/571 (5.1 %) patients aged ≥85 years among the oldest-old. 392/571 (68.8 %) patients presented with luminal BC, 119/571 (20.8 %) with HER2-positive, and 59/571 (10.3 %) with triple-negative BC (TNBC). At 38 months median follow-up, 115/571 (20.1 %) patients presented with distant recurrence. A higher recurrence rate was observed in the HER2-positive subtype (43/119 (36.1 %)), as compared to TNBC (15/59 (25.4 %)) and luminal BC (57/392 (14.5 %); p

Background We aimed to analyze the impact of BC subtypes on the clinical course with special emphasis on the occurrence of brain metastases (BM) and outcome in an elderly breast cancer population. Patients and Methods 571 patients ≥65 years receiving treatment for BC from 2007-2011 were identified from a BC database. BC subtypes and clinical characteristics including overall survival (OS) were obtained by chart review. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi Square test, the log rank test and time depended covariate cox regression model as appropriate. Results Three-hundred-eighty/571 (63%) were grouped among the young-old (65-74 years), 182/571 (31.9%) among the old-old (75-84 years), and 29/571 (5,1%) among the oldest-old (≥85 years). 392/571 (68.8%) patients presented with luminal BC, 119/571 (20.8%) with HER2 positive and 59/571 (10.3%) with triple negative BC. After a median follow up of 38 months (range 0-204), 115/571 (20.1%) patients presented with metastatic recurrence. Highest recurrence rate was observed in HER2 positive BC patients (43/119 (36.1%)), followed by triple negative (15/59 (25.4%) and luminal BC (57/392 (14.5%); p Conclusions In contrast to younger BC patients, HER2 positive BC subtype and not triple negative BC subtype was linked to the most aggressive clinical course including the development of metastatic disease and BM in our elderly cohort. Citation Format: Bergen ES, Tichy C, Berghoff AS, Rudas M, Dubsky P, Bago-Horvath Z, Mader RM, Gnant M, Dieckmann K, Zielinski CC, Steger GG, Preusser M, Bartsch R. Prognostic impact of breast cancer subtypes in elderly patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-17.

Za ovaj rad nije dostupan sažetak.

Background Adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy improves breast cancer (BC) outcomes compared to standard chemotherapy, with no increase in chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea (CIA). However, the impact of menopausal status and the contribution of CIA to outcomes per subtype remain unclear. Methods PANTHER is a phase 3 trial comparing tailored, according to hematologic nadirs, and dose-dense (tdd) epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) and docetaxel (D) versus standard interval FEC/D. The primary endpoint of the trial is relapse-free survival (BCRFS). This exploratory secondary analysis aimed to evaluate whether there was differential efficacy of tdd therapy according to menopausal status and if differences in CIA, defined as amenorrhea at 2 years following treatment, may contribute to its efficacy. Results Baseline menopause status was available for 1913 women; 1036 premenopausal and 877 postmenopausal. Median follow-up was 5.3 years. The administration of tdd EC/D was associated with a non-statistically significant improvement in BCRFS in both premenopausal (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.59 – 1.16, p = 0.265) and postmenopausal patients (HR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.51 – 1.06, p = 0.102; pinteraction0.658). On the contrary, a significant interaction was noticed in women with triple negative BC (TNBC, p = 0.043). Tdd EC/D improved BCRFS in postmenopausal women (HR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.19 – 1.03, p = 0.06) but had a trend to opposite effect among premenopausal women (HR = 1.29, 95% CI 0.69 – 2.40, p = 0.426). There was no difference in CIA rates between the two treatment groups (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.77 – 1.39). Conclusions Tdd EC/D was associated with non-significant improvements in BCRFS, regardless of menopause status, without increasing rates of CIA. Negative effect on TNBC could be a chance finding due to low number of patients but the results warrant caution and necessitate further investigation. Legal entity responsible for the study The authors. Funding Swedish Cancer Society, Swedish Breast Cancer Association (BRO), Radiumhemmet Research funds, Amgen, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis. Disclosure G. Steger: Honoraria (self): Amgen. R. Greil: Honoraria (self): Amgen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Honoraria (self): BMS; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Amgen; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen; Research grant / Funding (self): Roche; Research grant / Funding (self): BMS; Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca. S. Loibl: Research grant / Funding (institution): Vigor; Honoraria (institution): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (institution): Amgen; Honoraria (institution): Pfizer; Honoraria (institution): Roche; Honoraria (institution): Puma; Honoraria (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Puma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Teva. M. Gnant: Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Amgen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Celgene; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Lilly; Honoraria (self): Invectys; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Nano string; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Honoraria (self): Medison; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Medison. V. Moebus: Honoraria (self): Amgen; Honoraria (self): Celgene; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Myelotherapeutics; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca. T. Foukakis: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): UptoDate. J. Bergh: Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Amgen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi-Aventis; Honoraria (self): Uptodate. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Patients with cancer may display elevated levels of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and high-sensitive troponin T (hsTnT) without clinical manifestation of cardiac disease. This study aimed to evaluate circulating cardiovascular hormones and hsTnT and their association with mortality in cancer.We prospectively enrolled 555 consecutive patients with a primary diagnosis of cancer and without prior cardiotoxic anticancer therapy. N-terminal pro BNP (NT-proBNP), mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), C-terminal pro-endothelin-1 (CT-proET-1), copeptin, hsTnT, proinflammatory markers interleukin 6 (IL-6) and C reactive protein (CRP), and cytokines serum amyloid A (SAA), haptoglobin and fibronectin were measured. All-cause mortality was defined as primary endpoint.During a median follow-up of 25 (IQR 16-31) months, 186 (34%) patients died. All cardiovascular hormones and hsTnT levels rose with tumour stage progression. All markers were significant predictors of mortality with HRs per IQR of 1.54 (95% CI 1.24 to 1.90, p0.001) for NT-proBNP, 1.40 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.79, p0.01) for MR-proANP, 1.31 (95% CI 1.19 to 1.44, p0.001) for MR-proADM, 1.21 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.30, p0.001) for CT-proET-1, 1.22 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.42, p=0.014) for copeptin and 1.21 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.32, p0.001) for hsTnT, independent of age, gender, tumour entity and stage, and presence of cardiac comorbidities. NT-proBNP, MR-proANP, MR-proADM and hsTnT displayed a significant correlation with IL-6 and CRP.Circulating levels of cardiovascular peptides like NT-proBNP, MR-proANP, MR-proADM, CT-pro-ET-1 and hsTnT were elevated in an unselected population of patients with cancer prior to induction of any cardiotoxic anticancer therapy. The aforementioned markers and copeptin were strongly related to all-cause mortality, suggesting the presence of subclinical functional and morphological myocardial damage directly linked to disease progression.

