1. δ13C correction to AMS data: Values derived from AMS vs IRMS values
- Author
-
Alexander Cherkinsky, G. V. Ravi Prasad, and Randy Culp
- Subjects
Physics ,010506 paleontology ,Nuclear and High Energy Physics ,Accuracy and precision ,High energy ,060102 archaeology ,δ13C ,Stable isotope ratio ,Analytical chemistry ,06 humanities and the arts ,Fractionation ,01 natural sciences ,0601 history and archaeology ,Isotope-ratio mass spectrometry ,Instrumentation ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Accelerator mass spectrometry - Abstract
14C data from AMS measurements need to be corrected for isotopic fractionation using the δ13C values. Whether to use the δ13C values obtained from the AMS stable isotope measurements as they reflect any additional isotopic fractionation or to use Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry (IRMS) δ13C values due to their high precision and accuracy is the question that finds supporting arguments on either side. In this article, we present our observations by examining the data from the two AMS units at CAIS: a 500 kV CAMS and a 250 kV SSAMS. Offline δ13C values resulted in the fraction modern values of standards that are in excellent agreement with the consensus values for both machines. In the case of SSAMS, beyond a certain value, the high energy 12C beam current is found suppressed and skewed the δ13C. In general, the 13C+/12C+ ratio on SSAMS is more susceptible to beam current variation than it is on CAMS. But 14C+/13C+ ratios are nearly independent of beam current variations on both machines. Our analysis shows that online δ13C works well for CAMS, but results are not satisfactory for SSAMS. But we have found that using pre-acceleration 12C− instead of post-acceleration 12C+ for stable isotope ratio calculation substantially improves the online δ13C for SSAMS.
- Published
- 2019