Search

Purpose: To report the long-term follow-up of bilateral ectasia after laser-assisted small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with known risk factors., Case Report: We report the case of a 23-year-old woman. Preoperative refraction was - 7.25 -2.00 × 20 in the right eye and -7.25 -1.50 × 155 in the left eye. Maximal keratometry was 47.32 diopters and 48.37 diopters, respectively, which was a contraindication to Laser Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) and a SMILE was proposed in 2015. One year after surgery, ectasia developed in the left eye and crosslinking (CXL) was performed. Two years after surgery, ectasia also developed in the right eye and CXL was also performed, leading to stabilization in both eyes five years after surgery., Conclusions: Known contraindications for LASIK are also contraindications for the performance of refractive surgery with SMILE. CXL is an efficient treatment of post-SMILE corneal ectasia.

Purpose: While endothelial keratoplasty has become the standard treatment for Fuchs dystrophy, the strategy for first-line surgery in patients with associated cataract is still debated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of eyes with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) undergoing phacoemulsification alone, to ascertain preoperative factors that predict the need for endothelial keratoplasty (EK)., Methods: Single-center retrospective study. Cataract surgery alone was performed in 64 eyes of 50 patients with FECD. This decision was made if the patient did not have morning blur, the central corneal thickness (CCT) was below 630 microns, and endothelial cells were visible in the periphery., Results: Mean follow-up was 21 months (range 5-55 months). The mean preoperative CCT was 571±43μm. 6 months after surgery, it was 584±52μm (P=0.12). During follow-up, 14 eyes (22%) required an EK because of poor visual outcome after cataract surgery alone. Mean pre-operative CCT of these eyes (595±23μm) was significantly higher than eyes that did not require EK during follow-up (564±45μm, P=0.022). Over 570 microns, 34% of eyes required an endothelial keratoplasty after the cataract surgery alone., Conclusions: CCT below 630μm associated with the absence of morning blur are preoperative criteria allowing 78.1% eyes with FECD to obtain good visual outcomes after cataract surgery alone. In these eyes, EK can therefore be avoided while ensuring good results., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Purpose: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) combined with cataract extraction and intraocular lens insertion (new triple procedure) limits postoperative refractive errors. The objective of this study was to assess refractive accuracy after DMEK combined with cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation., Setting: Four university hospitals (Rouen, Paris, Reims, Grenoble)., Design: This retrospective multicenter study included patients with symptomatic corneal endothelial decompensation and cataract., Methods: The primary outcome was the difference between the target spherical equivalent and postoperative refraction at months 2 and 6. Secondary outcomes were visual acuity, keratometry, pachymetry and endothelial cell density., Results: A total of 130 eyes of 111 patients (mean age 66.2 years) were included (94% with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy). For a mean refractive target set at -0.50 (±0.57) D, the mean (95% CI) refractive error was hyperopia of +0.49 (0.314; 0.664) D at 2 months and +0.46 (0.299; 0.619) D at 6 months. Best corrected distance visual acuity was improved in all patients: from 0.49 (±0.3) logMAR to 0.14 (±0.14) logMAR at 2 months and 0.05 (±0.1) logMAR at 6 months. Mean corneal thickness decreased from 621.6 (±37.6) μm to 515.2 (±42.6) μm at 2 months and 539.0 (±39.0) μm at 6 months., Conclusions: Good refractive accuracy was obtained after the new triple procedure with DMEK. Hyperopic shift is common after triple procedures, and its persistence should be evaluated in future studies in order to anticipate a change in its value to optimize intraocular lens power calculation., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Phacoemulsification can be challenging in patients who are unable to lie flat or sit in a reclined position that exceeds 30 degrees to 45 degrees during surgery. We describe a new technique that we have used on 4 eyes of two patients. Both were operated on while sitting in a strictly upright position, resting their chin in front of a mobile slitlamp in the same manner as during a standard ophthalmologic examination. The surgeon sits on the other side of the slitlamp, facing the patient, and operates via a temporal corneal incision. The described operating conditions were deemed perfectly adequate by the experienced surgeon. Both patients recovered a corrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 in both eyes and said they would recommend this surgery to anyone who cannot lie flat. Surgeons should consider this technique when standard surgical positioning is not possible., (Copyright © 2019 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the performance of two diffractive trifocal and one extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs)., Methods: In this 6-month, single-center, prospective, randomized, comparative study, patients undergoing routine cataract surgery were randomized to receive one of two trifocal IOLs (AcrySof IQ PanOptix; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, or FineVision Micro F; PhysIOL SA, Liège, Belgium) or an EDOF IOL (TECNIS Symfony; Abbott Medical Optics, Inc., Abbott Park, IL). There were 20 patients in each group. The primary outcome was binocular and monocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA), and near (UNVA) visual acuity. The secondary outcomes were quality of vision and aberrometry., Results: There was no statistically significant difference between groups in either monocular (P = .717) or binocular (P = .837) UDVA. Monocular and binocular UNVA were statistically and significantly better for both trifocal lenses than for the EDOF IOL (P = .002). The percentage of patients with J2 UNVA was 52.5% monocularly and 70% binocularly for the TECNIS Symfony IOL, 81.5% monocularly and 100% binocularly for the AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOL, and 82.5% monocularly and 95% binocularly for the FineVision Micro F IOL. There was no significant difference in binocular UIVA between groups; VA was better than 0.6 in 55%, 53%, and 35% of patients with the TECNIS Symfony, AcrySof IQ Pan-Optix, and FineVision Micro F IOLs, respectively. Overall, 90% patients achieved spectacle independence. There were no differences in visual symptoms and aberrometry among groups., Conclusions: All three IOLs provided good visual acuity at all distances, a high percentage of spectacle independence, and little or no impact of visual symptoms on the patients' daily functioning. Near vision was statistically better for both trifocal IOLs compared to the EDOF IOL. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(8):507-514.]., (Copyright 2018, SLACK Incorporated.)