We investigated the hypothesis that the varying treatment efficacy of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5FU) in stage III colon cancer is linked to the TP53 mutational status. ABCSG-90 was a prospective randomized trial in which effect of adjuvant 5FU was studied in stage III colon cancer patients. Tumor material of 70% of these patients (389/572) was available for analysis of the biomarker TP53 using a TP53-gene-specific Sanger sequencing protocol. Median follow-up was 88 months. TP53 mutation frequency was 33%. A significant interaction between TP53 status, outcomes and nodal category was found (P = 0.0095). In the N1 category, TP53 wildtype patients had significantly better overall survival than TP53 mutated (81.0% vs. 62.0% overall survival at 5 years; HR = 2.131; 95% CI: 1.344–3.378; P = 0.0010). In the N2 category, the TP53 status did not affect survival (P = 0.4992). In TP53 wildtype patients, the prognostic significance of N category was significantly enhanced (P = 0.0002). In TP53 mutated patients, survival curves of N1 and N2 patients overlapped and nodal category was no longer prognostic. The biomarker TP53 independently predicted effect of adjuvant 5FU in N1 colon cancer patients. TP53 was not predictive in N2 patients, in whom 5FU is known to have no effect., Highlights • The TP53 status was found to be an independent predictive marker for the effect of adjuvant 5FU in stage III colon cancer. • In the N1 category, patients with wildtype TP53 experienced a significant survival benefit from adjuvant 5FU. • In TP53 mutant patients survival curves of N1 and N2 patients overlapped and nodal category was no longer prognostic. Postoperative chemotherapy is recommended for all patients with lymph node positive colon cancer. In colon cancer, mutations in the TP53 gene are present in more than 30% of tumors. We found that the most commonly used postoperative chemotherapy resulted in a marked survival benefit for patients with normal TP53 status while it was associated with significant survival disadvantage in TP53 mutant patients. Overall the survival disadvantage of the mutated patients almost balanced the survival benefit of the TP53 normal patients. This might be an explanation why chemotherapy resulted in less progress in survival of colon cancer than we would have expected.

Summary Background Adjuvant endocrine therapy compromises bone health in patients with breast cancer, causing osteopenia, osteoporosis, and fractures. Antiresorptive treatments such as bisphosphonates prevent and counteract these side-effects. In this trial, we aimed to investigate the effects of the anti-RANK ligand antibody denosumab in postmenopausal, aromatase inhibitor-treated patients with early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Methods In this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, postmenopausal patients with early hormone receptor-positive breast cancer receiving treatment with aromatase inhibitors were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either denosumab 60 mg or placebo administered subcutaneously every 6 months in 58 trial centres in Austria and Sweden. Patients were assigned by an interactive voice response system. The randomisation schedule used a randomly permuted block design with block sizes 2 and 4, stratified by type of hospital regarding Hologic device for DXA scans, previous aromatase inhibitor use, and baseline bone mineral density. Patients, treating physicians, investigators, data managers, and all study personnel were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was time from randomisation to first clinical fracture, analysed by intention to treat. As an additional sensitivity analysis, we also analysed the primary endpoint on the per-protocol population. Patients were treated until the prespecified number of 247 first clinical fractures was reached. This trial is ongoing (patients are in follow-up) and is registered with the European Clinical Trials Database, number 2005-005275-15, and with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00556374. Findings Between Dec 18, 2006, and July 22, 2013, 3425 eligible patients were enrolled into the trial, of whom 3420 were randomly assigned to receive denosumab 60 mg (n=1711) or placebo (n=1709) subcutaneously every 6 months. Compared with the placebo group, patients in the denosumab group had a significantly delayed time to first clinical fracture (hazard ratio [HR] 0·50 [95% CI 0·39–0·65], p vs 511 [30% in each group]). The main adverse events were arthralgia and other aromatase-inhibitor related symptoms; no additional toxicity from the study drug was reported. Despite proactive adjudication of every potential osteonecrosis of the jaw by an international expert panel, no cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw were reported. 93 patients (3% of the full analysis set) died during the study, of which one death (in the denosumab group) was thought to be related to the study drug. Interpretation Adjuvant denosumab 60 mg twice per year reduces the risk of clinical fractures in postmenopausal women with breast cancer receiving aromatase inhibitors, and can be administered without added toxicity. Since a main side-effect of adjuvant breast cancer treatment can be substantially reduced by the addition of denosumab, this treatment should be considered for clinical practice. Funding Amgen.

Introduction: Invasive lobular cancer (ILC) is the second most common histological type of breast cancer, appearing to have a biology distinct from ductal cancer (IDC). In the first 5 years, the prognosis of ILC seems to be more favourable compared to IDC. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in benefit from adjuvant Tamoxifen (Tam) and Anastrozol (Ana) for these histologic subtypes. Patients and Methods: The ABCSG-8 (Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group 8) study was a randomized phase III clinical trial (n=3.714) in hormone receptor-positive cancer addressing a sequence strategy with 3 years of Ana after 2 years of Tam in comparison with 5 years of Tam in a low- to intermediate-risk group (Grade 1/2) of postmenopausal patients not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate comparisons for overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between endocrine treatments were conducted per subgroup with respect to histology (ductal or lobular). Multivariate Cox analysis included endocrine treatment, histology and their interaction ± additional covariates (age, T-stage, N-stage, grade, ER, PR). For the time-to-event analyses, starting point for all patients was two years after randomization, i.e. when treatment changed from Tamoxifen to Anastrozole on the experimental arm. To avoid crossover effects for post-study treatment, the total time for this analysis is 3 years. Results: The 3-year OS hazard ratio (HR) for Anastrozol versus Tamoxifen in ILC (n=694) was 0.24 (0.08-0.70) vs. IDC (n=2.739) HR 1.08 (0.75-1.58). In multivariate analysis, HR for ILC was 0.23 (0.08-0.68) vs. 1.02 (0.70-1.49) for IDC. The test for interaction of treatment and histology was significant (p=0.01). In ILC, no other clinico-pathologic factor was significantly associated with survival differences compared to IDC, where age, T- and N-stage maintained significance. In the models for DFS, our preliminary analysis after 3-year follow-up did not show significant variations in treatment effect according to histology. Discussion: The magnitude of survival benefit from adjuvant Anastrozol vs. Tamoxifen varies by histology in this large phase III randomized trial. A significant reduction in risk of death occurs only in patients with lobular cancer compared to ductal cancer after only 3 years of follow-up. An updated analysis with additional follow-up will be available at presentation. Citation Format: Michael Knauer, Christine Gruber, Otto Dietze, Richard Greil, Herbert Stöger, Margaretha Rudas, Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath, Brigitte Mlineritsch, Werner Kwasny, Christian Singer, Peter Dubsky, Raimund Jakesz, Florian Fitzal, Günther Steger, Rupert Bartsch, Martin Filipits, Christian Fesl, Michael Gnant. Survival advantage of anastrozol compared to tamoxifen for lobular breast cancer in the ABCSG-8 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr S2-06.

The purpose of this analysis was to assess the long-term impact of adding bevacizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).Patients eligible for the open-label randomized phase III BEATRICE trial had centrally confirmed triple-negative operable primary invasive breast cancer (pT1a-pT3). Investigators selected anthracycline- and/or taxane-based chemotherapy for each patient. After definitive surgery, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive ≥4 cycles of chemotherapy alone or with 1 year of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg/week equivalent). Stratification factors were nodal status, selected chemotherapy, hormone receptor status, and type of surgery. The primary end point was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS; previously reported). Secondary outcome measures included overall survival (OS) and safety.After 56 months' median follow-up, 293 of 2591 randomized patients had died. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between treatment arms in either the total population (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-1.17; P = 0.52) or pre-specified subgroups. The 5-year OS rate was 88% (95% CI 86-90%) in both treatment arms. Updated IDFS results were consistent with the primary IDFS analysis. Five-year IDFS rates were 77% (95% CI 75-79%) with chemotherapy alone versus 80% (95% CI 77-82%) with bevacizumab. From 18 months after first study dose to study end, new grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 4.6% and 4.5% of patients in the two arms, respectively.Final OS results showed no significant benefit from bevacizumab therapy for early TNBC. Late-onset toxicities were rare in both groups. Five-year OS and IDFS rates suggest that the prognosis for patients with TNBC is better than previously thought.NCT00528567.

In a longitudinal observation, extravasation of antitumoural compounds and the efficacy of its structured interdisciplinary management were assessed in a routine setting. One hundred sixty-nine patients with extravasation of cytotoxics were managed according to a prospective approach documenting the extravasated compound, localisation, duration until full symptom resolution and sequelae. Surgery was implemented in the case of failure of conservative measures. In 155 (91.7 %) out of 169 patients, conservative management was successful (surgical intervention, 14 patients). Extravasations of anthracyclines (N = 44), platinum compounds (N = 41), vinca alkaloids (N = 20) and taxanes (N = 19) were often associated with erythema, oedema and pain. The median period until full resolution of symptoms differed among the administered cytotoxics (anthracyclines, 55 days; taxanes and vinca alkaloids, 27 days; platinum compounds, 14 days) with statistical significance between the vesicants. Histologically, surgically resected specimens showed extensive necrotic areas with inflammatory infiltrates at the periphery of the removed lesions. In a routine setting, the standardised management of cytotoxic extravasations by an interdisciplinary task force resulted in a satisfactory outcome. When surgical intervention was indicated, complete remission of the lesions within a median of 14 days reduced the delay in the administration of further chemotherapy to a minimum. The proposed approach is therefore considered as suitable to manage extravasations in cancer chemotherapy in a large number of subjects and to ensure patient adherence to cytotoxic treatment.

Introduction Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) without pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is associated with high risk of disease recurrence. In ABCSG trials 14 and 24, concomitant epirubicin plus docetaxel (+/- capecitabine) was used as NAC regimen; patients (pts) without pCR routinely received another 4-8 cycles of adjuvant CMF. Tumours harbouring BRCA-1 germline mutations are apparently less responsive to taxane-based chemotherapy, while sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents is retained. In sporadic TNBC, BRCA-1 promotor methylation is frequently observed; this may also result in an impaired activity of genetic repair mechanisms. Therefore, we investigated the effect of adjuvant CMF as salvage therapy in pts with or without BRCA-1 promotor methylation who did not achieve pCR to taxane-based (cyclophosphamide-free) NAC. Moreover, the predictive role of TP53 mutations was investigated in these tumours. Methods All pts with TNBC refractory to taxane-based NAC who received adjuvant CMF were included. DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples with the Qiagen DNA FFPE Tissue Kit® and purified. For determining BRCA1 promoter methylation status, DNA was bisulfite-treated; the TaqMan® assay was used in order to perform a quantitative methylation-specific PCR. DNA quantity was normalized using Actin-b. For the investigation of TP53 mutations in exons 4-9, purified DNA was PCR amplified, sequenced by Sanger sequencing and results were analyzed with SeqScape® software version 2.7. Mutations were validated using the IARC p53 database. Results Twenty-four pts, median age 47 years, were available for this analysis. In 10/24 pts (41.7%), a BRCA-1 promotor methylation was detected; TP53 mutations were observed in 16/24 pts (66.7%). At a median follow-up of 27.5 months, 2/10 pts (20%) with BRCA-1 promotor metyhlation had a disease-free survival (DFS) event, as compared to 9/14 (64.3%) in the non-methylated group (p = 0.0472; Fisher's exact test). Kaplan Meier estimation of disease-free survival (DFS) in the non-methylated group was 16 months (95% CI 0.0-41.73) and was not reached in the methylated group (n.s.). TP53 mutation was neither associated with increased risk of disease recurrence nor with DFS. No correlation was observed between BRCA-1 promotor methylation and TP53 mutation; still, all methylated samples were exclusively affected be missense and nonsense mutations. Conclusions Adjuvant CMF is of limited activity in TNBC refractory to taxane-based NAC. Still, in breast cancer harbouring BRCA-1 promotor methylation, a significant decrease of DFS events was observed. TP53 mutation status on the other hand, was not associated with outcome; while no correlation was found between BRCA-1 promotor methylation and TP53 mutation status, we only observed missense and non-sense mutations in methylated samples. In conclusion, tumours harbouring BRCA-1 promotor methylation are apparently sensitive to DNA damage caused by cyclophosphamide. Further clinical validation of this concept is warranted. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P1-08-40.

Recent advances in the field of systemic treatment resulted in a significant decline of overall breast cancer mortality. Numerous important issues, however, remain unresolved. Among others, the optimal duration and sequence of endocrine therapy in the adjuvant setting are much debated. Furthermore, the advance of novel targeted treatment options in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive and hormone-receptor-positive breast cancers resulted in an urgent need for establishing reliable predictive markers. Finally, in triple-negative breast cancer, there are currently no specific biologically targeted therapies available.

Background: We investigated whether body mass index (BMI) can be used as a predictive parameter indicating patients who benefit from extended aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment. Methods: The ABCSG-6a trial re-randomised event-free postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive patients from the ABCSG-6 trial to receive either 3 additional years of endocrine therapy using anastrozole vs nil. In this retrospective analysis, we investigated the prognostic and predictive impact of BMI on disease outcome and safety. Results: In all, 634 patients (177 normal weight, 307 overweight, and 150 obese) patients were included in this analysis. Normal weight patients with additional 3 years of anastrozole halved their risk of disease recurrence (disease-free survival (DFS) HR 0.48; P=0.02) and death (HR 0.45; P=0.06) and had only a fifth of the risk of distant metastases (HR 0.22; P=0.05) compared with normal weight patients without any further treatment. In contrast, overweight+obese patients derived no benefit from additional 3 years of anastrozole (DFS HR 0.93; P=0.68; distant recurrence-free survival HR 0.91; P=0.78; and OS HR 0.9; P=0.68). The possible predictive impact of BMI on extended endocrine treatment could be strengthened by a Cox regression interaction model between BMI and treatment (P=0.07). Conclusion: Body mass index may be used to predict outcome benefit of extended AI treatment in patients with receptor-positive breast cancer.

Guidelines for using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients receiving chemotherapies with 10-20% (intermediate) risk for febrile neutropenia (FN) recommend additional assessment of patient-related FN risk factors.The current study evaluated adherence to guideline recommendations and analysed modalities of pegfilgrastim use.Adult cancer patients scheduled to receive a chemotherapy regimen assessed by the investigators as intermediate FN risk and who received pegfilgrastim were prospectively enrolled in this observational study from 2007-2010. Risk factors at study entry, treatment modalities and FN assessment were documented by investigators, whereas guideline adherence was centrally checked in a post-hoc analysis, according to guideline categorizations.Thirty-seven centres enrolled 335 evaluable patients with solid and hematologic neoplasias. Although physicians initially rated the FN risk of all chemotherapies as intermediate, after central re-assessment this applied only to 63.9% of regimens; 21.2% were reassessed as low risk and 14.9% as high risk. Pegfilgrastim was used as primary prophylaxis in 80.3% of all patients. The most frequent FN risk factors considered by physicians when deciding to use pegfilgrastim were female gender, advanced disease, age ≥ 65 years, and anaemia. FN incidence was higher in patients with ≥ 4 FN risk factors than those with4 risk factors (10% vs. 4.3%; p = 0.055) and in patients with severe comorbidity than those without (13.6% vs. 4.5%; p = 0.014). Overall FN rate was 5.7%.Due to the observational design of the study, findings are descriptive in nature. Post-hoc assessment of chemotherapy FN risk was determined by author's opinion in some cases.Overall, there was good adherence of Austrian physicians to guideline recommendations; however, there are chemotherapy regimens and clinical settings in which FN risk assignment is unclear in the literature. FN incidence with pegfilgrastim prophylaxis was similar to that reported in other observational and randomized studies.

Background: There exists evidence that body mass index (BMI) impacts on the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in patients with breast cancer. The relationship between BMI and the efficacy of tamoxifen is conflicting. We investigated the impact of BMI on the efficacy of single tamoxifen and tamoxifen plus an aromatase inhibitor in the well-defined prospective study population of the ABCSG-06 trial. Methods: ABCSG-06 investigated the efficacy of tamoxifen vs tamoxifen plus aminoglutethimide in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Taking BMI at baseline, patients were classified as normal weight (BMI=18.5–24.9 kg m−2), overweight (BMI=25–29.9 kg m−2), and obese (30 kg m−2) according to WHO criteria. Results: Overweight+obese patients had an increased risk for distant recurrences (hazard ratio (HR): 1.51; Cox P=0·018) and a worse overall survival (OS; HR: 1·49; Cox P=0·052) compared with normal weight patients. Analysing patients treated with single tamoxifen only, no difference between overweight+obese patients and normal weight patients regarding distant recurrence-free survival (HR: 1.35; Cox P=0·24) and OS (HR: 0.99; Cox P=0·97) could be observed. In contrast, in the group of patients treated with the combination of tamoxifen plus aminoglutethimide, overweight+obese patients had an increased risk for distant recurrences (1.67; Cox P=0·03) and a worse OS (1.47; Cox P=0·11) compared with normal weight patients. Conclusion: BMI impacts on the efficacy of aromatase inhibitor-based treatment but not single tamoxifen.

// Noemi Pavo 1 , Markus Raderer 2 , Georg Goliasch 1 , Raphael Wurm 1 , Guido Strunk 3 , Anna Cho 1 , Johannes F. Novak 1 , Heinz Gisslinger 2 , Gunther G. Steger 2 , Michael Hejna 2 , Wolfgang Kostler 2 , Sabine Zochbauer-Muller 2 , Christine Marosi 2 , Gabriela Kornek 2 , Leo Auerbach 4 , Sven Thorben Schneider 5 , Bernhard Parschalk 5 , Werner Scheithauer 2 , Robert Pirker 2 , Barbara Kiesewetter 2 , Richard Pacher 1 , Christoph Zielinski 2 and Martin Hulsmann 1 1 Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria 2 Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Oncology and Hematology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria 3 Complexity Research, Vienna, Austria 4 Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria 5 Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria Correspondence to: Martin Hulsmann, email: // Keywords : cancer, liver, biomarker, inflammation, prognosis Received : December 29, 2016 Accepted :April 04, 2017 Published : April 16, 2017 Abstract Background. Routinely tested liver biomarkers as alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT), butyryl-cholinesterase (BChE), albumin and bilirubin are altered in distinct malignancies and hepatic metastases. This study aimed to investigate whether all liver parameters have the ability to predict long-term mortality in treatment naive cancer patients but without a malignant hepatic involvement. Methods. We prospectively enrolled 555 consecutive patients with primary diagnosis of cancer without prior anticancer therapy. BChE, albumin, AST, ALT, GGT and bilirubin as well as the inflammatory makers C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were determined. All-cause mortality was defined as primary endpoint. Results. During a median follow-up of 25 (IQR16-31) months 186 (34%) patients died. All liver parameters were significantly associated with all-cause mortality (p < 0.001 for all). However, for patients without a malignant primary or secondary hepatic involvement (82%) only the functional parameters BChE and albumin remained significantly associated with the primary endpoint (crude HR per 1-IQR increase 0.61, 95%CI:0.49-0.77; p < 0.001 for BChE and 0.58, 95%CI:0.47-0.70; p < 0.001 for albumin). This e ect was persistent after multivariate adjustment (adj.HR per 1-IQR increase 0.65, 95%CI:0.50-0.86; p = 0.002 for BChE and 0.63, 95%CI:0.50-0.79; p < 0.001 for albumin). BChE and albumin correlated inversely with CRP ( r = -0.21, p < 0.001 and r = -0.36, p < 0.001), SAA ( r = -0.19, p < 0.001 and r = -0.33, p < 0.001) and IL-6 ( r = -0.13, p = 0.009 and r = -0.17, p = 0.001). Conclusions. Decreased serum BChE and albumin levels are associated with increased all-cause mortality in treatment-naive cancer patients without a manifest malignant hepatic involvement irrespective of tumor entity or stage. This association may reflect progressing systemic inflammation and metabolic derangement with subclinical involvement of the liver.

Background: The clinical course of breast cancer patients with brain metastases (BM) as only metastatic site (brain-only metastatic breast cancer (BO-MBC)) has been insufficiently explored. Methods: All breast cancer patients with BM treated at our institution between 1990 and 2011 were identified. For each patient, full information on follow-up and administered therapies was mandatory for inclusion. Oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and Her2 status were determined according to standard protocols. Statistical analyses including computation of survival probabilities was performed. Results: In total, 222 female patients (26% luminal; 47% Her2; 27% triple negative) with BM of MBC were included in this study. In all, 38/222 (17%) BM patients did not develop extracranial metastases (ECM) during their disease course and were classified as BO-MBC. Brain-only-MBC was not associated with breast cancer subtype or number of BM. The median overall survival of BO-MBC patients was 11 months (range 0–69) and was significantly longer than in patients with BM and ECM (6 months, range 0–104; P=0.007). In all, 7/38 (18%) BO-MBC patients had long-term survival of >3 years after diagnosis of BM and long-term survival was significantly more common in BO-MBC patients as compared with BM patients with ECM (P

Purpose Anastrozole (ANA) alone delivers significant disease-free survival benefits over tamoxifen (TAM) monotherapy in postmenopausal women with early estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer. The ABCSG-8 (Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group 8) study is a large phase III clinical trial addressing the sequence strategy containing ANA in comparison with 5 years of TAM in a low- to intermediate-risk group of postmenopausal patients. Patients and Methods Endocrine receptor–positive patients with G1 or G2 tumors were eligible. After surgery, patients were randomly assigned to 5 years of TAM or 2 years of TAM followed by 3 years of ANA. Adjuvant chemotherapy and G3 and T4 tumors were exclusion criteria. Intention-to-treat and censored analyses of on-treatment recurrence-free survival (RFS) were performed, and exploratory survival end points and toxicity were investigated. Results Information from 3,714 patients, including 17,563 woman-years, with a median of 60 months of follow-up was available for this analysis. Median age was 63.8 years, 75% were node negative, and 75% had T1 tumors. Sequencing of ANA after identical 2-year treatment with TAM in both arms did not result in a statistically significant improvement of RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.01; P = .06). Exploratory analyses of distant relapse-free survival indicated a 22% improvement (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.00). On-treatment adverse events and serious adverse events were consistent with known toxicity profiles of ANA and TAM treatment. Conclusion Despite a low overall rate of recurrence in a population with breast cancer at limited risk of relapse, the a priori sequence strategy of 2 years of TAM followed by 3 years of ANA led to small outcome and toxicity benefits.

Background: Brain metastases (BM) are frequently diagnosed in patients with HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer; in addition, an increasing incidence was reported for triple-negative tumours. We aimed to compare brain metastases free survival (BMFS) of breast cancer subtypes in patients treated between 1996 until 2010. Methods: Brain metastases free survival was measured as the interval from diagnosis of extracranial breast cancer metastases until diagnosis of BM. HER-2 status was analysed by immunohistochemistry and reanalysed by fluorescent in situ hybridisation if a score of 2+ was gained. Oestrogen-receptor (ER) and progesterone-receptor (PgR) status was analysed by immunohistochemistry. Brain metastases free survival curves were estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Results: Data of 213 patients (46 luminal/124 HER-2/43 triple-negative subtype) with BM from breast cancer were available for the analysis. Brain metastases free survival differed significantly between breast cancer subtypes. Median BMFS in triple-negative tumours was 14 months (95% CI: 11.34–16.66) compared with 18 months (95% CI: 14.46–21.54) in HER-2-positive tumours (P=0.001) and 34 months (95% CI: 23.71–44.29) in luminal tumours (P=0.001), respectively. In HER-2-positive patients, co-positivity for ER and HER-2 prolonged BMFS (26 vs 15 m; P=0.033); in luminal tumours, co-expression of ER and PgR was not significantly associated with BMFS. Brain metastases free survival in patients with lung metastases was significantly shorter (17 vs 21 months; P=0.014). Conclusion: Brain metastases free survival in triple-negative breast cancer, as well as in HER-2-positive/ER-negative, is significantly shorter compared with HER-2/ER co-positive or luminal tumours, mirroring the aggressiveness of these breast cancer subtypes.

BACKGROUND Brain metastases (BM) are frequently diagnosed in patients (pts) with Her2-positive metastatic breast cancer (BC); a rising incidence was also reported in triple-negative disease. We hypothesized that pts with triple-negative or Her2-positive tumours had shorter BMFS as compared to other BC subtypes. Therefore, we aimed to compare BMFS in pts with Her2-positive, estrogen receptor (ER) positive and triple-negative BC treated at the Medical University of Vienna from 1999–2009. In Her2-positive tumours, we further investigated the influence of ER co-expression on BMFS, as Her2-positive / ER-positive tumours were reported to express less aggressive biological properties. METHODS BMFS was defined as primary study endpoint and measured as the interval from diagnosis of metastatic BC until diagnosis of BM. A total of 168 pts were identified from a breast cancer database. 34 pts were excluded from this analysis as brain was the first site of disease progression; hence complete datasets from 134 pts were available (69 Her2-positive; 33 triple-negative; 32 ER-positive). Her2 status was analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and reanalyzed by FISH if a score of 2+ was gained. ER was analyzed by IHC; ER negative tumours were defined by a cut-off value of RESULTS Median BMFS in triple-negative pts was 14 months (m) (95% CI 12.17−15.83), as compared to 25 m (95% CI 13.37−36.62) in Her2-positive (p=0.001) and 35 m (95% CI 19.79−50.22) in ER-positive pts (p In Her2-positive pts, prior trastuzumab treatment for metastatic disease prolonged median BMFS (29 vs. 11 m; p ER-expression (HR 2.03; 95%CI 1.22−3.36; p CONCLUSIONS BMFS in triple-negative disease is significantly shorter as compared to Her2-positive or ER-positive tumours, mirroring the aggressiveness of this breast cancer subtype. Probably due to improved systemic disease control, trastuzumab significantly prolonged BMFS in Her2-positive pts. Longer BMFS in ER/Her2 co-positive disease reflects a less aggressive subtype of Her2-positive breast cancer which is less likely to benefit from strategies of BM screening or prevention. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-17-05.

Background Primary results from a phase 3, randomized, double-blind double-dummy trial showed that compared with zoledronic acid (ZA), denosumab reduced the risk of developing a first on-study SRE by 18% (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI 0.71 to 0.95; P = 0.01), and the risk of multiple SREs by 23% (rate ratio, 0.77; 95% CI 0.66 to 0.89; P = 0.001) in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases. Based on superior efficacy and favorable safety data from the study's primary analysis (Stopeck et al, 2010), all patients who remained on treatment were offered open-label denosumab in a prespecified 2-year extension treatment phase. Materials and Methods: A total of 2046 patients with breast cancer and bone metastasis were randomized to receive either subcutaneous (SC) denosumab 120 mg and intravenous (IV) placebo or IV ZA 4 mg (adjusted for renal function) and SC placebo Q4W in the double-blinded treatment phase. Patients who completed the double-blinded treatment phase were offered open-label denosumab Q4W for up to 2 years from the start of the open-label treatment phase. Patients who did not participate in the open-label treatment were followed for survival every 12 weeks for up to 2 years after their last dose of investigational product in the double-blinded treatment phase. Results: Of the 752 patients who completed the double-blinded treatment phase, 667 (89%) patients entered the open-label treatment phase: 325 (48.7%) initially randomized to the denosumab group (DD) and 342 (51.3%) to the ZA group in the double-blinded treatment phase (ZD). Demographics were comparable between groups. The total median (Q1, Q3) cumulative denosumab exposure (including double-blinded and open-label treatment phases) for DD patients was 19.3 months (9.2, 32.2) (range 0.9−59.8 months). Adverse events (AEs) were comparable between groups (n = 283/318 [89%] for DD patients; n = 303/334 [91%] ZD patients). An additional 20 patients in the DD group and 18 patients in the ZD group reported osteonecrosis of the jaw, resulting in a cumulative incidence of 4.7% for DD patients and 3.5% for ZD patients for the entire study duration of 5 years. Hypocalcemia AEs during the open-label treatment phase were comparable between groups (n = 12 DD; n = 9 ZD). The most common AEs were nausea, fatigue, and back pain. Serious AEs were reported in 126 (39.6%) DD patients and 133 (39.8%) ZD patients. Overall survival was similar between groups over the entire study: median 34.4 months (95% CI 31.5 to 39.3) for DD patients, 34.2 months (95% CI 31.0 to 37.6) for ZD patients. Conclusion: A two-year open-label extension treatment phase confirmed the long-term safety profile of denosumab in these breast cancer patients with bone metastases who continued receiving denosumab for up to 5 years or who switched from ZA to denosumab. No new safety signals were observed with up to 5 years of monthly denosumab therapy. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-16-07.

Background: Trastuzumab-based therapy after diagnosis of brain metastases (BM) may improve survival due to prolonged systemic disease control. We investigated whether lapatinib may yield additional survival benefit. Methods: Eighty patients with BM from HER2-positive breast cancer were identified. Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) of at least 70 was required. We included a control group of 37 patients treated before 2003, when continuation of trastuzumab after diagnosis of BM was not yet recommended. Remainders received either trastuzumab or lapatinib and trastuzumab (either concomitantly or sequentially) with or without chemotherapy. Results: Median overall survival (OS) in patients receiving trastuzumab after diagnosis of BM was 13 months; corresponding numbers were 9 months in patients treated with chemotherapy, and 3 months with radiotherapy alone. Median OS was not reached in the lapatinib group. Addition of lapatinib prolonged OS over trastuzumab alone (P=0.002). After correction for potential confounders, lapatinib therapy remained an independent positive predictor for survival (HR 0.279; P=0.012). Interpretation: This retrospective single-centre study suggests that the introduction of lapatinib improved survival in patients with BM from HER2-positive breast cancer. Patients with KPS ⩾70 may benefit when treated with lapatinib in addition to trastuzumab after completion of local therapy.

n Abstract: Over the past years, experience has been increasing with lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy (SNB) after preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer, with a wide range of results reported in the literature and final conclusions on the diagnostic value and clinical consequences of this sequential approach still missing. Between 1999 and 2002, the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) conducted a prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing three versus six preoperative cycles of epirubicin ⁄docetaxel + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for operable breast cancer. Of the 292 patients recruited to the trial overall, 111 were enrolled in a prospective subprotocol for performing LM and SNB in addition to obligatory axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after PC. SNB after PC identified at least one sentinel node in 100 of 111 patients (identification rate 90%). In six cases, a false-negative SN was identified, resulting in a false-negative rate of 13% (6 of 47). We only found little correlation between patients and tumor characteristics and the identification rate or false-negative rate. Lymphatic mapping and SNB after primary chemotherapy failed to predict histologic infiltration of the sentinel node with sufficient sensitivity. The routine use of SNB after primary chemotherapy should therefore be discouraged. n

survival (OS) was improved for some of these women. There are several issues that urgently need to be addressed: These data are clearly in contrast to the EBCTCG overview for several reasons: There is a 4.3% improvement in distant metastases whereas the local recurrence rate (LRR) benefit was 2.3%. This is against the previous paradigm that at least 10% decrease of LRR needs to be achieved to have a significant shift in OS. Furthermore, the distant metastasis survival curves separate early. In fact, they seem to separate in parallel to the LRR curves. This trial should be considered practice changing. RNI should be considered for patients with higherrisk tumors and 1–3 positive lymph nodes. Among the many interesting reports during the ASCO 2011 I would simply like to point out two other subject areas: 1) Dual inhibition of the Her-2 receptor is a very effective neoadjuvant treatment. It is also striking how effective these treatments are in the absence of cytototoxic treatment. Future research should be directed in defining a subgroup of patients that can be treated without the addition of chemotherapy. This is an exciting direction of clinical research. 2) The German Breast Cancer Group did not receive much attention for a highly interesting abstract concerning the post-neoadjuvant survival of patients (abstract 1028). These data include the survival of over 6,300 women with a median follow-up of 42 months and should be studied with great care, since they are likely to influence many of our treatment and follow-up choices after patients have undergone preoperative chemotherapy.

The Lapatinib Expanded Access Program (LEAP) was initiated in 45 countries to provide lapatinib in combination with capecitabine to patients with ErbB2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer already treated with anthracyclines, taxanes and trastuzumab. We report the results from 12 Central and Eastern European countries.By 30 September 2008, 293 patients were enrolled. Patients were monitored for serious adverse events (SAEs) and for any decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Overall survival and progression-free survival were also assessed.Mean treatment duration was 30 weeks; 107 patients (36.5%) discontinued therapy during the study, mainly due to disease progression (n = 86; 29.4%). A total of 78 SAEs were reported from 47 patients; the most frequently reported was diarrhoea (13 reports). Treatment had a relatively small effect on LVEF. Decreases were minor (0 to20%) in 61% of patients at the end of the study. During the study, 3 patients had decreased LVEF meeting the definition of an SAE; these events all resolved. Median overall and median progression-free survival were 37.6 and 21.1 weeks, respectively.Heavily pretreated patients with ErbB2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer may benefit from treatment with lapatinib and capecitabine, with a low risk of cardiac toxicity.

Background: ABCSG-12 examined the efficacy of ovarian suppression using goserelin combined with tamoxifen (TAM) or anastrozole (ANA) ± zoledronic acid (ZOL) in premenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer. Results at 48 months and at 62 months show that adding ZOL significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) and reduced disease recurrence. Methods: Premenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer (N = 1,803) were randomized to goserelin (3.6 mg q28d) and TAM (20 mg/d) or ANA (1 mg/d) ± ZOL (4 mg q6mo) for 3 years. Endpoints included DFS and overall survival, both analyzed using log-rank test and Cox models. Results: At 48 months’ median follow-up, ZOL significantly reduced the risk of DFS events by 36% versus no-ZOL (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.64; P = .01); this was maintained at 62 months’ follow-up (HR = 0.68; P = .009). In addition, the trend toward reduced risk of death with ZOL was maintained at both 48 months (HR = 0.60; P = .11) and 62 months (HR = 0.66; P = .10) compared with no-ZOL. Patients receiving ZOL also had fewer distant recurrences compared with no-ZOL: 29 versus 41 events at 48 months, and 44 versus 56 events at 62 months. No significant renal adverse events or confirmed cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) have been reported. Conclusions: Comparisons of 48- and 62-month data suggest a possible carry-over of the ZOL anticancer benefit 2 years after treatment completion. Additional analyses will be presented, including disease outcomes during therapy and after treatment, as well as overall survival analyses. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-11-02.

We conducted a phase II feasibility study using preoperative chemotherapy with cisplatin and docetaxel followed by surgical resection and postoperative chemoradiation in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal cancer.Preoperative chemotherapy (two or three cycles) consisted of 50 mg/m(2) docetaxel and 50 mg/m(2) cisplatin. Surgical resection was planned 4 weeks after the last chemotherapy cycle. Patients underwent postsurgical chemoradiation, receiving a total dose of 39.6 Gy and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) continuous infusion (350 mg/m(2)/day). The primary end-points were feasibility, overall response rate and R0 resectability rate after preoperative chemotherapy. The secondary end-points were tolerability, treatment-associated complications, disease-free survival and overall survival.Between 2002 and 2004, 15 patients were enrolled in this study. After neoadjuvant treatment, two patients (13%) experienced progressive disease, four patients (27%) showed partial remission and nine patients (60%) showed stable disease. In 11 patients (73%) R0 resectability could be achieved. Six of these patients (54%) were able to undergo postoperative chemoradiation. Notably, five (83%) of these patients were disease free and alive at median follow-up of 72 months. Chemotherapy-associated neutropaenia and neutropaenic fever, anastomotic dehiscence, pulmonary embolism and acute pancreatitis were observed.The combination of preoperative chemotherapy and postoperative chemoradiation is feasible in a significant subset of gastric cancer patients.